Dharma · AI Companion

了義經

nītārtha-sūtra

直接显示究竟义理的经典。AI-generated

Type GenreDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

〔判教镜头〕了义之判准诸宗不同:中观以显说毕竟空为了义,唯识以三性三无性为了义,天台以圆教为了义;此处并列不裁

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In Buddhist discourse, teachings are broadly categorized into two categories: Nītārtha Sūtras (了義經, *scriptures of definitive meaning*) and Neynārtha Sūtras (不了義經, *scriptures of provisional or explicit meaning*).

At its core, a Nītārtha Sūtra is defined as a scripture that directly reveals Paramārtha-satya (第一義諦 / 勝義諦, *ultimate truth*), Śūnyatā (空性, *emptiness*), Animitta (無相, *signlessness*), and the intrinsic non-arising and non-ceasing nature of all phenomena (諸法不生不滅) [11066]. Rather than relying on pedagogical metaphors or moral stepping stones, it points directly to the ultimate nature of reality, guiding practitioners straight toward final liberation (*nirvana*) [11066, 16115].

To understand the location of the Nītārtha Sūtra within the broader path of liberation (解脫道), one must look at the Four Reliances (四依) established for Bodhisattvas, one of which explicitly states: *"Rely on scriptures of definitive meaning, not on scriptures of provisional meaning"* (依了義經,不依不了義經) [11887, 13795].

The classical scriptures—such as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (《大寶積經》), the *Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra* (《大方等大集經》), and the *Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra* (translated as 《深密解脫經》)—delineate the boundaries between these two types of teachings across several key dimensions:

1. Level of Truth and Reality

* Neynārtha (Provisional): Operates at the level of Saṃvṛti-satya (世俗諦, *conventional truth*) [16115]. It accommodates conventional notions of selfhood, using terms such as "I" (我), "sentient being" (有情 / 眾生), "life span" (命者 / 壽命), "feeder" (養者 / 養育), "person" (士夫), "the one who transmigrates" (數取趣者 / 數取者, *pudgala*), or "agent and receiver" (作者受者) [13794, 16115, 16116]. * Nītārtha (Definitive): Operates strictly at the level of Paramārtha-satya (勝義諦, *ultimate truth*) [16115]. It reveals the emptiness of both self and phenomena, directly declaring that there is no solid "I," no distinct sentient being, and no inherent agent or receiver, opening instead the Three Gates of Liberation (三解脫門): Emptiness (空), Signlessness (無相), and Wishlessness (無願 / 無作) [13794, 16115].

2. View on Saṃsāra and Nirvāṇa

* Neynārtha (Provisional): Teaches a dualistic posture: repelling Saṃsāra due to its inherent suffering and hungering after Nirvāṇa as a distant sanctuary ("厌背生死,欣乐涅槃") [13794, 16115]. * Nītārtha (Definitive): Expounds the non-dual reality that *Saṃsāra* and *Nirvāṇa* are fundamentally undifferentiated ("生死涅槃二無差別" / "一相無二") [13794, 16115]. Because all phenomena are inherently calm and naturally in Nirvāṇa (諸法自性涅槃), there is no real bound state to escape from and no concrete Nirvāṇa to acquire [11066].

3. Guidance on Cultivation and Fruit

* Neynārtha (Provisional): Focuses on the "differentiated cultivation of the path" (分別修道) [13794]. It emphasizes the law of karma—that actions yield rewards or retribution—and focuses on condemning afflictions while praising virtuous deeds ("讚白淨法") [13794, 16115]. * Nītārtha (Definitive): Focuses directly on the direct cessation of all afflictions (盡諸煩惱) [13794]. It points straight to the ultimate "fruit" without getting bogged down in endless conceptual classifications of progress ("不分別果") [13794, 16115].

4. Expression and Mental Effect on the Listener

* Neynārtha (Provisional): Uses elaborate, beautifully ornate language (廣文 / 讚說種種莊嚴文字) and speaks extensively of karma, sin, and merit (罪福相) [13794, 16115]. While this delights the mind or instills healthy moral fear, it leaves the listener swinging between emotional poles—joy over merit and sorrow over sin ("心生欣戚") [13794]. * Neynārtha (Definitive): Features profound, subtle, and uncompromising teachings that are difficult to hold and comprehend (甚深經難持難了) [13794, 16115]. Its ultimate intent goes beyond literal text—"words and conceptual mind burn away like ashes" (文句及心皆同灰燼)—yet it cuts directly to the core, subduing and pacifying the listener's mind at its deepest root (必令聽者心得調伏) [13794, 16115].

