Dharma · AI Companion

三律儀

tri-saṃvara

摄持身口意或三类戒行的律仪。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept Is About)

In Mahāyāna Buddhism, Sān Lǜyí (三律儀, Threefold Discipline / Three Vows) is often misunderstood as merely a list of restrictive "don'ts" or external behavioral taboos. However, in the foundational canonical framework of the *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra* (《大寶積經》), *Sān Lǜyí* represents something far more vast: it is the overarching blueprint of the Bodhisattva path (*Púsà Háng* 菩薩行), the essential nature of all Buddhas' Vinaya (*Yīqiè Rúlái Pílèiyē Fǎ* 一切如來毘奈耶法), and a direct portal leading into the ultimate reality of all phenomena (*dharmatā*).

To fully grasp *Sān Lǜyí*, we must understand its three interconnected structural dimensions, as well as the three functional components that constitute the complete Mahāyāna ethical discipline.


1. The Three Structural Dimensions of the Teaching

In the *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra*, when Venerable Mahākāśyapa asks Buddha Śākyamuni for the name of this profound teaching, the Buddha provides three equivalent names, revealing its three essential dimensions:

* **The Normative Dimension — "Bodhisattva Restraints" (*Púsà Jìnjiè* 菩薩禁戒 / *Yīqiè Rúlái Pílèiyē Fǎ* 一切如來毘奈耶法):** This is the objective, inherited framework of ethical training passed down by all Tathāgatas. It outlines clear boundaries for actions of body, speech, and mind, serving as a protective shield that prevents a practitioner from falling into unwholesome karmic momentum. * **The Ultimate Reality Dimension — "Entering Concurrently into All Dharmas" (*Tóng Rù Yīqiè Zhūfǎ* 同入一切諸法):** This reveals the ultimate purpose and果 (*guǒ*, fruition) of discipline. The observance of vows is not an end in itself, nor is it an exercise in self-righteous moralism. Its ultimate purpose is to dissolve the obscurations of ego and conceptual grasping, allowing the practitioner to enter directly and equally into the true, unconditioned reality of all phenomena (*dharmatā*). * **The Subjective/Practical Dimension — "Deep Resolution" (*Shēn Yìlè* 深意樂):** In response to Bodhisattva Supriya (*Miàohuì Púsà* 妙慧菩薩), the Buddha states that to eliminate "dharma-barriers" (*fǎzhàng* 法障, spiritual obstacles) and rapidly attain purity, one must "sustain the Three Vows with deep resolution" (*Yǐ shēn yìlè shè sān lǜyí* 以深意樂攝三律儀). Here, *Shēn Yìlè* refers to an unshakeable, heartfelt conviction, pure motivation, and profound joy rooted in Bodhicitta—not passive compliance under fear or social pressure.


2. The Three Components of Bodhisattva Discipline

In the broader Mahāyāna textual tradition (such as the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* and注疏 on Bodhisattva vows), the term "Three Vows/Discipline" (*Sān Lǜyí* / *Sān Jù Jìngjiè* 三聚淨戒) precisely divides Bodhisattva ethical practice into three distinct, non-negotiable layers:

1. ***Shè Lǜyí Jiè* (攝律儀戒, The Discipline of Restraint / Prātimokṣa Discipline):** *Definition:* The absolute commitment to refrain from all unwholesome actions of body, speech, and mind (such as killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, divisive speech, harsh words, idle gossip, greed, anger, and wrong views). *Boundary:* It focuses on stopping non-virtue (*zhē 惡* / *duàn 惡*). It forms the irreplaceable foundation without which no higher spiritual realization can occur. 2. ***Shè Shànfǎ Jiè* (攝善法戒, The Discipline of Gathering Virtuous Dharmas):** *Definition:* The active, proactive cultivation of all positive, wholesome qualities, mental states, and spiritual practices—such as mindfulness, patience, generosity, study of the Dharma, contemplation, and wisdom. *Boundary:* Restraining oneself from evil is insufficient; a Bodhisattva must actively gather every drop of goodness and wisdom to mature their own mindstream (*chángshú zì xiāngxù* 成熟自相續). 3. ***Ráoyì Yǒuqíng Jiè* (饒益有情戒, The Discipline of Benefiting Sentient Beings):** *Definition:* The dedicated application of all one's actions, skills, energy, and spiritual power toward relieving the suffering of sentient beings, aiding them in times of distress, and guiding them toward ultimate liberation. *Boundary:* This marks the unique Mahāyāna transition from self-purification to altruistic action (*chángshú tā xiāngxù* 成熟他相續). Without this, ethical discipline remains incomplete and self-absorbed.

``` ┌─ 攝律儀戒 (Restraint: Ceasing non-virtue) ├─ 攝善法戒 (Gathering Virtues: Cultivating good roots) 三律儀 ─────────┴─ 饒益有情戒 (Benefiting Beings: Altruistic action) (Tri-saṃvara) Sustained by ──► 深意樂 (Shēn Yìlè: Deep Resolution & Pure Intent) Directing to ──► 同入一切諸法 (Tóng Rù Yīqiè Zhūfǎ: Entry into Ultimate Reality) ```

In the overall Path of Liberation (*Xiětuō Dào* 解脫道), *Sān Lǜyí* sits at the very beginning of genuine practice. It is not an arbitrary set of rules imposed from outside, but an internal dynamic firewall and transformational engine: it stops karmic leakage, builds spiritual capacity, and purifies Buddha-fields (*jìng zhuāngyán yīqiè fóchà* 淨莊嚴一切佛剎).


生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To bring *Sān Lǜyí* out of abstract classical Chinese texts and into our contemporary reality, let us trace how these three layers operate in a typical modern scenario: navigating workplace drama, social media outrage, and personal exhaustion.

Scenario: The Mid-Week Office Crisis & Social Media Outrage

Imagine it is 9:30 PM on a Wednesday. You have just finished a high-stress overtime session. A colleague shifted blame onto you during an afternoon meeting, leaving you furious. Meanwhile, as you scroll through your smartphone in the subway, an algorithmic feed pushes a rage-inducing news thread or a toxic online argument directly to your screen.

How does *Sān Lǜyí* function step-by-step in this exact moment?


Step 1: *Shè Lǜyí Jiè* (攝律儀戒 — The Discipline of Restraint)

