Dharma · AI Companion

全身

sarva-kāya

禅门语,谓十方世界即当处全体现成、身境不二之悟境(「百尺竿头须进步,十方世界是全身」);不含高僧入灭肉身不散之全身舍利义。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Welcome to a deep dive into a term that sounds deceptively simple. When you hear “全身” (Whole Body), your first thought is probably of a physical corpse preserved in a pagoda, or maybe your own skin-and-bones container. But in the Chan (Zen) tradition, this word takes a radical, mind-bending turn. It stops referring to *your* body entirely and instead points to the entire universe as your body.

Let’s be precise from the start. The classical sources carry two distinct meanings. The first is the historical record: eminent monks whose bodies did not decay after death (*全身舍利*, whole-body relics). The *Jingde Transmission of the Lamp* (*景德傳燈錄*) records these events meticulously—a master who “manifested spiritual transformations and entered nirvāṇa, and the assembly raised a jeweled stupa to seal his whole body”; another whose disciples opened his shrine three years later to find him “whole and undispersed, his countenance solemn, his hair and beard still growing”. This is the *literal* whole body.

But the second meaning—the one we will focus on—is the *metaphorical* and *realized* meaning. It is found in the famous verse: “百尺竿頭須進步,十方世界是全身” — *“At the top of the hundred-foot pole, you must take a step further; then the ten directions of the world are your Whole Body.”*

Here, “全身” is not about flesh. It is about the radical non-duality of self and world. It means that the entire universe—every mountain, every river, every pixel on your screen—is your complete, undivided body. You are not a discrete entity *inside* the world; you *are* the world, fully present, with nothing missing.

This is not a philosophical abstraction. It is a lived state of awakening. Let’s unpack it step by step.


生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

Let’s ground this in a contemporary scene: Monday morning, rush hour, you are crammed into a subway car, scrolling through your phone.

Step 1: The “Half-Person” (半人) Diagnosis. The verse from *Jingde Transmission of the Lamp* asks: *“Why are you only half a person? Because you know the path through the road, so you are not the Whole Body”*. Look at yourself on that subway. Where are you? Your eyes are on the screen. Your mind is in a meeting that happened yesterday or an email you need to send tonight. Your awareness is fragmented—a sliver of attention on the crowd, a sliver on the phone, a sliver on your anxiety. You are a “半人” (half-person). You are not fully present anywhere. Your “body” is a phantom assembled from disjointed thoughts and sensory fragments.

Step 2: The Top of the Pole (百尺竿頭). Suppose you put the phone down. You focus. You take a deep breath. You feel your feet on the floor. You are now “present.” In Chan terms, you’ve climbed to the top of the hundred-foot pole. You are stable, unmoving, self-contained. *But the verse says this is not yet real.* “雖然得入未為真” — *“Although you have entered, this is not yet true.”* Why? Because you are still a discrete “self” *on top of* a pole, separate from the crowd, the noise, the train. You are a meditator in a bubble, not the Whole Body.

Step 3: The Necessary Step Forward (須進步). What is the “step further”? It is not climbing higher. It is falling off the pole. It is letting go of the last vestige of separation. It is the *“全身放下”* (Whole Body letting go) from the *Hongzhi Record*. You stop trying to be a calm island in a chaotic sea. You drop the distinction between “me who is meditating” and “the noise that disturbs me.”

In that instant, what happens? The crowd, the screeching wheels, the fluorescent lights, the smell of damp coats—none of it is an *obstacle* to your body anymore. It *is* your body. The *Human Eye* (*人天眼目*) says: *“全身直下露堂堂”* — *“The Whole Body, directly beneath, appears openly and clearly”*. The noise is not outside your awareness; it *is* your awareness. The *Human Eye* uses the image: *“良哉觀世音,全身入荒草”* — *“Excellent, Avalokiteśvara, entering the Whole Body into the wild weeds”*. The “wild weeds” are the messy, unglamorous moments of daily life—the dirty subway floor, the spilled coffee. The Whole Body is not found *away* from these weeds; it is found *as* these weeds. They are not blocking the sacred; they *are* the sacred manifesting.

Step 4: The Distinction between 通身, 遍身, and 全身. Here is where the classical texts demand surgical precision. *Hongzhi’s Record* differentiates “全身” (Whole Body) from “通身” (Pervasive Body/Function) and “遍身” (Ubiquitous Body).

