Dharma · AI Companion

五部

pañca-kula

「五部」指密咒道如来五部族:佛(毘卢)、金刚、宝、莲华、羯磨,摄一切尊之种姓;不含毘昙见修所断五部染法及昙无德等五部律。AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

密教如来五部族与毘昙见修所断五类染法二读并列,无法定位主用法,跨度悬置

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么

When you first encounter the term 五部 (wǔ bù, "Five Divisions" or "Five Families," Skt. *pañca-kula*), the immediate challenge is that the same two Chinese characters are used to translate two radically different technical terms in two entirely different branches of Buddhist literature. The Abhidharma tradition, as systematized in the *Abhidharmakośa* (*阿毘達磨俱舍論*), uses "五部" to mean the five categories of defilements to be abandoned: those cut off by seeing the truth of suffering (見苦所斷), by seeing the origin of suffering (見集所斷), by seeing cessation (見滅所斷), by seeing the path (見道所斷), and those cut off by cultivation (修所斷). This is a purely analytical, psychological classification of mental afflictions—a map of what needs to be removed.

But the meaning we are concerned with here—the one that carries the weight of a full spiritual cosmology—is the Vajrayāna (密咒道) usage. In this context, 五部 refers to the five Buddha families (五部如來): the Buddha family (佛部), the Vajra family (金剛部), the Ratna family (寶部), the Padma family (蓮華部), and the Karma family (羯磨部). This is not a taxonomy of defilements to be cut off; it is a taxonomy of awakened potential. It is the structural grammar of the entire maṇḍala (曼陀羅), the assembly of all enlightened deities, and—as we shall see—the template for understanding every aspect of the practitioner's body, speech, and mind as inherently sacred.

Let us unpack this carefully. The term "部" here translates *kula*, which means "family" or "clan." Just as a human clan shares a lineage, a name, and certain traits, each Buddha family is a cluster of deities, colors, wisdom functions, and psychological energies that belong together. The five families are not five separate gods ruling different territories. They are five facets of a single, complete awakening—five styles of enlightened activity, five ways of transmuting the five primary poisons of the mind.

Here is the canonical mapping, drawn directly from the *Vajra Path Stages* texts (《密宗道次第論》 and 《密宗道次第廣論》):

1. 佛部 (Buddha family) — Lord: 毘盧遮那 (Vairocana). In the maṇḍala, this is the center. Its color is white, its element is space. Psychologically, it is associated with the wisdom of the dharmadhātu (法界體性智) and is the antidote for ignorance/confusion (愚痴) in the *Guhyasamāja* scheme, though the *Most Supreme Commentary* (《最勝大疏》) maps it to desire/attachment (貪欲行). Note this discrepancy—different texts assign the afflictions differently, showing that the mapping is functional, not dogmatic.

2. 金剛部 (Vajra family) — Lord: 不動 (Akṣobhya, "Immovable"). Positioned in the east. Its color is blue, its element is water. Its wisdom is mirror-like wisdom (大圓鏡智). It transmutes anger/hatred (瞋恚).

3. 寶部 (Ratna family) — Lord: 寶生 (Ratnasambhava, "Jewel-Born"). Positioned in the south. Its color is yellow, its element is earth. Its wisdom is the wisdom of equality (平等性智). It transmutes pride/avarice (我慢/慳悋). The *Most Supreme Commentary* specifically links it to miserliness (慳悋行).

4. 蓮華部 (Padma family) — Lord: 彌陀 (Amitāyus/Amitābha, "Boundless Light"). Positioned in the west. Its color is red, its element is fire. Its wisdom is discriminating wisdom (妙觀察智). It transmutes attachment/desire (貪著) and, in some schemes, the deluded or heretical aspect of ignorance (痴分或邪見行).

5. 羯磨部 (Karma family) — Lord: 義成 (Amoghasiddhi, "Infallible Success," also called 不空成就). Positioned in the north. Its color is green, its element is wind/air. Its wisdom is all-accomplishing wisdom (成所作智). It transmutes jealousy/envy (嫉妬).

