Dharma · AI Companion

現報

dṛṣṭadharmavedanīya

今生造业而于今生受报AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

三时业于第一重业报论教授,般若读为业报亦性空(第二重)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

現報, often rendered as "present-life retribution" or "the retribution experienced in this very dharma (*dṛṣṭadharma-*)", is one of the most practically testable ideas in Buddhist ethics. The Sanskrit root *dṛṣṭa-* means "seen, present, this-worldly"; *vedanīya* means "to be experienced, to be felt." The compound therefore names the *quality* of being something felt right now, in this body, in this life — not deferred, not postponed to a future birth.

In the standard three-fold classification of karmic timing (三時報), 現報 sits beside two companions:

- 現報 (dṛṣṭadharma-vedanīya) — fruit experienced in this very life - 生報 (upapadya-vedanīya) — fruit experienced in the next life - 後報 (apāya-vedanīya) — fruit experienced two or more lives later

What makes the *Madhyama Āgama* (《中阿含經》, T0026) distinctive is that it does *not* develop the doctrine along this three-fold axis at all. Instead, it sets up a sharp two-pole contrast: 現法之報 (the retribution of the present dharma) versus 地獄之報 (hell-retribution). Same action, two radically different outcomes. The teaching is not "when does karma ripen?" but rather "what kind of person are you when it ripens?"

The Governing Principle

The sutra opens with a sentence that anchors everything else: 「隨人所作業則受其報」 — "according to what each person has done, so they receive its fruit." Action and consequence are not negotiable; they are bound together. What is variable is not *whether* the fruit ripens, but *how* and *where*.

The Salt-and-Water Metaphor

This is the conceptual heart of the passage, and it deserves to be unfolded slowly because the popular imagination almost always gets it wrong.

The sutra asks us to imagine the same act — "one *liang* (兩) of salt" — being dropped into two different bodies of water.

**Scenario one: One *liang* of salt dropped into a small amount of water. The water turns unbearably salty. You cannot drink it. This is the image of someone who is 不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧 — who does not cultivate the body, the precepts, the mind, or wisdom — and whose 壽命甚短 (lifespan is short). When such a person commits an unwholesome act, the unwholesome karma is concentrated, unbuffered, and overwhelming. It must ripen, and because there is no cushion of inner cultivation to absorb or dilute its force, it tears downward. The fruit is 苦果地獄之報** — the bitter fruit of hell-retribution.

**Scenario two: The same one *liang* of salt dropped into a great river (恒水, the river of *Gaṅgā*). The salt dissolves, but the river is not noticeably altered. The water remains drinkable. This is the image of someone who 修身、修戒、修心、修慧 — who cultivates body, precepts, mind, and wisdom — and whose 壽命極長** (lifespan is long). When such a person commits an unwholesome act, the karma *still ripens* — the salt still exists — but the vast body of inner cultivation disperses its force so that the experienced consequence is 輕微, slight. The fruit is 現法之報 — tasted now, in this life, but gentle.

Notice three things carefully, because this is where most modern readings go astray:

1. The salt is the same in both cases. Cultivation does not erase karma. The action still has its fruit. 2. The water is the same amount of salt dissolving into different volumes. The factor that changes the outcome is the *volume of inner life* the person has built up. 3. Both poles still experience a consequence. The cultivated person is not exempted; they simply experience "苦果之報" — the *bitter* fruit-retribution — but mildly. The closing line of the passage makes this explicit: 「彼於現法設受善惡業報而輕微也」 — "even in the present dharma, they receive the fruit of good and evil karma, but it is slight."

The Four Cultivations (四修)

The sutra names four dimensions of inner development, and each is doing a specific kind of work:

- 修身 — cultivating the body: ethical conduct expressed in physical action, restraint of harmful deeds, care for one's bodily actions and their consequences. - 修戒 — cultivating the precepts: holding to moral principles as a stable framework of life. - 修心 — cultivating the mind: training the inner life — attention, emotional regulation, the softening of greed, hatred, delusion. - 修慧 — cultivating wisdom: seeing clearly into how things actually work, including how karma ripens.

These four together are what create "the great volume of water." None of them is a magical shield; all of them are inner capacities developed over time.

