Dharma · AI Companion

多聞

bāhuśrutya

多闻指对佛陀正法的广泛听闻与如实修行,是引导生厌、离欲以达解脱的基石。

A Contemporary Reading

In our contemporary age, we are constantly plugged in. We listen to podcasts during our commutes, stream audiobooks while doing chores, and consume an endless scroll of articles and video essays. We might feel that we are the most "learned" generation in history. Yet, despite this massive intake of information, our anxieties deepen, our burnout accelerates, and our existential dread remains untouched.

Why? Because accumulating data is not the same as walking the path of liberation.

In the Buddhist tradition, there is a profound concept known as 多聞 (Bāhuśrutya), which is often translated as "much-hearing," "erudition," or "being learned." However, to equate it with our modern notion of being well-read or highly educated is a tragic reduction. Let us sit down together as friends and unpack what this concept truly means, where it sits on the path to ultimate freedom (解脱道), and how it can profoundly shift the way we live today.

### 这个概念在说什么 (What this concept is about)

To understand *Bāhuśrutya* (多聞), we must first strip away the secular definition of "erudition." In the Buddhist scriptures, being "learned" does not mean being a polymath or a worldly scholar (what the texts call a 博士, a person of worldly erudition).

Instead, *Bāhuśrutya* specifically refers to the extensive hearing, retaining, and practicing of the Buddha's authentic Dharma—teachings that are "good in the beginning, good in the middle, and good in the end" (初善、中善、竟亦善). But even this definition must be placed firmly on the path of liberation (解脱道) to be fully grasped.

1. The Scope and the Standard: While the scriptures mention that *Bāhuśrutya* encompasses the "Twelve Divisions of Scriptures" (十二部经)—the comprehensive categorization of all Buddhist texts—the Buddha made a radical clarification. Quantity is not the essence. Even if a practitioner only memorizes a simple "four-line stanza" (四句偈), if they truly understand its meaning and apply it to their practice, they are considered a "truly learned monk" (多闻比丘).

2. The Ultimate Target: What is the purpose of this hearing? It is entirely laser-focused on the deconstruction of our suffering. True *Bāhuśrutya* means hearing the teachings about the Five Aggregates (五阴: form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) and Dependent Origination (缘起), and using this knowledge to generate disenchantment (生厌), dispassion (离欲), cessation (灭尽), and profound peace (寂静). It is not about acquiring intellectual toys; it is about dismantling the ego.

3. The Canonical Metaphor: The *Madhyama Āgama* (中阿含经) beautifully compares *Bāhuśrutya* to the "military weapons" (军器—bows, arrows, spears, and halberds) stored in a king's border town. Just as these weapons are strictly for defending the city against enemy invasions, "much-hearing" is the practitioner's arsenal to "eradicate the unwholesome and cultivate all wholesome states" (除恶不善,修诸善法).

### 生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in daily life)

Let’s map this concept onto a familiar contemporary scenario to see how it operates in real-time, and where we usually get it wrong.

Imagine you are commuting home after an exhausting day of overtime. You feel unappreciated, stressed about your finances, and frustrated with a colleague. To cope, you put on your noise-canceling headphones and listen to a highly intellectual podcast about stoicism, psychology, or even a deep-dive lecture on Buddhist philosophy.

The Common Mistake (False Bāhuśrutya): You listen, you nod, you think, "Wow, what a brilliant concept." You feel a brief dopamine hit of intellectual superiority. You might even memorize a quote to use in your next conversation. But your underlying resentment toward your colleague remains, and your anxiety about your job is untouched. You have merely collected another shiny idea. This is what the sutras warn against: chasing the sound and ignoring the essence.

The True Walkthrough (Authentic Bāhuśrutya): Now, let’s walk through the same commute using the strict classical definition of *Bāhuśrutya*.

1. Encounter and Reception (摄耳谛听): You listen to a teaching on impermanence. Instead of just passively letting the audio wash over you, you listen with respect and humility (下心), treating the words as a precious medicine (起良药想). 2. Pondering the Meaning, Not the Sound (思量其义理,不随于音声): You don't get caught up in how eloquent the speaker is. You take the core meaning—that all conditioned things decay—and you turn it inward. 3. Mapping to the Five Aggregates (五阴): * You look at your physical exhaustion (*Form/色*). * You look at the burning frustration in your chest (*Feeling/受*). * You notice how your mind is stereotyping your colleague as an eternal enemy (*Perception/想*). * You observe your urge to draft an angry resignation letter in your head (*Mental Formations/行*). * You witness the raw awareness of these events (*Consciousness/识*). 4. The Goal - Disenchantment and Peace (生厌、离欲、寂静): Through the lens of the Dharma you just heard, you realize none of these aggregates are a solid "self." The teaching acts as the "military weapon" (军器). It pierces through the narrative of the angry, overworked ego. You stop clinging to the resentment. The heat in your chest cools down. You arrive home in a state of quiet peace, rather than agitated exhaustion.

