Dharma · AI Companion

意業

manaḥ-karman

由心意造作形成的善恶业。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying (这个概念在说什么)

In the Buddha's teachings on liberation, human existence unfolds through action—known in Sanskrit as *karma* (業, *yè*). Classical Buddhism categorizes all human actions into the "Three Karmas" (*sānyè* 三業): physical action (*shēnyè* 身業), verbal action (*kǒuyè* 口業 / *yǔyè* 語業), and mental action—the karma of intent (*yìyè* 意業, Sanskrit: *manaḥ-karman*).

While popular culture often views "karma" solely as external deeds or spoken words, the early canonical sutras, such as the *Madhyama Āgama* (*Zhōng Āhán Jīng* 中阿含經), make a definitive declaration: among the three karmas, the karma of intent is the most pivotal and severe (*yìyè wéi zuì zhòng* 意業為最重). It is the prime mover and ultimate origin of all bodily and verbal manifestations.

To understand *yìyè* precisely according to classical canonical definitions, we must dissect its exact inner structure rather than reducing it to generic "thinking" or "attitudes":

1. The Core Volition: *Cetanā* (思, *sī*)

In the *Madhyama Āgama* (as illustrated in the discourse with the householder Upāli), the Buddha explicitly equates *yìyè* with *sī* (思, Sanskrit: *cetanā*)—the mental volition, direction, or conscious intent. *Cetanā* is the psychological function that "steers" or "propels" the mind toward an object. Unintentional or purely involuntary physiological reflexes do not constitute full karmic accumulation in the classical sense; it is *gùzuò yè* (故作業, intentional karma driven by *cetanā*) that produces binding psychological and existential consequences.

2. The Distinction Between "Intent" (*Yì*) and "Karma of Intent" (*Yìyè*)

A crucial clarification appears in the eastern Jin translation of the *Avatamsaka Sūtra* (*Huáyán Jīng* 華嚴經, T0278): * Intent (*yì* 意): Refers to cognitive, observational, and reflective operations of the mind, such as initial perception (*jué* 覺, *vitarka*), sustained evaluation (*guān* 觀, *vicāra*), recollection (*yìniàn* 憶念), non-forgetting (*bùwàng* 不忘), conceptual deliberation (*sīwéi* 思惟), or internal mental imagery like illusions (*huàn* 幻) and dreams (*mèng* 夢). * Karma of Intent (*yìyè* 意業): Refers to the mental *fabrications, choices, and affective reactivity* generated by those cognitive acts. It includes mental discrimination (*xiǎng* 想), deliberate mental structuring or narrative building (*shèshī* 設施), as well as the internal reactive swings between emotional and somatic polarities—such as cold/heat, hunger/thirst, suffering/pleasure, and anxiety/joy (*hán, rè, jī, kě, kǔ, lè, yōu, xǐ* 寒熱飢渴苦樂憂喜).

In short, *yì* (intent) is the cognitive stage where the mind perceives and mirrors objects, while *yìyè* (mental karma) is the volitional engine that takes hold of those perceptions, colors them with craving or aversion, forms mental habits, and initiates action.

3. The Structural Levels of *Yìyè* in Mahāyāna Realization

As the Buddhist teachings unfold into Mahāyāna literature (such as the *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra* / *Dà Bǎojī Jīng* 大寶積經 and the *Avatamsaka Sūtra*), *yìyè* is examined through deeper layers:

