Dharma · AI Companion

樂覺

sukha-saṃjñā

对境领会为快乐的觉想。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In Buddhist Āgama sutras (*Āgama* 經典), 樂覺 (*sukha-saṃjñā* / *sukha-vedanā*, Perception/Sensation of Pleasure) refers to the subjective awareness, perception, and feeling of a pleasant state of body and mind.

To grasp its full significance in the path of liberation (*mokṣa-mārga* 解脫道), one must first understand its place in early canonical terminology and psychological structure:

1. Translation Nuances in the Agamas

In early Chinese translations, translator conventions varied considerably: * In the *Mādhyama Āgama* (*中阿含經*, translated by Saṅghadeva in the Eastern Jin period), the second of the Five Aggregates (*pañca-skandha* 五蘊)—typically translated as *vedanā* (受, sensation/feeling)—was rendered as (*jué*, sensation/apprehension). Furthermore, the twelve links of dependent origination (*pratītyasamutpāda* 十二因緣) saw the link of *sparsa* (觸, contact) translated as 更樂 (*gèng-lè*, pleasurable/sensory contact). Thus, what standard texts call "pleasant feeling arising from pleasant contact" (*sukha-samphassa-ja-sukha-vedanā*) was rendered in the *Mādhyama Āgama* as: *"Pleasurable contact generating pleasurable apprehension"* (因樂更樂故生樂覺). * In the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (*雜阿含經*, translated by Guṇabhadra in the Liu Song dynasty), the terms 樂覺 (*sukha-saṃjñā*) and 樂受 (*sukha-vedanā*) are used side by side. While interchangeably representing pleasant experiences, *樂覺* specifically highlights the *cognitive awareness and mental apperception* that accompanies the raw feeling.

2. The Chain of 生起 (Origination) and Its Innate Overhaul

The Āgamas define the exact causal chain of pleasure: $$\text{Contact with a pleasant object (樂更樂 / 樂觸)} \longrightarrow \text{Sensory & Mental Pleasure (樂覺 / 樂受)}$$

When sense faculties meet a agreeable object, pleasurable contact (*sukha-samphassa* 樂觸) occurs, giving rise to *樂覺*.

However, early Buddhism dissects the hidden defect (*ādīnava* 過患) of this state: *樂覺* is inherently impermanent (*anicca* 無常), subject to suffering (*dukkha* 苦), and bound to cessation (*nirodha-dhamma* 滅法). As the nun Dharmadinnā (*法樂比丘尼*) summarized in the scriptures: > *"Pleasure brings joy while it arises and persists, but turns into suffering upon changing"* (樂覺生樂住樂,變易苦).

The fundamental danger of *樂覺* lies in its relationship with latent tendencies (*anusaya* 隨眠). When ordinary beings experience pleasure, because they do not see its impermanent, conditioned nature, the dormant disposition of lust/greed (貪欲使 / 貪欲隨眠, *rāgānusaya*) is immediately triggered. Bound by this latent craving, the mind clings to past pleasures, hankers after future ones, and stagnates in present ones—trapping the individual across the three times (*tryadhvan* 三世).

Furthermore, failing to see that *樂覺* is a transient, dependent process leads to existential delusion: individuals misidentify the felt pleasure or the perceiving mind as a permanent self ( / , *ātman*). Consequently, when the feeling inevitably fades, they suffer existential panic and tumble into the false view of self-annihilation (*uccheda-dṛṣṭi* 斷見 / 神滅).

3. Noble vs. Unnoble Perspectives: The Paradox of "世間之所樂,觀察悉為怨"

The scriptures highlight a radical split between ordinary worldly people (*pṛthagjana* 凡夫) and noble ones (*āriya* 聖者): * Worldly Beings & Devas: Enraptured by the six sense fields (color, sound, smell, taste, touch, and mental objects), they view sensory indulgence as supreme bliss (*樂著* / *樂世心*). Yet when these impermanent conditions break apart, they endure catastrophic despair. * Noble Saints: Equipped with transcendental wisdom (*paññā* 慧), noble ones observe that what the world clings to as pleasure is actually an enemy in disguise (*世間之所樂,觀察悉為怨*). They recognize worldly pleasure as impermanent friction, viewing its cessation (*nirodha* 滅) as true peace. "What the world calls joy, the noble ones see as suffering; what the world finds agonizing, the noble ones experience as peace."