The Lifespan Factor

The sutra adds something easily overlooked: *壽命甚短* versus *壽命極長*. Why does this matter? Because in the classical Buddhist framework, the ripening of karma requires a *basis* (a body, a continuum of experience) to land in. A short life gives less temporal and physical space for the karma to distribute itself across many small experiences. A long life provides more occasions — more breaths, more encounters, more circumstances — through which the same karmic force can be "spent." The lifespan thus becomes part of the natural buffer alongside the four cultivations.

The Sheep and the Debt: Reinforcement Metaphors

The passage then reinforces the point with two more homely images:

- The sheep-stealing image: A poor, powerless person steals a sheep from someone powerful; they are caught and bound on the spot. A rich, powerful person steals a sheep from someone even weaker; no one dares to restrain them, at least not immediately. The point is not that the powerful person "gets away with it" in a moral vacuum; the point is that the *immediate, visible consequence* differs vastly based on one's worldly position and inner cultivation. In karmic terms, those without inner cultivation face the full, binding force of the act; those with cultivation do not.

- The debt image: A penniless debtor cannot escape the creditor's claim. A wealthy person who owes a hundred or a thousand gold pieces has resources, leverage, social standing; the creditor cannot simply seize them. Again, the karma is not erased; the capacity to absorb and negotiate its ripening is different.

These metaphors are doing important work: they tell us that 現報 is not a doctrine of exemption but of modulation. The salted river is not unsalty; it is not noticeably salty. The wealthy debtor is not debt-free; they are not bound on the spot.

Where T0026 Sits in the Larger System

It is worth pausing on the unusual framing of this sutra. Most presentations of Buddhist karma in the Āgamas develop the three-time classification — when does the fruit appear? — and the four-fold classification — heavy, habitual, near-death, or accumulated karma. This passage instead uses a two-pole contrast: *now, mildly* versus *after death, severely*. Theologically, this matters because it shifts the question from "when will I pay?" to "what kind of inner life am I building?" The cultivation of body, precepts, mind, and wisdom is reframed not as a path to exemption but as a path that *softens the ripening* of one's actions in real, felt experience.

Life Inquiry: Walking Through This in Today's World

Let us take a single, ordinary kind of unwholesome action — say, breaking a promise to someone who depends on you — and watch what the classical analysis says about how it lands.

Person A: Has not cultivated. Someone who has not cared for their body (burning themselves out, neglecting rest, treating the body as an instrument of pure extraction), has not held to clear precepts (no stable "I do this and don't do that"), has not trained their mind (impulse-driven, easily hijacked by irritation or desire), and has not developed wisdom (no capacity to see the long arc of their own patterns). Their life is also relatively short in the relevant sense — meaning, the body of inner experience they have built is thin.

When this person breaks a promise, the karma lands *concentrated*. They feel it as a heavy, grinding shame. Their relationships sour quickly. They lose the trust of the very people they need. The "salt in little water" is everywhere: every small consequence is unbearably intense. In the long arc, if the pattern is severe enough and unbroken, the inner life is so thin that the ripening must extend beyond this life.

Person B: Has cultivated. Someone who has cared for their body (knowing its limits, honoring rest, treating it as something to be respected), who holds to precepts (clear inner lines: "I keep my word, especially to those who depend on me"), who has trained their mind (can sit with discomfort without immediately acting out), and who has developed some wisdom (can see, even dimly, that a promise broken is a thread cut). Their inner life has volume.

When this person breaks a promise — and the sutra is explicit that cultivation does not prevent the action, only its consequences — they still feel it. The "salt" is still there. But it manifests as a quiet, slight sting of conscience, perhaps a brief loss of face, a moment of awkward repair — *輕微*, mild. They may even find that the very capacities of mind and wisdom they have developed make it almost impossible to break the promise in the first place. But if they do, the ripening is gentle. The river is still drinkable.

Mapping to Specific Contemporary Scenes

In a workplace: Two people, the same sharp email sent in anger. The first person has no inner cultivation — they have no practice of restraint, no ethics framework, no inner pause. The email lands: a firing, a lawsuit, a destroyed reputation. The salt dominates the water. The second person has been cultivating — perhaps a meditation practice, a clear ethics of speech, a habit of pausing before sending. The same angry impulse arises; perhaps the email goes out, perhaps not; if it does, they feel a sting, repair quickly, learn, and continue. The salt is in the river.