* **Three-Period Self-Inspection (*Sānshì Shěngchá* 三世省察):** In the *Madhyama Āgama*, the Buddha instructs his son Rāhula (*Luóyún* 羅雲) to inspect mental karma like looking into a clear mirror. One scrutinizes past, present, and future mental karma: if an intention was/is/will be unwholesome, impure, and conducive to suffering, it must be abandoned (*shě* 捨); if wholesome, pure, and conducive to peace, it must be cultivated and sustained (*shòu* 受). * **Metta Mental Karma (*Cí Yìyè* 慈意業):** In communal living, *cí yìyè* (loving-kindness in mental action) is highlighted as the primary condition for harmony. It is defined in practice as "relinquishing one's own egoistic mental agenda and attuning to the well-being of others" (*zì shě jǐ xīn, suí bǐ zhū xián xīn* 自捨己心,隨彼諸賢心), maintaining equal goodwill whether observed or unobserved. * **World-Creating Power (*Xīnyè Lì* 心業力):** The *Avatamsaka Sūtra* observes that "all Buddha-lands arise from heart-karma" (*zhūfó guótǔ, qǐ yóu xīnyè* 諸佛國土,起由心業). The subtle interior conditioning of sentient minds builds the subjective worlds and lived realities they inhabit. * **Emptiness of the Mind-Realm (*Yìjiè Xìngkōng* 意界性空) & *Yì Sānmièi* (意三昧):** At its ultimate depth, the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* points out that if one searches inside or outside, the "mind-realm" (*yìjiè* 意界) has no physical shape or localized entity—it is like a phantom. Directly realizing the empty, ungraspable nature of mental volition is called the "Samādhi of Intent" (*yì sānmièi* 意三昧).


Walking Through Life: Contemporary Scenarios (生活里的走查)

To see how *yìyè* operates without confusing it with superficial concepts, let us step into familiar moments of modern life—commuting, scrolling algorithms, late-night overtime, and family disputes.

Scenario 1: The Morning Commute & Delayed Trains

* **Sensory Input & *Yì* (Cognitive Perception):** You step onto the platform; the display board flashes red: "Train delayed 25 minutes." Your mind recognizes the words, recalls your upcoming 9:00 AM presentation, and projects the scenario of being late (*jué, guān, yìniàn* 覺、觀、憶念). This cognitive mapping itself is *yì* (intent), not yet full *yìyè*. * **The Ignition of *Yìyè* (Mental Karma):** Within milliseconds, volition (*cetanā* / 思) intervenes. You internally construct a narrative (*shèshī* 設施): *"The transit system is incompetent, my boss will judge me, my day is ruined."* Emotional reactivity flares—irritation, tightness in the chest (*yōu, xǐ, kǔ, lè* 憂喜苦樂). You begin mentally cursing the transit operators or rehearsing aggressive excuses. * Common Mismapping: People often assume "mental karma" is the delay itself or the involuntary brief worry that crossed the mind. In canonical terms, the *yìyè* is the deliberate internal steering: choosing to feed resentment, dwelling on catastrophic inner dialogues, and generating ill-will.

Scenario 2: Social Media Scrolling & Algorithmic Triggers

* **Cognitive Activity (*Yì*):** You scroll through a social media feed. An acquaintance posts photos of an expensive vacation or a career promotion. Your brain processes the image and text (*xiǎng* 想 / *jué* 覺). * **Mental Karma (*Yìyè*):** If volition (*cetanā*) turns toward covert envy, subtle malicious hope that they fail, or self-pitying comparison, *yìyè* has been generated. Even if your body remains motionless on the couch and you type no comments (no bodily or verbal karma yet), a heavy, contracting mental habit has been reinforced. * **The Mirror Inspection (*Sānshì Shěngchá*):** Applying the *Madhyama Āgama* mirror technique in real-time, you catch this moment: *"Is this present mental karma pure or impure? Does it build peace or internal suffering?"* Observing its bitter fruit, you consciously release the envy and replace it with *cí yìyè* (loving-kindness / appreciative joy), wishing them genuine well-being.

Scenario 3: Overtime Slack Messages & Domestic Friction

* The Workplace Impulse: It is 10:00 PM. A notification pings with a demanding request. An immediate surge of anger arises. If you instantly draft a sarcastic reply, your *yìyè* has already manifested into verbal karma (*kǒuyè*). But if you pause, catch the rising urge (*cetanā*), examine its unwholesome trajectory, and hold it with mindfulness until the heat dissipates, you have engaged in *yìyè* protection (*hù yìyè* 護意業). * **In Intimate Relationships (*Cí Yìyè*):** During a heated discussion with a partner, *cí yìyè* manifests not as superficial polite words, but as "relinquishing one's rigid egoistic stance to truly listen" (*zì shě jǐ xīn* 自捨己心). You let go of the internal compulsion to win the argument, neutralizing hidden hostility at the source.


Why Contemporary People Need It (当代人为什么需要它)

Modern life is engineered to exploit human volition. We live in an "attention economy" where sophisticated algorithms, real-time metrics, and non-stop notifications constantly hijack our micro-volitions (*cetanā*).

