Dharma · AI Companion

闍維

jhāpita

火化佛陀或僧人遗体。AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying (这个概念在说什么)

In contemporary language, cremation is often viewed merely as a hygienic, space-saving method of body disposal—a mechanical end to a biological life. However, in classical Buddhism, the term 闍維 (*Jhāpita*, translated as sacred cremation) represents far more than physical combustion. It is a profound, highly structured, and sacred rite of passage designed for the Buddha, a Wheel-Turning Monarch (*Cakravartin* / 转轮圣王), or individuals of paramount virtue and spiritual nobility.

To understand *Jhāpita*, one must look beyond the flame. It encompasses a complete spiritual and social architecture: meticulous purification, ceremonial wrapping, layering of precious metals and woods, divine intervention, spontaneous ignition, the gathering of sacred relics (*śarīra* / 舍利), and the erection of stupas (*stūpa* / 塔庙) at major crossroads to inspire future generations.

1. The Classical Architecture of *Jhāpita*

According to the *Dīgha Āgama* (《长阿含经》) and *Madhyama Āgama* (《中阿含经》), *Jhāpita* follows a strict, multi-layered procedure—historically termed the "Funeral Rite of a Wheel-Turning Monarch" (转轮圣王葬法):

* Purification and Wrapping: The body is first bathed in fragrant water (香汤). It is then wrapped in new kapok cotton (劫贝) and five hundred successive layers of fine silk or cloth (五百张叠). This is not mere embalming; it is a ritual of profound gratitude and dignity toward the physical vessel that housed wisdom or righteous rule. * Layered Encapsulation: The wrapped body is placed inside a golden coffin (金棺) filled with scented sesame oil (麻油/香油). This golden coffin is then encased in a second, massive iron outer coffin (铁椁), which is further enclosed within a heavy sandalwood outer coffin (栴檀香椁). * The Fragrant Pyre: Over the coffins, an enormous pyre of diverse, precious aromatic woods and incense (香𧂐/香木) is stacked high. * Sacred Ignition and Extinction: *Jhāpita* is not lit by ordinary, vulgar means. In the *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* accounts within the *Dīgha Āgama*, human attempts by local rulers (the Mallas) to light the pyre failed. The fire refused to catch until Mahākāśyapa (大迦叶), the senior disciple, arrived with five hundred monks to pay their final respects. At that moment, the Buddha extended his feet from the coffins in a final marvel, and the pyre ignited spontaneously (*buxiang ziran* / 不烧自燃). Subsequently, to ensure the relics were preserved rather than consumed by the intense heat, a Śāla tree deity (娑罗树神) miraculously extinguished the flames. * Relic Collection and Monument Creation: After the fire dies, the remaining bones and crystalline relics (*śarīra*) are collected and enshrined inside stupas built at four-way intersections (四衢道). Banners and streamers are hung so that travelers, upon seeing the stupa, are moved to contemplate impermanence and virtue, thereby generating immense spiritual merit.

``` [Physical Vessel] ➔ Bathing in Fragrant Water ➔ 500 Layers of Fine Silk │ ▼ [Triple Encapsulation] Golden Coffin (with Scented Oil) ➔ Iron Outer Coffin ➔ Sandalwood Outer Coffin │ ▼ [Sacred Pyre] Stacked Fragrant Woods ➔ Spontaneous Ignition (Wisdom/Devotion) ➔ Deity-Cooled Extinction │ ▼ [Spiritual Legacy] Gathering Śarīra ➔ Erecting Stupas at Crossroads ➔ Inspiring Mindful Contemplation ```

2. Nuances Across Canonical Sources

The early sutra canons handle *Jhāpita* with subtle grammatical and contextual distinctions:

* ***Dīgha Āgama* (T0001)**: Uses *Jhāpita* exclusively as a sacred noun reserved for ultimate spiritual or worldly sovereigns (the Buddha and *Cakravartins*). It emphasizes cosmic harmony—where human intentions yield to divine timing (e.g., devas guiding the cremation location across the Hiraṇyavatī River to the Makuṭa-bandhana / Tianguan Temple / 天冠寺, and delaying the fire for seven days). * ***Madhyama Āgama* (T0026)**: Uses *Jhāpita* also as an active verb (*"积聚而闍維之"* — "to stack fragrant woods and *jhāpita* him"). Furthermore, it extends the protocol to worldly figures of exceptional moral heroism. For example, when King Dīghātu (Long-Life King) was brutally executed and dismembered into seven pieces by a rival king, his loyal son gathered the severed limbs, wrapped the "seven-part body" in new fine silk, built a pyre of all fragrant woods, performed *Jhāpita*, and built an ancestral shrine (庙堂).

3. Essential Boundaries: What *Jhāpita* Is NOT

The translators of the *Madhyama Āgama* were meticulously precise in distinguishing *Jhāpita* from other concepts involving fire:

* ***Jhāpita* vs. Fire Element (*Tejo-dhātu* / 火界)**: Fire Element refers to physical or biological thermal energy. *Internal Fire Element* (内火界) governs body heat and digestion; *External Fire Element* (外火界) refers to natural flames—such as a wildfire that burns villages, forests, and fields, operating blindly without intention and vanishing without mind (*"无受而灭"*). *Jhāpita* is never a blind physical combustion; it is an intentional, ethically saturated ritual of transformation. * ***Jhāpita* vs. Fire Worship (*Aggi-paricariyā* / 事火)**: Fire worship refers to the Vedic ritual of treating fire as a deity to be appeased through sacrifice (a practice Mahākāśyapa’s brothers abandoned upon meeting the Buddha). In *Jhāpita*, fire is not an idol to be worshiped, but an instrument of sacred dissolution.


A Walk-Through in Daily Life (生活里的走查)

To truly grasp *Jhāpita*, we must bring it out of ancient funeral grounds and into the modern human experience. We constantly face the ending of things: the death of a career chapter, the breakup of a relationship, the loss of a loved one, or the ultimate collapse of our physical health.

How do contemporary people handle endings, and where do we misapply this ancient logic? Let us walk through a modern scenario: The dissolution of a long-term life project or relationship.

