Dharma · AI Companion

八法

aṣṭa-dharma

世间八法:利、衰、毁、誉、称、讥、苦、乐八种顺逆境风,圣者处世不为所染。其他以八为数之法目(八解脱、八大人觉等)不属此条。AI-generated

Type FrameworkDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

The term "八法" (aṣṭa-dharma, "eight dharmas") may at first appear to be a fixed list, but opening the scriptures reveals that it is a "framework counted to eight"—any set of dharma items enumerated as eight in the canonical texts can be called "eight dharmas." Thus, in the *Dīrgha-āgama* (長阿含經), under the general heading "The Tathāgata speaks the eight correct dharmas," four sets of eight are listed at once: the eight worldly dharmas, the eight liberations (八解脫, aṣṭa-vimokṣa), the eightfold noble path (八聖道, āryāṣṭāṅgika-mārga), and the eight kinds of persons. In the *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* (Southern edition, 大般涅槃經·南本), there appear "eight kinds of inconceivable things" and "possessing eight dharmas so as to uphold the twelve divisions of the scriptures." The *Daśabhūmika-vibhāṣā-śāstra* (十住毗婆沙論) even lists five different sets of eight dharmas as the text proceeds—from the eight dharmas by which a bodhisattva accumulates merit, to the eight dharmas of the causes and conditions for the first bhūmi, to the eight awarenesses of great beings (八大人覺) and the eight wrong paths (八邪).

But among all these "eight dharmas," one set stands out sharply and is most directly tied to ordinary people's daily lives—that is, the eight worldly dharmas (世間八法, aṣṭa-lokadharma): gain, loss, defamation, honor, praise, blame, suffering, and pleasure. This is the eight dharmas that this entry will examine in depth.

利 (lābha, "gain") is obtaining benefit, advantage, favorable circumstances; 衰 (alābha, "loss") is losing benefit, encountering loss; 毀 (apavāda, "defamation") is being spoken of badly behind one's back, one's reputation damaged; 譽 (praśaṃsā, "honor") is being praised behind one's back, one's reputation enhanced; 稱 (saṃstuti, "praise") is being complimented to one's face; 譏 (nindā, "blame") is being belittled or mocked to one's face; 苦 (duḥkha, "suffering") is painful experience of body and mind; 樂 (sukha, "pleasure") is pleasant experience of body and mind.

For these eight things, the scriptures offer a precise metaphor—eight kinds of "wind." They blow in from all directions like wind, knocking people this way and that. If you look carefully, these eight dharmas form exactly four pairs: gain pairs with loss, defamation with honor, praise with blame, suffering with pleasure. Each pair is two sides of one coin: where there is gain, there must be loss; where there is honor, there must be defamation; where there is praise, there must be blame; where there is pleasure, there must be suffering. You cannot take only one half and refuse the other—the wind blows as a whole mass, and if you stand in the wind, you will be blown upon by all of it.

In the *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* (Southern edition), the lotus flower is used as a metaphor for the Tathāgata:

蓮華者,即是如來;不污者,如來不為世間八法之所染污。是故,號佛為世間解。

*"The lotus is the Tathāgata; 'undefiled' means that the Tathāgata is not tainted by the eight worldly dharmas. Therefore, the Buddha is called 'World-Understanding' (世間解, lokavid)."*

The lotus emerges from mud yet remains unstained—not because it is not in the mud, but because it grows out of the mud without being defiled by it. Likewise, the Tathāgata dwells in the world, the eight winds blow upon him as they do upon all, yet he is not moved by them—hence he is called "World-Understanding," one who truly understands the world. It is worth noting that the sūtra says that Nirgrantha-putra (尼乾陀若提子, an ācārya of another tradition) could also achieve "not being defiled by the eight worldly dharmas"—showing that this is not exclusively the Buddha's prerogative, but a state attainable by practitioners.

In the *Daśabhūmika-vibhāṣā-śāstra* there is a particularly down-to-earth line:

利衰等八法,處世必應受。

*"Gain, loss, and the other eight dharmas—dwelling in the world, one is certain to receive them."*

These eight winds—as long as you live in the world, you will be struck by them; there is no avoiding it. The treatise continues: in past lives we have already endured much suffering for nothing; now, for the sake of the Buddha-path, what does it matter to endure a little more? There is in these words a very solid courage: not the fantasy that the wind will stop, but the learning to stand steady in the wind.

