Dharma · AI Companion

無學正見

aśaikṣa-samyagdṛṣṭi

无学圣者圆满无漏的正见。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

In the traditional Buddhist map of the path to liberation, the unlearned right view (無學正見, aśaikṣa-samyagdṛṣṭi, "right view of one beyond training") occupies an extremely special and exalted position. To understand it, one must first clarify what "learning" (學) and "beyond learning" (無學) mean.

A "learner" (有學, śaikṣa) refers to a practitioner who has already stepped onto the stream of the noble ones (from the first fruit, the stream-enterer 須陀洹, srotāpanna, to the third fruit, the non-returner 阿那含, anāgāmin) but whose training is not yet complete and who still has defilements to eradicate. A "one beyond learning" (無學人, aśaikṣa) refers to one whose training has been utterly completed, who has no defilements left to sever, and who no longer needs to counteract defilements through "cultivation" — the ultimately liberated one, namely the arhat (阿羅漢, arhat; also 阿羅訶).

Therefore, the unlearned right view is not a "technique to be practiced for contemplation," but rather the ultimate, outflow-free (無漏, anāsrava), supramundane (出世間, lokottara) right view accomplished by an arhat after exhausting all fundamental defilements. It stands at the head of the ten dharmas of one beyond training (十無學法: unlearned right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration, right liberation, right knowledge), signifying that the mind has completely departed from defilement and blindness.

The classical canon draws an extremely strict hierarchical distinction among types of right view, never conflating them: 1. Worldly, outflowing right view (世俗有漏正見): "Worldly, conventional, with outflows, with grasping, turning toward a good destiny" (世、俗,有漏、有取,转向善趣). This includes believing in cause and effect, believing in karmic retribution, and performing good deeds to accumulate merit. Although such right view can bring favorable worldly results (turning toward a good destiny), it still carries attachment to "self" and "objects" (有取), and has not departed from the root of saṃsāra and suffering. 2. Noble, supramundane, outflow-free right view (聖出世間無漏正見): "Noble, supramundane, without outflows, without grasping, rightly exhausting suffering, turning toward the edge of suffering" (圣、出世间,无漏、不取,正尽苦,转向苦边). This is precisely the essence of the unlearned right view. It is the noble disciple's profound contemplation of the Four Noble Truths (四聖諦, catvāri ārya-satyāni) — suffering, origin, cessation, path — in conjunction with "outflow-free thought" (無漏思惟), and with "skillful wisdom" (巧便𭶑慧) observing as they truly are the nature of the six internal and external sense bases (六入處, ṣaḍ-āyatana: eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind; form, sound, smell, taste, touch, mental objects) and the five aggregates (五蘊, pañca-skandha: form, feeling, perception, volition, consciousness) [7816].

The canon offers an extremely precise simile for the sage who has accomplished the unlearned right view — the "pure fine horse" (清淨良馬): Just as a fine horse, after being repeatedly trained by a skilled horse-tamer, finally becomes the king's "unsurpassable" (無上调) mount, so too does a worthy wise person who has accomplished the unlearned right view undergo the complete taming of the mind, reaching the "unsurpassable calm, the foremost calm" (無上止、第一止) [4610]. This wisdom can "remove all crookedness (flattery and distortion), remove all defilement (afflictive pollution), remove all fear (fear of birth and death), remove all delusion (ignorance and stupidity), remove all flattery, still all dust, purify all stains, and cling to nothing" (除一切曲、除一切秽、除一切怖、除一切痴、除一切谄,止一切尘,净一切垢而无所著) [4610].

When the unlearned right view is fully manifested, the sage gives rise to the self-certifying declaration of liberation (the famous four-line verse): "My birth is exhausted, the holy life is established, what had to be done has been done (accomplished), and I know for myself that there will be no further existence (no more taking on of existence)." (我生已尽,梵行已立,所作已作(已办),自知不受后有(不更受有)。) [4457, 10528] This means: the driving force of rebirth (birth) has been utterly extinguished; the immaculate holy life (梵行, brahmacarya) has been established; everything that needed to be done (cutting off the origin of suffering, realizing the cessation of suffering) has been fully accomplished; and the self clearly knows it will not fall again into the bondage of another life (no further existence).


