Dharma · AI Companion

摩得勒伽

mātṛkā

分类纲要式的论藏教法AI-generated

Type GenreDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

One-Sentence Definition: In the *Sūtra of Unbinding Deep Mystery* (*Shenmi Jietuo Jing*, T0675), Mātṛkā (摩得勒伽) is placed alongside the *Sūtra*s (經) and *Vinaya* (律) and explicitly defined as the "definitive teachings manifested through eleven aspects" (十一種相示現了義經).


What This Concept Is Saying (這個概念在說什麼)

To understand Mātṛkā, we must first look at its etymology and role in the Buddhist canon. The Sanskrit term *mātṛkā* literally translates to "mother," "matrix," or "source table." In early Buddhist traditions, Mātṛkā referred to the analytical matrices or summaries used to preserve, codify, and dissect the Buddha's teachings—ultimately evolving into what we know as the *Abhidharma* (the Abhidhamma Pitaka or Abhidharma Treatise Collection).

However, in the *Sūtra of Unbinding Deep Mystery* (*Shenmi Jietuo Jing*, translated by Bodhiruci during the Northern Wei), Mātṛkā receives a profound and elevated definition. It is not merely an external index or scholastic footnote; it stands as one of the three foundational pillars of the Buddha’s teaching, equal in importance to *Sūtra* (修多羅, the direct discourses) and *Vinaya* (毘尼, the ethical rules and discipline).

While the Sūtras establish fundamental doctrines and the Vinaya provides behavioral standards (such as the *Prātimokṣa* / 波羅提木叉), **Mātṛkā acts as the definitive engine (*nītārtha* / 了義)**. It takes the vast array of discourses and practices and organizes them into an analytical, eleven-dimensional matrix (十一種相). Through this framework, a practitioner can inspect any phenomenon or practice, separating conventional metaphors from ultimate truths, discerning what causes spiritual progress, and understanding what obstructs liberation.

The Core Matrix: The Eleven Aspects (十一種相)

In the *Shenmi Jietuo Jing*, Mātṛkā is explicitly defined as the "definitive teachings manifested through eleven aspects" (十一種相示現了義經). These eleven aspects form a comprehensive analytical framework:

1. Aspect of Conventional Truth (世諦相): This aspect deals with reality as experienced and spoken of in everyday, mundane terms. It is further divided into three concrete expressions: * *Describing persons (說人相)*: Referencing conventional identities ("I," "you," "a person"). * *Describing differentiated entities (說分別體相)*: Classifying discrete phenomena and their individual characteristics. * *Observing phenomena and contemplating the performance of various deeds (觀諸法思惟作種種業相)*: Examining how mental intention leads to physical, verbal, and mental karma.

2. Aspect of Ultimate Truth (第一義諦相 / 勝義諦): The ultimate nature of reality, which the text unfolds into seven distinct ultimate truths corresponding to seven aspects of Thusness (*Tathatā* / 真如). Crucially, these ultimate truths express absolute universality and equality (平等無差別): * *Ultimate Truth of Beginningless Conditioned Manifestations (無始有為行相第一義諦)*: The ultimate nature of the timeless cycle of conditioned existence. (Equal and non-different across all sentient beings). * *Ultimate Truth of Characteristics (相第一義諦)*: Defined explicitly as "emptiness of self, emptiness of phenomena" (我空、法空). (Equal and non-different across all phenomena). * *Ultimate Truth of Consciousness-Only (唯識第一義諦)*: Defined in Bodhiruci’s unique translation as "knowing that conditioned manifestations are strictly mind and consciousness" (知有為行唯是心識). (Equal and non-different across all phenomena). * *Ultimate Truth of Attachment (執著第一義諦)*: Corresponding to the Truth of Suffering (苦諦). (Equal and non-different across all sentient beings). * *Ultimate Truth of Corrupted Action (邪行第一義諦)*: Corresponding to the Truth of Arising/Origin (集諦). (Equal and non-different across all sentient beings). * *Ultimate Truth of Purity (清淨第一義諦)*: Corresponding to the Truth of Cessation (滅諦). Equal across the supreme awakening of Hearers (*Śrāvakas*), Solitary Realizers (*Pratyekabuddhas*), and Bodhisattvas. * *Ultimate Truth of Correct Practice (正修行第一義諦)*: Corresponding to the Truth of the Path (道諦). Equal when hearing the distinctions of the sublime Dharma, practicing *Śamatha* (奢摩他, calm abiding) and *Vipaśyanā* (毘婆舍那, insight observation), and integrating *Prajñāpāramitā* (般若波羅蜜, perfection of wisdom).

