Dharma · AI Companion

集智

samudaya-jñāna

如实了知苦集之理的智慧AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

In mainstream discourse, Buddhist practices are frequently framed through a single lens: "letting go" or "eradicating desire." We often think that spiritual progress simply means purging the mind of toxic thoughts, walking away from attachments, and achieving a quiet, undisturbed state.

However, in the Mahayana tradition—specifically within the classical canon of the *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dà Bǎojī Jīng* 大寶積經, translated by Bodhiruci)—the wisdom concerning the second Noble Truth (*Samudaya*, the origin of suffering) unfolds into a far richer, more dynamic landscape. This wisdom is known as **Jí Zhì (集智, *Samudaya-jñāna*)**—the "Wisdom of the Origin" or the "Wisdom of Accumulation."

*Jí Zhì* is not merely an intellectual diagnosis of why we suffer, nor is it a passive escape from worldly life. In the Mahayana Bodhisattva path, *Jí Zhì* bridges two seemingly opposite worlds: it completely eradicates the hidden roots of craving and delusion, yet simultaneously propels the practitioner to actively accumulate vast roots of goodness (*jījí shàngēn* 積集善根) in the world without clinging to any of them.


What Is This Concept Expressing? (这个概念在说什么)

To understand *Jí Zhì*, we must first place it within its foundational canonical structure. The Sanskrit word *Samudaya* (集) literally carries two complementary meanings: "arising/originating" (how suffering originates through cause and effect) and "accumulation/gathering" (how causes and virtues are brought together).

In the *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra*, *Jí Zhì* is articulated across three distinct yet deeply integrated dimensions:

1. Eradicating Tainted Love and Seeing the Middle Way of Conditioning

At its core, *Jí Zhì* is defined as "the wisdom that eternally eradicates all tainted love" (*yú zhū rǎn’ài yǒng duànmiè zhì* 於諸染愛永斷滅智). "Tainted love" (*rǎn’ài* 染愛) refers to craving conditioned by ignorance—the sticky, possessive attachment that binds us to cyclic existence.

Furthermore, *Jí Zhì* penetrates the true nature of cause and effect. In observing the conditions that give rise to conditioned phenomena (*yǒuwéi shēngyuán* 有為生緣), a Bodhisattva discerns that "this existence" (*cǐ yǒu* 此有) is "neither inherently existent nor non-existent" (*fēi yǒu fēi wú* 非有非無). Suffering does not arise from a concrete, permanent "self" or entity, nor is it a random, void vacuum. It arises dependent on conditions. Seeing this conditioned, empty, and Middle Way reality of origins is the essence of *Jí Zhì*.

2. Thorough Understanding of the Truth of Origin (*Samudaya-satya*)

*Jí Zhì* takes as its object the Noble Truth of Origin (*Jí Shèngdì* 集聖諦 or *Kǔ Jí Shèngdì* 苦集聖諦). The *sūtra* explicitly defines the Truth of Origin as "the cause of the Five Grasped Aggregates, namely latency, craving, and wrong views" (*wǔ shòu yùn yīn, suímián ài jiàn* 五受蘊因,隨眠愛見).

Here, precision in classical canonical terminology is crucial: * **The Five Grasped Aggregates (*wǔ shòu yùn* 五受蘊):** This is the outcome of suffering. It includes physical form (*sè* 色, all matter including the physical body and external environment), feelings (*shòu* 受, sensations of pleasure, pain, or neutral state), perceptions (*xiǎng* 想, the cognitive faculty of identifying and labeling features), mental formations (*xíng* 行, volitional activities, intention, and mental impulses), and consciousness (*shí* 識, primary awareness). * **Latency, Craving, and Views (*suímián ài jiàn* 隨眠愛見):** "Latency" (*suímián* / *anuśaya*) refers to deep-seated, dormant afflictive tendencies lying beneath conscious awareness. "Craving" (*ài*) is the unquenchable drive to grasp or reject. "Views" (*jiàn*) are rigid conceptual frameworks, especially the false view of a solid self.

*Jí Zhì* means that when faced with these hidden roots of craving and views, the Bodhisattva has "no additive proliferation, no grasping, no delusion, and possesses clear, penetrating understanding" (*wú yǒu zēngyì, wú qǔ wú mí, míngliǎo tōngdá* 無有增益,無取無迷,明了通達).