In a marriage: Two people, the same infidelity. The first has no inner life of cultivation — no held vows treated as sacred, no inner mirror, no wisdom about pattern. The action tears the marriage apart with catastrophic force. The second has built a life of cultivation — has tended vows, has a developed inner witness, has a real ethics of relationship. The action may not even occur; but if it does, the consequence is a localized sting, a reckoning that can be faced, a relationship that survives or ends cleanly. The salt is in the river; the river is still a river.

In the ordinary day: The classic mistake contemporary people make is to map 現報 onto the small daily annoyances of life — "I was mean to my coworker and then my train was delayed, karma!" The classical framework is doing something much more patient and structural than this. 現報 concerns the long-arc ripening of one's actions across the whole texture of a life, modulated by the *kind of person one has become*.

The Mapping Error Worth Naming

The most common mapping error in modern readings is to read the salt-and-water metaphor *backwards*. People say: "Cultivation means I don't feel the karma — I'm protected." This is the opposite of what the sutra says. The salt *still exists*. The action *still ripens*. The fruit is still experienced. It is just *mild*. The metaphor is not about immunity; it is about modulation.

The second common error is to read 現報 as a doctrine of "instant karma" — that every act gets a fast, visible consequence. The classical picture is far more patient. 現報 can refer to consequences that ripen *over the course of this life*, in the unfolding of character, relationships, health, opportunities, and inner experience. The "now" of dṛṣṭa- is not "in five minutes." It is "within the span of this body and this human existence."

The third common error is to read the four cultivations as religious or ritual acts — special practices done at a meditation cushion. 修身 is about how you treat your body across the whole day. 修戒 is about whether you actually hold to your stated principles under pressure. 修心 is whether you can pause. 修慧 is whether you can see. These are capacities built through ordinary life, not escape routes from it.

Why Contemporary People Need This Teaching

The contemporary moral imagination is shaped by two poles, both of which the 現報 teaching quietly subverts.

Pole one: "What goes around comes around" — instant cosmic justice. Popular spirituality often teaches that bad acts produce fast, visible consequences. When they don't, the conclusion is that the universe is unjust or that the teaching is false. The classical teaching says: consequences are real, but their ripening is *modulated* by who you have become. A person of cultivation may not get instant comeuppance — not because there is no justice, but because the salt is in the river.

Pole two: "There are no consequences" — materialist secularism. The other dominant assumption is that actions have no intrinsic moral ripeness; only social and biological feedback shapes outcomes. The classical teaching insists that there *is* a felt ripeness to one's actions, and it shows up precisely in the texture of one's life — in one's capacity for shame, repair, relationship, sleep, presence, joy. Whether one frames this in religious or secular terms, the practical observation holds: people who have built inner life tend to experience the consequences of their lapses as mild, recoverable, learning moments; people without that inner life experience every lapse as catastrophe.

The teaching's gift to contemporary readers is a third way between magical instant-karma and moral nihilism. It says: the volume of your inner life is itself a kind of ethical substance. Every hour of genuine practice — of attending to your body, holding your precepts, training your mind, opening to wisdom — adds to the volume of the river. This is not metaphysical speculation; it is observable in how people actually weather their own mistakes.

It also reframes ethics away from fear. The classical teaching is *not* primarily "be good or you will burn in hell." It is: "if you have built no inner life, your mistakes will burn you; if you have built inner life, your mistakes will still sting, but gently — and you will learn." The motivation is not terror but maturation.

This is, in a quiet way, an extraordinarily hopeful teaching. It says that no one is locked into the worst possible ripening of every action. The inner life is built slowly, and it works slowly, and it makes the consequences of being human more *livable*. The salt does not vanish. The water does.

Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading 1: "Cultivation means no consequences." As we have walked through, this inverts the metaphor. The salt is real. The fruit is real. It is just experienced *輕微* — slightly. The teaching is about modulation, not exemption. Anyone who uses 現報 as a license for complacency has misunderstood it.

