Dharma · AI Companion

自覺聖智

svapratyātmāryajñāna

圣者内证自心真实境界的智慧。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

楞伽於唯心所现(假有)位立自觉圣智(初立第三重),究极读为离言自证、超绝名相(究竟第四重)

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated


What Is This Concept?

In Buddhist soteriology, particularly within Mahāyāna texts such as the *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* (*Léngqié Jīng* 楞伽經) and the *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* (*Dàchéng Mìyán Jīng* 大乘密嚴經), Zìjué Shèngzhì (自覺聖智)—translated as the Noble Wisdom of Self-Realization or Noble Self-Realized Wisdom—represents the apex of spiritual transformation.

One sentence defines it concisely: **It is the outflowing, undefiled wisdom (*anāsrava-prajñā*) and ultimate inner-realization realm where a noble one (*ārya*) directly observes and awakens to reality firsthand, independent of external instruction or conceptual mediation.**

To fully comprehend *Zìjué Shèngzhì*, we must unpack its four distinct Chinese characters:

1. Zì (自 - Self/By oneself): Indicates non-dependence (*bù yóu tā* 不由於他). Awakening cannot be transferred mechanically like handing over an object, nor can it be realized merely through second-hand knowledge or textual reliance. It is an immediate, direct experience. 2. Jué (覺 - Awakening/Observation): Refers to direct, experiential observation and deep insight (*zìjué guānchá* 自覺觀察), far transcending dry intellectual analysis. 3. Shèng (聖 - Noble/Arya): Distinguishes this wisdom from ordinary worldly cleverness or dualistic intellectual brilliance. It belongs solely to those who have crossed the threshold into non-dual reality (*āryas*), far beyond the grasp of worldly people (*pṛthagjana*), non-Buddhist philosophers, or lower provisional stages. 4. Zhì (智 - Wisdom/Jñāna): Denotes non-conceptual, undefiled wisdom (*nirvikalpa-jñānam*) that penetrates the true nature of reality (*tathatā*), completely freed from cognitive obscurations and emotional afflictions (*kleśa*).

Structure, Scope, and Classical Foundations

Rather than a vague emotion or an abstract theological assertion, the sutras outline *Zìjué Shèngzhì* through rigorous structural frameworks:

1. The Three Aspects of Noble Wisdom (*Shèngzhì Sān Xiāng* 聖智三相)

In the *Lankāvatāra Sūtra*, the path toward this wisdom requires cultivating the three aspects of noble wisdom: * **The Aspect of Non-Existence/Signlessness (*Wú Suǒyǒu Xiāng* 無所有相)**: Transcendence of clinging to the intrinsic existence of any phenomena or conceptual signs. * **The Aspect of the Vow-Realms of All Buddhas (*Yīqiè Zhūfó Zìyuàn Chù Xiāng* 一切諸佛自願處相)**: Aligning inner realization with the boundless altruistic vows of all Buddhas to liberate sentient beings. * **The Ultimate Aspect of Noble Wisdom Itself (*Zìjué Shèngzhì Jiūjìng Xiāng* 自覺聖智究竟之相)**: Reaching the state where one remains entirely unattached to any phenomenal characteristics (*fǎxiāng* 法相), attaining the "illusory samādhi-body" (*rúhuàn sānmèi shēn* 如幻三昧身), and advancing directly through the Buddha-grounds (*būmidhātus*).

2. Transcendence of Cognitive Dualisms and Extreme Views

*Zìjué Shèngzhì* is defined by what it strictly excludes. It requires leaving behind all extremes of speculation: arising, persisting, and ceasing (*shēng zhù miè* 生住滅); identity and difference (*yī yì* 一異); both or neither (*jù bù jù* 俱不俱); existence, non-existence, neither, nor both (*yǒu wú fēi yǒu fēi wú* 有無非有非無); permanence and impermanence (*cháng wúcháng* 常無常). The realm it accesses is the non-arising of all phenomena (*yīqiè fǎ bùshēng* 一切法不生), totally ungraspable by dualistic cognitive frameworks.