1. Reclaiming Agency in the Algorithmic Age

Today, immense physical effort is rarely required to alter the world; a tap of a finger sends payments, publishes messages, or launches automated tasks. As bodily labor contracts, our life experience is almost entirely dictated by our mental karma. Algorithms feed on unexamined *yìyè*—our subtle impulses of outrage, fear, vanity, and addiction. Understanding *yìyè* allows us to inspect the "steering wheel" of our inner life before the algorithm drives us into emotional exhaustion.

2. The Illusion of Modern Neuro-reductionism vs. The Scope of *Yìyè*

Modern cognitive neuroscience and AI models provide fascinating insights into neural correlates, reward pathways, and predictive processing. Brain-scanning tools can trace electrical impulses when choices occur, and Large Language Models can mimic reflective language (*jué, guān, sīwéi*).

However, contemporary scientific reductionism often treats consciousness as merely a passive byproduct of hardware (neurons or algorithms), frequently overlooking the karmic and ethical dimension of volition. A brain-scan can show dopamine spikes during envy or anger, but it cannot perform the inner ethical discernment (*sānshì shěngchá*) of releasing unwholesome volition to transform lived existential reality. Furthermore, neuroscience remains engaged in unresolved debates regarding the hard problem of consciousness and subjective experience. Buddhist *yìyè* does not conflict with neuroscientific discoveries, but it operates on an existential and liberative scale: showing how inner volitional habits construct our subjective world (*xīnyè lì* 心業力) and providing an actionable path to undo psychological suffering.

3. Root-Level Psychological Hygiene

Addressing behavior only at the level of body and speech (e.g., trying forced polite speech while holding deep resentment inside) creates internal hypocrisy and stress. The canonical emphasis that "intent karma is the most severe" reminds us that true mental health and peace require cleaning the water at the springhead, rather than filtering it at the mouth of the river.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications (常见误读与澄清)

Misreading 1: "Mental karma means fleeting thoughts are bad, so having a random negative thought makes me a sinful person."

* Clarification: The Buddha explicitely distinguished between unintentional mental phenomena and deliberate karma (*gùzuò yè* 故作業 vs. *bù gùzuò yè* 不故作業). Fleeting memories, automatic brain conditioning, or intrusive thoughts that pop into consciousness uninvited are not in themselves binding *yìyè*. *Yìyè* requires the alignment of volition (*sī* / *cetanā*)—the act of seizing that intrusive thought, identifying with it, dwelling on it, and constructing a narrative around it.

Misreading 2: "Buddhism only cares about the mind, so physical actions and words don't really matter ('Only intent is real, body/speech are false')."

* Clarification: This exact misunderstanding existed during the Buddha's time. In the *Madhyama Āgama*, the wanderer Pūraṇa (哺羅陀子) falsely claimed that the Buddha taught "body and speech are false, only mental karma is real". The Venerable Samiddhi corrected this slander. The Buddha taught that while *yìyè* is the chief initiator and most fundamental, physical and verbal actions carry real, tangible consequences (*yè bào* 業報). Mental karma is supreme because it controls body and speech, not because body and speech are non-existent illusions to be ignored.

Misreading 3: "Mental karma is just my personal private thoughts; it doesn't affect anyone else."

* Clarification: The *Avatamsaka Sūtra* and *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* demonstrate that our mental posture ripples outward. A room filled with people who hold unexpressed hostility or underlying anxiety creates a palpable, defensive environment. Conversely, cultivating *cí yìyè* (loving-kindness in mental karma) actively fosters harmony, trust, and mutual respect in communities, even before a single word is spoken.

Misreading 4: "Working on *yìyè* means forcefully suppressing all bad thoughts."