The Harmony of Nītārtha and Neynārtha: The Four Classical Metaphors

Crucially, definitive truth does not invalidate or destroy provisional teachings; rather, it illuminates and fulfills them. As the *Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra* (《深密解脫經》) illustrates through four classical metaphors [11066]:

1. The Universal Medicinal Herb Metaphor (毘舒婆藥草喻): Just as a master physician inserts a potent healing herb (*Viśva*) into ordinary foods and drinks, the Nītārtha teaching (the truth of ultimate non-arising and non-ceasing) is embedded within all provisional scriptures to render them spiritually curative [11066]. 2. The Ground Painting Metaphor (畫地喻): Like a master painter who applies blue, yellow, red, and white pigments onto a canvas to create distinct images, Nītārtha teachings infuse provisional statements, unifying their varied appearances into "one single taste" (一味相) while retaining the clarity to distinguish conventional names [11066]. 3. The Refined Butter/Ghee Metaphor (熟酥喻): Adding rich ghee (*māṇḍa*) enriches any meal with exquisite flavor; embedding the definitive truth of "no inherent nature" into provisional teachings fills practitioners with supreme joy and enthusiasm (增上歡喜踴躍) [11066]. 4. The Space Metaphor (虛空喻): Just as open space pervades all places and accommodates every activity without hindrance, the definitive truth shares an equal, identical taste (等同一味) with all provisional teachings, unobstructedly fulfilling the paths of Śrāvakas, Pratyekabuddhas, and Bodhisattvas alike [11066].

Finally, as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* reminds us, while Nītārtha scriptures direct us to the ultimate reality (Real Meaning / 實義), the ultimate reality itself transcends speech and letters: *"The real meaning has no sound and no letters; because it transcends language, it is named the real meaning"* (實義無音聲,亦無有文字,超過語言故,乃名為實義) [14815].


