Dharma · AI Companion

世俗諦

saṃvṛti-satya

世俗谛指世间语言、文字、假名设施及因缘生灭之法,是如来悲愍度化众生的方便施设。

A Contemporary Reading

In the grand architecture of Buddhist philosophy, if we were to describe the path of liberation as waking up from a dream, we must first deeply understand the structure of the dream itself. You cannot transcend a matrix you do not comprehend. This brings us to a foundational and profoundly pragmatic concept in the Mahayana tradition: 世俗谛 (saṃvṛti-satya), generally translated as the Conventional Truth or Worldly Truth.

To a contemporary reader, "conventional truth" might sound like mere common sense or societal norms. But in the context of the Dharma, it is infinitely more vast. It is the entire operating system of our reality, the very fabric of how we experience, name, and navigate the universe.

Let us explore this deeply, tracing it from the surface of our daily lives all the way to its ultimate role in the path of liberation.

### 这个概念在说什么 (What is this concept saying)

According to the classical sutras (such as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* and the *Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra*), 世俗谛 (saṃvṛti-satya) is defined through three distinct but interwoven layers. It is strictly not a mere "falsehood," but a highly specific operational reality:

1. The Construct of Language and Designation (语言、文字、假名设施) Fundamentally, Conventional Truth encompasses all worldly languages, texts, sounds, and provisional designations (假名设施). It is the realization that a label is just a label: "有名无实" (having a name but no inherent, independent reality). This includes the names we call each other ("某甲" - a certain person), concepts like "sentient beings," "lifespan," or "author." Astonishingly, the sutras point out that even sacred concepts like "Buddha" (佛), "Bodhi" (菩提 - Awakening), and the names of the aggregates (色阴受想行识 - the aggregates of form, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness) belong to Conventional Truth. They are "但名但用" (only names, only functions)—tools used for communication, not solid entities.

2. The Reality of Dependent Origination and Life/Death (因缘生灭之法) Conventional Truth is not a hallucination of things that don't exist at all (like turtle hair or rabbit horns, which are merely logical impossibilities); rather, it describes the actual mechanics of "世谛诸法不全无" (Conventional dharmas are not entirely nothing). It is the realm of things born from conditions and karma (因业所作事). Everything that undergoes the cycle of birth, decay, destruction, and death—including the Eight Sufferings (八苦相) and the clustering of the Five Aggregates (五阴 / pañca-skandha)—belongs to this truth. It is the physics and mechanics of cause and effect.

3. The Compassionate Skillful Means of the Awakened (如来悲愍施设) Why did the Buddha speak of a "world" if the ultimate reality (第一义谛 / paramārtha-satya) is empty of inherent existence? Because of profound compassion. The Conventional Truth is a pedagogical tool. The Buddha uses it to interact with beings trapped in the cycle of the six realms, speaking to them in the language of their own conceptual frameworks. A Bodhisattva must master this truth to teach others without feeling exhausted by it.

In the *Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra*, the Buddha beautifully breaks down this Conventional Truth into Five Worldly Dharmas (五种世法), showing exactly how our reality is woven together. Let’s map these directly onto our modern experience.

### 生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

Let’s take a typical contemporary morning—say, arriving at your office or opening your laptop to start the workday—and walk it through the classical Buddhist definition of the Five Worldly Dharmas.

1. 名世 (Name-world): This refers to nouns and conceptual boundaries (classically: men, women, bottles, clothes). *Walkthrough:* You sit at your desk and identify your "laptop," your "coffee mug," and your "manager." You believe these are solid, independent entities. In truth, the "laptop" is just a provisional name for an assemblage of plastic, silicon, metal, and electricity. 2. 句世 (Sentence-world): This refers to constructed communication and logic (classically: four-line verses, speech). *Walkthrough:* You open Slack or email and begin typing sentences, sending code, or reading a report. You string together "Name-world" concepts into narratives: "The project is delayed." These sentences create a secondary layer of reality you react to emotionally. 3. 缚世 (Binding-world): This refers to actions, connections, and physical engagements (classically: tying knots, joining palms in greeting). *Walkthrough:* You shake hands with a client, you swipe your ID badge at the turnstile, or you plug in your charger. You are constantly tying yourself into physical and social networks of action. 4. 法世 (Dharma/Institutional-world): This refers to systemic signals and collective agreements (classically: beating the wooden block to gather the monks, blowing a conch shell). *Walkthrough:* Your calendar app pings with a 15-minute warning. A Zoom link is generated. Everyone agrees that 10:00 AM means "gather here." This is an entirely fabricated, collective conventional reality that governs human behavior. 5. 执著世 (Attachment-world): This is the psychological trap (classically: seeing someone in dyed robes and attaching to the idea that they are inherently a holy monk). *Walkthrough:* You see a colleague in a sharp, tailored suit with a "VP" title on their door, and you immediately feel intimidated. You have attached an inherent, solid authority to a set of outer signs and social designations.