- 全身 (Whole Body): This is the *static, complete presence* of the ten directions. It is *being* the entire world. - 通身 (Pervasive Function): This is the *dynamic, responsive* aspect. *“應處不將來,通身能變態”* — *“In the place of response, nothing is brought forth; the Pervasive Body can transform”*. This is when you react to a situation perfectly, without premeditation. Think of a masterful jazz musician improvising—the music flows, unplanned, from the totality of the moment. Their entire being *is* the response. - 遍身 (Ubiquitous Body): This is the *universal extension* aspect. The text asks a tricky question: *“How far apart are 遍身 and 通身?”* The answer: *“Only a hair’s breadth apart, yet that becomes ten thousand miles”*.

In your daily life: When you are *fully present* and the world is your body, that is 全身. When you *respond* to a colleague’s question with total clarity and compassion, without a split second of self-conscious calculation, that is 通身. When you realize that this responsiveness is not limited to this one moment but is the very nature of every atom, every cell, everywhere—that is 遍身.

The warning is crucial: “only a hair’s breadth, yet ten thousand miles.” Why? Because the moment you *conceptualize* these distinctions— “Oh, I am experiencing 通身 now!”—you have created a split between the observer and the observed. You have fallen off the pole into the ditch of “half-person” again. The text says to “push off the hair’s breadth,” and then “you will match that time”. It is a living, non-conceptual realization, not a taxonomy to be applied.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need This)

We are living through a crisis of fragmentation. Our attention is sliced into nanoseconds by algorithms. Our identities are fractured across multiple platforms. We are told to be “authentic” yet we perform different selves for work, family, and social media. The *Human Eye* describes the Whole Body as *“事貫萬有,纖塵不漏”* — *“Matters penetrate all beings, not even a speck of dust leaks”*.

In our modern experience, *everything leaks*. Our attention leaks. Our energy leaks. Our sense of self leaks. We feel like we are constantly losing bits of ourselves to the scroll, to the inbox, to the noise.

The concept of 全身 is the ultimate antidote to this entropy. It is the radical claim that there is nothing to lose because there is no separate self to lose. When you realize “十方世界是全身” (The ten directions are the Whole Body), you stop trying to protect your boundaries because you have realized that boundaries were an illusion.

Consider the algorithmic feed. The algorithm shows you a news item about a war, then a cute cat, then a political argument. It is designed to fragment you into reactions—outrage, tenderness, anxiety. If you live as a “半人,” you are just a puppet being pulled by these strings. But if you practice “全身,” you see that the war, the cat, the argument—they are all *appearing within* your awareness. They are not *other* things invading your space; they *are* your space. You are not the small self *reacting* to the feed; you are the open totality *containing* the feed.

This doesn’t mean you become passive. On the contrary, the “通身” (Pervasive Function) becomes *more* precise. Because you are not wasting energy on defending a false self, your responses become clear, compassionate, and spontaneous. You act without the static of ego interference. The verse says, *“化機妙應頭頭准,手眼通身不著謾”* — *“The transformative capacity responds accurately in every case; hands and eyes pervade the body, without deception”*. You act with total integrity because there is no gap between your inner state and your outer action.

We need this because we are exhausted by the burden of being a “self.” We are tired of maintaining the boundary between “me” and “not me.” The teaching of 全身 is an invitation to rest in a wholeness that was never broken—to realize that we have been a “half-person” only because we believed in the fragments, and to take that step off the pole into the boundless, fully-present body of reality.


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: “全身” means the physical body is indestructible or must be preserved. This is the *literal* reading found in the historical records of the *Jingde Transmission of the Lamp*. While that is a valid meaning for *relics*, it is *not* the Chan philosophical meaning. The verse explicitly says “十方世界是全身” (The ten directions are the Whole Body). If the “Whole Body” is the universe, then your physical corpse is just one tiny, temporary phenomenon within it. The philosophical 全身 cannot be contained in a stupa; it *is* the stupa, the mountain, and the sky. When reading Chan texts, context is everything. A monk’s preserved body is a *symbol* of realization, but the *reality* of 全身 is the non-dual presence of all things.

