Dharma · AI Companion

靈臺

灵台,譬喻本心自性灵明而能照,清净莹彻,不假外缘。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

禅宗本心,直指离言

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

"Numinous terrace" (靈臺, língtái) is not a building, not an organ, and certainly not the "inner self" of pop psychology. It comes from Chan Buddhism — specifically, from the important Caodong school (曹洞宗) master Hongzhi Zhengjue (宏智正覺, 1091–1157), who repeatedly uses it as a metaphor in the *Guanglu of Chan Master Hongzhi* (《宏智禅师广录》): comparing that inherently numinous, perceiving, clear and translucent aspect of the original mind and self-nature (本心自性, svabhāva) to a "terrace" — an open, elevated, unobstructed ground of luminous awareness that needs no seeking outside.

The character "terrace" (台) is well chosen. A terrace is empty, open, unobstructed; add "numinous" (靈), and it becomes a "numinous terrace" — a place that can illuminate all things without being stained by any of them. Below, we unfold this "terrace" layer by layer according to the classical definition.

Level One: Substance — "Numinous" and "Luminous" as Two Sides

Master Hongzhi uses three characters to sketch the essence of this terrace: numinous (靈), luminous (明), illuminating (照).

- "Numinous" (靈): the empty and still numinous knowing — "empty yet numinous without reliance on conditions; still yet awake without reliance on thought" (虚无缘而灵。寂无思而觉). It is empty, arising from no external condition; it is still, awakening without deliberation. So "numinous" is not a mysterious psychic power, nor a supernatural ability, but that quality which is not determined by conditions and is awake of itself. - "Luminous" (明): the translucent self-illumination — "vast and self-numinous; pure and self-luminous" (廓而自灵。净而自明). It is its own light source, needing no borrowed light. So "luminous" is not good eyesight or mental clarity, but that quality which needs no kindling because it is itself already light. - "Illuminating" (照): the universal, non-grasping illumination — "able to illuminate universally without the labor of grasping illumination; able to discern clearly without the burden of conditioned thought" (能普遍而无取照之功。能分晓而无缘想之累). It can illuminate everything universally, yet has no function of "illuminating by grasping"; it can discern everything distinctly, yet carries no burden of "clinging and imagining." This sentence deserves special attention: "non-grasping illumination" does not mean not illuminating — it means illuminating without seizing the object, without adhering to the image.

Together, these three characters form what he calls "numinous without obstruction; luminous without something illuminated — this may be called empty and self-luminous" (其灵而无所碍。其明而无所照。可谓虚而自明) — empty and therefore self-luminous: empty, so it lights itself. If it were something, it could not be self-luminous; if it were dark, it would need external light. The numinous terrace is precisely the point where "emptiness" and "luminosity" hold at once.

Level Two: Metaphor — The Mirror

This is the most vivid dimension of the numinous terrace in Master Hongzhi's writing. Throughout the *Guanglu*, he repeatedly uses mirror and mind-mirror (心鑑) to describe it:

- "Clear, vast, translucent and luminous; each thing illuminating itself" (清旷莹明。历历自照) — the mirror surface is clear, vast, translucent, and luminous, seeing itself. - "No defilement obscures me; the ten thousand dharmas are the mind's light" (诸尘不为我翳。万法乃是心光) — defilements come but do not obscure; the ten thousand dharmas are themselves the display of the mind's light. - "Responding in the moment, not grasping marks; illuminating in place, not touching conditions" (应时不取相。照处不涉缘) — when it is time to illuminate, it illuminates, without grasping marks or clinging to conditions. - "Mirroring without mind; acting without self-interest" (无心而鉴。无私而作) — only a mirror without private thoughts and distractions reflects truly.

