Dharma · AI Companion

三不善法

tri-akuśala-dharma

貪瞋癡等三類不善之法。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying (这个概念在说什么)

In Buddhist thought, "Three Unwholesome Dharmas" (*sān bùshàn fǎ* 三不善法; Sanskrit: *trīṇy akuśala-dharmāḥ*) is a crucial master category used across early sutras to diagnose the root afflictions, mental movements, and behavioral drivers that bind sentient beings to suffering (*duḥkha*) and propel them toward lower realms of existence (*èqù* 惡趣).

While the term appears deceptively straightforward, canonical scriptures do not treat it as a single static list. Instead, depending on the textual context and pedagogical objective in the *Āgamas* (阿含經), the term expands across three main, distinct layers of articulation:

1. The Triad of Roots: Greed, Ill-Will, and Delusion

In the broadest and most fundamental sense, "Three Unwholesome Dharmas" is functionally interchangeable with—or anchored by—the "Three Unwholesome Roots" (*sān bùshàn gēn* 三不善根): * Greed / Covetousness (*tānyù* 貪欲; *rāga* / *lobha*): Not merely wanting things, but an intoxicating, grasping attachment to pleasant sensations, objects, statuses, or self-images. * Ill-Will / Anger (*chēnhuì* 瞋恚; *dveṣa* / *dosa*): A reactive aversion, hostility, resentment, or resistance toward unpleasant, threatening, or inconvenient phenomena. * Delusion / Ignorance (*yūchī* 愚癡 or *wúmíng* 無明; *moha* / *avidyā*): The fundamental blindness to reality—specifically, failing to perceive things as they truly are (impermanent, non-self, and unsatisfactory)—which misleads one into taking the conditioned as permanent and the self as solid.

In *Saṃyukta Āgama* (雜阿含經 T0099) and *Dīrgha Āgama* (長阿含經 T0001), these three form the "unwholesome aggregate" (*bùshàn jù* 不善聚). They act as the internal engine driving all ten unwholesome courses of action (*shí bùshàn yè* 十不善業), such as killing, stealing, lying, and malicious speech.

2. The Triad of Mental Movements: Thoughts of Desire, Ill-Will, and Harm

In specific meditative and path-oriented contexts (such as the road metaphor in *Saṃyukta Āgama*), the Buddha defines the Three Unwholesome Dharmas as: * Thought of Desire (*tān jué* 貪覺 / *yù jué* 欲覺; *kāma-vitakka*): Discursive mental application toward sensual longing. * Thought of Ill-Will (*huì jué* 恚覺; *byāpāda-vitakka*): Discursive mental application fueled by resentment or animosity. * Thought of Harm / Cruelty (*hài jué* 害覺; *vihiṃsā-vitakka*): Active mental wandering or plotting that intends to inflict pain, damage, or distress upon another.

Here, the focus shifts from latent roots to active cognitive processes (*vitakka* / *jué* 覺—discursive thinking). In the famous allegory of the two paths, the Buddha describes himself as the "guide who knows the road" (*zhīlù zhě* 知路者) and the uninstructed person as "ignorant of the road" (*bùzhīlù zhě* 不知路者). The "Left Road" (*zuǒlù* 左路) consists precisely of these three unwholesome thoughts. Stepping onto this left road diverts one directly into the "Eightfold Wrong Path" (*bā xiédào* 八邪道: wrong view, wrong intention, wrong speech, wrong action, wrong livelihood, wrong effort, wrong mindfulness, and wrong concentration).