Misreading 2: “全身” is a mystical expansion of your ego to encompass the universe. You might think, “I am a small body, and I expand my awareness to include the whole world.” This is still a dualistic model—there is a “me” who does the expanding, and a “world” that gets included. The Chan teaching is not about expansion; it is about *seeing through the illusion of the boundary itself*. The *Human Eye* says, *“妙體繇來不覆藏”* — *“The wondrous substance has never been hidden”*. You don’t *make* yourself whole; you *discover* that you were always whole. The “step forward” is not an action you perform; it is a giving up of the effort to remain a separate self. *Hongzhi* says: *“全身放下是全身”* — *“The Whole Body letting go is the Whole Body”*. It is not “I let go and *then* get the Whole Body.” The letting go itself *is* the Whole Body.

Misreading 3: Confusing 全身 (Whole Body), 通身 (Pervasive Function), and 遍身 (Ubiquitous Body). These are not synonyms. The texts are extremely precise about their differences. - 全身 emphasizes the *substance*—the static, complete reality of the ten directions. - 通身 emphasizes the *function*—the dynamic, responsive capability that arises from that reality. - 遍身 emphasizes the *extent*—the universal, seamless application of that function.

They are “a hair’s breadth apart, but ten thousand miles” if you try to grasp them as separate concepts. In practice, they are one unified reality viewed from different angles. It is like looking at a sphere: its mass (全身), its rotation (通身), and its presence in space (遍身) are one thing, but if you focus only on the rotation and ignore the mass, you miss the truth.

Misreading 4: “全身” is a state of cosmic bliss that you must strive to achieve. This is the most dangerous misreading because it turns a realization into a goal, which only strengthens the ego. The *Human Eye* says, *“觸處現成誰辨的”* — *“It is realized at every point of contact; who can discriminate it?”*. It is not something to be achieved in the future; it is *already present right now*, in this very moment, in these very weeds of your life. The “white light” shining from every speck of dust (*塵塵俱放白毫光*) is not a future reward; it is the nature of this moment if you stop obstructing it with your ideas of past and future.


Conclusion: The Step Off the Pole

The teaching of 全身 is the most liberating and terrifying idea in Chan Buddhism. It tells you that the boundaries you have spent your entire life defending—the skin, the ego, the nation, the self—are ultimately arbitrary. The “Whole Body” is not yours; you *are* it.

The classical texts use the metaphor of the hundred-foot pole. You have climbed to the very top. You are balanced, stable, accomplished. And then you are told to take a step further. There is nowhere to step. It is a cliff. You must fall.

But in that falling, you discover that the “falling” is actually the most grounded, whole, and complete moment of your existence. You land in the ten directions. You are the ten directions. You are the subway car, the phone, the crying baby, and the quiet breath. Nothing is missing. Nothing has ever been missing.

This is 全身—not a body you have, but the Body you are.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「全身」一词于汉传佛教典籍中兼含两重意涵:其一指高僧入灭后肉身完整不散、得以入塔供奉之遗体,为修行圆满之瑞相;其二指禅门所喻究竟证悟之境界,谓十方世界与己身不二、当下本自圆满显露、不假外求。前者见于史传部之纪实,后者见于诸宗部之诗偈颂语。各经对此二义各有侧重,并无统一裁决。

二、主要阐述

在史传层面,《景德传灯录》屡载祖师付法之后肉身不坏、全身入塔之事。例如某尊者付法已,「即现神变湛然圆寂。众兴宝塔以閟全身」;另一尊者攀树而化,众议「将奉全身于高原建塔」;某禅师于淳化初安坐而逝,「三年后门人迁塔,发龛覩师全身不散,容仪俨若髭发仍长」;布袋和尚化后,「今岳林寺大殿东堂全身见存」。此皆以「全身」指完整不散之遗体,承袭中土佛教全身舍利之传统。

在譬喻层面,《景德传灯录》诗偈中以「全身」喻究竟证悟之境界。偈云:「百丈竿头不动人,虽然得入未为真。百丈竿头须进步,十方世界是全身」,谓百丈竿头更须进步,则十方世界即是自身之全身,非仅一介血肉之躯。另一偈云:「解擘当胸箭,因何只半人?为从途路晓,所以不全身」,以「半人」对比「全身」,喻指行人虽有所悟,犹未臻究竟,故「不全身」——尚未圆满证入。

