Dharma · AI Companion

淨慧

vimala-prajñā

远离烦恼染污的清净智慧。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

净慧即无漏般若,须借性空见地(第2重)方能说「离染」;究竟处即离言般若(第4重)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In contemporary popular understanding, "wisdom" is often reduced to "high IQ," "thinking things through," or "the cold detachment of one who has seen through the world." But in Mahāyāna Buddhism—especially within the textual lineage of the *Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta-sūtra* (《大方等大集經》)—淨慧 (vimala-prajñā, "pure wisdom," also known as 清淨智慧, pure wisdom, or 淨般若波羅蜜, the pure perfection of wisdom) is by no means a mundane problem-solving skill. It is an undefiled (無漏, anāsrava) wisdom that utterly transcends attachment to names and marks, is tainted by no affliction whatsoever, and manifests unimpeded insight while resting on nothing at all.

To understand 淨慧, one must first trace its distinctive structure and layers within the classical texts:

1. The Name-and-Mark Foundation of Language and Contemplation

In early translations (such as the *大集經*), archaic nominal expressions are often preserved: 陰 (yīn) designates what we ordinarily know as the aggregates (蘊, skandha), and 入 (rù) designates the sense-bases (處, āyatana). These translation choices remind us that the starting point of 淨慧 is an unprejudiced, objective examination of the micro-constituents that compose life and experience—the aggregates, elements (界, dhātu), and sense-bases—"seeing that all aggregates, elements, and sense-bases enter entirely into the dharma-aggregate, dharma-element, and dharma-sense-base" (見一切陰、界、入悉入法陰、法界、法入).

2. The "Three Kinds of Pure Wisdom" and the Multi-layered "Threefold Purity" Contemplation

The sūtra teaches that when a bodhisattva receives the Buddha's prophecy (授記, vyākaraṇa)—that supremely exalted moment of receiving the prediction and confirmation of future buddhahood—the mind harbors not a trace of gain or loss, pride or arrogance, and reaches the state of "seeing no thought of self, no thought of the Buddha, and no thought of the prophecy" (不見我想、不見佛想,及授記想). This is what is called the "three kinds of pure wisdom" (三種淨慧). Built upon this foundation, a series of deeper "threefold purity" contemplations unfold: * Not observing the two extremes: seeing neither self, nor sentient beings, nor the true Dharma; seeing neither name, nor form, nor cause. * Penetrating the three times and body-and-mind: knowing that "the past is already exhausted, the future is not yet born, and the present does not abide"; contemplating the body as a moon in water (without substance), contemplating sound as inexpressible (names and marks all empty), and contemplating mind as invisible (impermanent and markless). * Abiding in the three gates of liberation (三解脫門): dwelling in emptiness (空, śūnyatā), signlessness (無相, animitta), and wishlessness (無願, apraṇihita).

3. The Twelve Wisdoms, Two Stillnesses, and Two Kinds of Purity

Within the systematic framework of the "pure perfection of wisdom" (淨般若波羅蜜), 淨慧 is concretized as the "twelve wisdoms" (十二慧)—the ability to see through without any obstruction all twelve dimensions: past, future, present, conditioned (有為, saṃskṛta), unconditioned (無為, asaṃskṛta), all worldly activities, the supramundane, eloquence, reality, worldly truth (世諦, saṃvṛti-satya), ultimate truth (第一義諦, paramārtha-satya), and the sharpness or dullness of sentient beings. It possesses the indestructible, vajra-like quality of being "able to break what is hard to break, able to contemplate what is hard to contemplate, able to resolve what is hard to resolve" (難破能破,難觀能觀,難解能解).

Moreover, 淨慧 comprises two core dimensions: * Two stillnesses (二寂靜): * Knowing the stillness of obstructing marks (知礙相寂靜): the ability to see that the nature of all afflictions (煩惱, kleśa) and hindrances is inherently still; * Knowing the stillness of unobstructed marks (知無礙相寂靜): even toward pure states such as "unimpeded penetration" and "liberation and ease," no attachment arises—these too return to stillness. * Two kinds of purity (二種淨): * Purity of no discernment (無覺淨): transcending the coarse subject-object discrimination, mental application, and thought-proliferation of ordinary beings; * Purity of freedom from all views (離諸見淨): completely free from all extreme views of annihilation and permanence, existence and non-existence, self and other.

