Dharma · AI Companion

苦行

duṣkaracaryā

以艰苦方式锻炼身心的修行。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is a deep interpretation of the Buddhist concept of 苦行 (*Kǔxíng*, Asceticism or Self-Mortification), tailored for contemporary readers, mapping its profound place within the path of liberation.


1. 这个概念在说什么 (What is this concept talking about?)

When we hear the word 苦行 (*kǔxíng*, asceticism/self-mortification), we often imagine a starving hermit in a cave. In early Buddhist texts, *kǔxíng* originally referred to the extreme physical torment practiced by various ascetics (外道, *wàidào* - practitioners of other paths, such as the Jains or Niganthas) to eliminate past karma (消业, *xiāoyè*) or attain enlightenment (证道, *zhèngdào*).

These practitioners engaged in what the texts call "countless sufferings, enslaving this body" (无数众苦,苦役此身). They practiced extreme fasting (eating only once a month, or eating cow dung and weeds), wore tree bark or practiced absolute nakedness (倮形/裸形无衣, *luǒxíng wúyī*), and held bizarre, painful postures like standing on one foot all day or sleeping on thorns.

Why did they do this? Their practice was rooted in Past Karma Determinism (宿作因论, *sùzuòyīnlùn*). They believed that all present experiences—pleasure or pain—were strictly determined by past actions. Therefore, the only way to attain liberation was to "pay off" this karmic debt through intense present physical suffering, which they called "bodily punishment" (身罚, *shēnfá*), while avoiding new actions.

The Buddha, who himself practiced "six years of severe asceticism" before his enlightenment, thoroughly and systematically dismantled this approach. He redefined the concept completely, shifting it from the torture of the body to the purification of the mind. In the Buddhist framework, true *kǔxíng* has several rigorous layers:

* The Critique of the False Path: The Buddha declared extreme bodily asceticism as a "base karma, severely painful, practiced by commoners, and not the noble path" (下贱业,至苦至困,凡人所行,非是圣道). He used a brilliant metaphor: "Like a bowstring snapping with sound" (如弓弹有声). Pulling an empty bowstring makes a loud, impressive noise, but it shoots no arrow and hits no target. It is a "false skillful means with no real gain" (虚妄方便,空断无获). It is merely "self-harm" (自害, *zìhài*). * The Redefinition of True Asceticism: For the Buddha, true asceticism is the ruthless, complete eradication of unwholesome mental states (烦恼, *kleshas*). True *kǔxíng* is described as: "Knowing this ascetic practice completely eradicates [unwholesome dharmas], pulling out their roots so they never arise again" (彼苦行法知断灭尽,拔绝其根,至竟不生). It must arise from the mind (从心起, *cóng xīn qǐ*), free from resentment and malice. * The Tree Metaphor of Progression: In the *Dīrgha Āgama* (长阿含经), the Buddha structures true asceticism like a tree: 1. The Bark (皮): "Flawless Asceticism" (无垢苦行, *wúgòu kǔxíng*). Practicing moral purity and meditation without seeking fame, offerings, or displaying arrogance. (Contrast this with "stained asceticism" [有垢/秽], where one endures pain just to show off or look down on others). 2. The Nodes (树节): Cultivating the Four Immeasurables (慈悲喜舍 - Loving-kindness, compassion, empathetic joy, equanimity) to fill the world. 3. The Solid Core (牢固无坏): Gaining profound meditative insight, such as the knowledge of past lives. 4. The Ultimate (第一): Complete liberation through the realization of the Middle Way.

2. 生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

Let’s map this exact classical definition onto contemporary life to see how often we fall into the trap of "heretical asceticism."

Scenario A: The Performative Hustle (Stained Asceticism) Imagine a young professional who wakes up at 4:00 AM, takes freezing cold showers, works 14-hour days, eats a hyper-restrictive diet, and aggressively posts about this "grind" on social media. * The Check: Are they practicing true discipline? According to the Buddha, if this extreme routine generates arrogance, a desire for validation (供养, seeking offerings/likes), or looking down on those who sleep until 7 AM (自贵贱他, exalting oneself and belittling others), this is Stained Asceticism (有垢/秽). It is essentially modern "sleeping on thorns." It looks impressive, but spiritually, it is an empty bowstring snapping loudly (*如弓弹有声*).