3. The Triad of Social & Moral Degradation: Unlawful Lust, Unlawful Greed, and Wrong Views

In *Dīrgha Āgama* (T0001), within the narrative on the causal history of human lifespan and civilization, the Buddha provides a concrete social-ethical definition: * Unlawful Lust / Deviant Passion (*fēifǎ yín* 非法婬): Sexual or sensual indulgence that violates moral order, boundary, or mutual respect. * Unlawful Greed / Illegitimate Covetousness (*fēifǎ tān* 非法貪): Economic or physical exploitation, taking what is not given, or predatory acquisition. * Wrong View (*xiéjiàn* 邪見; *micchā-diṭṭhi*): Ideological distortion—denying cause and effect (*karma*), denying moral responsibility, or holding that actions carry no fruit.

In this cosmic-historical narrative, when human beings recognized that these three unwholesome practices caused their life expectancy, vitality, and social harmony to plummet, they collectively resolved to abandon them, thereby doubling their lifespan and restoring human well-being.

Position in the Path to Liberation (*Vimutti*)

Why does early Buddhism categorize these three so rigorously? The core mechanism lies in entanglement of the mind (*jiébù qí xīn* 結縛其心). The *Āgamas* emphasize that all evil/unwholesome phenomena stem from Ignorance (*wúmíng* 無明) as their root. Because of ignorance, one fails to discern wholesome from unwholesome; this produces wrong views (*xiéjiàn* 邪見), which ignite greed, ill-will, and harm.

When these three act continuously, they wrap around the heart-mind like choking vines, ensuring that at the moment of death, the individual gravitates toward "Hell / Lower Realms" (*èqù nílí* 惡趣泥犁). Conversely, the Path to Liberation is not an abstract metaphysical ascension; it begins by as-it-is knowing (*rúshí zhī* 如實知) and taming/abandoning (*tiáofú* 調伏) these three unwholesome roots. Replacing them with "Non-Greed, Non-Ill-Will, and Non-Delusion" (*sān shàn gēn* 三善根 / *sān shànfǎ* 三善法) establishes the Right Road (*yòulù* 右路), turning wrong intention into Right View (*zhèngjiàn* 正見) and Right Concentration (*zhèngdìng* 正定), culminating in Unconditioned Freedom (*wúlòu xīn jiětuō, huì jiětuō* 無漏心解脫、慧解脫).


Walkthrough in Everyday Life (生活里的走查)

To truly understand how the Three Unwholesome Dharmas operate, we must look beyond abstract terms and trace them through the micro-moments of contemporary life—commuting, scrolling on smartphones, working overtime, navigating intimate relationships, and parenting.

Scenario 1: Late-Night Smartphone Scrolling & Online Debates

* The Moment: You are lying in bed at 11:30 PM. You open a social media app. You see a controversial post about a political or cultural issue. * The Unwholesome Operations: * *Delusion / Ignorance* (*yūchī* / *wúmíng*): You fall into the unexamined assumption that winning an argument in the comment section will somehow secure your self-worth or fix the world. You mistake a transient digital illusion for a solid battlefield of "Me vs. Them". * *Thought of Desire / Covetousness* (*tān jué*): A craving for dopamine—seeking the pleasure of likes, retweets, or the feeling of moral superiority. * *Thought of Ill-Will & Harm* (*huì jué* & *hài jué*): As you read comments opposing your view, a surge of irritation (*huì*) arises. You type a razor-sharp, sarcastic reply meant specifically to embarrass or crush the opponent (*hài*—thought of harm). * Where People Misapply the Mapping: Many people think "thought of harm" (*hài jué*) requires plotting physical violence. In reality, drafting a spiteful comment designed to ruin someone's day is precisely *hài jué*. The moment you click "Send," an unwholesome mental act (*yì 惡行*) becomes an unwholesome verbal act (*kǒu 惡行*), tightening the knot on your own mental peace.

