Dharma · AI Companion

vāc

口所发出的言辞与言说AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In modern understanding, "mouth" (口) is often narrowed down to a physiological organ—the mouth used for eating, speaking, and producing sounds; or it is reduced to a simple social tool. Yet in the profound vision of the Buddha's teaching (the path of liberation, 解脫道, *vimokṣa-mārga*), "mouth" (Sanskrit: *vāc*) is an extremely pivotal concept. It is both the valve where body and mind converge, the core channel through which karma (業力, *kamma*, "karmic force") is fabricated and emitted, and the touchstone for practice, realization, and liberation.

To precisely grasp the place of "mouth" on the path of liberation, one must break through the shallow understanding of it as a "mere vocal organ" and comprehend it fully through the following four classical levels:

1. The Psychological Mechanism Level: Verbal Formation (口行, *Vacī-saṅkhāra*)—"With applied thought and sustained thought, therefore speech arises"

Among the three formations (三行, *trividha-saṃskārāḥ*, bodily, verbal, and mental), the scriptures give an extremely precise psychological definition of the "verbal formation": the *Saṃyuktāgama* (《雜阿含經》) clearly states that "verbal formation" is "with applied thought (覺, *Vitakka*) and sustained thought (觀, *Vicāra*)" [6593].

* **Applied thought (覺, *Vitakka*, coarse directing / *vitarka*)**: the mind's initial grasping, orienting, and projecting toward an object. * **Sustained thought (觀, *Vicāra*, fine examining / *vicāra*)**: the mind's continuous roaming, investigating, and fine deliberation on that object.

This means: speech is by no means an accidental physical vibration of lips and vocal cords; it is the direct external manifestation and extension of the mind's applied and sustained thought [6593]. A person must first undergo the fabrication and brewing of applied and sustained thought within the mind before it is uttered as language [6593]. In Mahāyāna scriptures such as the *Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta-sūtra* (《大方等大集經》), this "applied and sustained thought" is further connected with the "in-and-out breath" in meditation and the physiological operation of the wind element [14561]—a breath exhaled, the mind floating between coarse and fine, and speech is born. Thus, the mouth is the "mind"'s first spokesperson in the material world.

2. The Moral and Karmic Level: Verbal Karma (口業, *vāg-karma*) and the "Axe in the Mouth"

As one of the six sense faculties (六根, *ṣaḍ-indriya*) and the medium of the three karmas (三業, *trīṇi karmāṇi*, body, speech, mind), the mouth has a dual opening: one turns inward to swallow (craving delicious tastes), the other turns outward to emit (good, neutral, and evil speech) [16515].

If the mouth is not guarded ("not restrained"), and one craves sensory tastes and the venting of speech, then "the mouth-root's hundred-and-eight offenses" (口本罪百八行) will be bred [16515]. The scriptures reveal an extremely profound karmic mechanism: the delicious tastes we savor in the mouth, the words we speak or hear, physically perish in an instant; yet in their "perishing there is the hundred-and-eight that will be reborn and undergone in future lives, not perishing" [16588]—the clinging and harm born from the mouth, their psychological imprints (karmic seeds), continue to ferment in the ālayavijñāna (阿賴耶識, "store consciousness") or in the flow of saṃsāra, summoning future fruits of suffering.

Regarding harsh speech, slander, and rumor-mongering, the scriptures give a startling warning: "人出生世间,斧在口中生,还自斩其身,斯由恶言说。" (*"When a person is born into the world, an axe is born in the mouth; it turns and cuts one's own body—this comes from evil speech."*) [12973, 16906, 16908] The power of language is like a boomerang blade: on the surface it strikes others, but in the very moment of utterance, it has already lacerated one's own mind-nature and summoned the grave karmic retribution of present unhappiness and even future descent into the evil destinies and hell [12973, 16906, 16908].

3. The Level of the Buddha's Qualities: Perfect Verbal Karma That Follows Wisdom

Unlike ordinary beings' speech, which is filled with greed, hatred, and delusion, the Tathāgata's (如來) three karmas dwell in complete stillness [11703], and his "verbal karma" is entirely "following wisdom" (隨智慧行) [11728].