``` [MODERN DISSOLUTIONS & THE JHĀPITA PROCESS]

UNHEALTHY EXTREME A THE JHĀPITA RITE UNHEALTHY EXTREME B (Vulgar "Wildfire") (Sacred Dissolution) (Toxic "Fire Worship") ────────────────────── ────────────────────── ────────────────────── • Burnout & Cynicism • Honor the Past Vessel • Obsessive Clinging • Sudden ghosting/repulsion • 500 Layers of Silk (Gratitude) • Digital hoarding/stalking • Treating past effort as trash • Fragrant Pyre (Mindfulness) • Idolizing what is gone • Blind destruction • Spontaneous Ignition (Wisdom) • Refusal to let go ```

Step 1: The Wrapping in Fine Silk vs. The Trash Bin

When a major startup fails or a marriage ends, modern culture often swings toward cynical erasure: deleting photos, blocking accounts, and trash-talking the past. This is treating the body of work like medical waste.

* **The *Jhāpita* Mapping**: *Jhāpita* demands that before anything is consumed by fire, it is washed in fragrant water and wrapped in five hundred layers of fine silk and cotton. * In Daily Life: Before you close a company or exit a relationship, you perform a ritual of honor. You acknowledge every effort, every lesson learned, and every hour invested. You wrap the history in respect (*"new fine silk"*), refusing to let it be dragged through the mud.

Step 2: Triple Encapsulation vs. Naked Burnout

Modern individuals often collapse into emotional burnout—letting the crude fires of anxiety and rage burn through their psyche. This is confusing *Jhāpita* with the *External Fire Element* (外火界)—a wildfire that ravages fields and burns itself out chaotically.

* **The *Jhāpita* Mapping**: The body is placed in a golden coffin, sealed in iron, and surrounded by sandalwood. * In Daily Life: You build container spaces for your grief and transition. You don't dump raw heartbreak onto social media algorithms. You hold the core value of what was built inside a "golden coffin" (gratitude for the good), protected by an "iron outer coffin" (firm personal boundaries), enveloped in "sandalwood" (calming, meditative practice).

Step 3: Waiting for the Right Ignition vs. Forced Closure

We often force premature closure. We demand immediate answers, fire off angry late-night emails, or jump straight into a rebound project. In the *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra*, when ordinary people tried to force the torch onto the pyre, it simply would not light.