Scenario 2: High-Stress Office Work & Overtime

* The Moment: It is 8:00 PM on a Friday. Your boss assigns a sudden rush project, or a colleague dumps their responsibility onto your desk. * The Unwholesome Operations: * *Thought of Ill-Will* (*huì jué*): Immediate inner resistance and resentment. Your chest tightens, your heart rate rises, and you internally curse your boss or colleague. * *Unlawful Greed / Driven Delusion* (*fēifǎ tān* / *yūchī*): In response, you might secretly sabotage the project, withhold crucial information from your team to make them fail, or lie about your progress. * Where People Misapply the Mapping: People often confuse professional self-protection with unwholesome roots, or conversely, normalize harmful resentment as "just work stress." Setting professional boundaries calmly is *not* ill-will; but harboring passive-aggressive malice (*hài jué*) or indulging in retaliatory deceit (*shí bùshàn yè*) is the exact point where "work stress" mutates into an unwholesome karma-generating process.

Scenario 3: Intimacy & Parenting

* The Moment: Your child spills milk across your laptop, or your partner forgets a promise for the third time this week. * The Unwholesome Operations: * *Ill-Will* (*chēnhuì*): The sudden, explosive anger aimed at punishing the child or partner. * *Wrong View in Micro-Form* (*xiéjiàn*): Expecting a young child or an imperfect partner to flawlessly conform to your static expectations at all times, ignoring the law of cause and condition (*pratītyasamutpāda*). * *Unlawful Lust / Possession* (*fēifǎ yín* / *tān*): Treating an intimate partner or child as an object owned by you to fulfill your security needs, rather than as an independent subject. * The Internal Result: When you yell at your child out of pure ill-will, your mind immediately experiences agitation, guilt, and contraction—a mini "hell realm" (*èqù*) experienced right in the living room.


Why Contemporary People Need It (当代人为什么需要它)

Why is a 2,500-year-old classification of unwholesome states urgently needed in the modern age?

1. Decoupling from the "Algorithm Economy"

Contemporary algorithmic architectures—from short-video platforms to news feeds—are systematically engineered to monetise the Three Unwholesome Roots. * *Greed* is triggered by endless scrolling, consumerist ads, and algorithmic hype. * *Ill-Will* is amplified because outraged users engage significantly more with content that sparks anger. * *Delusion* is reinforced by echo chambers that feed bias and shield users from reality.

Understanding the "Three Unwholesome Dharmas" provides a mental firewall. It allows a contemporary person to realize: *"My outrage and craving are not purely my own authentic choices; they are predictable outputs generated when my latent unwholesome roots are poked by external algorithms."*

2. Clearer Self-Diagnosis Than Modern Psychology

Modern cognitive psychology and neuroscience offer valuable insights into stress responses, amygdala hijackings, and reward pathways. However, science primarily operates on a descriptive and functional level—explaining *how* dopamine or cortisol functions in the brain. It deliberately avoids making ultimate ethical-existential judgements about whether a mental state binds one to existential suffering.

The Buddhist framework of *sān bùshàn fǎ* goes further by offering an existential direction: * It clearly points out that any thought rooted in greed, hatred, or harm—no matter how justified by social norms—inevitably contracts consciousness, distorts perception, and yields suffering (*duḥkha*). * *Note of Limit & Distinction*: While brain scans can show elevated amygdala activity during anger, science cannot "prove" metaphysical karma or rebirth in lower realms. The value of the Buddhist concept is an experiential and spiritual truth: you can directly observe in real-time that whenever ill-will dominates your mind, inner peace vanishes instantly.

3. Navigating AI and Autonomous Tools

As artificial intelligence automates routine tasks, human agency shifts increasingly into the realm of intention and decision-making (*cetanā* / *yì yè* 意業). If human choices are driven by greed, ill-will, or delusion, powerful technological tools will merely scale up those unwholesome roots to a global level. Recognizing the Three Unwholesome Dharmas gives modern leaders, engineers, and citizens an uncompromising compass to evaluate the moral trajectories of technology.