Scenario B: The Toxic Relationship or Workplace (Past Karma Determinism) Consider someone trapped in an abusive intimate relationship or a deeply toxic, exploitative workplace. They might tell themselves, "I just have to endure this suffering. I am paying off my karmic debts. If I suffer enough, things will get better." * The Check: The Buddha heavily criticized this mindset. He explicitly rejected *Past Karma Determinism* (宿作因论). He noted that present suffering isn't solely caused by past karma; it can be caused by environmental factors, seasonal changes, the harm caused by others, or plain "self-harm" (自害). Enduring abuse because you think you "deserve" it as a cosmic punishment (罚, *fá*) is delusion. True practice focuses on "Action" (业, *yè*): taking wise bodily, verbal, and mental actions right now to remove yourself from harm, using boundaries, not passive endurance.

Scenario C: True Asceticism at Work You are exhausted, and a colleague sends a passive-aggressive email. Your chest tightens; you want to write a scathing reply. True *kǔxíng* is sitting quietly at your desk, observing the raging fire of anger (瞋恚, *chēnhuì*) in your mind, and using the Mindfulness Awakening Factor (念觉意, *niàn jué yì*) to patiently dismantle that anger until it is uprooted completely (拔绝其根). No one applauds you. No one sees it. But this inner, quiet restraint is the true "Flawless Asceticism" (无垢苦行).

3. 当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

Contemporary society is obsessed with the transactional nature of suffering: "No pain, no gain." We have deeply internalized the heretical view that suffering itself is a currency that buys success, purity, or peace.

Algorithms on social media exacerbate this, rewarding extreme, visually shocking behaviors—the modern equivalent of ascetics eating cow dung to draw a crowd. We often mistake the intensity of an experience for its transformative power.

The Buddhist redefinition of *kǔxíng* acts as a profound psychological liberation. It tells us that self-harm is never a virtue. True growth does not require you to destroy your body or unnecessarily martyr yourself.

We can draw a parallel to training Artificial Intelligence in the contemporary era. If you want to train a highly intelligent neural network, feeding it massive amounts of corrupted, noisy, chaotic data (extreme physical torment) won't make it smarter; it will simply break the system or cause overfitting. True machine learning requires high-quality, clean, well-annotated data. Similarly, human liberation requires the high-quality, clean "data" of a calm, focused mind (无垢). (Of course, AI is merely a statistical tool, while the Dharma is a lived science of conscious liberation, but the principle remains: brute force without clarity yields nothing).

4. 常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

* Misreading: Buddhism teaches that we should suffer to be holy. * Clarification: Absolutely not. The Buddha explicitly rejected self-mortification as useless and harmful, stating it leads to suffering in this life and the next (even mapping the consequence to being reborn as a reanimated corpse hungry ghost, 起屍餓鬼, *qǐshī èguǐ*). The Middle Way is fundamentally joyful. The Buddha advocated for the deep, wholesome joy of the Four Dhyanas (四禅) in the present life, supported by a healthy body. * Misreading: All pain you experience now is just your past karma catching up to you. * Clarification: This is the exact view of the heretics (the *Niganthas*), which the Buddha called "foolish and unskillful" (愚痴不善不辩). The Buddha taught that present suffering has multiple causes, many of which are purely physical, environmental, or the result of present foolishness. Do not use "karma" as an excuse to remain in a state of victimhood or self-harm. * Misreading: "Asceticism" means just doing hard things. * Clarification: Pushing your physical limits (like running an ultramarathon) isn't necessarily Buddhist asceticism. True *kǔxíng* is about the mind (从心起). If you run 100 miles but your mind is full of ego, greed, and hatred, you are still bound. The hardest, most grueling asceticism is not fasting for a month; it is facing your own greed, anger, and ignorance minute by minute, and quietly putting them down.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在早期佛教经典中,“苦行”(duṣkaracaryā)主要指一种通过极端折磨肉体来企图消业、证道或求得清净的修行方式。外道(如尼乾子)主张通过当下的肉体痛苦来“灭尽”宿业,从而达到解脱。佛陀在成道前曾亲自实践过“六年苦行”并最终予以否定,指出这种极端的自我折磨并非真道。佛教对“苦行”进行了重新定义,强调真正的苦行不在于外在的肉体折磨,而在于内心的净化,即断尽一切不善法与烦恼。