The Tathāgata's speech is not only faultless but endowed with extremely specific concrete qualities: true speech, easily understood speech, easily known speech, gentle speech, authentic speech, blissful speech, speech still in body, speech still in mind, speech that destroys Māra, speech that refutes false views, and so on [11728]. The Buddha's mouth is a pure vessel for liberating sentient beings and proclaiming the "eighty-four thousand dharma-collections" (八萬四千法聚) [13794]; his voice is like the Brahmā voice, the kalaviṅka bird's voice, and the sound of the great ocean tide, manifesting the ultimate beauty and supreme state that language can attain after being completely cleansed by wisdom and compassion [11728].

4. The Epistemological Level: The Unity of Opposites Between "Speech" (語) and "Meaning" (義)

The *Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta-sūtra* makes an exquisitely subtle analysis of the limitations and transcendence of speech:

* Speech (語): refers to the expression and proclamation of language—"being able to speak the eighty-four thousand dharma-collections is called speech" (能说八万四千法聚是名为语) [13794]. It is the finger pointing at the moon that guides one to liberation, the symbolic system that constructs the teaching. * Meaning (義): refers to the ultimate reality and personally realized liberation that language points toward—"knowing that all letters and words cannot be spoken is called meaning" (知诸文字不可宣说是名为义) [13794].

The mouth can emit eighty-four thousand dharma-gates, but if one clings to the verbal symbols in the mouth, one "dies beneath the sentence"; true "meaning" is the unconditioned reality beyond all language and letters, which cannot be spoken [13794]. The function of the mouth is to reveal "meaning" through "speech," ultimately allowing one to cross the river and abandon the raft, to witness the ineffable reality [13794].


Walking Through It in Daily Life

To keep these concepts from becoming dry scriptural phrases, let us place ourselves in the most familiar scenes of contemporary daily life and, like a magnifying lens, walk through the classical definition of "mouth" step by step:

Scenario One: The "Furious Recall" in Office Software and Passive-Aggressive Workplace Chat

* Classical Mapping: Verbal formation—"with applied thought and sustained thought, therefore speech arises" (有觉有观故则口语) * Walkthrough: You see a colleague shifting blame in the work group chat, and a surge of anger rises in your chest. Before your fingers type that sarcastic "Great job, I give this logic full marks" and press send, what happens in your mind? * **Applied thought (*Vitakka*)**: The mind instantly seizes on the other person's words and produces a coarse orientation and judgment—"He's stepping on me!" * **Sustained thought (*Vicāra*)**: The mind begins to operate rapidly, calculating how to rebut him with the sharpest words and save face. * **Speech (*Vacī*)**: Finally, the text (a contemporary form of verbal karma) is sent. * Common Mis-mapping: People often think, "I just said it casually," "I have a sharp tongue but no malice." The Dharma clearly demolishes this illusion here—there is absolutely no verbal karma without a mind [6593]. Every sentence, even every bullet comment typed, is driven by "applied thought" and "sustained thought" of varying depth [6593]. Claiming "a sharp tongue but no malice" is merely a pretext for refusing to take responsibility for one's own inner hatred and arrogance.

Scenario Two: Late-Night Short Videos, Late-Night Snacks, and Gossip Trending

* Classical Mapping: The mouth-root unrestrained—"craving delicious tastes and good, neutral, and evil speech, producing the hundred-and-eight root offenses" (贪著美味及好中恶语,生百八本罪) * Walkthrough: At midnight, you are eating greasy, spicy barbecue (craving delicious tastes) while scrolling through celebrity scandals or cyberbullying incidents on social platforms, leaving vicious comments in indignation, or gleefully consuming the gossip (craving good, neutral, and evil speech) [16515]. * Psychological Mechanism: The taste of the barbecue lingers on your tongue for no more than three seconds; the stimulation of the trending topic flashes through your mind for no more than a few minutes. This is what the scripture means by "arising, then turning, then perishing" (生起后转便谢灭) [16588]. Yet in order to satisfy your palate and the pleasure of the tongue, your inner greed, bloodthirst, and judgmental drive are fully activated. Although these feelings perish, "in their perishing there is the hundred-and-eight that will be reborn and undergone in future lives, not perishing" [16588]—you have built an ever more solidified "stimulus-response" neural circuit (karmic habit-energy, 業習氣), making yourself more anxious, more irritable, and unable to find purity. * Common Mis-mapping: Thinking, "It's just a late-night snack, just a few words typed while surfing the net—I haven't hurt anyone." The classical entry warns: the mouth is not only the channel that emits speech, but also the channel that swallows stimulation [16515]. The unguarded "mouth" is the core vulnerability through which afflictions circulate [16515].