3. The Bodhisattva's Active Accumulation and Non-Realization

This is where Mahayana *Jí Zhì* diverges profoundly from the Theravāda (Śrāvakayāna) understanding: * **Accumulation of Good Roots (*jījí shàngēn* 積集善根):** When Manjuśrī Bodhisattva explains the nature of "Bodhisattva Wisdom," he specifically clarifies *Jí Zhì* as "the accumulation of wholesome roots." While eradicating *bad* causes (afflictions), the Bodhisattva actively gathers *good* causes (compassion, patience, generosity). * **Non-Realization / Non-Attainment (*bù zuòzhèng* 不作證):** A Śrāvaka practitioner seeks to realize the cessation of origins immediately to escape rebirth. A Bodhisattva, despite having fully understood and mastered *Jí Zhì*, intentionally "does not realize final cessation" (*bù zuòzhèng*) for the sole purpose of remaining in the world to mature sentient beings (*chéngshū zhū zhòngshēng* 成熟諸眾生). * **Non-Attachment (*wú suǒ zhùzhuó* 無所住著):** Even while accumulating limitless virtue and establishing noble truths, the Bodhisattva remains completely unattached to the very concept of "truth" or "wisdom." * Non-Duality of Delusion and Wisdom: In the advanced perspective of the *sūtra*, it is declared that "offering to delusion/ignorance is offering to Jí Zhì" (*gōngyǎng chī, jí gōngyǎng jízhì* 供養痴,即供養集智). Ignorance (*chī*) is the raw material of delusion; when fully illuminated by non-dual wisdom, the very mechanism of delusion is seen as empty, transforming into the doorway of all-encompassing wisdom (*dharani*).


A Walkthrough in Daily Life (生活里的走查)

To see how *Jí Zhì* operates, let us walk through a common contemporary scenario: a high-stakes project at work or a tense dynamic in a relationship.

Most people mistake spiritual practice as either "suppressing bad emotions" or "thinking positive thoughts." *Jí Zhì* works entirely differently. It is an active, real-time diagnostic and transformation process.

Step 1: Mapping the Aggregates vs. The Origin

Imagine you receive an abrupt, critical email from a colleague or partner. 1. **Form (*Sè* 色):** The illuminated smartphone screen, the glowing letters, your elevated heart rate, and tight shoulders. (Crucial distinction: *Sè* is not just your inner body; it includes the external physical email and room). 2. **Feeling (*Shòu* 受):** An immediate, sharp unpleasant sensation (*kǔ shòu* 苦受). 3. **Perception (*Xiǎng* 想): The cognitive brain instantly registers the signal and labels it: "An attack," "Injustice," " disrespectful behavior." 4. Formations (*Xíng* 行): The volitional surge—an impulse to type a furious reply, defend yourself, or emotionally shut down. 5. Consciousness (*Shí* 識):** The primary awareness experiencing this entire mental event.

Step 2: The Infiltration of Latent Craving and Views (*Suímián Ài Jiàn*)

Up to this point, the Five Aggregates are simply functioning as conditioned phenomena. Suffering (*Kǔ*) actually erupts when **latent tendencies (*suímián*)** ignite: * **Wrong View (*Jiàn* 見):** An implicit, rigid belief: *"My ego/reputation must be preserved at all costs."* * **Craving (*Ài* 愛):** Craving for approval, or craving to eliminate the uncomfortable feeling (*vibhava-taṇhā*).

Without *Jí Zhì*, you add layer upon layer of narrative ("They always do this," "I am completely ruined"). This is what the *sūtra* calls "proliferation/additive interpretation" (*zēngyì* 增益).

Step 3: Applying *Jí Zhì* (The Real-Time Diagnostic)

When *Jí Zhì* arises, you do not suppress the anger, nor do you act on it. Instead: * Tracing the Origin: You clearly see: "The painful feeling (*Shòu*) is not the primary cause of my suffering; the *origin* (*Jí*) is my latent craving for ego-validation and my rigid view of how things 'should' be." * **Observing Non-Is / Non-Is Not (*Fēi Yǒu Fēi Wú*):** You observe the arising anger. Is it a solid, permanent entity? No, it depended on reading that specific line of text (*fēi yǒu*). Is it completely non-existent? No, your heart is beating fast (*fēi wú*). Seeing its conditioned, empty nature breaks its emotional grip.

Step 4: The Bodhisattva Shift—Accumulating Virtue Without Attachment

Here lies the most common misstep for modern practitioners: stopping at passive detachment.