二、主要阐述

1. 苦行的具体表现与外道理论 外道苦行者通过“无数众苦,苦役此身”,其具体表现极其极端,被统称为“受无量苦,学烦热行”或“自害”之行。在饮食上,他们极度限制饮食(如数日、一月一食,限制口数),甚至食用牛粪、鹿粪、草木果实或糠糟;在穿着上,他们披草衣、树皮、鹿皮,或“倮形”无衣;在居住与姿势上,他们常立不坐、常举手、修蹲行、卧于荆棘、灰土、板、杵、水中或牛粪上,甚至一日三浴、一足而立随日旋转等。 这些苦行背后的理论支撑主要是尼乾子等外道所执持的“宿作因论”。他们认为人一生所受的苦乐皆由过去世的宿业决定,因此企图通过当下的肉体苦行来“灭尽”故业,并配合今生对身、口、意的守护不造新业,以此达到苦尽解脱。为此,尼乾子设施了“三罰”(身罚、口罚、意罚),并认为折磨肉体的“身罰”最为严重和关键。也有外道认为生死有定量,否定通过持戒、受诸苦行来改变业力。

2. 佛陀对极端肉体苦行的系统批判 佛陀对这种折磨肉体的极端苦行持彻底否定态度,并从多个维度进行了系统批判: 首先,此类苦行“非是圣道”,属于“下贱业,至苦至困,凡人所行”,是“虚妄方便,空断无获”。众生的业报无法通过外在的断食或苦行强行转化,外道所执的消业理论纯属“洛漠说”与“愚痴不善不辩”。 其次,极端苦行不仅无益,反而有害。佛陀指出,精勤折磨肉体属于“自害”,会带来“受法现苦、当来亦受苦报”的恶果,死后不仅不能解脱,反而必堕地狱。例如尼乾子究罗帝在粪堆上伏舐糠糟,虽被愚人误认为是除舍骄慢的至高阿罗汉,实则因盲目苦行而腹胀命终,堕入“起屍餓鬼”中。外道所执持的“七苦行”等,往往最终无法坚持而自违誓言。佛陀强调,宁可受肉体极苦而死,也不要犯戒不精进、非梵行称梵行,因为后者因不善法报,死后必堕地狱。 再者,苦行具有极大的局限性。即使精勤修苦行、诵婆罗门典经历百年乃至五百岁,若心不解脱、不离尘垢,依然属于“卑下类”,不能度脱至彼岸。若以“慢緩業”或“秽污”之心修苦行,反而可能因“起恶触”而堕入地狱。刹帝利若修苦行,则与寂静相违。

3. 苦行的“有垢/秽”与“无垢/无秽”辨析 佛陀并未完全抹杀苦行一词,而是对其进行了道德与心理状态的辨析。 在《長阿含經》中,佛陀区分了“有垢”与“无垢”苦行:世俗或外道所行的苦行往往伴随着“垢秽”(杂染),如贪求供养、在人前假装坐禅、不接受正义、自赞毁他、乃至犯杀盗淫妄等恶业;而“无垢苦行”(或“离垢法”)则要求修行者不求供养、无论有无人皆常行禅定、欢喜接受正义、严持净戒、精勤修习禅定与智慧。 在《中阿含經》中,则表现为“行苦行者穢”与“行苦行者無穢”的讨论:若苦行者因行苦行而生起恶欲、自贡高、自贵贱他、到处宣扬自己、嫉妒他人受供养、生起邪见、起瞋恚等,则为“秽”;反之,若苦行者不自贵、不起嫉妒、无瞋无邪见、有正念正智,则为“无秽”。

4. 佛教对苦行的重新定义与层次划分 佛陀将“苦行”赋予了佛教特有的内涵: 第一,断尽恶法为真苦行。佛陀指出,真正的苦行应当是“彼苦行法知断灭尽,拔绝其根,至竟不生”,如来已将一切不善法断尽,这才是真正的苦行。 第二,苦行必须“从心起”。修行必须“从心起”,即心无结、无怨、无恚、无諍,与慈心相应,才能获得真正的喜悦与大果报。 第三,苦行的进阶层次。在《長阿含經》中,佛陀以树木为喻系统阐述了苦行的层次:仅达到“无垢苦行”还只是苦行的“皮”;若在此基础上能以“慈、悲、喜、舍”四无量心遍满世间,则被称为苦行的“树节”;若能进一步自识往昔无数劫事(即获得宿命通),则被称为苦行的“牢固无坏”(坚固之义);在此基础上进一步深化则达到“第一”之境。