*The Trap to Point Out:* The most common mistake contemporary people make is not that we use these five worldly dharmas (we have to in order to function), but that we *believe they are ultimately real*. We suffer because we mistake the "Name" (the job title) and the "Attachment" (the prestige) for our true identity, forgetting they are just temporary configurations of conditions.

### 当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

We need a deep grasp of 世俗谛 (Conventional Truth) to avoid the dual traps of our era: materialistic obsession on one side, and depressed nihilism on the other.

In contemporary terms, we can loosely compare Conventional Truth to the algorithms running our digital lives. An algorithm curates a feed tailored specifically to your past actions (your "karma"). It feels incredibly real and emotionally evocative. A wise person knows the feed is just data weights and pixels (Ultimate Truth), but they don't smash their phone; they navigate the interface skillfully, perhaps using it to learn or help others (Conventional Truth). *Note:* This analogy has its limits. Human algorithms are flawed, profit-driven codes, whereas the Buddhist law of dependent origination is the flawless, natural law of the universe. Science and tech can only map patterns; the Dharma is designed to uproot the suffering born from those patterns.

In the path of liberation, the Bodhisattva adopts a breathtaking attitude: "隨順俗諦而不厭倦,觀第一義諦而不取證" *(Comply with the conventional truth without weariness, contemplate the ultimate truth without grasping at realization).* They play the game of life fully, feeling the joys and sorrows of sentient beings, using language, building hospitals, and teaching, yet their minds are entirely free because they know it is a provisional construct.

However, the sutras, particularly the *Mahāsamnipāta Sūtra* (大方等大集经), issue a strict warning: while we use Conventional Truth, we cannot rely on it for ultimate liberation. To achieve awakening, we must anchor our practice in the 第一义谛 (paramārtha-satya - Ultimate Truth). The sutra uses a series of perfectly structured, one-to-one metaphors to illustrate this necessity:

* To fill the ocean of omniscience: Relying on the Ultimate Truth is like a massive, surging river (大河) that can swiftly fill the great ocean; Conventional Truth is merely a small creek (小河) that cannot. * To make wholesome roots firm: Relying on the Ultimate Truth is like Mount Sumeru (须弥山王) standing unshakably upon the solid earth (大地); Conventional Truth is like trying to rest a mountain upon shifting water (水). * To grow merits (like the Four Foundations of Mindfulness): They must be rooted in the Ultimate Truth, just as great trees (草木) rely on the deep earth to grow, rather than trying to sprout suspended on fragile leaves or grass (草叶 - Conventional Truth). * To blow away wrong views and afflictions: The power of the Ultimate Truth is like a fierce, unstoppable wind moving through open space (猛风依虚空); it cannot be hindered, unlike a wind obstructed down on the ground (地 - Conventional Truth). * To cultivate the Bodhi-mind without confusion: Relying on the Ultimate Truth is like the brilliant sunlight (日光) that clearly reveals all things in the universe; Conventional Truth is but the dim, flickering light of a tiny oil lamp (油灯小光).

### 常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: "Conventional Truth means everything is a fake illusion, so nothing matters." *Clarification:* This is a dangerous slide into nihilism (断灭见). The sutras explicitly state: "世谛诸法不全无" (Conventional dharmas are not entirely nothing). They are "有名无实" (having names without independent substance), but the *laws of cause and effect* within this conventional reality are strict and unforgiving. If you cut your finger in a dream, it still bleeds and hurts in the context of the dream. Conventional truth is the sphere where karma operates (因业所作事). How you treat others matters deeply, which is why moral conduct is the foundation of Buddhist practice.