A crucial subtlety arises in the *Vajra Path Stages* regarding the title "如來" (Tathāgata). The text states that while the term "如來" can broadly refer to all five Buddhas, the specific term "如來種姓" (Tathāgata clan) refers *exclusively* to the Vairocana (毘盧) family—its bodhisattvas and retinue—and not to the other four. This is a precise terminological discipline: the umbrella word is not interchangeable with the specific sub-family designation.

Another fascinating point is the structural "gap" in the root texts. The fundamental tantra of the Yoga class, the *Sarvatathāgatatattvasaṃgraha* (《攝真實經》), is organized in four chapters (四品) corresponding to four families: Buddha, Vajra, Ratna, and Padma. So where is the fifth, the Karma family? The texts quote the great commentator Buddhaguhya (佛密論師), who resolves this by explaining that the Ratna family (寶部) is established from the gate of fulfilling beings' wishes (成滿有情意樂之門), while the Karma family is established from the gate of enlightened activity (作業之門). Because the root text treats the "deed" (業) and the "doer" (作者) as unified, it folds both into a single chapter. Conceptually, however, five families remain fully operative. This is a beautiful example of how the tradition refuses to confuse textual structure with philosophical reality.

The five families also appear in ritual and yogic practice. In the thread-cross ritual (彈智線), five colored threads are used: white for Vairocana, yellow for Ratnasambhava, red for Amitābha, green for Amoghasiddhi (here named 義成), and blue for Akṣobhya. In the *Vajramālā Tantra* (《金剛鬘經》), the five root winds (五根本風) of the subtle body are assigned to the five families: the breath from the right nostril is the realm of Padma/Amitābha; the left nostril is the Karma lord; both nostrils together is the Ratna lord; the breath that is slow and unmoving is the Vajra lord; and the one that gives rise to all is Vairocana himself. These are not metaphors—they are instructions for a yogi to perceive the play of the five families directly in the flow of their own breath.

Finally, the term "五部" is also embedded in the vow structure. The texts speak of 五部律儀 (the vows of the five families) and 五部等戒. To receive the vows of the five families, one must receive the *vajra-ācārya* initiation (金剛阿闍黎灌頂). Merely receiving the "five wisdom" initiations (五明灌頂) does not entail these specific vows. This elevates "五部" from a mere classificatory scheme to a lived ethical commitment—a promise to embody the specific wisdom-energy of each family in one's conduct.

生活里的走查

Let us now take these five families and walk through an ordinary contemporary day with them. The key is to remember that these are not five personality types you *are*, nor five emotions you *have*. They are five lenses through which the same confused mind can be seen as already-awakened. Let us use the morning commute and the office.

Scene 1: The Crowded Subway (The Confusion of the Buddha Family)

You are standing on a packed train, scrolling through your phone. You are not reading anything in particular—you are just *absorbing*: headlines, images, a video of a cat, a notification from a work group chat. This state—mindless absorption, a blur of stimuli without a center—is precisely the energy of 愚痴 (ignorance/confusion). In the five-family scheme, this is the raw material of the Buddha family (佛部).

The common mistake here is to think that the Buddha family means "calm and wise." No. The Buddha family *begins* as the dull haze of not-knowing, the refusal to wake up. The practice is not to repress the haze but to recognize that this very haze, when seen clearly, is the *dharmadhātu wisdom* (法界體性智)—the space that holds all things without discrimination. The dull scrolling is space; the problem is you've lost the "I" that knows it is space. So the first step is simply to notice: "Ah, this is the ignorance energy. This is the seed of Vairocana." The white light is already there; you just need to stop drowning in the grey fog.

Scene 2: The Cut-Off Driver (The Anger of the Vajra Family)

A car cuts you off as you exit the station, or a colleague interrupts you mid-sentence. The heat rises instantly: a flash of irritation, a tightening in the chest. This is 瞋恚 (anger). This is the energy of the Vajra family (金剛部).