5. 佛陀自身的实践与否定 佛陀在菩提树下初成正觉时,专心禅思,庆幸自己“今解脱苦行”、“善解脱苦行”,并由此获得无上菩提。面对魔波旬以“大修苦行处能令得清净”的劝诱,佛陀明确回应:“知诸修苦行,皆与无义俱,终不获其利,如弓弹有声”。虽然佛陀否定了苦行作为解脱之道的价值,但佛母摩诃摩耶夫人仍从赞叹的角度提及佛陀“经历阿僧祇劫,修诸苦行,不顾劳体,积德成佛”。此外,经中也提到天神曾询问佛陀为何在深林中“苦行自枯槁”。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典中,对于苦行相关概念的翻译与表述存在明显的差异: 1. 外道导师的称呼:《中阿含經》将尼乾子的尊师称为“親子”或“親子尼乾”。 2. 外道苦行的称法:《中阿含經》将外道的极端苦行方式称为“學煩熱行”;《雜阿含經》则将其消业理论斥为“洛漠说”,并将其行为定性为“自害”。 3. 裸体的译语:《長阿含經》多用“倮形”指代裸体;《中阿含經》则用“裸形无衣”。 4. 觉支的译语:《長阿含經》在论述真正的修行时,将“念觉支”译为“念覺意”。 5. 恶趣的译语:《長阿含經》中因盲目苦行堕落的恶趣被称为“起屍餓鬼”。 6. 苦行者的心行分类:《長阿含經》使用“有垢/无垢”;《中阿含經》则使用“行苦行者穢”与“行苦行者無穢”。 7. 导致忧苦的烦恼表述:《雜阿含經》将导致内心忧苦的烦恼称为“五因五缘生心法忧苦”,具体指“贪欲缠、瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑缠”。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 苦行与戒、见:佛陀强调,单纯的“离服倮形”和“苦役此身”属于“戒不具足,见不具足”。真正的“戒具足、见具足”应当是依止“念覺意”等七觉意修行,在现法中得“四禅”快乐,并最终以三昧心证得“三明”,达到“漏盡智生”。本经明确批判了非佛法正行的“外苦行”。 2. 罚与业:针对尼乾子以折磨肉体的“身罚”为首的“三罚”主张,佛陀明确表示自己不设施“罰”,而是设施“業”(身、口、意业),以此令弟子不行恶业。 3. 苦行与解脱:外道认为通过苦行能直接消业解脱;佛陀则指出真正的清净是通过修习“戒定闻慧道”获得的,修行者在面对恶名时应堪耐,而不应无益地自我折磨(“不应苦自苦”)。经中也指出“无有异苦行,无异伏诸根,无异一切舍,而得见解脱”。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《長阿含經》:“无数众苦,苦役此身”。 2. 《中阿含經》:“彼苦行法知断灭尽,拔绝其根,至竟不生”。 3. 《中阿含經》:“下贱业,至苦至困,凡人所行,非是圣道”。 4. 《雜阿含經》:“知诸修苦行,皆与无义俱,终不获其利,如弓弹有声”。 5. 《雜阿含經》:“虽闻多恶名,苦行者忍之,不应苦自苦,亦不应起恼”。

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論「苦行」,常用「苦行者」「苦行」「外苦行」「苦役此身」等語,並以「苦行穢污」「清淨苦行」「苦行無垢法」「苦行離垢法」辨別其層次與性質。經中所列苦行形式極廣,包括隔日乃至七日一食,食果、莠、飯汁、麻米、牛糞、鹿糞、樹根枝葉果實或自落果;披莎衣、樹皮、鹿皮、塚間衣,裸形、留髮、常舉手、常蹲、不坐牀席、臥荊棘或牛糞,以及一日或一夜三浴等,總稱「以無數眾苦,苦役此身」。