Why does the mirror metaphor matter? Because the mirror's characteristics happen to trace the four boundaries of the numinous terrace:

1. The mirror illuminates everything, but the mirror grasps nothing — black passes before the mirror, and the mirror keeps no black; white passes before the mirror, and the mirror keeps no white. So too with the numinous terrace: afflictions (煩惱, kleśa) come, and it sees them; afflictions leave, and no trace remains. 2. The mirror has no "self," yet the mirror works distinctly — the mirror does not know it is a mirror, yet it reflects faithfully. So too with the numinous terrace: "vastly solitary, numinously without dependence" (廓然独存,灵然绝待) — independent, without opposition, yet no "I" subject is operating it. 3. The mirror's luminosity does not come from the mirror "trying" to be bright — a mirror need only be clean to reflect naturally. So the practice of the numinous terrace is not "making it brighter" but "restoring its original cleanliness." 4. When the mirror reflects things, the mirror itself is not stained — this is the meaning of "no defilement obscures me." The numinous terrace is not a fragile little self in need of protection; it is by nature unstained.

The mirror is not passive — it reflects precisely, leaving nothing out. Nor is the mirror active — it has no preference, no plan. So the eight characters "mirroring without mind; acting without self-interest" are the most accurate description of the numinous terrace.

Level Three: Origin — "Mother of All Transformation"

The numinous terrace is not merely a description of a clear psychological state. It is positioned as originary:

- "Mother of all transformation" (为一切造化之母) — the root-ground from which all change and becoming arises. - Among its various names pointing to the same thing, the terms "original boundary" (本際, bhūtakoṭi) and "original truth" (本真) especially highlight this dimension: the numinous terrace is the boundary that has always been there (际), the truth that has always been true (真). It is not some state you cultivate into being; it is the luminous awareness present before, during, and after the appearance of the ten thousand dharmas.

This dimension matters because it directly determines "where practice should be directed" — since the numinous terrace is already there, practice is not "building something from nothing" but restoring the dust-covered mirror surface to its original state.

Level Four: Practice — Polishing

This is the dimension of the numinous terrace most easily misread by modern people, so it deserves special attention.

Master Hongzhi says: "Everyone has it, yet cannot polish it clear and bright. Dim and unaware, they flow along as delusion covers wisdom. One thought illumines through, and one surpasses kalpas of dust" (人人有之。而不能磨砻明净。昏昏不觉。为痴覆慧而流也。一念照得破。则超出尘劫) — everyone has the numinous terrace, but it is covered by delusion (痴, moha), and the original wisdom (慧, prajñā) flows away into dullness. One thought of illumination breaks through, and one surpasses countless kalpas of dust.

Practice has three keywords:

- Polishing (磨砻) — grinding, rubbing, abrading. It is subtraction, not addition. When dust is on the mirror, you do not apply another coat of brightness; you wipe the dust off. - Scouring (揩磨) — "single-mindedly scouring this one field" (一味揩磨此一片田地). "Field" (田地) is another name, comparing the mind-ground to a field. When weeds grow in a field, you do not plant more crops; you pull the weeds. - Sweeping (扫荡) — "polish and wash until flawless; sweep and clear until no blemish remains" (磨洗无瑕。扫荡绝颣). Sweep it completely clean, leaving not a single flaw.

So the core direction of this practice is: not making the mirror brighter, but restoring the brightness it always had.

Level Five: Different Names, Same Referent — Why Not Just Call It "Numinous Terrace"

It is worth noting that Master Hongzhi does not always use the two characters "numinous terrace" directly; he more often uses mind-ground (心地), field (田地), mind-mirror (心鑑), original boundary (本際), original truth (本真) and similar terms for the same thing:

- Mind-ground / field (心地/田地): emphasizes the aspect of "this field of mind needs cultivation." - Mind-mirror (心鑑): emphasizes the "mirror" aspect — illuminating without grasping. - Original boundary / original truth (本際/本真): emphasizes "the boundary that has always been there and the truth that has always been true."

This tells us an important fact: the numinous terrace is a metaphor, not an exclusive proprietary term. Its content is "the numinous luminosity of the original mind and self-nature"; the name is merely an entry point.


Walking Through Daily Life

Many people, hearing "numinous terrace," immediately think of "that clear state when sitting in meditation" — which narrows it. The essence of the numinous terrace is luminous awareness that is already there. It is not only on the meditation cushion; it is working in every moment — at work, on the commute, scrolling your phone, arguing, raising children. Below, we walk through several concrete scenarios strictly according to the classical definition.