Again, the popular misunderstanding is that the Vajra family is about being "strong like a diamond"—that we should harden ourselves against anger. But the Vajra family is not about hardening; it is about clarity that cannot be shaken. The anger is a flash of sharp, precise energy that discriminates between "me" and "the obstacle." That sharpness is actually the mirror-like wisdom (大圓鏡智) in its confused form. It has the *quality* of reflection—it sees the object clearly—but it is distorted by the ego's stake in "me being wronged." The practice is not to suppress the flash but to let its inherent clarity show you the situation *without* the ego's overlay. The blue light of Akṣobhya is not the opposite of anger; it is anger stripped of its self-reference.

Scene 3: The Salary Comparison (The Miserliness of the Ratna Family)

Later, in a meeting, you learn a colleague got a promotion. A gnawing feeling arises—a tightness around the idea of "resources." You think, "I deserve that, not them." This is 慳悋 (miserliness/avarice) and its root, 我慢 (pride). This is the energy of the Ratna family (寶部).

The Ratna family is about *value* and *generosity*. The common mistake is to think, "I need to stop being stingy and just give things away." But the Ratna family's wisdom is the wisdom of *equality* (平等性智)—the deep recognition that all beings, including your promoted colleague, are equally worthy of the jewel of awakening. The stinginess is a misapplied sense of scarcity. The practice is to let the yellow light of Ratnasambhava illuminate the fact that *your value is not a finite resource*. The envy is the energy of comparison; the wisdom is the energy of recognizing that in the space of awakening, there is no "more" or "less."

Scene 4: The Attachment to the Phone (The Passion of the Padma Family)

Evening. You are at home, but you cannot put your phone down. You are refreshing a social feed, or you feel a pang of anxiety if your partner hasn't replied to your message. This is 貪著 (attachment/desire). This is the energy of the Padma family (蓮華部).

The Padma family is famously associated with love, speech, and the power of discrimination. The popular mistake is to conflate the Padma family with "romantic love" as a secular value. But the raw energy here is *clinging*—the desperate reaching for an object to fill a sense of lack. The red light of Amitābha is not the opposite of desire; it is desire turned inside out. Discriminating wisdom (妙觀察智) sees things *as they are*, without the projection of "I need this to be happy." When you feel the pull of the phone, that pull is the energy of connection. The practice is to let that energy connect *fully* to what is actually present—your breath, your room, the person next to you—rather than to the phantom promise of the next notification.

Scene 5: The Endless To-Do List (The Jealousy of the Karma Family)

You lie in bed, exhausted, mentally reviewing everything you did *not* accomplish. You feel a quiet bitterness toward people who seem to "do it all." This is 嫉妬 (jealousy/envy)—the sense that others are succeeding in *action* while you are stuck. This is the energy of the Karma family (羯磨部).

The Karma family is about *enlightened activity*—the spontaneous, effortless accomplishment of benefit for all beings. The common mistake is to equate it with "productivity" or "getting things done." The green light of Amoghasiddhi is not about ticking boxes. It is about the recognition that all actions, when free of the ego's need to be the *author* of their success, are already perfect. The jealousy you feel is the energy of *wanting to act*. The practice is to let that energy flow into the present moment without worrying about the outcome. The task list becomes a field of play, not a test of worth.

当代人为什么需要它

We live in an age of psychological fragmentation. We have a "work self," a "home self," a "social media self," and they often feel like strangers to one another. We are given two common tools to manage this: either we try to *suppress* the "negative" emotions (anger, greed, jealousy) and cultivate only the "positive" ones (calm, generosity, diligence), or we *express* them freely, hoping that catharsis will heal us. Both approaches treat these energies as fundamentally *impure*—something to be managed, contained, or released.

The five families offer a radically different premise: these energies are not impurities; they are the raw, unrefined form of wisdom itself. Anger is the wisdom of clarity without the ego. Desire is the wisdom of connection without grasping. Jealousy is the wisdom of action without competition. Ignorance is the wisdom of space without sleepiness. Pride is the wisdom of equality without comparison.