Scenario Three: Malicious Cursing and Slander After Workplace Betrayal

* Classical Mapping: Harsh speech and the "axe in the mouth" * Walkthrough: You lose out in a promotion competition and privately spread rumors about the winner to colleagues, slandering with malicious words ("praising those who should be denounced, denouncing those who should be praised" 應毀者稱譽,應譽而反毀) [12973, 16906]. * Classical Perspective: In the very moment you open your mouth to utter the slander, that "sharp axe" is already generated in your mouth and strikes fiercely at your own mind [12973, 16906, 16908]. You may find that after saying these things, you do not feel relieved but instead fall into extreme vigilance, anxiety about being exposed, and a sense of inner filth—this is the present "absence of peace" [12973]. This malicious psychological energy will continue to summon the bitter fruits of isolation and destruction in future lives [12973, 16906, 16908].


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary society is an era of "extreme overload of language and information." In the past, a person's verbal karma was limited by the physical reach of sound waves; but in the age of algorithms and the internet, every person's "mouth" has been invisibly amplified—words typed with an input method, recorded voice messages, and published videos are all extensions of "verbal karma." Contemporary people need to re-understand the wisdom of "mouth" more than any previous era, for three reasons:

1. An Antidote to "Algorithmic Emotion" and Linguistic Violence

Contemporary internet algorithms know human nature intimately and frequently push content that provokes anger, opposition, and anxiety. People are unwittingly induced to participate in "verbal attacks." The Dharma's warning about the "axe in the mouth" is not rigid moral preaching but a profound insight into mental hygiene [12973, 16906, 16908]. Recognizing that "speech is the external manifestation of inner applied and sustained thought" allows us, in the instant we want to dive into a fight and vent emotion, to suddenly arouse a wakeful awareness of "shame and self-guarding" (慚愧而自防) [14453]: Is what I am about to emit right now the wise gentle speech, or the axe driven by hatred [11728, 12973]?

2. Its Unique Value in Light of Contemporary Neuroscience and Generative AI

Contemporary neuroscience has found that human language generation is closely related to prefrontal decision-making and limbic-system emotional processing (analogous to "applied thought" and "sustained thought"), confirming that speech is the external manifestation of higher-order mental activity.

At the same time, contemporary generative AI (large language models) can produce extremely perfect, fluent text, which precisely corresponds to what the Dharma calls "speech" (語)—the combination of symbols and text [13794]. Yet no matter how many tens of thousands of words of "dharma-collections" the AI emits, it has no inner realization or awareness, and lacks direct personal experience of reality (i.e., "meaning" 義) [13794].

This reminds contemporary people: do not equate "being able to speak" with "understanding," and do not equate the complexity of information with the liberation of life. The mouth can speak eighty-four thousand dharmas, but if it is not implemented in the guarding of the mind-nature, it is merely a language game of "a machine making sounds" [13794].

3. A Guide to Building Healthy Relationships and Psychological Healing

The Tathāgata's verbal karma's twenty-eight qualities (such as gentle speech, authentic speech, blissful speech, speech still in body, speech still in mind, etc.) point contemporary people toward the highest realm of communication [11728]. Modern intimate relationships and workplace communication are full of friction, often because harsh, hypocritical, and irritable words are spoken. If one can guard verbal karma by "following wisdom," speech will not only cease to create evil but can become a pure tool for healing others and conveying peace [11728].


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

To thoroughly explain this concept, we need to clarify several of the most easily confused misconceptions:

Misreading One: Equating "Mouth" with the Physical Mouth, Reducing "Verbal Karma" to Social Politeness

* Clarification: Many people think that "guarding verbal karma" means speaking politely and with emotional intelligence. But in the Dharma, "mouth" is the manifestation of "applied thought and sustained thought" [6593]. A person who is outwardly polite and soft-spoken but inwardly full of venomous jealousy (deep applied and sustained thought) and harms others with a soft knife commits extremely grave verbal karma. Conversely, if one speaks stern warnings out of inner compassion (such as the Buddha's speech that destroys Māra and refutes false views), that is verbal karma following wisdom [11728]. The good or evil of the mouth essentially depends on the underlying applied and sustained thought that drives it, not on the pitch of the voice or the disguise of social politeness [6593].