Misreading 2: "現報 is the same as 'instant karma.'" The "now" of dṛṣṭa- is not "in the next moment." It refers to consequences ripening within this very life's span. Many such consequences — the deepening or souring of character, the texture of one's relationships, the gradual erosion or strengthening of conscience — unfold over years. The teaching is patient, not dramatic.

Misreading 3: "The four cultivations are religious practices." 修身, 修戒, 修心, 修慧 are not rituals. They are capacities developed across a whole human life. A person with no Buddhist practice at all but with a lifetime of bodily care, ethical consistency, emotional maturity, and clear seeing has been building the same volume of water.

Misreading 4: "現報 only applies to moral failing." The closing line of the passage — 「彼於現法設受善惡業報而輕微也」 — explicitly includes *both* good and evil karma. The cultivation that buffers the ripening of unwholesome actions also shapes the ripening of wholesome ones. This is a teaching about how *all* karmic fruit is experienced, not a doctrine only of punishment.

Misreading 5: "This is just fatalism or determinism." The opposite. The whole point is that *who you are becoming* determines how your actions will land. You are not fixed; you are building, moment by moment, the volume of the river. The teaching is an encouragement to cultivation, not a description of an already-written fate.

A final observation on framing: The classical text is precise in its language. It does not say 現報 but 現法之報 — "the retribution of the present dharma." The word *dharma* here carries weight: it is not merely "the present life" but "the present teaching, the present reality, the present truth." The retribution is felt *within the dharma one is living in* — within the actual fabric of one's present understanding, conduct, and capacity. That is the field where 修身、修戒、修心、修慧 do their quiet work, and that is the field where the salt of one's actions dissolves — or fails to dissolve — into something drinkable, or into something unbearably salt.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

現報,梵文 dṛṣṭadharma-vedanīya,又译「現法之報」,为佛教业报理论中之重要概念,指由身口意三业所造之业因,于现在之世间即领受其果报,而不必待至来世方受其果。在传统三时报之分类中,现报与「生報」(upapadya-vedanīya,指来生方受之报)、「后報」(apāya-vedanīya,指二生以后乃至多生方受之报)合称三时报,为业感缘起之重要环节。然诸经对现报之具体内涵与判定因缘之表述各有不同。

2. 主要阐述

《中阿含經》(阿含部·《中阿含經》)以「現法之報」一语表述此概念,并将之与「地獄之報」对立而立,构成本经论述「現報」之独特框架。

经中开宗明义云:「隨人所作業則受其報」,明作业受报之总原则,即造何等业即受何等报。然经中更进一层揭示:同一不善业,因造业者根性不同,所感之报亦异。经中具体分两种情形以明之:

其一,感地獄之報者:谓有人不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧,寿命甚短,其作不善业,必受苦果地獄之报。经以「一兩盐投少水中」为喻——盐多水少,水即鹹不可饮。

其二,感現法之報者:谓有人修身、修戒、修心、修慧,寿命极长,其作不善业,则于现法之中即受苦果之报。经以「一兩盐投恒水中」为喻——恒水甚多,一兩盐少,不能令水鹹。

上述二喻表明:造业者本身修行之深浅与寿命之长短,决定其不善业感果之轻重与受报之时序。修行深厚、寿命长者,犹如恒河之水浩瀚,一两盐投入其中不能令其味变,故其不善业虽于现法受报,然极为轻微;反之,不修四修、寿命短者,犹如少量之水,一两盐投入即令其鹹不可饮,故其不善业必于死后感地狱之重报。

经中又以「夺羊」、「负债」等世间之事为喻,反复申说此理。贫贱无力者窃取有权势者之羊,必为所缚,犹如不善业感地狱报;有势有力者虽负百千万钱,亦不为债主所拘,犹如修身修戒者虽作不善业,其报轻微。

经文最后总结云:「彼於現法設受善惡業報而輕微也」,强调此类造业者虽于今生即受果报,然极为轻微,不堕地狱。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

就《中阿含經》本身而论,其用语有以下数端值得注意:

第一,本经使用「現法之報」一词,而不以单字「現報」立名,体现出本经特有之表述习惯。

第二,本经以「苦果」二字修饰报体,作「苦果地獄之報」与「苦果之报」之语,与泛泛所谓「报」之概念相区别,显示其对报体性质之特别关注。

第三,本经之独特论法在于:以「修身、修戒、修心、修慧」四修与寿命长短为判定现报还是后报(地狱报)之因缘——不修四修且寿命短者感地狱报,修四修且寿命长者感现法报。此种以修行功夫之深浅配合寿命长短作为判报标准之论法,乃本经所特有之取径。

