Dharma · AI Companion

二乘

dviyāna

声闻乘与缘觉乘的合称。AI-generated

Type FrameworkDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span ultimately points to IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

无初立层(声闻/缘觉二乘的合称,属乘位判教语汇,本身不承载见地命题);究竟第四重〔法华一乘:二乘唯是佛方便施设,开三显一后究竟无二乘,此判摄本身即第四重了义论域〕〔唯识五性各别:定性二乘不回心,二乘果为实有终点〕。两系立场并列不裁决。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Imagine the Buddhist path of liberation not as a single, straight highway, but as a vast, complex ecosystem of awakening. To navigate this landscape, we must understand a crucial concept: 二乘 (Èr Chéng), or the Two Vehicles.

If you have ever felt utterly exhausted by the world and yearned to just disappear into a quiet cabin in the woods, you have touched the psychological edges of what the Two Vehicles represent. But in the grand architecture of Mahāyāna (Great Vehicle) Buddhism, this urge to escape—while profoundly valid and incredibly difficult to achieve—is not the final destination.

Let us walk through this concept, unpack its profound mechanics, and see where it fits into the ultimate map of liberation.

这个概念在说什么 (What is this concept talking about)

The term 二乘 (Èr Chéng - The Two Vehicles) is a collective name for two specific stages or paths of practice: the 声闻乘 (Shēngwén Chéng - Śrāvakayāna / Voice-Hearer Vehicle) and the 缘觉乘 (Yuánjué Chéng - Pratyekabuddhayāna / Solitary Realizer Vehicle), the latter also being known as 独觉 (Dújué - Solitary Awakened) or 辟支佛 (Pìzhīfó - Paccekabuddha).

According to the Mahāyāna sutras, the Buddha taught these two paths as an expedient means (方便) tailored for beings of specific capacities. Both vehicles aim at personal liberation from the cycle of birth and death (Samsara), but they differ in their methods and are ultimately viewed by the Mahāyāna tradition as incomplete, or "non-ultimate."

1. 声闻乘 (Śrāvakayāna - The Voice-Hearer): The Soft-Root Liberation This path is classified as "soft-root liberation" (软根解脱). Why? Because the practitioner cannot figure it out on their own; they must "hear the Dharma from others" (从他闻法) or awaken by "following others' words" (随他语解). Their wisdom is considered relatively narrow. Their defining characteristic is a profound, almost terrifying realization of the suffering in the world. The classical texts use highly specific, structural metaphors to describe how they view existence (notably using the older translation terms 阴/界/入 from the *Mahāsamnipāta Sūtra*): * 阴如怨 (Yīn rú yuàn) / Skandhas as enemies: They view their own five aggregates (form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) not as "self," but as enemies constantly plotting to trap them in suffering. * 界如毒蛇 (Jiè rú dú shé) / Dhatus as poisonous snakes: The eighteen elements (the collision of sense organs, objects, and consciousnesses) are seen as deadly, venomous snakes—one wrong touch brings fatal affliction. * 入如空聚 (Rù rú kōng jù) / Ayatanas as empty villages: The twelve sense bases are like abandoned, desolate villages, completely empty of a true self but haunted by illusions. Because of this stark vision, their urgency to escape the "cave of the three realms" (三有窟宅) is absolute. The sutras describe them as practicing "like saving one's head from burning" (如救头燃). They want nothing more than to shoot the arrow of wisdom directly at the Four Noble Truths (欲以智箭射向四谛) and enter the absolute silence of Nirvāṇa.

2. 缘觉乘 (Pratyekabuddhayāna - The Solitary Realizer): The Medium-Root Liberation This path is a step up in capacity, known as "medium-root liberation" (中根解脱). Their merit surpasses the Voice-Hearers. Their defining trait is that they awaken "without a teacher" (悟不由师). They rarely hear the Dharma or make offerings to Buddhas (少闻少供养诸佛). Instead, they love solitude, dwelling far away in empty, quiet places (乐独远离). They achieve liberation naturally by "skillfully analyzing the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination" (方便分别十二因缘)—observing the natural cycles of cause and effect, how ignorance leads to action, action to consciousness, and ultimately to suffering and death.