That is true *Bāhuśrutya*. It moved from the ear, to the mind, to the actual deconstruction of suffering.

### 当代人为什么需要它 (Why contemporary people need it)

We desperately need *Bāhuśrutya* today because we are trapped in an algorithmic echo chamber. Algorithms are designed to feed us what we already believe, reinforcing our prejudices, inflating our desires, and keeping us perpetually agitated. This is a state of constant "hearing" that only deepens our entanglement in greed, anger, and ignorance (贪恚痴).

From a contemporary perspective, we might look at cognitive science. We know through neuroplasticity that what we repeatedly expose our minds to physically rewires our brains. Consuming outrage-inducing media strengthens neural pathways associated with anxiety and reactivity. Conversely, actively engaging with calming, perspective-shifting narratives can foster cognitive flexibility and emotional regulation.

However, we must be careful not to equate scientific observations with the profound depth of the Dharma. Science can measure the calming of brain waves, but it cannot uproot the existential illusion of the ego; it leaves the fundamental question of birth and death unresolved. *Bāhuśrutya* goes further. It is not just a tool for emotional regulation; it is the foundational step of the path to liberation.

Without hearing the Dharma properly, we do not know how to observe our minds. Without observing our minds, we cannot meditate correctly. Without meditation, there is no liberating wisdom. *Bāhuśrutya* is the first spark of light in a dark room.

### 常见误读与澄清 (Common misunderstandings and clarifications)

Because "hearing" is such a mundane activity, *Bāhuśrutya* is frequently misunderstood. The classical texts are incredibly rigorous in warning us about these traps.

Misreading 1: "More information equals more wisdom." Many believe that having read hundreds of sutras makes them a great practitioner. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (大宝积经) delivers a chilling rebuke to this. It warns of the "Famed Ascetic" (名闻沙门) who recites texts merely to be known as learned, not for the sake of Nirvana. The sutra uses devastatingly precise metaphors for someone who is "learned" but cannot stop their greed, anger, and ignorance: * They are like someone "dying of thirst while submerged in a great flood" (漂没大水却渴死). You are surrounded by the water of the Dharma, yet you die of spiritual dehydration because you never actually drink it. * They are like a "doctor holding a medicine bag but unable to cure himself" (药师持药囊而不能自疗). You know all the theoretical cures, but you allow your own terminal illness of the ego to fester. * They are like a "precious jewel fallen into filth" (摩尼宝珠堕于不净中). The teachings are pure, but they are ruined by the filth of an arrogant, unpracticing mind.

Misreading 2: "Using Dharma knowledge to win arguments." It is deeply tempting to use our spiritual knowledge to debate others online or correct our friends. The scriptures recount the story of two monks, Panthaka and Abhibhū, who used their vast knowledge to argue over "who knows more and who is superior" (共诤多闻). The Buddha severely reprimanded them. The Dharma is a raft for crossing over the river of suffering, not a bludgeon to hit others with.

Misreading 3: "Clinging to the exact words." Ultimately, *Bāhuśrutya* must transcend itself. The highest teaching reminds us to "rely on the ultimate meaning, not on the letters" (依于了义不依文字). True learning eventually goes beyond language and sound. It is not merely what is perceived by the ear consciousness (耳识所知). The ultimate *Bāhuśrutya* leads to an internal, wordless realization—a state of profound equality that transcends mental forms (离心相).

In the end, *Bāhuśrutya* is an invitation. It invites us to stop merely collecting ideas and start letting those ideas dismantle our suffering. The next time you encounter a profound teaching, do not just applaud the speaker. Take the "weapon," turn inward, and begin the quiet, courageous work of setting yourself free.