4. 与相关概念的关系

「現法之報」与「地獄之報」在本经中构成对立之两极:前者为今生即受轻微之报,后者为死后堕地狱受重报。同一不善业因造业者根性差异而感不同之报,体现了「隨人所作業則受其報」之总原则。

就三时报之体系而言,现报与生报、后报并列。然在本经中,论者并未直接以三时报之框架展开论述,而是以「现法之报」与「地狱之报」之二分法呈现业报之差异,显示出本经在业报理论上之独特取径,与一般三时报之分类法有所区别。

5. 代表性原文引用

「隨人所作業則受其報」——明作业受报之总则。

「若有一兩盐投少水中者,彼若飲之則鹹不可飲」——喻不修四修、寿命短者感地狱报。

「若有一兩盐投恒水中者,彼若飲之則不鹹」——喻修四修、寿命长者感现法报。

「彼於現法設受善惡業報而輕微也」——总结修身修戒者虽作不善业,于现法受报轻微,不堕地狱。

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經以「隨人所作業則受其報」為總綱,特別針對「現報」(即現法之報——今生造業而於今生受報)展開論述。經中以「現法之報」一詞作為現報的正式術語,並未使用其他異稱。

一、核心表述與結構:經文將不善業的受報區分為兩種情況:「必受苦果地獄之報」與「必受苦果現法之報」,並以四項修養作為分野依據。若造業者「不修身、不修戒、不修心、不修慧,壽命甚短」,其罪業在來世地獄受報;若造業者「修身、修戒、修心、修慧,壽命極長」,因善業深厚,其罪業即在現法中受報。

二、三喻明現報之理:經中以三組譬喻反覆說明為何同樣作不善業,有人墮地獄,有人於現法受報。

(一)鹽水之喻:少水投一兩鹽,水即鹹不可飲,喻壽短慧薄者惡業力重,必受地獄果報;恒水投一兩鹽,不能令水鹹不可飲,喻慧命俱長者現法受報。

(二)奪羊之喻:奪他羊者有威勢,羊主貧弱無力,只能哀求得還,喻必受地獄之報;竊他羊者貧賤,羊主有威勢,當場奪還,喻現法即受其報。

(三)負債之喻:負債人貧無勢力,欠五錢乃至一錢皆為主所縛,喻必受地獄之報;負債人產業無量、極有勢力,欠百錢乃至千萬皆不為主所縛,喻現法受報。

三、現報之輕微:經末總結云:「彼於現法設受善惡業報而輕微也」,意即修養深厚、壽命長者雖於現生即受善惡業報,但因其心力堅固、善行重大,所受之果報較為輕微。

四、術語特徵:本經以「現法之報」稱現報,「地獄之報」稱來世地獄受報;以「修身、修戒、修心、修慧」四修並列,定慧等持為判定受報時處之關鍵;並以「壽命甚短」對「壽命極長」作為命根長短的判別。未見經中使用其他異名或異譯。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

此經論述「現報」之義,主要見於阿闍世王問佛之因緣,以及一段以偈頌形式反覆申明之詩文。

一、術語形式:經中以「現報」、「現世作福得受現報」、「現身作福得受現報」、「現世造福」等語表達此義,未見其他異譯名稱。

二、偈頌中的核心表述:經以偈頌雙雙對舉——「人天中受福,祇陀王子德,為善後受報,皆由現報故」;反之,「此憂彼亦憂,流離二處憂,為惡後受惡,皆由現報故」。無論獨自作善作惡無人所知,或於人天二處受福受憂,皆「皆由現報故」,強調現世造業即於現世得報,不必待於後世。

三、阿闍世王問現報之因緣:阿闍世王曾先後向六位外道(不蘭迦葉、阿夷耑、瞿耶樓、休迦栴、先毘盧持、尼揵子)請問「現世造福,得受現報不乎」,六人皆答非所問——或言「無福、無施」,或以殺害、三世、生死等餘義相酬,王皆捨去,最後詣佛所問。此段鋪陳顯示當時外道於此義多有錯謬,而佛之正說乃為對治。