Misreading Two: Thinking That Not Speaking (Silent Meditation, the "Dumb Sheep Monk") Is "Guarding Verbal Karma"

* Clarification: Some people, to avoid creating verbal karma, choose to forcibly "keep their mouths shut," even taking pride in it. In the scriptures, the Buddha criticized this indiscriminate forced silence as the "dumb sheep method" (啞羊法). Because the root of "verbal formation" is the inner "applied thought and sustained thought" [6593]. If your mouth says nothing but your mind is churning, cursing others a thousand times in your head (extremely active mental karma and latent verbal formation), or if you dare not proclaim the true Dharma in the face of wrong views, this is by no means true "purity of verbal karma." True guarding is "if the mouth does not harm, if the mind does not harm" (若口不害,若心不害) [11183], taming the inner mind with wisdom so that the words emitted all follow wisdom [11728].

Misreading Three: Confusing "Speech" with "Meaning," Taking the Memorization of Buddhist Terms as Liberation

* Clarification: This is the trap that Buddhist practitioners most often fall into. Many people can recite scriptural terms fluently from memory and speak eloquently about the entire Tripiṭaka, believing themselves to be highly cultivated. The scriptures define it clearly: "Being able to speak the eighty-four thousand dharma-collections is called speech; knowing that all letters and words cannot be spoken is called meaning." (能说八万四千法聚是名为语,知诸文字不可宣说是名为义。) [13794] Language and letters ("speech") are only the finger pointing at the moon. If one remains stuck in "lip-service Zen" and conceptual games, and even develops attachment to Dharma (法執, *dharma-grāha*) and arrogance from this, one is precisely using the "mouth" to create new hundred-and-eight root offenses [16515]. Only by personally realizing through insight the ineffable unconditioned reality ("meaning") is the endpoint of the path of liberation reached [13794].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在佛教经典中,「口」不仅指物理上的发声器官,更指代言语活动(口语、语)以及由此产生的业力(口业、口行)。其核心要义在于,它是内心思维(觉、观)的外在表现,是修行者防范恶业、实践「不害」的重要关口,也是如来彰显随智而行之功德、宣说八万四千法聚的清净工具。若不加防护,则会因贪著美味与语言而造作百八本罪,或因恶口谤圣而感召地狱恶报。

二、主要阐述

1. 口行的心理机制与禅修定义

经典详细探讨了「口行」的定义及其运作机制。《雜阿含經》指出,「口行」是指「有覺、有觀」。之所以如此定义,是因为人必须先在内心产生觉与观,然后才能发出言语,即所谓「有覺、有觀故則口語」。这揭示了言语表达背后的心理基础,说明言语并非凭空产生,而是依赖于内心的觉观活动。

《大方等大集經》则从禅修与呼吸的角度,将「口行」具体定义为「覺」与「觀」两种心念运作。其中,「覺」是指在出入息中产生二种心并进行思惟忆念,乃至细心渐生、得到清净心,其依止出入息而生,生已即灭;「觀」则是指观察冷相或热相触身,了知一切气息皆犹如风,并因风之因缘而观触知。觉与观皆各离境界、彼此离相。

2. 口业的防护、不害与罪业过患

在日常修行中,经典强调了对「口」的道德防护与不害实践。真正的「不害」不仅是身体不伤害,还必须做到「若口不害,若心不害」。修行者应当「善護於身口,及意一切業」,并以「慚愧而自防」的方式来守护口业,避免造作恶业。

若修行者对口不加以守防护持(「不止守」),口因接触并贪著美味以及好、中、恶语言,便会产生「口本罪百八行」。这些美味与语言在生起后转便谢灭,但在其「滅中有百八後世當復生受不滅」,这构成了百八本罪在后世流转不灭的机制。

此外,经典用极具警示性的譬喻和因果论述,阐明了「恶口」与「恶言」的危害。经中多次出现「斧在口中」的著名譬喻,指出人出生于世间,口中就如同生有「利斧」,若口出恶言,这把斧头就会「還自斬其身」。具体的口业之罪包括「應毀者稱譽,應譽而反毀」(即颠倒是非、恶意毁誉)以及毁谤佛陀与声闻等圣者。这些「恶口」和「口意恶愿」会增加人的过失,使人现世「無安樂」,其罪业「生於口」或「口中生」,死后将导致堕入恶道或百千地狱(如尼罗浮地狱、阿浮陀地狱等谤圣狱)中。