3. Aspect of Observing the Factors of Awakening (觀菩提分法相): The systematic contemplation and discernment of the factors that lead to enlightenment.

4. Aspect of That Dharma (彼法相): The specific characteristics and domain of the particular teaching or phenomenon under inspection.

5. Aspect of Own-Nature / Intrinsic Reality (自體相 / 彼法自體相): The concrete practices themselves that embody the path, specifically defined as applying observation to the factors of awakening, such as the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (四念處: mindfulness of body, feelings, mind, and mental objects).

6. Aspect of Fruit / Results (彼法果相 / 得相): The mundane and supramundane fruits, attainments, and virtues born from abandoning defilements through correct practice.

7. Aspect of Receiving and Expounding That Dharma (受彼法說相 / 彼法隨順示現相): Experiencing and using the Dharma through liberation-wisdom (*vimukti-jñāna*), and skillfully explaining and manifesting it to others.

8. Aspect of Obstacles to That Dharma (彼法障相 / 向障法): The defiled mental states and worldly distractions that run counter to the path and hinder the growth of awakening.

9. Aspect of Accordance with That Dharma (彼法隨順相 / 隨順彼法相): The supportive conditions, mental factors, and environments that allow wholesome teachings to arise and increase.

10. Aspect of Faults in Relation to That Dharma (彼法過失相 / 過相): The spiritual flaws, misunderstandings, and errors that impede or destroy wholesome states.

11. Aspect of Benefits of That Dharma (彼法利益相 / 利益相): The spiritual merits, peace, and liberation benefits that naturally flow from practicing in accord with the Dharma.

Supplementary Structural Concepts: 法體相 & 略廣相

Beyond the eleven aspects, the text highlights two crucial operational principles: * Aspect of Dharma-Substance (法體相): The abiding, intrinsic reality of Dharma (*Dharmatā* / 法界)—whether a Buddha appears in the world or not, the underlying nature of reality remains constant. * Aspect of Conciseness and Expansion (略廣相): The methodology of analytical discourse—moving from a single concise summary phrase (*brief statement*) up to higher, infinite detailed phrases (*expanded exposition*), until the ultimate destination of understanding is reached.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life (生活里的走查)

To see how Mātṛkā functions as a practical engine rather than an abstract taxonomy, let us walk through a common contemporary experience using the eleven-aspect matrix.

The Scenario: Imagine you are at work and receive an abrupt, critical email from your manager regarding a project you poured weeks into. Immediately, your chest tightens, anxiety surges, and you begin drafting an angry reply in your head.

How does Mātṛkā audit this moment?