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications (常见误读与澄清)

Misinterpretation 1: Equating "Unwholesome" (*Akuśala*) with Christian "Sin" or Moral Guilt

* Clarification: In traditional Western concepts of sin, an act is wrong because it violates a divine command, triggering external divine punishment. In contrast, the Sanskrit term *akuśala* (不善) literally means "unskillful," "unhealthy," or "clumsy." * An unwholesome state is not bad because an authority judged it so; it is unwholesome because it is inherently untamed, unstable, and produces suffering for oneself and others, like swallowing poison out of ignorance. The fruit of lower realms (*èqù*) is the natural consequence of mind-entanglement (*jiébù qí xīn*), not an arbitrary external sentence.

Misinterpretation 2: Suppressing Normal Emotions (e.g., Sadness or Boundary-Setting) as "Unwholesome"

* Clarification: People often mistakenly think that feeling grief, sorrow, or standing up against injustice is "ill-will" (*chēnhuì*). * Canonical texts make precise distinctions: * *Ill-will* (*chēnhuì*) specifically involves malicious aversion or the urge to hurt/destroy (*hài jué*). * *Firm action*: Setting a clear, forceful boundary to prevent harm to oneself or others—when done with clarity and compassion—is driven by *non-ill-will* (*wú huì* 無恚) and *non-delusion* (*wú chī* 無癡). * Buddhism does not advocate emotional numbness, but rather transforming reactionary aversion into clear-sighted wisdom (*míng* 明).

Misinterpretation 3: Thinking "Unwholesome Thoughts" Are Only Inner and Have No Real Impact

* Clarification: In early Buddhist canonical texts, mental action (*yì yè* 意業) is the primary seed of all bodily and verbal actions. * Discursive thoughts of desire, ill-will, and harm (*yù jué, huì jué, hài jué*) may seem harmless while trapped inside one's head. However, the *Saṃyukta Āgama* stresses that these thoughts act as the steering wheel onto the "Left Road" (*zuǒlù*), inevitably conditioning one's words, habits, and ultimate character. Unchecked mental habits are the subtle soil from which coarse evil deeds sprout.

Misinterpretation 4: Narrowing "Unlawful Lust" (*Fēifǎ Yín*) or "Unlawful Greed" (*Fēifǎ Tān*) to Puritanical Taboos

* Clarification: In *Dīrgha Āgama*, when humans decided to eliminate "unlawful lust, unlawful greed, and wrong views" to restore their health and lifespan, it was not about repression or prudery. * *Fēifǎ* (非法) means "contrary to the Dhamma/Law"—that which causes harm, exploits vulnerability, or breaks social trust. It is a call for ethical responsibility and mutual flourishing, recognizing that predatory greed and exploitative sexual conduct destroy the fabric of both individual wellbeing and human society.


Summary: The Path of Turning the Wheel

| Dimension | The Unwholesome Triad (Left Road / *Zuǒlù*) | The Wholesome Triad (Right Road / *Yòulù*) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Root Level (*Gēn* 根) | Greed (*Tān* 貪), Ill-Will (*Huì* 恚), Delusion (*Chī* 癡) | Non-Greed (*Wú Tān* 無貪), Non-Ill-Will (*Wú Huì* 無恚), Non-Delusion (*Wú Chī* 無癡) | | Cognitive Level (*Jué* 覺 / *Vitakka*) | Thought of Desire (*Yù Jué*), Thought of Ill-Will (*Huì Jué*), Thought of Harm (*Hài Jué*) | Thoughts of Renunciation, Non-Ill-Will, Non-Harm (*Wú Yù Jué, Wú Huì Jué, Wú Hài Jué*) | | Social / Ethical Level | Unlawful Lust (*Fēifǎ Yín*), Unlawful Greed (*Fēifǎ Tān*), Wrong View (*Xiéjiàn*) | Right Livelihood, Ethical Restraint, Right View (*Zhèngjiàn*) | | Ultimate Destination | Mind-Entanglement & Lower Realms (*Èqù Nílí*) | Heart-Liberation & Wisdom-Liberation (*Xīn Jiětuō, Huì Jiětuō*) |

