Dharma · AI Companion

有為相

saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa

生住异灭等有为法的相状。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

有部实立生住异灭四相(初立第一重);唯识读为依他分位假法、中观三是偈读为假名安立,属名言假有之正面重立(究竟第三重);中观遮破四相自性依PP3不升。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

To understand *Sāṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* (有為相, the Characteristics of Conditioned Phenomena), we must first understand what *Saṃskṛta-dharma* (有為法, Conditioned Phenomena) means in Buddhist thought. "Conditioned" (*saṃskṛta*) refers to anything that arises, exists, and vanishes through the aggregation of causes and conditions (*hetu-pratyaya*). It encompasses everything in the empirical world—from physical matter and cosmic bodies to emotional fluctuations, subtle mental impulses, algorithms, relationships, and human bodily existence.

*Sāṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* (有為相) refers to the distinct, universal structural characteristics that signify an entity is governed by cause and effect within the stream of time. In the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (《大寶積經》), these characteristics are distilled into three fundamental stages: Arising (*jāti* / 生), Abiding/Decay (*sthiti-jarā* / 住-老), and Destruction (*nirodha/maraṇa* / 壞滅-死). These three marks are not arbitrary philosophical tags; they are the concrete dynamic signature of impermanence (*anitya* / 無常).

Classical canonical definitions lay down these three stages with absolute precision:

1. **Arising (*Jāti* / 生)** Classical definition: *“The initial arising, equal arising, manifestation, the appearance of aggregates (*skandhas* / 諸蘊), and the acquisition of sense-fields (*āyatanas* / 諸處) assembling in a shared biological/realm affinity (*nikāya-sabhāga* / 眾同分).”* *Meaning:* Arising is not merely a single point in time or a vague sense of "birth." It is the structural moment when causal factors converge, bringing forth the five aggregates (form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) and the six sense spheres (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind), allowing an entity or experience to cohere into a distinct class of existence.

2. **Abiding and Decay (*Sthiti-Jarā* / 住-老)** Classical definition: *“Clouding of consciousness, graying hair and falling locks, sagging skin and wrinkled face, reduction of lifespan, decay and maturation of sense faculties, and the aging/rotting of conditioned factors (*saṃskāra* / 諸行).”* *Meaning:* "Abiding" in Buddhism is never a static, frozen state. What we experience as "continuing to exist" is actually continuous, micro-level mutation and disintegration (*jarā* / 老 / 異相). From the moment something arises, its internal functionality and physical structure undergo inevitable decay and wear.

3. **Destruction (*Nirodha-Maraṇa* / 壞滅-死)** Classical definition: *“Dissolution into another state, cessation and collapse, scattering and breakdown of aggregates (*skandhas* / 諸蘊), abandonment upon the earth, and relinquishing of shared realm affinity (*nikāya-sabhāga* / 眾同分).”* *Meaning:* The final termination of a conditioned state. It is not an arbitrary annihilation from nowhere, but the inevitable unraveling where the supporting conditions scatter, forcing the constituent elements to disaggregate.

**Position in the Path of Liberation (*Vimukti-mārga* / 解脫道)**

Why does the Buddha emphasize observing these three marks?

- **Breaking the Illusion of Permanence (*Saṃjñā-viparyāsa* / 常想):** Sentient beings suffer primarily because they superlocate permanence, stability, and control onto conditioned phenomena—hoping a relationship, a body, a career, or a state of mind will remain unchanging. Revealing *saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* systematically exposes the structural instability inherent in all conditioned things. - **Delineating the Conditioned from the Unconditioned (*Asaṃskṛta* / 無為):** The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* contrasts the conditioned world with the *Tathāgatakāya* (如來身, the Buddha’s Dharma-body / Unconditioned Reality), declaring: *“The body of the Tathāgata is unconditioned, far removed from all conditioned characteristics. Why? Because the body of the Tathāgata cannot be sought through arising, cannot be sought through abiding, cannot be sought through destruction.”* Recognizing the marks of the conditioned allows practitioners to stop searching for unshakeable peace within conditioned items. - **Entering the *Saṃskṛta-samādhi* (有為三昧) / Ultimate Truth (*Paramārtha-satya* / 勝義諦):** Crucially, the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* takes a profound step beyond mere pessimistic observation. It states that at the level of ultimate reality (*dharmatā* / 法性), conditioned phenomena are *“not fabricated, nor unmeasurable... all conditioned factors have no real accumulation; all are intrinsically tranquil.”* When a practitioner observes conditioned marks without clinging or aversion, penetrating their dependent nature, they see that their ultimate nature is inherently empty and peaceful. This realization is known as the "Samādhi of the Conditioned" (*Saṃskṛta-samādhi* / 有為三昧).


