Dharma · AI Companion

貪欲蓋

kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa

贪着欲境而障碍禅定。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying (這個概念在說什麼)

In early Buddhist teachings, kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa (貪欲蓋 / Desire Hindrance)—often translated as sensual desire or craving as a hindrance—holds a critical position on the path to liberation (*mārga*, 解脫道). It is listed first among the "Five Hindrances" (五蓋 / *pañca nīvaraṇāni*), along with ill-will (瞋恚蓋 / *byāpāda*), sloth and torpor (睡眠蓋 / *thīna-middha*), restlessness and remorse (掉悔蓋 / *uddhacca-kukkucca*), and doubt (疑蓋 / *vicikicchā*).

The early texts recorded in the *Saṃyuktāgama* (雜阿含經) define kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa unequivocally as a "purely unwholesome collection" (純一不善聚 / *kevalaṃ akusalarāsi*). It is not merely an occasional fleeting thought, but a fundamental psychological obstruction that darkens the mind and inhibits spiritual growth.

1. Core Definition and Boundary

To understand kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa, one must distinguish its boundaries clearly: * **The Meaning of *Kāma-chanda***: *Kāma* refers to the five cords of sense pleasure—delight in sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and tangible objects—while *chanda* here denotes impulsive intention or longing. * **The Meaning of *Nīvaraṇa* (蓋 / Cover)**: The word *nīvaraṇa* literally means an obstacle, screen, or shroud. A hindrance does not alter the intrinsic luminosity of the mind; rather, it acts like a dense fog or heavy cloth draped over awareness.

The Canon summarizes the core damage of kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa in a precise formula: it "afflicts the mind and weakens wisdom" (煩惱於心,令智慧羸). It belongs to the category of "obstructions and barriers, lacking clarity and full awakening, failing to turn toward Nirvāṇa" (障閡之分,非明、非正覺,不轉趣涅槃). When sensual craving overwhelms the mind, the cognitive faculty loses its objectivity; the mind becomes sticky, biased, and incapable of perceiving reality as impermanent (無常 / *anicca*), unsatisfactory ( / *dukkha*), and non-self (無我 / *anattā*).

``` [ Attractive Sense Object ] │ ▼ [ Contact / 觸相 ] │ ▼ [ Improper Attention / 不正思惟 ] ───► Feeds / 貪欲蓋之食 │ ▼ [ kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa / 貪欲蓋 ] ───► Smothers Wholesome Mind / 蔭覆善心 ───► Weakens Wisdom / 令智慧羸 ```

2. The Internal Mechanism: The "Nutriment" () of Desire

The Buddha analyzed kāmacchanda not as an uncaused phenomenon, but as a conditioned process driven by specific "nutriments" ( / *āhāra*):

* Internal Cause — Object Contact (觸相) + Improper Attention (不正思惟): When sense faculties engage an attractive object (觸相 / *subha-nimitta*), if the mind responds with improper attention (不正思惟 / *ayoniśo manasikāra*)—focusing exclusively on the perceived beauty, permanence, or pleasure of the object—unisen craving arises, and already arisen craving grows exponentially (未生者令生,已生者能令增廣). * External Cause — Unwholesome Companionship (惡知識、惡伴黨): Surrounding oneself with friends or environments that glorify sensual indulgence acts as external fuel, feeding the habit pattern of craving.

Conversely, its antidote—the state of "non-nutriment" (無食)—relies on proper attention (正思惟 / *yoniśo manasikāra*) and association with noble friends (善知識). When one observes sense objects with wise contemplation (seeing their impermanence and conditional nature), unarisen craving does not arise, and existing craving fades away.

3. Canonical Metaphors: The "Mind-Tree" and Tinted Water

The canonical texts employ strict, specific metaphors to illustrate how kāmacchanda functions:

* The Metaphor of the "Mind-Tree" (五種心樹): In the *Saṃyuktāgama*, the five hindrances are compared to five types of seeds (such as the *kañcaya* tree seed) that are extraordinarily tiny when planted in the soil of the heart. Yet, as they grow, their trunks expand and their dense canopy overshadows all surrounding vegetation (蔭覆諸節), ultimately causing the host tree and good plants to wither and fall (令善心蔭覆墮臥). Desire begins as a tiny, almost imperceptible itch of interest; if fed by improper reflection, it grows into an overarching psychological canopy that smothers clarity, virtue, and peace. * The Metaphor of Dye-Tinted Water (染彩色水): In early discourses across the Agamas and Nikāyas, kāmacchanda is compared to a bowl of water mixed with bright dye pigments. If one looks into dyed water, one cannot see one's true reflection. Similarly, when the mind is colored by sensual craving, it cannot see things as they truly are. It is also compared to being in debt (負債): a person bound by sensual desire is constantly paying "interest" to temporary sensations, endlessly answering the demands of sensory creditors.

4. Its Position in the Path to Liberation (解脫道)

Within the architecture of liberation, kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa stands in direct opposition to the Seven Factors of Awakening (七覺支 / *bojjhaṅga*—mindfulness, investigation of phenomena, energy, joy, tranquility, concentration, and equanimity).

When a practitioner listens attentively to the True Dharma (側聽正法) and abandons the five hindrances (捨離五支), the mind becomes pliable, unified, and quiet. Only then can the Seven Factors of Awakening be cultivated to fulfillment. By abandoning kāmacchanda, one transforms the mind into a pure field of merit (世良福田), capable of yielding the ultimate fruit of Nirvāṇa.


Life Walkthrough (生活裡的走查)

To see how kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa operates in contemporary life, let us trace a ordinary, everyday scenario step-by-step using classical definitions.

Scenario: The Late-Night Smartphone Scroll

Imagine it is 11:30 PM. You are lying in bed, intending to sleep.