By illuminating the Three Unwholesome Dharmas in our daily life, we cease being passive victims of our habitual reactivity. We step off the "Left Road" of ignorance and chart a course toward genuine clarity, emotional freedom, and liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

定义与核心要义

“三不善法”(梵语:trīṇy akuśala-dharmāḥ)是佛教经典中用以概括阻碍众生修行、导致恶趣果报的三种不善心理、言语或行为的术语。在阿含部经典中,这一概念的内涵与表述形式具有多维性。在不同的经文语境下,“三不善法”或指代“非法淫、非法贪、邪见”,或指代“贪、恚、害觉”,或等同于通常所说的“贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴”(在部分语境中亦被称为“三不善根”)。其核心要义在于揭示恶行的心理根源、行为驱动力及其导致的堕落果报,并以此指引众生通过调伏与灭除这些不善法,从而走向解脱。

主要阐述

在《长阿含经》与《杂阿含经》中,对“三不善法”及相关概念的阐述涵盖了其隐喻、产生根源、行为驱动、危害以及灭除之道等多个维度: 1. 道路隐喻与邪道走向:在《杂阿含经》中,世尊曾使用“路人”的隐喻来教导弟子。其中,“不知路者”比喻愚痴凡夫,“知路者”比喻如来。在道路的选择上,“左路”即代表“三不善法”,具体指“贪、恚、害觉”;而选择走这条“左路”,就会导向邪见、邪志、邪语、邪业、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定等八邪道。 2. 产生根源与行为驱动: - 根本源头:经中指出,一切恶不善法皆以“无明”为根本,由无明而集、而生、而起。因为无明(无知),众生不能如实知善与不善法,从而生起邪见,并进一步生起邪志乃至邪定等邪道。 - 行为驱动:众生的恶行(如杀生乃至邪见等十不善业)皆是由这三种不善法驱动而生的,即“从贪生、从恚生、从痴生”。 3. 危害:结缚其心与堕入恶趣:不善法对众生具有极大的危害。在《杂阿含经》中,世尊指出,若成就“贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴”这三不善法,这些不善法就会“结缚于心”,导致众生在命终后堕入“恶趣泥犁”(即地狱)之中。在《长阿含经》关于人类寿命因缘的叙事中,不善法也是导致人类寿命、颜色衰损的直接原因。 4. 灭除与解脱之道: - 调伏与如实知:经中指出,“贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴”是不善法,而“调伏”这些不善法则是善法。圣弟子若能如实知这三种善与不善法,以及十种善与不善法,就能将贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴无余灭尽,从而灭尽一切有漏,证得无漏的心解脱与慧解脱。 - 以“明”为根本:与无明相对,“明”是一切善法的根本。如实知善与不善法即是“正见”,由此能生起正志乃至正定。正定提起后,圣弟子便能正解脱“贪、恚、痴”,并得正智见,断除生死轮回。 - 离不善的驱动:与恶行相反,不杀生乃至离邪见等善行,则是从“不贪生、不恚生、不痴生”中产生的。

不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典部类中,“三不善法”及相关概念的用词和具体定义存在明显的差异: 1. 《长阿含经》(《長阿含經》)的表述: - 三不善法:在该经描述人类寿命因缘的特定叙事中,“三不善法”被具体定义为:“一者非法婬,二者非法貪,三者邪見”。经中提到,当人类寿命为二万岁时,人们为了通过修善来延长寿命,决定灭除这三种不善法,从而使寿命延长至四万岁。 - 三不善根:对于通常意义上的“贪、嗔、痴”,该经更多地使用“三不善根”这一术语,并呈现出两种细微不同的表述形式:其一,表述为“一者貪欲,二者瞋恚,三者愚癡”;其二,在论述“三聚法”时,表述为“貪不善根、恚不善根、癡不善根”。 2. 《杂阿含经》(《雜阿含經》)的表述: - 三不善法/三种不善法:在该经中,“三不善法”在不同语境下有不同的定义。在道路隐喻的语境中,指“贪、恚、害觉”;在论述结缚堕落与调伏解脱的语境中,则指“贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴”。 - 三不善根:该经亦使用“三不善根”这一术语,指“贪不善根、恚不善根、痴不善根”,并将其统称为“不善聚”。

