Dharma · AI Companion

世俗

saṃvṛti

依世间共识与名言施设的层面。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

「世俗」是逐重递升的相对项而非定点——每重之真谛降为次重之俗谛。初立第三重 取其名言施设义最成熟处;究竟第四重〔第四重:前三重二谛俱成俗谛,唯言忘虑绝为真〕。原「削足适履」感正由跨度消解:它不是钉在某重,而是随重滑动的位置词。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

世俗 (*Saṃvṛti* / Conventional Truth)

One-sentence definition: *Saṃvṛti* (世俗, conventional truth) refers to the relative existence and laws established within the phenomenal realm by conforming to worldly conventions, language, names, and dependent origination. Opposed to and yet unified with *Paramārtha* (勝義 / 第一義, ultimate truth), it reflects the provisional validity of cause, effect, and the elimination of afflictions.


这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept Is Saying)

In Western discourse or everyday language, "secular" or "conventional" often carries a tone of compromise, mundane triviality, or vulgarity. However, in Buddhist philosophy—particularly in canonical scriptures like the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (大寶積經)—*Saṃvṛti* (世俗 / 世諦 / 俗諦, conventional truth) is a precise, profound, and indispensably holy concept. It is not an error to be discarded, but the essential bridge connecting the confused state of sentient beings to the enlightened realm of the Tathāgata.

To understand *saṃvṛti*, one must examine its structure across four distinct layers defined in the canon:

1. The Necessity of Conforming to the Conventional Path (*Saṃvṛti-mārga* / 隨順世俗道)

The Buddha’s enlightenment and teaching are not floating castles divorced from daily existence. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* explicitly states that the Tathāgata’s realization of *Anuttara-samyak-saṃbodhi* (阿耨多羅三藐三菩提, Unsurpassed Complete Enlightenment) was accomplished precisely by "conforming to the conventional path" (隨順世俗道). If one does not conform to conventional reality, there is no way to manifest realization within the phenomenal world.

Within *saṃvṛti*, the distinctions of "appropriate cause/location" (處) and "inappropriate cause/location" (無處)—the entire framework of logic and causality—are established. Yet, true conformity differs from attachment: while conforming to *saṃvṛti*, a practitioner understands that within it, "not a single dharma is truly produced or truly comprehended" (於中無有少法而可生者而可了者).

2. The Conventional Basis of Practice and Liberation (斷惑證果的世俗依持性)

Central to Buddhist practice are concepts like "destroying afflictions" and "attaining sainthood." The sūtra clarifies that when the Buddha declares his "streams of taints are exhausted" (諸流已盡—ending the streams of desire, existence, ignorance, and views), this statement is made "based on conventional truth, not ultimate truth" (依世俗故非為勝義).

In the ultimate dimension (*Paramārtha* / 勝義), in the presence of noble wisdom (*āryajñāna* / 聖智), there is no entity that can be fully known, permanently abandoned, cultivated, or realized. Ultimate "exhaustion" or "cessation" (盡) is not the physical destruction of an object; it is *rūpa-svabhāva-kṣaya* (如實性盡, the realization of true empty nature)—the recognition that all phenomena are originally uncreated, unceasing, and undwelling. Thus, statements about destroying afflictions and attaining fruit are provisional, pedagogical tools (*Upāya* / 方便) grounded in *saṃvṛti*.

3. Phenomenal Causality, Feelings, and Samsara (諸受、業報與生死流轉)

The canon rigorously delineates where conventional reality applies: * Feelings (諸受): "All feelings exist only conventionally; in ultimate truth, they are absent" (諸受但世諦,第一義中無). Joy, grief, physical pain, and emotional pleasure are vividly felt in conventional experience, but possess no inherent, self-sustaining substance. * Karma and Cause-and-Effect (因果業報): From the ultimate perspective, past consciousness, future consciousness, karma, death, rebirth, and nirvana are "inherently empty of self-nature" (體性皆空). There is no enduring soul acting as the "agent of karma" (作業者) or the "receiver of retribution" (受報者). However, on the conventional level, karma and its fruits are never lost or corrupted (見所作業及受果報皆不失壞). Causality operates with unfailing precision.

4. The World as an Echo in a Valley (*Deep-Valley Sound* / 深谷聲)

To illustrate the nature of *saṃvṛti*, the sūtra provides a specific, precise canonical metaphor: "All worlds are like an echo in a deep valley" (一切世間如深谷聲).

