Dharma · AI Companion

威儀

īryāpatha

行住坐卧中合乎律仪的举止。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么

In Buddhist practice, Dignified Manner (威儀, Sanskrit: *īryāpatha*) is often misunderstood as mere external etiquette or rigid religious protocol. In the classical canonical tradition, however, it is the natural physical manifestation of an inward restraint of the senses (*guarding the sense doors*, 防護諸根) and the integration of mind and body (*gathering body, speech, and mind*, 攝持身口意).

*Īryāpatha* literally refers to the "paths of movement" or bodily postures. The Buddhist scriptures systematize human daily life into the Four Postures (四威儀): walking, standing, sitting, and lying down (*caṅkrama*, *sthāna*, *niṣaṇṇa*, *śayana*). In specific specialized practices, practitioners may engage in Three Postures (三種威儀)—focusing solely on walking, standing, and sitting while abstaining from lying down (*常坐不臥*)—or even undertake ascetic postures (*不可稱計威儀禮節*, such as sleeping on thorns or rough ground) to test and temper their mental equanimity.

1. The Classical Terms and Inner Mechanics

In early texts like the *Madhyama Āgama* (*中阿含經*) and *Saṃyukta Āgama* (*雜阿含經*), *īryāpatha* appears in various descriptive formulations: * Dignified Law / Norms (威儀法): The systematic protocols of body and mind during routine activities—stretching, bending, wearing robes, holding the alms bowl, eating, talking, or remaining silent—conducted with clear awareness (*正知*, *samprajañña*). * Dignified Appearance / Posture (威儀色 / 調伏色): The observable, harmonious physical presence of one whose internal passions and restlessness have been tamed (*dama*, 調伏). * Dignified Etiquette (威儀禮節): The social dimension of posture, where inner humility and respect for others translate into graceful, considerate interpersonal behavior. * Lack of Dignified Manner (不攝威儀): The state where a practitioner abandons sensory guarding, leading to frivolous speech, continuous distraction (*終日散亂*), inability to attain concentration (*心不得定*), and letting the six senses run wild across external objects (*馳騁六境*).

2. The Prerequisite and the Liberation Sequence

*Īryāpatha* does not arise from forced performance or vain self-display. The Agamas explicitly establish its indispensable prerequisites: 1. Inner Reverence and Humility: One must harbor deep respect (*恭敬住*), mindfulness (*繫心*), moral vigilance/awe (*畏慎*), and deference toward the virtues of fellow practitioners (*隨順他德*). Without these inward qualities, true *īryāpatha* cannot be fulfilled. 2. The Social Contrast: The *Saṃyukta Āgama* illustrates this through Sakra (天帝釋) and the Asura King visiting sages. Sakra stripped off his five royal ornaments, greeted the sages warmly with humility, and was praised for possessing the "true Dignified Manner." In contrast, the Asura King stripped off his ornaments but strutted in, looking around haughtily without greeting anyone; he was denounced as showing an "untamed posture" (*不調伏色*) and lacking true *īryāpatha*.

Crucially, *īryāpatha* occupies the foundational starting point in the path to ultimate liberation (*Nirvāṇa*):

$$\text{Reverence/Mindfulness} \longrightarrow \text{Dignified Manner (威儀具足)} \longrightarrow \text{Fulfillment of Training (學法具足)} \longrightarrow \text{Fivefold Dharma-Body (五分法身)} \longrightarrow \text{Nirvāṇa (無餘涅槃)}$$

Without *īryāpatha*, the Fivefold Dharma-Body—comprising Precepts (*戒身*, *śīla*), Concentration (*定身*, *samādhi*), Wisdom (*慧身*, *prajñā*), Liberation (*解脫身*, *vimukti*), and Knowledge and Vision of Liberation (*解脫知見身*, *vimukti-jñāna-darśana*)—cannot take root. Thus, maintaining dignified conduct while begging or interacting with society is esteemed in the texts as a supreme treasure of practice.