A person operating purely on an incomplete understanding might say, *"Everything is empty, so I won't reply to the email, nor will I care about the project or the person."* This is a complete misinterpretation.

*Jí Zhì* in the Mahayana framework directs you to **accumulate good roots (*jījí shàngēn*): 1. You step forward to solve the project's actual problem with clarity, patience, and skill (accumulating wisdom and compassionate action). 2. You respond with kindness and firmness, addressing the issue without attacking the person (accumulating ethical roots). 3. Yet, after sending the email, you have "no attachment to virtue or non-virtue"** (*bù zhízhuó shànfǎ yǔ bù shànfǎ* 不執著善法與不善法). You do not sit around obsessing over whether they think you are a "saint" or a "good person." Because you do not cling to the merit of being a "good practitioner," craving completely extinguishes (*pǐ zhū ài miè* 彼諸愛滅).


Why Modern People Need *Jí Zhì* (当代人为什么需要它)

In an era dominated by algorithmic optimization, social comparison, and constant sensory overload, modern humans suffer acutely from what can be called "Unexamined Accumulation."

1. From "Symptom Management" to "Root Diagnostics"

Modern self-help and popular psychological hacks often focus entirely on managing the *effects* of suffering (the Aggregates): taking a bath to soothe unpleasant feelings, using productivity tools to organize chaotic thoughts, or venting to release tension.

While helpful, these methods treat symptoms. *Jí Zhì* provides a radically deep diagnostic framework. It asks: *What latent craving (*suímián*) is feeding this anxiety? What underlying narrative of self-worth am I trying to protect?* By cutting off the supply line at the origin (*Jí*), suffering collapses naturally.

2. Resolving the Tension Between "Action" and "Detachment"

Contemporary professionals often feel torn between two extreme worldviews: * The Hyper-Achiever Mindset: "I must constantly construct, hustle, and accumulate status, wealth, and impact." (Result: Burnout, intense anxiety, fear of failure). * The Nihilistic / 'Lying Flat' Mindset: "Nothing matters, desire causes suffering, so I will disengage from ambition entirely." (Result: Apathy, loss of meaning).

*Jí Zhì* offers a profound middle path. It explicitly tells us that spiritual maturity requires actively accumulating good roots—building meaningful work, helping others, cultivating skills, creating value—while maintaining zero internal attachment (*wú suǒ zhùzhuó*) to the outcomes or self-image. You act with maximum engagement, yet rest in total inner freedom.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications (常见误读与澄清)

Misreading 1: "Is *Jí Zhì* just a synonym for the Four Noble Truths' second truth?"

Clarification: In foundational Buddhism, *Samudaya-jñāna* (集智) refers specifically to the direct realization of the cause of suffering (craving and ignorance) to eradicate it and enter *Nirvāṇa*.

However, in the Mahayana *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra*, *Jí Zhì* expands its scope. It encompasses not only the eradication of latent craving, but also the **active accumulation of wholesome roots (*jījí shàngēn*), the Middle Way observation of "neither existence nor non-existence," and the deliberate choice "not to realize final cessation" (*bù zuòzhèng*)** so that the practitioner remains engaged in the world to help others.

Misreading 2: "Does 'Accumulating Good Roots' mean building up spiritual ego or merit points?"

Clarification: No. The *sūtra* explicitly warns against this trap. If you accumulate good deeds while secretly clinging to the identity of "a good, spiritual person," that very identity becomes a new form of latent craving (*suímián ài jiàn*). The *sūtra* points out that true liberation occurs when one "does not cling to wholesome or unwholesome phenomena" (*bù zhízhuó shànfǎ yǔ bù shànfǎ*), leading to the total quietude of craving (*ài miè* 愛滅). You accumulate good roots naturally, like planting trees, without demanding that the forest bear your name.

Misreading 3: "Does 'Offering to Delusion is Offering to Jí Zhì' mean we should indulge our ignorance?"

Clarification: Absolutely not. This statement (*gōngyǎng chī, jí gōngyǎng jízhì* 供養痴,即供養集智) represents an advanced non-dual observation, not a license for reckless behavior.

It means that ignorance (*chī*) has no independent, solid self-nature. When a practitioner exposes ignorance to the piercing light of *Jí Zhì*, they realize that delusion itself is empty of inherent existence. The very energy that once drove delusion is transformed into clear awareness. You "offer" or honor ignorance not by indulging it, but by penetrating its empty essence and realizing that afflictions and awakening share the exact same ultimate reality (*Tathatā*).