Canonical Entry

### 一、 定义与核心要义 多闻(bāhuśrutya)在佛教经典中并非指对世俗知识的博洽,而是特指对佛陀所说“初善、中善、竟亦善,有义有文,具足清净,显现梵行”之正法的听闻与守持[chunk:2366, 2541, 3999]。其核心指向在于引导修行者对五阴、缘起等法产生生厌、离欲、灭尽与寂静,从而调伏诸见、发起解脱心[chunk:5025, 6038, 9825]。真正的多闻不仅在于听闻的数量,更在于对法义的如实领会与随顺修行[chunk:4383, 7970]。 ### 二、 主要阐述 多闻的范畴与标准: 多闻并非泛指世俗知识的博洽,而是特指对佛陀所说“初善、中善、竟亦善,有义有文,具足清净,显现梵行”之正法的听闻与守持[chunk:2366, 2541, 3999]。其具体范畴涵盖了“十二部经”(或称十二分教),包括修多罗、祇夜、受记、伽陀、优陀那、尼陀那、阿波陀那、伊帝目多伽、闍多伽、毘富罗、阿浮多达摩、优波提舍等[chunk:11132, 18047]。真正的多闻比丘,即使对极多教法中仅“四句偈”,若能“知义知法,趣法向法,趣顺梵行”,即是真正的多闻比丘[chunk:4383]。在解脱道上,多闻特指对五阴(色、受、想、行、识)及十二支缘起之生厌、离欲、灭尽、寂静之法的听闻与领会[chunk:5025, 6038]。 多闻的修集方法与行持态度: 修集多闻需要广泛寻求十二部经,求得后诵读、正忆念并如说修行[chunk:18047]。在求深法时,应当“思量其义理,不随于音声”[chunk:18069];闻所未闻法时,应心不违逆、不生谄曲与恶慢,一心思念其义[chunk:18053, 18067]。对待多闻与多闻者,修行者应具足八法:尊重、下心、发起精进、不失正念、随闻受持、心善观察、如闻转教、不自赞毁他[chunk:18854]。此外,还应行谦下心、摄耳谛听、思惟义趣,起珍宝与良药之想[chunk:16086, 16087]。 多闻的功德与实际效用: 多闻具有极大的现实与出世间利益,所谓“多闻解了法,多闻不造恶,多闻舍无义,多闻得涅槃”[chunk:16092, 16096]。在修行体系中,多闻能助圣弟子“除恶不善,修诸善法”[chunk:2366]。多闻是长老比丘获得爱敬尊重的“五法”或“十法”之一[chunk:2541, 2542, 3999]。多闻也是菩萨“多闻无悔之法”之一[chunk:18212],能令菩提心与善根“随回向不退失”,直接“利益菩提”,使人远离非法、趣向佛道[chunk:18078, 18079, 18080, 18081]。多闻圣弟子能主导心境,不随心自在[chunk:4383];在面对财产败坏、爱念别离等世俗变故时能不忧戚,堪耐饥渴、痛苦与恐怖[chunk:4018, 4019]。多闻还能免堕恶道,使人灭苦、生天,乃至证得须陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含等果位与涅槃[chunk:2373, 2374, 2600, 11151, 14233]。 多闻的误区与了义超越: 经典严厉警示了流于形式的“名闻”。“名闻沙门”为了让人知道自己多闻而读诵,并非为了厌离或涅槃[chunk:19326]。若“多闻而不能止贪恚痴”,就如同漂没大水却渴死、药师持药囊而不能自疗,或如摩尼宝珠堕于不净中[chunk:19326]。因此,所得多闻应作无私的“法施”[chunk:18441, 19233]。在最高层次上,多闻被予以了义的超越:若执着于文字则违背了“依于了义不依文字”的原则,真正的多闻法超越了文字与音声,非耳识所知,是“离心相”的平等法[chunk:18737]。 ### 三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 核心术语的表述: - 《中阿含经》(T0026)中常将此概念与“博闻”、“广学多闻”、“博闻诵习”、“受学博闻”等词并用或交替出现[chunk:2366, 2541, 3123, 3127, 3999, 4018]。