《宏智禅师广录》承袭此喻,更深入阐发。其核心表述为「百尺竿头须进步,十方世界是全身」,指出即使已至竿头仍须进步,进步之处并非另立一境,以「朗州山澧州水」及「四海五湖王化里」作答,使「全身」呈现为十方世界及目前山水皆不欠缺的现成境界。本经又以「全身放下是全身」直陈其义,「放下」并非放下之后另得一个全身,而是全身放下之际即是全身;下句「一点独灵常了了」,同时写出不滞于身相而灵明常照的一面。本经尚以「灵涵万象兮彼不遗余,坐断十方兮我无渗漏」描写相应境况,虽未直接使用「全身」二字,其「不遗余」「无渗漏」正构成完整、周遍而无欠缺的原文侧面。

《人天眼目》论「全身」,重在显示完整身体并非由外在补足,而是在当下本自显露、触处现成。其核心语句为「全身直下露堂堂」,「直下」标明不待转折与寻求,「露堂堂」则写其明白呈现、无所遮蔽;下句又说「妙体繇来不覆藏」,进一步指出此一完整之身的妙体从来不曾隐覆。本经以「触处现成」刻画全身的无欠缺性,所触所遇之处皆当处已然成就,「谁辨的」则显示它不以分别辨认为成立条件;末句「尘尘俱放白毫光」,把这种现成推至一一微尘:每一尘皆放光明,没有任何一处被排除在全身的显现之外。另以「事贯万有,纤尘不漏」说明完整性的范围,「全机」是本经与「全身」相互照映的用语。本经亦用具体景象呈示「全身」:「秋江清浅时,白鹭和烟岛」先铺陈清浅秋江、白鹭与烟岛,随后赞叹「良哉观世音,全身入荒草」,「荒草」并未成为遮断全身的障碍,反而正是全身进入、呈现之处,与「触处现成」相应。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

此概念未见于不同译本之异译问题,盖「全身」一词主要通行于汉传禅宗文献之中。就不同部类而言:

- 《景德传灯录》(史传部·《景德傳燈錄》)兼含史实与譬喻两层,以「全身」记载肉身不朽之现象,并以「全身」喻指十方即己之最高境界; - 《宏智禅师广录》(诸宗部·《宏智禪師廣錄》)以「全身」为十方世界现成与全体放下之境界,并明列相关术语「通身」「遍身」「不通身」「手眼通身」等; - 《人天眼目》(诸宗部·《人天眼目》)以「全身直下露堂堂」「全身入荒草」为核心表述,相关用语另有「妙体」「全机」「现成」「万有」「万象」「尘尘」。

各经用词各有侧重:《景德传灯录》侧重肉身与悟境之双重记载;《宏智禅师广录》侧重全体放下、十方现成与通身遍身之分际;《人天眼目》侧重当下显露、触处现成、不覆不藏。

四、与相关概念的关系

与「全身」相近而相关的术语,在《宏智禅师广录》中有「通身」与「遍身」。本经说「应处不将来,通身能变态」,着重应处而现、随用而变。当问「遍身通身,相去多少」时,答曰「只隔一丝头,便成千万里」;若能「推得一丝头」,便「恰与那时合」。本经明列「遍身」与「通身」两种术语,既指出其间极微细的分际,又警示一丝之隔即可成为千万里。颂语中「通身」尤其与手眼、应缘、妙触相连:「对缘手眼通身是,应物机轮转处幽」、「妙触宣明渠具眼,纤尘不受我通身」、「化机妙应头头准,手眼通身不着谩」。另有一段古则明言「通身不通身边事」,但洞山随即否定此一套取法,说「不是者个道理」,而归结为「如如遍不如如遍道理」。

在《人天眼目》中,与「全身」相互照映的用语为「全机」:「全机」着重完整作用贯彻万有,而「全身」着重完整身体当下显露;原文以「无咎」表明其全体运行并无缺失。另「妙体」指其从来不覆藏的一面。

