Dharma · AI Companion

五色根

pañcarūpīndriya

眼耳鼻舌身五种物质性根门。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

五色根为色法,可正面读至缘生无自性;『色即是空』属五蕴总相读法,PP1 不下放为根门 究竟层

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What this concept is about

In the Buddhist path of liberation, the 五色根 (pañcarūpīndriya, the five material sense faculties) — the eye faculty, ear faculty, nose faculty, tongue faculty, and body faculty — refer to five kinds of material (rūpa-dharma, material phenomena) sense organs and perceptual potentials.

Many beginners tend to equate the "five material sense faculties" simply with the physically visible "eyeballs, ears, nose, tongue, and skin." But in the fine-grained analysis of the 阿毗達磨 (Abhidharma) and later śāstras, the classical system makes a very clear distinction within the five material sense faculties:

1. 扶塵根(浮塵根)(the "supporting" sense bases): the externally visible physiological structures (such as the eyeball, auricle, tongue, etc.), which are merely the "containers" or "supporting apparatuses" produced by the four great elements (四大, mahābhūta). 2. 勝義根(淨色根)(the ultimate sense faculty / pure-material sense faculty): This is the true core of the "five material sense faculties." It is an extremely subtle, pure materiality produced by the four great elements ("四大所造淨色," pure matter produced by the four great elements). It is deeply hidden within the organs, like a transparent perceptual neural network — invisible to the naked eye, yet possessing the powerful augmenting capacity to "generate consciousness" (發識, *vijñāna-utpāda*). A blind person may have intact eyeballs (the supporting base), but if the optic nerve or deeper perceptual capacity (the pure-material base) is damaged, eye-consciousness cannot arise.

In the entire causal chain of the path of liberation, the five material sense faculties play the role of "the pivotal hub through which causes and conditions (因緣, hetu-pratyaya) generate consciousness and through which cultivation proceeds":

* The coming together of three dharmas and the arising of contact and feeling: Consciousness does not arise out of nowhere without causes. The *Saṃyuktāgama* (《雜阿含經》) points out that the five material sense faculties must serve as the internal support for contacting the external "five sense objects" (五境: form, sound, smell, taste, touch). Only when the faculty and the object collide can the "five consciousnesses" (五識: eye-, ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-consciousness) arise through causes and conditions. When the three — sense faculty (根, indriya), sense object (境, viṣaya), and consciousness (識, vijñāna) — come together, "contact" (觸, sparśa) is produced; with contact as the proximate condition, "feeling" (受, vedanā: the inner experience of pain, pleasure, or neither), "perception" (想, saṃjñā: apprehending marks and discriminating), and "volition" (思, cetanā: volitional tendency) immediately arise. * The simile of hands and feet: The scriptures use a highly vivid simile to clarify the decisive role of the sense faculties: just as a person can grasp and release only because of hands, and can come and go only because of feet; likewise, precisely because the five material sense faculties such as the eye exist, the conditions of eye-contact and so forth can give rise to inner feelings of pain and pleasure. Without the five material sense faculties, human perception and emotional experience would lose their material grounding entirely.

Its position in the path of liberation is extremely critical: the five material sense faculties are the gateway through which this sentient life (名色, nāma-rūpa, name-and-form) connects to the physical world, and they are the "first scene" where all craving, aversion, and clinging erupt.


A walkthrough in daily life

To keep the concept from becoming an abstract abstraction, we can walk through the complete operational process from the "five material sense faculties" to the "arising of suffering and pleasure" along the most familiar contemporary daily scenario — scrolling through one's phone late at night:

1. Scene mapping: from faculty-object collision to feeling, perception, and volition

* Eye-form collision (eye faculty): Late at night, your eye's pure material (眼淨色, the eye faculty) receives the blue light and pixel imagery emitted by the screen (form object), instantly facilitating the arising of eye-consciousness (眼識). * Ear-sound collision (ear faculty): From the earphones, a short video's catchy soundtrack (sound object) strikes the ear faculty, giving rise to ear-consciousness (耳識). * Body-touch collision (body faculty): Your finger slides across the cold glass screen, and the soreness in your back slumped on the sofa (touch object) gives rise to body-consciousness (身識) through the body faculty. * The coming together of three things produces "contact": At this point, your faculty, object, and consciousness are tightly combined, producing eye-contact, ear-contact, and body-contact. * "Feeling, perception, and volition" follow immediately: * 受 (vedanā, feeling): Seeing a provocative news item or a funny video, a small burst of pleasure arises in your mind (pleasant feeling); scrolling to a post that triggers anxiety, irritation arises in an instant (painful feeling). * 想 (saṃjñā, perception): You recognize "this is an influencer I follow," "this is such-and-such a social event" (apprehending marks and discriminating). * 思 (cetanā, volition): Volition begins to construct — "I want to like this," "I want to argue with someone in the comments," "I want to keep scrolling" (volitional intention).