3. 如来口业功德与「语」「义」辨析

与凡夫口业不同,如来的身、口、意三业皆处于寂静状态,无能说其有过失。其中,如来的「口业」完全「隨智慧行」。如来口业的独特表现为说法清净且无脱失,具足真正语、易解语、易知语、柔软语、真实语、安乐语、身寂静语、心寂静语、坏魔语、破邪论语等多种殊胜言语,并伴随梵声、迦陵频伽声、大海潮声等美妙音声,此即「如來二十八業」之一。

同时,经典对「语」与「义」进行了深刻的辨析。「語」是指言语的宣说,如宣说贪嗔痴、障碍法、三宝功德、修集庄严菩提功德等,即「能說八萬四千法聚是名為語」;而「義」则是指对言语背后实相的证悟,如解不善根即是解脱、得无碍解脱、了知三宝功德同无为相、以一念慧觉一切法,即「知諸文字不可宣說是名為義」。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《雜阿含經》(阿含部)中,侧重于从伦理道德和因果报应的角度论述「口」,使用的相关术语多与善恶业相关,如「口行」、「口語」、「口不害」、「惡口」、「惡言」及「口意惡願」。

而在《大方等大集經》(大集部)中,对「口」的探讨则上升到大乘菩萨道与如来功德的层面。例如,将口业的圆满归结为「如來二十八業」之一的「隨智慧行」;在阐释「口行」时,不仅停留在「有觉有观」的表面,而是将其与禅修中的「出入息」及「风大」观察相结合,对「觉」与「观」进行了极其细致的心理与生理机制剖析;此外,该经还提出了「口本罪百八行」这一特定的罪业流转机制,并对「语」与「义」进行了「能说八万四千法聚」与「知诸文字不可宣说」的对立统一辨析。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「身」、「意」的关系:口与身、意共同构成「三行」(身行、口行、意行)或「三业」(身业、口业、意业)。它们相互关联,如「口行」依内心的「觉观」(意)而发起;在防护上,修行者需「善護於身口,及意一切業」;在功德上,如来则是身、口、意三业皆寂静。 2. 与「觉、观」的关系:觉与观是口行产生的直接心理基础,所谓「有覺、有觀故則口語」;在禅修中,觉与观作为口行,又与出入息及风大观察密切相关。 3. 与「语、义」的关系:口所发出的言语为「语」,而语所指向的不可宣说的实相为「义」,两者构成了言说与实相的对立统一。 4. 与「六根」的关系:口作为六根之一,若不加以守防护持,就会因贪著美味与语言而产生「口本罪百八行」。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《雜阿含經》:「有覺、有觀故則口語,是名口行。」 2. 《雜阿含經》:「若口不害,若心不害。」 3. 《雜阿含經》:「人出生世間,斧在口中生,還自斬其身,斯由惡言說。」 4. 《大方等大集經》:「如來口業隨智慧行……具足真正語、易解語、易知語、柔軟語、真實語、安樂語、身寂靜語、心寂靜語、壞魔語、破邪論語。」 5. 《大方等大集經》:「能說八萬四千法聚是名為語,知諸文字不可宣說是名為義。」 6. 《大方等大集經》:「口不止守,貪著美味及好中惡語,是名口本罪百八行。」

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「口」這一概念,並非孤立地討論言語言說本身,而是將「口」置於身、口、意三業的整體架構中加以論說,呈現出本經特有的論述側面。

一、「口」作為三業之處所 本經將人的一切造作歸納為「身」、「口」、「心」(或「意」)三個面向。在不害婆羅門的對話中,婆羅門自稱「不害」,請問佛陀此名是否名實相符。佛陀開示:「若身不害,若口不害,若心不害,則為稱實。」 由此可見,「口」與身、心並列,是造作善惡業的三大處所之一;「口不害」即是不以口出言辭而傷害他人,與身不害、心不害共同構成名實相符的條件。

二、「善護於身口」之偈頌教誡 另一段偈頌則說:「善護於身口,及意一切業,慚愧而自防,是名善守護。」 此偈以「身、口、意」的搭配(此處用「意」而非「心」),勸導修行者應當於身、口、意一切行為上皆善加防護,以慚愧之心自我防範,方堪稱「善守護」。可知「口」在本經中被明確列為守護的重要對象之一,與身、意同為修行防護的範疇。

三、術語形式之觀察 本經在同一經中兼用「身、口、心」與「身、口、意」兩種說法:前者見於佛陀答婆羅門之長行部分,後者見於偈頌部分。「心」與「意」名稱雖異,於本經中實指同一面向,即內心之意向與造作。這種異名並用的情形,反映了早期阿含文獻術語尚未完全統一的特徵。