1. Conventional Truth (世諦相): * *Describing persons*: You think, "My boss is unfair," and "I am being targeted." * *Describing entities*: You categorize the email as "harsh text on a screen." * *Observing deeds*: You notice your intention to write a vengeful email (karma in the making). 2. Ultimate Truth (第一義諦相): * *Consciousness-Only*: You pause and recognize that the anger and threat you feel are not literally inside the pixels on your phone; "conditioned manifestations are strictly mind and consciousness." The emotional impact is a construct of your own mind interpreting the sensory data. * *Emptiness of Self and Phenomena*: You realize the "disregarded worker" is a temporary mental construct, devoid of an enduring, solid self (*ātman*). * *Four Noble Truths*: You see your immediate suffering (*Truth of Attachment / 苦諦*) and the underlying craving/clinging to approval that caused it (*Truth of Corrupted Action / 集諦*). You realize peace is possible if this clinging ceases (*Truth of Purity / 滅諦*), which requires applying mindful discernment (*Truth of Correct Practice / 道諦*). 3. Observing Factors of Awakening (觀菩提分法相): You shift your focus from reacting to observing the situation using the framework of enlightenment factors. 4. Intrinsic Reality (自體相): You ground yourself directly in the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (四念處)—observing the physical sensation of tightness in your chest (mindfulness of body) and the burning feeling of frustration (mindfulness of feelings). 5. Obstacles (彼法障相): You label your impulse to retaliate or fall into despair as a spiritual obstacle—a defilement that will derail your inner peace and career. 6. Accordance (彼法隨順相): You take three slow breaths and step away from your desk to grab a glass of water, setting up favorable conditions to restore clarity. 7. Faults (彼法過失相): You recognize that sending a reactive email will only exacerbate conflict, proving counterproductive to your peace. 8. Benefits (彼法利益相): You recognize the benefit of maintaining composure: immediate emotional balance and long-term wisdom. 9. Fruit / Attainment (彼法果相): As your heart rate drops, you experience the peaceful fruit of non-attachment—a mundane calm that hints at ultimate supramundane liberation. 10. Receiving & Expounding (受彼法說相): Having navigated the crisis calmly, you are later able to share a calm, constructive response with your boss—and perhaps offer balanced advice to a colleague going through similar stress. 11. Dharma Domain / That Dharma (彼法相): You see this entire workplace incident clearly for what it was: a temporary, conditioned phenomenon governed by cause and effect.

Common Mismapping Warning: Most people mistake Buddhism’s analytical matrices for cold intellectualization or over-analysis. They assume that labeling an experience disables genuine emotion. In reality, Mātṛkā’s eleven-fold audit does not repress emotion; it dissects the illusion of a solid crisis into manageable, workable components, preventing emotional reactivity from turning into prolonged suffering.

Why Contemporary People Need It (現代人為甚麼需要它)

Modern life is flooded with information, algorithms, and complex choices, yet people suffer from an acute lack of framework. We live in an age of fragmented advice—self-help books, productivity hacks, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness apps—yet these often feel like disconnected tools.

Mātṛkā provides a master matrix.

1. An Anti-Fragile Mental Architecture: In an era dominated by algorithmic feeds designed to hook our emotions, Mātṛkā acts like an internal diagnostic software. Instead of being swept away by outrage or anxiety, Mātṛkā provides an immediate structure to categorize and process input. 2. Bridging Science and Liberation: We can draw a parallel to modern Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or Neuroscience. CBT uses "thought records" to dissect emotional triggers into automatic thoughts, emotional responses, and cognitive distortions. neuroscience explains how the brain creates predictive models of reality. Mātṛkā functions similarly as a rigorous analytical tool, but its target goes far deeper. While CBT aims for social adaptability and emotional baseline management, Mātṛkā uses its matrix (such as the *Consciousness-Only* and *Emptiness* ultimate truths) to deconstruct the root illusion of the ego entirely, aiming for ultimate liberation (*mokṣa*). *(Note: While these parallels help us understand Mātṛkā's methodology, modern psychology is geared toward functional living within society, whereas Mātṛkā is oriented toward unbinding from worldly clinging altogether. Science describes psychological mechanisms; Mātṛkā guides the path to liberation.)* 3. From Confusion to Unbinding: Without a structural framework like Mātṛkā, spiritual practice easily degrades into vague quietism or emotional suppression. Mātṛkā gives practitioners a precise roadmap: it tells you *what* you are observing, *where* you are stuck, *what* obstacles to abandon, and *how* to cultivate the path.


Common Misinterpretations & Clarifications (常見誤讀與澄清)

* Misinterpretation 1: "Mātṛkā is just dry scholasticism or dead commentary." * Clarification: In early historical Buddhism, Mātṛkā did form the basis for scholastic treatises (Abhidharma). However, in the *Shenmi Jietuo Jing*, Mātṛkā is explicitly identified as a definitive Sūtra itself (十一種相示現了義經). It is not secondary academic commentary; it is the living, ultimate key to unlocking the true meaning (*nītārtha*) of all of the Buddha's teachings.