4. Discrimination and Transcendence: To Cut Off vs. To Cultivate

The Agamas do not issue a naive, blanket rejection of all joy. The Buddha made a crucial pragmatic distinction between pleasure that should be abandoned (*應斷*) and pleasure that should be cultivated (*應修*): * To Abandon: Any *樂覺* that causes unwholesome states (*akusala-dhamma* 惡不善法) to increase and wholesome states (*kusala-dhamma* 善法) to decrease must be eliminated. This includes sensory pleasures tied to greed, hostility, or intoxication. * To Cultivate: Any *樂覺* that causes unwholesome states to decrease and wholesome states to increase ought to be developed. A prime example is the joy of the first meditative absorption (*prathamadhyāna* 初禪), known as "rapture and pleasure born of seclusion" (離生喜樂, *pīti-sukha* born of *viveka*). Because this meditative pleasure replaces sensual craving with wholesome mental unification, it does not feed the latent disposition of lust (*貪欲使*).

Ultimately, the practitioner uses wholesome, meditative joy as a stepping stone to cool the mind. By observing five bases (*五界*) with insight, the underlying trigger of "pleasurable contact" (*樂更樂*) is extinguished. Deprived of fuel, *樂覺* fades into tranquil coolness, leading to the ultimate state: *"Pleasurable feeling ceases, and the mind becomes unmovable"* (亦樂受盡,心不移動)—attaining Nibbāna in this very life (*現法盡諸漏*).