4. The Dialectical Complementarity of Wisdom and Skillful Means

淨慧 is not a cold, self-isolating virtue; it forms a dialectical complement with "pure skillful means" (清淨方便, upāya): > "不取證者是名智慧,行三界者是名方便。" > *"Not grasping at attainment is called wisdom; moving through the three realms is called skillful means."* > "觀一切法無有二相……是名智慧;若能如是等觀眾生不證涅槃,是名方便。" > *"Contemplating all dharmas as having no dual marks… is called wisdom; being able to contemplate sentient beings in this way yet not grasping at nirvāṇa is called skillful means."*

Wisdom is "not grasping at attainment"—abiding in emptiness, not falling into a delusory sense of real existence, and not rushing to take refuge in personal nirvāṇa. Skillful means, by contrast, is "moving through the three realms"—with the realization of emptiness, descending deeply into the dust of the world to benefit others and to act, yet "though acting among all existences, the mind has no defiling attachment" (雖行諸有心無染著).

5. The Ultimate Turn: Contemplating All Afflictions as Wisdom Itself

The most striking aspect of 淨慧 lies in its attitude toward afflictions. It does not attain purity by "destroying afflictions," but by thoroughly penetrating the nature of afflictions as emptiness itself, thereby reaching the state of "contemplating all afflictions as wisdom itself" (觀諸煩惱即是智慧). In "not destroying a single dharma, not establishing a single dharma" (不壞一法、不成一法), it is complete in all Buddha-dharmas—neither disrupting the phenomenal functioning of worldly dharmas (not destroying a single dharma), nor establishing a truly existent dharma outside the mind (not establishing a single dharma).


A Walk-Through in Daily Life

Lest 淨慧 become merely an esoteric label, we can take the real experiences of contemporary people in the workplace, in intimate relationships, and in inner anxiety, and conduct a step-by-step "walk-through" strictly according to the classical definitions:

Scene One: Workplace Promotion and Performance Review (mapping to the "three kinds of pure wisdom" and the "thought of prophecy")

* Confused state: When you receive a major promotion ("receiving the prophecy"), you immediately generate the thought "I am really capable" (thought of self, 我想), develop absolute admiration for or dependence on the superior who promoted you (thought of the Buddha, 佛想), and feel a strong sense of possession over the title "executive" and its future returns (thought of the prophecy, 授記想). What follows is a tremendous fear of losing the position. * 淨慧 walk-through: When illuminated by 淨慧, you still handle business with clarity, but in your mind there is "no thought of self, no thought of the Buddha, and no thought of the prophecy." You know that the so-called "executive title" is merely a temporary aggregation of countless causes and conditions—team, market, capital. * Common mapping error: People often assume 淨慧 means "since it's all illusory, I'll just give up and quit." Wrong. 淨慧 means not grasping at attachment (wisdom) while simultaneously performing one's duties and serving the team with even greater professionalism (the skillful means of moving through the three realms).

Scene Two: Verbal Conflict in an Intimate Relationship (mapping to "contemplating sound as inexpressible, contemplating mind as invisible, the past already exhausted")

* Confused state: Your partner, losing emotional control, says something hurtful. Your brain immediately seizes on the words (grasping name and form, 抓取名色), begins dredging up old grievances (clinging to the past, 執著過去), projects into the future (anxiety about the future, 憂慮未來), and concludes "he/she doesn't love me at all." * 淨慧 walk-through: 1. Contemplate sound as inexpressible: Realize that the sound waves your partner emitted vanish in an instant; in essence they are merely vibrations of breath and vocal cords. The emotional name-and-mark behind them has no entity. 2. Contemplate mind as invisible: Realize that the other person's—and your own—angry thought-moment at that instant, when investigated, is fundamentally invisible and unattainable—merely a deluded thought arising and perishing in that very instant. 3. The past is already exhausted, the future is not yet born, the present does not abide: The harm of the previous second has already passed; the rupture that has not happened has not yet arrived; this very instant flashes by. * Result: You are not swept away by emotion—neither suppressing nor exploding—but can calmly pour a glass of water for the other person. This is "though acting among all existences, the mind has no defiling attachment."