This is not just "positive thinking." It is a structural claim about reality. The maṇḍala is not a drawing; it is the actual architecture of a fully awakened mind. By mapping our daily experiences onto these five families, we move from a chaotic, reactive interior life to a cosmic, ordered one. We begin to see that every single moment—every flash of anger, every pang of envy, every dull scroll—is an invitation to recognize a specific wisdom. This gives the practitioner a precise, repeatable, and infinitely rich framework for self-transformation.

The contemporary mind loves frameworks. We have MBTI types, Enneagram numbers, Big Five personality traits. The five families can superficially resemble these—a way to "type" your behavior. But there is a crucial difference. Psychological typologies describe your *static personality*; they tell you who you *are*. The five families describe your *dynamic potential*; they tell you what your confusion *can become*. They are not boxes to fit into but doors to walk through. And unlike modern self-help, which often aims at "optimization" of the ego, the five families aim at the *dissolution* of the ego into a larger, sacred ecology of being.

We can even look at modern neuroscience or AI as a distant analogy. A neural network, for example, is not trained by deleting its "errors" but by *re-weighting* them—the very pathways that produce a wrong answer are the pathways that, with a slight adjustment, produce the right one. This is structurally similar to the Vajrayāna claim that the five poisons are, at root, the five wisdoms. But we must be careful: this is an analogy, not a proof. Science does not, and cannot, confirm the sacred architecture of the maṇḍala. It simply shows us that the idea of "transmutation rather than elimination" is not alien to nature. The Vajrayāna framework, however, is not a cognitive therapy. It is a *soteriological* path—a path to liberation—rooted in initiation, deity yoga, and the profound view of emptiness. We do a disservice to both science and Dharma if we collapse one into the other.

常见误读与澄清

Misreading 1: Confusing the Vajrayāna "五部" with the Abhidharma "五部."

This is the most fundamental error, and the source material is explicit about it. The *Abhidharmakośa* (《俱舍論》) uses "五部" to mean the five categories of defilements to be abandoned (見苦所斷, 見集所斷, 見滅所斷, 見道所斷, 修所斷). This is a map of *what needs to be destroyed*. The Vajrayāna "五部" is a map of *what is already present as awakening*. One is a surgical list of diseases; the other is a blueprint of health. If you read a text about "五部" and assume it is talking about abandoning defilements, you will completely miss the point. Always check the context: is this a *sūtra/abhidharma* context (cutting off) or a *tantra* context (recognizing)?

Misreading 2: "如來" and "如來種姓" are the same thing.

The *Vajra Path Stages* (《密宗道次第論》) is very precise: "如來" (Tathāgata) can refer to any of the five Buddhas—it is a generic honorific. But "如來種姓" (Tathāgata clan) refers *only* to the Vairocana family (毘盧部) and its bodhisattvas. The other four families—Vajra, Ratna, Padma, Karma—have their own clan names. This is not pedantry; it preserves the specificity of the maṇḍala's structure. Calling all five families "如來" is fine; calling them all "如來種姓" blurs the distinct functions they perform.

Misreading 3: "There are only four families."

This arises because the root text, the *Sarvatathāgatatattvasaṃgraha*, is organized in four chapters. But the tradition, via Buddhaguhya (佛密論師), explicitly fills the gap: the Karma family (羯磨部) is conceptually present. The root text merges it with the Ratna family because the "deed" (業) and the "doer" (作者) are seen as one. So when someone says the fundamental tantra only speaks of four, they are correct about the text but wrong about the doctrine. The five-fold structure is philosophically irreducible.

Misreading 4: The colors, winds, and threads are superstitious or merely symbolic.

The five-colored threads (彈智線) and the five root winds (五根本風) are not decorative. They are *functional* in tantric ritual and yoga. The colored thread is used to bind the practitioner to the maṇḍala's energy; the breath instructions are for the yogi to perceive the play of the five wisdoms in the subtle body. To dismiss them as "just symbols" is to miss the tantric methodology of using the physical body and material objects as a *direct* support for realization. However, we must also be careful not to literalize them in a modern, materialist sense. The "winds" are not the oxygen molecules of physiology; they are the *prāṇa* of the subtle body. This is a different register of truth, accessible through yogic practice, not a claim that can be verified or falsified by a spirometer.