You see — in just one second of phone-scrolling, the five material sense faculties, as the pivotal hub, continuously transform physical-world stimuli into inner emotional waves (六受身、六想身、六思身, the six bodies of feeling, six bodies of perception, and six bodies of volition).

2. The most common mapping error: treating "cultivation" as "cutting off perception"

Many people, when attempting to cultivate or manage anxiety in real life, most easily fall into a misconception: thinking that "guarding the six sense faculties" (守護六根) means "closing the eyes, plugging the ears, and severing physical contact."

In the classical scriptures, the non-Buddhist 波羅奢那 (Parāśarya) also raised the same view, holding that "the eye not seeing forms, the ear not hearing sounds" constitutes sense-faculty cultivation. The Buddha and Ānanda immediately refuted this sharply: If "not seeing and not hearing" alone constituted sense-faculty cultivation, then wouldn't the blind and the deaf be born great adepts?

This misconception is extremely common in the contemporary world: some people, seeking tranquility, go to great lengths to avoid all social contact, turn off their phones, even shut themselves in absolutely quiet rooms — and once they return to the noisy, chaotic reality of daily life, their minds immediately collapse. This is not genuine "supreme sense-faculty cultivation."

3. The Buddhist definition of "supreme sense-faculty cultivation"

The "supreme sense-faculty cultivation in the noble ones' discipline" (賢聖法律中的無上修根) proposed by the Buddha is by no means physical isolation, but rather, at the very moment when the five material sense faculties contact the external world (agreeable, disagreeable, or half-and-half objects):

1. Clearly seeing that it "perishes in an instant": clearly seeing that the image seen by the eye faculty, the sound heard by the ear faculty, and the pleasure arising in the mind are all, by nature, extremely transient flash-thoughts that arise and perish moment by moment. 2. Generating an "equanimous" mind (舍心, upekṣā-citta), abiding in right mindfulness and right wisdom (正念正智): toward pleasant sounds, not sinking into attachment; toward disgusting images, not generating aversion; the mind swiftly returns to calm like "力士彈指" (the snap of a strong man's fingers), and, like "蓮花不染水" (a lotus unstained by water) or "唾沫盡唾" (spit spat upon spittle), does not cling or linger.


Why contemporary people need it

In an age where algorithms and information streams reshape life, we need to understand the "five material sense faculties" more than any previous era.

1. Modern technology's deep hijacking of the "five material sense faculties"

Contemporary algorithmic logic (such as recommendation systems, short videos, and game mechanics) is, in essence, a set of precisely designed biological bait targeting the human "five material sense faculties." * Extreme visual color (eye faculty), high-frequency sound stimulation (ear faculty), and precise haptic feedback (body faculty) relentlessly yank at your five material sense faculties. * Once faculty and object collide frequently, tiny "pleasant feelings" and "stimulation" are continuously manufactured. Many of today's mental anxieties and attention deficits fundamentally stem from our five material sense faculties being exposed without defense to large-scale industrialized stimulus sources, causing the "six bodies of feeling" (六受身) to be extremely overloaded.

2. From "passive reaction" to "interception at the hub"

If you do not understand the operational mechanism of the five material sense faculties, you will become a stimulus-response machine: The external world gives a stimulus (境, object), the five material sense faculties receive it (根, faculty), consciousness arises (識, consciousness), and we immediately fall into craving or anger (受/思, feeling/volition). We think we are living autonomously, but in fact we are merely passively responding to signals received by the five material sense faculties.

Once you understand that the five material sense faculties are "the pivotal hub through which causes and conditions generate consciousness," you have found the first scene for intercepting afflictions: * Afflictions do not arise out of thin air; they originate at the moment when "the three things — faculty, object, and consciousness — come together" (根境識三事和合). * When you are provoked by a message, if you can recognize: "This is merely my ear faculty / eye faculty receiving some sound wave and pixels; the three things coming together produce contact, which in turn triggers a painful feeling. This signal 'perishes in an instant.'" * This moment of mindfulness creates a precious mental buffer zone between the five material sense faculties and inner impulses.