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

So that the "unlearned right view" does not remain an unapproachable abstraction, we can walk through the differences in mental response among an ordinary person, a cultivating practitioner (a learner, 有學), and one who possesses the unlearned right view (one beyond learning, 無學), through the most familiar contemporary scenarios (for example: a crisis erupting in a work group chat, social-media algorithms steering attention, an argument in an intimate relationship).

Scenario One: Receiving a harsh interrogation from a manager in the work group chat late at night

* The ordinary person's mental chain (covered by the five hindrances and ignorance): * Form aggregate (色蘊, physical and environmental): The phone screen lights up, the blue light is harsh, the heart suddenly races, the stomach tightens. * Feeling aggregate (受蘊, sensation): An extremely unpleasant, anxious, fearful "painful feeling" (苦受) arises in an instant. * Perception aggregate (想蘊, apprehending marks and labels): Immediately seizes on keywords in the message and labels them: "He's targeting me," "He's shifting the blame again," "This is so unfair." * Volition aggregate (行蘊, volitional activity): The will begins to churn violently (greed, aversion, delusion flare up), typing a rebuttal, or suppressing anger and lying sleepless all night, rehearsing dozens of quarrel scripts in the mind. * Consciousness aggregate (識蘊, coordination and discernment): The entire consciousness is occupied by a "victimized self," framing the whole event as "my career crisis." * The learner's (有學, cultivating right view) mental chain: * Aware that painful feeling and hatred have arisen, attempting to apply the four establishments of mindfulness (四念處, smṛtyupasthāna) or contemplation of impermanence (觀照無常) to counteract them. Though anger can be suppressed (cutting off the five hindrances), deep inside there remains a subtle self: "I am suffering, I am enduring humiliation." * The adept sage's (無學聖者, unlearned right view) mental chain: * Seeing as it is: When the text (form/mental object among the six external sense bases) enters through the eyes and the mind faculty (internal sense bases), the unlearned right view, with "skillful wisdom" (巧便𭶑慧), instantly penetrates: this is nothing but a brief aggregation of written symbols (form), neural signals (feeling), brain interpretation (perception), mental reactions (volition), and conscious awareness (consciousness). * No leakage of the mind arises: There is no fixed "I" being scolded, nor any truly fixed "crisis" occurring. The five aggregates are all empty; the six internal and external sense bases are all impermanent, suffering, empty, and not-self. The mind is like pure water unstained by dust, giving rise to not the slightest subtle greed, aversion, or delusion (exhausting all outflows, 盡諸有漏). * Conventional expression with equanimity: The sage can still clearly reply to work messages, or even verbally handle the crisis by saying "I'll take responsibility for this," but deep in the mind "he is utterly unattached to 'mine'" (完全不着我所) [6709]. This is what the Saṃyuktāgama (《雜阿含經》, "Connected Discourses") calls "skillfully understanding worldly names, able to accord with worldly conventions in conventional expression with equanimity" (善解世名字,能顺应世俗进行平等假名说) — when he says "I," it is merely for the convenience of worldly communication; in his mind there is not a trace of deluded grasping [6709, 6735].

Scenario Two: Scrolling on the phone and seeing peers' success and ostentation

* Where people most easily misproject: * Misreading: Many people think "right view" means "telling yourself not to be envious, to bless others," or "go with the flow, lie flat, keep your mindset level." * Misidentification: At best this is worldly goodwill or a passive countermeasure, still erected within the worldly, outflowing framework of "there is a self, there are others, there is success, there is failure." * The true reflection of the unlearned right view: * The unlearned right view penetrates the images and text on the algorithmic screen, directly seeing the process of "origin" (集, samudaya) — the root of envy and emptiness is the mind's "grasping" (取, clinging) at illusory appearances. * The adept sage sees a rival's success or failure just as one watches clouds gather and disperse, having utterly cut off envy, covetousness, and restless regret among the five hindrances (五蓋, pañca-nīvaraṇa) [4953]. His mind manifests the extreme tranquility of "removing all crookedness, removing all defilement, removing all delusion" (除一切曲、除一切秽、除一切痴) [4610].