《長阿含經》並不一概呵責所有苦行人。佛明言,苦行者命終後既有墮地獄者,也有生天善處者,故稱佛「呵責一切諸祭祀法,罵諸苦行人以為弊穢」,並非如實之說;判別重點在於能否滅除不善法、增長善法,以及是否依正道修行。

經中尤其指出,外在苦行本身不能保證清淨。若苦行者希求供養恭敬,得供養後貪著不捨;在人前佯作坐禪;不肯認可正義、吝於答問;自讚毀他;犯殺、盜、婬、妄語等惡行;懈怠無智,或懷憍慢、瞋恨、巧偽、邪見,皆名「垢穢」。反之,不求供養、不染利養,有人無人皆守禪法,歡喜正義與解說,能見己過,不自稱譽、不毀他人,離諸惡業,精勤修禪智慧,持戒受誨、親近善人,才稱「苦行無垢法」或「苦行離垢法」。

即使具足上述離垢之行,經中仍說這只是「皮」。進而自不殺生、偷盜、邪婬、妄語,不教他人作,並以慈、悲、喜、捨遍滿世間,名為「樹節」;若又能教人離惡,並知宿命,則稱苦行「牢固無壞」。這顯示其所說苦行的深化,不以折磨身體為準,而依戒行、利他、四無量心及智慧逐層衡量。

另一段以「戒具足、見具足」明定超越諸苦行的尺度:裸形及種種苦身方便,若戒、見不具足,不能勤修,便非微妙第一;由精勤、專念一心、樂於閑靜、不放逸而得四禪,乃至以三昧心得三明、漏盡智,才稱沙門、婆羅門之最勝最上。經文又直指,只見裸形苦役其身,卻不能察知內心有無恚、恨、害,不能因此便名沙門或婆羅門。

《長阿含經》亦以事例破除把劇烈苦行等同聖證的看法:善宿因見尼乾子在糞堆上伏舐糠糟,便認為其苦行最勝、已除憍慢,佛則否定其為真阿羅漢;另有尼乾子雖長久執持七種誓行,後來仍逐一違犯。此處所批評的不是艱苦本身,而是由外相妄判清淨與果證。

對出家生活,《長阿含經》說衣僅為障寒暑、蚊虻並蔽身,食與藥為免病苦至死,住處為遮蔽及閑靜休息,皆以知足為度;同時明稱「行外苦行,非是如來所說正行」而以之自樂,是如來所呵責。故本經對苦行的核心立場,是不以極端苦身為清淨,而以離垢、持戒、正見、禪定、慈心與智慧判定其價值。

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「苦行」,首先具體列舉外道種種艱苦行法:裸形無衣,以手、葉等為衣;嚴格拒食、節食,乃至隔多日或一月一食;食菜茹、稗子、根果、自落果;穿毛衣、皮衣,散髮、編髮、拔鬚髮;常立斷坐、蹲行、臥刺,以及事水、事火、禮事日月等。經中總稱這些做法為「受無量苦,學煩熱行」,承認世間確有此類苦行,卻判為「下賤業,至苦至困,凡人所行,非是聖道」。

本經又賦予「苦行」另一層特定涵義:若沙門、梵志能將應斷的苦行法「知斷滅盡,拔絕其根,至竟不生」,才稱其為苦行;如來已令彼法永盡,故說「是故我苦行」。因此,同一詞在此既可指折磨身體的「煩熱行」,也可在問答語境中指徹底斷除此類法;辨識本經這種轉義,是統合異名時不可忽略之處。

對尼乾所主張的苦行滅業說,本經加以詰問。他們認為眾生所受皆因宿業,舊業可由苦行消滅,今生不造新業,便能業盡、苦盡而至苦邊;佛則指出,他們不能自知過去是否有身、曾否作惡、已滅多少苦,也不能證明現世因此斷除不善而成就善法。 經中又依其自答指出:上、中、下程度的斷與苦行,反而相應生起上、中、下之苦,故此苦正是現世所作;且樂報業不能由苦行轉成苦報,苦報業也不能轉成樂報,現法報、後生報及熟與未熟之業亦不能如此互轉,因而斥其為「虛妄方便,空斷無獲」。

