Dharma · AI Companion

無恚

avyāpāda

不怀瞋恨与损害之心。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么

In early Buddhist scriptures, Non-ill-will (*wú huì* 無恚; Pāli: *avyāpāda* or *abyāpāda*) refers to a pure, unpolluted psychological state and spiritual realization characterized by the complete absence of hatred, hostility, resentment, and malevolence.

To understand *wú huì*, we must first dismantle the common misconception that it is merely "not throwing a temper tantrum." In the classical early texts, the mind’s hostility is understood in precise layers:

1. **Raw Irritation / Aversion (*chēn* 瞋): The initial emotional surge of friction, annoyance, or fire when confronting an unwelcome object or event. 2. Lingering Hostility / Resentment (*huì* 恚): The secondary mental poison—when raw anger is sustained, nursed, and allowed to turn into active malevolence, hatred, or the desire to see another suffer. 3. Entangling Malice (*chēn-chán* 瞋纏): The chronic binding of the mind by hostility, where anger becomes a habitual lens through which reality is perceived. 4. The Silent Grudge / Stewing Knot (*bù-yǔ-jié* 不語結):** The insidious, passive-aggressive form of ill-will where resentment is suppressed into sulking, silent treatments, or cold spite without overt verbal outbursts.

*Wú huì* is the total eradication and overcoming of all these layers. It is not merely an ethical recommendation; in the *Madhyama Āgama* (《中阿含經》), the Buddha sets it as the non-negotiable benchmark for ultimate liberation:

*"Only the non-resentful attain the ultimate truth; the resentful do not attain the ultimate truth."* (無恚者得究竟是,非有恚者得究竟是)

In this framework, *wú huì* stands alongside non-greed (*wú yù* 無欲) and non-delusion (*wú chī* 無癡) as an irreducible characteristic of Awakening (*Nirvāṇa*). Furthermore, in the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (《雜阿含經》), it is designated as the "Supreme Heavenly Path" (*zuì shàng zhū tiān tiān dào* 最上諸天天道)—a state of mind so refined and unblemished that it aligns with the highest realms of existence.

To achieve *wú huì*, the scriptures characterize anger as a "poison root" (*dú gēn* 毒根) or "poison foundation" (*dú běn* 毒本). It is a mental toxin that burns the container holding it before it ever touches anyone else. Thus, the texts use intense, uncompromising language, instructing practitioners to "kill hostility" (*shā yú chēn-huì* 殺於瞋恚) or "slay the vicious poison of resentment" (*hài xiōng è chēn-huì* 害凶惡瞋恚).

Crucially, the early texts provide a vivid, structural metaphor for this practice: **The Master Charioteer (*shàn yù-shì* 善御士).**

*"He who can hold back surging anger when it arises is like one who reins in a galloping war-chariot; him alone I call a true charioteer, not merely one who holds the reins."* (盛瞋恚能持,如制逸馬車)

This metaphor establishes that *wú huì* is not passive numbness. It is active, powerful self-mastery—the capacity to recognize the wild momentum of rage as it surges through the mind and bring it to a complete, controlled halt before it destroys the carriage and the driver.


生活里的走查

To see how *wú huì* operates—and where contemporary people most often misidentify it—let us walk through four typical scenarios of modern life.

1. Doomscrolling and Algorithmic Outrage

* The Scenario: You are scrolling through social media late at night. An algorithm pushes a controversial post into your feed designed specifically to provoke moral outrage. You feel a sudden surge of heat in your chest. You type out a scathing, sarcastic reply to "demolish" the original poster, feeling a momentary rush of righteous triumph. * Classical Mapping: The initial spark is *chēn* (瞋, aversion). Allowing it to fester into personal attack or malicious condemnation becomes *huì* (恚). Dropping a harsh comment maps directly onto "uttering harsh words" (*fā yú cū yán* 發於麁言). * Where We Map It Wrong: Modern culture often justifies this as "standing up for truth" or "expressing honest emotion." But early Buddhism looks directly at the underlying mental state: if your motivation contains the desire to wound, demean, or punish, you have ingested the poison root. The scripture reminds us: *"Even when hostility surrounds you, do not utter harsh words, do not seek out the faults of others... maintain self-protection and inner introspection"* (不發於麁言,不求他過,常自防護,以義內省).