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary people live in an age of "extreme explosion of information and desire." Modern technology (such as AI, recommendation algorithms, and social media) has effectively built an extremely sophisticated mechanism of "grasping (取) and reaction (行)." The algorithm, by precisely calculating your greed, anxiety, and fear, continuously feeds you content that stirs your emotions, keeping your five-aggregate system in constant high-frequency oscillation.

In this environment, contemporary people widely face anxiety disorders, mental exhaustion, and crises of existential meaning. We often try to seek redemption through modern science or psychology: * Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or brain science: Helps us identify "cognitive distortions" (analogous to correcting the blind perception aggregate, 想蘊), moderating emotions through the regulation of neurotransmitters (such as dopamine and serotonin). * Costs and limitations: Science and psychology provide excellent "worldly antidotes" in the contemporary era, but their limitation lies in the fact that they typically aim at "building a healthier, more adaptive 'self' (Self)." Scientific research still cannot define the nature of consciousness (the "Hard Problem" in neuroscience), let alone lead humanity across the ultimate existential anxiety (aging, death, and impermanence) engendered by the "sense of self-existence."

This is precisely why contemporary people need the "unlearned right view" as the culminating piece of this classical wisdom: 1. It provides the ultimate coordinate of liberation: It tells us that psychological regulation (worldly right view) is only the first step; true freedom lies not in "shaping a powerful self," but in penetrating, through outflow-free wisdom, that the "self" is but a dynamic illusion of the five aggregates. 2. It utterly severs the root of mental exhaustion: The unlearned right view points to the thorough eradication of ignorance (無明, avidyā) and the five hindrances (五蓋) [4953]. When a person no longer regards bodily and mental reactions as "I," then all the world's praise and blame, gain and loss, birth, aging, sickness, and death can no longer shake his inner peace.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

* Misreading One: Thinking that the unlearned right view is a "wooden-and-stone state of caring about nothing, unmoved and indifferent." * Clarification: This confuses "outflow-free liberation" with "neutrality" (無記, avyākṛta, i.e., numbness) or "apathy." The canon records that an arhat who has accomplished the unlearned right view possesses extremely skillful wisdom (巧便𭶑慧觀察) [7816], capable of perceiving all internal and external dharmas with extreme acuity and clarity. They have not lost their capacity for feeling; rather, when feelings arise, the mind no longer produces the clinging and leakage of greed, aversion, and delusion (no leakage of mind arises, 不起心漏) [5124, 8012]. * Misreading Two: Thinking that when an arhat says "I" or "mine," it means he still has self-grasping (我執, ātma-grāha). * Clarification: The Saṃyuktāgama (《雜阿含經》) provides a specific clarification at the level of philosophy of language: although the arhat has completely eradicated self-grasping (not clinging to "mine," 不著我所), because he "skillfully understands worldly names" (善解世名字), he will, for the sake of communicating with worldlings, accord with worldly conventions in "conventional expression with equanimity" (平等假名說) [6709, 6735]. When the arhat says "I'll go get my bowl" or "This is my robe," it is merely the use of linguistic tools; in his mind there is not the slightest substantial illusion of "I" or "mine" [6709]. * Misreading Three: Thinking that one can "pretend" or "directly replicate" the unlearned right view in daily life. * Clarification: The unlearned right view is the fruit-wisdom (果位智慧) of the path, not a view that can be "conjured up" out of thin air. The canon emphasizes that to attain the unlearned right view, one must first pass through the "learner" stage, cut off the five hindrances (covetousness, ill will, sloth-and-torpor, restlessness-and-remorse, doubt), pass through "the learner's achievement of the eightfold path" (學見迹成就八支, from learned right view to learned right concentration), obtain "the initial knowledge of the exhaustion of outflows" (初漏盡智), and only then can one progressively realize "ultimate knowledge of non-arising" (究竟無知/無生智, anutpāda-jñāna) and the unlearned right view [4457, 4953, 7886]. Treating the outflow-free wisdom of the fruit as a verbal slogan (such as "Everything is empty, so I don't need to make any effort") is an extremely dangerous form of wild Zen and a grave misconception.