此外,辩才无碍、所说微妙的圣者被称为“多闻阿罗诃”[chunk:3056];而在世俗中,通过“受学博闻”而获得知识的人则被称为“博士”[chunk:3123, 3127]。 - 《杂阿含经》(T0099)则多直接使用“多闻”或“多闻比丘”[chunk:5025, 6038],并强调“多闻通达法”[chunk:7970]。 - 《大宝积经》(T0310)中,除了“多闻”外,还使用了“精进修学多闻”[chunk:11393]、“持戒多闻”[chunk:11419]、“入于多闻”[chunk:18854]等表述。 2. 教法范畴的称呼: - 《中阿含经》提到佛陀所说教法包括“正经、歌咏、记说等十二部经形式”[chunk:4383]。 - 《杂阿含经》将其具体列举为“修多罗、祇夜、受记、伽陀、优陀那、尼陀那、阿波陀那、伊帝目多伽、闍多伽、毘富罗、阿浮多达摩、优波提舍”等十二分教[chunk:11132]。 - 《大宝积经》则称之为“十二部经”,具体译名为“脩多罗、祇夜、受记经、伽陀、忧陀那、尼陀那、如是诸经、本生经、方广经、未曾有经、阿波陀那、论议经”[chunk:18047]。 ### 四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与信、戒、施、慧的关系: 多闻常与净信、持戒、布施、智慧并列。在《中阿含经》中,它们共同构成“七水喻人”中不失善法的标准[chunk:2372],无此五法者在圣法中被称为“不善贫穷”[chunk:3647]。在《杂阿含经》中,多闻(“闻增”)与信、戒、施、正见并列为善男子修行的功德[chunk:5247, 11151, 14233]。在《大宝积经》中,亲近“持戒多闻”的慧比丘能得不退菩提[chunk:11419]。此外,修行者应当奉事那些能让人“增益信、戒、博闻、庶几、智慧”的人[chunk:4036, 4037]。 2. 与“力”的关系: 在《杂阿含经》中,多闻被列为“八力”或“十力”之一,称为“计数多闻力”,其特质是“多闻之人常现思惟计数”[chunk:7598, 7600, 7611]。 3. 与“思惟”及“实际修行”的关系: 多闻是修行的起点,但不能偏执。若仅偏执于持戒、多闻或禅定,而未得平等正觉,仍“终不得漏尽”[chunk:19213]。多闻必须与“行法次法向”[chunk:7970]、随顺法行[chunk:7971]以及“思量其义理”[chunk:18069]相结合。 4. 与“诤论”的关系: 多闻不应成为诤论的工具。如槃稠与阿浮毘二比丘因“共诤多闻”而受佛陀诫勉,指出不应持十二分教而共起诤论[chunk:11132]。 5. 多闻的代表人物: 在《杂阿含经》中,尊者阿难作为侍佛者,被誉为“多闻第一,撰集佛经”,赞为“多闻之大海”[chunk:7160, 7161]。尊者舍利弗亦被赞叹为“持戒多闻”,成就了捷疾、明利、出要、大、广、深等无上智慧[chunk:13646, 18486, 18488]。 ### 五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》:“广学多闻,守持不忘,积聚博闻。若有法,初善、中善、竟亦善,有义有文,具足清净,显现梵行,如是诸法广学多闻,守持不忘,积聚博闻。”[chunk:2366] 2. 《中阿含经》:“虽多闻,若有正经、歌咏、记说……然于其中能以四句偈,知义知法,趣法向法,趣顺梵行者,是谓多闻比丘也。”[chunk:4383] 3. 《杂阿含经》:“若思惟色、受、想、行、识是生厌、离欲、灭尽、寂静法,是名多闻比丘。如是如来所说多闻。”[chunk:5025] 4. 《大宝积经》:“多闻解了法,多闻不造恶,多闻舍无义,多闻得涅槃。”[chunk:16092] 5. 《大宝积经》:“若多闻人不能止贪恚痴,而作是言:‘我有多闻。’当知是人无有多闻。何以故?多闻者,为欲断除贪恚痴故。”[chunk:19326]