The Limitation: The "Great Deep Pit" Despite their immense holiness—they have eradicated personal afflictions and share high states of Dhyāna (meditative absorption) with the Buddha—the Mahāyāna sutras categorize the Two Vehicles as having a "narrow and inferior aspiration" (心志狭劣). They lack the "transcendental supreme truth wisdom" (出世第一义智). They cannot receive the Buddha's vast Dharma rain, nor can they even perceive the Buddha's ultimate majestic manifestations. The sutras use striking metaphors for their limitation: the Two Vehicles are like a "great deep pit hundreds of thousands of cubits deep" (深百千肘的大深坑), or like "inferior beings hoping for liberation but remaining motionless in a swamp" (下劣众生悕望欲解于泽不动者). They have found a quiet, unconditioned space (无为), but they are stuck there, entirely lacking the Bodhicitta (菩提心 - the mind of awakening for the sake of all beings) that defines a Bodhisattva.


生活里的走查 (Life Walkthrough)

To truly grasp this, let's map these exact definitions onto a familiar contemporary journey: the burnout and awakening of a modern city dweller.

Phase 1: The Śrāvaka (Voice-Hearer) Awakening You are exhausted by your corporate job, endless algorithmic notifications, and toxic social dynamics. One day, you listen to a podcast or read a profound book by a spiritual teacher (this is *从他闻法* - hearing from others). Suddenly, the illusion shatters. You look at your life through the exact classical lenses: * *Skandhas as enemies (阴如怨):* You realize your own body's fatigue and your mind's constant anxiety (your aggregates) are sabotaging your peace. They are hostile forces. * *Ayatanas as empty villages (入如空聚):* You look at the glowing screens, the bustling office, the bustling streets (the sense bases), and realize there is no soul here. It’s just an empty, desolate simulation. * *Dhatus as poisonous snakes (界如毒蛇):* You realize that every time your eyes meet an angry email, or your ears hear office gossip (the collision of organ, object, and consciousness), it injects venom into your nervous system. Your reaction is immediate and desperate. You feel an intense, overwhelming urge to resign, delete all social media, and escape. The urgency is literal: you feel you must get out *right now*, as if your hair were on fire (*如救头燃*).

Phase 2: The Pratyekabuddha (Solitary Realizer) Awakening You move to a remote cabin off the grid. You stop listening to podcasts or gurus (*悟不由师* - awakening without a teacher). You embrace complete solitude (*乐独远离*). Sitting by the woods, you watch the seasons change and observe your own mind. You naturally reverse-engineer how your past suffering happened: "Because I wanted status, I took the job; because I took the job, I lost my sleep; because I lost my sleep, I suffered." You have just masterfully analyzed the chains of cause and effect (*方便分别十二因缘*). You find perfect, unshakeable inner peace.

The Contemporary Mapping Error (The Trap): Here is where modern pop-spirituality usually stops. We look at this off-grid hermit and say, "Wow, they reached the ultimate enlightenment." But the Mahāyāna texts warn us: You have just fallen into the Great Deep Pit (大深坑). You have protected yourself, but you are "motionless in the swamp" (于泽不动). If you stay in this cabin, completely disconnected from the world's immense suffering, refusing to help others because it might disturb your peace, your capacity has become "narrow and inferior" (心志狭劣). You have achieved personal cessation, but you have fundamentally failed to generate Bodhicitta—the vast, courageous heart that returns to the burning city to help others.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why contemporary people need it)

Contemporary readers need the concept of the Two Vehicles because it perfectly names both the necessity and the danger of the "spiritual withdrawal" phase.

In an era of hyper-connectivity, where our nervous systems are hijacked by algorithmic feeds and systemic pressures, the urge of the Two Vehicles is a deeply sane, necessary biological and spiritual reflex. We *need* to see the toxic inputs as poisonous snakes; we *need* the urgency of putting out the fire on our heads to establish boundaries. This is why the Buddha taught it. It is a powerful, valid foundation.

However, we also desperately need the Mahāyāna critique of the Two Vehicles. Today, we often see a "spiritual bypass" where people use mindfulness and detachment merely to anesthetize themselves against the world's problems. If meditation just makes you a highly calm, detached observer who feels no responsibility for the collective suffering around you, you are trapped in the "pit of the unconditioned."