生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see how *樂覺* operates in modern life, let us trace its micro-mechanics across everyday scenarios—and pinpoint where we usually misinterpret what is happening.

``` [External Stimulus / Contact] ↓ (樂觸 / 樂更樂) [Physiological & Cognitive Perception] ↓ (樂覺 / 樂受) [Unaware Mind + Latent Greed] ↓ (貪欲使 / 樂世心) [Attachment & Clinging] ↓ (變易 / 滅盡) [Disappointment, Anxiety & Suffering] (變易苦) ```

Scenario 1: Late-Night Doomscrolling & Recommendation Algorithms

* The Process: You lie in bed after an exhausting day and open a short-video app. A algorithmically tailored video pops up: a hilarious clip or satisfying craft video. * Classical Mapping: 1. 樂更樂 (Pleasurable Contact): Eye faculty meets high-dopamine digital pixels; mind faculty processes novelty. 2. 樂覺 (Perception of Pleasure): A warm surge of entertainment, relief, and sensory amusement fills your awareness. 3. 貪欲使 (Latent Tendency of Greed): Without mindfulness, the hidden impulse of craving fires up. You swipe up again and again, hungry for the next hit. 4. 變易苦 (Suffering through Change): When 2:00 AM arrives, the videos lose their charm, leaving you with dry eyes, late-night guilt, and brain fog. The initial comfort transforms into exhaustion. * Common Mismapping: People say, "Social media ruined my night." They project the problem outward onto the smartphone. In reality, the smartphone merely provided the sensory contact (*樂觸*); the real trap was the unobserved *樂覺* unleashing the underlying latent greed (*貪欲使*).

Scenario 2: The Praise email and "Self-Validation"

* The Process: You receive a glowing email from your director congratulating you on a successful project, CC'ing the entire executive committee. * Classical Mapping: 1. 樂更樂 (Pleasurable Contact): Ear/eye contact with admiring words and prestige. 2. 樂覺 (Perception of Pleasure): A wave of pride, validation, and emotional warmth. 3. 見神 (Misidentifying Pleasure as Self): You internalize this temporary feeling: "I am brilliant. My status is secure." You anchor your identity (*我* / *神*) into this ephemeral cloud of praise. 4. 變易苦 (Suffering through Change): Two weeks later, a minor critique arrives in a meeting. Because you mistook the temporary *樂覺* of praise for your enduring self-worth, the criticism feels like an existential destruction of "self" (*神滅*), sparking defensiveness or severe anxiety. * Common Mismapping: People think, "Confidence comes from constant positive feedback." Buddhism reveals that deriving identity from transient *樂覺* builds confidence on shifting sand.

Scenario 3: Parenting and "Living Through the Child"

* The Process: A parent watches their child perform flawlessly on stage or secure top grades, feeling immensely proud and overjoyed. * Classical Mapping: 1. 樂覺 (Perception of Pleasure): The joy and relief of seeing a child succeed. 2. 應修 vs. 應斷 (To Cultivate vs. To Abandon): * If this joy is pure empathetic goodwill (*muditā* 隨喜), it brightens the mind and reduces self-centeredness—this is a wholesome *樂覺* to be cultivated (*應修*). * If this joy devolves into possessing the child, boasting to peers, or demanding the child maintain high performance to sustain the parent's vanity, it turns into *樂世心* (worldly attachment). It triggers *貪欲使* (greed) and fear of failure, transforming into severe pressure on the child and anguish for the parent when grades drop (*變易苦*).