3. The Paradigm of the Awakened Ones

The Buddha and Bodhisattvas embody Inconceivable Dignified Manner (不可思議威儀). The *Madhyama Āgama* details the Buddha’s daily exemplar: * Walking: He walks neither slouched nor excessively erect, stepping right foot first with calm, unhurried strides; his ankles never strike each other, his gaze is steadily focused ahead, and when looking around, his whole body turns gracefully like a dragon (*身極右旋,觀察如龍*). * Sitting: He sits with composure, without strain or fidgeting, free from both agitation and worldly exuberance. * Eating: He accepts food attentively, chews quietly without leaving food remnants or taking oversized bites, maintaining unbroken awareness throughout.

In Mahāyāna texts like the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*大寶積經*), this serene composure (*威儀庠序諸根寂定,心意恬怕*) serves an essential compassionate function: by adapting their deportment to suit different beings (men, women, elders, youth), Bodhisattvas inspire joy, quiet the wild thoughts of onlookers (*觀無妄想*), and guide sentient beings toward the Awakening Mind (*Bodhicitta*).


生活里的走查

To understand how *īryāpatha* operates, let us walk through a typical modern day, contrasting common missteps with authentic practice.

``` [ Modern Daily Scenario ] │ ┌────────────┴────────────┐ ▼ ▼ 【Scattered Mode】 【Īryāpatha Practice】 (Unguarded Senses) (Inner Guarding & Clear Awareness) │ │ ├─ Rush & Scroll ├─ Grounded Strides ├─ Slouch & Fidget ├─ Upright & Relaxed └─ Irritable Reaction └─ Mindful & Compassionate Engagement ```

Scenario 1: The Morning Commute & Smartphone Scrolling

* Common Misstep: You walk onto the subway while staring at a smartphone screen, bumping into fellow commuters, slouching in your seat, and endlessly refreshing social media feeds. Mentally, you are agitated; physically, your body is tense and disjointed. You might think, *"I am just resting my mind."* * **Mapping to *Īryāpatha*: This is precisely what the scriptures term "Not guarding dignified manner"** (*不攝威儀*)—letting the six senses race across external objects (*馳騁六境*), leaving the mind scattered and ungrounded (*心不得定*). * True Practice: Walking with clear awareness (*正知出入*). Feeling the feet touch the pavement, keeping the upper body naturally upright without stiffness, observing surroundings with composure (*觀察如龍*), and recognizing sensations without getting swept away by digital stimuli.