``` [ Classical Stage ] [ Contemporary Experience ] 1. 觸相 (Sense Contact) ───► Notification badge, sleek product ad, or social media image. 2. 不正思惟 (Improper Attention)─► "If I buy this / get likes, I will finally feel complete and happy." 3. 欲愛蓋之食 (Nutriment) ───► Replays, dopamine craving, obsessively refreshing screens. 4. 心樹增長 (Mind-Tree Growth)───► Mental fog, late-night restlessness, loss of mindfulness/sleep. 5. 正思惟 (Wise Attention) ───► "This is just a digital stimulus triggering a transient craving." ```

1. Sense Contact (觸相** / *subha-nimitta*): You glance at your phone screen. A notification red dot flashes, or an advertisement displays a sleek gadget, a travel destination, or a curated social media photo of someone’s ideal lifestyle. This visual impression is the raw sense contact (觸相**).

2. Improper Attention (不正思惟** / *ayoniśo manasikāra*): Instead of noting "a red dot on a screen" or "a colored image," your mind immediately clings to the attractive sign (取相**). You think: *"If I buy that item, my room will look aesthetic,"* or *"If I check this message, I will feel validated and connected."* You exaggerate the pleasure it promises, completely overlooking that it is temporary, conditional, and bound to leave you unsatisfied.

3. Feeding the Hindrance (欲愛蓋之食): This improper reflection acts directly as the "food" () for desire. Unarisen craving springs to life; existing craving expands (未生者令生,已生者能令增廣). You open the app, add items to a cart, or endlessly refresh the feed for social validation.

4. The Mind-Tree Takes Over (心樹增長,令善心蔭覆墮臥): Within twenty minutes, the tiny seed of curiosity has grown into a thick psychological canopy (心樹). Your mind is now agitated, sticky, and restless. The wholesome intention to rest, practice mindfulness, or maintain inner calm is completely smothered (令善心蔭覆墮臥). Wisdom is weakened (令智慧羸): if you try to meditate or reflect quietly right now, your mind is clouded, filled with lingering images and mental rehearsals.

5. External Fuel (惡知識、惡伴黨): If you enter a group chat where everyone is bragging about purchases, chasing trends, or seeking status, these external influences act as bad companions (惡知識), further solidifying the hindrance.

6. Applying the Antidote (正思惟 & 善知識): How do you cut off the fuel? You apply proper attention (正思惟). You pause and observe the craving directly: *"This feeling is just a surge of dopamine, an impermanent impulse triggered by digital pixels. Owning that item will not solve fundamental dissatisfaction."* Seeing the object's conditional and transient nature deprives the hindrance of food. Paired with noble guidance (善知識), the desire loses its hold, and mental clarity returns.

Common Mapping Errors in Modern Life

* Error 1: Restricting kāmacchanda to coarse sexual lust or overt gluttony. *Clarification*: Modern people often think desire only means severe addiction or sexual obsession. In Buddhist psychology, kāmacchanda includes subtle sensory craving—compulsively seeking aesthetic perfection, micro-doses of online novelty, audio-visual comfort, or environmental pleasantness. * Error 2: Mistaking the object for the hindrance itself. *Clarification*: The smartphone or the ad is simply the external sense object (觸相). The hindrance () is the internal psychological projection and compulsive grasping generated by improper reflection (不正思惟).