* The Instant Impulse: Your mind generates a sharp spike of anger. You feel an overwhelming urge to type a sarcastic, biting comment online to unleash your frustration, or to text another coworker to badmouth the colleague who threw you under the bus. * The Practice: You apply *Shè Lǜyí Jiè*. Recognizing that physical or verbal retaliation will only multiply karmic toxicity and cloud your mind, you consciously pause. You do not hit "send"; you put your phone in your pocket. You restrain your tongue and fingers. * Where modern people mismap this: *Mistake:* Many people mistake *Shè Lǜyí Jiè* for passive emotional suppression ("I'm furious, but I'll swallow my rage and pretend to be nice"). Suppression builds internal pressure and resentment. True *Shè Lǜyí Jiè* is a conscious, clear-eyed decision: "I see this reactive momentum; I choose not to feed this flames because it harms both myself and others."


Step 2: *Shè Shànfǎ Jiè* (攝善法戒 — The Discipline of Gathering Virtuous Dharmas)

* The Pivot: Merely holding back a toxic comment (*Shè Lǜyí*) leaves a vacuum in your mind, which might still be churning with passive-aggressive bitterness. Now, you step into *Shè Shànfǎ Jiè*. * The Practice: You actively redirect your cognitive energy toward wholesome states. On the train ride home, instead of replaying the workplace conflict or feeding on doom-scrolling outrage, you turn on an uplifting discourse, practice simple breath-awareness, or contemplate impermanence and patience (*kṣānti*). You actively cultivate composure, clarity, and analytical wisdom. * Where modern people mismap this: *Mistake:* People often think that "not doing bad things" makes them a good practitioner. In Buddhist training, staying neutral or passive is not enough. If you do not actively plant positive, wholesome seeds (*Shè Shànfǎ*), your baseline reactivity remains unchanged, and you will collapse the next time a stronger crisis hits.


Step 3: *Ráoyì Yǒuqíng Jiè* (饒益有情戒 — The Discipline of Benefiting Sentient Beings)

* The Altruistic Fulfillment: Now, you expand your perspective beyond your ego-centric defensive sphere. * The Practice: You realize that the colleague who blamed you in the meeting was likely acting out of intense fear, insecurity, and corporate pressure. The following morning, instead of giving them the cold shoulder or plotting revenge, you approach them with calm, clear communication. You address the project issue constructively while offering them a dignified way out. Online, instead of adding to rage-bait threads, you share constructive, helpful resources or offer silent, genuine wishes of peace to struggling people. * Where modern people mismap this: *Mistake:* People often think altruism (*Ráoyì Yǒuqíng*) means becoming a "people-pleaser" or an enabler who allows others to walk all over them. In Mahāyāna discipline, true benefit to beings is guided by wisdom and strength: it means acting in ways that genuinely help others step out of delusion and suffering, even if it requires setting clear, compassionate boundaries.


The Underlying Engine: *Shēn Yìlè* (深意樂)