The scriptures also provide an important framework of contrast: set against the eight dharmas is the eightfold noble path (八聖道)—right view, right intention, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration. The eight worldly dharmas are the source of defilement (染污之源); the eightfold noble path is the path of renunciation (出離之道). One ties you to the world; the other leads you out of the world. The eight wrong paths (八邪—wrong view, wrong thought, wrong speech, wrong action, wrong livelihood, wrong effort, wrong mindfulness, wrong concentration) are the item-by-item opposites of the eightfold noble path, which practitioners must swiftly abandon. This contrast framework tells us: the eight dharmas are not merely "worldly phenomena," but more fundamentally "bondage of the mind" (心的繫縛)—they can bind you only because you care about them. Practice is not about making the eight dharmas disappear; it is about making them lose their power to move you.

A Walk-Through in Daily Life

Let's walk through a concrete scenario. You leave home in the morning, squeeze onto the subway, and pull out your phone to scroll. In that short half hour, the eight dharmas have already surged in like waves, several times over.

You see someone on Moments (朋友圈) posting a photo of their new apartment—that is "gain" (利). Your heart stirs: how come they have a house? Before that thought has settled, you scroll to a piece of bad news—some industry is about to lay people off. That is "loss" (衰). Your heart tightens: could I be on that list? You close Moments and open the work group chat, and find that last night the boss @-mentioned someone else in the group with a word of praise—that is "honor" (譽). Your heart turns sour: I worked so hard last month, why didn't he mention me? Scrolling further, someone has screenshotted your proposal and is picking faults with it in a discussion group—that is "defamation" (毀). You immediately feel irritated, thinking: I clearly did a decent job, why are they saying this?

You arrive at the office. A colleague says to your face, "That PPT you did last time was really great"—"praise" (稱). Your mouth is modest, but inside you feel good. The person at the next desk throws out a passive-aggressive remark: "You've been pretty free lately, haven't you?"—"blame" (譏). You immediately feel uncomfortable. After a busy morning, you have a good meal at lunch—"pleasure" (樂). In the afternoon the boss calls you in to revise the draft four times—"suffering" (苦). You see: not even half a day has passed, and all eight dharmas are accounted for.

The most common point where people mis-map this concept is right here: many people think the eight dharmas refer to "the great ups and downs of life"—the "got rich," "went bankrupt," "got married," "got divorced" level of upheaval. But what the scriptures define is "winds of favorable and unfavorable circumstances" (順逆境風)—when the wind blows, even if it is merely a light breeze, and ripples arise in your mind, that is the eight dharmas at work. One more like, one fewer like; a word from a colleague that is pleasant or unpleasant to the ear; the delivery arriving ten minutes late—these are all concrete operations of the eight dharmas. It is not the big events of your life; it is the micro-vibrations of your everyday thoughts. You are not blown by the eight dharmas only during "great ups and downs"—you are blown in every instant of "arising thought" (起心動念).

Let's walk through another, deeper scenario. You are arguing with your partner. The other person says, "You never consider my feelings"—this is "blame" (譏), face-to-face mockery or reproach. You immediately fire back, "You never care about me either"—what you return is also "blame." After the fight, you sit alone in the living room, replaying the exchange—what are you thinking about? You are thinking, "I've given so much" (you feel aggrieved; this is "loss" and "suffering"), and you are also thinking, "They simply don't understand me" (you feel misunderstood; this is a variant of "defamation"—not someone defaming you behind your back, but your feeling that your contributions have been "destroyed"). Then you pick up your phone and see a friend's message: "You look great today"—"praise" (稱). You feel a little better, but that feeling better is also one of the eight dharmas—you think you've come out of suffering, but actually you've only walked from the wind of suffering into the wind of pleasure. You have not left the wind zone.

The deeper meaning of this scenario is: the eight dharmas are not "things others impose on you," but "the labels your mind attaches to circumstances." The partner's words have no power in themselves; it is because you care about their evaluation that the words become a knife. A like has no power in itself; it is because you have tied your self-worth to that number that the number becomes a scale. The eight dharmas are like wind, but wind itself does not hurt people—what hurts is that you stand in the wind, refuse to be moved, and try to wrestle with it. The more you wrestle, the bigger the wind seems; stand still, and the wind passes through your body without a trace.