Walkthrough in Daily Life

To see how *saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* operates, let us run through three contemporary scenarios and track the exact sequence of Arising (生), Abiding/Decay (住/老), and Destruction (壞滅/死) according to classical canonical parameters.

Scenario 1: Building a Tech Startup / Career Project

- Arising (生): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Appearance of aggregates and acquisition of sense-fields assembling in shared affinity." - *Daily experience:* An idea strikes during a meeting. Capital, engineers, servers, and business models aggregate (*skandhas* forming). The venture registers an LLC, hires a team, and acquires a workplace (*nikāya-sabhāga*—entering a specific industry cohort). This is the excitement of "Birth." - Abiding / Decay (住/老): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Maturation and decay of sense faculties, aging/rotting of conditioned factors." - *Daily experience:* The product launches. People think the company is in a stable "Abiding" stage. But in reality, technical debt accumulates, server hardware degrades, market trends shift, key staff experience burnout, and feature bloat sets in. What seems like operational stability is actually continuous, subtle decay (*jarā*). - Destruction (壞滅/死): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Scattering of aggregates, abandonment on earth, relinquishing shared affinity." - *Daily experience:* Funding runs out or technological displacement occurs. The team liquidates assets, server clusters are shut down, employees scatter to other companies, and the entity is deregistered. The enterprise "dies."

Scenario 2: Scrolling Social Media & Anxious Emotional Waves

- Arising (生): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Initial arising, equal arising, manifestation." - *Daily experience:* You open an app and see a peer’s post about a massive promotion. Instantly, sight (*rūpa*) meets eye consciousness (*cakṣur-vijñāna*), triggering mental formations (*saṃskāra* / 行蘊) of envy and a spike of anxiety (*vedanā* / 受蘊). A complete micro-world of distress arises. - Abiding / Decay (住/老): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Reduction of vitality, decaying of conditioned factors." - *Daily experience:* You try to sustain or suppress the emotion by obsessively refreshing the page. Yet the peak intensity of anxiety cannot maintain its original form; it dilutes into dull fatigue, cognitive fog, and physical muscle tension. The original sharp emotional state is aging and decaying second by second. - Destruction (壞滅/死): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Dissolution, scattering of aggregates." - *Daily experience:* A urgent phone call rings, or physical tiredness forces you to set the phone down. The emotional cluster scatters completely. The anxiety disappears back into silence.

Scenario 3: Intimate Relationships & Romantic Bond

- Arising (生): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Assembling of shared affinity (*nikāya-sabhāga*)." - *Daily experience:* Two individuals meet, share mutual attraction, projection, and shared goals, forming a household unit. - Abiding / Decay (住/老): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Clouding of perception, aging of conditioned factors." - *Daily experience:* The initial honeymoon excitement transitions into routine. Subtle communication frictions appear, physical aging occurs, emotional habits become predictable, and romantic idealizations dissolve. - Destruction (壞滅/死): - *Classical canonical mapping:* "Abandonment, relinquishing shared affinity." - *Daily experience:* Either through breakup, divorce, or physical death, the shared life structure dissolves into separate trajectories.