By Sutra

T0026 · 阿含部

在《中阿含经》(T0026)中,“多闻”是圣弟子修习善法、成就解脱的核心基石。该经对这一概念进行了多角度的深入论述: 一、 核心定义与术语形式 经中主要使用“多闻”、“博闻”、“广学多闻”及“博闻诵习”等术语。真正的多闻并非单纯的听闻,而是“广学多闻,守持不忘,积聚博闻”[chunk:2366, 2541, 3999]。其所闻之法必须是“初善、中善、竟亦善(或初妙、中妙、竟亦妙),有义有文,具足清净,显现梵行”的佛法[chunk:2366, 2541, 3999]。佛陀对“多闻比丘”给出了极具实践性的定义:虽然佛陀所说教法极多(包括正经、歌咏、记说等十二部经形式),但只要能对其中“四句偈,知义知法,趣法向法,趣顺梵行”,即是真正的“多闻比丘”[chunk:4383]。 二、 隐喻与修辞 经中将多闻比喻为王边城的“军器(弓、矢、鉾、戟)”,能助圣弟子“除恶不善,修诸善法”[chunk:2366]。此外,辩才无碍、所说微妙的圣者(如鸠摩罗迦叶)被称为“多闻阿罗诃”[chunk:3056];而在世俗中,通过“受学博闻”而获得知识的人则被称为“博士”[chunk:3123, 3127]。 三、 在修行体系中的定位 1. 贤圣尊重的标准:多闻是长老比丘获得爱敬尊重的“五法”之一[chunk:2541, 2542],也是可尊敬比丘的“十法”之一[chunk:3999]。 2. 善法与解脱的基础:在“七水喻人”中,多闻与信、持戒、布施、智慧并列。若失去多闻等善法则会“出已还没”[chunk:2372];若坚固不失,则能逐步证果乃至般涅槃[chunk:2373, 2374]。 3. 圣法中的富足:在圣法中,无信、无禁戒、无博闻、无布施、无智慧者被称为“不善贫穷”[chunk:3647];而多闻则是圣法中的富足。在对治不善的修行中,“不多闻者与多闻为对”,修行者当发心求于多闻[chunk:3370]。 四、 实际效用与功德 1. 自我调御与主导心境:弟子博闻诵习的目的是“欲自调御,欲自息止,自求灭讫”[chunk:4018]。多闻圣弟子不随心自在,而是“心随多闻圣弟子”[chunk:4383]。 2. 面对世俗变故的定力:多闻圣弟子在面对财产败坏、爱念别离时能不忧戚愁烦,能忍耐饥渴、寒热、痛苦,堪耐恐怖与恶念,乃至证得禅定[chunk:4018, 4019]。 3. 免堕恶道与证果:愚痴凡夫因不多闻而堕地狱,而多闻者能灭苦痛、生极乐,或证得须陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含等果位[chunk:2600]。 4. 奉事的标准:经中指出,应当奉事那些能让人“增益信、戒、博闻、庶几、智慧”的人[chunk:4036, 4037]。

T0099 · 阿含部

在《T0099》(杂阿含经)中,“多闻”这一概念被赋予了鲜明的解脱道色彩。经中不仅明确了多闻的定义,还阐述了其在修行体系中的重要地位、具体内容以及相关的实践要求。 ### 一、 多闻的核心定义与解脱指向 在《杂阿含经》中,佛陀对“多闻”的定义并非泛指世俗知识的博洽,而是特指对能够引导生厌、离欲、灭尽之法的听闻与领会: 1. 针对五阴的断爱:若听闻“色、受、想、行、识”是生厌、离欲、灭尽、寂静之法,并能如此闻持,才被称为“多闻”或“多闻比丘”,这也是如来所说的多闻 [chunk:5025]。 2. 针对缘起法的觉照:若听闻“老、病、死”乃至“生、有、取、爱、受、触、六入处、名色、识、行”等十二支缘起是生厌、离欲、灭尽之法,亦被称为“多闻比丘” [chunk:6038]。 ### 二、 多闻的具体教法范畴 多闻所依凭的教法,在经中有具体的术语呈现。佛陀指出,比丘所持诵和听闻的法包括“修多罗、祇夜、受记、伽陀、优陀那、尼陀那、阿波陀那、伊帝目多伽、闍多伽、毘富罗、阿浮多达摩、优波提舍”等十二分教 [chunk:11132]。真正的多闻者应当“多闻通达法,行法次法向” [chunk:7970],并随顺法行 [chunk:7971]。 ### 三、 多闻在修行功德中的定位 1. 与戒、施、慧并列的善法:多闻是善男子修行中不可或缺的功德(“闻增”),与净信、持戒、惠施、正见等并列 [chunk:5247]。若不亲近善知识、不数闻法,则会导致功德退失,乃至忘失戒、闻、施、正见 [chunk:5247]。反之,持戒多闻、力行惠施、正见成就者,命终能生于天上 [chunk:11151, chunk:14233]。 2. 作为一种“力”:多闻被列为“八力”或“十力”之一,即“计数多闻力”,其特质表现为“多闻之人常现思惟计数” [chunk:7598, chunk:7600, chunk:7611]。 3. 通往解脱的枢纽:不学多闻、不听受法者,难以调伏诸见,不能时时起解脱心;而乐于闻法、修学多闻、调伏诸见者,能时时得解脱心,被尊为“第一胜妙” [chunk:9825]。然而,经中也警示,若仅偏执于持戒、修习多闻或独静禅三昧,而未能获得平等正觉,仍“终不得漏尽” [chunk:19213]。 ### 四、 多闻的代表人物与诫勉 1. 多闻的典范:尊者阿难作为侍佛者,被誉为“多闻第一,撰集佛经”,赞为“多闻之大海” [chunk:7160, chunk:7161]。尊者舍利弗亦被赞叹为“持戒多闻”,成就了捷疾、明利、出要、大、广、深等无上智慧 [chunk:13646, chunk:18486, chunk:18488]。 2. 诫勉共诤多闻:经中记载了槃稠与阿浮毘二比丘因“共诤多闻”,各言“谁所知多?谁所知胜?”而受到佛陀的诫勉,指出不应持佛所说的十二分教而共起诤论 [chunk:11132]。 综上所述,《杂阿含经》中的“多闻”紧密围绕着“生厌、离欲、灭尽、寂静”的解脱宗旨,是修学者调伏诸见、发起解脱心的基石,但同时需与持戒、正见、思惟及实际修行相配合,方能达致漏尽解脱。