Consider how an echo works: when you shout into a canyon, a sound reverberates clearly. The pitch, volume, and timing respond strictly to your voice and the canyon's contours (flawless conventional causality). Yet, if you hike into the valley to search for the "owner" or "physical body" of that echo, you will find nothing. The echo is vividly experienced, yet completely devoid of an independent self-entity (*svabhāva* / 自性).

The Buddha views the world "based on the reality of no self-nature" (依真無自性觀見世間), seeing that mundane attachments and the ultimate reality (*Dharmadhātu* / 法界) share "a non-dual, single essence" (不二無二體).


生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life)

To see how *saṃvṛti* operates, let us walk through three ordinary contemporary scenarios, mapping them step-by-step against classical definitions.

``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ THE TWO TRUTHS IN DAILY LIFE │ ├───────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Conventional Truth (世俗諦) │ Ultimate Truth (勝義諦) │ ├───────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Valid within relative rules │ • Uncreated, unceasing, empty of self- │ │ • Cause & effect never fail │ nature (體性皆空) │ │ • Like an echo in a valley │ • No fixed "agent" or "receiver" │ └───────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────┘ ```

Scenario 1: Performance Reviews, Mortgages, and Workplace Identity

* The Experience: You receive a quarterly review at work. Your manager gives you a low rating, citing missed key performance indicators (KPIs). Your heart sinks; you face potential bonus cuts, rendering your mortgage payment tight. * Mapping to Conventional Truth: This entire network of corporate rules, bank contracts, performance scores, and financial consequences belongs to *saṃvṛti*. "Karma and fruit are never lost or corrupted" (見所作業及受果報皆不失壞): if you miss deadlines (cause), your score drops and income fluctuates (effect). You cannot simply declare, "Money is empty!" and expect the bank to waive your payment. In *saṃvṛti*, actions have undeniable consequences. * Where People Misapply It: The error occurs when you reify (solidify) conventional labels into ultimate reality—believing that "Low Performer" or "Failure" is an intrinsic, permanent essence inside your soul. You forget the canyon metaphor: the bad review is an *echo* produced by specific conditions (market trends, team dynamics, personal fatigue). It functions conventionally, but it has no inherent, fixed self-nature (無自性).

Scenario 2: Intimate Relationships and Emotional Outbursts

* The Experience: During an argument, your partner says, "You never listen to me!" You instantly feel a sharp pang of anger and betrayal in your chest (諸受). * Mapping to Conventional Truth: The sūtra notes: "All feelings exist only conventionally; in ultimate truth, they are absent" (諸受但世諦,第一義中無). The sensation of anger, the elevated heart rate, and the urge to snap back are conventional realities arising from conditioned triggers. They feel 100% real to your nervous system. * Where People Misapply It: People often fall into two traps. The first is solidification: treating the felt emotion as an absolute truth ("I am broken, and my partner is evil"). The second is intellectual suppression: pretending the emotion doesn't exist by repeating spiritual mantras ("Pain is an illusion, so I shouldn't feel this"). The Buddha’s approach is to honor the conventional arising of feelings while recognizing their valley-echo nature—allowing the sensation to resonate and pass without constructing a tragic narrative around a "suffering self."

Scenario 3: Personal Growth and "Eliminating Bad Habits"

* The Experience: After months of therapy or meditation, you successfully quit doom-scrolling before sleep. You proudly tell a friend, "I have completely destroyed my addiction!" * Mapping to Conventional Truth: Your statement is a classic example of "依世俗故非為勝義" (based on conventional truth, not ultimate truth). On the conventional level, declaring "my habit is eliminated" is valid and encouraging; it reflects a real shift in behavioral cause and effect. * Where People Misapply It: If you treat "elimination" as an ultimate physical crushing of a monster called "Addiction," you will be devastated when an unexpected surge of stress triggers the urge again months later. In ultimate truth, afflictions were never solid "things" to begin with. True liberation is *rūpa-svabhāva-kṣaya* (如實性盡)—realizing that the urge, when inspected closely, is uncreated, unswallowed, and empty of substance.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

Contemporary culture constantly forces us into one of two unhelpful extremes: Nihilism (拨无因果—believing nothing matters, leading to cynicism and burnout) or Reification (执着实体—believing every social metric, self-image, and emotional wave is an absolute reality, leading to chronic anxiety).