Throughout this entire sequence, what powers your choices is not fear of divine punishment or a desire to look morally superior to your peers. It is Shēn Yìlè—a deep, authentic, heartfelt desire to break free from the endless cycle of reactivity (*samsāra*) and to help all beings do the same. Because your intent is deep and sincere, holding discipline feels liberating rather than suffocating.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Modern People Need It)

Modern life is characterized by hyper-connectivity, algorithmic manipulation, value fragmentation, and chronic burnout. We live in an ecosystem designed to commodify our uninhibited impulses—our fear, outrage, lust, and greed.

1. Reclaiming Autonomy in an Algorithmic World

Modern algorithms are engineered to bypass our rational mind and trigger subcortical, reactive impulses. Without a structured discipline of restraint (*Shè Lǜyí Jiè*), human consciousness becomes an endlessly manipulated node in a digital outrage machine. *Sān Lǜyí* provides a psychological and spiritual "firewall," restoring true internal sovereignty and executive control over our attention and choices.

2. Bridging Neuroscience and Transcendent Wisdom

In modern cognitive neuroscience, the ability to refrain from automatic reactivity is studied as *executive function* or *inhibitory control*—primarily managed by the prefrontal cortex regulating the amygdala.

* The Scientific Analogy: Just as strengthening prefrontal neural pathways allows an individual to regulate emotional stress, practicing *Sān Lǜyí* rewires behavioral patterns and reduces psychological friction. * The Crucial Distinction & Limitation: Neuroscience views inhibitory control primarily as a functional tool for emotional regulation, productivity, or mental wellness within the worldly setup. Buddhist *Sān Lǜyí*, however, goes vastly deeper. It is not merely about stress management; it is aimed at completely eradicating egoic grasping (*ātma-grāha*), purifying the mindstream, and directly penetrating the ultimate, uncreated reality of all phenomena (*Tóng Rù Yīqiè Zhūfǎ*). Science studies the mechanism of the brain; *Sān Lǜyí* transforms the ultimate nature of conscious experience.

3. Curing the Disease of Spiritual & Moral Burnout

Many modern people feel exhausted by moral discourse because ethics is often framed as external judgment, virtue signaling, or social shaming. *Sān Lǜyí* offers a radical antidote by anchoring discipline in *Shēn Yìlè* (deep internal aspiration). It transforms moral action from a heavy social duty into an act of profound self-respect, inner freedom, and compassionate service.


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misconceptions and Clarifications)

To ensure a precise understanding of *Sān Lǜyí*, we must address three pervasive misconceptions that frequently confuse contemporary seekers:

Misconception 1: "Discipline and vows (律儀) are rigid, dogmatic rules that kill personal freedom and creativity."

* Clarification: In the Mahāyāna vision, true discipline is the prerequisite for real freedom. Unchecked impulses do not represent "freedom"; they represent enslavement to subconscious habits (*vāsanā*) and external conditioning. When you cannot stop yourself from scrolling, overeating, losing your temper, or reacting out of fear, you are not free—you are driven by habit. *Sān Lǜyí*, backed by *Shēn Yìlè* (deep resolution), breaks this automatic reactivity, giving you the power to choose how you respond to life. It is the ultimate liberation of mind, not a suppression of it.