Where Modern People Commonly Misapply These Concepts:

1. Narrowing "Birth/Arising" to Biological Delivery: People think "Arising" only means biological birth. In Buddhist logic, every single thought, app session, project, and emotional wave goes through "Arising." 2. Mistaking "Abiding" for Static Permanence: People assume that during the "middle phase" of life, a career, or a marriage, things are fixed and secure. Classical Buddhism points out that "Abiding" is nothing but continuous micro-aging (*jarā*). 3. Viewing "Destruction" as an Unfair Interruption: When a project fails or a relationship ends, people treat it as an accidental tragedy. Understanding *saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* reveals that "Destruction" was built into the initial instant of "Arising."


Why Contemporary People Need It

In contemporary life, we are immersed in hyper-accelerated feedback loops—algorithmic feeds, economic volatility, AI evolution, and rapid social change. The cycle of Arising, Abiding/Decay, and Destruction has been compressed from decades into days, hours, or seconds.

**1. Relieving Modern "Permanence Anxiety" (*Saṃjñā-viparyāsa*)**

Contemporary culture subtly promises permanent security: "If you buy this subscription, achieve this net worth, or optimize your health, you will attain permanent control." When things naturally degrade (a codebase becomes obsolete, bodily energy drops, market trends shift), people experience intense self-blame and existential dread. *Sāṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* reminds us that decay and dissolution are structural laws of conditioned systems, not personal failures.

2. Interface with Cognitive Science and Algorithmic Life

Neuroscience and modern complex systems theory observe that brain states, cognitive focus, and biological cells are non-static dynamical systems—constantly forming, decaying, and re-assembling. Algorithmic feeds deliberately exploit human mind-states by generating rapid micro-cycles of Arising (dopamine hit), Decay (habituation), and Destruction (boredom), driving addictive scrolling. *Insight & Limitation:* While modern cognitive science describes *how* mental states arise and decay neurochemically, it often treats consciousness purely as a material byproduct to be re-engineered. Buddhist wisdom uses the observation of *saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* not just to optimize mental function, but to dismantle clinging at its root and liberate consciousness from conditioned suffering altogether.

**3. Reclaiming Inner Stability through *Saṃskṛta-samādhi***

When you recognize that every crisis, emotion, or structural shift is a conditioned phenomenon displaying its natural marks of Arising, Abiding/Decay, and Destruction, you stop trying to cling to what is passing. You step back into the witness position—seeing that behind the constantly changing storm of conditioned marks lies an intrinsically tranquil, non-fabricated nature (*dharmatā*).


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading 1: "Does observing Arising, Abiding, and Destruction mean Buddhism is pessimistic or nihilistic?"

- Clarification: No. Describing the mechanics of a burning building is not pessimism; it is situational awareness. Buddhism observes *saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa* so that individuals stop seeking permanent absolute happiness in impermanent, conditioned structures. Furthermore, as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* emphasizes, when observed deeply, conditioned phenomena are seen to be *“intrinsically quiescent”* (*一切皆寂靜*). This leads directly to peace and liberation, not despair.

**Misreading 2: "Is Unconditioned Reality (*Asaṃskṛta*) a secret place hidden outside the universe?"**

- Clarification: Unconditioned Reality (or the Tathāgata’s ultimate nature) is not a physical alternative dimension. It refers to the true nature (*dharmatā*) of all things when clinging, ignorance, and conceptual projections cease. As the sutra explains through the "Samādhi of the Conditioned," when one directly beholds conditioned phenomena as empty of intrinsic independent selfhood, the true, unconditioned reality is realized right there within the very nature of conditioned things.

Misreading 3: "Are 3 Marks (生、住、壞滅) and 4 Marks (生、住、異、滅) contradictory?"

- Clarification: Different canonical treatises (*Abhidharma*) and translation traditions emphasize slightly different numerical groupings. The 4 marks enumerate Arising (*jāti*), Abiding (*sthiti*), Mutation/Decay (*jarā/aniyatā*), and Destruction (*nirodha*). The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* condenses these into 3 marks: Arising (*jāti*), Abiding (*sthiti*—which inherently includes physical/mental decay and aging), and Destruction/Death (*nirodha/maraṇa*). Both models describe the exact same continuum of temporal flux; there is no fundamental contradiction in doctrine.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「有为相」(saṃskṛta-lakṣaṇa)是佛教中用以表征一切因缘造作之法(即有为法)在时间流变中所展现的生灭、变异与消亡特征的相状。在《大宝积经》中,有为相主要被概括为「生」、「住」与「坏灭」三种基本特征。一切世间因缘所生之法,皆不可避免地经历从无到有(生)、暂时维持(住)以及衰退消亡(坏灭)的过程。经文指出,有为相是「一切行无常」这一根本法印的具体体现。通过对有为相的深入观察,众生得以了知有为法的生灭无常本质,从而断除对世间万法的「常想」,进而追求超越有为相的无为境界。