Why Modern People Need It

Modern culture operates as a hyper-engineered engine designed to monetize *樂覺*. Every notification bell, sugar hit, luxury brand, and streaming queue is crafted to produce pleasurable contact (*樂觸*) and trigger latent craving (*貪欲使*).

Why do we need the Āgamic insight into *樂覺* today?

1. Escaping the Hedonic Treadmill: Neuroscience speaks of "hedonic adaptation"—the brain rapidly desensitizes to dopamine hits, requiring ever-larger rewards to achieve the same pleasure. Early Buddhism diagnosed this millennia ago: because *樂覺* is impermanent (*無常*) and changing (*變易*), chasing it as an ultimate goal guarantees perpetual dissatisfaction (*dukkha*). Understanding *樂覺* stops us from running endlessly on the consumer treadmill. 2. Cognitive Liberation from Algorithmic Manipulation: When you understand that *樂覺* is simply an arising sensation triggered by contact (*因樂更樂故生樂覺*), you gain a micro-second buffer. When your phone buzzes or an impulse strikes, instead of automatically reacting via latent greed (*貪欲使*), you can observe the *樂覺* rise and fall like a bubble in water. You reclaim agency over your attention. 3. Redefining True Well-being: Society tells us that happiness equals maximum pleasant sensations minus painful ones. The Āgamas offer a radical alternative: true, unshakable peace (*清涼 / 心不移動*) does not come from hoarding pleasant feelings, but from freeing the mind from attachment to feelings altogether.

Neuroscientific Analogies and Their Boundaries

Modern neuroscience offers intriguing parallels: dopamine is not the molecule of satisfaction, but of *anticipation and craving*, mirroring how pleasurable contact (*樂觸*) awakens latent tendencies (*貪欲使*). When dopamine drops, the mind experiences discomfort, mirroring *變易苦*.

*Caution and Boundaries*: While brain chemistry illustrates how physical faculties (*rūpa* 色) interact with feelings (*vedanā* 受), neuroscience does not "prove" or replace Buddhadharma. Neuroscience operates within a materialist framework, measuring neural correlates, whereas early Buddhism treats *樂覺* within a holistic soteriological framework aimed at ending rebirth and realizing Nibbāna. Brain scans can track dopamine pathways, but they cannot measure the spiritual freedom of a mind that has extinguished unwholesome latent tendencies (*現法盡諸漏*).


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

Misunderstanding 1: "Buddhism claims all pleasure is evil and must be suppressed."

Clarification: The Agamas never advocate emotional repression or blanket condemnation of joy. The Buddha explicitly differentiated between pleasures to be cut off (*應斷*) and pleasures to be cultivated (*應修*). Healthy worldly joys (such as honest earning, debtlessness, or ethical living) and spiritual joys (such as meditative absorption, loving-kindness, and tranquility) are praised. What early Buddhism instructs us to eliminate is not the pleasant feeling itself, but the *clinging, delusion, and latent greed* (*貪欲使*) that attach to it.