Why Contemporary People Need It (當代人為甚麼需要它)

1. Navigating the Algorithmic "Nutriment Economy"

Contemporary society operates largely on an attention economy explicitly engineered to generate kāmacchanda. Machine learning algorithms, social media notification loops, and personalized advertisements are dynamic system architectures designed to serve a continuous stream of attractive signs (觸相) to the human brain.

Without a clear diagnostic concept like kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa, modern individuals experience chronic psychological exhaustion, brain fog, and fragmented attention without understanding the cause. Early Buddhism identifies the precise mechanism: constantly feeding improper attention to sensory prompts clouds awareness and "weakens wisdom" (令智慧羸).

2. The Distinction Between Neuroscience and the Path to Liberation

Modern neuroscience explains sensory craving through dopamine pathways and reward-prediction errors. While neuroscience offers a structural description of brain mechanisms, it has clear limitations: * Descriptive vs. Transformative: Neuroscience maps where and how dopamine fires, but it does not offer an internal ethical framework or an active contemplative discipline to free the mind from compulsiveness. * Brain vs. Liberation: Scientific research views dopamine loops as natural evolutionary survival tools. Early Buddhism, however, evaluates these habits through the lens of liberation (*mārga*): kāmacchanda keeps the mind tied to cyclic suffering (生死輪迴) and obstructs ultimate peace (涅槃).

Recognizing kāmacchanda as a "hindrance" allows modern individuals to see that mental restlessness is not an unchangeable personality trait, but a temporary psychological cover () that can be dismantled through wise reflection (正思惟).


Common Misreadings and Clarifications (常見誤讀與澄清)

Misreading 1: "All desires are kāmacchanda; therefore, Buddhism demands eliminating all motivation."

Clarification: Early Buddhism strictly distinguishes between kāmacchanda (sensual craving hindrance) and chanda (wholesome intention or desire / *dhammachanda*). * *Kāmacchanda* is purely unwholesome (純一不善聚) because it is rooted in delusion and sensory grasping that darkens wisdom. * *Dhammachanda* (法欲 / desire for truth, virtue, and liberation) is a necessary engine on the path. The aspiration to practice morality, cultivate mindfulness, help others, and attain Nirvāṇa relies on wholesome *chanda*. Removing kāmacchanda does not leave a person passive; it frees mental energy so wholesome intentions can flourish.

Misreading 2: "Overcoming kāmacchanda requires hating or suppressing sensory objects."

Clarification: The goal of Buddhist practice is not aversion or ascetic self-mortification. Aversion toward sense objects is simply falling into the second hindrance—ill-will (瞋恚蓋). The early texts emphasize that sense objects themselves are neutrally conditioned phenomena. The hindrance arises solely from improper attention (不正思惟). Overcoming kāmacchanda means seeing sense objects clearly as they are—impermanent, ungraspable, and lacking inherent selfhood—thereby relinquishing compulsive attachment without hatred or suppression.

Misreading 3: "Kāmacchanda is only a minor concern during formal meditation."

Clarification: While kāmacchanda explicitly hinders meditative absorption (*jhāna*) and insight (*vipassanā*) on the cushion, the Agamas make clear that its roots run deep in everyday life. Left unchecked in daily activities, the seed of kāmacchanda grows continuously into a dense forest (心樹). Cultivating proper reflection (正思惟) and noble friendship (善知識) in daily life is the essential foundation for removing the shroud, restoring the mind's natural clarity, and making progress toward liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义 在《杂阿含经》中,“贪欲盖”(梵语:kāmacchanda-nīvaraṇa)是修行者在追求解脱道路上必须克服的首要且关键的烦恼之一。经中将其定性为“不善聚”或“纯一不善聚”,意指其本质是完全不善的、纯粹的染污。贪欲盖与瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑盖并称为“五障、五盖”、“五法” 或“五支”。 其核心危害在于“覆”与“盖”的遮蔽作用。经中指出,贪欲盖等五盖能够“烦恼于心,令智慧羸”,它们属于“障阂之分,非明、非正觉,不转趣涅槃”。这意味着贪欲盖会使修行者的心灵陷入烦恼与混乱,削弱智慧的力量,成为解脱路上的障碍,使人无法获得清明的智慧与真正的觉悟,更无法转向涅槃的彼岸。在相关的偈颂中,进一步强调了贪欲盖等五盖会“增长诸烦恼”,其势力深着而难以度越,从而“障蔽于众生,令不见正道”,使众生在生死轮回中迷失方向。