Misreading 2: "Ultimate Truth and Conventional Truth are opposites; to get to the Ultimate, I must destroy the Conventional." *Clarification:* The Buddha declares in the *Nirvana Sutra*: "世谛者即第一义谛" (The Conventional Truth is precisely the Ultimate Truth). They are not two different dimensions stacked on top of each other; they are two ways of seeing the exact same reality. To a confused mind, a flower is a solid, independent thing (attachment to Conventional). To an Awakened being, that exact same flower is seen as a beautiful, temporary dance of sunlight, soil, water, and time (Ultimate).

This is why the Buddha differentiates between "世谛慈" (Conventional Compassion) and "第一义慈" (Ultimate Compassion). Conventional compassion pities "others" as solid entities suffering in a solid world, which eventually leads to burnout and grief. Ultimate compassion loves and saves beings limitlessly, precisely because it sees that the boundaries between "self" and "other" were only ever provisional names to begin with.

To understand 世俗谛 is to learn how to speak the language of the world perfectly, while your heart rests quietly in the unshakeable silence of the ultimate.

Canonical Entry

1. 定义与核心要义 世俗谛(saṃvṛti-satya),在汉译佛典中又常被称为“世谛”或“俗谛”[chunk:14887, chunk:16105, chunk:16857]。综合大乘诸经的论述,世俗谛的核心要义主要体现在以下三个维度: 首先,世俗谛是指世间一切语言、文字、音声、假说及名言设施[chunk:16105, chunk:13772]。诸如“佛”、“菩提”、“菩萨”、“授记”等概念,在本质上皆属于“但名但用,但是世諦但是言說,但是施設所言”[chunk:16869]。 其次,世俗谛涵盖了一切世俗生死所行与因缘生灭之法[chunk:16855]。凡夫随“五阴”和合而称呼的“某甲”(人名),以及我、众生、寿命、知见、丈夫、作者、受者,乃至龟毛兔角、旋火之轮、诸阴界入等,皆属于有名无实的世俗谛[chunk:9106]。凡有“烧、割、死、坏”的现象,以及“八苦相”等,亦皆属世俗谛的范畴[chunk:9107]。 最后,世俗谛是如来因悲愍众生而施设的教化工具[chunk:16857]。世俗谛并非完全虚无(“世諦諸法不全無”)[chunk:16758],而是“因業所作事”与“因緣處”的体现[chunk:17393, chunk:17395, chunk:17397]。 2. 主要阐述 在大乘经藏中,各部类经典从不同角度对世俗谛进行了系统阐释: 其一,如来的悲愍施设与方便度化。如来为了利益世间、向众生显示六趣等世间差别而宣说俗谛[chunk:16857]。菩萨摩诃萨为了修行般若波罗蜜多并成熟众生,在世俗谛中为众生说法而无有疲厌[chunk:16105, chunk:16106]。在度化众生时,如来常进行“第一义谛说为世谛”或“世谛说为第一义谛”的灵活互换[chunk:9653]。对于如来而言,“一切世諦,若於如來即是第一義諦”[chunk:9212]。