2. Workplace Inequality and the "Hard Worker's Bitter Heart"

* The Scenario: You work long hours, putting in intense effort on a difficult project. However, during the annual review, a charismatic colleague who seems to put in half the work gets the promotion and public praise. You don't make a scene, but you stop speaking to them, roll your eyes behind their back, and quietly hope their next project fails. * Classical Mapping: In the *Madhyama Āgama*, the Buddha addresses the ascetic practitioner named *Wú Huì* (無恚) on the difference between "asceticism with defilement" (*xíng kǔ-xíng zhě huì* 行苦行者穢) and "asceticism without defilement" (*xíng kǔ-xíng zhě wú huì* 行苦行者無穢). * Where We Map It Wrong: We often think that because we are enduring hard work (modern "asceticism") and keeping our mouths shut, we are practicing virtue. But the scripture explicitly warns that if your hard work leads to envy (*jí-dù* 嫉妬), exalting yourself while belittling others (*zì guì jiàn tā* 自貴賤他), or harboring a silent grudge/sulking knot (*bù-yǔ-jié* 不語結), your effort is fundamentally "polluted" (*huì* 穢). True *wú huì* requires that even under hardship, one remains free from jealousy when witnessing others receiving honors and praise.

3. Intimate Conflict and the Refusal to Escalate

* The Scenario: During a heated argument over chores or finances, your partner loses their temper and hurls a sharp, unfair insult at you. Everything inside you screams to hit back where it hurts most—you know their deepest insecurities and could easily crush them with a single sentence. * Classical Mapping: This is the exact moment of the Master Charioteer (*制逸馬車*). The horses of rage are galloping toward a cliff. * Where We Map It Wrong: Misdirected instinct tells us that returning blow for blow is "fairness" or "defending one's dignity." Early Buddhism turns this logic on its head: *"Do not return hostility for hostility"* (見瞋莫瞋報 / 不以瞋報瞋). The scriptures assert that anyone can hold the reins when the path is smooth, but only the person who can brake the galloping chariot of emotional escalation in mid-air is truly strong. Subduing one's urge to retaliate with a "softened, humble mind" (*ruǎn xià xīn* 軟下心) is not surrender; it is subduing the hardest enemy of all.

4. Parenting Under Fatigue

* The Scenario: You have had a grueling 10-hour workday. You come home exhausted, needing five minutes of quiet, but your young child knocks over a glass of juice, spills it across your computer, and starts throwing a tantrum. * Classical Mapping: The sheer physical exhaustion creates a fertile soil for *chēn-huì*. * Where We Map It Wrong: We often mistake suppressed anger for patience—we clench our teeth, paste on a fake smile, but radiate cold fury. The child senses this immediately. *Wú huì* is not passive suppression; it is the active cultivation of a non-hostile heart. It is taking a breath, recognizing that the child is not acting out of malice, and actively relaxing the mental grip of resentment so that wisdom and kindness can respond instead of impulse.


当代人为什么需要它

We live in an age of hyper-connectivity and high-velocity friction. Contemporary life is structurally designed to inflame hostility:

1. The Outrage Economy: Digital platforms operate on algorithms that maximize engagement. Neurologically and sociologically, nothing drives clicks, shares, and screen time faster than indignation and outrage. We are daily enticed to consume and generate emotional poison. 2. Chronic Micro-Resentment: Modern work environments, traffic jams, and impersonal digital communication subject us to continuous, low-grade frustration. Because we cannot punch our boss or scream in a traffic jam, we internalize this frustration, letting it curdle into chronic *bù-yǔ-jié* (silent grudges), cynicism, and background anxiety.

What early Buddhism offers contemporary readers is a profound liberation strategy.

