Dharma · AI Companion

修戒

śīla-bhāvanā

学习并增长清净戒行AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the modern popular imagination, "precepts" (戒, śīla) are often equated with monastic rules, moral constraints, or even an external doctrine that suppresses desire. Yet in the Buddhist path of liberation, 修戒 (śīla-bhāvanā, "the cultivation of ethical restraint") is by no means a rigid moral sermon. Rather, it is the cultivation, upholding, and purification of one's conduct, speech, and psychological protection. It is the foundational cornerstone by which a practitioner untangles the body-mind from its bonds, bears the profound teachings of dependent origination and emptiness, and ultimately awakens to buddha-nature.

To fully understand "修戒," one must clarify the four core dimensions established in the classical scriptures and treatises:

1. Structural Position: The Fourfold Cultivation (Body, Precepts, Mind, Wisdom) and the "Ladder" Metaphor

In early scriptures such as the Āgamas, the cultivation of precepts never exists in isolation; rather, it forms a complete system of liberation together with "修身 (cultivating the body), 修戒 (cultivating precepts), 修心 (cultivating the mind), and 修慧 (cultivating wisdom)."

* 修身 (cultivating the body): guarding and rectifying the gates of the physical senses so that they do not follow unwholesome karma; * 修戒 (cultivating precepts): establishing and purifying the norms of conduct and speech, ceasing evil deeds and establishing wholesome dharmas; * 修心 (cultivating the mind): nurturing concentration (samādhi) and the mind's self-mastery; * 修慧 (cultivating wisdom): clearly seeing dependent origination, impermanence, and non-self as they truly are.

The *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* (《大般涅槃经》) compares precepts to a "梯橙" (a ladder rung/step). Cultivating precepts is the first step in ascending to heights—the root of all wholesome dharmas (as the earth gives birth to all things), the guide of all good roots (as a caravan leader guides the merchants), and the armor that crushes the bandits of afflictions and bonds. In the famous "阿能訶鼓" (A-neng-he drum) parable, an ancient drum whose interior had rotted away, covered only by oxhide, eventually became a mere "pile of wood" and fell silent. The Buddha used this to warn: if one does not diligently cultivate body, precepts, mind, and wisdom, the practitioner cannot bear the "profound clear illumination of emptiness that follows dependent origination," and will only drift into worldly ornamentation of words, causing the true Dharma to perish.

2. The Karmic Mechanism: Diluting Evil Karma and "Heavy Offenses Lightly Received"

Cultivating precepts has a decisive influence on how a practitioner experiences the ripening of retribution. This is not because some divine power exempts one from karmic retribution, but because the practitioner of precepts, through accumulating vast wholesome merit, transforms the "consciousness-environment" in which evil karma operates.

* The non-practitioner of precepts (the metaphor of salt in a small amount of water): One who does not cultivate body, precepts, mind, and wisdom lacks the water of merit. When an ounce of salt is cast into a bowl of scant water, the water becomes too salty and bitter to drink. Even a minor evil karma (like a poor man owing a single coin, or a weak man whose sheep is forcibly seized) will, without resistance, summon the extremely heavy suffering of the hells. * The practitioner of precepts (the metaphor of salt in the Ganges): One who diligently cultivates body, precepts, mind, and wisdom has merit like the waters of the Ganges. The same ounce of salt cast into the Ganges—the water is abundant and does not turn salty. Past evil karma is diluted by vast wholesome merit; what would have been a heavy offense leading to hell is transformed into a light retribution experienced in the present life (現法輕報)—that is, "heavy offenses lightly received."

3. The Psychological Mechanism: Eradicating Unwholesome Dharmas and "Untying the Tangled Hair"

The *Saṃyuktāgama* (《杂阿含经》) describes the direct efficacy of cultivating precepts as "於纏能解纏" ("able to untangle bonds from within bonds") and "解縈髻" ("untying the tangled, knotted hair").

The core of cultivating precepts lies in purifying the inner mind. By upholding pure precepts, one directly blocks and eradicates latent unwholesome dharmas in the mind, such as "恚恨" (resentment), "瞋纏" (the bond of hatred), "不語結" (the knot of silent sulking—holding onto grudges through silence), "慳" (stinginess), "嫉" (envy), "欺誑" (deception), "諛諂" (flattery and sycophancy), "無慙" (shamelessness), and "無愧" (lack of remorse). Precepts are not an external shackle but the antidote that unties the mind's knots of affliction.