然而,世俗谛的境界极为深奥,佛陀与弥勒菩萨共论世谛时,舍利弗等五百声闻皆不能识知[chunk:9212, chunk:9685]。 其二,修行者对世俗谛的应有态度。一方面,修行者不应对世俗谛产生执著。若在俗谛中执以为“真”,或在无常、无我、不净中执着常、我、净、乐,皆属于“顛倒慧”[chunk:16857]。菩萨在修行中应当“不著二諦”[chunk:12168],既不执著真谛与世谛[chunk:12629],亦不住于世谛真谛[chunk:13770]。另一方面,菩萨能够“随顺俗谛而不厌倦”,同时“观第一义谛而不取证”[chunk:13772],并能“依二谛答”众生问难[chunk:13792]。 其三,世俗谛的局限性与依止第一义谛的必要性。虽然“世俗正见”是修行的基础[chunk:14863],但若要成就无上菩提,则必须依止第一义谛而非世谛[chunk:14863]。经中对此作了多重比喻:依第一义谛能速满一切智海,犹如大河水能满大海,而非小河(世谛)[chunk:14863];依第一义谛能令善根坚固,犹如须弥山王依大地而不依水(世谛)[chunk:14863];四念处等功德皆依第一义谛而得生长,犹如草木依大地而非草叶(世谛)[chunk:14863];依第一义谛能吹除恶见与烦恼,犹如猛风依虚空而非依地(世谛)[chunk:14863];依第一义谛菩提心能无惑修行,犹如依日光能见万物,而非依油灯小光(世谛)[chunk:14864]。 3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同部类及译本中,关于世俗谛的术语和名相呈现出明显的差异: - 二谛译名:《大宝积经》交替使用“世俗谛”[chunk:16105]、“世谛”[chunk:14887]、“俗谛”[chunk:16857],与之相对的则有“胜义谛”[chunk:16105]、“第一义谛”[chunk:18073]、“第一义”[chunk:16855]、“真谛”[chunk:17437]或“真”[chunk:16857];《大方等大集经》主要使用“世谛”或“俗谛”,常与“第一义谛”或“真谛”并称[chunk:13770, chunk:13772];《大般涅槃经》则通常称为“世谛”或“世法”[chunk:9106, chunk:9107]。 - 五蕴译名:《大宝积经》既使用“诸蕴”[chunk:16105]、“五受蕴”[chunk:16106],也使用了较为古雅的“色阴受想行识”、“色阴”[chunk:16869]或“诸阴”[chunk:16857];《大方等大集经》在论述相关法相时,使用的是“五阴”而非“五蕴”[chunk:13770, chunk:13772];《大般涅槃经》则使用“五阴”[chunk:9106]、“诸阴界入”[chunk:9106]及“五盛阴”[chunk:9107]。 - 有情译名:《大宝积经》使用“数取者”或“数取趣者”来指代补特伽罗[chunk:16115, chunk:16116];《大般涅槃经》则使用“某甲”、“我”、“众生”、“寿命”、“知见”、“丈夫”、“作者”、“受者”等世俗名言[chunk:9106]。 - 世法分类:《大般涅槃经》独有“五种世法”之说,即“名世”(如男女、瓶衣)、“句世”(如四句一偈)、“缚世”(如系结、合掌)、“法世”(如鸣搥集僧)及“执著世”(如见染衣者执著其为沙门)[chunk:9107]。 4. 与相关概念的关系 - 与第一义谛(胜义谛)的关系: 1. 二谛并立与法界超越:在《大宝积经》中,文殊师利指出“法界体性无有世谛、第一义谛”,超越了二谛的对立[chunk:14887]。而在《大般涅槃经》中,佛陀指出“世谛者即第一义谛”[chunk:9106],若能对五种世法心无颠倒、如实而知,则升华为第一义谛[chunk:9107]。 2. 了义与不了义的判准:《大宝积经》将二谛作为判教标准,明确指出“若诸经中说世俗谛,名不了义;说胜义谛,名为了义”[chunk:16115]。 - 与慈悲的关系: 《大般涅槃经》区分了“世谛慈”与“第一义慈”。凡夫的慈悲被界定为“世谛慈”,菩萨修行则需舍弃此世谛慈,获得不从缘得的“第一义慈”[chunk:9416]。 5. 代表性原文引用 - 《大寶積經》:“世間所有語言文字音聲假說,如是等相名世俗諦。”[chunk:16105] - 《大寶積經》:“佛為世諦如是說,世諦諸法不全無。”[chunk:16758] - 《大方等大集經》:“以世諦故假名諸法。”[chunk:12629] - 《大方等大集經》:“隨順俗諦而不厭倦,觀第一義諦而不取證。”[chunk:13772] - 《大般涅槃經》:“世諦者即第一義諦。”[chunk:9106] - 《大般涅槃經》:“有名無實,是名世諦。”[chunk:9106]