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To see how Nītārtha and Neynārtha play out in modern experience, let us walk through a familiar contemporary scene: Navigating a high-stress workplace review or career setback.

``` [Scenario: Performance Review & Career Crisis] │ ├─► Level 1: Neynārtha (Provisional View) │ • "I failed the KPI. My manager hates me; my rival won." │ • Focuses on: Self, Agent/Receiver, Moral/Success polarities. │ • Reaction: Emotional volatility (swinging between pride and shame). │ • Method: Self-help, optimization, trying harder next quarter. │ └─► Level 2: Nītārtha (Definitive View) • "Who is the 'I' that failed? What is a 'KPI' beyond assigned labels?" • Focuses on: Emptiness of self, signlessness of 'success/failure'. • Reaction: Deep mental pacification, immediate liberation from narrative. • Method: Recognizing the intrinsic quietude of the present moment. ```

Step 1: The Conventional Trap (Neynārtha in Action)

Imagine you receive a harsh annual performance review. The project you worked on for six months was canceled, and your colleague was promoted instead.

* The Provisional Mindset: You immediately construct a vivid narrative populated by distinct entities: "I" (the sufferer), "My Boss" (the oppressor), and "My Colleague" (the competitor). In classical terminology, you are operating entirely within the conventional concepts of *pudgala* (數取者), agent, and receiver (作者受者) [13794, 16115]. * The Emotional Seesaw: You read career advice books telling you: "If you work hard, you will be rewarded; if you slack off, you will fail." This is the realm of "differentiated cultivation" and "believing in karma and reward" [13794]. When you try to fix it, you experience what the sūtras call "mind swinging between joy and sorrow" (心生欣戚): excitement when an email looks positive, acute anxiety when a meeting goes silent [13794].

Step 2: The Definitive Cut (Nītārtha in Action)

Now, bring the lens of a Nītārtha Sūtra to the exact same office chair.

* Deconstructing the Subject and Object: The Nītārtha perspective asks: Where is the solid, unchanging "I" that was demoted? Looking closely into your five aggregates, you find body sensations, fleeting thoughts, and emotional impulses—none of which possess a fixed "self" or "master" (無有主宰) [16115]. The label "failure" is an imputed sign (相), not an intrinsic property of reality. * Seeing "No Arising and No Ceasing" (諸法不生不滅): The crisis exists solely inside a constructed cognitive frame. In reality, sound waves left your boss's mouth, light patterns displayed on a monitor, and physical sensations occurred in your chest. The existential panic was added entirely by conceptual elaboration. * Transcending Dualism: Instead of "hating the office (Saṃsāra) and longing for a quiet retreat in Bali (Nirvāṇa)"—which the sūtras designate as a provisional, dualistic reaction ("厭背生死,欣樂涅槃")—the Nītārtha view reveals that the office cubicle and the tranquil retreat are "of one identical相, non-dual" (一相無二) [13794, 16115]. Peace is not found by changing geography, but by seeing through the non-substantial nature of the threat.

Where People Map This Wrong