Misunderstanding 2: "樂覺 (Sukha-saṃjñā) is just a fancy synonym for standard 'happiness'."

Clarification: In everyday English, "happiness" is a vague umbrella term. *樂覺* in the Āgamas is an exact psychological phenomenon: the cognitive perception (*saṃjñā* 想/覺) and sensation (*vedanā* 受) arising from sense contact (*sparsa* 觸). It sits within a precise causal chain of dependent origination. Translating it loosely as simple "happiness" obscures its precise place in the mechanics of mental defilement and liberation.

Misunderstanding 3: "If pleasure causes suffering when it changes, the ideal state must be cold, unfeeling numbness."

Clarification: The goal of Buddhist practice is not apathy or emotional anesthesia. When a practitioner transcends attachment to *樂覺*, the result is not dead numbness, but profound clarity, spaciousness, and unshakeable peace (心不移動 / 清涼). Freed from the needy search for sensory hits, the mind becomes naturally warm, imperturbable, and capable of genuine, unselfish compassion.

Misunderstanding 4: "Transcending 樂覺 requires abandoning all normal work and family life."

Clarification: The Agamas record many lay disciples (*upāsaka* / *upāsikā*) who lived active lives in society while practicing mindfulness of feelings (*vedanānupassanā* 念受). Transcending *樂覺* does not require running away from enjoyable moments—eating a delicious meal, enjoying family time, or finishing a project. It means experiencing those moments with open awareness: enjoying them fully when present, seeing their impermanent nature (*無常*), and letting them pass without building a rigid self-identity around them.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「乐觉」(sukha-saṃjñā)是佛教阿含部经典中的重要概念,指对快乐境界的感知、觉知与体验。在经典中,乐觉常与「乐受」交替或并行使用,既指涉身心所感受到的安乐,也包含伴随此感受而起的觉知与心想。阿含经典从无常、苦、空的角度剖析乐觉的本质,指出世俗乐觉具有变易生苦的过患,易使众生起贪欲随眠;同时,经典也区分了世俗染着之乐与修行所生的离欲之乐,引导修行者透过如实观察与智慧调伏,超越对乐觉的执着,最终证得不移动的解脱真乐。

二、主要阐述

1. 乐觉的生起与本质过患

根据经典论述,乐觉的生起与「更乐」(触)密切相关。当乐更乐(乐触)所触时,便会生起相应的身心乐善觉,这就是乐觉。然而,乐觉本质上是「无常法、苦法、灭法」。其特征在于「生乐住乐,变易苦」,即在生起和维持时虽带来快乐,但因其无常性,一旦发生变易灭尽,便会转化为痛苦,这也是其「灾患」所在。

众生在觉知乐觉时,往往因为内在的「贪欲使」(贪欲随眠)所驱使,无法如实了知其无常本质,因而深陷于执着之中,无法看清并找到出离解脱的道路。若对过去、现在、未来的觉(包括乐觉)产生乐着与停留,就会落入三世的束缚。此外,若将无常的乐觉误视为「神」(自我),在乐觉灭去时,便会产生「神灭」的邪见与恐慌。

2. 世俗乐着与圣凡视角的对立

世俗众生与诸天对于色、声、香、味、触、法等六境,一向生起喜悦并深陷于爱染与乐着(「乐着」或「乐世心」)之中,以此为乐。然而,当这些境界变易灭尽时,便会产生极大的痛苦。

对此,贤圣与凡夫有着截然相反的观察。圣者能以智慧观察到世间所乐之处实际上皆是怨家(「世间之所乐,观察悉为怨」),并以「见其灭」为真正的快乐;凡夫眼中的乐,在圣者看来是苦,而凡夫所苦之处,在圣者看来反而是乐。众生若放任心灵随外缘流驰,产生「乐世心」与「不正念」,这种对世俗快乐的染着会使欲心浊乱,污染心灵。

3. 乐觉的断除、修习与超越

经典对乐觉并非一味否定,而是作了精细的区分。佛陀指出,乐觉有「应断」与「应修」之别:若觉乐觉时,导致「恶不善法转增,善法转减」,则此乐觉应当断除;若能使「恶不善法转减,善法转增」,则此乐觉应当修习,这一原则同样适用于身乐与心乐的修治。例如,比丘通过离欲、离恶不善法而证得初禅的「离生喜乐」,这种乐觉因能断除贪欲,故不属于「欲使」。