Scenario One: Someone Steps on Your Foot on the Commute

The event: being stepped on, pain, the other person not responding, anger rising.

Walking through it per the classical definition: - "Numinous" (靈): You know what happened without needing any reason — this is the empty, still, numinous knowing. It is not something you "thought up"; it is spontaneously present. - "Luminous" (明): From the event's occurrence to your reaction, the whole process is perfectly clear, needing no external light. Pain, anger, the other person's face, the presence of passersby — all illuminated in an instant. - "Illuminating" (照): universally illuminating without the labor of grasping — all of this is illuminated, yet the numinous terrace does not "hold on to the person who stepped on you." The mirror sees the person who stepped on you, but the mirror does not hold him. - "Responding in the moment, not grasping marks; illuminating in place, not touching conditions" (应时不取相。照处不涉缘): the image is perfectly clear, but it does not cling or adhere. When the next person boards at the next stop, the mirror surface illuminates something new. - "No defilement obscures me" (诸尘不为我翳): this event cannot stain the numinous terrace itself. Even if you are furious, the anger is only content being illuminated; the mirror surface remains the mirror surface. - "Mother of all transformation" (为一切造化之母): even your anger, your breathing, the entire process of deciding whether to speak — all of it appears on this terrace of luminous awareness.

What you find after walking through it: You do not need to "stop being angry" to return to the numinous terrace. The numinous terrace has been there illuminating the whole time. It is your narrative — "How could he do that?" "I'm having such bad luck today" "I need to make him apologize" — that picks up the image on the mirror and starts telling a story. The "I" telling the story is not the numinous terrace; the mirror itself tells no stories.

Scenario Two: Refreshing Your Phone at Midnight

You're scrolling late at night when you suddenly realize you're anxiously refreshing — news, social media, replies, messages — your thumb can't stop.

Walking through it: - "Everyone has it, yet cannot polish it clear and bright" (人人有之。而不能磨砻明净): everyone has this illuminating capacity — the capacity to "know I'm anxiously scrolling." It is only covered by delusion (inertia, dependency, avoidance), so the fingers slide on without your knowing. - Polishing (磨砻): stopping, taking a deep breath, putting the phone farther away — this is "scouring the field." It is not about making you "more spiritual"; it is wiping off a layer of dust so you can reconnect with the self that has always known what should and should not be done. - "One thought illumines through" (一念照得破): no need to struggle for an hour. One thought — that single thought of "I'm anxiously scrolling again" being clearly illuminated — is enough to break through the fog. Whether to continue afterward is another matter; but the mirror surface has recovered a moment of clarity. - "Mirroring without mind" (无心而鉴): the numinous terrace is not telling you to "indifferently put down the phone." It lets you see the anxiety without being driven by it. The mirror sees fire; the mirror need not rush to extinguish it, nor add fuel.

The most common mis-mapping: equating the numinous terrace with "that voice in the mindfulness app that says 'I notice I'm anxious.'" That voice is the narrative self — it is still inside the story. The numinous terrace is not in the story; the numinous terrace is the stage on which the story is performed.

Scenario Three: Nervous Before a Work Presentation

Standing outside the meeting room, palms sweating, mind full of "what if I mess up?"

Walking through it: - "Vast and self-numinous; pure and self-luminous" (廓而自灵。净而自明): the you that is nervous, gripped by "fear of the future," is not the numinous terrace. The numinous terrace is the openness in which you can see even the nervousness itself clearly at this very moment. - "Round and interfused yet luminous; numinous, penetrating, and wondrous" (圜混而明。灵通而妙): nervousness, preparation, the briefing, the heartbeat — all of this is "round and interfused," a fused whole. Luminous awareness need not take them apart for inspection; it illuminates numinously, penetratingly, wondrously as a whole. - "Polish and wash until flawless" (磨洗无瑕): in the thirty seconds before the presentation, dropping your shoulders, closing your eyes for a moment, letting the breath return to the present — this is not "becoming brave"; it is letting the mist on the mirror surface disperse a little. - "Single-mindedly scouring" (一心揩磨): "deep breathing" is not a strategy of "I will conquer my nervousness"; it is wiping the mirror without judgment.