* Common Error: People often think "applying Nītārtha" means acting irresponsibly—quitting their job, ignoring emails, or pretending work doesn't matter while feeling secretly bitter. * Correction: That is not Nītārtha; that is *nihilistic apathy* masked as emptiness. As the Ground Painting Metaphor shows, Nītārtha does not erase the lines and colors of conventional life; it recognizes them clearly while realizing they are drawn on the same unified canvas [11066]. You still reply to your boss and submit reports, but the *existential terror* generated by self-clinging vanishes because "the words and conceptual mind have turned to ashes" (文句及心皆同灰燼), leaving the heart thoroughly subdued and pacified (心得調伏) [13794, 16115].


Why Contemporary People Need It

Modern society is hyper-optimized for Neynārtha (provisional structures). From school grading systems and social media metrics (likes, followers) to corporate OKRs, gamified apps, and credit scores, our lives are dictated by rules that say: *"If you do A, you get reward B; if you do C, you suffer punishment D."*

While these conventional frameworks maintain social order, living *exclusively* within them causes systemic mental exhaustion. When every aspect of existence is framed as a endless series of tasks, achievements, and moral balances, the human mind suffers from chronic fatigue and emotional oscillation (心生欣戚) [13794].

The Cognitive and Algorithmic Analogy

Consider how modern Artificial Intelligence operates: * An AI Large Language Model or Recommendation Algorithm operates strictly within symbolic systems (provisional rules). It processes tokens, calculates reward functions, optimizes loss curves, and generates complex outputs. It excels at "differentiated pathways" and rules. * However, no matter how sophisticated an algorithm becomes, it remains trapped within its parameter space. It cannot step *outside* language to perceive the unconstructed, unencoded reality.

Human beings in modern society often live like algorithms: continually calculating social karma, optimizing personal branding, and worrying about performance metrics.

Nītārtha is the ultimate "exit code." It is not another self-improvement protocol or life hack to add to your routine. It is the radical realization that the entire conceptual grid—your ego narrative, your status anxiety, your fear of missing out—is fundamentally unconstructed (無作) and inherently empty (自性空) [13794, 11066].

*Note on Analogy:* While cognitive science and neuroscience observe that the brain constructs predictive models of reality (similar to the Buddhist insight into "provisional signs"), scientific models remain empirical hypotheses framed within conventional language. Nītārtha goes further: it is an experiential, non-dual awakening that transcends all conceptual and empirical frameworks entirely.


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "Provisional scriptures (Neynārtha) are wrong or useless, so we should burn them and only read Nītārtha."