Another mapping error that is very easy to step into: conflating "praise" (稱) with "honor" (譽). The scriptures distinguish clearly—"praise" is being complimented to your face; "honor" is being praised behind your back. Why make the distinction? Because the psychological mechanisms are different. When praised to your face, you feel social pressure—you must be modest, you must respond. When praised behind your back, you feel a pleasure of "recognition I didn't know about, purely given"—but this more easily triggers attachment: you start imagining how people speak of you, you start managing your "reputation." Similarly, "blame" (譏) is face-to-face mockery; "defamation" (毀) is slander behind your back. Mocked to your face, you feel discomfort immediately; defamed behind your back, once you learn of it, you toss and turn and chew on it repeatedly. The scriptures list the four as separate items not to fill a quota, but to tell you: each of the eight dharmas has its own distinctive way of sticking to you. You must see each one clearly; you cannot say vaguely, "I don't care what others say."

Why Contemporary People Need It

In our era, the operation of the eight dharmas is more intense, more fine-grained, and more all-penetrating than in any period of the ancient world. Ancient people lived in face-to-face communities where the radius of reputation was limited—no matter how strong the eight winds, they had boundaries. Contemporary people live within algorithms and social networks: likes, comments, shares, read counts, follower numbers, KPIs, performance reviews—every number is an anemometer, and these numbers are jumping every moment.

You post an update, then refresh every five minutes to see whether anyone has liked it—you are waiting for "praise" (稱). You find no one has liked it, and a hollow feeling rises in your chest—that is a variant of "defamation" (毀): not someone slandering you, but your feeling "overlooked," and "being overlooked" operates psychologically just like "being defamed"—both are blows to self-worth. You see a colleague get promoted, a classmate buy a house, a peer succeed as an entrepreneur—you feel "loss" (衰), but if you think carefully, you have lost no material benefit at all; what you have lost is only "superiority in comparison." This era has turned "gain" into "visible gain" and "loss" into "loss quantifiable by algorithm"—you don't need to actually go bankrupt to feel loss; you only need to scroll and see someone else doing better than you, and the loss-sensation goes online automatically.

The situation of contemporary people is: the eight dharmas have not been weakened—they have been amplified. An ancient person might experience a few gusts of favorable-and-unfavorable wind in a day; a contemporary person can experience dozens in an hour. And the logic of the algorithm is—it knows which wind moves you, and it blows that wind at you. You like seeing others post their happiness; it feeds you happiness posts. You fear seeing bad news about your industry; it feeds you bad news about your industry. You think you are scrolling through your phone; actually the eight dharmas are flying you like a kite.

So another reason contemporary people need this concept more than ever is that it offers a possibility of not standing in the wind. Note: not "making the wind stop"—you cannot make social media stop, cannot make people stop evaluating you, cannot make gain and loss not occur. What this concept of the eight dharmas says is: you can choose not to stand in the wind. You can release that "self that gets blown by the wind." As the *Daśabhūmika-vibhāṣā-śāstra* says, gain, loss, and the other eight dharmas—dwelling in the world, one is certain to receive them. The wind is inevitable, but there are two ways of "receiving": one is passively taking the beating; the other is actively receiving. Practice is not building a wall to block the wind outside; it is turning yourself into a lotus—roots in the mud, flower on the water's surface; the wind comes and the flower sways, but the flower is not stained.

There is also a very contemporary point of entry: we are all talking about "emotional value," "mental attrition" (精神內耗), "feeling drained." The concept of the eight dharmas precisely identifies the source of internal attrition—when you invest your attention in the eight winds, the winds consume you. You repeatedly replay that remark that "blamed" you; you repeatedly savor that evaluation that "honored" you; you repeatedly compare your "gain" and "loss" with others'—these thoughts themselves are the fuel of attrition. The value of the eight dharmas is that it compiles a catalog for these messy thoughts. You don't need to vaguely "stop overthinking"; you can say with precision, "Right now I am being blown by 'defamation.'" When you can name that wind, you have already opened a little distance from it. That distance is the starting point of practice.

Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: "The eight dharmas are something to be eliminated."