4. Progressive Stages: Śrāvaka Precepts and the Mahāyāna Bodhisattva's Signless Precepts

As cultivation deepens, the scriptures divide the upholding of precepts into levels:

* Inferior precepts and peripheral precepts (下戒與邊戒): If one upholds precepts only for self-benefit, seeking heavenly or human rewards (enjoying the pleasures of the five desires), or out of fear of the three evil destinies, fear of the king's law, or fear of a bad reputation—this, in the deeper sense of the doctrine, "is not called true cultivation of precepts." * Śrāvaka precepts and Bodhisattva precepts: Śrāvaka precepts emphasize self-discipline and self-liberation; but the truly "cultivated precepts" (bodhisattva precepts / śīla-pāramitā) must be upheld "for the sake of liberating all sentient beings and for protecting the true Dharma." * Signless upholding of precepts (無相持戒): In the ultimate truth (paramārtha-satya), Mahāyāna scriptures require thoroughly breaking through the "attachment to dharmas" regarding precepts. True cultivation of precepts must reach the signless state of "not seeing precepts, not seeing the marks of precepts, not seeing the one who upholds them, not seeing retribution, and not observing transgression." If one gives rise to the clinging thought, "I have precepts to uphold; others break them; upholding precepts brings merit," one remains bound by "attachment to precepts" (戒取, śīlavrata-parāmarśa) and has not reached true cultivation.


A Walkthrough in Everyday Life

To avoid abstracting "修戒," we can restore this classical concept to the daily scenarios of modern people (commuting, scrolling on phones, office work, intimate relationships) and see how body, precepts, mind, and wisdom operate in coordination—and where people are most prone to misunderstanding.

Scenario One: Late-Night Phone Scrolling and the Algorithm Trap

* The state of not cultivating precepts (salt in scant water): Before sleep, the algorithm pushes an emotionally charged, controversial news item. Resentment and arrogance rise in your heart, and you casually type a sharp, sarcastic comment attacking another user (creating evil karma). Lacking daily physical and mental protection, with no buffer of wholesome dharmas in the mind (scant water), you wake up the next day anxious and distracted, sinking the entire day into meaningless online quarrels and mental exhaustion (a minor evil summoning great suffering). * The walkthrough of cultivating precepts (salt in the Ganges and untying the tangled hair): 1. 修身 (sense protection): Set a physical habit of not bringing the phone into the bedroom before sleep, cutting off the external conditions for evil causes; 2. 修戒 (ceasing evil and promoting good): Abide by the precepts of "no false speech, no harsh speech." When you notice the impulse to mock others arising in the mind ("增伺" and "欺誑"), immediately cease it—do not press the keys; 3. 修心 and 修慧: See clearly that the emotions triggered by the algorithm are merely impermanent physiological reactions; do not cling to them. Even if envy or hatred occasionally arises in the mind (the salt), because of the concentration, wisdom, and merit accumulated through daily practice (the Ganges water), the emotion is quickly diluted and dissipated, leaving no residual poison of affliction (untying the tangled hair).

Scenario Two: Overtime at Work and Communication Conflicts

* Common misapplication: Many people think "upholding precepts" means rigidly compromising oneself, passively enduring abuse, or using precepts as a moral whip to police colleagues ("He speaks so harshly—he's really not upholding precepts"). * The walkthrough of true cultivation of precepts: Facing a colleague's shirking or a superior's scolding, the mind gives rise to "不語結" (silent sulking and cold violence) or "諛諂" (insincere flattery). * True cultivation: Notice that these unwholesome dharmas are sprouting. Guard your speech karma according to the precepts: neither speak against your conscience in flattery nor give rise to cold-hearted revenge. Cultivate wisdom within, understanding that the other person's emotions are also the result of the aggregation of various pressures and conditions. * The signless state: Uphold professional ethics and goodwill, but "not see the one who upholds, not see retribution"—do not feel you are a noble "suffering precept-holder," nor wait for the other's gratitude. Upholding precepts for the sake of protecting the purity and goodwill of the work environment—this is the true embodiment of "protecting the true Dharma."