* Clarification: Canonical instruction does not advocate violent inner suppression. In the instructions to Rāhula, the method is mirror-like inspection (*shěngchá* 省察). One observes the mental karma clearly as if seeing a reflection: noticing its presence, evaluating whether it leads to suffering or peace, and simply letting go (*shě* 捨) of unwholesome paths while sustaining (*shòu* 受) wholesome ones. Furthermore, realizing the ultimate emptiness of the mind-realm (*yìjiè xìngkōng* 意界性空) allows one to rest in the "Samādhi of Intent" (*yì sānmièi* 意三昧), where mental fabrications naturally dissolve into spacious, unshakeable clarity.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

意业(manaḥ-karman)是佛教“三业”(身业、口业、意业)之一,指由心意、意志(“思”)所发动的造作、思维及心理活动。在《中阿含经》中,世尊明确指出意业在三业中最为严重,是防范恶业、修行净业的关键。意业不仅是个人修行的核心,在《大宝积经》与《大方广佛华严经》中,它还被赋予了空性本质、庄严国土、成就功德等更深层次的义理内涵。

2. 主要阐述

意业的修持、省察与防护:修行者需对意业进行严密的省察与防护。根据《中阿含经》,佛陀教导罗云应如镜照面般,从过去、未来、现在三世省察意业。若省察到过去、未来或现在所起意业为不净、不善且受苦报,应当舍弃;若为净、善且受乐报,则应受持。通过这种“已观而观,已净而净”的方式,修行者得以成就修行。在菩萨修行中,防护意业同样至关重要。《大宝积经》指出,初业菩萨若乐于憒闹,将带来不护意业等过失;菩萨应当追求“意业无失”、“意业清净”与“意业不动”,做到“意业常居善,曾无乐诸恶”。

慈意业与僧团和合:在僧团共处中,“慈意业”具有促进和合的重要作用。《中阿含经》中,尊者阿那律陀等分享修行经验时提到,他们对同修梵行者常行慈意业,且“见与不见,等无有异”,具体表现为“自舍己心,随彼诸贤心”。佛陀亦将“慈意业”列为“六慰劳法”之一,是令僧众相爱敬、得一心、得精进乃至涅槃的关键。

意业的空性与如来功德:《大宝积经》从般若空观剖析意业,指出“意界”不在内、不在外,亦不可聚集,犹如幻化,无住无处所,若能了知意界“性空”,即称为“意三昧”。观察意业天子亦赞叹意业是佛地,佛智无体性。如来在心业(意业)上具足不共佛法,其心无有误失,能发起诸佛事而不役神虑,并能如实了知众生身、语、心业清净与否的差别相。

意业的庄严力量与净土状态:《大方广佛华严经》强调意业(心业)具有不可思议的造作与庄严力量,指出“诸佛国土,起由心业”,世间无量庄严皆是“诸心业力,之所庄严”。在因陀幢如来的佛土中,则完全不存在“不净意业”,众生的一切意业皆是“智上首、智顺转”。此外,菩萨若能成就清净意业等三业,便能获得一切天魔外道不能动的胜妙功德,并在安住法界时进行“法界无量意业回向”,成就等同于法界的清净意业。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类及译本中,对于“意业”及相关概念的用词存在明显差异: * 意业与心业:《大宝积经》(唐菩提流志译)中,“意业”常与“心业”、“心”、“心体”或“内心”交替使用,如在论述诸行清净时交替使用“心业清净”、“心体非清净”与“内心常清净”;在阐释如来功德时使用“心业误失”。而《大方广佛华严经》(东晋佛驮跋陀罗译)中,也常以“心业”或“心业力”指代心意所发动的造作与力量。 * 五蕴的译语:在涉及与意业相关的五蕴概念时,《大方广佛华严经》(东晋译本)使用的是“五阴”或“阴”(如“平等阴”、“远离于五阴”),并将其具体表述为“妙色”与“妙受、想、行、识”。 * 意界:《大宝积经》还使用“意界”一词来探讨意业的本质,并提出“意三昧”之说。

4. 与相关概念的关系

* 意业与身业、口业(语业):意业与身业、口业并称“三业”。《中阿含经》强调三业之中“意业为最重”。同时,经中驳斥了“身、口业虚妄,唯意业真谛”的错误见解,指出世尊真实教法并非独尊意业,而是强调“故作业”(故意造作)与“不故作业”的区别。 * 意与意业:《大方广佛华严经》对“意”与“意业”进行了明确区分:“意”侧重于心识的认知与思维活动,包括“觉、观、忆念、不忘、思惟、幻、梦”等;而“意业”则偏向于心意造作所呈现的状态与反应,包括“想”、“设施”,以及“寒、热、饥、渴、苦、乐、忧、喜”等身心感受与情感起伏。 * 意业与思:《中阿含经》中,通过优婆离居士与世尊的问答,将“思”(主观意图或意志)直接等同于“意业”。