The most common mis-mapping: equating the luminosity of the numinous terrace with "the composure of an expert who stays calm under pressure." Composure is a self-state cultivated through discipline; the numinous terrace is not a self-state — it is the terrace-ground that gives rise to all states, including composure and including panic.

Scenario Four: Conflict in an Intimate Relationship

Your partner says something harsh, and you immediately want to strike back, or immediately want to retreat.

Walking through it: - "No defilement obscures me; the ten thousand dharmas are the mind's light" (诸尘不为我翳。万法乃是心光): that harsh sentence is "dust." It arrives at the terrace of your mind, and you see it clearly — but it cannot obscure the terrace itself. At the same time, this very sentence is itself part of the light (心光, mind-light) displayed by your own mind, not an enemy invading from outside. - "Responding in the moment, not grasping marks; illuminating in place, not touching conditions" (应时不取相。照处不涉缘): you need not seize that sentence and ruminate on it all night (grasping marks), nor pretend not to have heard it (avoiding conditions). Illumination is illumination; after illuminating, the mirror surface is clean. - "Vastly solitary, numinously without dependence" (廓然独存。灵然绝待): the numinous terrace takes neither your side nor the other's. It is vast — boundless, utterly impartial. So what you say from the numinous terrace is not a "winning" word nor a "losing" word, but a word spoken from the place that no longer needs to win or lose. - "Mother of all transformation" (为一切造化之母): conflict itself is transformation. The numinous terrace is the mother-ground that allows this transformation to occur and to be illuminated — not something that ends conflict, but the field in which conflict can arise and dissolve.

Scenario Five: Exhaustion with a Child

The child is crying ceaselessly, you are at your limit, and the thought flashes through your mind: "Am I a good mother / good father?"

Walking through it: - "Everyone has it" (人人有之): the exhaustion is real, the irritation is real, the love is real — they all appear simultaneously on the numinous terrace. The numinous terrace denies none of them. - "Able to discern clearly without the burden of conditioned thought" (能分晓而无缘想之累): it can discern — the child's crying is truly tiring, my irritation is truly irritating — but it need not be dragged along by conditioned thoughts like "am I a good parent?" - "Polish it clear and bright" (磨砻明净): "let me calm down first" is not "I must become a calm parent," but letting the mist on the mirror surface disperse a little, so you can see that behind the child's crying may be hunger, may be fear — rather than only seeing "I've lost control again." - "Mirroring without mind; acting without self-interest" (无心而鉴。无私而作): the mirror holds no expectation of "what I must be" toward the child. It simply reflects. When you let go of the image of "what kind of parent I must be," what remains is seeing — and seeing itself often gives rise to the appropriate response.


Why Contemporary People Need It

We live in an age of information explosion, attention being auctioned off, and the self being continuously commodified. It is precisely these characteristics of our age that make "numinous terrace" — this ancient metaphor — especially urgent.

First: We do not lack content; we lack a clean mirror. The contemporary person's greatest predicament is not not knowing what to do — we are bombarded by countless methodologies, self-help books, parenting guides, and meditation apps. The real problem is: our minds are like a mirror covered in fingerprints, grease, and dust, seeing everything blurred. We look at wealth and see anxiety; at relationships and see control; at the self and see self-doubt. The mirror is not broken; the mirror is dirty. The numinous terrace reminds us: the direction is not outside, but in "polishing" this mirror of mind.

Second: The trap of self-improvement. Contemporary mainstream culture is built almost entirely on the premise of "becoming a better self" — the premise itself is not bad, but it easily becomes a more refined grasping: grasping at an "upgraded me," and then forever dissatisfied with the present. The direction of numinous terrace practice is the reverse — not adding on, but wiping inward; not becoming something else, but restoring what is originally there. For a person exhausted from shouting "growth" as a slogan, this is true respite.

Third: Neuroscience's resonance and its limits. Contemporary neuroscience finds that the nature of attention is closer to a "spotlight" — it can illuminate only one range at a time, and this focusing capacity is finite and needs recovery. This has a surface resonance with the "empty and therefore self-luminous" and "able to illuminate universally without grasping" of the numinous terrace: attention's "luminosity" and its "emptiness" (not occupying, not clinging to an object in order to switch) are the same thing.