In summary, the "unlearned right view" (無學正見) is a bright lamp at the end of the path of liberation. It reveals the ultimate truth of life: when the covering of all defilements is stripped away and wisdom illuminates, as it truly is, the original face of the five aggregates and the six sense bases, the mind can cross beyond birth-and-death and sorrow, attaining absolute freedom, purity, and stillness.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 「无学正见」(aśaikṣa-samyag-dṛṣṭi)是佛教修行者在证得阿罗汉(或译「阿罗诃」)等无学圣果时,所成就的究竟、无漏、出世间之正见。它是无学圣者所成就的诸多无漏功德之首,代表着修行者已彻底断除一切根本烦恼,对四圣谛等佛法真理获得了最为圆满、无漏的智慧观照。在经典中,无学正见不仅是区分「学人」(有学)与「无学人」的关键标志,也是引导圣者走向究竟解脱、证得无生智与不动解脱的决定性力量。 二、 主要阐述 根据《中阿含经》与《杂阿含经》的记载,无学正见的具体内涵、修行实践及成就者的解脱境界,可以从以下几个维度进行系统阐述: 1. 圣出世间的无漏智慧:在正见的分类中,经典将其严格区分为两种层次:一种是「世、俗,有漏、有取,转向善趣」的正见;另一种则是「圣、出世间,无漏、不取,正尽苦,转向苦边」的正见。无学正见即属于后者。这种正见的具体实践,是圣弟子对「苦、集、灭、道」四圣谛进行深切思惟,与「无漏思惟相应」,并在法上进行「选择、分别求觉」,以「巧便𭶑慧观察」。 2. 断除根本烦恼与生死的实践路径:无学正见的修习与成就,是断除无明、老死等根本烦恼的必经之路。修行者在听闻正法后,必须首先断除「五盖」(即心秽、慧羸的五种覆盖),进而修习以「无学正见」为首的十无学法。这不仅是「欲断无明者」与「欲别知无明者」的唯一途径,也是想要彻底了知「老死」这一生命忧苦的修行者所必须依凭的智慧。 3. 观照方法与究竟解脱境界:无学圣者(阿罗汉)在成就无学正见后,会运用「正智观察」来审视「内六入处」、「外六入处」以及「五阴」。通过这种如实的智慧观察,圣者得以达到「不起心漏」、「尽诸有漏」,实现「正智心善解脱」。此时,圣者会生起决定性的自证自知:「我生已尽,梵行已立,所作已作(或作『所作已办』),自知不受后有(或作『不更受有』)」。 4. 成就者的功德与地位:成就无学正见的圣者,其心灵达到了极致的清净与自由。经典以「清净良马」经调御后成为「无上调」之王乘为喻,形容成就无学正见等法的贤良智人,达到了「无上止、第一止」的境界,能「除一切曲,除一切秽,除一切怖,除一切痴,除一切谄,止一切尘,净一切垢而无所着」。因此,此类圣者在世间「可敬可重,可奉可祠」,是「一切天人良福田也」。 三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同部派的经典及不同译本中,对于无学正见及其相关概念的表述存在着细微而重要的差异: 1. 无学法的支分数量与名称:《中阿含经》(东晋僧伽提婆译)中,将无学圣者所成就的功德法统称为「漏尽阿罗诃成就十支」或「十无学法」,其范围从「无学正见」开始,直至「无学正智」。而《杂阿含经》(刘宋求那跋陀罗译)中,则将「无学」定义为「无学正见成就」乃至「无学正定成就」的八支圣道圆满状态,并将此八支成就冠以「圣漏尽」之名。 2. 圣者称呼与解脱宣告的译语:对于无学圣者,《中阿含经》多译为「阿罗诃」;而《杂阿含经》则多译为「阿罗汉」。在宣告解脱的「四句偈」中,《中阿含经》表述为「生已尽,梵行已立,所作已办,不更受有」;《杂阿含经》则表述为「我生已尽,梵行已立,所作已作,自知不受后有」。 3. 核心名相的用词:对于构成众生身心的五种要素,《中阿含经》等通常使用「五蕴」之名,而《杂阿含经》在此处则特用「五阴」一词。 4. 世俗语言应用的无咎性:《杂阿含经》特别提到,已尽诸漏、持最后边身的阿罗汉,虽然已完全「不着我所」,但因其「善解世名字」,能顺应世俗进行「平等假名说」,故其口称「我」或「我所」时并无过咎。这一点在《中阿含经》的相关论述中未作此类细致的语言哲学式澄清。 四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与「学正见」(有学八支)的关系:在修行位次上,经典将圣弟子的修行划分为「学」与「无学」两个阶段。学人阶段成就的是「学见迹成就八支」(即从「学正见」至「学正定」);只有到了无学阶段,才能成就「无学正见」乃至「无学正智」的十无学法。在修行的进程中,修行者(学人)在学戒之时,首先获得的是「初漏尽智」,进而才能获得无学阶段的「究竟无知」(即无生智),从而证得「无知解脱」与「不动解脱」。 2. 与「五盖」的关系:「五盖」是障碍智慧、污染心灵的「心秽、慧羸」之法。修行者必须彻底断除五盖,方能修习并成就以无学正见为首的十无学法,从而达到对无明与老死的彻底别知与断除。 五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》卷五十二:「漏尽阿罗诃成就十支。云何为十?一者无学正见……至十者无学正智。……若成就此十支者,我施设为成就善、第一善、无上士,得第一义、质直沙门。」 2. 《中阿含经》卷五十八:「若有欲断无明者,若有欲别知无明者,彼一切当断五盖、心秽、慧羸,修十无学法。云何为十?修无学正见……至修无学正智。」 3. 《杂阿含经》卷二十八:「何等为无学?谓无学正见成就,乃至无学正定成就,是名无学。」 4. 《杂阿含经》卷二十八:「何等为圣、出世间、无漏、不取、正尽苦、转向苦边正见?谓圣弟子苦、苦思惟,集、灭、道、道思惟,无漏思惟相应,于法选择、分别求觉、巧便𭶑慧观察,是名圣、出世间、无漏、不取、正尽苦、转向苦边正见。」 5. 《杂阿含经》卷三:「若罗汉,诸漏已尽,所作已作,离诸重担,逮得己利,尽诸有结,正智心善解脱。彼如是知:我生已尽,梵行已立,所作已作,自知不受后有。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》以「無學正見」作為「十無學法」之端,配合「乃至無學正智」的略舉結構,呈現從正見至正智的完整無學道品序列。以下從數個層面歸納本經對此概念之論述。