Understanding *saṃvṛti* provides a crucial middle way (*Madhyamaka*):

``` [ Reification / Absolutism ] Treating conventional labels as eternal truths → Chronic anxiety, ego-defensiveness │ ▼ ┌───────────────────┐ │ THE MIDDLE WAY │ │ (Saṃvṛti & │ Navigating the world with │ Paramārtha) │ clarity and grace └───────────────────┘ ▲ │ [ Nihilism / Escapism ] Rejecting daily responsibilities and causality → Cynicism, spiritual bypass ```

1. Navigating the Algorithmic and Digital Realm

Consider modern software architecture or video games: * The Digital Analogy: In a game like *Civilization*, if your unit's health hits zero, it dies according to the code (conventional causality). Within the game's rules, the damage and loss are strictly real. But if you open the computer case, there are no miniature soldiers inside—only silicon chips, binary voltage shifts, and light emissions (ultimate emptiness). * The Life Application: Contemporary life is increasingly mediated by digital "rules"—credit scores, algorithmic feeds, social media likes, and professional titles. *Saṃvṛti* teaches us to play the game responsibly according to its rules without falling into the delusion that our digital avatar's stats define our ultimate worth.

2. Dialogue with Neuroscience and Science

Modern neuroscience uses functional MRI (fMRI) to show that pain, pleasure, and decisions correlate with neural firings and neurochemical releases. Science demonstrates that "pain" is not a mystical static entity, but a conditioned emergent phenomenon.

However, science has its limits: it often slips into physicalist reductionism—claiming that because pain correlates with brain signals, the brain alone is the absolute material reality. Buddhist philosophy uses the two truths to avoid this trap: neural firings and subjective experiences are both parts of *saṃvṛti* (dependent origination). Neither is an absolute, self-existent core. Buddhism honors scientific causality while pointing out that scientific models themselves are human cognitive constructs (*saṃvṛti*).


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications)

Misinterpretation 1: "Since conventional reality is empty, karma and moral rules don't matter." (把世俗当虚无)