T0310 · 寶積部

《T0310》(宝积部,唐菩提流志译)中对“多闻”这一概念进行了系统而深入的论述,涵盖了多闻的功德、修集方法、行持相状以及对多闻误区的警示与超越。 一、 多闻的核心功德与利益 经中指出,多闻是菩萨修行的重要基石。在家菩萨应当“精进修学多闻”[chunk:11393],若能亲近、咨询“持戒多闻”的慧比丘,则能得不退菩提[chunk:11419]。多闻具有极大的现实与出世间利益,所谓“多闻解了法,多闻不造恶,多闻舍无义,多闻得涅槃”[chunk:16092][chunk:16096]。通过善听能增长多闻,进而增长智慧,最终证得第一乐[chunk:16092][chunk:16096]。此外,多闻是菩萨“多闻无悔之法”之一[chunk:18212],也是令菩提心与善根“随回向不退失”的四法之一[chunk:18078][chunk:18079],能直接“利益菩提”,使人远离非法、趣向佛道[chunk:18080][chunk:18081]。 二、 如何修集“如海不竭”的多闻 针对如何修集犹如大海般不可竭尽的多闻,经中提出了具体的修行路径。佛告富楼那,菩萨成就四法能广集多闻宝藏:1. 求法与行持:广泛寻求“十二部经”(即脩多罗、祇夜、受记经、伽陀、忧陀那、尼陀那、如是诸经、本生经、方广经、未曾有经、阿波陀那、论议经),求得后诵读、正忆念并如说修行[chunk:18047];2. 无所依止:于一切法中无所依止,得不住智与无碍知见[chunk:18047];3. 心无所著:以法因缘念佛及法,于一切法心无所著,从而能无碍解答问难[chunk:18047];4. 无所得慈:成就无所得慈,灭除一切事相、物相、法相而修慈心[chunk:18047][chunk:18050]。此外,求深法时应“思量其义理,不随于音声”[chunk:18069],闻所未闻法时,应心不违逆、不生谄曲与恶慢,一心思念其义[chunk:18053][chunk:18067]。 三、 多闻的行持相状与态度 经中详细列举了对待多闻与多闻者的正确态度。文殊师利指出“入于多闻”的八种法:尊重、下心、发起精进、不失正念、随闻受持、心善观察、如闻转教、不自赞毁他[chunk:18854]。在菩萨藏微妙法门中,听闻解了并随顺行持的相状包括:于多闻所心无有慢、恭敬多闻、生尊重心、行谦下心、摄耳谛听、思惟义趣、起珍宝与良药想、闻已能持、闻无厌足,以及闻说六度等法便能随顺修持[chunk:16086][chunk:16087]。 四、 多闻的误区、名实之辨与超越 经中严厉警示了流于形式的“名闻”。“名闻沙门”为了让人知道自己多闻而读诵,并非为了厌离或涅槃[chunk:19326]。经中以生动的比喻指出,若“多闻而不能止贪恚痴”,就如同漂没大水却渴死、药师持药囊而不能自疗、服贵药不当反受其害,或如摩尼宝珠堕于不净中[chunk:19326]。因此,真正的多闻者应不求利养,所得多闻应作无私的“法施”[chunk:18441][chunk:19233]。最后,经中对多闻进行了了义的超越。无垢施女与阿难的问答指出,若执着于文字,则违背了“依于了义不依文字”的原则;真正的多闻法超越了文字与音声,非耳识所知,是“离心相”的平等法,属于如来法王的彼岸境界[chunk:18737]。

Related