Dharma · AI Companion

此岸

apāra

譬喻生死烦恼的未度境地AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

In everyday speech and literature, we often hear of "this shore" (此岸) and "the far shore" (彼岸). People habitually take "this shore" to mean the suffering of ordinary life, the clamor of the mundane world, and imagine "the far shore" as some distant, sacred, post-liberation utopia.

But in the early Buddhist canon's core text, the *Saṃyuktāgama* (《杂阿含经》), "this shore" is not a physical location, nor is it a vague reference to "a miserable state of life." The Buddha gave it an extremely precise—even chilling—definition: "This shore is the six sense bases" (此岸者,谓六入处).

To understand "this shore," we must return to this rigorous system of classical Dharma and see how it reveals the actual reality of our daily existence, moment by moment.


What This Concept Is Saying

In the *Saṃyuktāgama*, "this shore" (Sanskrit *apāra*) and "the far shore" form a pair of central metaphors running through the path of liberation. The sūtra defines and demarcates "this shore" at multiple levels:

1. The Classical Definition by Sense Base and Object: The Six Internal Sense Bases

In the famous teaching at the banks of the Ganges, the Buddha states plainly: "This shore is the six sense bases; the far shore is the six external sense bases" (此岸者,谓六入处;彼岸者,谓六外入处). * This shore (the six internal sense bases): refers to our six internal sensory subjects—eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind. * The far shore (the six external sense bases): refers to the six external objective domains—form (visual objects), sound, smell, taste, touch, and mental objects (dharmas).

Here, one must absolutely not narrow the "six internal sense bases" down to the physical body. They constitute the entire sensory and mental mechanism by which we receive information and generate subjective experience. As long as you still depend on seeing with the eye, hearing with the ear, and thinking with the mind to "grasp" the world, and take this sensory subject to be "I," you are on "this shore."

2. The Definition by Action and View: The Ten Unwholesome Deeds and Wrong Views

When the Buddha answered the brahmin Jānusoṇi, he extended "this shore" to the level of behavior and cognition: whatever is "killing living beings" up to "wrong view"—the ten unwholesome deeds and inverted views—is collectively called "this shore"; while "not killing" up to "right view"—the ten wholesome deeds and right views—is called "the far shore."

Here, "this shore" represents the chaotic state driven by unwholesome karma and mistaken cognition.

3. The Living Reality of Beings on This Shore: Wandering and Racing About

The sūtra uses highly vivid verses to depict the ordinary state of the world: "All the various worlds, wandering about, roam on this shore" (一切诸世间,徘徊游此岸), "All classes of living beings, racing and running, traverse this shore" (一切众生类,駈驰走此岸).

Under the dominion of the sensory subject (the six internal sense bases) and of unwholesome deeds and wrong views, beings rush about blindly like headless flies, revolving without cease, entirely unaware that they are trapped on the shore. Those who can truly cross over this shore are called in the sūtra "rare among people, those who can cross to the far shore" (希有诸人民,能度于彼岸).

4. The Practical Path Beyond This Shore: Not Clinging to Either Shore and the "End of the World"

The Buddha used the simile of a great tree drifting downstream in the Ganges: if a great tree can "not cling to this shore, not cling to the far shore, not sink to the bottom, not get stuck on a sandbar, not enter a whirlpool, not be taken by people, not be taken by non-humans, and not rot" (不着此岸,不着彼岸,不沈水底,不阂洲渚,不入洄澓,人亦不取,非人不取,又不腐败), it will flow smoothly into the sea. * Not clinging to this shore: not grasping at the six internal sense bases (the sensory subject). * Not clinging to the far shore: not grasping at the six external sense bases (external objects—including even the attachment to a state of purity achieved by "being free of the six sense objects").

The Buddha further points out that transcending "this shore" does not require physically running to the edge of the material universe; rather, one must "with right wisdom truly understand, with awakened intelligence reach the end of the world" (正智能谛了,觉慧达世间) to evenly and awakenedly know the "end of the world" (世界边). If one can achieve "not [being] there, nor is that [being] here, nor in between the two" (非于彼,彼亦复非此,亦非两中间)—not falling into either end of the subject-object dichotomy—that is attaining the limit of suffering (苦边).