The Mahāyāna tradition insists that true awakening requires integration, not just escape. A Bodhisattva’s Bodhicitta shines like a monarch (如君主) and outshines the Two Vehicles because a Bodhisattva experiences the exact same terrifying world, yet vows: *Even if I must suffer in the lower realms, I will not seek the personal escape of the Two Vehicles (心不求声闻缘觉乘)*. They return to the messy, entangled world with supreme compassion.


常见误读与澄清 (Common misreadings and clarifications)

Misreading 1: "The Two Vehicles are bad, failed practitioners." *Clarification:* Not at all. Arhats (the fruit of the Śrāvakayāna) and Pratyekabuddhas are revered sages who have entirely conquered greed, anger, and ignorance. The sutras explicitly state that they share profound states of Dhyāna (meditative absorption) with the Buddha, all the way up to the Formless Realms and the Cessation of Feeling and Perception (灭受想定). The critique is not that they are evil, but that their path is *incomplete*. They are in a state of suspended animation, lacking the ultimate, non-dual wisdom of a Buddha.

Misreading 2: Compressing the metaphors into "they just think life is suffering." *Clarification:* We must not flatten the classical definitions. When the text says "Skandhas as enemies, Dhatus as snakes, Ayatanas as empty villages," it is providing a highly technical, precise psychological diagnostic. It means they have deconstructed the human experience into its component parts (aggregates, elements, sense bases) and realized that *none* of these components contain a permanent self, and *all* of them are sources of friction. It is an advanced analytical achievement, not mere pessimism.

Misreading 3: Believing the Two Vehicles and the Great Vehicle are forever separate. *Clarification:* From the perspective of absolute truth, there is no eternal division. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (大宝积经) reveals the ultimate secret: "In the supreme truth, there are no Two Vehicles... the Two Vehicles all enter the One Vehicle" (以第一义无有二乘,二乘者同入一乘). The Buddha manifested the Two Vehicles merely as a skillful teaching tool (方便) based on the "knowledge of beings' faculties" (诸根智). Sometimes, Bodhisattvas will even intentionally manifest as Voice-Hearers or Solitary Realizers (示入声闻、辟支佛地) to guide people who are too overwhelmed to hear the vast Mahāyāna teachings yet. Ultimately, the quiet cabin in the woods is not a dead end; it is simply a waystation where the exhausted traveler rests before discovering they have the heart to save the world.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

二乘(梵语:dvi-yāna)是佛教中对“声闻乘”与“缘觉乘”(亦称独觉乘、辟支佛乘)的合称。在诸大乘经典中,二乘被界定为根据众生根器而施设的修行阶位。其中,声闻乘属于“软根解脱”,修行者需“从他闻法”或“随他语解”方能悟道;缘觉乘则属于“中根解脱”,修行者“悟不由师”,通过独自思惟十二因缘而获得觉悟。大乘经普遍认为,二乘在智慧、器量及断惑上具有根本的局限性,属于志向狭劣、非究竟的解脱,而超越二乘之上的胜道则被称为“大乘”或“一乘”。


二、主要阐述

1. 二乘的修行特征与根器差别

根据经典论述,二乘在根器、修行方法及心理特征上存在明显差异: * 声闻乘:属于“软根解脱”。其核心特征是必须“从他闻法”以产生正见,随顺他人的言教而得解悟,智慧相对狭劣。声闻修行者极度怖畏生死受生,心常厌离三界,视“阴如怨、界如毒蛇、入如空聚”。他们精进修行“如救头燃”,于一念中求离三有窟宅,乐欲出世并证得寂灭涅槃。若未能深解四圣谛,则欲以智箭射向四谛。 * 缘觉乘(独觉、辟支佛):属于“中根解脱”。其功德超越声闻,虽然少闻法且少供养诸佛,但乐于远离憒闹、独住空闲。他们“悟不由师”,不从他闻,而是通过“方便分别十二因缘”自然觉了,因缘悟道,故名缘觉或独觉。