一、十無學法中之首項地位。本經反覆以「修無學正見,乃至修無學正智」表述無學正見之位置與內涵。此「乃至」式列舉,將無學正見置於十無學法之首位,與無學正智首尾相應,標誌聖者於見地上已達究竟離染、正見圓滿而無漏。

二、修行斷證之脈絡。經文明示,無學正見之修得須依前行:值如來出世、無所著、等正覺、明行成為、善逝、世間解、無上士、道法御、天人師,號佛、眾祐;彼斷五蓋——心穢、慧羸,然後方修無學正見乃至無學正智。此結構顯示無學正見非孤立之法,而是經由斷蓋、修道而至之究竟正見,為「數斷、解脫、過度、拔絕、滅止、總知、別知」無明老死等煩惱流轉之究竟對治。

三、良馬之喻與成就之功德。本經以清淨良馬經御者「數數治」而得調御為喻,說明具足十無學法之賢良智人,於無學正見成就之時,「調、善調,得無上調、得第一無上調,無上止、得第一止」,能「除一切曲、除一切穢、除一切怖、除一切癡、除一切諂,止一切塵,淨一切垢而無所著」,「可敬可重,可奉可祠」,為「一切天人良福田」。此譬喻凸顯無學正見非僅觀念,而是經長時數數治練後所成就之無可動搖的究竟調御。

四、獨特術語形式與功能面向。本經論述無學正見時,以「十無學法」為整體框架展開,並未孤說一法;同時以「欲斷無明者」「欲別知老死者」為實踐目的,顯示無學正見兼具「斷」與「別知」兩種功能面向。又經中以「第一治」「第一無上調」「第一行」「第一止」等層層升進之讚詞,強調其無可超越之圓滿性。值得注意的是,本經稱呼無學聖者成就之果德為「無上調」與「無上止」,而非常見之「解脫」「涅槃」等詞,凸顯其以調御為喻的特殊表述。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本經(《雜阿含經》)對「無學正見」的論述,集中在兩段短經中,以「學」與「無學」的對舉方式呈現八支聖道的圓滿相貌,並以「聖漏盡」一名統攝其義。