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

So that the classical definition does not become an empty label, let us map the operation of "this shore" strictly onto a scene most familiar to contemporary people—"scrolling through your phone late at night":

1. The six internal sense bases (this shore) activate: In the dead of night, your "eye sense base" (eyes) looks at the screen, your "body sense base" (fingers) swipes, your "mind sense base" (brain/mind) receives information. You feel exhausted, yet you have a strong intuition: "It is I who am watching, it is I who am anxious; this is my unique feeling." * Where people most often mis-map it: People think "this shore" is the phone, or the miserable overtime life. Wrong. The phone is an external sense base (form/mental object). The real "this shore" is your sensory subject (the six internal sense bases)—that which is clinging desperately to sensory experience, mistaking the false for the real.

2. Wrong views and racing about (wandering on this shore): The algorithm pushes posts at you showing peers making a million a year, buying houses and cars. Your "mind sense base" produces comparison; anxiety and envy arise within. At this moment, "wrong view" rises silently—you think external objective conditions can make you feel better; you think just one more scroll will find the antidote. You cannot stop; you switch from one app to another. * Mapping to the classical canon: This is precisely what the sūtra calls "racing and running, traversing this shore" (駈驰走此岸). You are driven by the delusion of the six internal sense bases, blindly sprinting through the mire of sensory reaction.

3. Double clinging (clinging to this shore and to the far shore): * Clinging to this shore: You frantically scroll short videos craving stimulation, deeply sunk in the instant gratification of eyes and brain. * Clinging to the far shore: Suddenly seized by guilt, you turn off the phone, force yourself to "think of nothing," even hate your eyes and the phone, single-mindedly pursuing an ideal state of absolute calm, free of all noise. * What the Dharma points out: The former is "clinging to this shore" (grasping at the six internal sense bases and sensory stimulation); the latter is "clinging to the far shore" (grasping at separation from the six external sense bases or at a state of purity). The Buddha said that as long as you are still being pulled between the two ends of "subject (I)" and "object (circumstances/state of purity)," you are still wandering in the great river, not yet flowing toward the ocean of nirvāṇa.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life is enveloped by highly advanced "sensory technology." We are wrapped in the six external sense bases meticulously engineered by algorithms (videos, sounds, visual stimuli), while our six internal sense bases (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind) are overloaded and overstimulated without limit.

1. Disarming the poisoning of the "attention economy": The modern business model is essentially a fight to capture your "six internal sense bases." If you do not understand that "this shore is the six sense bases," you will forever think "this news story made me angry," "that product made me happy." The Dharma tells you: suffering is not given by external circumstances; rather, your six internal sense bases, lacking right knowing and seeing, generate defilement and bondage toward external objects.

2. Breaking the illusion of "escapism": Modern people desperately crave "the far shore"—changing jobs, retreating to Yunnan, quitting work for a sabbatical, even pursuing some kind of mind-body-spirit emptying. But if your six internal sense bases (your cognitive habits, neural circuits, the pattern of clinging to "self") have not changed, you have merely moved "this shore" to a tropical island. As long as the six internal sense bases are still driven by ignorance, wherever you go, that is this shore.

3. Providing a non-dualistic path of liberation: "Not clinging to this shore, not clinging to the far shore" offers a supremely high life-wisdom. It does not tell you to sever the senses (that would be "dead-tree Chan"), nor does it tell you to indulge desire. It tells you to be like that great tree flowing downstream in the Ganges: the senses operate normally (the eye sees forms, the ear hears sounds), but the mind does not get stuck in the sensory subject (not clinging to this shore), nor does it get stuck in external circumstances or in attachment to purity (not clinging to the far shore).


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

* Misreading One: "This shore" refers to the physical earth we live on; "the far shore" refers to heaven or a post-mortem nirvāṇa pure land. * Clarification: In the early *Saṃyuktāgama*, "this shore" and "the far shore" are not geographical concepts but correlative dharmas. This shore is the six internal sense bases (the sensory subject); the far shore is the six external sense bases (objective domains). "Crossing to the far shore" does not mean flying to another space in the physical body; it means no longer being bound by the internal and external six sense bases, attaining an awakened state.