But to be honest: neuroscience can describe the brain's attention mechanism; it cannot argue for ontological claims like "original mind and self-nature" (本心自性). The neuroscientific version of the mirror metaphor is "a healthy attention network"; the numinous terrace goes further — it is not merely "the attention network functioning well," but the ground of luminous awareness in which all phenomena appear. The former is at the psychological level; the latter is at the ontological level. Equating the two is a common contemporary oversimplification.

Fourth: The mirror metaphor in the AI age. The nature of a language model is also a kind of "mirror" — it is a mirror reflection of its training data, itself grasping nothing, understanding nothing, taking no marks (at least according to current mainstream theory). This analogy is interesting: the AI's "illumination without grasping" is purely mechanical, purely passive; the human numinous terrace's "illumination without grasping" is alive, self-luminous. A machine reflects because its algorithm is so; the mind-mirror illuminates because that is what it has always been. This difference is precisely why "numinous terrace" deserves to be raised again in the AI age — reminding us: a human being is not a reflection device; a human being is a ground of self-luminous awareness. But equally, this analogy can only go so far — AI has no "awareness" (覺); that is the fundamental divide between it and the numinous terrace.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: "Numinous Terrace" = the Psychological "Inner Self" or "Psyche"

Clarification: "Psyche" (心灵) in modern psychology is the aggregate term for emotion, personality, and self-consciousness. The numinous terrace is not at this level. It is the terrace-ground on which these phenomena appear — not the content itself, but the place where the content is performed. Reading the numinous terrace as "my inner world" reduces it to an object, whereas the numinous terrace is precisely that non-objective quality in which all objects are illuminated.

Misreading Two: "Numinous Terrace" = the New Age "Higher Self," "True Self," "Higher Self Consciousness"

Clarification: The "higher self" in New Age contexts is a more advanced version of the self — a "me" that is higher, wiser, more sacred than the small self. But the numinous terrace in Master Hongzhi's writing is precisely without self (無我, anātman) — "vastly solitary, numinously without dependence" (廓然独存。灵然绝待): there is no "I" subject operating there. The mirror does not know it is called a mirror, yet it reflects faithfully. Reading the numinous terrace as "a more powerful me" turns it from an open luminous awareness into a super-self — moving further from it, not closer.

Misreading Three: "Numinous Terrace" = Cleverness, Intellectual Clarity

Clarification: The "luminosity" of the numinous terrace is not the "brightness" of IQ. The mirror illuminates everything — the genius's idea and the fool's behavior alike — it is equally luminous toward all. If "luminosity" meant cleverness, it would discriminate and select — but "able to discern clearly without the burden of conditioned thought" (能分晓而无缘想之累) precisely means it discerns everything without being burdened by the discernment. Clever people also have afflictions, also misjudge people, also take wrong paths, because cleverness is an image on the mirror surface, not the mirror itself.

Misreading Four: "Numinous Terrace" = Inner Peace, Tranquility

Clarification: When the mirror reflects the sea, the sea surface is calm; when the mirror reflects a storm, the wind and waves churn. The mirror itself has never been calm or uncalm — only luminous or not luminous. So the numinous terrace is not an emotional state — it is not "I am calmer today, so I am closer to the numinous terrace." The luminous awareness that remains clearly clear even in a storm is closer to the description of the numinous terrace than sitting quietly in sunshine. Reading the numinous terrace as "inner peace" makes people think they must avoid turbulence to approach it — when in fact the opposite is true.

Misreading Five: "Polishing" = Self-Improvement, Personal Growth

Clarification: This is the most critical misreading. The words "polishing" (磨砻), "scouring" (揩磨), and "sweeping" (扫荡) all point to subtraction — wiping the dust off the mirror, pulling the weeds from the field. Not painting a new coat of lacquer on the mirror to make it look brighter. Contemporary "personal growth" discourse is usually additive: add one more skill, one more certification, one more habit, optimize one more aspect. The practice of the numinous terrace is exactly the opposite — subtract, until what has always been there appears. So a person who cultivates the numinous terrace is not "becoming more capable" but "becoming less — so little that the originally luminous mind finally shows through."