5. 代表性原文引用

* 《中阿含经》:“此三业如是不同,作相不同,我立意业最重,令不行恶业,不作恶业,身业、口业则不然。” * 《中阿含经》:“若过去意业,已过去、已灭、已变易。彼若不净、不善、受苦报者,汝当舍彼过去意业。” * 《大宝积经》:“若能了知意界性空,是名意三昧。” * 《大方广佛华严经》:“诸佛国土,起由心业……一切世间之所有,种种果报各不同,莫不皆由行业成。” * 《大方广佛华严经》:“意者,非意业。意者,谓觉、观、忆念、不忘、思惟、幻、梦……意业者,谓想、设施,寒、热、饥、渴、苦、乐、忧、喜。”

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》中對「意業」的論述,可從以下幾方面理解。

一、三業並列,意業最重 《中阿含經》明確將眾生的造作分為身業、口業、意業三種,並指出三者各別:「身業異、口業異、意業異也」。在此三業之中,本經特別強調意業的分量最重——世尊回答長苦行尼揵時再三宣說:「此三業如是相似,我施設意業為最重,令不行惡業,不作惡業。身業、口業則不然也」,並進一步以偈頌提醒:「身業、口業、意業,羅云!善不善法,汝應常觀」。

二、意業即是「思」 《中阿含經》透過與優婆離居士的問答,將意業的內涵直接等同於「思」——居士以「思」作答時,世尊追問其意,確認「意業是也」,可見本經以思(心的取捨、意志的抉擇)作為意業的實質內涵。

三、觀察意業淨染的修行架構 本經對意業的觀察,採「因過去行故已生」、「因未來行故當生」、「因現在行故現生」三時段架構,與身業所用的「將作、現作、已作」架構用語不同。觀察的內容包括:意業為淨為不淨、為自為他,並對照其果報——不淨者「不善與苦果受於苦報」應捨離,淨者「善與樂果受於樂報」應受持。世尊教誡羅云應當「現觀而觀,現淨而淨」此身口意三業。

四、慈意業作為善行的具體落實 多處經文提及「行慈意業」,與慈身業、慈口業並列,為向諸梵行所行之慈行,無論見與不見皆等無有異。慈意業並被列入「六慰勞法」之一,能令愛令重、令修令攝,得沙門、得一心、得精進、得涅槃。

五、破斥偏重意業的邪見 《中阿含經》亦記載有人誤傳世尊「身、口業虛妄,唯意業真諦」之說,尊者三彌提嚴正指出此為誣謗世尊,並重申世尊教法:「若故作業,作已成者,我說無不受報……若不故作業,作已成者,我不說必受報也」。可見本經並非廢身口業而獨重意業,而是於並修中以意業最為根本。

綜觀《中阿含經》對意業的論述,可見其獨特之處在於:一方面以「思」定其內涵、突出其於三業中最重;另一方面又將意業納入過去、現在、未來三時觀察架構,並與身口業並修而不偏廢。本經統一以「意業」為術語,未見其他異稱。

大方廣佛華嚴經(六十華嚴)T0278 · 華嚴部

【六十華嚴論「意業」之要義】

一、術語並用:「意業」與「心業」

此經中論及由心造作之業,主要使用「意業」一詞,然於涉及國土莊嚴之宇宙觀層面,則多以「心業」表達。兩者並存而各有側重:「意業」見於與身業、口業並列之三業結構中,屬較為形式化的分類術語;「心業」則用於描述世界生成之動力根源,具有更為深廣的意涵。

二、作為國土生成之根本動力——心業莊嚴

六十華嚴最具特色的論述,是將「心業」與諸佛國土的生起直接連結。經云:「諸佛國土,起由心業,無量種形,而以莊嚴」,明示一切佛剎之成立,皆由心業所感,故能顯現無量形相以為莊嚴。又云:「一切業海,不可思議」、「諸心業力,之所莊嚴」,強調業力深廣不可思議,如幻如虛空,卻能成就種種佛剎。偈頌亦云:「分別說心業,莊飾諸世間,知心業自性,現身等眾生」,可知心業既能莊嚴器世間,亦能感得應化身,與眾生數量相等。