* Misreading Two: Since the six internal sense bases are "this shore," can we reach the far shore by "turning off" or destroying the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind? * Clarification: The six sense bases are the natural mechanism of physiological and psychological functioning. The Buddha never told anyone to gouge out their eyes or stop thinking. What the sūtra says is that "not knowing and seeing the six sense bases as they truly are... giving rise to defilement and clinging" is the root of suffering. The key of practice is "knowing and seeing as they truly are" that the six sense bases are impermanent and not-self, so that when facing the six sense objects one is "without defilement, without bondage"—not destroying the senses themselves.

* Misreading Three: As long as one does many good deeds (the ten wholesome deeds), one has already left "this shore." * Clarification: Although the sūtra defines the ten unwholesome deeds/wrong views as this shore and the ten wholesome deeds/right views as the far shore, this is only a practical ladder. If one does not understand the not-self nature of the six sense bases, then even in doing good deeds and cultivating concentration, if the clinging arises—"I am cultivating goodness, I am pursuing purity"—one is still "clinging to the far shore." The true "end of suffering" (苦边) is to no longer cling to "this shore, the far shore, or the middle between the two."

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在《杂阿含经》(刘宋求那跋陀罗译)中,「此岸」(apāra)与「彼岸」是一组核心的比喻,用以阐释众生在生死中流转的状态与解脱涅槃的境界。经中对「此岸」给予了具体且独特的法义定义。首先,从根境(入处)的角度来看,佛陀在恒水边的教示中明确指出:「此岸者,谓六入处」。这表明「此岸」代表内在的六种感官主体(眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意内入处)。其次,从善恶业与邪正见的角度来看,佛陀向生闻婆罗门解释时,将凡是「杀生者」与「邪见者」等恶行与邪见之人定义为「此岸」。

二、主要阐述

《杂阿含经》从多个维度对「此岸」的生存实相以及如何超越此岸进行了深入的阐述:

1. 众生在此岸的生存实相: 经中指出,绝大多数的众生都在此岸奔波流转,无法解脱。如偈颂所言:「一切诸世间,徘徊游此岸」,以及「一切众生类,駈驰走此岸」。这生动地描绘了众生在生死轮回中盲目奔波、无法自拔的状态。相对地,能够真正超越此岸、到达彼岸的人非常罕见,经中称之为「希有诸人民,能度于彼岸」、「少有修善人,能度于彼岸」。

2. 度越此岸的实践路径与隐喻: 关于如何从「此岸」过渡到「彼岸」(即「度彼岸」),经中提出了多种实践路径: - 随顺正法律与观察法相:众生若能在佛陀的「正法律」中善加随顺,并「观察法法相」,便能度过这难渡的生死之岸,摧伏死魔军。 - 大树流注大海的比喻:佛陀以恒水中顺流而下的大树为喻,指出修行者若能做到「不着此岸,不着彼岸,不沈水底,不阂洲渚,不入洄澓,人亦不取,非人不取,又不腐败」,便能顺趣、流注、临趣涅槃。在此比喻中,「不着此岸」即是不执著于内六入处。 - 了知「世界边」:经中将度彼岸与到达「世界边」相联系。修行者并非靠肉身游步走到世界的边缘,而是以「正智能谛了,觉慧达世间」来平等觉知「世界边」,如此方名「度世间彼岸」。 - 超越两端与中间:修行者若能做到「非于彼,彼亦复非此,亦非两中间」,不执著于彼岸、此岸及两者之中间,即是达到苦的边际(苦边)。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《杂阿含经》中,对于「此岸」与「彼岸」的具体对应和表述,因应不同的说法对象与语境而有所差异:

1. 根境对应的表述:在恒水边的教示中,经文以「六入处」(内六入处)对应「此岸」,以「六外入处」对应「彼岸」。这种将内在感官与外在境界分别对应此彼两岸的表述,是本经独特的法义呈现。 2. 业力与见解的表述:在对生闻婆罗门的说法中,经文则将「杀生者」乃至「邪见者」等十恶业与邪见直接称为「此岸」;而将「不杀生者」乃至「正见者」等十善业与正见称为「彼岸」。此处的「此岸」不再仅指生理或心理的入处,而是指涉不善的业行与颠倒的见解。 3. 世间与世界边的表述:在探讨空间与世间的极限时,经文引入了「世界边」的概念,将超越世间称为「度世间彼岸」,此时的「此岸」隐含为未觉知世间、未达世界边的流转状态。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「彼岸」的关系: 「此岸」与「彼岸」是相待而立的概念。此岸代表内六入处、恶业与邪见,是众生流转生死的世间;彼岸则代表外六入处、善业与正见,最终指向解脱与涅槃。 2. 与「六入处」及「六外入处」的关系: 经中明确将「此岸」等同于「六入处」(内六处),将「彼岸」等同于「六外入处」。修行者若能不执著于内六处(不着此岸)与外六处(不着彼岸),方能流向涅槃。 3. 与「三有海」的关系: 经中以「三有海」比喻众生流转的世间,而「此岸」即是众生在此生死大海中徘徊、驱驰的起点。唯有度过此「三有海」,方能免除老病死等一切忧悲苦恼。 4. 与「涅槃」的关系: 「度彼岸」的终极指向即是「涅槃」。超越此岸、不着两岸,是趋向涅槃的必经之路。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《杂阿含经》卷三十七:「此岸者,谓六入处;彼岸者,谓六外入处。」 2. 《杂阿含经》卷三十七:「杀生者是此岸,不杀生者是彼岸……邪见者是此岸,正见者是彼岸。」 3. 《杂阿含经》卷二十六:「一切诸世间,徘徊游此岸;希有诸人民,能度于彼岸。」 4. 《杂阿含经》卷三十七:「一切众生类,駈驰走此岸;少有修善人,能度于彼岸。」 5. 《杂阿含经》卷三十七:「不着此岸,不着彼岸,不沈水底,不阂洲渚,不入洄澓,人亦不取,非人不取,又不腐败,顺趣、流注、临趣涅槃。」 6. 《杂阿含经》卷三十三:「非于彼,彼亦复非此,亦非两中间,是名为苦边。」

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》以「此岸」為核心譬喻,從多個層面論述生死煩惱之未度境地,其用語直質,未見後世「彼岸」「此岸」之抽象化處理,而始終扣緊具體法義以立喻。

一、以善惡法對舉定義此岸、彼岸。經中佛告生聞婆羅門:「殺生者,謂此岸;不殺生者,謂彼岸。邪見者,謂此岸;正見者,謂彼岸。」 此處此岸並非泛指世間,而是確切等同於不善法——殺生乃至邪見等十不善業道之類;彼岸則等同於善法。此岸與彼岸之對立,即是惡與善、染與淨之對立,用語極為質樸,不作玄遠之談。

二、以六入處為此岸、六外入處為彼岸。經中佛於阿毘闍恒水邊,見大樹隨流而下,遂以之喻比丘修行:「此岸者,謂六入處。彼岸者,謂六外入處。」 此處此岸指內六入處(眼耳鼻舌身意),彼岸指外六入處(色聲香味觸法),與前段以善惡法對舉之定義角度不同。此處之要旨不在「從此岸渡至彼岸」,而在「不著此岸,不著彼岸」——大樹不著兩岸、不沈水底、不閡洲渚、不入洄澓、人亦不取、非人不取、又不腐敗,方能「臨趣、流注、浚輸涅槃」。修行者於內六入處與外六入處俱不執著,始能趣向涅槃。經中更逐一解釋諸喻:「人取」謂習近俗人及出家者,憂喜苦樂悉與共同;「非人取」謂願修梵行以求生天;「洄澓」謂還戒退轉;「腐敗」謂犯戒行惡、非沙門為沙門像。此段為此岸譬喻最詳盡之展開。