3. Core Terminology and Texts: *Lankāvatāra* vs. *Ghanavyūha*

While both classical texts delineate the same ultimate inner realization, they utilize distinct technical lexicons: * **The *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* Framework**: * *Self-Mind Manifestation (*Zìxīn Xiànliàng* 自心現量)*: Emphasizes that all external environments, sensory faculties, and mental constructs are merely projections of one's own mind (*zìxīn xiàn* 自心現). * *The Joys of Noble Wisdom (*Zìjué Shèngzhì Shànlè* 自覺聖智善樂)*: Describes the sublime peace experiencing this state brings. * *Realization-Mastery vs. Preaching-Mastery (*Zōngtōng* 宗通 vs. *Shuōtōng* 說通)*: "Preaching-mastery" (*shuōtōng*) refers to explaining doctrine to others using language and logic. "Realization-mastery" (*zōngtōng*) refers strictly to *Zìjué Shèngzhì*—transcending words and symbols (*yuǎnlí yánsbiō wénzì wàngxiǎng* 遠離言說文字妄想) to enter the uncreated, non-referential inner realm (*wúlòujiè zìjuéde zìxiāng* 無漏界自覺地自相). * *Mind-Created Body (*Yìshēngshēn* 意生身)*: Upon entering the Eighth Bodhisattva Ground (*Acalā-bhūmi*), the practitioner sheds the subtle graspings of the eight consciousnesses, five dharmas, and two selflessnesses, gaining a non-physical "mind-made body" infused with the joy of self-realized wisdom. * **The *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* Framework**: * *The Three Natures (*Sān Xìng* 三性)*: Explains how sensory organs, objects, and mental engagement interact to produce karma and seeds (*bīja*), giving rise to conditional reality—the Other-Dependent Nature (*yītāqǐ xìng* 依他起性). When one deeply realizes noble wisdom and abides in immediate spiritual bliss (*xiànfǎ lèsù* 現法樂住), one realizes the Consummate/Perfected Nature (*yuánchéngshí xìng* 圓成實性), penetrating pure reality (*shíjì* 實際). * *Storehouse Consciousness (*Cángshí* 藏識 / *Ālāiyē* 阿賴耶)*: Highlights that although world systems appear through mental projections and false discrimination, the underlying Storehouse Consciousness (*ālāyavijñāna*) is inherently undefiled (*tǐxìng ér wú rǎn* 體性而無染), radiant, and pure. Direct transformational realization (*zhuǎnyī* 轉依) of this consciousness coincides with *Zìjué Shèngzhì*. * *Not Remaining in Cessation (*Bù zhù shíjì* 不住於實際)*: High-level yogic practitioners who achieve inner realization experience awe toward total personal cessation (*niyāma* / Nirvana without remainder). Rather than lingering in personal quietude, their noble wisdom drives them to non-abiding Nirvana, remaining in the world to liberate others.