Scene Three: Facing Inner Anxiety and Thoughts (mapping to "knowing the stillness of obstructing marks" and "contemplating afflictions as wisdom")

* Confused state: In the depths of insomnia at night, intense anxiety and fear rise in your mind. You try to "eliminate" the anxiety with various psychological techniques; the more you try to eliminate it, the heavier it becomes. * 淨慧 walk-through: 1. Know the stillness of obstructing marks: When you stop labeling this obstruction called "anxiety" and stop feeding it, you see clearly that its essence is nothing but a stream of neural signals and mental fluctuations—its nature is inherently empty and still. 2. Contemplate afflictions as wisdom: Do not treat "anxiety" as an enemy to be defeated (not destroying a single dharma), and do not fabricate an "absolutely calm self" (not establishing a single dharma). At this very moment when anxiety arises, see clearly that anxiety has no substance, no origin, and no destination—this very "seeing clearly" is itself the manifestation of 淨慧. The energy of anxiety is instantly transformed into an opportunity for awareness.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary people live in an era of "extreme overload of names and marks" and "intense emotional entrapment."

1. Breaking the "algorithmic identity" and self-fixation: Contemporary self-identity is often built on external labels—income, education, social media follower counts. Algorithms constantly reinforce our preferences and "views," plunging people into intense "view-fixation" (見固, clinging to a particular standpoint). 淨慧's "purity of freedom from all views" (離諸見淨) and "seeing neither name, nor form, nor cause" (不見名、色、因) act like a sharp sword, cutting through our dependence on illusory identity and restoring absolute spiritual freedom in the space-like wisdom of resting on nothing.

2. Resolving "over-reflection" and "mental attrition": The brain's "default mode network" (DMN) frequently plunges us into regret over the past and anxiety about the future. 淨慧's revelation of "the past is already exhausted, the future is not yet born, the present does not abide" and "purity of no discernment" (無覺淨) directly severs this endless self-referential rumination, liberating people from the torment of coarse mental proliferation.

3. Transcending the cognitive limits of "AI and dataism": Contemporary technology—large language models, deep learning algorithms—demonstrates extraordinarily powerful pattern recognition and knowledge reasoning abilities. On a mundane level, this resembles the broad handling of worldly dharmas and worldly truth within the "twelve wisdoms" of 淨慧. However, the logic of AI is always grounded in training on historical data and the mapping of oppositional concepts; it is necessarily built upon an architecture of "dependence" (有依). 淨慧, by contrast, is "expounding the Dharma while depending on nothing; this wisdom is pure as space" (說法無所依,此慧淨如空). It can not only illuminate things (knowing obstructing marks) but also, even toward the "illumining" itself, remains free of attachment (knowing the stillness of unobstructed marks). *A note of caution: using modern neuroscience or AI models as analogies for the Dharma can help us understand mechanisms such as "pattern recognition" and "decentralization." But science studies the functioning of objective faculties, whereas the 淨慧 of Buddhism is a state of liberation that utterly transcends the subject-object dichotomy. Science has not "proven" the Dharma, and we must not conflate the two.*


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: 淨慧 means "thoroughly suppressing or destroying afflictions"

* Clarification: This is a classic annihilationist view (斷滅見, uccheda-dṛṣṭi). The classical texts state clearly that the supreme subtlety of 淨慧 lies in "contemplating all afflictions as wisdom itself" and in "not destroying a single dharma, not establishing a single dharma." If one seeks purity by destroying afflictions, then that purity becomes another attachment standing in opposition to afflictions. 淨慧 is seeing through the nature of afflictions as emptiness itself—just as water freezes into ice and ice melts back into water; water and ice share one substance, and one need not destroy the ice to obtain water.

Misreading Two: 淨慧 means "hiding in emptiness and doing nothing at all"

* Clarification: This severs "wisdom" from "skillful means." The sūtra emphasizes: "不取證者是名智慧,行三界者是名方便。" If one pursues only one's own personal purity without contemplating sentient beings and without engaging in the world, one falls into the bondage of nirvāṇa. True 淨慧 is always paired with "pure skillful means"—the mind like space, utterly unattached, while the body moves through the red dust of the world, serving as a great ferry for all beings.