2. 主要阐述 《杂阿含经》对贪欲盖的生起因缘、增长条件以及如何对治与断除进行了系统而深入的阐述。 首先,关于贪欲盖的生起与增长,经中引入了“食”的比喻。如同身体需要食物来维持和增长一样,烦恼的生起与扩大也有其赖以生存的“食”。贪欲盖的“食”主要包括内在与外在两个维度: 在内在因缘方面,其“食”为“触相”以及对此产生的“不正思惟”。当修行者接触到可爱乐的境界(即“触相”)时,若缺乏正念,产生了“不正思惟”,未起的贪欲盖就会因此而生起,而已起的贪欲盖则会获得滋养,进一步重生并令其增广。 在外在因缘方面,亲近“恶知识、恶伴党”也是贪欲盖的重要来源。若与恶知识相交往,会引导修行者走向错误的方向,导致未生的贪欲盖生起,已生者重生增广。 其次,关于贪欲盖的对治与断除,经中同样从内外两个维度给出了相应的“无食”方法: 在内在对治上,“正思惟”是断除贪欲盖的关键。若修行者能够在面对境界时保持“正思惟”,则未起的贪欲盖就不会生起,而已起的贪欲盖则会失去滋养,从而得以灭除或断除。 在外在对治上,亲近“善知识、善伴党、善随从者”具有决定性的作用。善知识的引导能帮助修行者保持正念,使未起之贪欲盖不生,已起者令断。 此外,听闻正法与实际修持是断除贪欲盖的具体实践路径。比丘若能在听法时“专一其心,侧听正法”,便能有效断除包括贪欲盖在内的五法,并在此基础上修习七觉支,令其圆满具足。 最后,经中强调了舍离贪欲盖的巨大功德。若沙门、婆罗门能够断除、已知贪欲盖等五盖(即“舍离五支”),并成就无漏的五支,这就是建立了世间最清净的福田,众生若对他们进行布施,将会获得极大的福利与大果报。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在《杂阿含经》的文本中,虽然该概念的核心内涵保持一致,但在不同的语境和论述中,存在着多种术语形式与用词特点。 最常用且最标准的术语是“贪欲盖”。然而,在具体论述其生起因缘(即“食”)的段落中,经文在总结时使用了“欲爱盖”这一术语形式,明确指出“是名欲爱盖之食”。在这里,“欲爱盖”与“贪欲盖”具有完全等同的含义,展示了译者在用词上的多样性。 此外,当贪欲盖与其他四种覆盖心灵的烦恼合称时,经文中除了最常见的“五盖”之外,还根据不同的论述侧重点,使用了多种不同的合称: - 侧重其障碍解脱的性质时,称为“五障”; - 侧重其作为修行中应断除的法类时,称为“五法”; - 侧重其在心中生长、遮蔽善心的生动比喻时,称为“五种心树”; - 侧重其纯粹不善的本质时,合称为“不善聚”; - 侧重其作为应舍离的烦恼分支时,称为“五支”。

4. 与相关概念的关系 贪欲盖并非孤立存在,它与经中的其他核心佛学概念有着密切的关联: - 与“五盖”及其他四盖的关系:贪欲盖是五盖的首要成员。它与瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑盖共同构成了阻碍修行、覆盖心灵的五种主要烦恼。这五者在性质上相通,皆能“烦恼于心,令智慧羸”,在修行中必须一并予以断除。 - 与“七觉支”的关系:贪欲盖等五法与七觉支(念、择法、精进、喜、轻安、定、舍)处于直接对立的关系。经中指出,只有断除了贪欲盖等五法,修行者才能专心修习七觉支,并最终令七觉支满足。七觉支的修习是断除贪欲盖的结果,也是防止其复发的保障。 - 与“心树”的比喻关系:经中将贪欲盖等五盖比喻为“五种心树”(如同揵遮耶树等五种种子至微而生长巨大的树木)。贪欲盖等在心中“渐渐增长”,其种子虽然极其微细,但长大后却能“荫覆诸节”,最终“令善心荫覆堕卧”。这一比喻生动地揭示了贪欲盖从小到大、逐渐遮蔽和压制修行者善心的危险过程。