与相关概念的关系

1. 与“三善根”/“三善法”的对立关系: - 在《长阿含经》中,“三不善根”(貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡)与“三善根”(不貪、不恚、不癡)相对立。在“三聚法”的教导中,“三不善根”被明确定义为“趣向恶趣”的三种法(即“三法向惡趣”),而“三善根”(無貪善根、無恚善根、無癡善根)则是导向善趣之法。 - 在《杂阿含经》中,与“左路”的“三不善法(贪、恚、害觉)”相对,代表“右路”的是“三善法——无贪、无恚、无害”。此外,调伏“贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴”被定义为善法。 2. 与“不善聚”及其他不善概念的关联: - 在《杂阿含经》中,“三不善根”(贪、恚、痴不善根)被称为“不善聚”(纯粹不善的积聚),并与“三恶行”(身、口、意恶行)、“三想”(欲想、恚想、害想)、“三觉”(欲觉、恚觉、害觉)等概念并列或相互关联。 3. 与“十不善业”及“十善业”的关系: - 众生的杀生乃至邪见等十种恶行,皆是由“从贪生、从恚生、从痴生”这三种不善法驱动而生的;而离杀生乃至离邪见等十种善行,则是从“不贪生、不恚生、不痴生”中产生的。

代表性原文引用

1. 《長阿含經》卷六:“我等今者寧可共行善法,滅三不善法。何等為三?一者非法婬,二者非法貪,三者邪見。於是,眾生即行善法,盡滅三不善法。行此法時,壽命增長,人壽二萬歲者增至四萬歲。” 2. 《長阿含經》卷八:“如來說三正法,謂三不善根:一者貪欲,二者瞋恚,三者愚癡。” 3. 《長阿含經》卷九:“復有三法,謂三不善根:貪不善根、恚不善根、癡不善根……復有三法向惡趣,謂三不善根。” 4. 《雜阿含經》卷一九:“世尊告低舍:『……左路者,三不善法——貪、恚、害覺。右路者,三善法——無貪、無恚、無害。』” 5. 《雜阿含經》卷二六:“若貪不善根、恚不善根、癡不善根,是名不善聚。……若身惡行、口惡行、意惡行,是名不善聚。若欲想、恚想、害想,是名不善聚。若欲覺、恚覺、害覺,是名不善聚。” 6. 《雜阿含經》卷三八:“若成就三法,其心結縛,命終投于惡趣泥犁中。何等為三?謂貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡。”

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論「三不善法」有兩處,用語與所指各有不同,須分別記錄。

其一,見於轉輪聖王敘事一段。經文述人壽漸增之因:眾生依次修不慳貪、不嫉妬慈心、正見不顛倒,壽命遂由二千歲遞增至萬歲、二萬歲。至二萬歲時,人復作念「當滅三不善法」,經文明列其目為「一者非法婬,二者非法貪,三者邪見」;眾人盡滅此三法後,壽命延長至四萬歲 ``。此處「三不善法」之具體內容為非法婬、非法貪、邪見三項,與通常以貪瞋癡當「三不善根」之用法有別。值得注意的是,此段以「滅」字為動詞(「盡滅三不善法」),強調斷除之行為,而非僅言其體性;且將三不善法置於人倫修善、壽命遞增的敘事脈絡中,屬世間善法漸次增上之一環,尚未涉及出世解脫。同段其後更接孝養父母、敬事師長,乃至彌勒如來出世之預記 ``。