四、核心要義 綜合兩段原文,本經論「口」的核心在於:口是與身、意(心)並列的造作處所,口之善惡關係到整體行為的清淨與否。修行者不僅應「身不害」、「心不害」,更應「口不害」;不僅應善護身、意,亦應「善護於口」,以慚愧為自防之本,方得名實相符之善人與善守護者。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

本經對「口」此一概念,並未以專門章節作系統性闡發,而是於具體對話情境中,將「口」與「身」、「意」並列,合為「身、口、意」三業之架構而提及。

就本部經所見之原文而言,「口」乃指言語、言說之行為,與身體行動(「身」)及心念思惟(「意」)相對並舉,共同涵攝人之一切行為範疇。經文載,臨別之際有人囑同伴商人云:「設當汝等不與我共去者,各自將護。設我身、口、意所犯者,悉皆原捨,莫經心意」()。此處之「口」,即指言語上之過犯,凡一切由口所發之不善言辭、惡口、妄語等,皆攝於「口」字之中。發言之主體請求同伴對其「口」所犯之過失予以原諒,反映出「口」之行為於本經中具有獨立之倫理意義,須與身、意之過犯分別揀別、各別懺謝。

值得留意者,本經所用之術語為「口」,而非以「語」、「言說」、「口業」、「語業」等其他詞彙表述。在此段原文中,「口」直接作為行為主體之構成部分,與「身」、「意」形成固定之三業配對。此種用法乃承襲早期佛教以「身口意」三分業行之傳統表述,簡明扼要,以具體之身體部位(「口」)代指該部位所發之全部言語行為。

此外,經文將「口」所犯之過失與身、意所犯並列同求懺謝,顯示本經認為「口」之行為可獨立造作過犯,與身、意之業須分別觀察、對治。此一觀點與佛教一般教理中將口業視為可單獨成立之行為管道相契合,唯本經僅以「口」一字概括其內涵,未作細分。

綜上所述,本經對「口」之論述呈現出三項特點:一、以「身口意」三分之框架提及「口」,將其置於三業整體中觀察;二、以「口」字直接指稱言語行為,術語簡練;三、視「口」為可造作過犯之獨立行為管道,須與身、意之過分別對治懺謝。經文雖未對「口」之內涵作更深入之開展,然其於實際情境中之運用,已足以顯示此概念於本經之修持實踐中佔有一席之地。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

本部經以「語」與「義」對舉、以及「口」與「語言」並列兩種方式,論述口所發出的言辭與言說。

一、「語」與「義」之分別

詳列「語者」與「義者」之對比:語者說貪恚癡,義者解不善根即是解脫;語者說障礙法,義者得無礙解脫;語者稱說三寶無量功德,義者三寶功德離欲法性同無為相;語者說從發心至坐道場修集莊嚴菩提功德,義者以一念慧覺一切法。經文總結云:「能說八萬四千法聚是名為語,知諸文字不可宣說是名為義」,明言語之功用能施設八萬四千法聚,而義則超越文字、不可宣說。此處以「語」指涉口所出之言辭施設,以「義」指言外之旨趣,凸顯言辭作為表詮工具之有限性與義之離言自證。

二、「口」與「語言」之相應

將口之所得分為三類:好味好語言、中味中語言、惡味惡語言。經云:「轉入口,口本多所得美味好語言,不止守故,口本罪百八行;口本多所得中味中語言,不止守故,口本罪百八行;口本多所得惡味惡語言,不止守故,口本罪百八行。」口之語言因其品類之好中惡,皆各成百八行之罪。 進一步論口之所得語言之生滅:「口所得美味好語言生轉便滅,滅中有百八後世當復生受不滅;口所得中味中語言生轉便滅……口所得惡味惡語言生轉便滅」,明口所得語言於當下雖生即滅,然業種不滅,後世仍當復生而受報。可見本部經將口之功能兼攝味覺與語言兩端,語言作為口所出之聲教,其善惡品類與口之感味並行觀察。

三、本經用詞之特徵

本部經論口所發言辭,統一使用「語言」一詞(如「好語言」「中語言」「惡語言」),未見「言語」「言說」「言論」等其他詞形。又以「語」作為「語者」之省稱,與「義者」構成經文中特有的對顯結構,用以辨析言說與實義之層次。

Related