Why Contemporary People Need It

In modern life, with information explosion and relentless pace, people often face the predicaments of mental scattering, emotional dysregulation, and spiritual emptiness. At such a time, cultivating precepts offers a "body-mind defense system" of immense contemporary value:

1. Building a Mental "Firewall" and a Mechanism for Silence

Contemporary psychology and neuroscience research has found that the human brain is highly susceptible to manipulation by external stimuli (such as social media and instant feedback). Frequent impulsive behavior deepens the brain's old neural circuits (what Buddhism calls "affliction bonds").

At the psychological level, cultivating precepts functions as a clearly coded protective net. By creating a buffer zone in behavior and speech (ceasing evil), it severs the neural pathway from unwholesome thought to unwholesome action, calming an overactive amygdala, and providing the necessary physiological and psychological space for "修心" (concentration) and "修慧" (cognitive restructuring).

2. Providing a Solid Anchor Against "Nihilism and Anxiety"

Freedom without precepts often leads to endless desire-inflation and the consequent sense of emptiness. Modern people frequently fall into the vicious cycle of "mistake—guilt—self-criticism—mistake again."

The progressive logic of cultivating precepts is: upholding precepts → no remorse in the mind → experiencing joy → attaining meditative concentration → true knowledge and vision → seeing the perils of birth and death → liberation.

Correctly upheld precepts do not bring repression but the pure clarity of "no regret." When the mind owes nothing, stability and joy naturally arise—this is the source of deep psychological calm and focus.

3. From Self-Centeredness to Signless Altruism

Contemporary culture heavily emphasizes "self-actualization," but this can easily trap people in narrow egoism. If one upholds precepts only so that "I" can get good rewards, or "I" can go to heaven, this is still "peripheral precepts" and "inferior precepts." Cultivating precepts requires opening the heart's capacity—"for the sake of liberating all sentient beings and protecting the true Dharma"—and gradually letting go of attachment to the self-image of "the precept-holder" (signless upholding of precepts). This vision that transcends self-clinging is precisely the most effective antidote to modern anxiety and isolation.


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

Misunderstanding One: Upholding Precepts Is Rigid Dogmatism That Robs People of Freedom and Creativity

* Clarification: The scriptures clearly state that if one merely clings to the formal details of precepts, and even develops pride and exclusivity from this (i.e., "戒取" and "法執"), the *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* directly judges this as "not cultivating precepts." The root meaning of true śīla is "coolness" and "following wholesome dharmas." Precepts are like guardrails on a road—their purpose is not to restrict the vehicle but to prevent it from falling off a cliff. With guardrails, the driver can move freely within safe boundaries. Precepts untie the body-mind's "tangled hair" (bonds), bringing genuine inner freedom.

Misunderstanding Two: "As Long as My Heart Is Kind, 'A Pure Mind Is Upholding Precepts'—I Don't Need Formal Cultivation"

* Clarification: This view overlooks the complexity of body-mind interaction. In the "阿能訶鼓" parable of the *Saṃyuktāgama*, a drum whose interior has rotted is meaningless despite its exterior; but if one completely abandons the practice of precepts, the inner dharma-body and wisdom-life have nothing to rely upon. "修身、修戒、修心、修慧" is an indivisible whole. Without the concrete norms and protections of conduct (body) and speech (precepts), the mind's unwholesome dharmas (such as 欺誑, 諛諂, and 恚恨) will flow along with circumstances unconsciously. "A pure mind" is by no means an empty declaration—it must be actualized in the awareness and purification of subtle behaviors.

Misunderstanding Three: Committing an Error Means Going Straight to Hell—Precepts Keep People in Constant Fear

* Clarification: This fear stems from a narrow understanding of the karmic mechanism. The "salt in the Ganges" metaphor in the scriptures clearly shows: karma is not a rigid, unchanging punishment but a dynamic manifestation of the mind's merit. Fear-based upholding of precepts (holding precepts out of dread of the three evil destinies or the king's law) is called by the scriptures "not cultivating precepts." The true cultivator does not wallow in past guilt but, through broadly cultivating body, precepts, mind, and wisdom, accumulates immeasurable wholesome merit, diluting past evil karma (heavy offenses lightly received), and ultimately, through the signless wisdom of "not seeing the holder, not seeing transgression," completely transcends the relative concepts of guilt and punishment, and awakens to the unborn, undying nature of awareness.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