Summary

*Jí Zhì* is neither a cold, analytical breakdown of suffering nor a passive withdrawal from the world. It is the vast, resilient wisdom of a Bodhisattva: a intellect capable of seeing through the subtle, hidden threads of delusion, coupled with a warm, boundless heart that tirelessly gathers every seed of goodness for the benefit of all beings—all while walking lightly upon the earth, completely unattached, free, and at peace.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 在大乘佛教经典《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志译)中,“集智”(samudaya-jñāna)是菩萨通达“谛法善巧”的核心智慧之一。它不仅指对痛苦生起之因(集)的如实了知与断除,更在大乘菩萨道的背景下被赋予了独特的修行实践意义。具体而言,集智的核心要义包括:其一,它是“于诸染爱永断灭智”;其二,它是观察有为生缘“非有非无”中道实相的智慧;其三,它是菩萨为了“积集善根”而发起的大悲智慧。这三重维度共同构成了集智在大乘经典中的核心内涵。

二、 主要阐述 《大寶積經》从多个角度对“集智”及与之紧密相关的“集圣谛”、“苦集圣谛”进行了深入的阐述: 1. 断除染爱与了知因缘:集智的首要功能是断除导致生死流转的根本因——染爱。经中明确将“于诸染爱永断灭智”界定为集智。同时,集智表现为对因缘的深刻观察。针对“有为生缘”,菩萨能够观察到“此有”呈现出“非有非无”的实相,这种超越两边的中道观察智慧,亦被称为集智。 2. 如实了知集圣谛:集智的认知对象是“集圣谛”或“苦集圣谛”。经中指出,“集圣谛者”即是“五受蕴因,随眠爱见”。菩萨在面对这一因法时,能够做到对“若爱若见”皆“无有增益,无取无迷,明了通达”。此外,对于“若从是因诸蕴集起皆是集谛”的因果规律,菩萨亦能做到“如实了知”。 3. 积集善根的菩萨智:与声闻乘偏重于个人断惑不同,大乘《大寶積經》在阐释“菩萨智”时,特别将“集智”的独特侧面解释为“积集善根故”。这表明集智不仅是消极地断除恶因,更是积极地积集一切善法、成就菩提的智慧。 4. 不作证与无所住著:在修行实践中,菩萨虽然以智慧明了通达包括“集智”在内的四谛,但为了“成熟诸众生”的缘故,选择“不作证”。同时,菩萨虽能善于建立谛法,但对于“谛智”本身“无所住著”,这才是真正的“谛法善巧”。 5. 圆融的供养观:经中提出了一种极为圆融的观点,即“供养痴,即供养集智”,并以此供养成就“总持门”。这体现了在大乘圆教视角下,烦恼与菩提、痴与集智之间的不二关系。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在《大寶積經》(《大寶積經》)的译文中,关于该概念的术语呈现出多样化的特征,反映了译者在不同语境下的用词选择: 1. 智慧与真谛的术语交替:针对智慧本身,译文主要使用“集智”;而针对该智慧所观察的真谛对象,则交替使用“集圣谛”、“苦集圣谛” 以及简称为“集谛”。 2. 名相的使用习惯:在涉及佛教基本名相时,本经在指代集谛所依的苦果时,使用了“五受蕴”(而非其他译本中常见的“五阴”),同时也使用“诸蕴” 进行简述。这种用词体现了唐代译经(菩提流志译)在名相统一性上的特点。

四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与“苦、灭、道”三智的关系:集智是四圣谛智慧(苦智、集智、灭智、道智)的重要组成部分。菩萨通达谛法善巧,必须平等观察四谛。然而,菩萨的集智与声闻的集智不同,声闻以断集证灭为期,而菩萨虽明达集智,却“不作证”,以便留惑润生、成熟众生。 2. 与“染爱”及“随眠爱见”的关系:染爱与随眠爱见是集谛的核心内容,也是集智所要断除和通达的对象。集智即是“于诸染爱永断灭智”,对“随眠爱见”做到“无有增益,无取无迷,明了通达”。 3. 与“善法”及“爱灭”的关系:经中指出,由于不执著善法与不善法,使得“彼诸爱灭”,如来将这种“善法所断”的境界,以异名示说为“集圣谛”。这说明集智不仅指向对恶因的断除,也包含对善法不执著而达到爱灭的深层智慧。