四、佛以層層譬喻開示現報:佛不直說,先以王法為喻——典酒厨宰之屬執勞經久,王當賞遺;恤民以禮,王亦當賞;勞人求願,王隨所與;乃至此人剃髮著三法衣出家,王聽之、承事供養;此人持戒完具,王盡形壽供給衣被飲食床敷病藥;此人盡有漏成無漏、心解脫智慧解脫,王仍承事供養;此人於無餘涅槃界般涅槃,王於四衢道頭起大寺、懸繒幡蓋、香華供養。每結一喻,皆言「當以此方便,知現世作福得受現報」。以世間君臣賞勞之常理,比擬現世造善、現世得福之理,層層推進,乃至涅槃後起塔供養,亦屬現報之相。

五、結會勸信:阿闍世王由諸譬喻「於中受解」,即願歸佛,並懺悔殺父之罪。佛遂告以「世有二種人無罪而命終」——不造罪而修善者、改過遷善者,二人皆如屈伸臂頃得生天上。此雖旁涉,亦與現報之理相貫:修善之功不必待於來世。

綜觀此經,「現報」並非孤懸之說,而兼具偈頌的詩性總結與問答中層層譬喻的具體展開,為一部以「現世造福、現身受報」為正義、破斥六師邪解的完整論述。

大般涅槃經(北本)T0374 · 涅槃部

本經論述「現報」之義,主要使用「現世報」一詞,亦簡稱「現報」,並以「生報」「後報」相對而立。

一、現報之兩則本生事例

經中以兩則菩薩本生故事明示「現世報」之理。其一,菩薩昔與提婆達多共行於海,風暴破船,伴黨死盡,唯二人以不殺果報、長壽緣故得登陸地。提婆達多貪其寶珠,刺壞菩薩一目而劫珠他去。菩薩立誓:「若我今於提婆達多有惡心者,目當如是永為盲瞽;如其無者當還得眼。」言已其目平復如故,經文明結此為「菩薩摩訶薩說現世報」。其二,菩薩昔於南天竺富單那城外禪思度眾,迦羅富王性暴憍慢,見菩薩為其宮女說法,怒而截其耳、劓其鼻、刖其手足。菩薩久修慈悲,容色不變;四天王忿而降沙礫石,王遂怖而長跪懺悔。菩薩立誓「若我真實無瞋恨者,令我此身平復如故」,發願已身即平復,亦結名「說現世報」。

二、現報、生報、後報之三分

經中將業報分為三種並各舉其例:現報者,今生造業即於今生受報,如王作惡天降惡雨;又如有人示獵師羆處及寶色鹿,其手墮落,「是名惡業現受果報」。生報者,如一闡提、犯四重禁及五逆罪。後報者,如持戒人深發誓願,願未來世常得如是淨戒之身;又如眾生壽百年時,於八十年中當作轉輪聖王教化眾生。於第二則故事末,經文總結:「善男子!善業生報後報,及不善業,亦復如是。」明現報之理於善惡業皆適用。

三、定業與不定業

經云:「若業定得現世報者,則不能得生報、後報。菩薩摩訶薩修三十二大人相業,則不能得現世報也。若業不得三種報者,是名不定。」 此經明顯否定「一切業決定得報」之執:若執一切業定得三報,則修習梵行、解脫、涅槃皆不得成;執此者「非我弟子,是魔眷屬」。正見應為:定者具現報、生報、後報,不定者緣合則受、不合不受。以是義故,應有梵行、解脫、涅槃,當知是人真我弟子。經復云:「一切眾生不定業多,決定業少,以是義故,有修習道。修習道故,決定重業可使輕受,不定之業非生報受。」

四、業報輕重之轉變

經舉二種人明業報可由人為因素轉變:一者,不定作定,現報作生報,輕報作重報,應人中受者在地獄受;二者,定作不定,應生受者迴為現受,重報作輕,應地獄受者人中輕受。經以「智者善業多故重則輕受,愚者善業少故輕則重受」明其智愚之別,並以共沒深泥、肥壯得出羸瘦則沒、共服毒有無呪藥等譬喻顯之。

Related