2. 二乘的局限性与非究竟性

大乘经典从多个维度剖析了二乘的局限,指出其并非究竟的佛道: * 智慧与断惑的局限:二乘虽初证圣谛,但“非以一智断诸住地,亦非一智证四遍知”,他们缺乏“出世第一义智”,其所证境界并非如来境界。 * 器量与受法局限:如来降下的广大法雨,因“二乘心志狭劣”而不能受持,唯有大菩萨能受持。如来智慧大药王树虽能利益广大众生,但对“二乘堕于无为广大深阬”者则无法起到生长的利益。此外,大乘不思議大威德法门不入二乘之手,二乘之人甚至不得听闻。在逝多林中,舍利弗、目犍连等大声闻弟子,因本不修习见佛自在善根、不发菩提心,故对如来的神力神变及菩萨的庄严境界“皆悉不见”。 * 形象的比喻:经中将二乘比喻为“下劣众生悕望欲解于泽不动者”,将二乘乘比喻为狭窄通道左右“深百千肘”的“大深坑”。如来微笑之光若在膝或肩部收没,亦象征着二乘人的局限。

3. 菩萨对二乘的态度与超越

菩萨在修行过程中,对二乘持远离、不求、不赞叹的态度,并在功德上全面超越二乘: * 远离与不求:菩萨即使身处地狱、饿鬼等恶道受极重苦,也“心不求声闻缘觉乘,亦无心求自得解脫”。大乘殊胜道“非诸二乘等,于此能发趣”。修行者应“远二乘见”,不赞叹二乘,赞说二乘被列为恶友的特征。文殊师利菩萨自言“于烦恼及以二乘都无所爱”,德增天子亦发愿“终不愿求于二乘”。 * 功德的超越:菩萨始求佛道的一念菩提心,其功德即非二乘所能了知。菩提心如君主,胜出一切二乘;如帝青宝,出过二乘智慧;能映蔽一切凡夫与二乘功德。初发心菩萨的大悲功德与愿力,是二乘修行百千劫所不能及的,因此二乘耆旧皆应敬礼初发心菩萨。 * 阶位的超越:菩萨在行施舍时,回向愿一切众生“离二乘愿”。在第七地(远行地),菩萨以自智力修行,出过一切二乘之上;第八地境界亦非声闻独觉所知。在修行障门中,“随顺二乘正位”被列为重大障碍。

4. 菩萨对二乘的方便示现

尽管菩萨超越二乘,但能以方便力示现二乘。菩萨能“示入声闻、辟支佛地”而不作证灭;虽示现一切声闻、独觉寂静威仪,但内心不于二乘取出离之相;亦能随顺众生心乐,示现二乘等一切乘道来化导群生。


三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类的经典中,关于二乘的术语和法相表述存在细微差异: 1. 合称与分称的差异: * 《大宝积经》中,二乘被明确合称为“声闻乘”与“缘觉乘”(或“辟支佛乘”、“独觉乘”)。 * 《大方等大集经》中,主要使用“声闻乘”与“缘觉乘”(亦称“辟支佛”),并提及特指的“佉伽毘沙拏劫辟支佛”。 * 《大方广佛华严经》(唐译本)中,合称为“声闻乘”与“独觉乘”,亦常将“声闻”与“独觉”、“缘觉” 或“辟支佛” 并列或互换提及。 2. 核心法相的译词特征: * 《大方等大集经》具有独特的译词风格,以“阴”指代“蕴”(如“观阴如怨”、“不依阴入定”),以“入”指代“处”或“十二处”(如“入如空聚”、“不依入入定”)。而《大宝积经》与《大方广佛华严经》则多采用常规的“蕴”、“处”等法相表述。


四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与大乘、一乘的关系

二乘是相对于大乘、一乘而施设的方便。如来凭借“诸根智”,根据众生根器实施方便教化,如对住大乘根者说大乘,对住下劣根者说二乘。然而,从第一义谛来看,“以第一义无有二乘,二乘者同入一乘,一乘者即胜义乘”,如来随顺众生所欲而方便说的二乘,其实质“即是大乘”。

2. 与菩萨、如来禅定的共与不共关系

根据《大方等大集经》的系统阐述,二乘与菩萨、如来的禅定境界存在“共与不共”的关系: * 菩萨定不共二乘:菩萨修定的心寂灭,其十六事修行禅定“不与声闻辟支佛共”,且能“过于二乘学无学智”。 * 声闻缘觉如来共禅:初禅至第四禅、四无色定及灭受想定,为声闻、缘觉与如来所共。依此定可得三十七道品、三解脱门等,但不能得到菩萨的四摄事、四梵住、十力及一切智智。 * 缘觉如来共、不共声闻禅:思惟求因缘法,入三行灭无余第一义灭定,或得不可说三昧,此禅为缘觉与如来共,而不与声闻共。 * 如来禅不共二乘:如来第一义禅不依阴、界、入,无所依亦不依所依,此超绝境界完全不共于二乘。