This is the most common misreading. Many people, upon hearing "not defiled by the eight dharmas," think that practice means destroying the eight dharmas—no gain and no loss, no defamation and no honor, no praise and no blame, no suffering and no pleasure. This is impossible, and it is also unnecessary. The scriptures say it clearly: "Dwelling in the world, one is certain to receive them"—as long as you are alive, these things will come. The Buddha did not live in a world without the eight dharmas; the Buddha is "undefiled"—the lotus is not outside the mud; it emerges from the mud unstained. The eight dharmas are not an object to be destroyed, but an object to be seen through. You don't need to make the wind stop; you need to not be carried away by it.

Misreading Two: "The eight dharmas are just 'the mind of gain and loss.'"

Narrowing the eight dharmas to "don't be too attached to gain and loss" is another common simplification. The eight dharmas do include gain and loss (利, 衰), but they are not only that—there are also the four dharmas of the reputation system (毀, 譽, 稱, 譏) and the two dharmas of the feeling system (苦, 樂). Moreover, the relationship among these four pairs is not merely parallel but interlocking: you may not care about material gain and loss, yet care very much about reputation; you may not care about reputation, yet care very much about physical pleasure and pain. Everyone has their own most sensitive wind—some people collapse at the first gust of "blame," others are indifferent to "honor" but crumble at the touch of "loss." The subtlety of the eight dharmas is that it makes you examine each one, rather than vaguely declaring, "I've seen through it all."

Misreading Three: "The 'suffering and pleasure' in the eight dharmas are just physical suffering and pleasure."

The scriptures state clearly that the eight dharmas are the *worldly* eight dharmas—labels of "favorable and unfavorable circumstances." "Suffering" is not only bodily pain; "pleasure" is not only eating well. You get scolded by your boss and feel a weight in your chest—that is suffering. A client praises you and you feel buoyant all over—that is pleasure. Suffering and pleasure are the favorable-and-unfavorable experiences of both body and mind. And the key point is: **the suffering and pleasure in the eight dharmas are *worldly* suffering and pleasure—the suffering and pleasure of bondage.** Even if you win the lottery and grin from ear to ear, that pleasure is still one of the eight dharmas, because it makes you cling to the world more tightly. The true joy of practice is not in this category; it is a stable, clear joy that does not depend on external circumstances.

Misreading Four: "The eight dharmas and the eightfold noble path are the same thing."

This misreading is a bit roundabout, but worth clarifying. In the *Dīrgha-āgama*, the eight worldly dharmas and the eightfold noble path are indeed listed side by side as two sets of "eight dharmas," both within the framework of the "eight correct dharmas." But their positions are entirely different: the eight worldly dharmas are the worldly winds of favorable and unfavorable circumstances—the source of defilement; the eightfold noble path is the supramundane path of practice—the way of liberation. It is the eight wrong paths that are the opposites of the eightfold noble path, corresponding item by item. If you take the eight worldly dharmas as the opposite of the eightfold noble path, you have made a mistake—the eight worldly dharmas are "circumstances" (境), the eightfold noble path is "the path" (道). The two are not opposites; rather, while walking the eightfold noble path, you will still be blown upon by the eight worldly winds. The difference is: one who walks the eightfold noble path is blown upon but does not fall; one who does not walk this path is turned around by the first gust.

Misreading Five: "Not being defiled by the eight dharmas means numbness, apathy."

This may be the misreading most in need of clarification. Not being defiled by the eight dharmas does not mean becoming numb—quite the opposite, it means becoming more awake. Numbness is "the wind comes and I don't know it"; non-defilement is "the wind comes and I know it, and I stand steady." The lotus is not without sensation; the lotus clearly knows it is in the water, but the water cannot stain it. Among the eight dharmas that Ānanda possesses are "constant diligence" and "complete mindfulness"—that is an active, awake, warm state, not cold insensitivity. A person who is not defiled by the eight dharmas will still laugh when laughter is called for, and still grieve when grief is called for—only their mind is not bound. When you laugh, you know you are laughing; when you grieve, you know you are grieving; you are not dragged away by that laughter or that grief. This is not apathy; this is freedom.