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To prevent *Zìjué Shèngzhì* from sounding like an untouchable, abstract metaphysical term, let us trace its cognitive stages through a mundane contemporary scenario: navigating an overwhelming workday while receiving an aggressive message from a colleague or client on a messaging app.

``` [External Event: Aggressive Message Appears] │ ▼ 1. Form Realm (Sè) ─────────► Pixels, light, physical phone in hand. │ ▼ 2. Sensation (Shòu) ────────► Sudden bodily tension, visceral spike of anger/anxiety. │ ▼ 3. Perception (Xiǎng) ──────► Cognitive categorization: "This is an insult/attack!" │ ▼ 4. Volition (Xíng) ─────────► Impulsive urge to retaliate, type a sharp reply. │ ▼ 5. Consciousness (Shí) ─────► Subject-object split: "I (victim) vs. THEM (aggressor)". │ ├───────────────────────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ [Path A: Delusion & Karma] [Path B: Shift Toward Zìjué Shèngzhì] - Believe projection as absolute reality. - Recognize "Self-Mind Manifestation" (Zìxīn Xiàn). - Escalate feud, internalize stress. - Observe projections arise/pass without identity attachment. - Act with unshakeable clarity and non-reactive compassion. ```

Stage 1: The Trap of Projections (*Zìxīn Xiàn* 自心現)

Your phone buzzes with a notification. Your eyes register light patterns on a glass screen (Form / *Sè* 色). Instantly, unpleasant bodily sensations surge (Sensation / *Shòu* 受). Your mind immediately labels the text: "They are disrespecting my work!" (Perception / *Xiǎng* 想). An urge to type an angry counter-attack ignites (Volition / *Xíng* 行), and the sense of an aggrieved "I" standing against a hostile "Other" solidifies (Consciousness / *Shí* 識).

*Where the common mistake occurs:* Most people assume the hostility, insult, and threat exist *objectively inside the text message itself*. They treat their subjective emotional projection as an absolute external reality.

Stage 2: Moving from Conceptual Preaching (*Shuōtōng*) to Inner Insight (*Zōngtōng*)

Suppose you have read dozens of books on emotional intelligence, mindfulness, or Buddhist philosophy. You tell yourself mentally, *"I shouldn't be angry; anger is an illusion; Buddhism teaches non-self."*

This intellectual maneuvering is merely **Preaching-Mastery (*Shuōtōng* 說通)**. You are using words, logic, and self-talk to suppress or manage your reaction. Yet underneath, the anger still simmers because your core awareness has not actually shifted.

Stage 3: The Awakening of *Zìjué Shèngzhì*

Now, imagine a profound shift in awareness occurs directly in that silent moment (*dúyī jìngchù* 獨一靜處—which can happen in an instant, even amidst a noisy office):

1. **Seeing "Self-Mind Manifestation" (*Zìxīn Xiànliàng* 自心現量): You directly perceive that the anger, the threat, the imagined catastrophe, and even the rigid sense of an "injured self" are mental interpretations generated inside your own mind—much like a projection on a cinema screen. 2. Severing Dualistic Extremes (*Yuǎnlí Jìan Wàngxiǎng* 遠離見妄想)**: You stop framing the situation in rigid dualisms ("I am completely right, they are completely evil", "This ruins my career vs. I must win this argument"). You see that these conceptual labels lack inherent existence (*wú suǒyǒu xiāng* 無所有相). 3. **Penetrating to the Consummate Nature (*Yuánchéngshí Xìng* 圓成實性)**: The habitual reactive pattern collapses. Beneath the turbulent surface thoughts, you touch the inherently pure, undisturbed awareness of the Storehouse Consciousness (*cángshí tǐxìng ér wú rǎn* 藏識體性而無染). 4. Acting via Wisdom, Not Reaction: Independent of what anyone tells you to do (*bù yóu tā* 不由於他), a clear, calm, and fearless resolution arises spontaneously. You reply to the message with precision, dignity, and zero trace of defensive malice.