* **The *Jhāpita* Mapping**: The fire ignited spontaneously only when Mahākāśyapa arrived—representing spiritual maturity, Sangha unity, and full readiness. * In Daily Life: You do not force emotional closure. You wait until clear wisdom and inner presence (*Mahākāśyapa*) arrive. True let-go happens naturally (*"buxiang ziran"*) when deep understanding matures, not when forced by impatience.

Step 4: Stupa at the Crossroads vs. Digital Hoarding

What do we do after something ends? Some try to preserve the dead corpse forever—stalking exes online, endlessly reviewing past emails (a modern form of *Fire Worship* / 事火). Others scatter the ashes into total oblivion.

* **The *Jhāpita* Mapping**: *Jhāpita* concludes with collecting *śarīra* (the indestructible essence of wisdom) and erecting a stupa at a four-way intersection so that all who pass by gain inspiration. * In Daily Life: You extract the essence—the wisdom, the self-knowledge, the compassion gained through trial—and turn it into a beacon. You share your learnings openly to help others navigating similar crossroads. The painful past is transformed into a landmark of guidance.


Why Contemporary People Need It (当代人为什么需要它)

We live in an age characterized by two toxic extremes regarding impermanence: digital immortality hubris and disposable cynicism.

1. The Illusion of Digital Permanence: Algorithms, cloud storage, and AI avatars tempt us to believe we can freeze time. We hoard digital artifacts, archive every text, and seek technological ways to deny the physical reality of death and decay. 2. Disposable Cynicism: Conversely, when things inevitably break, we discard them ruthlessly—swiping away human beings, abandoning commitments at the first sign of friction, and treating human bodies and lives as disposable commodities.

*Jhāpita* offers a radically sane middle path: Sacred Transience.

* It does not deny impermanence—the fire *will* burn the body to ashes. * Yet, it refuses to treat the transient vessel as meaningless trash. It lavishes the body with 500 layers of silk, golden coffins, and sandalwood incense before letting it go.

*Jhāpita* teaches contemporary culture how to grieve with dignity and dissolve without trauma. It demonstrates that the ending of a physical form—whether a biological human, a era, or an institution—is not a tragic mistake of nature, but the ultimate opportunity to crystallize true wisdom (*śarīra*) for the world [8478, 8543].


Common Misreadings and Clarifications (常见误读与澄清)

Misreading 1: "Isn't *Jhāpita* just an ancient Indian word for basic cremation?"

Clarification: No. Basic physical cremation is merely the application of the *External Fire Element* (外火界) to reduce organic material to ash [2642]. *Jhāpita* is an intricate, multi-stage spiritual and ethical liturgy reserved for figures of extreme virtue [3126, 8478]. It requires solemn preparation, triple-casket encapsulation, aromatic pyre assembly, spiritual readiness, relic preservation, and public stupa construction [8478, 8543]. Calling *Jhāpita* "just burning a body" is like calling a sacred coronation "just putting on a hat."

Misreading 2: "Wrapping a body in 500 layers of silk and gold coffins seems like wasteful materialism or attachment."

Clarification: From a shallow viewpoint, lavish caskets seem like attachment to the physical form. But in the Buddhist liberation道 (Path of Liberation), the physical body of an Awakened Being or a righteous ruler was the supreme vessel through which uncounted sentient beings were liberated [8478, 8543]. The 500 layers of silk and iron/gold coffins represent the total devotion (*bhakti*) and gratitude of the community. It is the ultimate expression of non-attachment: honoring the physical vessel to the absolute highest degree, while fully surrendering it to the flame [8547].

Misreading 3: "Is *Jhāpita* related to Vedic Fire Worship (事火)?"

Clarification: Early sutras like the *Madhyama Āgama* explicitly contrast *Jhāpita* with *Aggi-paricariyā* (事火 / Fire Worship) [2854, 3126]. Fire Worship treats fire as a divine personality to be bribed or worshiped for worldly/heavenly rewards [2854]. *Jhāpita* uses fire as an agent of purification and dissolution—a natural, dignified transition from physical form to relics and memory [3126, 8478]. In *Jhāpita*, the focus is never on the fire itself, but on honoring the virtue of the deceased and uplifting the minds of those who remain [8478, 8543].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「闍維」(jhāpita)是佛教中专指对佛陀、转轮圣王或尊贵逝者遗体进行火化(火葬)的庄严丧葬仪轨。该概念不仅指涉物理上的焚烧,更包含了一整套极其繁复、神圣的收敛、备料、焚化、神异示现以及后续收捡舍利、建塔庙供养的完整宗教与社会伦理仪式。