Misreading 5: The five families are five types of gods.

They are *buddhas*—awakened beings—not deities in the polytheistic sense. They are manifestations of the *single* awakening, appearing in five forms to address the five primary afflictions of sentient beings. In the maṇḍala, they are inseparable. To pray to Vairocana is to pray to all; to see Akṣobhya is to see the whole. The five families are a *teaching device* and a *realization map*, not a pantheon of separate saviors. The *Vajra Path Stages* says that all five families together are the "五部如來" (Five-Family Tathāgatas), and they are gathered in the single figure of Vairocana, who is "具五部" (possessing the five families). The unity is primary; the diversity is the display.


In the end, the five families (五部) are an invitation to stop treating your inner life as a battlefield and start treating it as a maṇḍala. The anger, the greed, the envy—these are not enemies to be vanquished. They are the five seed-syllables of your own awakening, written in the ink of confusion. The practice is not to change what arises, but to change *how you relate to what arises*—to see, in the flash of hatred, the mirror-wisdom of Akṣobhya; in the ache of desire, the discriminating love of Amitābha; in the dull fog of a scrolling trance, the vast space of Vairocana. When you can do that, you are no longer a person struggling with afflictions. You are a living mandala, complete, whole, and already free.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

定义与核心要义

「五部」(pañca-kula)为佛教中以「部」分类之术语,惟此词于不同部类之经论中内涵迥异。藏传论典部所收《密宗道次第论》《密宗道次第广论》以「五部」统摄密教本尊、种姓与修道品类,指如来部、金刚部、莲华部、宝部、羯磨部五族部类及其主尊、菩萨、修行等事。而毘昙部所收《阿毘达磨俱舍论》之「五部」,则指见苦所断、见集所断、见灭所断、见道所断、修所断五类,乃就所断位次对染污法所作之分类,与密教部族之义全然不同。

主要阐述

藏传论典部方面,《密宗道次第论》指出「如来」一词可通指五部如来,然「如来种姓」则专指毘卢部之菩萨等,不含其余四部之菩萨等,显示此论对「如来」与「如来种姓」之适用范围有明确区别。 就五部配置而言,第一品显示毘卢部(佛部),第二品显示不动部(金刚部),第三品显示弥陀部(莲华部),第四品显示宝生部(宝部),尚有羯磨部,合为五部。 对于根本经仅说四部而实具五部之情形,论中引佛密论师之说解释:宝部就成满有情意乐之门而立,羯磨部则就作业之门而立;由于将作业及作者摄为一部,故于四品组织中合说,而义理上仍成立五部。 又此论讨论「五部律仪」「五部等戒」,明言若受五部律仪须受金刚阿阇黎灌顶,若仅受五明灌顶则不须受五部律仪,是「五部」亦关联特定灌顶层级所摄之戒律用语。

《密宗道次第广论》亦依《摄真实经》瑜伽部根本经四品配五部:佛部即毘卢遮那种性,金刚部即不动种性,莲华部即弥陀种性,宝部即宝生种性,并明言「五部之中,根本经仅说其四」,引佛密论师之说以「就作者门即是宝部,就作业门即羯磨部,业与作者二合为一」之理补出第五羯磨部。 此论沿用《最胜大疏》之判,将五部配四类补特伽罗烦恼行相:佛部配贪欲行,金刚部配瞋恚行,莲华部配痴分或邪见行,宝部配悭悋行。 于《集密》等无上瑜伽法中,则以五部对治愚痴、我慢、贪着、嫉妬、瞋恚五惑。 弹智线仪轨以五色线配五部:白为毘卢,黄为宝生,红为弥陀,绿为义成,蓝为不动,以五部种子咒字为体。 修法目次分列佛部、金刚部、宝部、莲华部四品修法,附「略说修法」总摄。 又依《金刚鬘经》,五根本风配五部:右鼻出风为莲主弥陀所游行,左鼻出者为业主所游行,二鼻俱出者为宝主所游行,徐缓无动者为金刚主不动所游行,出生一切者即毘卢佛身。