By Sutra

T0310 · 寶積部

在《T0310》中,“世俗谛”又常被称为“世谛”或“俗谛”[chunk:14887, chunk:16105, chunk:16857]。以下是该经对该概念的系统论述: 一、 核心定义与表述形式 经中明确定义“世俗谛”为“世間所有語言文字音聲假說,如是等相名世俗諦”[chunk:16105],其范畴涵盖了“一切世俗生死所行”[chunk:16855]。诸如“佛”、“菩提”、“菩萨”、“授记”以及“色陰受想行識”等名言,在本质上都属于“但名但用,但是世諦但是言說,但是施設所言”[chunk:16869]。 二、 世俗谛的教化作用与独特侧面 1. 如来悲愍施设:如来因悲愍一切众生,为了利益世间而宣说俗谛,以此向众生显示六趣等世间差别[chunk:16857]。菩萨摩诃萨为了修行般若波罗蜜多并成熟众生,在世俗谛中为众生说法而无有疲厌[chunk:16105, chunk:16106]。 2. 非完全虚无的因缘法:经中强调世俗谛并非完全不存在,即“佛為世諦如是說,世諦諸法不全無”[chunk:16758]。世俗谛是“因業所作事”与“因緣處”的体现,虽然佛陀了知这些因缘果报皆空、无自性,但仍在世俗谛中予以宣说[chunk:17393, chunk:17395, chunk:17397]。例如,众生所领纳的“諸受”即是“但世諦,第一義中無”[chunk:17295]。 3. 数取等名言的依凭:包括凡夫、圣者乃至如来等一切“數取者”的名言,皆是如来“依世俗諦為眾生說”的假名[chunk:16116]。 三、 世俗谛与第一义谛的关系及不应执著 1. 二谛并立与法界超越:如来所说之法分为“世諦、第一義諦”[chunk:18073](或称“世俗諦”与“勝義諦”[chunk:16105]、“世諦及真諦”[chunk:17437])。然而,在第一义中“都無有心繫縛、解脫”[chunk:14887],且“言說不可得”[chunk:17437]。文殊师利更指出,“法界體性無有世諦、第一義諦”,超越了二谛的对立[chunk:14887]。 2. 执著俗谛为颠倒:若众生对世俗谛的名言(如数取者)起执著,则不应依趣[chunk:16116]。智者不应对世俗言说及设施产生取著[chunk:16869]。若在俗谛中执以为“真”,或在无常、无我、不净中执着常、我、净、乐,皆属于“顛倒慧”[chunk:16857]。 3. 了义与不了义的判准:经中明确将二谛作为判教标准,指出“若諸經中說世俗諦,名不了義;說勝義諦,名為了義”[chunk:16115]。 四、 独特术语与用词特征 本经在论述该概念时,呈现出译语的多样性: - 二谛译名:交替使用“世俗諦”[chunk:16105]、“世諦”[chunk:14887]、“俗諦”[chunk:16857];与之相对的则有“勝義諦”[chunk:16105]、“第一義諦”[chunk:18073]、“第一義”[chunk:16855]、“真諦”[chunk:17437]或“真”[chunk:16857]。 - 五蕴译名:既使用“諸蘊”[chunk:16105]、“五受蘊”[chunk:16106],也使用了较为古雅的“色陰受想行識”或“色陰”[chunk:16869]、“諸陰”[chunk:16857]。 - 有情译名:使用“數取者”或“數取趣者”[chunk:16115, chunk:16116]来指代补特伽罗。

T0374 · 涅槃部

在《大般涅槃經》中,“世俗諦”通常被稱為“世諦”或“世法”。經文從二諦的關係、世諦的具體分類、獨特的術語表述,以及如來宣說世諦的方便法門等多個維度,對這一概念進行了深入的闡釋。 一、 世諦的核心定義與二諦關係 佛陀指出,世諦與第一義諦在本質上是相通的,佛言“世諦者即第一義諦” [chunk:9106]。然而,為了隨順眾生,如來以“善方便”宣說有二諦:世人所知道的稱為“世諦”,出世人所知道的則名為“第一義諦” [chunk:9106]。在認知層次上,僅僅“知世諦者”被稱為“中智”;而能夠“分別世諦,無量無邊不可稱計”,且這種分別非聲聞、緣覺所能了知者,則被稱為“上智” [chunk:9106]。 二、 世諦的具體內涵與獨特術語 經中通過對比第一義諦,具體界定了世諦的範疇,並使用了特定的譯語: 1. 有名無實:世諦屬於“有名無實”之法。例如凡夫隨“五陰”和合而稱呼的“某甲”(人名),即是世諦(此處經文使用“五陰”而非“五蘊”);此外,如我、眾生、壽命、知見、丈夫、作者、受者,以及熱時之炎、乾闥婆城、龜毛兔角、旋火之輪、諸陰界入等,皆名為世諦 [chunk:9106](此處使用“諸陰界入”)。 2. 五種世法:經中將世法細分為五種,即“名世”(如男女、瓶衣等物)、“句世”(如四句一偈)、“縛世”(如繫結、合掌)、“法世”(如鳴搥集僧、吹貝知時)及“執著世”(如見染衣者執著其為沙門)。若能對這五種世法心無顛倒、如實而知,則升華為第一義諦 [chunk:9107]。 3. 生滅與苦相:凡是有“燒、割、死、壞”的現象,以及“八苦相”(包括“五盛陰”苦,此處使用“五盛陰”而非“五取蘊”),皆屬於世諦 [chunk:9107]。此外,“依因父母和合而生” [chunk:9107]、“初出胎時”(名為“不生生”)與“世諦死時”(名為“生不生”) [chunk:9369],亦皆屬世諦的範疇。 4. 世諦之慈:凡夫的慈悲被界定為“世諦慈”,菩薩修行則需捨棄此世諦慈,獲得不從緣得的“第一義慈” [chunk:9416]。 三、 如來宣說世諦的方便與深意 世諦是如來度化眾生的重要工具。對於如來而言,“一切世諦,若於如來即是第一義諦”,諸佛是為了令眾生獲得第一義諦,才宣說世諦 [chunk:9212]。在具體說法中,如來常進行“第一義諦說為世諦”(如說自身有老病死)或“世諦說為第一義諦”的靈活互換 [chunk:9653]。然而,眾生往往難以理解這種“隨自意語”,甚至在顛倒時會產生“實是世諦見第一義諦、第一義諦見是世諦”的誤判 [chunk:9235, chunk:9685]。 值得注意的是,世諦的境界極為深奧。佛陀曾與彌勒菩薩共論世諦,而舍利弗等五百聲聞皆不能識知 [chunk:9212, chunk:9685]。在特定情況下,佛陀也會要求菩薩(如文殊師利)“應以世諦而解說之”,以避免直接進入甚深的第一義諦 [chunk:9366]。