Misconception 2: "Discipline (戒) is just a basic, lower-level moral code; ultimate wisdom (般若, *Prajñā*) renders discipline obsolete."

* Clarification: The *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra* explicitly equates *Sān Lǜyí* with *Tóng Rù Yīqiè Zhūfǎ* (Entering Concurrently into All Dharmas). Discipline is not a temporary scaffolding to be discarded once wisdom is studied intellectually. Without pure discipline, the mind remains filled with karmic turbulence and "dharma-barriers" (*fǎzhàng* 法障), making true insight into emptiness (*śūnyatā*) impossible. High-level wisdom is non-different from flawless, effortless discipline; they are two sides of the same coin.

Misconception 3: "Holding Bodhisattva vows simply means keeping my own hands, mouth, and thoughts clean (self-preservation)."

* Clarification: As established in the tripartite definition of *Sān Lǜyí*, refraining from bad deeds (*Shè Lǜyí Jiè*) is only the first layer. A Bodhisattva who merely avoids evil but neglects to cultivate positive spiritual qualities (*Shè Shànfǎ Jiè*) or refuses to engage in the tedious, difficult work of helping sentient beings (*Ráoyì Yǒuqíng Jiè*) has broken the core spirit of the Bodhisattva discipline. True *Sān Lǜyí* is dynamic, courageous, and thoroughly altruistic.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在《大宝积经》(唐菩提流志译)的教义体系中,“三律仪”(tri-saṃvara)是一个具有核心地位的修行与教法概念。它不仅仅是指个体修行者在外在行为上的戒律规范,更是被提升至如来教法本体、菩萨行总纲以及契入法界实相的高度。根据经中阐述,“三律仪”在教法本质上等同于“一切如来毘奈耶法”与“菩萨禁戒”,其终极指向则是“同入一切诸法”。在实践层面,它是菩萨在修行起步阶段,必须以“深意乐”去摄持和奉行的根本戒规,是消除一切法障、快速成就清净境界的决定性前提。

二、主要阐述

《大宝积经》从教法功能、经典命名以及实践路径等多个维度,对“三律仪”进行了系统而深刻的阐述:

1. 教法性质与宏大功能: 经中将“三律仪”与如来的整体戒律教法(毘奈耶)紧密结合。佛陀在广大信众围绕的庄严法会中,所宣说的正是“广说三律仪品一切如来毘奈耶法”。这表明“三律仪”是如来戒律之法的核心体现。该教法具有极其宏大的功能与效用:在自利方面,它能够“开现一切诸菩萨行,明照法界入诸法门”;在利他与护法方面,它能够“能净庄严一切佛刹,摧诸邪论降伏魔怨,令众生界心得欢喜”。这证明“三律仪”是大乘菩萨道展开的基石,具有净化国土、降伏外道魔障、普度众生的力量。

2. 经典命名与法门等价: “三律仪”直接构成了经名的核心。当尊者大迦叶请问此经法的名称时,佛陀宣告此经名为“说三律仪”。为了全面揭示该概念的内涵,佛陀同时给出了另外两个等价的名称:“亦名『宣说菩萨禁戒』,亦名『同入一切诸法』”。这一命名方式将“三律仪”与“菩萨禁戒”及“同入一切诸法”完全等同起来,表明持守三律仪的究竟目的,是为了引导修行者平等地契入一切诸法的实相妙理。

3. 菩萨修行的实践起点: 在佛陀对妙慧菩萨的开示中,指出菩萨若能成就四种法,就能够“离法障速得清净”。在这四种决定性的法门之中,居于首位的便是“以深意乐摄三律仪”。这里的“摄”字体现了对律仪的摄持、受持与全面奉行;而“深意乐”则强调了持守律仪的内在心态,即必须建立在内心深处真诚、清净且坚固的誓愿之上,而非仅仅流于外在行为的被动约束。只有以深意乐摄持三律仪,才能真正起到远离法障、速证清净的效果。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大宝积经》的相关论述中,对于“三律仪”这一核心概念,随着上下文语境的不同,出现了多种同义或关联性的表述。这些表述在侧重点上存在细微差异,反映了该概念的多维属性:

* 教法规范维度:在强调其作为如来所传授的戒律规范时,经文使用“一切如来毘奈耶法”与“菩萨禁戒”来与“三律仪”并提。其中,“毘奈耶法”更侧重于教法的传承体系与客观规范,而“菩萨禁戒”则更侧重于菩萨主体所应奉行的戒律约束。 * 终极实相维度:在指向修行的终极果位与实相契入时,经文将其等同于“同入一切诸法”。这表明在该经的语境中,律仪的持守并非与般若智慧相分离,而是直接导向对诸法实相的平等契入。 * 实践心态维度:在具体修行指导中,经文特别强调“以深意乐摄三律仪”,将“深意乐”作为“摄三律仪”的限定与前提,区别于一般无深信心的机械持戒。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“一切如来毘奈耶法”的关系: “三律仪”是“一切如来毘奈耶法”的核心内容与具体展开。如来所宣说的毘奈耶法,其根本宗旨与实践条目皆汇归于三律仪之中,两者是总与别、教与行的关系。

2. 与“菩萨禁戒”的关系: 两者在术语上具有等同性。三律仪即是菩萨禁戒的具体化,是菩萨行者在身、口、意三业上所应严格奉行的禁制与规范。