Scenario 2: High-Stress Overtime & Work Meetings

* Common Misstep: Sitting slumped over a desk, bouncing your leg anxiously, biting your fingernails, or speaking brusquely in a Zoom meeting out of impatience. * **Mapping to *Īryāpatha***: People often mistake *īryāpatha* for military-style stiffness or artificial politeness. In reality, physical fidgeting reflects internal restlessness (*散亂*). Bouncing legs or sharp tone are the physical leaks of an untamed mind (*不調伏色*). * True Practice: Sitting squarely (*正床而坐*) with a straight yet relaxed spine. In meetings, engaging with others with genuine listening and humility (*面相問訊慰勞*, *恭敬住*) rather than defensive posturing or dismissive eye-rolls (the Asura King’s mistake).

Scenario 3: Dining and Socializing

* Common Misstep: Eating absentmindedly while watching TV, wolfing down food without tasting it, or interrupting family members at dinner to check work emails. * **Mapping to *Īryāpatha***: The Agamas explicitly highlight eating etiquette as a core arena of *īryāpatha*: taking moderate portions (*受水受食適量*), chewing thoroughly without rush, and giving full attention to the meal and the people present. * True Practice: Eating with mindfulness and gratitude (*食知足*), bringing stability to the body, and displaying warmth and respect toward partner and children.


当代人为什么需要它

Modern life is characterized by an unprecedented fragmentation of attention and a profound disconnection between mind and body.

1. Reconnecting the Body-Mind Split: High-speed digital environments tempt us to live almost entirely "in our heads" or "in the cloud," treating the physical body as merely a vehicle to carry a brain to the next video call. *Īryāpatha* anchors the mind back into physical reality through the four basic postures—walking, standing, sitting, lying down. 2. A Ground-Level Entry Point to Meditation: Many modern people feel frustrated by formal sitting meditation, complaining that their minds are too noisy. *Īryāpatha* demystifies practice by revealing that the path to liberation does not begin with complex absorption states (*dhyāna*), but with simple physical mindfulness in daily movement. 