When the scriptures urge us to "kill hostility" (*shā yú chēn-huì* 殺於瞋恚), they promise immediate, practical benefits that directly address modern suffering:

* **Tranquil Sleep (*ān-yǐn mián* 安隱眠):** The texts explicitly state: *"He who kills hostility sleeps in peace"* (殺於瞋恚者,而得安隱眠). Chronic anger keeps the sympathetic nervous system locked in a fight-or-flight response, ruining sleep quality. Slaying ill-will releases the physiological and mental tension that causes insomnia. * **Long-Term Freedom from Fear and Grief (*cháng yè wú yōu huàn* 長夜無憂患):** Hostility is always accompanied by fear—fear of being attacked, fear of losing control, fear of retribution. A mind free from hostility has nothing to defend, no enemies to watch out for, and thus rests in an unshakable state of safety and inner ease. * **The Awakening of Wisdom (*huì zhě wú yǒu chēn* 慧者無有瞋):** The *Saṃyukta Āgama* notes: *"The wise one has no hostility; they tame their mind through right livelihood."* Hostility clouds cognitive clarity; it narrows our perception so that we see only threats and enemies. *Wú huì* restores expansive, objective vision.

*A Note on Science and Neuroscience:* Modern neuroscience validates that chronic anger floods the brain with cortisol and adrenaline, damaging the hippocampus and straining the cardiovascular system. Mindfulness-based interventions demonstrate that emotional regulation lowers amygdala reactivity. However, we must recognize the limits of scientific parallels: neuroscience views anger management primarily as a biological self-regulation hack for health or productivity. Early Buddhism views *wú huì* as an ethical and spiritual awakening—a total unbinding of the mind (*citta-vimutti*) that breaks the cycle of karmic reactivity and opens the door to ultimate freedom (*jiū-jìng shì* 究竟是).


常见误读与澄清

誤讀一:「無恚」就是把情緒壓抑下去、搞「毒性正能量」(Toxic Positivity)?

澄清: This is the most common contemporary trap. Many people believe that practicing non-anger means bottling up their feelings, pretending everything is fine, and forcing a smile while hurting inside.

Early scriptures explicitly condemn this. In the *Madhyama Āgama*, the Buddha explicitly labels the practice of bottling up resentment as "asceticism with defilement" (*xíng kǔ-xíng zhě huì* 行苦行者穢). Internalized anger forms a "stewing knot" (*bù-yǔ-jié* 不語結)—a toxic internal dam.

*Wú huì* is not suppression; it is dissolution through wisdom. Suppression is pushing the fire underground where it bakes the soil; *wú huì* is removing the fuel entirely by seeing that the other person is driven by their own ignorance, and that holding onto anger is like swallowing poison expecting the other person to die.

誤讀二:「無恚」意味著懦弱、任人宰割、取消邊界?

澄清: In modern eyes, "not returning anger for anger" looks like being a doormat. But the early texts frame *wú huì* as the ultimate expression of power and courage.

In the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, the Buddha states that returning anger for anger is the mark of a weak, foolish person. Conversely, refusing to react with hostility when provoked is described as "subduing the hardest enemy to subdue" (臨敵伏難伏).

*Wú huì* does not mean you cannot say "no," enforce strict professional boundaries, or take legal and practical action to stop injustice. It means you take those necessary actions without the internal poison of malevolence. Action born of clarity and firmness is far more effective than action driven by blinding rage.

誤讀三:只要外表言行得體,心裏酸一下、恨一下沒關係?

澄清: Modern social etiquette focuses almost entirely on external behavior—as long as you maintain polite speech (*cū yán* is avoided), you are considered civilized.

However, early Buddhism places the decisive weight on the karmic quality of the mind. The *Madhyama Āgama* warns that one can perform rigorous spiritual routines, maintain flawless decorum, and yet remain deeply defiled if the inner mind harbors envy (*jí-dù*), arrogance (*zì guì*), or subtle malicious pleasure at another's downfalls. *Wú huì* demands an absolute honesty with oneself—an internal self-examination (*yǐ yì nèi xǐng* 以義內省) that purifies intention at the deepest root, ensuring that both the container and the content remain completely unblemished.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「無恚」(avyāpāda)是指不生瞋恨、远离恚怒的清净心理状态与修行境界。在阿含经典中,它不仅是修行者达成究竟解脱(“究竟是”)的必要条件,也是最上的諸天天道,体现了智慧与自心的调伏。