五、代表性原文引用

1. 《大寶積經》:“以第一義無有二乘,二乘者同入一乘,一乘者即勝義乘。” 2. 《大方等大集經》:“聲聞乘者從他聞法……緣覺乘者少聞少供養諸佛,樂獨遠離,不從他聞,觀十二緣自然覺了。” 3. 《大方廣佛華嚴經》:“聲聞乘者,隨他語解,智慧狹劣;獨覺乘者,悟不由師……過二乘位,名為大乘。” 4. 《大方廣佛華嚴經》:“菩提心者,如君主,勝出一切二乘人故。”

By SutraAI-generated

大方廣佛華嚴經(八十華嚴)T0279 · 華嚴部

《大方廣佛華嚴經(八十華嚴)》以「二乘」合稱聲聞乘與緣覺乘,並交替使用「聲聞、緣覺」「聲聞、獨覺」,又以「辟支佛」指緣覺;如述菩薩示入二乘地時稱「聲聞、辟支佛地」,述初發心超勝時則稱「聲聞、獨覺」。這些是本經記述同一組對象時的主要用詞形式。 本經多從菩薩道與佛智的廣大境界對照二乘。初發菩提心及其功德,世間眾生與二乘尚不能知;菩薩從初地起因志求佛法而已超過聲聞、獨覺,至第七地則由自身所行智慧之力,明確「出過一切二乘之上」,其智慧、善根及方便行皆非二乘所能及。 此種差別尤集中表現在菩提心。經中說菩提心如君主,「勝出一切二乘人」;如帝青寶,超過世間二乘之智;又以寶珠、天冠、金剛、師子乳及迦陵頻伽鳥等譬喻,反覆申明凡夫、二乘功德不能映蔽或企及菩提心,二乘之心不能破壞菩提心,聲聞、緣覺久修道行亦不及初發心菩薩的大悲、願智與勇猛。菩薩因菩提心而不住二乘解脫,且為耆宿聲聞、緣覺所尊重。 在法門承受與境界知見方面,本經說如來出現之大法雨,二乘因「心志狹劣」不能受持;如來法雨乃至一文一句的深廣作用,也非聲聞、獨覺所能測知。如來智慧大藥王樹於「二乘墮於無為廣大深阬」之處不能作生長利益,然而如來於彼亦無厭捨。又說此經所示祕密法門唯為趣向大乘、乘不思議乘的菩薩而說,「一切二乘不聞此經」,故不能受持、讀誦、書寫及解說。 逝多林一段更具體描述聲聞境界的限度:舍利弗等大聲聞雖在會中,卻不能見如來神力、莊嚴、淨剎及普賢菩薩眾會等境界,原因列為往昔未修相關善根、未發無上菩提心及未修菩薩大願等;此境界「不與一切二乘所共」,亦「非是一切二乘境界」,並以「非其器故」總結其不能知見。 本經同時並不把二乘僅作排斥對象。菩薩布施時,聲聞、緣覺同列福田;菩薩以願力與方便,能示入聲聞、辟支佛地,亦能普示一切乘道,並為眾生宣說天道、二乘乃至如來一切智。然而菩薩自身則「離二乘願」,不取二乘少分出離之相,而以圓滿平等大乘及一切智為所趣。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》以「二乘」合稱聲聞乘與緣覺乘,亦交替使用「聲聞緣覺乘」「聲聞緣覺菩提」「聲聞緣覺」「聲聞獨覺」「二乘道」「二乘智」「二乘見」等語;其中「獨覺」與「緣覺」並見,且有時依次稱聲聞為「下乘」、獨覺為「中乘」,與大乘相對。