3. Insights from Cognitive Science & Neuroscience: Modern embodied cognition and polyvagal theory demonstrate that body posture directly modulates the autonomic nervous system and emotional states. Slouched posture and rapid, fragmented eye movements heighten sympathetic fight-or-flight arousal, whereas an upright, relaxed posture with smooth gaze stabilizes heart rate variability and mental focus. * *Limit & Distinction*: While neuroscience explains the physiological feedback loops between posture and brain states, Buddhist *īryāpatha* goes further. It treats physical composure not merely as a self-regulation tool for stress reduction, but as a moral and spiritual discipline (*śīla*) that guards against defilements and matures into transcendental insight (*prajñā*).


常见误读与澄清

誤讀一:威儀就是「僵硬的戒律」或「外在的演戲」

* 澄清:许多人误以为威仪是像训练仪仗队那样,把身体僵硬地扣在某种固定姿势里,或者是为了给别人看而做出的矫揉造作。 * 真相:Classical scriptures emphasize that external dignity must flow from internal restraint and reverence (*由內而外*). Forced stiffness creates physical tension and mental resistance, which is itself a form of aversion. True *īryāpatha* is "tranquil and at ease" (*諸根寂定,心意恬怕*), yielding a demeanor that is both natural and deeply grounded.

誤讀二:威儀只是僧團的專利,在家居士不需要

* 澄清:认为「行住坐卧皆有规范」是比丘或出家人的事,在家人生活中顺其自然、怎么舒服怎么来即可。 * 真相:The *Saṃyukta Āgama* explicitly addresses householders regarding "What Precepts and What Dignified Manner" (*何戒何威儀*), defining it as "guarding body, speech, and mind, refraining from the three evil deeds, and practicing generosity" (*攝持身口意,不造三惡法,行信惠財法施*). Whether ordained or lay, anyone seeking mental clarity needs *īryāpatha* to prevent daily life from eroding their mindfulness.

誤讀三:威儀等于苦行或壓抑感官

* 澄清:把威仪混同于忍受痛苦,以为越折磨身体就越有威仪。 * 真相:While Bodhisattvas may manifest varied ascetic practices (*不可稱計威儀禮節*) under specific historical conditions for pedagogical reasons, the core definition of *īryāpatha* across all Āgamas centers on clear awareness (*正知*) and sense-restraint (*護諸根*). The Buddha explicitly rejected extreme, painful self-mortification that agitates the mind, favoring a demeanor that is relaxed, upright, and conducive to peace (*心境安寧*).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「威儀」(梵語:īryāpatha)是佛教修行体系中的核心概念,指修行者在日常行止中所展现的庄严、调伏与得体的仪态。它不仅涵盖了「行、住、坐、臥」等身体姿态的规范,还包括了衣着、饮食、社交礼仪等外在行为准则。在佛教经典中,威仪并非单纯的外在约束,而是内在防护诸根、摄持身口意的自然显现。它是比丘修行的基石,是圣者人格的直观体现,更是通往最终解脱(涅槃)的起点与根本保障。

二、主要阐述

1. 日常行止的规范与正知

威仪的核心在于日常行持中的高度自律与正知。根据经典论述,比丘在「行住坐臥、眠寤語默」等一切时处,皆须保持正知,做到「儀容庠序」。具体而言,修行者应当善于观察分辨,在屈伸低仰、穿着僧伽梨及持拿衣钵时,都保持高度的正念。反之,若比丘「不攝威儀」,则会表现为「言語嬉戲,終日散亂,心不得定,縱諸根門,馳騁六境」。这表明,威仪的流失直接源于内心的散乱,而真正的威仪必须建立在防范感官放任的基础之上。

2. 社交礼仪与调伏之相