Misreading Six: "No-Mind" = Not Caring, Coldness, Detachment

Clarification: "No-mind" (无心) in "mirroring without mind; acting without self-interest" is not "numbness" or "coldness" — that is merely another way of being obscured (a kind of dust called "coldness"). The mirror's no-mind is freedom from biased attachment, yet with complete clarity. It illuminates everything, so it is concerned with everything — but this concern does not come from a self-image of "I must be a caring person"; it comes from luminous awareness itself. Reading it as coldness is reading a human being as a machine; its opposite is not "passion to the point of frenzy" but "clear enough to respond fully."

Misreading Seven: The Numinous Terrace Is a "State" One Can Attain

Clarification: Master Hongzhi's wording is "everyone has it" (人人有之) — everyone already has it. It is not an advanced state you enter only after completing cultivation. It is here, right now, as you read these words — numinously illuminating these words, these characters, these concepts, your doubt, your understanding, your fatigue. You do not need to attain it; you need only see that it has always been there. What is called "practice" is merely wiping off the layer of dust so that you can see the thing that has been illuminating all along. This is the deepest — and most easily overlooked — point of the numinous terrace metaphor: it is not a destination; it is the point of departure, the home you have never left.


To close, the reason the word "numinous terrace" is moving is that it says something extremely deep with a single mirror. Everyone's mind has always been like this — open, numinously luminous, grasping nothing, providing the place for all things to appear. All our cultivation, all our cleaning, all our "polishing" is not to produce it, but finally to be willing to acknowledge that it has always been there. All that remains is wiping off the dust.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「灵台」一词,在《宏智禅师广录》中用以譬喻本心之灵明能照之性。此录直言「其灵而无所碍。其明而无所照。可谓虚而自明」,将灵台定位为不假外缘、本自灵照的本心。其核心特性在于「灵」与「明」互为表里:灵故能廓然无碍,明故能莹彻自照,合而言之则为本心之清净本体。

二、主要阐述

(一)灵明之体性

此录屡屡以「灵」「明」「照」三字勾勒灵台之体性。一方面言其虚寂灵知:「虚无缘而灵。寂无思而觉」,又云「廓而自灵。净而自明」,描述灵台之灵明乃自性本具,非由思虑缘想而来。另一方面言其圆妙无穷:「圜混而明。灵通而妙」,又言「灵而明廓而莹。照彻体前。直得光滑净洁。着不得一尘」,揭示灵台之照乃无取无照之照,普遍而无分别之累:「能普遍而无取照之功。能分晓而无缘想之累」。诗偈中亦云「本际灵明自照神」、「灵照心空合未萌」,皆以灵明自照为此心体之写照。

(二)以镜为喻的独特侧面

此录反复以镜、心鉴为喻,描写灵台之照物无取:「清旷莹明。历历自照」、「净磨心鉴绝游尘」,并明言「诸尘不为我翳。万法乃是心光」。镜之能照不在于追逐外物,而在「历历诸尘。枵然无所偶」、「应时不取相。照处不涉缘」。故灵台之照是「无心而鉴。无私而作」之照——廓然独存、灵然绝待,是「为一切造化之母」的本源性明觉。

(三)工夫指向

此录之论灵台非仅本体描述,更含实践指向:「人人有之。而不能磨砻明净。昏昏不觉。为痴覆慧而流也。一念照得破。则超出尘劫」,故须「发明心地也。共是一灯。洞照灵台也。更无异影」、「磨洗无瑕。扫荡绝颣」、「一味揩磨此一片田地」,令灵台之明自得复元。盖灵台之照,贵在「磨砻」后的本来莹明,非从外求。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

今所依据之材料仅出《宏智禅师广录》(诸宗部·《宏智禪師廣錄》)一部,故无不同部类间之表述差异可比,亦无同经异译本之歧异。然在此录内部,灵台之表述呈现出丰富的异名同指现象:此录并非处处径用「灵台」二字,更多以「心地」「田地」「心鉴」「本际」「本真」等异名同指此清明之本心:「唯廓照本真」、「影像那涴吾灵台」,「灵台」与「心地」「心鉴」「本际」交替出现,皆指向同一能照之本心,构成此录独特的术语风貌。