修戒(śīla-bhāvanā)是指对戒律的修习、持守与净化。在佛教经典中,修戒不仅是防非止恶的道德规范,更是解脱身心缠缚、承载如来甚深法藏(如空相与缘起法),乃至最终体见佛性的根本基石。它通常与修身、修心、修慧并列,共同构成系统性的修行框架。

二、 主要阐述

1. 修戒对业报受报方式的决定性影响(重罪轻受) 根据经典论述,是否修戒直接决定了修行者在造作不善业后的受报结果。未修戒者(即不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧)若造作恶业,必受地狱之苦。经典中通过“盐投少水”(水即咸苦不可饮)、“强夺弱羊”(弱者无力反抗)、“贫人负债”(因微债而被捆绑)等比喻,说明未修戒者缺乏善法功德,微小的恶业也会带来极大的地狱苦报。相反,修戒者若造作恶业,则能“重罪轻受”,仅受现法轻报。其对应的比喻为“盐投恒水”(水多而不咸)、“弱窃强羊”(有权势者能依靠威力夺回)、“富人负债”(富人不因债务被捆绑),说明修戒者功德广大,恶业被稀释而不显。若不修戒,则会导致“于小恶业,得大恶报”,使现受轻报转为地狱重报。

2. 修戒与灭除内心恶法的关系 修戒是灭除内心诸如“增伺”、“诤讼”、“恚恨”、“瞋缠”、“不語結”、“慳”、“嫉”、“欺誑”、“諛諂”、“無慙”、“無愧”、“惡欲”、“惡見”等恶法与烦恼的关键途径。通过如实修戒,能使心不生起这些恶法,达到彻底灭除的效果。

3. 真修与非修的界限 大乘经典对修戒提出了更高的无相要求。若持戒是为了自利、人天受乐、利养,或因畏惧三恶道、王法、恶名等,皆不名“修习戒”。同样,仅为自利自调、生天受五欲乐而受持“下戒”或“边戒”,亦不名修戒。真正的修戒必须是“为度脱一切众生、为护正法”而受持,且在修持时达到“不见戒、不见戒相、不见持者、不见果报、不观毁犯”的无相境界。若对戒产生法执(如见戒、戒相、戒因、戒果等),亦属于“不修戒”。

4. 修戒的分类与因缘 持戒之人可分为“性自能持”(历经无量世不漏失,遇恶世恶法仍修持如本)与“须他教敕”(依凭和上、善友等教诲)两类。戒本身又分为“声闻戒”(观白骨至阿罗汉果,不能见佛性)与“菩萨戒”(从初发心至成菩提,能见佛性、如来、涅槃)。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

对于“修戒”及相关修行的表述,不同部类及译本呈现出鲜明的术语特征: * 在《中阿含经》(东晋瞿昙僧伽提婆译)中,“修戒”常与“修身、修心、修慧”并列,其对立面表述为“不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧”。在描述内心烦恼时,使用了“增伺”、“不語結”、“無慙”、“欺誑”等特定译词。 * 在《杂阿含经》(刘宋求那跋陀罗译)中,修持戒律被表述为“建立戒”、“受持於淨戒”以及“修戒”。其修行的直接效果被独特地形容为“於纏能解纏”与“解縈髻”。 * 在《大般涅槃经》(北凉昙无谶译)中,引入了大乘菩萨道的视角,使用了“尸波罗蜜”、“边戒”、“下戒”等特定术语。此外,该经将戒律形象地比喻为“梯橙”(即梯磴)。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与“修身、修心、修慧”的关系 修戒与修身、修心、修慧共同构成完整的修行体系。在《杂阿含经》中,通过“阿能訶鼓”的寓言说明,若不修此四法,修行者便无法领受如来甚深空相与缘起法,导致正法消灭;若能勤修四法,则能对甚深法产生“顿受、周备受”的体证。 2. 与“智慧、正觉”的关系 修戒并非孤立。智者在建立戒律的同时,必须“内心修智慧”或“内心修正觉”,如此方能解开身心烦恼。 3. 与“见佛性”的关系 持戒的最终指向是见佛性。其递进逻辑为:持戒使“心不悔”,进而得受乐、远离、安隐、禅定、实知见,从而见生死过患、心不贪著、得解脱、得无上大涅槃、得常乐我净法、得不生不灭,最终“见佛性”。