三、以偈頌嘆眾生徘徊此岸、難度生死。經中兩處偈頌皆言:「一切諸世間,徘徊遊此岸」、「一切眾生類,駈馳走此岸」,而「希有諸人民,能度於彼岸」、「少有修善人,能度於彼岸」。此岸在此為一切眾生流轉之常態,彼岸則為極少數人能至之境地。偈中明言能度之條件:「於此正法律,能善隨順者」、「於此正法律,觀察法法相」,即須於佛所說正法律中如實隨順、觀察諸法之相,方能「度彼岸,摧伏死魔軍」、「度彼生死難度岸」。此處「生死難度岸」一語,將此岸—彼岸之空間譬喻直接等同於生死之渡越。

四、超越此彼兩邊即為苦邊。經中另有偈云:「若汝非於彼,彼亦復非此,亦非兩中間,是則為苦邊。」 此處不說「渡此岸至彼岸」,而說非此、非彼、非中間,三者俱離即為苦之邊際。此與恒水大樹喻「不著此岸,不著彼岸」 之旨趣相通:究竟處非從此岸移至彼岸,而是於兩邊俱無所著。

綜觀《雜阿含經》所見此岸之論,其用語形式始終為「此岸」「彼岸」之對舉,未見以「生死岸」「煩惱岸」等後起複合詞替代者;其義涵則隨语境而有三層:以不善法為此岸、以六入處為此岸、以一切眾生徘徊流轉之狀態為此岸。渡越之方,或曰善隨順正法律,或曰觀察法法相,或曰於內外入處俱不執著,而歸趣皆在涅槃與苦邊。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》以「此岸/彼岸」為核心譬喻框架,在多處經文中反覆運用,且每次都給出明確的義理對應,而非僅作修辭性比喻。其論述可歸為三個層次:

一、三結繫縛——此岸即身邪。經中佛告諸比丘:「有三結使,繫縛眾生,不能從此岸至彼岸」,三結為身邪、戒盜、疑。此處最關鍵的是經文自身給出的定義:「云何此岸?云何彼岸?所謂此岸者身邪是,彼岸者所謂身邪滅是。」 亦即此岸並非泛指世間或生死整體,而是精確地等同於「身邪」(計身有我、生吾我之想);彼岸則是身邪之滅。經文又以「兩牛同一軛,終不相離」喻三結之繫縛,強調眾生為三結所縛則「不能得從此岸至彼岸」。值得注意的是,本經用「身邪」而非後世論書常見的「身見」或音譯「薩迦耶見」,用「戒盜」而非「戒禁取」,用「結使」稱煩惱繫縛,這些皆是本經特有的術語形式。

二、七事水喻——渡河階位。經以七種水中姿態譬喻修行深淺:沒在水底、暫出水還沒、出水觀看、出頭而住、於水中行、出水欲到彼岸、已到彼岸。其中「欲至彼岸」對應斷下五結、成阿那含(不還果),「已至彼岸」對應盡有漏成無漏、於無餘涅槃界而般涅槃的阿羅漢。此處此岸雖未被逐字定義,但由「沒在水底」對應不善之法遍滿、經歷劫數不可療治可知,此岸一側即是未斷結使、沉淪生死的境地;彼岸則是「生死已盡,梵行已立,所作已辦,更不復受胎」。本經用「阿須倫」而非「阿修羅」,用「婬、怒、癡」而非「貪、瞋、癡」,亦為其譯語特色。

三、難陀水喻——此岸即身。另一處經文對渡河諸要素逐一配釋:「此岸者身也。彼岸者身滅耶。中沒者欲愛耶。在岸上者五欲也。」 此處此岸直接等同於「身」(五取蘊之身),彼岸為「身滅」,與第一處「此岸者身邪是」形成互補:一就見惑(身邪見)說,一就果報(有身)說,而彼岸皆歸於滅。經文又將「為水所迴轉」配「邪疑」,將「腐敗」配邪見、邪治、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定等八邪道,使渡河譬喻擴展為涵蓋見、修二道的完整映射。

綜上,《增壹阿含經》對此岸的論述有一貫結構:此岸是繫縛(三結、有身、欲愛),彼岸是滅(身邪滅、身滅、無餘涅槃);渡河不是空間遷移,而是斷結證滅。經中始終以「此岸/彼岸」對舉,未見用「生死岸」「此岸生死」等後出複合詞,術語保持簡質。

Related