四、与相关概念的关系

灵台之与「心地」「心鉴」「本际」「本真」「田地」等概念,在《宏智禅师广录》中实为异名同指之关系,皆用以指称本心之清明能照之性。其中:

「心地」「田地」侧重此心作为修行之田亩,须经「揩磨」「磨洗」方显其明;「心鉴」以镜为喻,强调其照物而不取相之功能;「本际」「本真」侧重其本源性与绝待性,为「一切造化之母」。诸名异用而同体,皆围绕灵台之灵明而展开。

五、代表性原文引用

- 「其灵而无所碍。其明而无所照。可谓虚而自明。」 - 「灵而明廓而莹。照彻体前。直得光滑净洁。着不得一尘。」 - 「虚无缘而灵。寂无思而觉。」 - 「廓而自灵。净而自明。」 - 「圜混而明。灵通而妙。」 - 「能普遍而无取照之功。能分晓而无缘想之累。」 - 「本际灵明自照神。」 - 「灵照心空合未萌。」 - 「清旷莹明。历历自照。」 - 「诸尘不为我翳。万法乃是心光。」 - 「历历诸尘。枵然无所偶。」 - 「应时不取相。照处不涉缘。」 - 「无心而鉴。无私而作。」 - 「为一切造化之母。」 - 「人人有之。而不能磨砻明净。昏昏不觉。为痴覆慧而流也。一念照得破。则超出尘劫。」 - 「发明心地也。共是一灯。洞照灵台也。更无异影。」 - 「磨洗无瑕。扫荡绝颣。」 - 「一味揩磨此一片田地。」 - 「唯廓照本真。」 - 「影像那涴吾灵台。」

By SutraAI-generated

宏智禪師廣錄T2001 · 諸宗部

《宏智禪師廣錄》論「靈臺」,明文點出之處雖少,而以此概念為核心的「靈明」「廓照」之說遍佈全錄,呈現宏智禪師對本心自性瑩徹照用之體悟。

其一,「靈臺」之直指。全錄直引「靈臺」本詞者見於兩處:一為「發明心地也,共是一燈,洞照靈臺也」,以「洞照」形容心地發明後此臺之瑩然照徹,無有異影;一為「眾生世界了如幻,影像那涴吾靈臺」,以「涴」字點明靈臺本不被幻化影像所染,眾生世間如影像然,終不能污此清淨之臺。此二處為本錄對「靈臺」一詞之正面使用。

其二,「靈明」之展開論述。本錄圍繞靈臺之體性,多以「靈明」「廓照」展開:謂「其靈而無所礙,其明而無所照,可謂虛而自明,明而自淨」,此明超越因緣、離於能所,非言象擬議可及;又言「虛無緣而靈,寂無思而覺」,「乃佛祖出沒化現、誕生涅槃之本處也」,而「人人有之,而不能磨礱明淨,昏昏不覺,為癡覆慧而流也」;更云「廓而自靈,淨而自明」,「能普遍而無取照之功,能分曉而無緣想之累」,「出有無表,超思議情,唯證相應,不從人得」。

其三,照用與磨治之並重。本錄非徒描述體性,更提示須以揩磨使靈臺瑩徹:言「田地虛曠,是從來本所有者,當在淨治揩磨去諸妄緣幻習,自到清白圓明之處」,「靈而明廓而瑩,照徹體前,直得光滑淨潔,著不得一塵」。偈頌中亦云「淨磨心鑑絕游塵,本際靈明自照神」,「塵勞排遣廓而明,靈照心空合未萌」,「廣堂清白照蒲團……光明不掉寸心寒」,皆以磨治之心鑑喻本際靈明之自照。

其四,術語特色。此錄以「靈臺」直指本心自性,亦常以「靈明」「廓照」「瑩明」「本際」「心地」並用,未見另立異名,與概念定義中「本心自性靈明而能照,清淨瑩徹,不假外緣」正相呼應。

Related