T0397 · 大集部

《大集部·T0397》中,對「世俗諦」這一概念進行了深入的論述,主要使用「世諦」或「俗諦」這一術語,並常與「第一義諦」或「真諦」並稱。此外,該經在論述相關法相時,使用的是「五陰」而非「五蘊」[chunk:13770, 13772]。首先,經文定義了「俗諦」的內涵與本質。俗諦是指世間所使用的語言、文字以及假名法等[chunk:13772]。甚至在闡釋四聖諦時,宣說「苦諦、集諦、道諦」以及世間的語言文字,皆屬於「俗諦」的範疇[chunk:13772]。如來所宣說的言教之法亦名為「世諦」,如來雖真實覺知之,但世諦本質上「不出無有性,不可造作無有期」[chunk:12385]。菩薩正是「以世諦故假名諸法」[chunk:12629]。其次,經文闡述了菩薩對待「世諦」與「第一義諦」的修行態度。菩薩在修行中「不著二諦」[chunk:12168],既「不執著真諦、世諦」[chunk:12629],亦「不住知不知、識不識、世諦真諦」[chunk:13770]。在具體實踐中,菩薩能夠「隨順俗諦而不厭倦」或「隨俗不生厭倦」,同時「觀第一義諦而不取證」[chunk:13772]。在弘法利生時,菩薩能以微妙音聲「莊嚴俗諦第一義諦」,以智慧之箭射除邪見[chunk:13792],並能「依二諦答」眾生問難[chunk:13792]。最後,經文強調了在追求無上智慧時,世諦具有局限性,修行者必須依止「第一義諦」而非「世諦」。雖然「世俗正見」是基礎,部分為煩惱所縛的眾生甚至無法發起世俗正見[chunk:14863],但若要成就無上菩提,則必須依第一義諦。經中對此作了多重比喻:1. 充盈智海:依第一義諦能速滿一切智海,猶如五大河水能滿大海,而非小河(世諦)[chunk:14863];2. 堅固善根:依第一義諦能令一切善根堅固,猶如須彌山王依大地而不依水(世諦)[chunk:14863];3. 生長功德:四念處乃至十八不共法、大慈大悲等,皆依第一義諦而得生長,猶如草木依大地而非草葉(世諦)[chunk:14863];4. 吹盪煩惱:依第一義諦能吹除惡見與煩惱,猶如猛風依虛空而非依地(世諦)[chunk:14863];5. 消除迷惑:依第一義諦菩提心能無惑修行,猶如依日光能見萬物,而非依油燈小光(世諦)[chunk:14864]。因此,修行者應當捨離愛取,不作放逸,修第一義諦而非世諦,以此速滿六波羅蜜,成辦正覺[chunk:14864]。

Related