Misreading Three: 淨慧 is a kind of advanced "knowledge" or "philosophical theory"

* Clarification: Knowledge is something one accumulates—the more one learns, the heavier it becomes (attachment to names and marks). 淨慧, by contrast, is the subtraction of "having nothing attained" (無所得). The sūtra says 淨慧 possesses "purity of no discernment and purity of freedom from all views" (無覺淨、離諸見淨), and that "expounding the Dharma while depending on nothing, this wisdom is pure as space." Any "Buddhist knowledge" that can be memorized as a concept and paraded on social media still belongs to the category of "name and form" and "views"—it remains an arrow's flight away from true 淨慧. 淨慧 is the unimpeded, immediately present illumination, unstained by a single dust, that appears when all these names, marks, and views have fallen away.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在《大方等大集經》(大集部·《大方等大集經》)中,“淨慧”(亦称“清淨智慧”或“淨般若波羅蜜”)是指一种彻底超越名相执着、不为一切烦恼所污染的无漏智慧。其本性如虚空般无所依,具有“难破能破,难观能观,难解能解”的金刚不坏特性。淨慧不仅体现在对万法实相的无所得观照上,更体现在与“清净方便”的辩证双运中,使菩萨能够“觀諸煩惱即是智慧”,在不坏一法、不成一法中具足一切佛法。

二、主要阐述

1. 三種淨慧与多重“三淨”观照

《大方等大集經》提出了“三種淨慧”及一系列“三淨”的深层观照。所谓“三種淨慧”,是指菩萨在得佛授记时,心无执着,达到“不見我想、不見佛想,及授記想”的无所得境界。在此基础上,淨慧延伸出多重“三淨”观照: - 一是不見我、眾生及正法; - 二是不見名、色、因; - 三是見一切陰、界、入悉入法陰、法界、法入; - 四是了知過去已盡、未來不生、現在不住; - 五是觀身如水月、觀聲不可說、觀心不可見; - 六是安住於空、無相、無願。 经中强调,若能作此无所得之见,方是真实之见。

2. 十二慧与二寂静、二种净

在“淨般若波羅蜜”的系统框架下,淨慧被具体化为“十二慧”,即对过去、未来、现在、有为、无为、一切世作、出世、辩才、实、世谛、第一义谛、以及诸众生利钝等十二种维度皆得“无碍”。这种智慧具有“难破能破,难观能观,难解能解”的特性。它包含“二寂靜”(知礙相寂靜、知無礙相寂靜)与“二種淨”(無覺淨、離諸見淨)。成就此净般若的菩萨,能够“觀諸煩惱即是智慧”,在不坏一法、不成一法中具足一切佛法。

3. 以“空”喻指淨慧本性

经中以“空”来喻指淨慧的本性。如偈颂所云,“說法無所依,此慧淨如空”。淨慧能断除结使与习气,了知法性常净,超越有无、行与非行等二边之见,在无所依中彰显其彻底的清净与无漏。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大方等大集經》(大集部·《大方等大集經》)中,论述法尘与根境时,具有鲜明的译词特征。经中在论述法尘与根境时: - 以“陰”指代“蘊”(如“一切陰悉入法陰”、“不依陰界入”); - 以“入”指代“處”(如“一切入悉入法入”、“不依陰界入”)。 这构成了该经论述淨慧时的独特名相基础。这种译词与后期译本中普遍使用的“五蘊”、“十二處”等名相存在明显差异,体现了早期译本的古朴风格。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 清淨智慧与清淨方便的辩证关系

淨智慧的核心在于“不為一切煩惱之所污染”,因其清净,故能“雖行諸有心無染著”。具体而言,菩萨若能见无我、众生、寿命、士夫,以及知众生下中上根,皆属于“慧”的范畴。此外,淨慧还体现在能受持一切佛法,并能广分别说、无障碍说、随乐而说;且在生生之处不失无上菩提之心,了知菩提心无住无根。 在行持上,“不取證者是名智慧,行三界者是名方便”;“觀一切法無有二相……是名智慧,若能如是等觀眾生不證涅槃,是名方便”。智慧与方便相辅相成,使菩萨既能安住于空性,又能广度众生而不落涅槃之缚。

2. 淨慧与烦恼的关系

通常认为智慧与烦恼对立,但在淨慧的最高境界中,“觀諸煩惱即是智慧”。淨慧虽能断除结使与习气,但它并非通过消灭烦恼来获得清净,而是了知烦恼本性即是智慧,从而在不坏一法、不成一法中具足一切佛法。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于三種淨慧与无所得: “不見我想、不見佛想,及授記想……見一切陰、界、入悉入法陰、法界、法入。”