五、 代表性原文引用

* 《中阿含经》:“若有不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧,寿命甚短。彼若作不善业,必受苦果地狱之报。” * 《杂阿含经》:“智者建立戒,内心修智慧,專精勤方便,於纏能解纏。” * 《大般涅槃经》:“为度脱一切众生、为护正法,是名真修习戒。” * 《大般涅槃经》:“持戒是一切善法梯橙,是一切善法之根本。”

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「修戒」,始終將它置於「修身、修戒、修心、修慧」這一固定四法框架之中,未見以「戒學」「持戒」「戒行」等他詞替代「修戒」的用法。四修並舉是本經論述戒的核心術語形式,修戒從不孤立出現,必與修身、修心、修慧同列。

本經論修戒最突出的面向,是將它納入業報輕重的機制中加以說明。佛以「隨人所作業則受其報」為前提,指出同作不善業,果報卻有天壤之別:不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧而壽命甚短者,必受苦果地獄之報;修身、修戒、修心、修慧而壽命極長者,則必受苦果現法之報,且「彼於現法設受善惡業報而輕微也」。修戒在此並非單獨決定果報,而是作為四修之一,共同構成使重業轉輕的修行基礎。

經中連用三組譬喻反覆申明此理。其一為鹽水喻:一兩鹽投少水中則鹹不可飲,投恒水中則不能令鹹——不修戒者如少水,微惡即成地獄重報;修戒者如恒水,惡業不能令其苦不堪言。其二為奪羊喻:王臣有勢奪貧者之羊,貧者只能叉手求索;反之竊羊者貧賤無勢,有力之羊主即收縛竊者還奪其羊——修戒者如有力之主,惡業雖至而不能深害。其三為負債喻:貧者負五錢乃至一錢即為主所縛,富者產業無量雖負百錢乃至千萬亦不為主所縛——修戒者如富者,業債不能令其淪墮。三喻歸於同一結論:修戒與餘三修共同作用,令不善業報轉為現法輕受。

另一經則從滅除煩惱的角度論及修戒。佛說或有法從身滅、從口滅,或不從身口滅但以慧見滅。增伺、諍訟、恚恨、瞋纏、不語結、慳、嫉、欺誑、諛諂、無慙、無愧、惡欲、惡見等煩惱,不從身口滅,但以慧見滅。然而如來觀他人心時,仍以「修身、修戒、修心、修慧」為整體判準:不如是修者,心生惡增伺、惡欲、惡見而住,不得滅除;如是修者,心不生惡增伺,得滅惡欲、惡見。此處修戒的定位值得注意:意業煩惱雖最終依慧見而滅,但修戒仍是如來觀察此人能否滅惑的整體修行條件之一,與修身、修心、修慧缺一不可。

綜上,《中阿含經》論修戒有兩個獨特側面:一是業報轉化——修戒令重業輕受、不墮地獄;二是滅惑基礎——修戒為如來觀察行者能否滅除意業惡法的整體條件。術語上,本經一律使用「修戒」,與修身、修心、修慧構成固定四法組合,未見其他戒類異名。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本經以「阿能訶鼓」之譬喻,論述修戒與修身、修心、修慧四者並修之必要性,並將其置於能否領受如來甚深法的因果脈絡中。

一、術語形式:本經所用為「修戒」,與修身、修心、修慧並列為四項,原文作「修身、修戒、修心、修慧」。此四修之排列為身、戒、心、慧,戒居第二,為由外而內、由粗而細之次第。本經未使用「戒行」「持戒」「淨戒」等他詞,亦未對戒之內容(如波羅提木叉、四清淨等)作進一步展開,僅以「修戒」一詞統攝。

二、核心論述:本經並非孤立地談修戒,而是將修戒作為領受甚深法之前提條件。經云:「修身、修戒、修心、修慧,以彼修身、修戒、修心、修慧故,於如來所說修多羅甚深明照,難見難覺,不可思量,微密決定,明智所知,彼則頓受、周備受」。意謂唯有四修具足,方能對如來所說甚深明照之法「頓受、周備受」,聞之而「歡喜崇習,出離饒益」。修戒在此並非目的本身,而是使行者成為堪受深法之器。