五、 代表性原文引用 1. “于诸染爱永断灭智,是名集智。……彼诸菩萨虽以智慧明了通达,为成熟诸众生故而不作证。” 2. “集圣谛者,谓五受蕴因,随眠爱见。彼于若爱若见无有增益,无取无迷,明了通达。” 3. “有为生缘,此有非有非无,是名集智。若从是因诸蕴集起皆是集谛,如实了知。……虽能建立,于谛无著,是名谛法善巧。” 4. “积集善根故,是菩萨智。” 5. “供养痴,即供养集智,以此供养成就总持门。” 6. “不执著善法与不善法,使得彼诸爱灭,如来将这种善法所断的境界,以异名示说为集圣谛。”

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》論「集智」,散見於三處脈絡,各有側重。

一、緣起性空下的集聖諦。經中以緣起門統攝四諦,謂「一切諸法如來悉知,以緣起門開示宣說」,而緣起本身「虛妄不實,自性本性皆悉空寂」。在此框架下,集諦的建立方式是:眾生若執著善法,則不善法亦隨之而執,由執不善法故生諸苦惱,佛以異名說為苦聖諦;反之,「由不執著善不善故,彼諸愛滅,如來於此善法所斷,異名示說為集聖諦」。此處集諦的核心不在「集起」之積極義,而在「愛滅」與「善法所斷」——執著斷則愛滅,愛滅即是集諦之所顯。經文繼以「知苦、斷集、證滅、修道」四字綱要收束四諦,並強調「此苦無有,以世俗故假名施設」,無明等一切「皆是無智攀緣」,於無智中亦「無有少攀緣可取」。是故集諦在本經中並非實有之集起,而是依世俗假名施設、本性空寂的方便言說。

二、「供養癡即供養集智」之不思議門。經中有一長段排比,以「如是供養癡,即供養佛法」起,依次將供養癡等同於供養法性、真如、無生、無滅、無盡、寂靜、流轉、苦等,而後列「供養苦智」「供養集智」「供養滅智」「供養道智」「供養法智」「供養類智」「供養無生智」「供養盡智」,結以「成就總持門」。此處「集智」與苦智、滅智、道智並列為四諦智,又與法智、類智、無生智、盡智等聲聞觀智同出,而統攝於「供養癡」這一悖論式表述之下。其意謂癡與智本無二性,供養癡即是供養一切智,成就總持門。集智在此並非獨立的觀照對象,而是與諸智平等無別、同歸法性的一環。

三、文殊師利所說菩薩智中的集智。商主天子問「何等是菩薩智」,文殊答以「苦智,不厭諸蘊故。集智,積集善根故。滅智,示有生故。道智,離惡道故」。此處集智的定義極具特色:不是觀苦之集起、不是斷煩惱之集,而是「積集善根」。這與聲聞四諦觀中集智偏重「知集、斷集」的取向不同,本經將集智轉為菩薩積極積聚善根的面向。同段又廣列因智、緣智、佛智、緣生智、蘊智、界智、處智,乃至十力智等,集智居四諦智第二位,為菩薩智整體架構中的一環。

術語方面,本經一律用「集智」「集聖諦」,未見異稱;四諦智的排列固定為苦智、集智、滅智、道智。值得注意的是,本經以「異名」一詞反覆標示四諦的施設性質——「佛以異名於此示說」「如來於此異名示說」「如來於此異名言說」,強調四諦(含集諦)皆是假名施設而非實法,這構成《大寶積經》論集智時最鮮明的般若底色。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》於十智體系中論「集智」,其核心定義為:「集智名知一切法離,無有和合。」 此即如實了知苦集之理的智慧——非僅知因緣聚散之表象,而是徹見一切法本無真實和合,離於聚集之相。此定義與苦智(知苦相實不生)、滅智(知諸法常寂滅如涅槃)、道智(知一切法常清淨無正無邪)並列,四諦各有一智,合為見諦道中之無漏觀慧。

就立名之由而言,論中設問:五受眾亦無常、亦苦、亦空、亦無我,何以但說苦智而不說無常智、空智、無我智?答曰:「為苦諦故說苦智,集諦故說集智,滅諦故說滅智,道諦故說道智。」 集智之立名,直接繫屬於集諦,非泛觀因緣生滅之智,而是專就集諦所觀之境而安立。論又指出,佛以眾生多著樂畏苦,故偏呵世間皆苦以令捨離;無常、空、無我中眾生不大畏,故不別立諦名。 此說明集智所觀之集諦,其施設意趣在於對治眾生對樂之貪著。