三、身口意三業並列——菩薩功德所依

此經在多處將意業與身業、口業並列,作為菩薩修持之三大行門。如:「菩薩身、口、意業能得一切勝妙功德」,三者皆為成就無上菩提之依據。在迴向法門中,經云:「法界無量意業迴向」、「安住法界等無量清淨意業」,意業被視為可清淨、可迴向之對象,菩薩安住於法界中,令意業與身業、口業同歸清淨。

四、十種觀察中之意業觀

六十華嚴於十住道地之修習中,提出「十種之法」作為觀察對象,即:身、身業、口、口業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒。其中「意」與「意業」分別列舉,顯示此經對心識活動與心之行業作出細分。經中以反問方式啟發觀照:「若意業是梵行者,當知想是梵行;施設是梵行;寒、熱、飢、渴、苦、樂、憂、喜等悉是梵行」,意即:若認定意業即是梵行,則一切心之所想、思惟、受感皆為梵行。此觀法旨在破除執著,令行者不住於相。

五、術語形式與他譯用詞之對照

此經在涉及五蘊時使用「陰」字(如「平等陰」),與其他譯本所用「蘊」字不同。又,「心業」與「意業」雖皆指由心所造之業,然在本經中實有微妙區別:「意業」側重意志造作之業,與身業、口業對稱;「心業」則更具體指向心識所感之業力,與國土、世間之莊嚴相聯。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》就「意業」之論述,涵蓋其清淨與否之相、如來意業無誤失之德、純淨佛土之意業相貌、意業之佛地地位,以及不護意業之過患。

一、菩薩成就與意業無失

舍利子啟請佛陀開示:菩薩摩訶薩成就幾法,方能「意業無失」乃至「意業清淨」「意業不動」,不為天魔及魔軍眾嬈轉,從初發一切智心修行正行,地地增勝善巧方便,為一切眾生作勝導師。此處將意業之無失、清淨、不動並列為菩薩成就之德相。

二、意業清淨之差別相

如來以無礙智見如實了知諸行差別,其中有「或有諸行心業清淨非由身語」「或有諸行語業清淨非由身心」「或有諸行內心常清淨,身語二業非清淨」等種種差別。意業之清淨不必與身語業同步,可獨自清淨或獨不清淨,顯示其獨立之業相性格。

三、如來意業無誤失之德

經中說明「如來之心無有誤失」,世間若愚若智皆不能伺求如來心業之失。何以故?如來不捨甚深定法而能任運作諸佛事,於一切法無礙智見任運而轉,故說心無誤失;如來亦以此法開示眾生,令其永斷心業誤失,名為如來第一諸業無有誤失不共佛法。

四、意業常居善

偈頌明示修行者應「意業常居善,曾無樂諸惡,恒觀察法性,恭敬住慈心」,並由此恭敬聽法、速悟大菩提。

五、純淨佛土之意業

因陀幢如來佛土中,邪定、增上慢眾生一向皆無,「不淨身業、不淨口業、不淨意業一切皆無」。彼佛土中一切眾生身口意三業皆「智上首、智順轉、演說開示正顯」,以善業迴向故,愚癡報不生,苦受、不苦不樂受皆無。

六、觀察意業天子之偈讚

「觀察意業天子」以偈讚佛:一者云「眾生心所緣,意業所起作,種種智慧生,世尊悉知彼」;二者云「意業是佛地,愍觀眾生故,方便智清淨,佛智無體性」。經中將意業提升至佛地之高度,認為意業本乎愍觀眾生、方便智清淨故。

七、意業不護之過患

彌勒菩薩啟請觀察「憒閙中過」,佛列舉二十種過患,第一至第三即「不護身業」「不護語業」「不護意業」,為樂於憒閙之過。

【術語說明】本經論及意業時,「意業」與「心業」二名並用:舍利子啟請之文、觀察意業天子偈讚、彌勒品、因陀幢如來佛土之說用「意業」;如來遍教行智品、如來不共佛法品用「心業」,二者同指由心意造作之善惡業。

Related