就《宏智禅师广录》而言,「全身」偏于十方世界现成与全体放下;「通身」多见于应处、变态、手眼及妙触;「遍身」在问答中与「通身」并举,原文明确说二者只隔「一丝头」,三者相近而不可径行混同。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《景德传灯录》:「即现神变湛然圆寂。众兴宝塔以閟全身。」 2. 《景德传灯录》:「三年后门人迁塔。发龛覩师全身不散。容仪俨若髭发仍长。」 3. 《景德传灯录》:「今岳林寺大殿东堂全身见存。」 4. 《景德传灯录》:「百丈竿头不动人,虽然得入未为真。百丈竿头须进步,十方世界是全身。」 5. 《景德传灯录》:「解擘当胸箭,因何只半人?为从途路晓,所以不全身。」 6. 《宏智禅师广录》:「百尺竿头坐底人,虽然得入未为真。百尺竿头须进步,十方世界是全身。」 7. 《宏智禅师广录》:「全身放下是全身。一点独灵常了了。」 8. 《宏智禅师广录》:「问:遍身通身,相去多少?答:只隔一丝头,便成千万里。」 9. 《人天眼目》:「全身直下露堂堂,妙体繇来不覆藏。触处现成谁辨的,尘尘俱放白毫光。」 10. 《人天眼目》:「良哉观世音,全身入荒草。」

By SutraAI-generated

宏智禪師廣錄T2001 · 諸宗部

《宏智禪師廣錄》論「全身」,最鮮明的表述是「百尺竿頭須進步,十方世界是全身」。此語置於「百尺竿頭坐底人,雖然得入未為真」之後,指出即使已至竿頭,仍須進步;進步之處並非另立一境,而以「朗州山澧州水」及「四海五湖王化裡」作答,使「全身」呈現為十方世界及目前山水皆不欠缺的現成境界。

本經又以「全身放下是全身」直陳其義。「放下」並不是放下之後另得一個全身,而是全身放下之際即是全身;下句「一點獨靈常了了」,則同時寫出不滯於身相而靈明常照的一面。此處兩次使用「全身」,形成即放即全、無所增減的語勢。

與「全身」相近而反覆出現的用詞,是「通身」與「遍身」。本經說大悲手眼之作用為「無心能作用,作用自無心」,又說「應處不將來,通身能變態」;所謂通身,著重應處而現、隨用而變,並非由心預先攜來。當問「遍身通身,相去多少」時,答曰「只隔一絲頭,便成千萬里」;若能「推得一絲頭」,便「恰與那時合」。可見本經明列「遍身」與「通身」兩種術語,既指出其間極微細的分際,又警示一絲之隔即可成為千萬里。

另一段古則亦明言「通身不通身邊事」,但洞山隨即否定此一套取法,說「不是者箇道理」,而歸結為「如如遍不如如遍道理」。因此,本經雖記錄「通身」「不通身」的問法,卻不把它當作可以替代原則的固定解釋;原文保留的是對名相套合的拒絕,以及「如如遍」「不如如遍」這組自身語彙。

在頌語中,「通身」尤其與手眼、應緣、妙觸相連。「對緣手眼通身是,應物機輪轉處幽」,以通身為對緣時全體皆是手眼,並由機輪轉動寫其應物之妙。「妙觸宣明渠具眼,纖塵不受我通身」,則把通身置於妙觸、具眼與不受纖塵的脈絡中,顯出全體明淨、不容微塵黏著的一面。「化機妙應頭頭准,手眼通身不著謾」,又以「頭頭准」表明處處妙應,以「手眼通身」表明全體皆具照用,且不落虛謾。

本經尚以「靈涵萬象兮彼不遺餘,坐斷十方兮我無滲漏」描寫相應境況:一方面萬象皆涵而無所遺餘,另一方面十方坐斷而自身無有滲漏。雖此段未直接使用「全身」二字,其「不遺餘」「無滲漏」正構成完整、周遍而無欠缺的原文側面。

就多譯名歸一而言,本經直接使用的核心名稱是「全身」,相關而不可逕行混同的術語則有「通身」「遍身」「不通身」「手眼通身」及「通身能變態」。其中「全身」偏於十方世界現成與全體放下;「通身」多見於應處、變態、手眼及妙觸;「遍身」則在問答中與「通身」並舉,原文明確說二者只隔「一絲頭」,故記錄時宜保留本經各自的用詞與細微分際。

人天眼目T2006 · 諸宗部

《人天眼目》論「全身」,重在顯示完整身體並非由外在補足,而是在當下本自顯露、觸處現成。其核心語句為「全身直下露堂堂」,「直下」標明不待轉折與尋求,「露堂堂」則寫其明白呈現、無所遮蔽;下句又說「妙體繇來不覆藏」,進一步指出此一完整之身的妙體從來不曾隱覆。故本經不是把「全身」說成尚待成就之物,而是以本來顯露、不覆不藏為其基本面貌。