二、主要阐述

《大宝积经》从多个维度对有为相及有为法的特征进行了深入的阐释,主要包括如来无为身对有为相的超越、十二因缘中生老死的具体相状,以及有为法的真实自性与观照方式。

1. 如来无为身对有为相的超越

经典首先通过对比「无为」与「有为相」来彰显如来身的超越性。经中明确指出,如来身即是无为,完全远离了一切诸有为相。具体而言,如来身是「不可以生求、不可以住求、不可以坏灭求」的。这里的「生」、「住」、「坏灭」正是因缘有为法所不可避免的相状。如来身作为无为法,不具备这些生灭变异的特征,因此不能在生、住、坏灭的有为相中去寻求或定义如来。这一论述确立了无为法与有为相之间的本质区别。

2. 十二因缘中「生」与「老死」的具体相状

在论述十二因缘的流转时,经文对有为相中的「生」与「老死」(即异相与灭相的具体表现)进行了极为详尽的定义,将抽象的有为相具象化为众生身心变化的实际过程: - 「生」的相状:定义为「是生、等生、趣、起,诸蕴出现,及得诸处会众同分」。这说明「生」不仅是生命的最初兴起,更是五蕴(诸蕴)的显现、六处(诸处)的获得以及在特定众生界(众同分)中的聚集。 - 「老」的相状(即有为相中「住」之变异,或称异相):定义为「情识惛耄、头白发落、皮缓面皱、寿命损减、诸根衰熟,诸行朽故」。这一描绘极其生动地展现了有为法在时间推移中,其生理与心理机能逐渐衰退、朽坏的变异过程。 - 「死」的相状(即有为相中的「坏灭」或灭相):定义为「丧灭转世、休废堕落、诸蕴散坏、委弃于地,舍众同分」。这表明「死」是有为法流转的终结阶段,表现为五蕴的消散、生命的委弃以及对原有众同分的舍弃。