威仪在人际交往中体现为一种调伏、和蔼且尊重他人的得体举止。经典通过天帝释与阿修罗王拜访仙人的对比,生动地阐明了这一点:天帝释在进入仙人住处时,除去五种装饰,并与仙人们「面相問訊慰勞」,这种谦逊、调伏的举止被赞叹为「善好真實威儀法」;而阿修罗王虽同样除去装饰,但入内后「周向看視,不顧眄諸仙人,亦不問訊」,这种傲慢无礼的行为则被斥为「不調伏色」与「非威儀法」。此外,对于居家修行者,威仪同样体现为「攝持身口意,不造三惡法」,并广行「信惠財法施」的社会责任与善行。

3. 佛菩萨的超然威仪与化度功能

佛陀与菩萨的威仪是超凡且不可限量的。如来成就了「不可思議威儀」,佛的威仪被赞叹为「無底」,菩萨的威仪亦「不可限量」。这种威仪在日常中表现为「威儀庠序諸根寂定,心意恬怕」,呈现出极高的「威相莊嚴」,令见者自然发起欢喜与恭敬。

更重要的是,威仪是度化众生的重要方便。菩萨通过「謹慎身行威儀禮節」来开化众生,并能随顺男女、老幼、尊卑等不同众生的根机,示现相应的威仪礼节以作引导。众生若能效仿菩萨的「舉動進止威儀禮節」进行修行,便能得到度脱;若能瞻仰菩萨的威仪,则能达到「觀無妄想」的境界。顺从佛之威仪的众生,亦能获得大利并激发菩提心。

4. 特定情境下的威仪实践

* 佛陀的日常典范:佛陀的威仪体现在行、住、坐、食的每一个细节中。行走时身体「終不低身」亦「不低仰」,先举右足,步伐不乱,两踝不碰,观察时「身極右旋,觀察如龍」;坐时回身右旋,正床而坐,心境安宁;饮食时受水受食适量,抟食齐整,口有余食不内后抟。 * 苦行中的威仪示现:菩萨示现的种种苦行(如卧荆棘、卧土、食果、弊衣、裸形、常坐不卧等)亦被纳入「不可稱計威儀禮節」的范畴。 * 特定威仪的专修:如福焰王子在特定时期「唯住三種威儀而住」,即「若行若住若坐,而不眠臥」,在四威仪中专修前三者。 * 礼敬仪轨:如尊者摩诃迦叶在请法时,「從座而起正持威儀,偏袒右臂右膝著地,合掌恭敬」,展示了「正持威儀」的具体规范。 * 独处比丘的要求:独处无事的比丘更应在不憍慠、少言说、护诸根、食知足、精进、正念正智及知时等方面严格要求自己,以维护威仪,避免在众中举止失当而招致同修的诃责。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典和译本中,「威仪」这一概念的术语呈现出丰富的多样性: * 《中阿含經》:多使用「威儀法」与「成就威儀」等词,侧重于比丘日常行止的规范性。 * 《雜阿含經》:除了使用「威儀法」外,还使用了「威儀色」来描绘得体的仪态;以「不攝威儀」指代放逸散乱的状态;并以「威儀足」与「威儀具足」表述威仪的圆满成就。 * 《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志译):最常与「威仪」并提的复合术语是「威儀禮節」。此外,该经还使用了「菩薩威儀」、「佛威儀」、「不可思議威儀」、「威儀庠序」、「威相莊嚴」、「定威儀境界」、「三種威儀」以及「正持威儀」等丰富的术语形式,用以描绘佛菩萨及修行者的举止风范。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与恭敬、畏慎、随顺的关系(前提条件)

威仪并非凭空产生,其前提是修行者内在的敬畏与谦逊。在《中阿含经》中,具足威仪的前提是比丘必须「行恭敬及善觀,敬重諸梵行人」。在《杂阿含经》中,比丘若要令「威儀具足」,必须做到「恭敬住」、「常當繫心」、「常當畏慎」,并「隨他德力(或隨他自在)諸修梵行上、中、下座」。若无这些内在的敬畏与随顺,则绝无可能具足威仪。

2. 与学法、五分法身及涅槃的关系(修行阶次)

威仪在迈向最终解脱的修行序列中处于关键的起点位置。经典建立了一套严密的递进关系: * 《中阿含经》指出:具足威仪法后,方能具足学法;具学法后,方能具足戒身、定身、慧身、解脱身、解脱知见身(五分法身),最终证得涅槃。另一处则表述为:具威仪和学法是后续护诸根、护戒、乃至见如实、知如真、解脱涅槃的必经之路。 * 《杂阿含经》同样强调:以「恭敬、繫心、畏慎、隨順他德」为起点,才能「威儀具足」;「威儀具足」后,方能「學法具足」;「學法具足」后,才能令「戒身、定身、慧身、解脫身、解脫知見身」具足,最终证得「無餘涅槃」。 反之,若不具足威仪,则后续的学法、持戒、禅定、智慧乃至解脱皆无从谈起。

3. 与持戒的关系

威仪与持戒紧密相连。比丘「持戒妙法,成就威儀,入家受食」被尊为修行中的「至要」,其价值远超世俗利益。在居家修行中,回答「何戒何威儀」时,同样指向了身口意的防范与善行。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于威仪的日常内涵: 「正知出入,善觀分別,屈伸低仰,儀容庠序,善著僧伽梨及諸衣鉢,行住坐臥、眠寤語默,皆正知之。」——《中阿含經》

2. 关于社交中的威仪法: 「天帝釋除去五種莊飾,往詣諸仙人所,面相問訊慰勞……仙人讚言:『善好真實威儀法。』」——《雜阿含經》

3. 关于菩萨威仪的化度作用: 「菩薩摩訶薩謹慎身行威儀禮節,開化眾生。隨其所應而為示現,或現男子、或現女人、或現嬰孩、或現長老、或現少小、或現尊卑,隨其所樂示現威儀禮節。」——《大寶積經》

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經論述「威儀」概念,主要見於三段原文,可歸納為以下數端:

一、威儀法作為趣向涅槃的階梯初階 經中以連鎖推論方式,將「威儀法」置於修證次第的最初階段。佛陀告誡比丘:當行恭敬及善觀,敬重諸梵行人。若不行恭敬、不善觀、不敬重諸梵行,則「具威儀法者,必無是處」;不具威儀法,則具學法、具戒身、具定身、具慧身、具解脫身、具解脫知見身、具涅槃者,皆必無是處。反之,行恭敬善觀者,則此八項「必有是處」。此處經文以「威儀法」為術語,與「學法」、「戒身」、「定身」、「慧身」、「解脫身」、「解脫知見身」並列,構成由外而內、由戒定慧至解脫涅槃的完整次第。

二、同樣次第的擴展表述 另一段經文同樣以恭敬善觀為前提,以「具威儀法者,必有是處」起首,但其後次第詳略有異:威儀法→學法→護諸根、護戒、不悔、歡悅、喜、止、樂、定、見如實、知如真、厭、無欲、解脫→涅槃。此處以更為細密的修證項目替代了前述簡略的「戒身、定身、慧身、解脫身」名目,顯示本經在表述同一觀念時,存在詳略兩種版本,且皆以「威儀法」起首、以涅槃為終。

三、「成就威儀」的實踐價值 在敘事性段落中,諸比丘曾共論:居士在家,是「比丘等持戒妙法,成就威儀,入家受食」為勝,還是「朝朝益利百千萬倍」為勝。結論以為:成就威儀、入家受食勝過世間財利,且「設復過是,唯此至要」。尊者阿那律陀並以自身昔日為貧窮捃拾者時,自闕己食分予辟支佛無患的故事,證成此說。

四、術語歸納 本經論及此概念時,主要使用兩個用語形式:「威儀法」(用於修證次第的技術性表達,與學法、戒身等並列)和「成就威儀」(用於敘事中描述比丘的具體行持,與「持戒妙法」、「入家受食」並舉)。兩個用語皆以「威儀」為核心詞,未見以其他異名替代的情況。「威儀」在本經中既指外在行住坐臥合乎律儀的舉止,亦與持戒共為比丘清淨生活的標幟。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對「威儀」的論述,可從以下幾個方面加以歸納。

一、威儀作為外顯行為的莊嚴。在毘摩質多羅阿修羅王與天帝釋同訪仙人的敘事中,威儀被用來描述王者除去五飾、入園時的舉止。阿修羅王「入於門內,周向看視,不顧眄諸仙人,亦不問訊」,仙人評為「不似人形,非威儀法,似田舍兒,非長者子」;反觀天帝釋「與諸仙人面相問訊慰勞,然後還出」,則被讚為「有可適人色,有威儀色,非田舍兒,似族姓子」、「善好真實威儀法」。可見威儀在本經中具體落實於對同修、長者的問訊、顧眄、慰勞等禮敬儀節,是內在敬意的外顯。

二、威儀與戒、行的並列。經中以偈頌提問:「何戒何威儀?何得何為業?慧者云何住?云何往生天?」,將「戒」與「威儀」並列為修行的兩大面向。又另一偈云:「若得諸法數,若復種種學,具威儀及行,為我分別說。」,以「威儀」與「行」並稱,足見本經將威儀視為與持戒、修行並列的獨立維度。

三、威儀具足作為修道的階梯。世尊教誡比丘:若有比丘「不恭敬住,不繫心,不畏慎,不隨他自在諸修梵行上、中、下座」,則「欲令威儀足者,無有是處」;反之,「當勤恭敬、繫心、畏慎,隨他德力諸修梵行上、中、下座,而威儀具足者,斯有是處」。本經以連鎖因果顯示:威儀具足 → 學法具足 → 戒身、定身、慧身、解脫身、解脫知見身具足 → 得無餘涅槃。此處以「威儀足」、「威儀具足」、「威儀滿足」等術語,反覆強調威儀並非孤立的禮節,而是貫穿戒定慧、解脫知見乃至究竟涅槃的修行起點。

四、不攝威儀的過患。對諸比丘「言語嬉戲,終日散亂,心不得定,縱諸根門,馳騁六境」的狀況,住林天神批評其「不攝威儀」。本經以此表明,威儀的失墜伴隨心之散亂與根門馳騁,兩者互為表裡。

綜觀《雜阿含經》對威儀的論述,其術語以「威儀」、「威儀法」、「威儀足/具足/滿足」、「攝威儀」等形式出現,未見別譯名;其內涵兼攝外現的禮敬問訊儀節與內在的恭敬攝心之定學,並安置於由戒而行、至定慧解脫的整個修道階序之中。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「威儀」,主要從外在行止與持戒的關係著眼,用以判別真實比丘與形似比丘之差別。

一、威儀的具體內涵與範圍

該經將「威儀」與「禮節」並舉為「威儀禮節」,並透過具體身體動作來界定其內容。其涵蓋的舉止包括:行步進止(行走與停住)、屈伸低仰(彎腰、伸展、低頭、抬首)、執持衣鉢(拿持袈裟與鉢)、出入行來(出門與入室的往來)、視瞻(目光瞻視)、看視(觀看)等日常生活中的一切身姿動作。換言之,凡比丘行住坐臥四威儀中所展現的身相,皆屬威儀禮節所攝。

二、威儀與戒律的密切關聯

此經反覆將「威儀」與「戒律」、「禁戒」並列,視二者為一體之兩面。在七法喻中,說比丘成就七法弊魔波旬不得其便,第一法即「戒律成就,威儀具足,犯小律尚畏,何況大者」,將威儀具足視為戒律成就的具體表現,且以對小過犯亦懷畏懼之心來護持。又說「持戒禁限」之比丘,能「出入行步不失時節,看視不失威儀」,顯示持戒落實於行止之中。經中亦勸諸比丘當「修行威儀,所說如法」,將修習威儀列為日常應學之事。

三、威儀作為真偽比丘的判別標準

該經以「似驢者」之喻,指出形似沙門而根敗之人,「無有威儀禮節之宜,行步進止,屈伸低仰,執持衣鉢,都違禁戒」,為梵行人所譏彈。在「四果」之喻中:

- 「生而似生」之人:不持禁戒,不知行步禮節,不知出入行來,不知著衣持鉢,諸根錯亂,犯禁戒不行正法,是根敗之人; - 「熟而像生」之人:雖視瞻不端、不隨法行、喜左右顧視,然能「精進多聞,修行善法,恒持戒律,不失威儀」,見少非法便懷恐懼; - 「熟而似熟」之人:持戒禁限,出入行步不失時節,看視不失威儀,極精進修行善法,「威儀禮節皆悉成就」,見小非法便懷恐怖,況復大者。

此經以威儀之具足與否,區分形似沙門之凡夫與真實持戒之比丘,並勸當學熟果之人。

四、術語特點

此經論威儀常以「威儀禮節」連用,強調禮節與威儀不可分割;並以「行步」「出入」「視瞻」「看視」「執持衣鉢」等具體行住坐臥之詞描述,貼近日常身相,與側重內心調柔或禪定成就的論述有所不同。

Related