一、以「學」與「無學」對顯八支聖道 在第一段經文中,佛陀開宗明義宣說:「我當說學及無學」,接著以同樣的八個項目,分別冠以「學」與「無學」加以區別:「學正見成就,學正志、正語、正業、正命、正方便、正念、正定成就,是名為學」;「無學正見成就,無學正志、正語、正業、正命、正方便、正念、正定成就,是名無學」。由此可見,本經所謂「無學正見」,意指已圓滿成就、無需再修學之聖者所具的究竟正見,其為無學聖者八支聖道之首項,與學者所成就之正見同名而異階。

此處值得注意的是,本經以「正志」一詞取代他經常見的「正思惟」,並以「正方便」取代他經常見的「正精進」,此為《雜阿含經》傳譯八支聖道之固定譯名。讀者應據此經文用詞理解:「正志」即「正思惟」,「正方便」即「正精進」,此乃同義異譯,須歸於一義。

二、以「聖漏盡」收攝無學正見之究竟義 第二段經文進一步以「聖漏盡」之名概括無學聖道。佛說:「云何為聖漏盡?謂無學正見成就,乃至無學正定成就,是名聖漏盡」。此段以「無學正見成就」起首、以「無學正定成就」收尾,中間以「乃至」二字概括其餘六支,等於把無學八支聖道全體標誌為「聖漏盡」之體相。由此可見,無學正見不僅是八支之首,更是「聖漏盡」之正見——亦即已斷盡一切煩惱漏的聖者所圓滿具足的無漏正見,其體性即是究竟無漏、不更待學。

三、旁及正士、大士之分位 第一段經末又附記:「如正士、如大士,亦如是說」,表示上述「學」與「無學」之分判,亦同樣適用於「正士」與「大士」之修行階位,顯示本經並非孤立地談無學正見,而是將其置於整個「學—無學」、「凡—聖」、「正士—大士」的修道階位脈絡中加以定位。

綜上,本經論述「無學正見」之核心方式有二:一是將其置於八支聖道之首,以「學/無學」之對舉區分其階位;二是將其與「聖漏盡」之究竟義相連結,凸顯其為無漏、究竟、不可再學之圓滿正見。所用語詞方面,本經統一使用「正志」、「正方便」,與其他經中常見之「正思惟」、「正精進」用詞不同,讀者宜留意此一譯名差異。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》對「無學正見」的論述,可歸納為以下數端:

一、定義與八見分類 本論於論眼根等品中,將法界中的「見」分為八種:身見等五染污見、世間正見、有學正見、無學正見。其界定極為簡要——「有學正見,謂有學身中諸無漏見;無學正見,謂無學身中諸無漏見」;至於世間正見,則定為「意識相應善有漏慧」。由此可知,無學正見以「無學身」為所依人,以「諸無漏見」為其體性,與有學正見同屬無漏慧之聚,唯所依人由有學進至無學而有別。

二、「無學」名義與學/無學法的界定 本論以「為得別果所應修學,此無有故,得無學名」闡明無學者之得名由來;並以增上戒、定、慧三學為學之自體。進而區別「學法」與「無學法」:「學法,謂有學者無漏有為法;無學法,謂無學者無漏有為法。」涅槃不名為學亦不名無學,因無學異生亦成就故,有學異生亦成就故。此處對學、無學所作的嚴格界定,正是無學正見得以成立的語境。

三、無學正見與盡智、無生智的關涉 本論於分別賢聖品中討論不動種性阿羅漢之證位時云:「盡智無間起無生智,非更有盡智、無學正見生。」而其餘阿羅漢於盡智無間,可生盡智,亦可「即引生無學正見非無生智」,以其後容退故。又明「一切應果皆有此(無學正見)故」;不動法於無生智後,亦得起無生智或無學正見。可見無學正見在無學位中與盡智、無生智同屬無漏慧之現行差別。

四、術語形式 本論通篇以「無學」一詞表達非學之義,並以「阿羅漢」為無學聖者之通稱。其所用術語為「無學正見」(未見「非學正見」之異名出現於本卷論述中),與有學正見、學法、無學法、涅槃、應果等名相,共同構成一套完整的修道位階術語系統。

Related