* Clarification: This is the dangerous error of "denying causality" (撥無因果). The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* explicitly warns that in conventional truth, "karma and fruit are never lost or corrupted" (見所作業及受果報皆不失壞). Furthermore, the Buddha attained enlightenment *by conforming to the conventional path*. Ignoring moral causality in daily life while claiming to understand "ultimate emptiness" is not enlightenment; it is spiritual delusion.

Misinterpretation 2: "Conventional Truth and Ultimate Truth are two separate physical worlds." (世俗与胜义是两个割绝的世界)

* Clarification: They are not two different places (e.g., "Earth" vs. "Heaven" or "Samsara" vs. "Nirvana"). They are two dimensions of understanding the exact same reality (*Dharmadhātu* / 法界). The sūtra notes that earthly attachments and ultimate reality share "a non-dual, single essence" (不二無二體). Ultimate truth is simply the true, empty nature (*svabhāva-śūnyatā*) of conventional phenomena.

Misinterpretation 3: "Ultimate liberation means physically destroying conventional things." (胜义的“尽”是消灭外在事物)

* Clarification: People often assume that "ending suffering" or "exhausting taints" (諸流已盡) means blowing up worldly objects or wiping out thoughts. The sūtra clarifies that ultimate "exhaustion" is *rūpa-svabhāva-kṣaya* (如實性盡)—the shift in insight that sees things as they truly are: uncreated, unceasing, and inherently free. You do not need to destroy the valley; you simply stop taking the echo for a living voice.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在《大寶積經》(寶積部·《大寶積經》)的教义体系中,“世俗”(saṃvṛti)是一个至关重要的概念。它指的是在现象界中,随顺世间名相、语言、因缘而建立的相对存在与规律。世俗与“勝義”或“第一義”相对立而又相统一。世俗并非毫无意义的虚妄,而是如来成道、说法、度化众生的必要途径。在世俗的层面上,因果业报、生死流转、断惑证果等皆历历不爽,具有相对的真实性与不坏性;然而,若从胜义或第一义的绝对层面来观察,则一切法皆无自性、体性皆空,无有少法可生、可了、可得。因此,世俗是连接众生迷妄境界与如来觉悟境界的桥梁,修行者需通过对世俗现象的如实观察,不着世间,从而速得解脱。

二、主要阐述

《大寶積經》从多个维度对“世俗”这一概念进行了深入的阐述:

1. 如来成道与说法的世俗随顺性 如来的现证与教化并非脱离世俗的空中楼阁,而是必须依于世俗。经中指出,如来现证阿耨多罗三藐三菩提,正是“隨順世俗道”的结果。如果不能随顺世俗,则在现象界中就无从现证无上菩提。在世俗的层面上,诸法的“處”(合理性、因果定位)与“無處”(非理、无因果定位)都是随顺世俗而建立的。然而,这种随顺并非对世俗的执著,因为在随顺世俗的当下,修行者应当了知在其中“無有少法而可生者而可了者”。通过这种既随顺世俗又不为世俗所缚的智慧,修行者才能在诸法中精勤修行,速得解脱。

2. 断惑证果等名相的世俗依持性 在佛教修行中,诸如断除烦恼、证得圣果等说法,是佛陀教化的核心。然而《大寶積經》指出,这些说法同样是依于世俗而立,而非胜义的终极真实。例如,如来宣称自己“諸流已盡”(即已经永断了欲流、有流、無明流、見流等一切烦恼与习气)。经中明确指出,这种“諸流已盡”的宣说,是“依世俗故非為勝義”。因为在“勝義”的绝对境界中,圣智面前并没有任何一法是真正可以被遍知、被永斷、被修習或被作證的。胜义中的“盡”并非物质或现象的消灭,而是“如實性盡”,即诸法本自无为、无生无灭、无住的本来状态。因此,断惑证果的言说只是世俗的方便。