* Misinterpretation 2: "Is 'Consciousness-Only' (唯識) in this text just a philosophical theory about metaphysics?" * Clarification: The text defines *Ultimate Truth of Consciousness-Only* as "knowing that conditioned manifestations are strictly mind and consciousness" (知有為行唯是心識). This is not an abstract metaphysical theory to debate in seminars. It is an experiential ultimate truth (*paramārtha-satya*) meant to be realized during meditation (*Śamatha* and *Vipaśyanā*). When you realize that your perceived world of suffering is a projection built by mental habits, clinging dissolves.

* Misinterpretation 3: "Are the eleven aspects just an arbitrary list of eleven distinct things?" * Clarification: They are an integrated, dynamic matrix. They span from the baseline of reality (*Conventional* vs. *Ultimate Truths*), through the practice (*Factors of Awakening*, *Mindfulness*), to the operational dynamics (*Obstacles*, *Supports*, *Faults*, *Benefits*), and finally to the result (*Fruit* and *Sharing the Dharma*). It covers the full arc of spiritual transformation from entanglement to liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在元魏菩提流支所译的《深密解脱经》(《深密解脫經》)中,「摩得勒伽」(mātṛkā,即论藏的母体)占有极其重要的地位。佛陀在经中将「摩得勒伽」与「修多罗」(经)、「毘尼」(律)并列,视为修行者应当了知的三种基本法。对于摩得勒伽的核心定义,本经明确指出,佛陀所说的「摩得勒伽」即是「十一种相示现了义经」。这意味着,摩得勒伽不仅是论书的源头,在本经的语境下,它更是一种通过十一种特定维度(相)来系统化示现、阐释佛法「了义」的经典体系。

二、主要阐述:十一种相的具体内涵

根据《深密解脱经》的阐释,摩得勒伽所包含的「十一种相」构成了其组织和解析一切教法的核心矩阵。这十一种相分别为:世谛相、第一义谛相、观菩提分法相、彼法相、自体相、彼法果相、受彼法说相、彼法障相、彼法随顺相、彼法过失相、以及彼法利益相。本经对其中关键的相进行了极为详尽的分类与定义:

1. 世谛相(世俗谛):本经指出世谛相包含三种具体表现,即「说人相」、「说分别体相」以及「观诸法思惟作种种业相」。 2. 第一义谛相(胜义谛):本经将第一义谛相细分为七种,并与「七种真如」相对应。这七种第一义谛分别是: - 无始有为行相第一义谛:指无始以来的有为行相。 - 相第一义谛:即「我空、法空」。 - 唯识第一义谛:定义为「知有为行唯是心识」。 - 执着第一义谛:即佛所说的「苦谛」。 - 邪行第一义谛:即佛所说的「集谛」。 - 清净第一义谛:即佛所说的「灭谛」。 - 正修行第一义谛:即佛所说的「道谛」。 此外,这七种第一义谛皆具备「平等无差别」的特征:其中,「行相」、「执着」与「邪行」三种第一义谛,在一切众生中平等无差别;「相」与「唯识」二种第一义谛,在一切法中平等无差别;「清净」第一义谛,在声闻、缘觉、菩萨的无上菩提中平等无差别;「正修行」第一义谛,则在听闻妙法差别、观察「奢摩他」与「毘婆舍那」并摄取「般若波罗蜜」时,平等无差别。 3. 自体相与得相(果相)等其余诸相: - 自体相(或称「彼法自体相」):指「取诸法见观菩提分法」,具体如佛所说的「四念处」等菩提分法。 - 得相(即「彼法果相」):指共世间、出世间、远离染污的相,以及由彼法之果所发起的世间与出世间功德。 - 受彼法说相(又称「彼法随顺示现相」):指依据解脱智来受用彼法,并广为他人宣说与示现。 - 彼法障相(又称「向障法」):指在修行菩提分法时,应当远离的与道相违背的染污法。 - 彼法随顺相(又称「随顺彼法相」):指能令彼法多生并增长的事物。 - 彼法过失相(又称「过相」):指障碍诸法的事物。 - 彼法利益相(又称「利益相」):指随顺彼法的种种功德。 4. 其他相关概念(法体相与略广相): - 法体相:指「如来出世及不出世,法住、法体、法界」。 - 略广相(或「略说」):指从略说一句,到上上句、无量差别句,乃至说至应达之处的过程。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《深密解脱经》(元魏菩提流支译本)中,存在诸多极具特色的独特术语与表述方式,与其他译本或部类有所不同: 1. 第一义谛与唯识术语:本译本将胜义谛统称为「第一义谛相」,并在七种第一义谛中提出了「唯识第一义谛」与「相第一义谛」。其中,「唯识第一义谛」被明确定义为「知有为行唯是心识」,这是本译本中非常独特且直接的唯识学术语表达;而「相第一义谛」则被定义为「我空、法空」。 2. 禅修与戒律术语:本经在涉及修行实践时,将禅修方法译为「奢摩他」与「毘婆舍那」;在涉及戒律与教法组织时,则使用「波罗提木叉」这一术语。 3. 诸相名称的同经异称:在本经内部,对于十一种相及相关概念,存在多种交替使用的名称。例如:「自体相」又被表述为「彼法自体相」;「得相」又被表述为「彼法果相」;「受彼法说相」又被表述为「彼法随顺示现相」;「彼法障相」又被表述为「向障法」;「彼法随顺相」又被表述为「随顺彼法相」;「彼法过失相」又被表述为「过相」;「彼法利益相」则又被表述为「利益相」。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「修多罗」及「毘尼」的关系: 「摩得勒伽」与「修多罗」(经)、「毘尼」(律)共同构成了佛教教法的三大支柱。本经强调,这三者是修行者「应知」的法。修多罗负责宣说基础教义,毘尼负责规范行为与戒律(如波罗提木叉),而摩得勒伽则作为「了义经」,通过十一种相的矩阵,对经律中的深奥义理进行系统化的组织、分类与抉择。 2. 与「奢摩他」、「毘婆舍那」及「般若波罗蜜」的关系: 在「正修行第一义谛」的范畴中,摩得勒伽将禅修的「奢摩他」(止)与「毘婆舍那」(观)以及「般若波罗蜜」(智慧)纳入其平等无差别的体系之中。修行者在听闻妙法、观察止观并摄取般若波罗蜜时,即是在实践正修行第一义谛,这体现了摩得勒伽作为指导具体修行的了义教法功能。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于三种应知之法:「应知三种法。何等为三。一者修多罗。二者毘尼。三者摩得勒伽。」 2. 关于摩得勒伽的定义与十一种相:「佛言。大德。摩得勒伽者。谓十一种相示现了义经。何等十一。一者世谛相。二者第一义谛相。三者观菩提分法相。四者彼法相。五者自体相。六者彼法果相。七者受彼法说相。八者彼法障相。九者彼法随顺相。十者彼法过失相。十一者彼法利益相。」 3. 关于自体相、得相、法体相与略广相的定义:「彼法自体相者。谓取诸法见观菩提分法。四念处等。彼法果相者。谓共世间出世间远离染污相。及彼果发起世间出世间功德。……法体相者。谓如来出世及不出世。法住法体法界。略广相者。谓略说一句。上上句无量差别句。乃至说至应达之处。」

By SutraAI-generated

深密解脫經T0675 · 經集部

《深密解脫經》(元魏菩提流支譯)將摩得勒伽置於「三藏教法」的結構性框架中加以界定。經中佛告文殊師利:「謂說修多羅、毘尼、摩得勒伽。文殊師利!是為三種應知。」 亦即摩得勒伽與修多羅(經)、毘尼(律)並列為佛所說教法的三大門類。經中先分別界定修多羅為「少事法」(四種事、九種事、二十九種事),毘尼為「波羅提木叉及波羅提木叉相應法」,而後文殊師利追問「何者是摩得勒伽」,佛答:「我所說十一種相示現了義經,是名摩得勒伽。」 此即本經對摩得勒伽的核心定義——以十一種相來開顯了義經的綱要體系。