Finally, let us place the concept of the eight dharmas within the whole path of liberation and take one look. The eight dharmas tell you: the world has wind; the wind is inevitable; and you are capable of not falling. It is a diagnosis, not a prescription. Having diagnosed where the illness lies, you then walk the eightfold noble path—right view sees clearly the nature of the wind, right mindfulness maintains awareness in the wind, right concentration steadies body and mind in the wind. The eight dharmas are not a reason for you to become world-weary, but an entrance into seeing the world as it is (如實看世). You don't need to flee to the mountains to escape the wind—you only need, in the midst of the wind, to grow a lotus flower.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

定义与核心要义

「八法」(aṣṭa-dharma)非指固定一组法义,而是佛教经典中以「八」为数目框架所组成之各类法义集合。「八法」一词随所依经文脉络不同,所指亦随之转变:或指世间八法(利、衰、毁、誉、称、讥、苦、乐),或指八解脱、八圣道、八人、八邪等修行阶位与法门,或指持经所需之八项德目,故须随文辨义,不可执一以求。

主要阐述

《长阿含经》在「如来说八正法」的总标之下,连续列出世八法、八解脱、八圣道与八人四组八项法义,视之为应共同撰集的正法,目的在防止诤讼、使梵行久立,且令天、人获得安益。世八法的原文定型为「利、衰、毁、誉、称、讥、苦、乐」;八解脱依次为:色观色、内无色想观外色、净解脱、度色想灭瞋恚想而住空处、度空处而住识处、度识处而住不用处、度不用处而住有想无想处、度有想无想处而住想知灭;八圣道列为「正见、正志、正语、正业、正命、正方便、正念、正定」;八人则依次列为「须陀洹向、须陀洹、斯陀含向、斯陀含、阿那含向、阿那含、阿罗汉向、阿罗汉」。 本经又提出「八灭法」,内容为八邪:邪见、邪思、邪语、邪业、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定;并称「八退法」为「八懈怠法」,以比丘因乞食不得等情形而不肯精勤于未得、未获、未证之法。 另有叙事称某王「成就八法」,但所引原文未完整列出八项内容。

《大般涅槃经(南本)》依不同脉络展开三组「八法」。其一为「世间八法」,以莲华为喻,云如来不为世间八法之所染污,故号佛为世间解;于尼乾陀若提子之段落亦称此师「世间八法所不能污」。 其二为「八种不可思议」,述阿难事佛二十余年,初不随佛受别请食、初不受佛陈故衣服等八项具体行谊。 其三正以「八法」为名,谓阿难具足信根坚固、其心质直、身无病苦、常勤精进、具足念心、心无憍慢、成就定慧、具足从闻生智等八法,能具足持十二部经;过去诸佛侍者弟子亦皆具足如是八法。

《十住毘婆沙论》中「八法」亦随文组成不同八项:一、能集一切功德之八法:大悲、坚心、智慧、方便、不放逸、勤精进、常摄念、善知识,为初发心菩萨应疾行者。 二、成就初地之八法:厚种善根、善行于诸行、善集诸资用、善供养诸佛、善知识所护、具足于深心、悲心念众生、信解无上法,具足即得入欢喜地。 三、能摄佛道之八法,即「八大人觉」:少欲、知足、远离、精进、念、定、慧、乐不戏论。 四、应疾远离之八法(八邪):邪见、邪思惟、邪语、邪业、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定。 五、世间利衰等八法:利、衰、毁、誉、称、讥、苦、乐,行者处世必应领受。

不同部类与译本的表述差异

《长阿含经》记录世八法时所用核心术语为「世八法」,特定分类脉络中又以「八觉法」标示其功能;八解脱一节使用「不用处」「有想无想处」「想知灭」等本经特有用词;八圣道使用「正志」「正方便」而非其他译名;八邪系列使用「邪思」「邪方便」一组术语形式。《大般涅槃经(南本)》释「世间」时用「五阴」而非一般部派常见之「五蕴」,与一般部派用语一致;八种不可思议属事相层面,持经之八法则属抽象德目,二者虽皆冠以「八」数而所指各异。《十住毘婆沙论》八邪系列作「邪思惟」(与长阿含之「邪思」用字不同);「八大人觉」之名相与他经常见之「八正道」分际不同,乃取觉悟之义而摄佛道。

与相关概念的关系

「八法」与「八正道」「八解脱」「八大人觉」等概念关系密切,皆以「八」为数摄法:八圣道以「正」贯八支,八大人觉以「觉」贯八项,八解脱以解脱为宗,世八法则为世间染污之源,与出世间法相对而立。八邪为八正之逐项对应,《十住毘婆沙论》明确标举应疾远离。《大般涅槃经(南本)》中阿难持经之八法,与过去诸佛侍者弟子共通之德相相连,显示其非一时一地之独具。