3. 诸受、因果业报与生死流转的世俗存在性 经中对现象界的核心要素进行了世俗与第一义的划界。首先,对于众生的感受,经中明确指出:“諸受但世諦,第一義中無”。这意味着诸受在世俗经验中是存在的,但在第一义中则无实体。其次,对于因业力所作的一切事相以及众生所处的因缘,皆属于“俗諦”的范畴。佛陀虽然悉知这些俗谛现象,但同时宣说它们皆无自性。再者,在论及众生的生死流转与业报受持时,经中展现了辩证的观点:从第一义的角度来看,后识、初识、业、死、受生、世间乃至涅槃等,其“體性皆空”,并没有一个真实的实体从前世过渡到后世,也“無有作業者、亦無受報者”;然而,在世俗的层面上,“見所作業及受果報皆不失壞”。这一切因果历历的现象,“但隨世俗故有,非第一義也”。

4. 世间的本质与佛陀的如实观照 对于“世間”这一世俗的具体显现,经中指出其本质犹如“深谷聲”,虽然有响,但并无实体。修行者应当如是观察世间,从而不执著于世间。佛陀在观照世间时,是“依真無自性”来观见的。佛陀悉知众生在世间中的相续、所行、诸趣,以及众生在世间中的流转与修习。在佛陀的现见中,“欲及世間親”这二者皆名法界,具有“不二無二體”的本质。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大寶積經》(寶積部·《大寶積經》)中,对于“世俗”这一概念的探讨,采用了多种不同的术语和表述方式,这些术语在不同的语境中各有侧重,反映了译者在翻译过程中的细微差别:

1. “世俗”与“世俗道”:主要用于描述如来成道、说法的随顺过程。如指出成道是“隨順世俗道”的结果,断惑是“依世俗故”。 2. “世諦”:主要用于与“第一義”进行直接的对举,用以说明某种特定现象(如“受”)的相对性。如经中云“諸受但世諦,第一義中無”。 3. “俗諦”:主要用于描述因缘、业力所作的事相。如指出因业所作的一切事相及因缘所处皆属“俗諦”。 4. “世間”:在涉及众生的流转、修习、佛陀的观照以及世间的虚妄本质时,经中更倾向于使用“世間”一词。例如,将世间比喻为“深谷聲”,论述佛陀观见世间“依真無自性”,以及佛陀悉知众生在世间中的相续、所行、诸趣、流转与修习等。

这些不同的用词(世俗、世俗道、世諦、俗諦、世間)虽然在字面上有所不同,但它们在《大寶積經》中共同构建了一个完整的现象界维度,与“勝義”、“第一義”或“真無自性”的本体界维度形成鲜明的对比。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“勝義/第一義”的关系 这是最核心的一对关系。世俗与胜义(第一义)并非割裂的两个世界,而是对同一法界的不同层次的认识。在世俗中,有生灭、有因果、有断惑、有诸受;而在胜义中,则无生无灭、无作业者、无受报者,体性皆空。世俗是胜义的显现,胜义是世俗的实相。

2. 与“無自性/空”的关系 世俗的存在以“無自性”和“空”为前提。正因为诸法无自性,所以才能随顺因缘而有世俗的种种显现。佛陀“依真無自性”来观见世间,并宣说属于俗谛的因业所作事相皆无自性。世间的体性皆空,犹如无实体的“深谷聲”。

3. 与“法界”的关系 世俗现象与法界在终极意义上是无二无别的。经中指出,“欲及世間親”皆名法界,具有“不二無二體”的本质。这表明世俗并非在法界之外,其本质即是法界本身。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 随顺世俗成道:“隨順世俗道。若不隨順世俗。無有能證阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者。……若隨順世俗。於中無有少法而可生者而可了者。” 2. 断惑的世俗性:“如來說我諸流已盡。依世俗故非為勝義。……勝義之中無有一法。於聖智前可遍知。可永斷。可修習。可作證。勝義盡者。即是如實性盡。無為無生無滅無住。” 3. 诸受与世谛:“諸受但世諦,第一義中無。” 4. 俗谛与无自性:“因業所作一切事相及因緣所處。皆是俗諦。佛悉知之。亦說皆無自性。” 5. 业报与世俗:“後識初識業死受生世間涅槃。體性皆空。無有一法從前世至於後世。亦無有作業者。亦無受報者。而見所作業及受果報皆不失壞。但隨世俗故有。非第一義也。” 6. 世间如响:“一切世間如深谷聲。” 7. 佛观世间:“依真無自性觀見世間。”

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》對「世俗」有數層相互關聯而須辨別的表述。其一,世俗是依世間共許與名言施設而成立的層面:蘊等諸法皆無自性,唯由世間共許為有;自宗所安立的世俗依「名言量」成立,並非依觀察真實義的理智成立。經中引「世間說有者我亦說有,世間說無者我亦說無」,說明有無、生住滅及勝劣等施設,皆依世間共許的名言而立。

其二,本經又以「世俗」翻譯梵語中具有「能障」之義的詞,特指無明愚癡:無明令眾生不見諸法實性,於無自性法增益自性,障蔽真義,遂使青等虛偽諸法現為實有。此義是說諸法在何種世俗心前被安立為諦,並非泛說一切世俗。經中特別區分前後兩種用法:一是諸法生等「世俗中有」之世俗;一是實執、能障真義,使諸法現為諦實的世俗。後者構成「世俗諦」之所以為諦的所對心識。