3. Comparison and limitations vis-à-vis modern neuroscience and AI

In modern science, we often analogize the five material sense faculties to neurobiology (such as receptors, the retina, and cortical sensory areas), and analogize the "faculty-object-consciousness-contact-feeling" mechanism to AI's "sensor input — neural network feature extraction — output control."

This kind of analogy can help contemporary people understand that "perception is the product of the combination of a neural material basis and stimuli," but analogy is by no means identity: * The limitation of science: Modern neuroscience and AI architectures investigate how physical signals are converted into data and bioelectric impulses; they attempt to reduce perception to purely neuronal electrochemical reactions. However, brain science has so far been unable to fully explain how the "texture of subjective experience (Qualia)" emerges from physical matter (i.e., the subtle mutual-dependent relationship between the subtle "consciousness" (識) and "name-and-form" (名色) as discussed in the 唯識 (Yogācāra) and 阿含 (Āgama) schools). * Buddhism's ultimate concern: Science's study of sense organs stops at "mechanism analysis" and "technical repair" (such as building artificial retinas); Buddhism's analysis of the "five material sense faculties," by contrast, ultimately rests on the path of liberation — revealing the impermanence (anitya) of the five material sense faculties as conditioned dharmas (因緣法, *pratītyasamutpanna-dharma*, dharmas arising from causes and conditions). In the ultimate state of nirvāṇa without remainder (無餘涅槃, anupadhiśeṣa-nirvāṇa), the complete cessation of the five material sense faculties together with nāma-rūpa is the fundamental criterion for severing the cycle of birth-and-death and the extinction of all suffering and pleasure.


Common misconceptions and clarifications

Misconception 1: Narrowing the "material sense faculties" to the physically visible "flesh-and-blood organs"

* Clarification: In classical doctrine, the five material sense faculties refer to the subtle, pure "pure-material sense faculties" (淨色根/勝義根, the ultimate sense faculties), not the externally visible physiological organs (扶塵根, the supporting bases). A blind person's eyeballs may still be present (the supporting base is not damaged), but if the optic nerve or perceptual potential is damaged (the pure-material base is damaged), consciousness cannot arise. Crudely equating the five material sense faculties with the "bare eyes and ears" of modern anatomy narrows their deeper meaning as the subtle, pure materiality produced by the four great elements.

Misconception 2: Thinking cultivation means the physical isolation of "the eye not seeing, the ear not hearing"

* Clarification: As noted above, the Buddha explicitly refuted the non-Buddhist view that "not seeing and not hearing constitutes sense-faculty cultivation." True cultivation means that while the five material sense faculties receive stimuli as usual, the mind is not turned by those stimuli. Toward favorable states, one does not generate attachment; toward unfavorable states, one does not generate aversion; one abides in "the equanimous mind that has departed from both, with right mindfulness and right wisdom" (俱離舍心,正念正智).

Misconception 3: Misunderstanding the "cessation of the five material sense faculties" as "suicide or damaging one's organs"

* Clarification: The "unremaindered cessation of the five material sense faculties and nāma-rūpa" (五色根與名色無餘滅盡) mentioned in the scriptures means that, after one has severed all afflictions through wisdom and no longer creates the karma of birth-and-death, life no longer relies on karma to induce the next period of material and mental existence (nirvāṇa without remainder). This is the ultimate transcendence of the causal chain of the cycle of rebirth — absolutely not the destruction or damage of one's own physiological organs in a living body. Before attaining nirvāṇa, noble disciples continue to move through the world and teach sentient beings with the five material sense faculties, purified and well-tamed.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