3. 与“同入一切诸法”的关系: 这是因果与体用的关系。持守“三律仪”(因)是手段,而“同入一切诸法”(果)则是目的。通过对三律仪的清净持守,修行者得以消除障碍,最终证入一切诸法平等无二的实相。

4. 与“离法障速得清净”的关系: “以深意乐摄三律仪”是菩萨“离法障速得清净”四法之首。法障是障碍修行者证悟的根本因,而深意乐摄持的三律仪则是破除此障碍、快速恢复自性清净的最关键力量。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于教法功能: “尔时世尊,在于大众侧塞围绕法会之中,宣说广说三律仪品一切如来毘奈耶法,开现一切诸菩萨行,明照法界入诸法门,能净庄严一切佛刹,摧诸邪论降伏魔怨,令众生界心得欢喜。”

2. 关于经典命名与等价概念: “佛告迦叶:『此经名为说三律仪,亦名宣说菩萨禁戒,亦名同入一切诸法。如是名字汝当受持。』”

3. 关于修行实践与离障: “佛言:『妙慧!菩萨成就四法,离法障速得清净。何等为四?一者以深意乐摄三律仪……』”

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》對「三律儀」之論述,散見於序分、流通分及正宗分中,呈現三個層面。

一、經之立名與定位。流通分中,大迦葉問經名,佛告之曰:「是經名曰『說三律儀』,亦名『宣說菩薩禁戒』,亦名『同入一切諸法』。」 據此,本經以「三律儀」為第一經名,而第二異名「宣說菩薩禁戒」直接揭示三律儀之實質內涵即菩薩禁戒。此為本經獨特之術語對應:三律儀與菩薩禁戒為同義互釋,非僅聲聞別解脫戒,而屬菩薩戒範疇。第三異名「同入一切諸法」則將戒行與般若法門相貫,暗示三律儀之究竟歸趣在於一切法之平等悟入。

二、序分中對說法內容之總括。經初列眾已畢,即言佛「廣說三律儀品一切如來毘奈耶法,開現一切諸菩薩行,明照法界入諸法門,能淨莊嚴一切佛剎,摧諸邪論降伏魔怨,令眾生界心得歡喜」。此處「三律儀品」與「一切如來毘奈耶法」並舉,表明三律儀乃如來毘奈耶(律藏)之品目,而其所開顯者為「一切諸菩薩行」。換言之,本經將三律儀置於如來毘奈耶之框架下,卻以菩薩行為其開展方向。其後「明照法界入諸法門」等語,則顯示此律儀非止於身口意之消極遮防,兼有照了法界、莊嚴佛剎、摧邪顯正之積極功用。值得注意的是,本經用「毘奈耶」(vinaya)一詞指稱律法整體,而非僅用「戒」或「律」,此為本經術語形式之一。

三、正宗分中以「攝」字顯修行要旨。妙慧菩薩會中,佛說菩薩成就四法「能離法障速得清淨」,其第一法即「以深意樂攝三律儀」。此處用一「攝」字,意謂以深心意樂總持、領納三律儀,非僅外在持守,而須內在深心之好樂以為根本。其餘三法——聞甚深經不生誹謗、見新發意菩薩生一切智心、於諸有情大慈平等——皆屬智慧與慈悲之修養,與「攝三律儀」並列為離法障之四因,可見本經視三律儀為菩薩道之基礎攝持,須與般若、慈悲相輔而行,非孤立之戒條。

綜觀本經,「三律儀」之術語形式固定,未見以「三聚戒」「三聚淨戒」等異稱替代;然以「菩薩禁戒」為其異名,以「如來毘奈耶」為其所屬法類,以「攝」為其修持動詞,以「深意樂」為其能攝之心,構成一套自足之表述。本經未進一步細分三律儀之內部結構(如後世所判攝律儀戒、攝善法戒、饒益有情戒之三聚),僅以總名「三律儀」統攝菩薩禁戒之全體,此為本經論述之特色。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》先以「無表三律儀,不律儀非二」總攝無表的三類差別。論文明釋無表略有三種:一為「律儀」,二為「不律儀」,三為「非二」,即非律儀亦非不律儀。其中,「律儀」得名於能遮止、能滅除惡戒相續。由此可知,本論談論律儀時,先將它置於無表的三分架構中,而非直接以身、口、意三項作為唯一分類。

就律儀自身的種類而言,《阿毘達磨俱舍論》明言「律儀差別,略有三種」:第一「別解脫律儀」,釋為「欲纏戒」;第二「靜慮生律儀」,釋為「色纏戒」;第三「道生律儀」,釋為「無漏戒」。因此,本論記錄「三律儀」時所用的完整術語形式,是「別解脫律儀、靜慮生律儀、道生律儀」;其後又以較簡略的形式稱為「別解脫、靜慮、無漏三種律儀」。這兩組表述在本論中前後相應,其中「道生律儀」以「無漏戒」說明,後文則簡稱「無漏律儀」。

本論亦引頌說「身律儀善哉,善哉語律儀,意律儀善哉,善哉遍律儀」,明確使用「身律儀、語律儀、意律儀、遍律儀」等名稱。值得注意的是,本論用「語律儀」,並非在此頌中寫作「口律儀」;而且頌文除身、語、意之外,另舉「遍律儀」。故若以「攝持身口意」概括此概念,仍應記錄本論原有的用詞與排列,不宜把此頌逕改寫成另一套三分名稱。

關於三種律儀的依處與成就範圍,本論說律儀可在人趣及天趣中存在,但「唯人具三種律儀」,即別解脫、靜慮、無漏三者皆可具足。欲界天與色界眾生容有靜慮律儀;無漏律儀亦可在欲界天、色界及無色界成就,但無色界因無色之故,必不現起。北俱盧人則因無受、無定,亦無造惡的殊勝意樂,故無善戒與惡戒;惡趣缺乏猛利慚愧,也無律儀與不律儀。論中又以律儀與不律儀「相翻立」說明二者的相對關係。

總括而言,《阿毘達磨俱舍論》對「三律儀」的核心論述有兩個相連而須分辨的層次:一是無表分為律儀、不律儀、非二;二是律儀本身分為別解脫律儀、靜慮生律儀、道生律儀。身、語、意律儀則見於另一頌式表述,並連同遍律儀受到讚歎。如此保存本論的原詞,方能準確呈現其分類層次與術語形式。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》論「三律儀」並非僅有單一的三分名稱,而從業行觀察、律儀功能與菩薩三戒的攝持關係,分別顯示三種組織方式。

一、就戒律儀的清淨觀察而言,論中明說有「三種觀清淨因相」:觀身業、觀語業、觀意業。對身、語二業,於將作、正作及已作之際,皆觀其是否自損、損他,是否屬不善性而能生眾苦、招苦異熟;若屬黑品,便攝斂不作,已作則向有智同梵行者如實發露、如法悔除;若不損自他、屬於善性,則造作隨行並生歡喜。意業亦依過去、未來、現在所起,反覆觀察黑品、白品:黑品攝斂不起,白品則發起與便。故此處以「身業、語業、意業」為三業的正式用詞,並以「觀察」「清淨」貫串三世業行,呈現攝持身口意的實際方法;原文用「語業」,不作「口業」。

二、就律儀自身的建立與作用而言,論中先詳分能起、攝受、防護、還引、下品、中品、上品、靜慮及無漏等律儀,繼而總攝為三:「受律儀、持律儀、清淨律儀」。其中,能起與攝受二者屬「受」;防護與還引屬「持」;下、中、上三品通於受、持;靜慮律儀與無漏律儀則攝入「清淨」。因此,此處的「三」不是身、語、意三業,也不是三類受戒身分,而是依受納、防守與清淨三種功能,統攝前述八類律儀。

三、論中另立「苾芻、近事、近住三種律儀」,其建立依所化眾生能力而異:能行離惡行及離欲行者,立苾芻律儀;能離惡行而不能行離欲行者,立近事律儀;二者皆不能究竟行者,立近住律儀。此處特用「苾芻」「近事」「近住」,並稱「三種律儀」;它是依所化種類及可行程度所作的三分,不可與「受、持、清淨」混同。

四、在菩薩戒脈絡中,論稱「三種所受菩薩戒」及「三種律儀」,並說三種戒由「律儀戒」攝持而令和合。律儀戒若能精勤守護,餘二亦得守護;若不能守護,餘二亦不能守護,所以毀律儀戒即名毀一切菩薩律儀。此處突出律儀戒對三種菩薩戒的統攝、聯結與根本防護作用,而非把三戒直接等同於身、語、意三業。

Related