其三,本經不把凡由錯亂識所見者一概立為世俗有。世俗須由名言量安立;惡宗所計的自性、無明習氣所損心識執取的境,以及幻事、陽燄、影像被誤認為實象馬、實水、實質等,在世間世俗中亦非有。另一方面,影像、谷響、幻事等所見顯現仍可成立:如實質雖無而影像是有,自相雖無而青等是有。故本經以「名言中有者,要由正量之所成立」限定世俗施設,而非以亂識顯現本身為準。

其四,世俗有不等於自性有。色等法於勝義與世俗二諦中俱無自性;本經在名言中亦破「自相生」「自性生」,但不破依緣而立的總生。無明緣行等是約世俗而說,即依「此緣有此法生」,並不因此承認自生、他生、共生或無因生等四邊。故「勝義中無、世俗中有」所說的有,是緣起假立之有,不是實體或自相成立之有。

其五,本經常用「世間世俗」「世間名言」「世間共許」「名言量」「唯假名安立」等詞表達此層面。車與有情的譬喻顯示:以七相推求,車在真實勝義或世間世俗中皆無可得;若不推求假立義,則可依輪等支分、依世間名言安立為車,並成立其作用。經中因此明言「莫壞世間許世俗」:世俗雖經觀察無所得,仍可依共許施設,不能因無自性而破壞日常名言與作用。

其六,本經亦以夢、乾闥婆城、陽燄水相、鏡中影像等說明:色等雖自性不生,仍是世間共見之境,與世間從不見的石女兒不同。假有亦不須以某種實物為最終所依;如影像依假有形質、屋依假有柱等、林依假有樹等施設,一切假有法可以假法為依。這構成本經論世俗的獨特側面:既不許任何微塵許的自相,又能安立因果、名言及一切作用。

辨了不了義善說藏論B0048 · 藏傳論典部

《辨了不了義善說藏論》以「世俗」、「名言」、「世間名言」及「世名」等語,表述依世間共識與假名施設而成立的層面。論中轉述一種二諦分辨:一切法「於勝義無,於名言有」;並指出問「何為世俗」,是問世俗諦,即諸法對何種世俗認識而被安立為諦實,並非追問「名言有」所在的某一處所。 論中尤其辨明,世俗假立不可等同於在無自性法中執著自性。後者是實執,其所執境即使在名言中亦被說為無。由此可見,世俗並非把本無的自性施設為實有,而是名言安立本身;若說某法僅由名言世俗說有,亦須有其所依處,不能成為全無所依的言說。 依論所引《無盡慧經》之義,顯示世俗的經說屬不了義:以種種字句、種種名言宣說我、有情、命者、作者、受者等,或觀待作者而說作用與所作事,皆是世俗層面的顯示。此處世俗的特色,在於施設多樣名相及相待關係;與之相對,顯示勝義則說空、無生、無有情等離戲論義。 論又說,從種生芽、由黑白業生苦樂等內容,雖可由正量成立其如言之義,仍非「依於勝義增上」而說,故屬須向更深義理引釋的世俗言說。於辨別了義與不了義時,世俗遂成為不了義所詮的層面,但論中特別說明:不了義並非毫無意義,而是其義是否尚須引向餘義解釋。 在中觀語境中,論反覆採用「於名言有」、「名言幻有」、「世俗有」等表述,並與「於勝義無」、「勝義無性」並列。論記述諸師共同說名言中如幻而有、勝義中無自性,同時強調名言有並不表示諸法在世俗中具有自相;若於名言仍安立自相,便不是此處所說的純粹假名施設。 論對世俗成立方式的核心說明,是生、滅、有、無、優劣等「皆由名言增上」安立。世間雖說種子生苗芽,卻不尋求名言所指究竟從自生、他生等;這種成立稱為「世間名言無觀察而立」。補特伽羅與諸法亦依同一方式說為「勝義無、世俗有」,因果等則「唯於假名」中安立。 論進一步以「世間名言無須審細觀察」說明世俗的認知方式:日常名言所取,不以觀察真實自性為成立條件。若追求假名之義,要求找到一個以自相成立的施設處,便超出了世俗無觀察安立的範圍。因此,本論記錄此概念時宜保留其特有術語組合:「世俗」、「名言」、「世間名言」、「世名力」、「名言增上」、「世俗有」及「無觀察而立」。

菩提道次第廣論B0067 · 藏傳論典部

《菩提道次第廣論》以「世俗」指名言安立及世間共許的層面,常與「勝義」「真實」「法性」相對而說。論中引《讚應讚》「不棄捨法性,亦隨順世俗」,說明雖於法性中定解諸相所執之事微塵許亦不可得,仍隨順世俗中內外因緣各別生果;二者並不相違。

論中又從教說內容區分二諦:詮顯勝義者名為了義,安立、顯示世俗者名為不了義;以種種名言宣說我、有情、命者、補特伽羅、作者、受者等,即屬世俗施設,而顯示空性、無相、無願、無生、無我等則屬勝義之說。 相應地,「生等」被判為世俗,「無我、無生等」被說為勝義;但論中特別指出,了義經遮生等時應有勝義簡別,不可據此執為世俗中全無生或補特伽羅。

《菩提道次第廣論》論世俗時,著重「世俗有」與「自性有」的區別。中觀論師許業果、前後世等世俗有,卻不許其自性有;若連世俗中的業果等也不承認,便不能與畢竟斷無相區別。論中所用的重要表述是「無性」「緣起」與「世俗有」同時成立。 觀察真實的正理所破者,是實有、自性生及境上有性,並非破除眼等所作、緣起或業異熟之體;若以抉擇勝義之理妨害自宗所立世俗,即使二諦的安立自相違。

論中解釋「我就世說有」時,明言「就世」不是僅隨他人而說,而是依無損的名言識安立一切世俗義;中觀師自身亦有名言量。其慣用句式為「於勝義無,然世俗有」:前後「無」「有」所指不同,世俗有並不等於自相有。 因此,論中雖說色、聲等虛妄、無自相,仍不表示全無世俗眼等;所遮的是由自相或無錯亂現量所成立的色等,而非名言所安立的世俗法。

在補特伽羅的說明中,論中採用「依諸蘊,說世俗有情」的術語:如依車輪、車軸等支分假名為車,亦依諸蘊假名為「我」或「有情」;車與我在一、異等七相中皆無自性,故說為唯假有。 然而七相推求雖不得車的自性,車之名言仍不可遮止。論中以「莫壞世許諸世俗」表明:勝義中支與有支皆不可得,世俗中支與有支則皆可安立;由此既破自性增益,也不損壞名言中的能作、所作與緣起。

Related