本經主要從菩薩趣向無上菩提的立場論二乘。菩薩即使身處地獄、餓鬼、畜生,承受重苦,亦不求聲聞緣覺乘,不以自得解脫為念,而勸化眾生發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心;偈中概括為修慈悲心而「不求二乘道」。 大乘被說為平等、廣大、如虛空且無罣礙之乘,趣向大菩提的殊勝清淨道「非諸二乘等」所能發趣。 因此,聞法後應「遠離於二乘,求無上菩提」;發願者亦表明終不求二乘,而專求一切智、於佛智慧不退轉。

本經又將親近或稱讚二乘視為可能妨礙菩薩道的因素。「讚說二乘」列為應捨離惡友的特徵之一;修行法目則說應「遠二乘見」而「讚歎大乘」。 文殊師利以反說法表示,對煩惱與二乘「都無所愛」。 譬喻中,聲聞緣覺被說為欲離生死曠野而安住不動的「下劣眾生」,又譬作法性窄道兩旁的深坑;菩薩「不視左右」,即不讚聲聞緣覺乘,而以智慧方便與四攝法前進,利益眾生。

在佛土描寫與授記中,清淨佛土可呈現全無二乘的形態:普淨世界「無有二乘」,甚至沒有聲聞、緣覺之名,純為菩薩,如來唯宣不退轉菩薩大法;另一授記佛土亦皆為大菩薩與一生補處者,無有求聲聞二乘之人。

不過,本經亦說如來依眾生根性方便施設諸乘:聲聞根而修獨覺方便者說下乘,獨覺根而修聲聞方便者說中乘;大乘根而修二乘智,或下劣根修大乘行者,則隨根說大乘或二乘。 更進一步,第一義中「無有二乘」;如來方便所說二乘即是大乘,二乘同入一乘,而一乘即勝義乘。聲聞、獨覺雖初證聖諦,所具之智仍非究竟出世第一義智,究竟破除一切煩惱之智唯屬如來境界。 本經並以如來放光入膝或肩,象徵諸乘差別中的二乘人;入頂之光則關聯佛乘授記。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》以「二乘」概括聲聞乘與緣覺乘,並常把二乘置於菩薩道與如來境界的對照中。經中說菩薩所修禪定「勝於二乘諸禪三昧」,又以「不與聲聞辟支佛共」標明菩薩禪定的殊勝與不共:菩薩修定不僅求寂滅,還為了知眾生心、度脫眾生、不斷三寶種、具足善法及通智;雖知一切色、心行等法滅盡,卻「不證盡」「不證於滅」。在通智差別中,經文又說菩薩之智「過於二乘學無學智」,顯示其重點在超越二乘所得之禪定與智慧,而不止於神通境界。

本經對二乘內部亦作細密分辨,從修學次第說明聲聞、緣覺與如來在禪定上的共與不共。先修大乘而退入聲聞乘者,雖能入初禪乃至滅盡定,得三解脫門、四攝事、四梵住,仍不得三不護乃至一切智智;此被稱為聲聞、緣覺、如來所共的「禪平等」。久修聲聞乘後入緣覺乘者,則於諸禪、三解脫門及滅盡定中思惟求因緣法,形成緣覺與如來共而不共聲聞的禪平等。未學聲聞乘而善學緣覺乘者,也以初禪為依,思惟因緣法,趣入「三行滅無餘第一義滅定」。

經文另述先學大乘而退入緣覺乘者,於四禪、四無色定及諸處皆思惟求因緣法,以三解脫門得不可說三昧,稱為「佉伽毘沙拏劫辟支佛」及「世間獨福田」。此處以斷生死有海與諸苦、於不可說義能自覺知,說明緣覺的第一義禪清淨平等;隨後又提出如來不依陰、界、入乃至有無而入定的境界,明言此為「不共聲聞緣覺」。因此,本經並非只籠統貶抑二乘,而是依禪定、因緣觀、解脫門與所得智慧,分層敘述三乘之共法及不共法。

在術語方面,本經直接使用總稱「二乘」,分稱則見「聲聞乘」「緣覺乘」;指二類行者時,既用「聲聞辟支佛」,也用「聲聞緣覺」。其中「辟支佛」與「緣覺」在經文中並見,記錄本經用詞時不宜只保留其中一稱。 偈頌又說眾生聞法後,有趣大菩提者,也有「得二乘道」者,另有得人天樂、果位及羅漢三摩提者;這顯示二乘道亦被列為正法教化所能導致的不同歸趣之一。

Related