毘昙部方面,《阿毘达磨俱舍论》于释「同类因」处,界定「部谓五部,即见苦所断乃至修所断」,以见四谛之智所断者为前四部,依修道所断者为第五部。论主以此五部限定同类因之范围:「见苦所断法还与见苦所断为同类因非余,如是乃至修所断还与修所断法为同类因非余」,强调同部相望方有同类因之义,异部相望皆无因义。 此外,论中 chunk:23979「由结等差别,复说有五种」系以五数标示某法之别;chunk:24129「由杂修五品,生有五净居」,明言由杂修静虑之五品感生无烦、无热、善现、善见、色究竟五净居天。二者虽涉「五」数,皆非密教五大部族之义。

不同部类与译本的表述差异

藏传论典部二论皆以五部主尊通称「毘卢佛、宝生、弥陀、不动」配羯磨部,然名称略异:《密宗道次第论》用「如来种姓」「金刚种姓」「莲华种姓」「宝种姓」与部名并举;《密宗道次第广论》于弹线仪轨中第四部名「义成」(绿色),与他部派异名或有不同。「羯磨部」之名依佛密论师补出,未于根本经中直接宣说。 又《密宗道次第论》转述《苏悉地经》事续时另用「佛部、莲华部、金刚部」三部之名,依所得灌顶分别限定修尊、诵咒与听经之自在范围;论中自称「事续三部」,与瑜伽续「五部」并用而不混同。

与相关概念之关系

藏传论典部中,「五部」与「五部律仪」「五部等戒」相关,涉及灌顶层级之戒律;亦与「五部如来」「五部种子」「五色线」「五根本风」等仪轨与修行体系相涉。 毘昙部之「五部」则与「同类因」「自部自地」之界域划分直接相关,乃部派毘昙学依所断位次区分染法之分类术语。 二种「五部」同名而异实,内涵全然不同。

代表性原文引用

- 「部谓五部,即见苦所断乃至修所断。」(《阿毘达磨俱舍论》) - 「如来种姓」专指毘卢部菩萨等,不含其余四部。(《密宗道次第论》) - 「就成满有情意乐之门称为宝部,从作业之门则称为羯摩部。」(《密宗道次第论》引佛密论师) - 「就作者门即是宝部,就作业门即羯磨部,业与作者二合为一。」(《密宗道次第广论》引佛密论师) - 「五根本风」各配莲主、业主、宝主、金刚主、毘卢。(《密宗道次第广论》引《金刚鬘经》)

By SutraAI-generated

密宗道次第論B0057 · 藏傳論典部

《密宗道次第論》論「五部」,主要以「五部如來」「如來種姓」「金剛種姓」「蓮華種姓」「寶種姓」「羯摩部」等語,說明瑜伽續所攝諸尊、種姓與修道品類。論中指出,「如來」一詞可以通指五部如來;但「如來種姓」則專指毘盧部的菩薩等,不包括其餘四部的菩薩等。這顯示本論對「如來」與「如來種姓」的適用範圍有明確區別,不能視為同義通稱。

就五部的配置而言,第一品顯示如來及如來種姓之道,即毘盧部;第二品顯示金剛種姓,即不動部;第三品顯示蓮華種姓,即彌陀部;第四品顯示成滿有情欲樂的寶種姓,即寶生部之道。除此之外,尚有羯摩部,故全體「具有五部」。本論在名稱上既用「部」,又用「種姓」,並以部主佛名標示其所屬,如「毘盧部」「不動部」「彌陀部」「寶生部」。

對於根本經僅說四部而實具五部的情形,本論引佛密論師之說加以解釋:從成滿有情意樂之門稱為寶部,從作業之門則稱為羯摩部;由於將作業及作者攝為一部,故在四品的組織中合說,而義理上仍成立五部。這是本論論述五部時較具特色的一面,即以「成滿意樂」與「作業」兩門說明寶部、羯摩部既可合攝而又有差別。