二、 主要阐述

1. 究竟解脱与天道之基

在《中阿含經》中,佛陀通过引导比丘与异学的问答,确立了究竟真理或解脱的判定标准,明确指出:“無恚者得究竟是,非有恚者得究竟是”。这表明“無恚”是修行者达成究竟解脱不可或缺的心理与德行基础。而在《雜阿含經》中,此境界被提升至极高的修行地位,被称为“最上諸天天道”。圣弟子通过念如来事,断除恶贪与心恶不善,并在经历随喜、欢悦、身猗息、觉受乐及三昧定后,发愿在任何世间皆“不起瞋恚”,受持此纯一满净的诸天天道。

2. 修行实践与自持方法

经典详细阐述了在日常与修行中落实“無恚”的具体方法: * 不以瞋报瞋与修持软下心:面对他人的瞋恚,修行者应做到“見瞋莫瞋報”、“不以瞋報瞋”。若能远离瞋恚与憍慢(“離瞋慢”),修行“軟下心”,方能于佛所修行梵行。 * 防护言语与内省:即使他人瞋恚盛行,也应做到“不發於麁言”,不寻求、不张扬他人的过失,而应常自防护、以义内省,做到“不怒亦不害”。 * 盛瞋能持的御士比喻:经典将控制盛怒比喻为控制狂奔的马车。若能在瞋恚兴起或强盛时自我控制(“盛瞋恚能持”或“起瞋恚能持”),就如同控制狂奔的马车(“制逸馬車”或“制狂馬車”),这样的人才是真正的“善御士”。

3. 苦行中的“无秽”境界

在《中阿含經》中,佛陀针对异学“無恚”详细剖析了苦行的两种性质,深化了对广义“無恚”的理解: * 苦行之有秽:若修行者在苦行时,因苦行而生起“瞋纏、不語結、慳、嫉、諛諂、欺誑、無慙、無愧”等烦恼,或造作恶业,乃至产生懈怠与恶慧,即属于被污秽污染的“不了可憎具足行”。 * 苦行之无秽:若修行者能做到“不惡欲、不念欲”,且“心不繫著”;在交往中“不自貴、不賤他”,见到他人受敬重供养时“不起嫉妬”亦“不面訶”,如此不生嫉恨、不自高自大的修行,才被称为“行苦行者無穢”。

4. 断除瞋恚(毒根)的功德

经典将瞋恚定性为“毒根”或“毒本”。修行者必须“杀”或“害”此瞋恚。能够“害兇惡瞋恚”或“殺於瞋恚者”,能使人得到“安隱眠”(安稳的睡眠),使心“無憂畏”或“長夜無憂患”,并且能令人“得歡喜”,受到“賢聖所稱歎”。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典与语境中,“無恚”及相关概念的呈现方式有所不同: * 《中阿含經》(《中阿含經》):主要使用「無恚」一词。在此经中,“無恚”呈现出双重性:一方面作为修行境界,指消除瞋恚的“無恚者”;另一方面作为对话人物,指一位名为“無恚”的异学(外道)。 * 《雜阿含經》(《雜阿含經》):表述极为丰富。除了「無恚」外,还广泛使用「離瞋恚」、「不瞋」、「無瞋」、「不怒」、「不以瞋報瞋」、「離瞋慢」等。在对待瞋恚的彻底断除上,使用了更具主动性的「殺於瞋恚」、「害兇惡瞋恚」等强烈字眼。

四、 与相关概念的关系

* 与“究竟是”及诸清净品质的关系:在《中阿含經》中,“無恚”与“無欲”、“無癡”、“無愛、無受”、“有慧、說慧”、“無憎、無諍”等并列,共同构成了唯一的、非众多的“究竟是”(究竟真理与解脱)之特质。 * 与“智慧”的关系:在《雜阿含經》中,“無瞋”是智慧的直接体现。真正具足正智、心解脱的智慧者是“無瞋”的(“慧者無有瞋”),他们以正命调伏自心。 * 与“嫉妒、自高”的关系:在苦行论述中,“無恚”的深化表现为不生嫉妒、不自贵贱、不自高自大,从而远离“瞋缠”与“不语结”等污秽。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含經》卷三十九:“無恚者得究竟是,非有恚者得究竟是。” 2. 《雜阿含經》卷三十:“無恚為上諸天天道……不起瞋恚,受持諸天天道。” 3. 《雜阿含經》卷三十六:“見瞋莫瞋報,不怒亦不害……盛瞋恚能持,如制逸馬車。” 4. 《雜阿含經》卷四十:“殺於瞋恚者,而得安隱眠,殺於瞋恚者,長夜無憂患。瞋恚為毒根,殺彼得無憂,賢聖所稱歎,殺彼無憂戚。”