二、主要阐述

根据经典记载,「闍維」的实施具有高度的仪式性,主要围绕其准备仪轨、时间与地点的抉择、过程中的神异示现以及后期的纪念处置展开。

1. 准备仪轨与步骤:闍維的准备工作极其庄严。在《长阿含经》中,佛陀的闍維仪轨等同于「转轮圣王葬法」。具体步骤为:先以香汤洗浴佛身,用新劫贝周匝缠身,再以五百张叠次如缠之;随后将遗体置于金棺内并灌入麻油(或香油),再将金棺置于第二大铁椁中,外层再加重栴檀香椁;最后在上方堆积众名香(或称香𧂐),厚衣其上,方可进行闍維。在《中阿含经》中,对于尊贵逝者(如长寿王)的闍維同样需要「以新繒疊收斂」遗体,并「以一切香、香木積聚」作为火化的薪柴,体现了极高的敬意。 2. 时间与地点的抉择:闍維的举行往往交织着人意与天意。如末罗人最初计划在佛灭度一日后,将佛舍利置于床上,出西城门并在「高显处」进行闍維。然而,诸天意欲留舍利供养七日,并指引将闍維地点设在出城北门、渡过凞连禅河(或尼连禅河)后的「天冠寺」。 3. 过程中的神异示现:在佛陀闍維的过程中,伴随着诸多超越常理的神异事件。当在天冠寺准备就绪后,末罗大臣路夷及大末罗先后执大炬火欲点燃佛积,但火皆不燃。阿那律解释此乃天意,因大迦叶正率五百弟子在赶来的半道上,诸天欲令其在闍維前得以瞻仰佛身。大迦叶赶到后,虽佛身已被重重包裹,但佛陀特从重椁内双出两足示现。在大迦叶绕𧂐三匝并说偈完毕后,佛𧂐「不烧自燃」。由于火势猛烈,末罗们担忧舍利被烧尽,最终由笃信佛道的娑罗树神以神力将火熄灭。 4. 闍維后的后续处置:闍維结束后的核心工作是收捡舍利并建立纪念建筑。在佛陀闍維后,需「收捡舍利」,并在四衢道起立塔庙、表刹悬繒,以使行人见塔思慕,生获福利。而在世俗尊贵人物的闍維后,则需为其「立於廟堂」或「為立廟堂」,以便后人瞻仰与祭奠。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典部类中,「闍維」的表述方式与应用语境存在一定差异:

1. 《长阿含经》(《長阿含經》):本经统一使用「闍維」一词来表述火化过程,且该词专用于指代佛陀及转轮圣王等至高无上者的火葬仪轨,具有极强的神圣性与出世间色彩。 2. 《中阿含经》(《中阿含經》):在本经中,「闍維」不仅作为名词,还常作为动词使用(如「積聚而闍維之」)。此外,其应用对象延伸到了世俗中具有高尚德行的国王(如长寿王),强调即使遗体受损(如被斩作七段),仍需通过新缯叠收敛、香木积聚等步骤完成庄严的闍維仪式。

四、与相关概念的关系

《中阿含经》通过精细的译语,将「闍維」与一般物理意义上的火或外道祭祀之火进行了严格的区分:

1. 闍維与火界:「闍維」专指对人遗体的火化丧葬仪式,具有特定的宗教与社会伦理功能。而「火界」则指物质世界与生理层面的火元素,分为「内火界」(如人体内的热能、消化饮食等)与「外火界」(如自然界中「起已烧村邑、城郭、山林、旷野」并最终「无受而灭」的物理之火)。外火界不具备「闍維」的神圣与敬意色彩。 2. 闍維与事火:「事火」是指事奉、祭祀火神的宗教行为,属于外道祭祀(如迦叶尊者皈依佛陀前曾「事火」)。这是一种以火为崇拜对象的宗教修行,与作为逝者丧葬仪轨的「闍維」有着本质的不同。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《长阿含经》卷四:「阿難!汝欲葬我,先以香湯洗浴其身,以新劫貝周匝纏身,以五百張疊次如纏之。內身金棺,灌以麻油,畢,舉金棺置於第二大鐵槨中,槨外復以重栴檀香槨衣之,於其上積眾名香,厚衣其上,然後闍維。」 2. 《中阿含经》卷十八:「時,長生童子……往至波羅㮈城,語諸貴豪大族:『……汝等可往,以新繒疊收斂長壽王七段屍,以一切香、香木積聚而闍維之,立於廟堂。』」 3. 《中阿含经》卷三十:「云何外火界?若外火起,燒村邑、城郭、山林、曠野,無受而滅。」