【一、定义与核心要义】 五色根,即眼根、耳根、鼻根、舌根、身根,是佛教经典中用以指代五种物质性感觉器官的核心概念。在《雜阿含經》中,五色根常与属于心法领域的“意根”并列,合称为“六根”或“六入處”。作为有情众生与外界物理世界接触的媒介,五色根不仅是因缘生识、产生一切心理活动(如触、受、想、思)的物质基础,更是修行者防护、调伏以至证得“无上修根”的关键所在。在终极的解脱境界中,五色根与意根及名色的彻底灭尽,是斩断生死轮回、实现苦乐悉灭的根本标志。 【二、主要阐述】 1. 因缘生识与三法和合的机制:经典指出,任何心识的产生都不是孤立的,而是必须依凭特定的因缘。具体而言,眼、耳、鼻、舌、身这五色根,必须分别与色、声、香、味、触这五种外界境界相接触,才能因缘生起相应的眼识、耳识、鼻识、舌识、身识。当根、境、识这三者和合时,便产生了“触”;由触作为因缘,又相继引发了“受”(苦、乐、不苦不乐的内心体验)、“思”(意志意向)与“想”(表象认知)。这一过程在心理层面上具体表现为“六受身”、“六想身”与“六思身”的流转。为了生动地说明五色根在这一机制中的决定性作用,经典以身体器官作喻:正如人因为有手才能进行取舍,因为有足才能进行往来;同样地,正是因为有眼等五色根的存在,才会产生眼触等因缘,进而生起内心的苦、乐或不苦不乐之觉受。若没有眼等五色根,则相应的触与受便根本无从谈起。 2. 六根的调伏与“无上修根”:由于五色根是众生接触世间境界的门户,因此对它们的防护与修习直接关系到修行的成败。经典详细对比了调伏与不调伏的两种截然相反的后果:如果对眼等六根“不调伏、不关闭、不守护、不执持、不修习”,在面对外界色声香味触等境界时,就会执取其相貌与随形好,任由诸根随境流转,从而在内心生起世间的贪爱、忧悲等恶不善法,导致未来遭受无量苦报;相反,若能“善调伏、善关闭、善守护、善执持、善修习”,在眼见色、耳闻声时常住律仪、防护诸根,不取色相,就能防范恶法生起,未来必受乐报。在修根的路径上,经典特别反驳了外道波罗奢那的错误观点。外道认为“眼不见色,耳不听声”就是修根,佛陀与阿难对此予以严厉反驳,指出如果仅以“不见不闻”为修根,那么盲人和聋人就应当是修行成就者。佛陀随即提出了贤圣法律中的“无上修根”:真正的修根并非物理上的隔绝,而是在根、境、识三者缘生时,面对“可意、不可意、可意不可意”的各种境界,内心能够修习如来的“厌离、不厌离、俱离捨心住正念正智”。圣弟子在五色根接触境界时,能够如实了知这些境界是“俄爾盡滅”的,其本质是“寂滅、勝妙”的,从而在内心深处生起“捨”心,超越了对境界的厌恶与喜爱,其寂灭的速度就如同力士弹指、莲花不染水、唾沫尽唾般迅速。 3. 诸根与名色的灭尽:在阿含经典的终极解脱视野中,五色根并非需要永久保存的实体,而是需要在修行圆满时予以超越和灭尽的因缘法。多处偈颂明确指出,眼、耳、鼻、舌、身五色根以及第六意入处,与它们所依附或关联的“名及色”,如果能够得到“無餘滅盡”或“永滅盡無餘”,那么依根境而起的诸识就会永灭,生死轮回的道路便不再运转,一切苦乐体验也随之悉皆灭尽,从而达到彻底的无余涅槃。 【三、不同部类与译本的表述差异】 在《雜阿含經》的不同卷册与偈颂中,对于包含五色根在内的分类和称呼存在细微的表述差异。例如,在描述六种器官与境界的结合处时,有的经文表述为“眼耳鼻舌身,第六意入處”,而有的偈颂则表述为“眼耳及與鼻,舌身意入處”。此外,在论述诸根灭尽与解脱的关系时,不同偈颂对灭尽对象的表述也有所侧重:如有的偈颂强调“眼耳鼻舌身,意入處咸滅”及“名色”的无余灭尽;有的偈颂则表述为“眼耳及與鼻,舌身意入處,於此等諸法,永滅盡無餘”;另有偈颂侧重于“名色及與識,此等皆滅盡”或“名色無餘滅,彼亦無餘滅”的表述。这些不同的偈颂和译词反映了在不同传译或结集语境下对五色根及其关联法灭尽过程的多元呈现。 【四、与相关概念的关系】 1. 与“意根”及“六入处”的关系:五色根(眼、耳、鼻、舌、身)属于物质性的色法,而意根属于非物质性的心法。这五色根与意根共同构成了“六入处”或“六根”。五色根负责接收物理世界的色、声、香、味、触,而意根则作为第六入处,统摄和处理更为微细的法境。 2. 与“名色”及“识”的关系:五色根在物质层面上属于“色”的范畴。在因缘生法的链条中,五色根与名色、识相互依存。根境因缘生识,而识的持续存在又以名色(包含五色根)为缘。在终极解脱中,五色根等入处的灭尽与“名色”的无余灭尽是同步发生的,名色灭则识灭,识灭则生死道断。 【五、代表性原文引用】 1. 论因缘生识与手足之喻:“眼、色因緣生眼識,三事和合觸,觸俱生受、想、思。” “譬如士夫有手故知有取捨,有足故知有往來……如是,有眼故眼觸因緣生受,內覺若苦、若樂、不苦不樂。” 2. 论无上修根之境界:“唯有眼根、色、眼識,可意、不可意、可意不可意,俄爾盡滅,得捨,如是耳、鼻、舌、身、意根、法、意識,可意、不可意、可意不可意,俄爾盡滅,得捨。” 3. 论诸根与名色灭尽之偈颂:“眼耳鼻舌身,意入處咸滅,名色無餘滅,諸識亦隨滅。識滅生死不轉,苦樂悉皆滅。” “眼耳及與鼻,舌身意入處,於此等諸法,永滅盡無餘……名色無餘滅,彼亦無餘滅。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論及五色根時,固定以「眼耳鼻舌身」五字連舉作為起句,其後必接「意入處」而合為六項,構成完整的感知門戶序列。三首偈頌的術語形式略有差異:一作「第六意入處」,一作「及彼意入處」,一作「及以意入處」,但所指相同。值得注意的是,本經並未使用「五色根」這一複合名詞,而是以逐一根名(眼、耳、鼻、舌、身)直接列舉,並以「入處」(即處、āyatana)統攝第六意根,顯示本經在術語層面偏好「入處」框架而非「根」框架來安立感知機制的分類。