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「無恚」呈兩個層面,術語用法各有側重。

一、作為修行品質之「無恚」。經中佛告比丘,應以「究竟是」之問詰難異學:「為有恚者得究竟是耶?為無恚者得究竟是耶?」異學答:「無恚者得究竟是,非有恚者得究竟是。」 此處「無恚」與「無欲」「無癡」「無愛、無受」「有慧、說慧」「無憎、無諍」並列,同屬「一究竟是」之內容——究竟唯有一相,非眾多相,無恚為其必要條件之一。 經文以「有恚/無恚」對舉,用「恚」字而非「瞋」字標示此煩惱之有無,此為本經在「究竟是」論述中的特定用語。

二、作為異學人名之「無恚」。另一經中,佛與一位名為「無恚」的異學苦行者對話,經文反覆以「無恚!」呼之。 佛為其辨「行苦行者穢」與「行苦行者無穢」:若因修清苦行而起「瞋纏、不語結、慳、嫉、諛諂、欺誑、無慙、無愧」,是為穢; 若起「妄言、兩舌、麤言、綺語,具惡戒」,亦為穢; 若「不信、懈怠,無正念正智,有惡慧」,亦為穢。 反之,無穢之苦行須「不惡欲、不念欲」「不貢高,心不繫著」、「不自貴、不賤他」、不至家家自稱苦行、見他沙門受供養不起嫉妬、不面訶他、「不愁癡恐怖、不恐懼密行、不疑恐失名、不增伺放逸」、不生「身見、邊見、邪見、見取」,且「無瞋纏、不語結、慳、嫉、諛諂、欺誑、無慙、無愧」,不妄言兩舌麤言綺語,「有正念正智,無有惡慧」。

三、術語觀察。本經論恚之對治時,穢法中以「瞋纏」為瞋恚類煩惱之具體表現,與「不語結」並舉;而在「究竟是」問答中則徑用「有恚/無恚」之抽象對舉。 「無恚」一名既為教義概念(無瞋恚之心),亦被用作人名(異學無恚),二者於同一部經中並見。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「無恚」,散見於天道修學與偈頌教誡兩類經文,其用語與切入角度各有側重。

一、以「無恚」為諸天天道之核心德目。經中佛告比丘有四種諸天天道,能令未淨眾生得淨、已淨者增淨,謂聖弟子念佛、法、僧、聖戒四事。念已則斷惡貪及心惡不善過,次第生隨喜、歡悅、身猗息、受樂、三昧定。定已,聖弟子自問「何等為諸天天道」,復自念言:「我聞無恚為上諸天天道。我從今日,於諸世間若怖若安,不起瞋恚,但當受持純一滿淨諸天天道。」此處「無恚」被標舉為諸天天道之上者,其修持內容即「不起瞋恚」,且不限於順境,於「若怖若安」一切世間境緣皆不起瞋,以「純一滿淨」形容此天道之圓滿清淨。經文並言「如是法、僧、聖戒成就亦如是說」,顯示四念處皆以無恚為歸趣。

二、偈頌中以「不瞋」「不害」「無害心」等語互文見義。經載偈云:「人當莫瞋恚,見瞋莫瞋報,於惡莫生惡,當破壞憍慢。不瞋亦不害,名住賢聖眾。」此處「無恚」之義以「不瞋亦不害」表述,強調消極面(莫瞋恚、莫瞋報、莫生惡)與積極面(破壞憍慢)並行,且以「住賢聖眾」為其身份標記——能如是行者即與賢聖同列。偈又以「盛瞋恚能持,如制逸馬車,我說善御士,非謂執繩者」為喻,謂真正善御者非執持繩索之外在約束,乃能於瞋恚熾盛之際自制其心。