其二,見於眾集(撰集)法數一段。經文以「復有三法」之格式逐組列舉,其中明言「如來說三正法,謂三不善根:一者貪欲,二者瞋恚,三者愚癡」,並緊接對舉「三善根:一者不貪,二者不恚,三者不癡」 ``。此處術語為「三不善根」而非「三不善法」,所指即貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡,與後世通說之貪瞋癡三毒完全對應。同段復以同一格式列出多組相關三法:「三不善行」(不善身行、不善口行、不善意行)、「三惡行」(身惡行、口惡行、意惡行)、「三不善想」(欲想、瞋想、害想)、「三不善思」(欲思、恚思、害思),以及「三火」(欲火、恚火、愚癡火)、「三界」(欲界、恚界、害界)等 ``。此段特色在於以「根」字標明貪瞋癡為諸不善之所依,復以「行、想、思」三層展開其發用,又以「火」喻其燒惱、以「界」言其分域,形成從根本到枝末的完整法數序列。經文並交代此等法數之結集目的:「如來所說,當共撰集以防諍訟,使梵行久立,多所饒益,天、人獲安」 ``。

綜觀本經用語:敘事段稱「三不善法」而實指非法婬、非法貪、邪見;法數段稱「三不善根」而指貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡。二者名近而實異,讀者不宜混同。本經未以「三毒」一詞稱呼貪瞋癡,此為《長阿含經》術語上可留意之處。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「三不善法」見於兩處,用語與切入角度各有不同,須分別記錄。

一、以「覺」立名的三不善法。佛為低舍說法,先就五陰(色、受、想、行、識)逐蘊詰問:若於識「不離貪、不離欲、不離愛、不離念、不離渴」,彼識若變若異,則起憂悲惱苦;反之,離貪、離欲、離愛、離念、離渴,則色雖變異而不生苦。此處五陰之「貪欲」尚屬總說,至譬喻段方正式標出「三不善法」之名:佛以二人同行一路為喻,不知路者譬愚癡凡夫,知路者譬如來、應、等正覺;前二路者謂眾生狐疑;「左路者,三不善法——貪、恚、害覺」;「其右路者,謂三善覺——出要離欲覺、不瞋覺、不害覺」。前行左路者即邪見、邪志、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定。此處術語形式值得注意:經文以「覺」字對應三不善法與三善覺,「貪、恚、害覺」即貪覺、恚覺、害覺三者,與他經逕稱「貪、瞋、癡」的列法不同;本經此段以「恚」而非「瞋」,且第三項為「害覺」而非「愚癡」,所對治的善覺則是「出要離欲覺、不瞋覺、不害覺」,結構上是一一相翻的對治關係,而非以癡為根本的三毒序列。

二、以「貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡」立名的三不善法。佛住舍衛國祇樹給孤獨園時,釋氏子手比丘於舍衛國命終,諸比丘問其生處。佛答:「是手比丘成就三不善法,彼命終當生惡趣泥犁中。何等三不善法?謂貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡。此三不善法結縛於心,釋種子手比丘生惡趣泥犁中。」此段術語形式與前段有別:三項明列為「貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡」,與後世通稱的三毒名目一致;功能上以「結縛於心」說明其繫縛義,果報則直判「生惡趣泥犁中」,屬業果論述而非修道對治論述。

三、兩段對照所見本經特色。同一部《雜阿含經》內,「三不善法」有兩種術語形式:一為「貪、恚、害覺」,配「三善覺」,置於八正道邪正對舉的修道脈絡中;一為「貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡」,以結縛義說輪迴果報。前者以「覺」(尋)為單位、以「恚」稱瞋、以「害」代「癡」;後者用「瞋恚」「愚癡」之全稱。此外,本經稱五蘊為「色、受、想、行、識」而逐蘊分說,稱地獄為「泥犁」,皆為譯者求那跋陀羅(劉宋)的用詞習慣,歸一時宜據此對接。

Related