5. 代表性原文引用 - 关于五盖的危害与性质: “有五障、五盖,烦恼于心,令智慧羸,障阂之分,非明、非正觉,不转趣涅槃。何等为五?谓贪欲盖、瞋恚盖、睡眠盖、掉悔盖、疑盖。” - 关于贪欲盖之“食”: “何等为贪欲盖食?谓触相,于彼不正思惟,未生贪欲盖令生,已生贪欲盖能令增广,是名欲爱盖之食。” - 关于“心树”的比喻: “有五种心树,非金、非银、非真珠、非摩尼、非琉璃、非璧玉、非石、非木,而在心中渐渐增长。何等为五?谓贪欲盖、瞋恚盖、睡眠盖、掉悔盖、疑盖。……如是,此五盖在于心中,渐渐增长,令善心荫覆堕卧。” - 关于听法断五法修七觉支: “若比丘专一其心,侧听正法,彼于尔时断五法,修习七觉支,令其满足。何等为断五法?谓断贪欲盖、瞋恚盖、睡眠盖、掉悔盖、疑盖,是名断五法。” - 关于舍离五支的功德: “若沙门、婆罗门舍离五支,成就五支,为世良福田,施彼得大福利、大果报。何等为舍离五支?谓舍离贪欲盖、瞋恚盖、睡眠盖、掉悔盖、疑盖。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本經論述「貪欲蓋」之要點如下:

一、概念定位與術語

《雜阿含經》中,貪欲蓋與瞋恚蓋、睡眠蓋、掉悔蓋、疑蓋並稱為「五蓋」,屬「不善聚」之純一品類,與「善法聚」之八聖道相對。經中以「蓋」為喻,稱其「為覆為蓋,煩惱於心,令智慧羸,為障閡分,非明、非等覺,不轉趣涅槃」,明確指出貪欲蓋具有覆蓋心性、削弱智慧、障礙趣向涅槃之作用。「蓋」字兼含覆蓋、障閡二義,與七覺支之「非翳非蓋」恰成對比。

二、與思惟之關係

經中反覆以「正思惟」與「不正思惟」為樞紐,說明貪欲蓋之生滅:不正思惟時,未起之貪欲蓋則起,已起者重生令增廣;正思惟時,未起之貪欲蓋不起,已起者令斷、令滅。此段經文特別標示此乃「於內法中」所不見之一法,強調內在思惟為貪欲蓋生滅之關鍵。

三、與外緣之關係

除內在思惟外,經中亦以「於外法中」說明外緣之影響:惡知識、惡伴黨能使未生之貪欲蓋令生、已生者增廣;反之,善知識、善伴黨、善隨從者能使未生之貪欲蓋不生、已生者令斷。此顯示貪欲蓋之起滅繫於內外二緣。

四、五樹為喻

經中以五種大樹為喻——揵遮耶樹、迦捭多羅樹、阿濕波他樹、優曇鉢羅樹、尼拘留他樹——種子雖微而漸漸長大,蔭覆諸節,令善心「蔭覆墮臥」。貪欲蓋即此五種心樹之一,其增長能令善心蔭覆墮臥。此喻突出貪欲蓋之漸長性與遮蔽善心之特質。

五、與七覺支之對治

經中將貪欲蓋等五蓋與七覺支對舉:五蓋為覆為蓋,障閡涅槃;七覺支非覆非蓋,增長智慧,轉趣涅槃。修習七覺支能令貪欲蓋等斷除,多修習已,轉成不退。專一其心、側聽正法之比丘,能斷五法、修習七法,令其轉進滿足。

六、捨離之果

波斯匿王問施處之語境下,佛說沙門婆羅門「捨離五支」,貪欲蓋居其首,「已斷已知」即名捨離;成就五支、建立福田,施此田者得大果報。此處「捨離五支」之說,表明貪欲蓋之斷除為建立福田、得大果報之先決條件。

術語特點:經中主要使用「貪欲蓋」一詞,與瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑蓋合稱「五蓋」,亦稱「五障」、「不善聚」;七覺支又稱「七覺分」或「七法」,八聖道又稱「善法聚」。本經未見其他異稱。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

本經《增壹阿含經》以「不善之聚」一語總攝五蓋,將「貪欲蓋」置於五蓋之首,明確指出此五法為一切不善法生起之根本。

一、總標「不善之聚」與五蓋之構成 世尊於舍衛國祇樹給孤獨園告諸比丘,宣說「不善之聚」即「五蓋」。經文明列五蓋為:貪欲蓋、瞋恚蓋、睡眠蓋、調戲蓋、疑蓋。此處所用名相值得留意:本經以「調戲」一詞稱第三蓋,以「睡眠」一詞稱第二蓋,皆與他處經典常見之譯名有別(如他經或作「掉舉」「掉悔」與「惛沉」「瞌睡」等),乃此經獨特譯法,須據此經記錄之。