You did not force yourself to be calm through intellectual coercion; rather, direct, non-conceptual realization transformed the entire cognitive landscape from within.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Modern society faces a crisis not of information, but of cognitive immersion and conceptual entanglement. Contemporary life exposes us to constant algorithmic streams, curated media narratives, and hyper-reactive social dynamics.

1. Breaking the Tyranny of Algorithmic Projections

Algorithms on social media and news feeds are specifically engineered to hijack our lower consciousness (*vijñāna*), triggering reactive emotions, outrage, and tribal dualisms ("Us vs. Them"). Modern humans spend their lives fighting phantom projections on screens, believing them to be solid realities.

*Zìjué Shèngzhì* acts as the ultimate cognitive liberation. By training awareness to recognize "Self-Mind Manifestation" (*zìxīn xiàn*), an individual stops mistaking digital constructs and psychological interpretations for unalterable facts. It provides an unshakeable internal anchors amidst digital chaos.

2. Moving Beyond "Second-Hand Existence"

Contemporary culture encourages second-hand living. We rely on experts, influencers, self-help manuals, and search engines to tell us how to feel, think, and live. We collect intellectual data without ever gaining authentic, direct insight.

The core emphasis of *Zìjué Shèngzhì* is **"Not depending on another" (*bù yóu tā* 不由於他)**. It reminds us that reading about peace is not peace; collecting spiritual jargon is not awakening. True psychological freedom requires direct, personal verification (*zìjué guānchá*) of our own mental landscape.

3. A Dialogue with AI and Cognitive Neuroscience

Contemporary neuroscience and AI supply useful analogies for understanding cognitive processing, though key differences exist:

* Predictive Processing vs. Self-Mind Manifestation: Neuroscience confirms that the brain does not passively record the external world; it actively constructs reality based on predictive models and sensory inputs. This closely parallels the Yogācāra doctrine of "Self-Mind Manifestation." * **Large Language Models (LLMs) vs. *Shuōtōng* vs. *Zōngtōng***: An AI language model possesses an unprecedented degree of "Preaching-Mastery" (*shuōtōng*)—it can organize texts, quote sutras, and analyze logic flawlessly. Yet, an AI has zero "Realization-Mastery" (*zōngtōng* / *Zìjué Shèngzhì*). It operates entirely on symbolic manipulation without subjective awareness, phenomenal experience, or non-conceptual insight.

Crucial Distinction: Science and technology analyze consciousness from an external, third-person perspective (objective observation, brain scans, data algorithms). *Zìjué Shèngzhì*, by contrast, is a first-person, non-dual, experiential realization. Neuroscience maps the neurological wiring of the brain, but it cannot "experience" the undefiled, non-conceptual reality (*tathatā*) from within. Science describes the mechanics of the lantern; *Zìjué Shèngzhì* is the inner awakening to the light itself.

Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "Is *Zìjué* just subjective intuition, gut feeling, or self-centered personal opinions?"

Clarification: Absolutely not. In modern usage, "self-awareness" or "following your self-intuition" often means trusting your personal emotions, individual preferences, or egoic gut instincts.

*Zìjué Shèngzhì* is the exact opposite of egoic subjective opinion. The classical sutras state clearly that *Zìjué Shèngzhì* arises only when one **leaves behind self and self-property (*liān wǒ wǒsuǒ* 離我我所), abandons false conceptualizations (*liān jiàn wàngxiǎng* 離見妄想), and transcends the graspings of the eight consciousnesses**. Ordinary "gut feelings" are usually conditioned reactions rooted in subconscious seed-impressions (*bīja*) stored in the *ālāyavijñāna*. *Zìjué Shèngzhì* is the undefiled, non-egoic light that shines *after* those conditioned reactions are thoroughly seen through and transformed.

Misinterpretation 2: "If it is 'independent of others' (*bù yóu tā*), does that mean I don't need teachers, doctrines, or ethics?"

Clarification: This is a dangerous misinterpretation known as spiritual narcissism or anti-intellectualism. The sutras specify that *Zìjué Shèngzhì* is attained through diligent practice of the path (*qín xiūxué* 勤修學), including studying the teachings, cultivating ethical discipline, and abiding in quiet contemplation (*dúyī jìngchù* 獨一靜處).

"Not depending on another" (*bù yóu tā*) means that while a teacher can point out the road (like pointing a finger at the moon), the actual seeing of the moon must be done with your own eyes. Listening to instructions (*shuōtōng*) is the essential map; *Zìjué Shèngzhì* (*zōngtōng*) is arriving at the destination yourself.

Misinterpretation 3: "Is *Zìjué Shèngzhì* an isolated, mystical trance where one escapes the world permanently?"

Clarification: No. The *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* explicitly points out that high-level yogic practitioners who realize this inner realm experience awe regarding total personal quietude (*niyāma*). Consequently, **they refuse to remain stuck in ultimate cessation (*bù zhù yú shíjì* 不住於實際)**.

Because their realization is non-dual, true *Zìjué Shèngzhì* does not seek escape from daily life into a quietistic cave. Instead, it empowers the practitioner to embody the "illusory samādhi-body" (*rúhuàn sānmèi shēn*), returning continuously to the messy, dynamic world of everyday life to act with unshakeable wisdom, grace, and boundless altruism.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》(《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》)中,“自觉圣智”是指菩萨摩诃萨在独一静处,自觉观察,不由于他,远离见妄想,上上升进并入于如来地的境界。此境界超越了凡夫、外道及声闻、缘觉的妄想执着。

在《大乘密严经》(《大乘密嚴經》)中,此智慧被称为“现法乐住自觉圣智”,是诸佛在无量庄严佛刹中为菩萨宣说的究竟之法,属于“大涅槃界究竟之法”,是超越欲界、色界、无色界及无想有情界的不可思议自证境界。

二、 主要阐述

1. 修学路径与远离二边:在《楞伽经》中,菩萨欲达到自觉圣智境界,应当勤修学“圣智三相”(无所有相、一切诸佛自愿处相、自觉圣智究竟之相)。其中“自觉圣智究竟相”表现为对一切法相无所计着,得如幻三昧身,进趣诸佛地处。欲得此智,必须远离生住灭、一异、俱不俱、有无非有非无、常无常等恶见妄想。自觉圣智所趣是“一切法不生”的境界,非愚夫妄想的二境界。