本經又以「觸處現成」刻畫全身的無欠缺性。所觸所遇之處,皆不是局部線索或殘缺片段,而是當處已然成就;「誰辨的」則顯示它不以分別辨認為成立條件。末句「塵塵俱放白毫光」,把這種現成推至一一微塵:每一塵皆放光明,沒有任何一處被排除在全身的顯現之外。由此,「全身」兼具當下、遍處與無遺的意涵。

另一段以「事貫萬有,纖塵不漏」說明完整性的範圍。「貫萬有」表示其貫通一切現象,「纖塵不漏」則特別從最細微處申明毫無遺漏;接着說「萬象森羅,全機無咎」,將繁多萬象視為整體機用的呈現。「全機」是本經在相關語境中與「全身」相互照映的用語:前者着重完整作用貫徹萬有,後者着重完整身體當下顯露;原文並以「無咎」表明其全體運行並無缺失。

本經亦用具體景象呈示「全身」:「秋江清淺時,白鷺和烟島」先鋪陳清淺秋江、白鷺與煙島,隨後讚歎「良哉觀世音,全身入荒草」。此處不以抽象界說收束,而以「全身入」寫完整投入荒草之中;「荒草」並未成為遮斷全身的障礙,反而正是全身進入、呈現之處。這一表述與「觸處現成」相應,突出全身不離具體境遇而現。

在術語形式上,本經直接使用「全身」,並以「全身直下露堂堂」及「全身入荒草」兩種句式加以表達;相關用語另有「妙體」、「現成」、「全機」、「萬有」、「萬象」與「塵塵」。其中「全身」是概念本名,「妙體」指其從來不覆藏的一面,「全機」則表現其貫徹萬有而纖塵不漏的一面。就所給原文而言,本經沒有另以其他名稱替代「全身」,也沒有提出需要與別經異名歸一的另一譯稱。

景德傳燈錄T2076 · 史傳部

《景德傳燈錄》為史傳部之著作,宋道原纂。書中多次出現「全身」一詞,綜觀所引原文,可歸納為兩大面向:其一為肉身不壞、全身入塔之史實記載,其二為禪門詩偈中以「全身」喻究竟證悟之境界。

一、肉身不朽,全身入塔

《景德傳燈錄》屢載祖師付法之後,肉身完整不散,弟子為之建塔供奉。某尊者付法已,「即現神變湛然圓寂。眾興寶塔以閟全身」(),此處「全身」即尊者入滅後完整之遺體。另一尊者攀樹而化,眾議「將奉全身於高原建塔」,然「眾力不能舉,即就樹下起塔」(),亦以「全身」指完整不散之遺體。此類記載最詳者,見於某禪師之記述:師於淳化初「安坐而逝。塔于本山。三年後門人遷塔。發龕覩師全身不散。容儀儼若髭髮仍長」(),三年之間肉身未腐、鬚髮猶生,「全身不散」四字尤為關鍵。又布袋和尚化後,「今嶽林寺大殿東堂全身見存」(),亦指肉身至今完整保存於岳林寺。綜合觀之,該經承襲中土佛教全身舍利之傳統,以「全身」指稱高僧入滅後肉身完整、得以入塔供奉之遺體,並視之為修行圓滿之瑞相。

二、禪門詩偈中「全身」之喻義

除史傳記述外,《景德傳燈錄》亦收錄禪師詩偈,其中「全身」一詞被賦予不同之喻義。偈云:「百丈竿頭不動人雖然得入未為真百丈竿頭須進步十方世界是全身」(),此「十方世界是全身」意謂:百丈竿頭更須進步,則十方世界即是自身之全身,非僅一介血肉之軀。另一偈云:「解擘當胸箭因何只半人為從途路曉所以不全身」(),以「半人」對比「全身」,喻指行人雖有所悟,猶未臻究竟,故「不全身」——尚未圓滿證入。此二處「全身」非指肉身不壞,而是借喻究竟圓滿之悟境,或十方與己身不二之境界。

三、結語

綜上所述,《景德傳燈錄》中「全身」一詞兼具史實與譬喻雙重意涵。就史傳而言,該經以「全身」記載高僧入滅後肉身不朽之現象;就禪詩而言,該經以「全身」喻指十方即己、圓滿證入之最高境界。同一詞彙於不同語境下意涵各異,此正該經兼顧紀實與收錄詩偈所呈現之特色。

Related