为了获得真正的解脱,修行者应当舍弃对乐与不乐的执着,以及一切与贪欲相关的觉想。比丘应当勤奋精进,以正智保持不动转,对包括乐受、苦受、不苦不乐受在内的一切受,皆能以智慧悉知悉觉。当修行者能以慧观如实知五界,灭除「乐更乐」(乐触),因其而生的「乐觉」也会随之灭息,如同火失去薪柴般归于清凉,最终达到「亦乐受尽,心不移动」的如实解脱境界。此时,修行者在当下断尽一切烦恼(「现法尽诸漏」),命终时不再堕入生死轮回,永处般涅槃。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典与译本中,「乐觉」及相关概念的译语呈现出鲜明的时代与部派特色: 1. 「觉」与「受」的译词交替:在《中阿含经》(东晋僧伽提婆译)中,通常佛教经典中的「五蕴」被表述为「色、觉、想、行、识」,即以「觉」字指代「受」;因此,「乐受」在该经中被系统性地译为「乐觉」。而在《杂阿含经》(刘宋求那跋陀罗译)中,则同时出现「乐觉」与「乐受」两种表述。例如在描述众生被贪欲使役而无法出离时, 使用了「乐觉所觉时,莫能知乐觉」,而 则在完全平行的语境中使用了「乐受所受时,则不知乐受」。这表明在《杂阿含经》的译语系统中,「乐觉」与「乐受」在特定语境下具有相通的内涵,但「乐觉」更侧重于伴随感受而起的觉知与心想。 2. 「触」的译词差异:十二因缘中的「触」,在《中阿含经》中被译为「更乐」,因此「乐触」在该经中表述为「乐更乐」。而在其他经典中则多直接译为「触」或「乐触」。 3. 「乐着」与「乐世心」:在《杂阿含经》中,对于世俗快乐的执着,除了使用「乐着」外,还使用了「乐世心」、「染乐着」等词,用以描绘心灵随外缘流驰、被欲心浊乱的状态。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「苦觉」的关系:在法义的相对关系上,乐觉是以「苦觉」为其直接对立面的。在《杂阿含经》中,亦常将「乐觉」与「苦受」或「苦觉」并列讨论,以显示众生在面对不同境遇时的心理反应。 2. 与「更乐」(触)的关系:乐觉的生起以「更乐」为前提。因乐更乐(乐触)故生乐觉,若乐更乐灭,则乐觉亦随之灭息。 3. 与「欲使」(贪欲随眠)的关系:一般的世俗乐觉与「欲使」紧密相连,众生因受乐觉而起贪欲随眠。然而,并非所有乐觉都与欲使相应,如初禅的「离生喜乐」等修道所生之乐,则不属于欲使。 4. 与「神」(自我)的关系:若修行者未能如实知乐觉的无常性,易将「觉」误视为「神」(自我),从而产生「神即是觉」或「神灭」的邪见。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》:「若乐更乐所触生,身心乐善觉,是觉谓乐觉也。……乐觉生乐住乐,变易苦。……乐觉无常者即是灾患。」 2. 《中阿含经》:「因乐更乐故生乐觉。……若以慧观如实知此五界者,彼于此五界不复见神及神所有。彼如是知、如是见,乐更乐灭,因乐更乐所生乐觉亦灭、亦息、清凉、真实。」 3. 《杂阿含经》:「乐觉所觉时,莫能知乐觉,贪欲使所使,不见于出离。」 4. 《杂阿含经》:「乐受所受时,则不知乐受,贪使之所使,不见出要道。……如此一切受,慧者能觉知,觉知诸受已,现法尽诸漏,身死不堕数,永处般涅槃。」 5. 《杂阿含经》:「一向生喜悦,爱染深乐着。诸天及世人,唯以此为乐,变易灭尽时,彼则生大苦。贤圣见苦者,世间以为乐,世间之所苦,于圣则为乐。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》以「覺」字統稱感受,區分為三覺:樂覺、苦覺、不苦不樂覺,三覺皆緣「更樂」(觸)而生。

一、樂覺的定義與性質。法樂比丘尼答毗舍佉優婆夷問,釋樂覺為:「若樂更樂所觸生,身心樂善覺,是覺謂樂覺也」,可知樂覺乃緣可意之樂更樂所生之身心樂受,本質為善覺。經中復明其自性:「樂覺者,生樂住樂,變易苦,無常者即是災患,欲使也」——生時與住時皆樂,一旦變易即成苦,以無常為災患,以欲為驅使者(使)。

二、樂覺的無常與非我性。世尊告阿難,三覺皆為「無常法、苦法、滅法」。當覺樂覺時,餘二覺(苦覺、不苦不樂覺)暫滅;待樂覺滅時,不應視為「神」之滅,從而破除外道執覺為神之見。此經論述自我時用「神」字,而非常見之「我」字,乃此經獨特用詞。

三、樂覺之生起與滅盡。經中以「更樂」(接觸)為覺所因生之緣:「因更樂則便有覺」;「比丘!因樂更樂故生樂覺,彼覺樂覺……若有比丘滅此樂更樂,滅此樂更樂已,若有從樂更樂生樂覺者,彼亦滅息止,知已冷也」。復以火母因鑽木生火、摩擦止則火冷為喻,說明「彼彼更樂故生彼彼覺,滅彼彼更樂故彼彼覺亦滅,彼知此覺從更樂……依更樂行」。

四、樂覺之修與不修。世尊教誡比丘:若有覺樂覺者,「惡不善法轉增,善法轉減」,則此樂覺當斷;若覺樂覺時「惡不善法轉減,善法轉增」,則此樂覺當修;同樣原則適用於苦覺之修斷。世尊明言:我不說修一切身樂,亦不說莫修一切身樂,乃隨其於善不善法之增減而決定修斷。

五、樂覺之對與驅使。法樂比丘尼說:樂覺以苦覺為對;樂覺、苦覺共以不苦不樂覺為對。驅使者雖通說為「欲使」,然有例外:若比丘離欲、得初禪成就遊,所受之樂覺非欲使,「所以者何?此斷欲故」,可見經中區分染著之樂覺與離染之樂覺。

此經之獨特用詞:以「覺」代「受」、以「更樂」代「觸」、以「神」代「我」、以「使」稱煩惱之驅動,與他經常見譯名不同。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本部經以偈頌形式論述「樂覺」之義,從三受——即對快樂、苦與不苦不樂三種感受之覺知——的角度展開闡明。

一、樂覺與貪欲使的繫縛關係

經文首先指出:「樂覺所覺時,莫能知樂覺,貪欲使所使,不見於出離」()。此即說明,當行者面對快樂之覺受時,因被貪欲之煩惱使所驅使,無法如實知曉樂覺之真實相狀,因此不能見於出離之道。此處用「使」字標示煩惱之驅迫性,與「貪欲」並稱「貪欲使」,顯示經文將「樂覺」之不覺直接歸因於貪欲煩惱之現行。此乃本經論「樂覺」之核心表述:樂覺之不能自知,乃繫於貪欲使之現行;不見出離,亦由此煩惱使所遮。

二、三受並舉以顯對治之等齊

經文接著以同樣句式論述苦受與不苦不樂受:「苦受所覺時,莫能知苦受,瞋恚使所使,不見出離道」(),以及「不苦不樂受,等正覺所說,彼亦不能知,終不度彼岸」()。三受皆被繫以煩惱使——樂受配貪欲使、苦受配瞋恚使——強調凡夫於三受皆不能知、不能度。經文以「等正覺所說」標示不苦不樂受,顯示此「捨受」乃佛陀所施設之教說範疇,與樂覺之覺受對舉並列;此一並列方式,乃本經論「樂覺」之獨特側面:樂覺非孤立之境,乃三受中之一環,須與苦受、不苦不樂受同觀。

三、以精勤、正智、黠慧為對治

經文後半轉入對治之方:「若比丘精勤,正智不傾動,於彼一切受,黠慧能悉知」()。此處以「精勤」標示行持之勤奮,「正智不傾動」標示智慧之堅住,「黠慧」標示對三受之微細照見,三者並用,說明唯有如此方能於一切受如實了知。此處所用「黠慧」一詞,乃本部經用以指稱對受之微細揀擇之智,與「正智」相輔,「正智不傾動」為定中之智不為境搖,「黠慧能悉知」為觀照之智遍知諸受,二者並舉乃本經之特殊術語組合。

四、其果:現法盡漏、涅槃不墮

經文最後揭示究竟果證:「能知諸受已,現法盡諸漏,依慧而命終,涅槃不墮數」()。知受而後漏盡,命終依慧而非依惑,涅槃之果乃可不墮於有數之流轉。此處「漏」、「涅槃」皆為阿含部常用術語,而「依慧而命終」一語尤為獨特,顯示本經將究竟解脫歸於智慧之圓滿,而非徒依戒定之力。「現法盡諸漏」一語,則凸顯此經主張於現生即可斷盡煩惱,無待後世。

綜上,本經論「樂覺」之核心,乃在凸顯凡夫於樂覺之不覺乃因貪欲使所驅使,而對治之道在於以精勤、正智、黠慧照見三受之實相,終得現法涅槃之果。本經所用「使」、「黠慧」、「漏」、「涅槃」等術語,皆為阿含部常見之表達。

Related