* Clarification: This is a serious misunderstanding of the Buddhist teaching. The scriptures explicitly state that Nītārtha does not abolish Neynārtha. As shown by the Universal Medicinal Herb Metaphor and the Refined Butter Metaphor, Nītārtha gives flavor, potency, and direction to provisional teachings [11066]. Without provisional teachings (morality, basic mindfulness, cause-and-effect understanding), a person jumping straight into "emptiness" risks falling into destructive nihilism. Provisional teachings are the essential scaffolding; definitive teachings are the ultimate discovery.

Misinterpretation 2: "If everything is non-arising and non-ceasing (Nītārtha), then moral cause and effect (Karma) doesn't matter."

* Clarification: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* warns that ultimate reality (勝義諦) transcends speech and concepts, but it does not deny conventional reality (世俗諦) on its own plane [14815, 16115]. The realization of Nītārtha does not make one reckless; rather, because one sees the ultimate empty nature of all things, one naturally stops generating the selfish afflictions that produce negative karma. True realization of Nītārtha results in supreme pacification (心得調伏), not chaotic or unethical behavior [13794].

Misinterpretation 3: "I understand the concept of emptiness intellectually, so I have mastered the Nītārtha Sūtra."

* Clarification: Intellectual comprehension is still a form of conceptual elaboration (分別). The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* explicitly reminds us that the true reality pointed to by Nītārtha "has no sound and no letters" (無音聲,亦無有文字) [14815]. It cannot be possessed as an intellectual opinion. Merely repeating the slogan "everything is empty" is still playing with provisional concepts. Realizing Nītārtha means the internal mental chatter and ego-clinging actually "burn down like ashes" (文句及心皆同灰燼), bringing about genuine, unwavering peace [13794, 16115].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 了义经(nītārtha-sūtra)是佛教中指代直接宣说第一义谛、空性、无生、无体相,引导修行者直达究竟解脱的经典。与之相对的是“不了义经”。在《大寶積經》中,了义经被视为菩萨修行般若波罗蜜多的重要准则,经中明确指出菩萨应当“不依趣不了义经依趣了义经”,其核心指向“如性法义”与“实义”。在《大方等大集經》中,“依了義經不依不了義經”(或表述为“依了义经舍不了义”)被确立为菩萨摩诃萨修行所依凭的“四依”之一。而在《深密解脫經》中,了义经(又称了义修多罗、了义言教)的核心义理则被阐释为宣说“诸法无有体相”,即“诸法不生、诸法不灭、诸法寂静、诸法自性涅槃”的“第一义相”。 二、主要阐述 综合各经论述,了义经与不了义经在多个维度上存在本质区别: 1. 真理层次与实相认知:了义经宣说“胜义谛”(第一义),而不了义经宣说“世俗谛”。了义经直接宣说“空、无相、无愿、无生、无起、亦无出现”及“三解脱门”,或宣说“空、无相、无愿、无作、无生”与“无量诸解脱门”;而不了义经则顺应世俗,宣说有我、有情、命者、养者、数取趣者等种种人我执见。 2. 生死与涅槃的见地:不了义经宣说“厌背生死欣乐涅槃”,或宣说“生死苦恼”的差别相;而了义经则开示“生死涅槃二无差别”或“生死涅槃一相无二”的平等不二之理。 3. 修行导向与断证境界:不了义经侧重于“分别修道”,宣说“道”的言教,或宣说“所作行业信有果报”,并诃责作业烦恼等染污之法;而了义经则宣说“果”的言教,直接“尽诸烦恼”,宣说烦恼业尽、修治清净,且“不分别果”。 4. 文字表述与说相形式:不了义经偏重于“广文”或“赞说种种庄严文字”,宣说种种文句差别以令众生心意踊跃,或宣说“罪福相”使听者“心生欣慼”;而了义经则“说甚深经难持难了”,其文句甚深难见难觉,“文句及心皆同灰烬”,但能直指人心,“必令听者心得调伏”。 5. 了义与不了义的圆融关系:根据《深密解脫經》,了义经并不排斥不了义经,而是通过四种生动的譬喻阐明两者的圆融关系:其一为“毘舒婆药草喻”,了义修多罗置于一切不了义中,如药草置于一切饮食;其二为“画地喻”,了义言教置于不了义中能使其“成一味相”,并能了别不了义的名字;其三为“熟酥喻”,了义修多罗能令众生生起“增上欢喜踊跃”;其四为“虚空喻”,了义经与不了义经“等同一味”,无障碍地成就三乘修行者的修行。 三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 各经在阐述相关概念时,所使用的术语存在明显的部类与译本差异: 1. 人我执术语的差异:对于世俗人我执的描述,《大寶積經》使用了“我、有情、命者、养者、数取趣者、意生、摩纳婆、作者、受者”这一长串术语,并将“补特伽罗”独特地译为“数取者”;而《大方等大集經》则使用“我人、众生、寿命、养育、士夫、作者受者”这一特定系列术语。 2. 五蕴与受蕴的表述:《大寶積經》在论述不了义时,使用了“受蕴”这一术语(如“立有种种受蕴无有主宰”)。 3. 