五部也見於灌頂與律儀的討論。本論稱「五部律儀」或「五部等戒」,並指出若受五部律儀,須受金剛阿闍黎灌頂;若只受五明灌頂,則不須受五部律儀。由此可見,「五部」不僅是諸尊及種姓的分類,也成為特定灌頂層級所關聯的戒律用語。

此外,本論轉述《蘇悉地經》所說事續三部時,另用佛部、蓮華部、金剛部三部之名,依所得灌頂分別限定修尊、誦咒與聽經的自在範圍。此處原文明言為「事續三部」,不應與前述瑜伽續「五部」混同;本論自身即依不同論述場合使用「三部」與「五部」兩套術語。

密宗道次第廣論B0068 · 藏傳論典部

此論以「五部」統攝密教諸尊部族。依《攝真實經》瑜伽部根本經之四品對應:如來及如來部即毘盧遮那種性,金剛部即不動種性,蓮華部即彌陀種性,寶部即寶生種性。論中明言「五部之中,根本經僅說其四」,並引佛密論師之說補出第五羯磨部,以「就作者門即是寶部,就作業門即羯磨部,業與作者二合為一」之理成立。

此論沿用《最勝大疏》之判,將五部配四類補特伽羅煩惱行相:佛部行為貪欲行,金剛部為瞋恚行,蓮華部為痴分或邪見行,寶部為慳悋行。於《集密》等無上瑜伽法中,則以五部印證對治愚痴、我慢、貪著、嫉妬、瞋恚五惑。

正行儀軌中,彈智線以五色線配五部:白為毘盧,黃為寶生,紅為彌陀,綠為義成,藍為不動,並以「五部種子」咒字為體。曼陀羅繪成後,請諸如來降臨時以「具五部」之毘盧佛等為請說之境。修法目次中分列「佛部修法、金剛部修法、寶部修法、蓮華部修法」四品修法,附「略說修法」總攝。

又依《金剛鬘經》,五根本風配五部:右鼻出風為火曼陀羅、赤紅色、蓮主(彌陀)所遊行;左鼻出者為風曼陀羅、黃綠色、業主所遊行;二鼻俱出者現金色、地輪、寶主所遊行;徐緩無動者如水晶、水輪、金剛主(不動)所遊行;出生一切者即毘盧佛身。

此論所用術語方面,五部主尊統稱「毘盧佛、寶生、彌陀、不動」,第四部於彈線儀軌中名「義成」(綠色),與他部派之異名或有不同。「羯磨部」之名則依佛密論師補出,未於根本經中直接宣說。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》現存引文中,僅 chunk:23340 明確標舉「五部」一詞。論主於釋「同類因」之際,闡明「自部自地」之義,隨即界定:「部謂五部,即見苦所斷乃至修所斷」——即以見苦所斷、見集所斷、見滅所斷、見道所斷、修所斷五類為五部之內容。此五部係就所斷位次而對染污法所作的分類:依見四諦之智所斷者為前四部,依修道所斷者為第五部。論主接著以此五部限定同類因之範圍:「此中見苦所斷法還與見苦所斷為同類因非餘,如是乃至修所斷還與修所斷法為同類因非餘」,強調同部相望方有同類因之義,異部相望皆無因義。文中以「乃至」一詞概括中三見所斷,論述精簡而以五部並列。

需附記者:本論此處之「五部」,乃部派毘曇學依「所斷位次」而區分染法之部類術語,與密教以佛部、蓮花部、金剛部、寶部、羯磨部統攝本尊、曼陀羅之五大部族,內涵全然不同。論中僅以「五部」作為同類因之界域劃分,並未涉及密教部族之名義、五方佛之配置或五智之體系。同名而異實,當由上層條目分別呈現。

至於 chunk:23979「由結等差別,復說有五種」,係以偈頌略標某法有五種之別;chunk:24129「由雜修五品,生有五淨居」,明言由雜修靜慮之五品差別感生五淨居天(無煩、無熱、善現、善見、色究竟)。二塊雖涉「五」之數,然所指皆非密教五大部族之義。

Related