2. 关于智慧与方便的辩证: “不取證者是名智慧,行三界者是名方便。”

3. 关于淨慧之空性: “說法無所依,此慧淨如空。”

4. 关于烦恼与智慧的圆融: “觀諸煩惱即是智慧……不壞一法、不成一法。”

By SutraAI-generated

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》論「淨慧」,以菩薩受記時的心境為核心場景,展開多層次的「三淨」結構,最終歸於「空無相願」與「此慧淨如空」。

一、淨慧的發生場景:經中敘述菩薩於受記成佛之時,「都不聞是授記音聲,亦無佛想,及授記想」,在此無所取、無所著的狀態下生起「三種淨慧:不見我想、不見佛想,及授記想」。此處淨慧並非一般認知層面的智慧,而是於最殊勝境(佛之授記)中仍能不見能受之我、不見所對之佛、不見授記之事,三輪體空即是淨慧的實質內容。經文緊接以「若如是見,即是真實見於授記」作結,表明淨慧與真實見同義,離一切想方為實見。

二、多組「三淨」的層遞展開:經文以「復有三淨」反覆鋪排,構成至少六組三法:(1)不見我、不見眾生、不見正法——人法俱遣;(2)不見名、不見色、不見因——超越名色因果之執;(3)見一切陰悉入法陰、見一切界悉入法界、見一切入悉入法入——將五陰、十八界、十二入統攝歸於法性;(4)過去已盡、未來不生、現在不住——三世不可得;(5)觀身如水月、觀聲不可說、觀心不可見——身口意三業如幻;(6)空、無相、願——三解脫門。六組三淨由人法二空,經名色、三世、身心,終歸三解脫門,層層深入,皆以「淨」為貫穿線索,而開頭總稱之為「淨慧」,可知此處「淨」與「慧」一體不二:慧之所以為淨,正以無所見、無所住故。

三、術語特色:本經用「陰」而非「蘊」(「一切陰悉入法陰」),用「入」而非「處」(「一切入悉入法入」),此為北涼譯經的慣用詞形,與玄奘系譯本以「五蘊」「十二處」立名不同。又經中「法陰」「法界」「法入」三者並舉,以「法」字統攝陰、界、入三科,顯示一切差別法終歸一法性,此為本經獨特的歸攝方式。

四、偈頌中的「慧淨如空」:另一處偈頌以「我淨眾生淨,智淨識亦淨,義淨文字淨,法淨界亦淨」起,將淨慧展開為遍一切法的清淨——從人我、智識、義理文字到法界,無一不淨。偈中又言「知法性常淨,而籌量三世,空無行非行,慧無行亦爾」,指出淨慧雖照見三世,而慧本身「無行」,無所造作。最終以「此慧淨如空」總收,將淨慧之體性喻如虛空:無能壞、無我人壽者、非物非無物,拔斷二邊見。此處「慧淨」與前文「淨慧」詞序互倒而義同,皆指智慧之清淨無染。

五、淨慧與斷惑的關係:偈頌言「斷不善及習,大士集諸善」,又列「斷集滅道句,法覺智慧句」,將淨慧置於四諦修證的脈絡中,表明淨慧非離事之空談,而是與斷集、證滅、修道相應的覺智。然而經文同時強調「說法無所依」,淨慧雖起斷惑之用,其體仍無所依、如虛空,不落有為無為任何一邊。

綜上,《大方等大集經》以受記時三輪體空為淨慧的典範情境,以多組「三淨」層遞鋪展其內容,以「慧淨如空」標舉其體性,以「陰」「入」等北涼譯詞呈現其名相系統,構成一部經內自足的淨慧論述。

十地經論T1522 · 釋經論部

《十地經論》論「淨慧」,主要從菩薩所具清淨智慧的內涵、功能及其在說法中所居地位三個層面而立說,呈現出與他經不同的獨特術語與分析架構。

一、淨慧與念堅——阿含中無疑之慧

論首以偈頌開展云:「念堅清淨慧,為十力淨心,無礙分別義,說此十地法。」明確將「清淨慧」與「念堅」並舉。釋文進一步解釋:「念堅者,受持顯說故,是菩薩於阿含中淨慧無疑故」,可知「念堅」即菩薩受持並顯說法義之堅固力用,而此力用之體性即為「淨慧」——菩薩於阿含中對法義不起疑惑的清淨智慧。本論所稱「阿含」,是對聖教法義之專稱,體與用之關係分明。