善法的表述:针对清净善法,《大方等大集經》使用了独特的“白淨法”一词(如“赞白净法”);而《大寶積經》则表述为“修治清净”。 4. 经典名称与法门命名:《深密解脫經》中,除了“了义经”外,还频繁使用“了义修多罗”和“了义言教”。在不同的法会情境中,该经还将了义法门具体命名为“说第一义了义修多罗”或“说诸佛如来住持力了义经”。 5. 了义指向的表述:《大寶積經》将了义称为“如性法义”,并深入探讨了“实义”。 四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与“不了义经”的关系:两者是相对立而又相辅相成的教法。菩萨修行应当“不依不了义经,依了义经”。了义经如药草、熟酥、虚空般融入不了义经中,使其“成一味相”。 2. 与“四依”的关系:“依了义经不依不了义经”是菩萨修行的“四依”之一,是辨别佛陀教法究竟与否的根本准则。 3. 与“实义/第一义”的关系:了义经直指第一义,但《大寶積經》强调“实义”本身是超越语言文字的,即“实义无音声,亦无有文字,超过语言故,乃名为实义”。在第一义中,“诸受但世谛,第一义中无”,“无佛及佛法,亦无余智聚”,“若义及法实,无有能了者,无说亦无证”。 4. 功德对比:受持、读诵或信受“了义修多罗”的功德,远远超越修行“不了义修多罗”所得的功德,后者甚至不及前者的极少分。 五、代表性原文引用 1. 《大寶積經》论实义:“实义无音声,亦无有文字,超过语言故,乃名为实义。” 2. 《大方等大集經》论了义与不了义之别:“不了义经分别修道,了义经者不分别果,尽诸烦恼。” 3. 《深密解脫經》论了义核心:“了义修多罗者,说诸法无有体相,所谓诸法不生、诸法不灭、诸法寂静、诸法自性涅槃,是名第一义相。”

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《寶積》此段論述「了義經」,係以菩薩修行般若波羅蜜多為前提而展開。經文先以「識」與「智」之對辨作為前導:由所緣境、作意、遍分別而生之相名為識,有生有滅有住;反之,無取無執無緣無了別無所分別、無生無滅亦無所住者名為智。菩薩摩訶薩依般若波羅蜜多故「依趣於智,不依趣於識」,由此進一步推向對經典之揀別。

關於何者為了義、何者不了義,經文先給出一總綱:菩薩善能通達時,若先所說為「廣文」,此即名為不了義經,不應依趣;若先所說為「廣義」,此即名為了義經際,則可依趣。此處以「廣文」與「廣義」對舉,「文」側指文句之施設,「義」側指究竟所詮之理,凸顯此經以義理之究竟與否作為判別準據,此乃此段獨特之術語形式。

繼而經中列舉八對相對之判據,使二種經教之分際更具體可依:第一,宣說於道為不了義,宣說於果為了義。第二,說世俗諦為不了義,說勝義諦為了義。第三,宣說作業煩惱惑染為不了義,宣說煩惱業盡為了義。第四,訶責染污之法為不了義,宣說修治清淨為了義。第五,厭背生死、欣樂涅槃為不了義,宣說生死涅槃二無差別為了義。第六,宣說種種文句差別為不了義,說甚深難見難覺為了義。第七,文句廣博、能令眾生心意踊躍為不了義,宣說文句及心皆同灰燼為了義。第八,宣說有我、有情、命者、養者、數取趣者、意生、摩納婆、作者、受者,乃至說種種受蘊無有主宰者,名不了義。

此八對之精神貫通一致:凡隨順施設名言、引生心識之踊躍、安立彼此之對待者,皆判為不了義;凡直顯甚深寂滅、能令心與文皆同灰燼、不落能詮所詮之別者,方判為了義。經末特別以「有我等之施設」一條作結,並指出此等言教「不應依趣」,顯示揀擇之歸趣在於離能所執,而非僅止於義理之辨析。

整段論述皆以「菩薩摩訶薩依般若波羅蜜多故善能分別」為前提,了義之建立並非離於觀行之獨立懸設;唯有依般若之慧,方能於諸經教中善辨廣文與廣義、世俗與勝義、生死與涅槃之差別。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》將「依了義經不依不了義經」一科,列為菩薩摩訶薩「四依無盡」之一(其餘三者為:依義不依語、依智不依識、依法不依於人),以之為大乘行者根本依準之一。

本經對於「了義經」並無正面之名義定義,而是採取了義經與不了義經對比列舉的方式,從七個面向顯示二者的差別,由此間接彰顯了義經的體性:

一、就修道與證果而言:不了義經「分別修道」,了義經「不分別果」。

二、就行業與斷惑而言:不了義經令行者「信有果報」,了義經則「盡諸煩惱」。

三、就訶斥與讚歎而言:不了義經「訶諸煩惱」,了義經則「讚白淨法」——「白淨法」一詞為本經所特出,值得留意。

四、就生死涅槃之相而言:不了義經「說生死苦惱」,了義經則示「生死涅槃一相無二」。

五、就文字與甚深而言:不了義經「讚說種種莊嚴文字」,了義經則「說甚深經難持難了」。

六、就攝受之效而言:不了義經「多為眾生說罪福相,令聞法者心生欣慼」,了義經則「凡所演說,必令聽者心得調伏」。

七、就我法之說而言:不了義經雖說諸法無有施者受者,然仍「為他說有施有受」,廣說我人、眾生、壽命、養育、士夫、作者受者等種種文辭;了義經則「說空、無相、無願、無作、無生」,遠離我人等見,「常說無量諸解脫門」。

本經論述之獨特側面有四:

(一)將了義經之依止置於「四依無盡」之整體結構中,與依義、依智、依法互為關聯,非孤立而談,彰顯其作為大乘修行總依準的地位。

(二)以「盡諸煩惱」為了義經在斷惑上的作用,以「生死涅槃一相無二」為了義經究竟義理之標幟,於斷證二門皆顯示了義經之究竟顯示。

(三)以「難持難了」形容了義經之相貌,與不了義經之「種種莊嚴文字」形成鮮明對比,凸顯了義經之深邃性。

(四)以「心得調伏」為了義經之攝受力,與不了義經之「心生欣慼」對舉;又以「說空、無相、無願、無作、無生」與「常說無量諸解脫門」總攝了義經所說之內容,與不了義經之施受文辭形成對比。

術語方面,本經於我人、眾生、壽命、養育、士夫、作者受者等概念並列舉出,「養育」「士夫」二詞常與「作者受者」相連,構成其獨特之術語風格;此外,「白淨法」「欣慼」「調伏」三詞亦頗具本經特色。本經於七對對比之後,總結云「是名依了義經、不依不了義經」,彰顯此科之圓滿。

深密解脫經T0675 · 經集部

本經對「了義經」的論述集中於經文末段,佛陀親自為本經命名並揭示其了義性質,以下分四點說明。

一、本經自稱為「了義經」。文殊師利請問此深密解脫修多羅中此法門當名何等、云何奉持時,佛陀明確回答:「此法門名『說諸佛如來住持力了義經』」,直接以「了義經」三字標示本經的究竟性質,亦是經中對「了義經」概念最直接的呈現——本經即是了義經,且其了義內涵在於宣說諸佛如來的住持之力。

二、佛陀以「汝當奉持」勸勉行者受持了義之法。經云:「如來所說了義修多羅,其義如是,汝當奉持」,顯示了義經非僅為名稱上的標示,而是具有實質可奉持的究竟義理。此處「了義修多羅」與前文「了義經」並用,可知本經以「經」與「修多羅」(梵語 sūtra 之音譯)互稱,二者所指同一,為本經術語形式上一項明顯特色。

三、聞此了義經之殊勝果證。經末載:「說此如來住持力了義經時,七萬五千菩薩得滿足法身」。此一果證記載,凸顯了義經具有令無量菩薩證得法身究竟圓滿的力用,亦從行者證量側面印證本經之了義性。

四、本經論述「了義經」時,將其與「諸佛如來住持力」緊密結合,與經名「深密解脫」之主題相呼應——諸佛住持之力正是深密之法得以解脫的關鍵,而此究竟法義即由了義經直接顯示。此一將「了義」與「如來住持力」並提的論述側面,為本經所獨具,凸顯其了義之說非抽象空談,而是立足於佛力住持的具體法門。

Related