三、反面論證:經以「當來比丘不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧」為對照,指出不修戒者聞如來所說「甚深明照空相應隨順緣起法」時,「不頓受持,不至到受」,轉而於「世間眾雜異論、文辭綺飾、世俗雜句,專心頂受」,終「不得出離饒益」。此處顯示修戒之缺失並非僅為行為層面之過失,更直接導致智慧領受力之喪失——不修戒則心不向深法,反趨淺俗。

四、譬喻結構:經以陀舍羅訶之阿能訶鼓為喻。鼓初時「好聲、美聲、深聲,徹四十里」,久則裂壞,雖以牛皮纏縛,終無復高聲,最後「皮大剝落,唯有聚木」。此鼓之朽壞喻正法於不修四修之當來比丘手中漸次滅失:「於彼如來所說甚深明照空相要法隨順緣起者,於此則滅,猶如彼鼓,朽故壞裂,唯有聚木」。修戒在此譬喻中,是維持鼓身完整、不令朽裂的纏縛之力;不修戒則如鼓之漸壞,終至無聲。

五、獨特側面:本經論修戒之獨特處,在於將戒與「甚深明照空相應隨順緣起法」之領受能力直接掛鉤。修戒不是孤立的道德規範,而是使行者能「頓受、遍受」空相應緣起法的內在條件。此為本經有別於單純列舉戒相、戒條之經文的論述角度。

六、結勸:經末世尊結云:「當勤方便修身、修戒、修心、修慧,於如來所說甚深明照空相要法隨順緣起,頓受、遍受。聞彼說者,歡喜崇習,出離饒益」。以「勤方便」修戒,目的歸於受持深法、得饒益,而非僅止於戒行清淨本身。

大般涅槃經(北本)T0374 · 涅槃部

《大般涅槃經(北本)》以「修身、修戒、修心、修慧」四法並舉為框架,將「修戒」置於戒定慧三學之上更增「修身」一層,構成該經獨特的修行論述結構。經中對「修戒」的正面界定,採密集譬喻群鋪陳:戒是「一切善法梯橙」(梯橙即階梯),亦是一切善法根本,「如地悉是一切樹木所生之本」;戒是諸善根之導首,「如彼商主導眾商人」;戒是一切善法勝幢,「如天帝釋所立勝幢」;戒能永斷一切惡業及三惡道,能療惡病猶如藥樹;戒是生死險道資糧,是摧結破賊鎧仗,是滅結毒蛇良呪,是度惡業行橋梁。經文明言:「若有不能如是觀者,名不修戒。」 此處術語值得注意:「梯橙」一詞以「橙」訓階梯,為該經特有之譯語;「鎧仗」「良呪」等軍事與呪術意象亦屬本經修辭特色。

然而本經論修戒並非止於正面肯定。在「第一義」層面,經文進一步否定對戒的執取:「若見戒、戒相、戒因、戒果、上戒、下戒、戒聚、戒一、戒二、此戒、彼戒、戒滅、戒等、戒修、修者、戒波羅蜜,若有如是見者,名不修戒。」 此處將「戒波羅蜜」亦列入所應超越之見,顯示本經以般若空觀貫穿戒學:執戒相、戒因、戒果乃至戒波羅蜜為實有,即落入「不修戒」。正面觀戒之功德與第一義中不執戒相,二者並存而不相廢,構成該經修戒論的雙重結構。

經文又論不修戒之果報:不修身戒心慧之人,「於小惡業,得大惡報」,心無悔恨,覆藏瑕疵,過去善業悉為罪垢所污,「現受輕報,轉為地獄極重惡果」。經以小器水置鹽一升則鹹苦難飲、負人一錢不能償則身被繫縛多受眾苦為喻。 佛更說五事令現輕報轉地獄受,其中「無戒財」「不修身戒心慧」直接關涉修戒,顯示本經以「戒財」稱戒之資用功能,亦為該經特有術語。

綜觀本經修戒論述,其獨特處有三:一、以四法(身戒心慧)而非三學立框架;二、正面以八重譬喻極讚戒之功用,反面於第一義中連「戒波羅蜜」亦須超越;三、以「戒財」概念將戒納入因果報應之資糧邏輯,不修戒則小罪成大禍。

Related