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

本部《長阿含經》論及「闍維」(火化佛陀遺體),主要環繞世尊涅槃後的喪葬過程展開。經中首先揭示闍維之法應當效法轉輪聖王葬法,具體步驟詳備如下:先以香湯洗浴其體,以新劫貝周遍纏身,再以五百張疊次如纏之;內身金棺灌以麻油畢,舉金棺置於第二大鐵槨中,栴檀香槨次重於外,積眾名香厚衣其上,然後闍維之;訖收舍利,於四衢道起立塔廟,表剎懸繒。佛陀親口告知阿難此即葬我之法,並強調起塔供養能使行人「思慕如來法王道化,生獲福利,死得上天」。

在實際執行層面,拘尸城諸末羅最初議定一日供養後即送至高顯處闍維之,然因忉利諸天意欲留舍利七日供養,末羅便遵天意延後火化,終於七日後奉牀出城北門,渡凞連禪河,抵天冠寺方行闍維。阿難此時再度向諸末羅轉述轉輪聖王葬法,從香湯浴身到收舍利建塔,儀軌與前文一致。

經中呈現幾項獨特敘事:其一,末羅大臣路夷執炬欲燃佛積而火不燃,阿那律解釋為諸天之意,因大迦葉正率五百弟子從波婆國趕來,欲及未闍維前見佛身;其二,大迦葉抵達後三請阿難欲覲舍利,佛足從重槨內雙出,迦葉禮拜後佛足忽然不現,顯示未闍維前佛身尚有不可思議之相;其三,迦葉繞𧂐三匝說偈已,「彼佛𧂐不燒自燃」,末羅見火焰猛烈恐舍利消盡,幸娑羅樹神以神力滅火。此處「𧂐」即葬具柴堆之專名,為本部獨特用字。火化後,波婆國、遮羅頗國、羅摩伽國、毘留提國、迦維羅衛國、毘舍離國及摩竭王阿闍世等遣使求分舍利,各自起塔供養。

綜觀全經,「闍維」一詞貫穿始終,本經以「𧂐」稱葬具柴堆、以「舍利」稱遺骨,術語自成體系。其論述重心不在闍維之宗教哲理,而在於葬法儀軌的傳承(火化步驟一如轉輪聖王)、天人意旨的介入(延緩火化、令火不燃、𧂐自燃、神力滅火),以及火化後舍利分配的爭請,各國迎歸舍利起塔,凸顯舍利在佛教傳承中之尊崇地位。

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》在此段落中以「闍維」一詞記述遺體火化的具體過程。此段出自長壽王本生故事,雖此經「闍維」概念定位為火化佛陀或僧人遺體,但本段實際所論火化對象為被枉殺的拘娑羅國王長壽,非佛陀亦非僧人,此為此經論及該概念時的獨特側面,須忠實記錄。

一、所採術語:此段經文一律使用「闍維」一詞,全文出現兩次皆作「闍維之」,未見其他異譯形式如「荼毗」「闍毗」「闍鼻」「耶維」等替代用法,術語形式單一而固定。

二、火化對象與背景:經文中「闍維」的對象為拘娑羅國王長壽,而非佛陀或僧人。長壽王被加赦國王梵摩達哆「怨酷枉殺,斬作七段」,故其遺體為「七段屍」,長生童子因此勸波羅㮈城中諸貴豪族前往火化。

三、火化前的準備工作:經文明載火化前需「以新繒疊」收斂遺體,並「以一切香、香木積聚」,顯示此經所記火化流程包含以新布包裹、以香木堆積兩個步驟,且「香」「香木」並列,強調所用為芬芳之木而非普通薪柴。