3. 有为法的真实自性与观照方式

尽管有为法在现象上表现出强烈的生、老、死等有为相,但经文进一步揭示了有为法在实相上的真实本性。经中指出,一切有为法在本质上「非是所造作,亦无可称量」,且「诸行」的自性「无有积集,一切皆寂静」。这种不被外在生灭相所惑,直接洞察有为法本自寂静、非造作性的观照,在经中被称为「有为三昧」。同时,世尊作为觉者,能够如实了知一切有为法的真实相,即「于诸有为法,如性真实见,世尊皆悉知,诸法真实相」。这说明有为相虽然在世俗层面表现为生灭无常,但在胜义层面,其如性真实却是寂静无造作的。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大宝积经》(唐菩提流志译)中,对于有为相及相关概念的术语使用具有独特的译经风格,与其他部派或译本存在明显的表述差异: 1. 蕴的表述:本经在论述有为相的生灭时,统一使用了「诸蕴」这一术语,如「诸蕴出现」、「诸蕴散坏」,而非其他早期译本中常见的「五阴」或「五众」。 2. 处的表述:在描述生命生起时,本经采用了「诸处」或「六处」的表述,如「及得诸处会众同分」,这与其他译本中使用的「六入」或「六入处」有所不同。 3. 有为相特征的表述:在论述有为相的具体特征时,本经采用了「生」、「住」、「坏灭」的三相表述形式,指出如来身「不可以生求、不可以住求、不可以坏灭求」。这与部分经论中主张的「生、住、异、灭」四相,或「生、老、病、死」的四相表述在遣词用字上存在细微的侧重差异,本经更强调「坏灭」作为有为法终极消亡的特征。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「无为」的关系:有为相是有为法特有的标志,而无为法则完全超越了这些相状。如来身即是无为的具体体现,因此远离一切诸有为相,不可用生、住、坏灭等有为相去寻求。 2. 与「无常」的关系:有为相是无常规律的具体显现。在四种邬柁南(法印)中,「一切行无常」是有为法的核心属性。有为相的生、住、坏灭过程,正是无常规律在时间维度上的展开。如来宣说此法,旨在引导众生认识到有为法的无常性,从而断除「常想」。 3. 与「诸行」及「十二因缘」的关系:有为相是「诸行」在因缘流转中的动态表现。在十二因缘中,「生」与「老死」作为有为相的具体化,展示了诸蕴从「出现」到「散坏」的完整过程。然而,若能成就「有为三昧」,了知诸行自性「无有积集,一切皆寂静」,则能于有为法中见到真实相。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 「如来身者即是无为,远离一切诸有为相。何以故?如来之身,不可以生求、不可以住求、不可以坏灭求。」 2. 「云何为生?所谓是生、等生、趣、起,诸蕴出现,及得诸处会众同分,是名为生。」 3. 「云何为老?所谓情识惛耄、头白发落、皮缓面皱、寿命损减、诸根衰熟,诸行朽故,是名为老。」 4. 「云何为死?所谓丧灭转世、休废堕落、诸蕴散坏、委弃于地,舍众同分,是名为死。」 5. 「非是所造作,亦无可称量……诸行无有积集,一切皆寂静,是名有为三昧。」 6. 「于诸有为法,如性真实见,世尊皆悉知,诸法真实相。」 7. 「一切行无常……为欲令其断常想故。」

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

此部《大寶積經》論「有為相」,並非泛論有為法之生滅流轉,而是從「如來身」不可思議之面向加以闡明。其核心表述為:「如來身者即是無為,遠離一切諸有為相」,直接以「無為」對揚「有為相」,點出如來法身本性迥離生滅變異之相。就術語形式而言,本經採用「有為相」一詞總攝生住異滅等有為法的相狀,並未另立異名。值得留意的是,行文中對有為相之具體內容,常以「不可以生求、不可以住求、不可以壞滅求」三句呈現,此處用「壞滅」而非一般常見的「異滅」,作為有為相之指陳,是本經術語上的一個特色。經文以層層遮遣之筆法,顯揚如來身遠離有為相之理。如來身「不可以前際求、不可以後際求、不可以現在求」,「不可以色求、不可以相求、不可以好求」,「不可以心求、不可以意求、不可以識求」,乃至「不可以蘊求、不可以界求、不可以處求」、「不可以取求、不可以捨求、不可以出離求、不可以行求」、「不可以顯色求、不可以相貌求、不可以形色求、不可以來求、不可以去求」。凡有為法所依之時空、根境、心識、蘊界處、取捨行來等,皆一一遮破,顯示有為相不可執取、不可施設於如來法身。此否定之論述方式,並非正面定義「有為相」之內容,而是以「如來身」為觀照點,從「離」與「非」之角度,論證如來法身之體性:非生非住非壞滅、非色非相非好、非心意識、非蘊界處、非取捨行,藉此凸顯其「即是無為」之德性,而「諸有為相」即為其所超越、遠離之對象。此外,本經尚以種種功德與譬喻烘托如來法身,如「如來身者如淨鏡中微妙之像,如淨水中明滿之月,又如光影之所照耀」、「清淨無染,遠離一切諸染穢濁」、「等虛空界極法界性」、「無量功德,久已積集福智資糧」等,皆為「遠離諸有為相」之具體襯托,顯示如來法身不可度量、不可思議之德用。總觀此段經文,本經以「如來身即是無為,遠離一切諸有為相」一句為樞紐,配合「不可以生、住、壞滅求」之遮破,以及時空、色相、心識、蘊界處、取捨行等多層否定,闡明有為相於如來法身畢竟不可得。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以「有為相」一詞專指生、住、異、滅四種相狀,乃有為法之判別之相。開篇頌文明標:「相謂諸有為,生住異滅性。」 隨後廣釋四相之別:生為「能起名生」,住為「能安名住」,異為「能衰名異」,滅為「能壞名滅」,以此四性為體,能令諸行於三世遷流,令有情生厭畏。