2. 唯识三性与现法乐住:在《密严经》中,从唯识三性角度阐释。根、境、意和合熏习成种子,由此生起诸识,这种互相资助的因果力量称为“依他起”。而当修行者“善证自觉智,现于法乐住”时,即是证得“圆成”之性,这正是“众圣之境界”,证得此法者即能见到“实际”,断尽一切烦恼、戏论与过患,入于无漏的“密严之妙国”。

3. 内证与不住实际:修习胜瑜伽的行者在听闻密严无畏法后,能获得“自觉圣智”及“内证之境界”。此时,他们会“怖于尼夜摩及正位之乐”,因而“不住于实际”,而是在定中互相观察,继续行持菩萨道。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

1. 名相术语差异: - 《楞伽经》(《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》)使用其独特的译语系统,如以“阴、界、入”指代五蕴、十八界、十二处(如“离阴界入”);而《大乘密严经》(《大乘密嚴經》)则使用“藏识”、“阿赖耶”、“末那”及“七识”等唯识术语。 - 《楞伽经》频繁使用“自心现量”或“自心现”表达万法唯心(如“善分别自心现”,“不知如梦自心现量”);《密严经》则多用“识现”与“妄分别”。 - 对于自觉圣智的称呼,《楞伽经》常表述为“自觉圣智善乐”;《密严经》则有“自觉圣智”、“自觉智”、“自证境”及“内证之境界”等。 - 在终极真理的表述上,《密严经》常使用“实际”或“实际真如”;而《楞伽经》则强调“宗通”以指代“自觉地自相”。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与意生身的关系:在《楞伽经》中,菩萨通过成就“善分别自心现、观外性非性、离生住灭见、得自觉圣智善乐”四法,可得修行大方便。当住于第八菩萨地,转舍“心、意、意识、五法、自性、二无我相身”,并获得“意生身”时,即能得自觉圣智善乐。

2. 与藏识的关系:在《密严经》中,虽然世间皆是识现,但“藏识”本身“体性而无染”,普现于有情界且圆洁常光明。若能对藏识“正而了知”,便能获得无漏的“转依位”差别,远离我、我所,达致无分别心,这与证得自觉圣智、圆成实性完全一致。

3. 与宗通的关系:《楞伽经》划分“宗通”与“说通”,“宗通”即是“缘自得胜进相,远离言说文字妄想,趣无漏界自觉地自相”,此即自觉圣智的内证特质。此外,自觉圣智境界是“过世间望”的,无以为譬,超越了“心、意、意识”所见之相。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》:“自觉圣智相者,谓菩萨摩诃萨独一静处,自觉观察,不由他悟,离见妄想,上上升进,入如来地,是名自觉圣智相。” 2. 《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》:“大慧!宗通者,谓缘自得胜进相,远离言说文字妄想,趣无漏界自觉地自相,远离一切虚妄觉相,降伏一切外道众魔,是名宗通相。” 3. 《大乘密严经》:“于无量庄严诸佛刹中,为诸菩萨说现法乐住自觉圣智,远离分别实际真如,大涅槃界究竟之法。” 4. 《大乘密严经》:“根境意和合,熏变生种子,由此生诸识,是名依他起。善证自觉智,现于法乐住,是则名圆成,此双众圣境。”

By SutraAI-generated

楞伽阿跋多羅寶經T0670 · 經集部

《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》以「自覺聖智」為全經核心概念,指聖者內證之究竟智慧,非言說思辨所能及。經中佛告大慧:「我當為汝說,自覺之境界」,開宗即以此為所說主旨。其性質為「一切法不生,自覺聖智趣境界者,一切性自性相不生,非彼愚夫妄想二境界」,即超越生滅、有無等二邊對立,非凡夫妄想所能觸及。經中又謂「自覺聖智境界,無以為譬,真實如來,過心、意、意識所見之相,不可為譬」,明此智境超越心意意識,無任何譬喻可及。

經中特立「聖智三相」以攝此智之修學綱要:無所有相、一切諸佛自願處相、自覺聖智究竟之相。其中「自覺聖智究竟相者,一切法相無所計著,得如幻三昧身,諸佛地處進趣行生」;三相成就,「能到自覺聖智境界」。此為本經獨特之安立,以三層遞進說明從離外道聲聞相、經諸佛本願處、至究竟自證之完整路徑。

在修行實踐上,經中說菩薩成就四法得修行者大方便:善分別自心現、觀外性非性、離生住滅見、得自覺聖智善樂。其中第四法之具體證得,須「得無生法忍,住第八菩薩地,得離心、意、意識、五法、自性、二無我相,得意生身」;而後「隨所憶念本願境界,為成熟眾生,得自覺聖智善樂」。是知自覺聖智之證入,以無生法忍為階位基礎,以意生身自在利生為其大用。

本經又從「宗通」與「說通」之辨彰顯自覺聖智之離言本質:「宗通者,謂緣自得勝進相,遠離言說文字妄想,趣無漏界自覺地自相,遠離一切虛妄覺想,降伏一切外道眾魔,緣自覺趣光明暉發」。偈頌亦云:「自覺聖智子,實際我所說」,謂唯自覺聖智者方契如來所說之實際。經中更明言如來施設言教乃方便,「令離心、意、意識故,不為得自覺聖智處」,教下指歸正在覺自心現量、離二妄想,而非以言說本身為究竟。

在遮遣面上,大慧所請即為「一切外道所不行,自覺聖智所行,離妄想自相共相,入於第一真實之義」。經中以陽炎、乾闥婆城、夢境、明鏡等喻廣破凡夫外道依一異、俱不俱、有無等見而起之妄想計著,結歸「欲得自覺聖智事,當離生住滅、一異、俱不俱、有無非有非無、常無常等惡見妄想」。

術語方面,本經以「藏識」稱通常所謂阿賴耶識,如「藏識攝、所攝相轉」;以「自心現量」表萬法唯心所現之義;以「意生身」稱菩薩自在化身;「五法自性」為本經特有之合稱。此等用語皆為本經獨特之術語形式。

大乘密嚴經T0682 · 經集部

《大乘密嚴經》論「自覺聖智」,主要將之安立為諸佛菩薩內證之究竟境界,並與密嚴剎土、圓成實性、法樂住、三摩地等義互為表裏。

其一,自覺聖智是諸佛為菩薩所說之究竟法。經中佛告如實見菩薩,十方無量佛剎中,諸佛咸為菩薩「說現法樂住自覺聖智,遠離分別實際真如,大涅槃界究竟之法」。此處以「現法樂住」與「自覺聖智」連舉,並標舉「遠離分別」「實際真如」「大涅槃界」為其內容,顯示此智非尋常分別之知,而是離分別、契真如之現證。又稱佛菩薩「猶如虛空住自證境」,以「自證境」點出此智自內所證、不可限量之性格。

其二,自覺聖智與圓成實性、依他起相貫通。經以偈頌說「善證自覺智,現於法樂住,是即說圓成,眾聖之境界,佛及諸佛子,證此名聖人」。此處明言:能善證此自覺智者,即是圓成實性,為眾聖所行之境界;佛與佛子正因證此法而得名「聖人」。「聖」之得名即繫於此智之證得,是本經一獨特之用語關聯。其下復說「若人證斯法,即見於實際」,乃至「我生盡」「不受後有」「解脫一切苦」,將自覺智之證與解脫、斷惑、見實際相貫。

其三,此智以唯識無境之觀行為所依。經廣說根境意和合、熏習成種、諸識由此而生,屬「依他起」;又說末那緣藏識「如磁石吸鐵」,染意執取阿賴耶,增長我、我所;並喻身相器世間「如火輪垂髮,乾闥婆之城,不了唯自心,妄起諸分別」。結論謂「此三皆識現,於斯遠離處,是即圓成實」。可見本經之自覺聖智,並非別有一物可得,而是於依他、遍計之識現處遠離分別,即顯圓成實;此與「善證自覺智,是即說圓成」前後呼應。

其四,自覺聖智為瑜伽行者定中所證,並與密嚴剎相即。經說欲生密嚴剎者「善習勝瑜伽」;月幢如來所說「密嚴無畏法」,彼諸瑜伽者「聞說如是已,得自覺聖智,內證之境界」。此處以「自覺聖智」與「內證之境界」對舉,正顯此智自內所證之義。彼等既得此智,「怖於尼夜摩及正位之樂,不住於實際」,復於定中互相觀察、思惟何者為定、何所定、以何為緣,顯示證此智者不滯於寂滅之樂,而於定中起觀行。

其五,此智之歸趣在密嚴妙國。經說證此法者「入於無漏界,密嚴之妙國」,此土「唯佛與菩薩清淨之所居,三摩地現前,以此而為食」;又說菩薩「住自證境來密嚴剎」。是故本經之自覺聖智,自證境、圓成實、法樂住、密嚴剎數義環環相扣:以離分別之自覺智證圓成實,現法樂住,究竟歸於密嚴無漏之剎。

Related