三、進一步以「無害心」「不纏結」「不住瞋」描寫無恚之心相。另一偈云:「於他無害心,瞋亦不纏結,懷恨不經久,於瞋以不住。」此處術語更為細密:「無害心」就所緣境(於他)立言;「不纏結」就瞋之相續狀態立言,謂瞋不令心纏縛糾結;「懷恨不經久」就時間立言,謂縱有微恨亦不令其久住;「於瞋以不住」總結為不於瞋中安住。偈續云:「雖復瞋恚盛,不發於麁言,不求彼開節,揚人之虛短。」此明無恚非謂全無瞋念生起,乃謂瞋盛之時不發麁言、不伺他過、不揚人虛短,以「常當自防護,以義內省察」為功夫,以「不怒亦不害,常與賢聖俱」為果相。末句復以制逸馬車之喻重申「盛恚能自持」即為善御。

四、以「殺瞋恚」為斷毒本之喻。經又載偈:「殺於瞋恨者,而得安隱眠,殺於瞋恚者,而心得無憂。瞋恚為毒本,能害甘種子,能害於彼者,賢聖所稱歎。」此處以「殺」字形容對治瞋恚之徹底,謂能害瞋恚者得安隱眠、心得無憂,並明言「瞋恚為毒本」,能害一切甘善種子;能害此毒本者,為賢聖所稱歎。

綜觀本經用語,「無恚」為標目詞,與「不瞋」「不害」「無害心」「不怒」互文使用;「瞋恚」「瞋恨」「瞋」「恚」為其所對治之煩惱異稱。本經特色在於將無恚置於諸天天道之修學脈絡中,非僅作消極之「莫瞋」,而與念佛三昧、賢聖共住、善御自持等正面功德相繫。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論述「無恚」時,始終將其置於一組並列的否定性德目之中,而非作為獨立概念單獨展開。全經所見「無恚」的術語形式穩定,未出現「無瞋」「離恚」等異稱,與「無欲」「無癡」構成固定搭配。

一、偈頌中的「無欲無恚」三疊結構。經中以重章偈頌反覆宣說:「無欲無恚者,去愚無有癡」,此句三度出現,每次後接不同的修證果德——第一疊「漏盡阿羅漢,是謂名梵志」,第二疊「以捨結使聚,是謂名梵志」,第三疊「以斷吾我慢,是謂名梵志」。在此結構中,無恚並非單獨成就,而是與無欲、去愚(無癡)共同構成「梵志」的三重資格;三者缺一即不名為梵志。值得注意的是,此處以「梵志」稱呼漏盡阿羅漢,是《增壹阿含經》特有的用語習慣——將婆羅門(梵志)一詞轉化為佛教聖者的稱號,而無恚正是此轉化定義的核心條件之一。偈末「若欲知法者,三佛之所說;至誠自歸彼,最尊無有上」,以「三佛」指稱佛寶,亦為本經用語特色。

二、論義語境中的「究竟」判準。另一處經文記述眾多比丘入外道異學村論義,外道自稱與沙門瞿曇所說無異。比丘還白世尊後,佛教導以「究竟」為判準逐層詰問:「為一究竟?為眾多究竟?」答「是一究竟,非眾多究竟」;繼而追問此究竟「為是有恚究竟?為無恚究竟?」佛自答:「所謂彼究竟者,無恚究竟,非有恚究竟。」 此段論述的獨特側面在於:無恚不只是個人修養或心理狀態,而是被提升到「究竟」——即終極真理、最終歸趣——的本體論層次。有恚與無恚被設定為互斥的兩種究竟,不可並存,由此將無恚從消極的「不瞋」轉化為積極的終極實相之規定。同段中無恚與無欲、無癡、無愛、無受依次並列,形成五重否定判準,無恚居其二,顯示其在解脫論序列中的位置。

三、術語與表述形式的小結。本經用「無恚」而非「離恚」「無瞋恚」;用「有恚」作為對立面而非「恚」「瞋」單字;用「究竟」統攝諸德目而非「涅槃」「解脫」;用「梵志」指稱阿羅漢而非逕稱「聖者」「真人」。這些術語選擇構成《增壹阿含經》論述無恚的獨特面貌:以偈頌重章建立修證資格,以論義問答建立究竟判準,兩條路徑互為表裏,前者說「誰是無恚者」,後者說「無恚是何種真理」。

Related