在義理結構上,三首偈頌呈現高度一致的論述模式:五色根與意入處並舉之後,立即接入「名色」之滅。chunk:6924 作「若彼名及色,得無餘滅盡」,chunk:7015 作「名色滅無餘」,chunk:18973 作「於彼名及色,永滅盡無餘」。「無餘」一詞三見,為本經論述此組概念時的核心限定語,強調滅盡的徹底性與無遺餘性,而非暫時伏抑或部分止息。五色根在此並非被單獨討論其物質構造或認識功能,而是被置於「名色—入處」的依存脈絡中:根門之轉起依於名色,名色滅則根門亦隨之寂止。

在解脫論的歸趣上,三首偈各有側重而互為補充。chunk:6924 以人物為結:「能知此諸法,解脫七比丘,貪有悉已盡,永超世恩愛」,將五色根等諸法的如實知見與具體修行者(七比丘)的解脫直接聯繫,落點在「貪有盡」與「超世恩愛」,屬煩惱滅盡的表述。chunk:7015 與 chunk:18973 則轉向水流隱喻:前者云「薩羅小還流,生死道不轉」,後者云「於彼泉轉還,於彼道不轉」。「薩羅小還流」與「泉轉還」應為同一意象的不同譯寫或傳本異文,皆以水流迴轉喻生死流轉之止息;「道不轉」則謂趣向輪迴之路不復運轉。兩偈最終同歸於「苦樂滅無餘」、「於彼苦及樂,得無餘滅盡」,將五色根等入處之滅的果效落實在苦樂感受的徹底止息上。

綜合而言,《雜阿含經》對五色根的論述具有以下特徵:其一,術語上以逐一根名連舉加「入處」統稱,不用「五色根」合名;其二,結構上必將五根與意入處、名色三者並觀,根門非獨立自存之實體;其三,歸趣上以「無餘滅盡」為一貫限定,指向貪盡、生死道斷、苦樂滅盡的解脫境。三首偈頌屬同一教說的不同傳誦,核心命題一致而修辭互異,正顯示口傳階段偈頌的平行複現特徵。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》論及五色根時,所用術語為「五情」而非「五根」或「五色根」。此為本論獨特之用詞,須於多譯名歸一中記錄。

一、以「五情」稱五色根。本論偈頌云「沈沒於五情」,又云「五情馬所制」,以五情喻如烈馬,能牽制比丘之心,令其雖已剃髮著袈裟、捨五欲樂,仍為感官欲樂所縛,「取笑於眾人」。此處「五情」即指眼、耳、鼻、舌、身五種物質性感官,與他經所稱「五根」「五色根」同義,而本論一律以「五情」稱之。