四、火化後的紀念:火化之後,經文記載「為立廟堂」,即建立祠廟以紀念亡者,使火化不僅是處理遺體的方式,也成為立廟紀念的前置程序,呈現出火化、立廟一體的禮俗結構。

五、發起火化者:火化並非由國王家屬獨力完成,而是由長生童子勸請波羅㮈城中諸貴豪族共同執行,「波羅㮈諸貴豪族為長生童子所勸」方才進行收斂、火化、立廟堂及修書等事宜,顯示此處火化帶有集體發起、共同致意的性質,且與致書敵國的政治抗議行動並舉。

六、此經未明言火化所用具體火源、儀軌程序或主事僧團,僅以「以一切香、香木積聚而闍維之」一句概括,記述相當簡略。

七、語法結構:經文使用「闍維」時作「積聚而闍維之」,「之」代指所收斂之七段屍體,動詞「闍維」以承接前文「積聚」的方式呈現,未另標明主事執行者之名號。

景德傳燈錄T2076 · 史傳部

《景德傳燈錄》是一部禪宗史傳著作,記錄從過去七佛至宋代諸禪師的傳承事蹟。書中對「闍維」——即火化佛陀或僧人遺體——的論述呈現出豐富的面相,主要可歸納如下:

一、術語並用:闍維、茶毘、荼毘互通

本書對火化一事並未統一用詞,三種譯名交互使用。「闍維」一詞直接出現多次,如「眾以香油旃檀闍維真體」、「闍維收舍利四十九粒」、「闍維建塔于本山」等。而「茶毘」與「荼毘」亦極為常見,如「佛已茶毘」、「國主厚禮茶毘。收舍利三百餘粒并靈骨」、「荼毘收靈骨于院之後山建浮圖」等。三者音義相同,皆指以火焚化遺體之事。

二、火化方式:凡火與三昧火之別

書中記載的火化方式可分為二類。其一為凡俗之火,以香薪、香油、旃檀等為燃料,由弟子或大眾執行,如「時諸弟子即以香薪競茶毘之」、「眾以香油旃檀闍維真體」。其二為三昧神火,由修行者自身以神通力化火自焚,如「入師子奮迅三昧……化火自焚」、「作十八變火光三昧用焚其身」、「踊身虛空作十八變火光三昧自焚其軀」、「即現神變化火焚身」、「化三昧火自焚。平地舍利可高一尺」等。此類自焚往往伴隨踊身虛空、現十八變等神異瑞相。

三、火化結果:舍利、靈骨與建塔

火化之後,書中幾乎無一例外地提到「收舍利」與「建塔」(或「浮圖」)供養,如「收舍利建塔于那爛陀寺」、「收舍利建浮圖」。舍利有「五色舍利」、「靈骨」等多種稱謂,數量亦有差異,如「得五色舍利三百粒」、「闍維收舍利四十九粒」、「收舍利三百餘粒并靈骨」、「茶毘獲舍利不可勝計」。另有特例:舍利被「散於林野」而非起塔;亦有火化後「舌不壞,柔軟如紅蓮葉」之瑞相。

四、特殊情節:肉身不壞與示異

書中亦記載火化前後的特殊情狀。如有僧人倒立示化後,弟子將遺體舁往荼毘時「屹然不動」,經其出家之妹以手推之方倒,「僨然而踣遂就闍維」。又如三祖璨大師葬處,唐李常謫為舒州別駕後啟壙取真儀而闍維之,「得五色舍利三百粒」;亦有入塔經二稔後發塔,發現全身儼然、髮爪俱長,再於城東闍維之事。

五、執行者:弟子、王臣、地方官

火化的執行者因身分而異。一般由門人弟子主持,如「門人闍維收舍利建塔」;地位崇高者則由國主遣使厚禮荼毘,如「國主厚禮茶毘。收舍利三百餘粒并靈骨」;亦有地方官員襄助之事,如前述李常啟壙闍維。

綜觀全書,《景德傳燈錄》對「闍維」一事的記述,重點不在義理闡釋,而在於其事蹟的紀實:透過火化方式、所得舍利、瑞相與執行者等側面,凸顯禪宗祖師示寂之莊嚴與不可思議。此一史傳性質的記載,為後世瞭解禪宗喪儀與舍利信仰提供了豐富的文獻基礎。

Related