就攝屬關係而言,「集智攝集智及法智、比智、盡智、無生智少分」,即集智之體性兼攝法智、比智、盡智、無生智中與集諦相關之少分。反觀其所緣,「苦智、集智緣世智及有漏他心智」,集智所緣之境為世智與有漏他心智,此與滅智之「不緣智」、道智之「緣九智除世智」形成對照。

就三昧相應而言,集智與「無作三昧相應」,而與空三昧、無相三昧不相應。此顯示集智之觀照側重於無作(無願)門,即觀諸法無有和合、無所造作,而非偏於空性或寂滅無相。

就觀相而言,「苦、集、滅、道各各四相」,集智具四行相,與苦智、滅智、道智同。此四相即集諦下之因、集、生、緣四行相,論中以「各各四相」總括而未逐一分列。

就有漏無漏之判而言,集智「或有漏或無漏:若在煖法、頂法、忍法、世間第一法,是有漏;若入見諦道,是無漏」。論明言「集智、滅智、道智亦如是」,即四諦智於四善根位中為有漏,入見道方轉無漏。

就修道次第之生起而言,論述十六心中智之漸增:「初入無漏心成就一世智,第二心增苦智、法智,第四心增比智,第六心增集智,第十心增滅智,第十四心增道智。」 集智於第六心方得增上,居苦智、法智、比智之後,滅智、道智之前,此即見道十六心中觀集諦之位次。又「第六心中現在、未來修二智」,明集智現前時所修之智數。

就九智相應根而言,集智屬九智所攝,「八根相應,除慧根、憂根、苦根」。

論末總歸:十智各有其相、其緣、其別異觀法,而「如實智」無相無緣無別,滅諸觀法,十智入如實智中「失本名字,唯有一實智;譬如十方諸流水皆入大海,捨本名字,但名大海」。集智作為十智之一,亦歸入此一如實智中。然十智為阿羅漢、辟支佛、菩薩共有,如實智唯獨佛有,以「獨佛有不誑法」故。

用詞方面,本論以「五受眾」稱五蘊(「用苦慧呵五受眾」),此為鳩摩羅什譯本之慣用語,與他經「五陰」「五蘊」之譯名有別,歸一時當注意。又本論稱「無作三昧」,即他處所稱「無願三昧」之異名。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》論集智,置於十智體系之中,為法智、類智依所緣境差別而開出的四智之一。論曰:「法智、類智由境差別分為苦、集、滅、道四智。」集智即緣集諦境而生之智,與苦智、滅智、道智並列,同屬法智、類智之再分。

本論立集智之獨特理據,在於「行相」而非「境體」。七緣立十智中,第三緣明言:「行相故立苦集智,此二智境體無別故。」此謂苦智與集智所緣之境體本無差別——同緣有頂蘊——唯以行相不同而分立二智。此與滅智、道智之立為第四緣「行相境故立滅道智,此二行相境俱有別故」形成對照:滅、道二智行相與所緣境皆有別,故合為一緣說明;苦、集二智則僅行相有別而境體無別,故另立一緣。集智之獨立地位,正建立在「同境異行相」這一判準之上。

就所緣行相而言,論云盡智、無生智「此二初生唯苦、集類,以緣苦、集六種行相觀有頂蘊為境界故」。集智所攝行相為緣苦、集之六種行相,所觀境界為有頂蘊。金剛喻定之緣境亦與此相關:「緣苦、集因,緣滅、道異」——金剛喻定緣苦、集為因,與盡智、無生智初生時同其境類;緣滅、道則有異。集智在此脈絡中,與苦智同為無學聖者初起盡智、無生智時所攝之類。

於諸智互相緣之頌中,論以「諸智互相緣,法類道各九,苦集智各二,四皆十滅非」明其分齊。集智互相緣之對象唯二,遠少於法智、類智、道智之各九,亦少於世俗智之十。此「各二」正與前述「境體無別」相應:集智所緣既與苦智同體,其互緣之範圍遂狹,唯取二境。

術語形式上,本論逕稱「集智」,與「苦智」「滅智」「道智」對舉,不另立異名。其上位概念為「法智」「類智」,所屬體系為十智(世俗智、法智、類智、苦智、集智、滅智、道智、他心智、盡智、無生智)。論中又以「苦、集類」一語兼稱苦智與集智所攝之種類,表示二者在無學智初生時同為一類。

Related