代表性原文引用

《长阿含经》:「云何八觉法?谓世八法。」

《长阿含经》:「云何八修法?谓贤圣八道。」

《大般涅槃经(南本)》:「莲花者,即是如来;不污者,如来不为世间八法之所染污。是故,号佛为世间解。」

《大般涅槃经(南本)》:「阿难比丘具足八法,能具足持十二部经。何等为八?一者、信根坚固,二者、其心质直,三者、身无病苦,四者、常勤精进,五者、具足念心,六者、心无憍慢,七者、成就定慧,八者、具足从闻生智。」

《十住毘婆沙论》:「菩萨有八法,能集一切功德:一者、大悲,二者、坚心,三者、智慧,四者、方便,五者、不放逸,六者、勤精进,七者、常摄念,八者、善知识。」

《十住毘婆沙论》:「复有八法能摄佛道,所谓八大人觉:少欲、知足、远离、精进、念、定、慧、乐不戏论。」

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》對「八法」的論述,主要採取數目分類與功能分類兩種方式。其一,在「如來說八正法」的總標之下,連續列出四組八項法義:世八法、八解脫、八聖道與八人;並將它們視為應共同撰集的正法,目的在防止諍訟、使梵行久立,且令天、人獲得安益。此處「八法」不是單一固定名目,而是以「八」為數目框架,統攝性質不同的多組法義。

世八法的原文定型為「利、衰、毀、譽、稱、譏、苦、樂」。在另一段依功能區分的問答中,這一組又被稱為「八覺法」,經文直言:「云何八覺法?謂世八法。」因此,本經記錄此組時所用的核心術語是「世八法」,並在特定分類脈絡中以「八覺法」標示其功能。

八解脫依次為:色觀色;內無色想觀外色;淨解脫;度色想、滅瞋恚想而住空處;度空處而住識處;度識處而住不用處;度不用處而住有想無想處;度有想無想處而住想知滅。本經在此使用「不用處」「有想無想處」「想知滅」等語,這些正是整理異譯名時應保留的本經用詞。

八聖道列為「正見、正志、正語、正業、正命、正方便、正念、正定」。另一段則稱之為「賢聖八道」,並歸入「八修法」:「云何八修法?謂賢聖八道。」尤其值得注意的是,本經此處用「正志」與「正方便」,而不是以其他譯名取代;兩段所列八支完全相應。

八人依次列為「須陀洹向、須陀洹、斯陀含向、斯陀含、阿那含向、阿那含、阿羅漢向、阿羅漢」,即以四種果位各分向、果而成八人。本經直接使用上述音譯名稱,未在此段另作義譯或教義申論。

在功能分類中,本經又提出「八滅法」,內容為八邪:邪見、邪思、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定;它們與八支正道形成逐項相對的邪法系列。本經同樣使用「邪思」「邪方便」這一組術語形式。

此外,本經稱「八退法」為「八懈怠法」,以比丘因乞食不得、得食過足、已作執事或將作執事等情形,藉口疲極、身重或預先休息,因而不肯精勤於未得、未獲、未證之法。此處的「八法」側重修行退失的具體因緣,而非抽象名目;所引原文塊呈現其前數例,未完整展示全部八項,故不宜據此補足其餘內容。

另有敘事稱某王「成就八法」,但所引段落旋即轉入大臣以十六事開解王意,沒有在此原文塊中完整列出該王八法。因此只能確認本經亦在王者敘事中使用「成就八法」之說,不能由現有文字確定八項的完整內容。

大般涅槃經(南本)T0375 · 涅槃部

《大般涅槃經(南本)》論「八法」一詞,依不同經文脈絡而展開為數項內容有別之法義集合,須分別觀之。

其一,「世間八法」。此經於釋「世間解」義時,先以五陰、五欲立「世間」之名(按:此經用「五陰」而非「五蘊」,與一般部派用語一致),繼而以蓮華為喻,云:「蓮花者,即是如來;不污者,如來不為世間八法之所染污。是故,號佛為世間解。」 將「世間八法」視為能染污世間者,如來獨能不染,故名「世間解」。此八法為固定術語,經中未逐項列其名相,但以「世間八法」總稱貫通文義。於記述尼乾陀若提子之段落,亦稱此師「世間八法所不能污」,足見「世間八法」於本經已為通識,並不限於佛陀一身。