二、貪欲蓋居首與「不善聚」之義 經文以「所謂五蓋……貪欲蓋、瞋恚蓋、睡眠蓋、調戲蓋、疑蓋,是謂名為五蓋。欲知不善聚者,此名為五蓋」的句式,將五蓋等同於「不善之聚」,並以「貪欲蓋」列為首位,凸顯其在五蓋中之優先性。此一排列方式顯示本經將貪欲視為煩惱與障禪之根本發端。

三、五蓋為惡趣之因 經文接言:「比丘當知,若有此五蓋,便有畜生、餓鬼、地獄之分,諸不善法皆由此起。」此處將五蓋(首即貪欲蓋)直接連結至三惡趣之果報,並聲明一切不善法皆由此五蓋生起。此一因果陳述,為本經對貪欲蓋乃至五蓋之核心定位:其不僅障礙禪定,更為輪迴惡道之根源。

四、以滅為要之修學勸勉 經末世尊勸諸比丘:「當求方便,滅貪欲蓋、瞋恚蓋、睡眠蓋、調戲蓋、疑蓋。如是,諸比丘!當作是學。」此勸勉以「滅」字為核心動詞,顯示本經對治五蓋之立場——非暫伏、乃求滅盡。對首位的貪欲蓋而言,亦不例外。

五、結語:經文體例與教說重心 本經此段以「不善之聚」統攝五蓋,將貪欲蓋列為五蓋之首,並以「有五蓋便有畜生、餓鬼、地獄之分」及「諸不善法皆由此起」二句,奠定其障禪、招惡之雙重過患。修學上則以「求方便滅」為唯一勸導,層次簡明而義旨清晰。經末「諸比丘聞佛所說,歡喜奉行」,可知此段乃世尊對在座比丘之直接教授。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》以「貪欲蓋」為五蓋之首,與瞋恚蓋、惛沈睡眠蓋、掉舉惡作蓋、疑蓋並列。論中將此五蓋定位為「於諸靜慮、等至障中」能為障礙之法,將證彼時即起遮障。

關於貪欲的體相,論云:「貪欲者,謂於妙五欲隨逐淨相,欲見、欲聞,乃至欲觸;或隨憶念先所領受,尋伺追戀」,即對五妙欲清淨相之隨逐,以及對曾受用境界的憶念追戀。又將貪欲蓋納入「拘礙」之列,與顧戀其身、樂相雜住、闕隨順教、得微少善便生喜足等共成五拘礙。

論中詳辨貪欲蓋之「食」與「非食」:食為「淨妙相,及於彼相不正思惟多所修習」;非食為「不淨相,及於彼相如理作意多所修習」。所謂淨妙相具體指女身八處可愛淨相——歌、舞、笑、睇、美容、進止、妙觸、就禮,由此令貪欲未生令生、生已增長;非食則觀青瘀等不淨,如理作意遮令不生,多所修習則生已能斷。

於菩薩戒中明言:「若諸菩薩安住菩薩淨戒律儀,起貪欲蓋,忍受不捨,是名有犯,有所違越,是染違犯」;無違犯者乃為斷彼生起樂欲發勤精進,而煩惱猛利蔽抑心故時時現行者。

論中亦從「違背五處」建立五蓋差別:「為在家諸欲境界所漂淪故,違背聖教,立貪欲蓋」;餘四蓋分別違背可愛樂法、奢摩他、毘鉢舍那、法論議無倒決擇之涅槃勝解。

與蓋相關者,論又於四取中以「欲愛為緣」建立「欲取」;於等持相違之五厚重過失中列「欲貪」,謂懷貪故多諸愛染,於身財等深生顧戀,由此於外五妙欲中多生散亂,能障三摩地;於七種雜染中,由不正隨念、境界現前等因緣,令貪愛展轉增盛,追戀過去、悕求未來、耽著現在,使身心周遍熱惱;於貪欲之妄分別中,廣列引發分別、覺悟分別、合結分別、有相分別、親昵分別、喜樂分別、侵逼分別、極親昵分別等八種,皆為論中辨析貪欲蓋之相關面相。

Related