所謂十一種相為:世諦相、第一義諦相、觀菩提分法相、彼法相、自體相、彼法果相、受彼法說相、彼法障相、彼法隨順相、彼法過失相、彼法利益相。 此十一相構成一套從世俗諦到勝義諦、從法體到果用、從障礙到利益的完整分類綱目,正體現「摩得勒伽」作為分類綱要式論藏教法的功能。

經中對十一相逐一展開。世諦相攝三種:說人相、說分別體相、觀諸法思惟作種種業相。 第一義諦相攝七種,與七種真如對應:無始有為行相第一義諦、相第一義諦(我空、法空)、唯識第一義諦(知有為行唯是心識)、執著第一義諦(苦諦)、邪行第一義諦(集諦)、清淨第一義諦(滅諦)、正修行第一義諦(道諦)。 經中更將七者分三組明其平等無差別:行相、執著、邪行三諦為一切眾生平等;相、唯識二諦為一切法平等;清淨諦為聲聞、緣覺、菩薩菩提平等;正修行諦則「如聞妙法差別,觀奢摩他、毘婆舍那攝取般若波羅蜜平等無差別」。

後續經文對餘相亦有說明:法體相者,「如來出世及不出世,法住、法體、法界」;略廣相者,「略說一句——彼一句、上上句、差別無量句、乃至說應至處」;菩提分法自體相即四念處等,共世間、出世間、遠離染相;得相為「彼法果起世間、出世間功德」;隨順示現相為「依解脫智受用,應知、廣為人說示現」;向障法為「離道相違染法」;隨順彼法相為「彼法多生增長」;過相為「障諸法」;利益相為「隨順彼法功德」。

值得注意的是,本經以音譯「摩得勒伽」稱此門類,未用「本母」「智母」等意譯;且將摩得勒伽直接等同於「了義經」的綱要分類,而非泛稱一切論議。經末文殊師利更請佛「為諸菩薩更重略說修多羅、毘尼、摩得勒伽義,不共一切外道、二乘陀羅尼相」,表明此三門綱要在本經中被定位為菩薩不共法。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》以「摩怛理迦」(又作「摩怛履迦」「摩呾履迦」「摩呾理迦」)為核心術語論述此概念,並譯其義為「本母」。全論將摩怛理迦置於教法分類的樞紐位置,從多個層面加以闡發。

一、三事總攝之一。論謂「三種事,總攝一切諸佛言教」:素怛纜事、毘奈耶事、摩怛履迦事,摩怛理迦與經、律並列為佛陀言教的三大構成。

二、十二分教中「論議」之體。論釋十二分教,以「一切摩呾履迦、阿毘達磨,研究甚深素呾纜義,宣暢一切契經宗要」為論議,並判十二分教歸於三藏:論議即阿毘達磨藏所攝。

三、了義經即摩怛理迦。論明言「一切了義經,皆名摩呾理迦」:凡世尊自廣分別諸法體相之處,及諸聖弟子依自所證無倒分別諸法體相之處,皆名摩呾理迦;此摩呾理迦亦名阿毘達磨。論以譬喻說明:猶如世間書算詩論皆有摩怛理迦,經中循環研覈諸法體相亦復如是;又「如諸字,若無摩呾理迦,即不明了」。契經等十二分教若不建立諸法體相即不明了,建立已即得明了,故摩呾理迦亦名阿毘達磨。

四、本母之喻。論於契經摩呾理迦處明言:「譬如無本母字,義不明了。如是本母所不攝經,其義隱昧,義不明了。與此相違,義即明了,是故說名摩呾理迦」。此以「本母」釋摩怛理迦之功能——為經義提供使之明了的綱要框架。