二、淨慧的雙重功能——為十力與為淨心

論中接著說明淨慧的兩層作用:一者「為十力」,為已入地之菩薩令得佛之力用;二者「為淨心」,為未入地者令得入於地、成就清淨之心。換言之,淨慧既是成就佛果十力之增上緣,也是令菩薩心行清淨之因。釋文又云「云何為入阿含無礙分別義?令受持十地法故」,可知淨慧亦是菩薩「無礙分別」十地法義之依據,能令聽者受持此十地法。

三、淨慧作為「善哉」之「所依」

論復以「善哉」讚歎說法者,將此善哉分為三義——所依、體性、果。其中「所依者謂淨慧」,意即說法者之所以能善說十地妙法,須以內在具足之淨慧為根本所依。次,「體性者謂說諸地未曾說法」,指能說前所未說之諸地法;「勝地者地挍量勝」,指十地法較量殊勝。「果者,謂具十力無障礙佛菩提」,則是說法究竟所成之果。三者之中,淨慧居於根本所依之位,是善說成就的先決條件。

四、淨慧與「無垢」——相對於三種垢染而立

論又以「無垢」讚歎說法,謂說法不違背法義;所謂違義之說則有三種垢染:「一者倒說,二謗如來,三誑聞者」。可知本論所說「淨」字,正與此三種垢染相對而立——唯有遠離顛倒、不謗如來、不誑惑聽聞者的智慧,方為清淨之慧。此從反面界定淨慧之清淨性,亦是本論獨到之處。

五、術語特色

本論所用術語有數處應予記錄:(一)以「阿含」稱聖教法義;(二)以「念堅」一詞表菩薩受持顯說之力用,並以「念堅——淨慧」之體用結構呈現二者關係;(三)以「所依、體性、果」三層架構分析「善哉」之義涵,顯示本論結構嚴密之風;(四)以「無礙分別義」一詞結合淨慧,表述菩薩對法義無障礙之分別能力。

總之,《十地經論》論淨慧,兼具體(阿含中無疑之智慧)、用(念堅、無礙分別)、果(十力、淨心、佛菩提)三個面向,並從說法之「善哉所依」與「無垢之反面」兩路,建立完整的清淨智慧觀。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》論及「淨慧」之原文極為簡要,僅以一句「淨慧隨行名對法,及能得此諸慧論」標舉其地位與歸屬。此句以「淨慧」為核心詞,而全句之論述重心,在於將淨慧安立為「對法」之名義所在。就本論原文可確指者,約有以下數端。

其一,本論以「淨慧」為「對法」之所指。句中逕稱「淨慧隨行名對法」,是以淨慧及其隨行者,直接得名為對法。換言之,本論並非泛論智慧,而是特就「淨」慧立名;「淨」之一字,正顯此慧非一般之慧,而為離染清淨之慧。本論所用術語即作「淨慧」,不作「般若」「智」等他稱,此為本經用詞之特徵,宜於歸一時錄存。

其二,本論不以淨慧孤立立名,而必兼舉「隨行」。原文「淨慧隨行」連稱,顯示淨慧非單獨一法,必與隨行之法俱起,而後合此二者,方名對法。是故本論之論述,兼攝淨慧之自體與其俱起之隨行,非獨取慧之一面。

其三,本論於淨慧自體與隨行之外,復以「及能得此諸慧論」一句,將能得此淨慧之諸慧與諸論,亦攝入對法之名中。由是觀之,本論所謂對法,實含二層:一者淨慧隨行,為對法之正體;二者能得此淨慧之諸慧論,為趣向、成就此慧之方便。二者以「及」字並舉,同歸對法之名。

其四,就術語形式言,本論以「對法」一詞統攝淨慧、隨行與能得之慧論,而不以「淨慧」逕代對法之全名;淨慧於句中居於被釋、被攝之位,對法方為總名。此與他經或以慧為究竟、或以智立名者,用詞層次自有不同,當各依本經原文並存,不於此強為歸併或判其高下。

綜上所引,本論對「淨慧」之論述,可一言以蔽之曰:淨慧與其隨行,名為對法;而能得此淨慧之諸慧諸論,亦攝屬對法。原文所及,止於此句之名義安立,別無更詳之分別解說可據,故本條但錄其原文所明者如是。

Related