本經亦從行者心行辨別苦行的「穢」與「無穢」。雖行「清苦行苦行」,若由此生惡欲、貢高、繫著、自貴賤他、自我宣揚、嫉妬受供養者,乃至生身見、邊見、邪見、見取及瞋、慳、嫉、諂誑等,便是「行苦行者穢」。 反之,不自貴、不賤他、不自稱難行、不嫉不訶他人,並遠離邪見、瞋纏、妄言等,具有正念正智,則稱「行苦行者無穢」。

此外,本經記尼揵以「行不坐行,常立不坐」承受重苦,並聲稱「樂不因樂要因苦得」;佛不接受其缺乏明證的推論。 對梵志所列誠諦、誦習、熱行、苦行、梵行等法,本經則將其善果歸於「心無結、無怨、無恚、無諍」的修習及由此所得的喜悅,而非單憑苦行形式。 術語方面,本經常見「苦行」,也用「煩熱行」「熱行」「清苦行苦行」「不坐行,常立不坐」描述不同形式與脈絡;此等皆是《中阿含經》原文的特有表述,宜分別保留。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「苦行」,以否定自殘式苦行為主調,同時保留佛陀自身六年苦行及其捨離之敘述。

一、苦行非究竟,非解脫正道 經中屢陳修苦行不能離塵脫縛。偈云:「精勤修苦行,不解脫離塵,是則卑下類,不得度彼岸」;又云:「勇捍行苦行,經歷於百年,其心不解脫,不離於塵垢,是則卑下類,不度於彼岸」;又偈直言「知諸修苦行,皆與無義俱,終不獲其利,如弓彈有聲」,以弓弦虛響為喻,否定苦行之實益;亦有「剎利修苦行,於靜亦復乖」,指若不得其理,苦行反乖違寂靜。

二、佛陀自敘六年苦行與棄捨 經敘佛於欝鞞羅尼連禪河側菩提樹下初成正覺,獨處禪思,自念:「我今解脫苦行。善哉!我今善解脫苦行,先修正願,今已果得無上菩提」。魔波旬化作年少,偈問:「大修苦行處,能令得清淨,而今反棄捨,於此何所求?欲於此求淨,淨亦無由得」,佛以偈答:「戒定聞慧道,我已悉修習,得第一清淨,其淨無有上」,明以戒定慧道取代苦行。又記菩薩本生:「苦行於六年,極受諸苦惱,知此非真道,棄捨所習行」,並指此處即問優藍弗仙人處、瓶沙王授半國處。

三、對外道苦行觀之破斥 舍衛城因緣中,有沙門婆羅門執見:若人有所知覺,皆由本所造因,修諸苦行令過去業盡,更不造新業則漏盡苦邊。佛斥為「洛漠說耳,不審不數,愚癡不善不辯」,列舉拔髮、拔鬚、常立舉手、蹲地、臥灰土中、臥棘刺上、臥杵上、臥水中、日三洗浴、一足而立等自害之相,又言世間真實有風痰唌唾、節氣、自害、他害等患,非可一概歸於業盡。另一段中以「持戒、受諸苦行、修諸梵行」並稱,又以縷丸擲空漸下至地為喻,喻八萬四千大劫生死定量,破斥苦行可斷業之執。

四、苦行與戒定慧、解脫之別 偈云:「無有異苦行,無異伏諸根,無異一切捨,而得見解脫」,言唯有伏諸根與一切捨,方得見解脫,別無異於苦行之途。又問「何故深林中,苦行自枯槁?」,以枯槁形容林中苦行之相。

五、苦行之持護與淨穢 經云:「穢污修苦行,不清淨梵行,彼不得大果,譬如拔葌草,執緩則傷手」,明沙門須善執護,方逮般涅槃;又示苦行者聞惡名應忍,不應苦自苦,亦不應起惱,堅住其心乃出家法。

六、佛母憶念佛之苦行 佛母摩訶摩耶天上來下,號咷而言:「我子積苦行,經歷無數劫,究竟成真道」,從親屬憶念之語,側寫佛於無數劫中積集苦行而成道之事。

術語方面,本經一律以「苦行」一詞為主,未見其他異譯;與之並舉者有「持戒」、「修諸梵行」、「持戒之所縛」、「解脫苦行」等,並以「自害」、「他害」、「節氣所害」對舉,凸顯苦行不等同於清淨梵行與持戒。

Related