五、如來言音三種之一。論引解深密法門,謂如來言音略有三種:契經、調伏、本母。其中契經依攝事顯示諸法,分四事、九事、二十九事;調伏依聲聞及菩薩顯示別解脫法。

六、教導三攝。論說教導由三處所攝:藏所攝(聲聞藏及大乘藏)、摩呾理迦所攝(十七地及四種攝)、二所攝(十種教),合名「總略摩呾理迦」。

七、三品摩怛理迦之結構。論於攝事分中分說:素怛纜事摩怛理迦;毘柰耶事摩怛理迦,謂別解脫經所有廣說摩怛理迦,「如來所說、如來所顯、如來所讚」;合二者總略名一摩怛理迦,復為略攝流轉還滅雜染清淨雜說法故,更說「分別法相摩怛理迦」。分別法相摩怛理迦由二相建立:先略序事,後依所略序事廣辯。遍行一切摩怛理迦之相,則於攝釋分中說。

八、菩薩學處之應用。論於菩薩地中,令菩薩「專勵聽聞菩薩素怛纜藏及以解釋,即此菩薩素怛纜藏、摩怛履迦,隨其所聞當勤修學」;又於日日供養三寶中,以「諸菩薩素怛纜藏、摩怛理迦」為正法供養之對象。

綜上,《瑜伽師地論》以摩怛理迦(本母)為貫穿經、律、論三藏的綱要性分類原則,既是了義經的別名,又是使一切經義「明了」的結構性框架,並具體展開為素怛纜摩怛理迦、毘奈耶摩怛理迦、分別法相摩怛理迦三品,構成攝事分的主幹。

顯揚聖教論T1602 · 瑜伽部

《顯揚聖教論》論述此概念時,所用的原文術語主要是「摩怛履迦」,而非題目所標舉的歸一名稱「摩得勒伽」;又稱「摩怛履迦藏」,並明言「摩怛履迦亦名阿毘達磨」及「即此摩怛履迦名阿毘達磨」。這些異名與字形,是本論在多譯名歸一時尤其需要保留的用詞特徵。

本論先從十二分教中的「論議」界定其性質:論議是對一切摩怛履迦、阿毘達磨加以研究,用來解釋諸經義;在經、律、阿毘達磨三藏的配置中,論議歸入阿毘達磨藏。另一處又說,論議即諸經所攝的摩怛履迦;一切了義經中,如來親自廣泛分別諸法體相者,以及已見聖迹的弟子依其自證、無倒顯示諸法體相者,皆可稱為摩怛履迦。

本論以世間書算、詩論皆有「本母」為譬喻,說明摩怛履迦具有綱要與基礎的作用;又如沒有字母,文字便不能顯明,十二分教若不建立諸法體相,法義亦不能明了。建立之後,諸法的自相、共相得以顯現,並能顯示無雜亂的法相。因此,摩怛履迦不是單純的名目彙集,而是以研究法相、建立法體相來使經教明晰的論議形式。依摩怛履迦進一步解釋其餘諸經義者,本論另稱為「鄔波第鑠」。

在說法與釋經的方法上,本論要求依五相隨順解釋一切佛經:略說法要、說等起、釋義、釋難、辨次第。由於摩怛履迦被置於「論議」之中,其功能具體表現在分別總義與別義、辨析差別名與自體相、訓釋名言、開展義門差別,以及解答自設或他設的疑難,呈現出分類、釋名、辨相與次第解說相結合的綱要式論法。

本論又以十一種相總攝佛陀「顯了分別開示諸法」的方式,並名之為「摩怛履迦藏」:世俗諦相、勝義諦相、菩提分法所緣相、此行相、此自體相、得此果相、此領受顯了相、此障礙法相、此隨順法相、此過患相、此稱讚相。其中「此行相」再含觀察諦、建立、過失、功德、理趣、流轉、道理、廣略等八種觀察;「廣略」則是先說一句法,再以無量句展轉分別,直至顯了究竟。由此可見,本論所說摩怛履迦,核心正在依多重範疇建立、分析並充分顯示諸法。

Related