其二,「八種不可思議」。經中述阿難事佛二十餘年,具足八種不可思議之事:一者、初不隨佛受別請食;二者、初不受佛陳故衣服;三者、至佛所時終不非時;四者、雖具足煩惱而隨佛出入,見諸女人及天龍女不生欲心;五者、佛所說十二部經一經於耳曾不再問;六者、未得知他心智而常知如來所入諸定;七者、未得願智而能了知眾生到如來所現得果報之差別;八者、如來所有祕密之言悉能了知。 此八項皆就阿難事佛之具體行誼而立,屬事相層面,與下條抽象德目之「八法」相對。

其三,正以「八法」為名者。經云:「阿難比丘具足八法,能具足持十二部經。何等為八?一者、信根堅固,二者、其心質直,三者、身無病苦,四者、常勤精進,五者、具足念心,六者、心無憍慢,七者、成就定慧,八者、具足從聞生智。」 此處以「八法」為持十二部經之資糧,八項皆為修行德目,並明指此八法為「能具足持」正法之因。復云:「毘婆尸佛侍者弟子名阿叔迦,亦復具足如是八法;尸棄如來侍者弟子名差摩迦羅、毘舍浮佛侍者弟子名優波扇陀、迦羅鳩村馱佛侍者弟子名曰跋提、迦那含牟尼佛侍者弟子名曰蘇坻、迦葉佛侍者弟子名葉婆蜜多,皆亦具足如是八法。」 顯示此八法非阿難一人之獨具,而是過去諸佛侍者弟子共通之德相。

綜觀本經,「八法」一詞隨所依經文脈絡不同,所指亦隨之轉變:或指染污世間之「世間八法」,或指阿難事佛之「八種不可思議」,或指持十二部經所需之八項德目。經文本身未嘗將三者會通為同一法義,而是各隨文勢獨立成立。此即「依經論特定脈絡組成八項法義」之具體表現。

十住毘婆沙論T1521 · 釋經論部

《十住毘婆沙論》中「八法」一詞,並非指固定一組法義,而是隨經文脈絡而組成不同之八項內容,茲就本文所見諸組條列如下。

一、能集一切功德之八法。文云:「菩薩有八法,能集一切功德:一者、大悲,二者、堅心,三者、智慧,四者、方便,五者、不放逸,六者、勤精進,七者、常攝念,八者、善知識。是故初發心者,疾行八法,如救頭然,然後當修諸餘功德。」此八法為初發心菩薩應疾行之要目,論中特別以「堅心第一」加以標舉,謂堅心菩薩見地獄、畜生、餓鬼、天、人、阿修羅中受諸苦惱時,能生大悲而無怖畏,發願度脫;其序以大悲為先、堅心居次。又此八法亦為「聲聞」四雙八輩所依,故同為二乘聖位之因。

二、成就初地之八法。文云菩薩若「厚種善根,善行於諸行,善集諸資用,善供養諸佛;善知識所護,具足於深心,悲心念眾生,信解無上法。具此八法已,當自發願言……轉世間道,入出世上道,是以得初地,此地名歡喜。」此八項含善根、修行、資用、供佛、善知識護念、深心、大悲、信解,具足即得入歡喜地。

三、能攝佛道之八法,即「八大人覺」。文云:「復有八法能攝佛道,所謂八大人覺:少欲、知足、遠離、精進、念、定、慧、樂不戲論。」此八項以少欲居首、不戲論居末,攝盡佛道修行之要。

四、應疾遠離之八法。文云:「復有八法應疾遠離:一、邪見,二、邪思惟,三、邪語,四、邪業,五、邪命,六、邪方便,七、邪念,八、邪定。」此即八邪,與八正相對,為修行者所當疾速遠離者。

五、世間利衰等八法。文云:「利衰等八法,處世必應受。亦念過去世,空受無量苦,何況為佛道,而當不受耶。」此處「利衰等八法」即世間八法(利、衰、毀、譽、稱、譏、苦、樂),本論謂行者處世必應領受此等八法,當念過去已空受無量世間之苦,何況為求佛道而當有所退怯。

綜觀本論,「八法」一詞具高度隨機性與結構性,常用以歸納特定修行要目,無論攝善、攝佛、遠離、成位,皆以「八」之數編列法義,便於受持誦念;而本論於「八大人覺」一題所用名相,與他經常見之「八正道」分際不同,乃取覺悟之義而攝佛道,須特加辨明。