二、五情為對治欲樂之核心所觀境。本論偈頌以問答體層層推進:欲樂以何捨?「得諸禪定樂,則不為所欺」;欲樂以何滅?「若得不淨觀,此心自然無」;以何悟其心?「當觀老病死,爾乃出四淵」;何以遠之?「若能樂善法,此欲自然息」;何以釋之?「觀身得實相,則不為所縛」。最後總結「如是諸觀法,能滅諸欲火;譬如大澍雨,野火無在者」。五情所引之欲,須以禪定、不淨觀、老病死觀、善法樂、身實相觀等對治,此為本論從修行實踐面論五情之要旨。

三、五情列入色法五分分類。本論於廣分別色法時,列舉二種、三種、四種、五種色之分類。其中「五種色」一科云:「身作、無作色,口作、無作色,及非業色;五情、五塵;麁色、動色、影色、像色、誑色。」此處「五情」與「五塵」對舉,五情屬內色(能取之根),五塵屬外色(所取之境),同攝於色法之中。此為本論從阿毘達磨分析面將五情定位為色法之一類。

四、麁色即五情五塵所對之境。本論釋「麁色」云:「可見、可聞、可嗅、可味、可觸,如土石等。」可見、可聞、可嗅、可味、可觸,正對應眼、耳、鼻、舌、身五情所取之色、聲、香、味、觸五塵,顯示五情與五塵在認識結構中之對應關係。

綜上,《大智度論》以「五情」為五色根之專稱,一面從修行面警示五情如馬、能制比丘,須以諸觀法滅欲火;一面從色法分析面將五情列入五種色分類,與五塵對舉,攝於色法。兩面互補,前者重對治,後者重分別。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》論五色根,首先將其納入色蘊總綱:「色者唯五根,五境及無表」,謂色蘊全部內容唯此三類,五根居首。論釋隨即將五根列為「眼、耳、鼻、舌、身根」,並指出五境即「眼等五根境界」,根與境對舉而立。

本論界定五根體性的核心術語為「淨色」。頌云「彼識依淨色,名眼等五根」,論釋謂五識(色、聲、香、味、觸識)所依之五種淨色,如其次第即眼等五根。論中引佛說為證:「眼謂內處,四大所造淨色為性」,又引《品類足論》「眼識所依淨色為性」,兩說互順,以「識所依」與「四大所造淨色」二義共成根體。此處用詞值得注意:本論一律以「淨色」稱五根之體性,不說「色根」或「勝義根」等他名;「根」字本身取「所依止義」,即識依之而住、依之而生。

在取境時態上,論明言「眼等前五唯取現境」,與意根之通三世無為不同,此為五根區別於意根的重要側面。論又詳辨五根取境之遠近、遲速:眼耳取遠境,故先於鼻舌身;眼中又兼速義,「先遠見人撞擊鍾鼓後聞聲」;鼻舌俱非遠而鼻速,「鼻先嗅香、舌後甞味」;身多居下,意無方處。此段以「遠速明」三準則安立根之次第,為本論獨特之組織方式。

論中復以極微安布差別描述五根之物質形態:眼根極微「在眼星上傍布而住,如香荾花清澈映覆」;耳根極微「居耳穴內旋環而住,如卷樺皮」;鼻根極微「居鼻頞內背上面下,如雙爪甲」;舌根極微「布在舌上,形如半月」;身根極微「遍住身分,如身形量」。此五喻為本論對五根物質結構最具象的刻畫。論並指出五識「決定積集多微,方成所依所緣性」,非一極微能發識。

在功能論上,本論立五根各於四事為增上:「一莊嚴身、二導養身、三生識等、四不共事」。眼耳莊嚴身謂盲聾則身醜陋;導養身謂因見聞避險難;鼻舌身之導養則特指「於段食能受用」;不共事即各別嗅、甞、覺香味觸。

最後,論以「增上」義總釋何以立根:「眼等五根於能了別各別境識有增上用」,而境於識中無此勝自在力,故色聲等不立為根。論又明女男二根「體不離身根」,乃於身根一分中別立,因其於女男性中有增上用。此即以「增上」一義統攝根之建立,為本論貫穿根品之綱領。

Related