針對經中或說三相、或說四相之異,本論以「住異合說」消通:住為有情所愛著處,故與異合說,令其厭捨,如示黑耳與吉祥俱;又因無為法亦有自相之住,若別立住相則與無為濫,故經不說。本論並設「稠林三怨敵」之喻:一生將行牽出未來,一衰其力令入現在,一壞命根令入過去;住則攝受安立,常不相離,故不入有為相中。

針對「生等既是諸有為,應更有生等相」之無窮過難,本論立本相、隨相二層以遮:四本相(生住異滅)一一於八法有用,四隨相(生生、住住、異異、滅滅)一一於一法有用,如雌雞生多子、唯生一者之喻。功能差別故,不墮無窮。

本論對「生等實有」與「唯假建立」兩家之諍有詳明評述。經部師以生等相無實體,如色等無定量可證;契經所說「有為之起亦可了知,盡及住異亦可了知」,乃就相續體之有為、緣生性而說,非一剎那中具有三相。本論責彼「執文迷義」,以白鷺表水、童女表善惡為喻,釋經中重說「有為」之言,顯此相為表有為之能,令知諸行相續初起名生、終盡名滅、中間隨轉名住、前後別名住異。對法(毘曇)一系依《發智論》眾同分相續心說,認住於剎那法無別體,唯就前後相續相似說住,前後差別說異,如金剛等有擲未擲、速遲墮落之別。

本論復辯「能相非離所相」之難,以角蹄尾為牛相而不異於牛、堅等為地相而不異於地為喻,設若生等離色等別有實物,則一法一時應即生住異滅俱有;以「用時別故」通之:生用於未來,住等三用於現在已生之時,故不相違。又引餘部「滅因緣方滅所滅」之說,以服瀉藥天來令利之喻破之,明心心所剎那滅不待餘緣。末段以「非恐有鹿而不種麥,懼多蠅附不食美團」之譬,勸學者當順本宗義,不以設難而棄宗;總結生等唯假建立,無別實物,本無今有假立為生,第六轉言「色之生」等乃為簡別所餘法而說。

整體而言,本論術語形式含「能起、能安、能衰、能壞」「相續、剎那」「本相、隨相」「第六轉言」等,獨特以稠林怨敵、雌雞生卵、角蹄牛相、服瀉藥、美團蠅附等譬組織論述,並以住異合說消經部三相之說。

中論T1564 · 中觀部

《中論》以「三相」——生、住、滅——來論述有為法的相狀。值得注意的是,此處本論所用為「三相」之說(生、住、滅),而非常見之「生住異滅」四相之表述。

核心論述分為數層:

一、《中論》首先破斥「經說有為法有三相:生、住、滅」之說,指出若三相本身是有為,則其亦應具三相;若三相是無為,則不能為有為法作相。兩者皆不然,故三相無有決定之性。

二、就「生」相單獨而言:若生是有為,則生相應生法、住相應住法、滅相應滅法,三相相違,不能於一時並存,如明闇之不俱。是故生不應是有為法,住、滅亦然。若生是無為,則無為法無自性,唯有「不生不滅」之相,更無自相,故無法為有為法作相,如兔角、龜毛不能為法作相。住、滅亦如是。

三、就三相之關係而言:若三相各各別能作有為之相,則生時無住、滅,住時無生、滅,滅時無生、住;若三相和合能作相,然相違之法不能一時俱有。二俱不然。

四、《中論》以偈頌總結:「若謂生住滅,更有有為相,是即為無窮,無即非有為。」若三相更各有有為相,則展轉相生,無窮無盡;若三相更無別相,則不名有為,亦不能為有為法作相。

綜上,《中論》層層遮遣,從三相自身之有為無為、三相個別與和合、三相是否更各有相三個角度,破斥有為三相之實有,從而顯示有為相之不可得。

Related