Dharma · AI Companion

淨施

vimala-dāna

不染执著而行的清净布施。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

「不染执著」须借空观立足,完整教授在般若层之三轮体空(2);即空行施、假名不碍布施而施行圆满,至第三重(3)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What Concept Is This Addressing?

At first glance, "giving" or "charity" seems like the most straightforward act in spiritual practice. You have something extra, someone else is in need, and you hand it over. Yet, in everyday life, our acts of giving are often tangled up in subtle human transactions. We give to receive gratitude, to manage our own guilt, to build social capital, to secure a better future, or simply to reassure ourselves: *"I am a good person."*

In the *Māharatnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dà Bǎojī Jīng* 大寶積經), Mahayana Buddhism introduces a radical level of clarity to this practice: Pure Giving (*Jìng Shī* 淨施, or *Qīngjìng Shī* 清淨施).

Simply defined: **Pure Giving refers to the act of giving in which one thoroughly realizes the emptiness—the lack of independent, inherent existence—of the giver, the receiver, and the gift itself (the "Threefold Emptiness" or *Sān Lún Tǐ Kōng* 三輪體空). It seeks neither worldly rewards nor individual spiritual attainments, directing its merit solely toward Supreme Enlightenment (*Anuttarā-samyak-saṃbodhi*, translated in early Chinese texts as *Wú Shàng Zhèng Zhēn Zhī Dào* 無上正真之道) for the liberation of all beings.**

To truly understand Pure Giving, we cannot treat it merely as "generosity." We must see where it stands in the whole path of liberation: **It is the absolute standard of *Dāna Pāramitā* (布施波羅蜜, classically rendered as *Shī Dù Wú Jí* 施度無極—"the perfection of giving that reaches the boundless shore").** It marks the exact point where an act of ordinary moral merit transforms into an act of unconditioned wisdom.

To make this rigorous, Pure Giving is built on four distinct analytical dimensions, as mapped out in classical canonical scriptures:

1. The Ontological Basis: Threefold Emptiness (*Sān Lún Tǐ Kōng* 三輪體空)

True purity in giving is not a psychological trick of "pretending not to care"; it is grounded in a deep, direct realization of reality (*Śūnyatā* / Emptiness). The *sūtra* establishes that: * **The Gift (*Shī Wù* 施物):** Whether it is food, money, or shelter, it is impermanent, interdependent, and empty of inherent substance—"like a illusion" (*Huàn* 幻) or "like empty space" (*Xū Kōng* 虛空). * **The Recipient (*Shòu Zhě* 受者):** The person receiving the gift is equally an interdependent, illusory construct, empty of an unchanging self. * **The Giver (*Shī Zhě* 施者):** The "I" who is doing the giving is also a fluid collection of physical and mental factors, utterly devoid of a permanent, solid ego.

When the scripture states: *"Do not take giving as giving, nor receiving as receiving"* (*Wù yǐ shī wéi shī, wù yǐ shòu wéi shòu* 勿以施為施,勿以受為受), it means dismantling the rigid subject-object duality. As long as there is an "I" looking down at a "You" handing over "My property," the act remains trapped in ego-centered mechanics. Pure Giving occurs when all three spheres are realized to be empty and non-different (*Děng Wú Fēn Bié Xīn* 等無分別心).

2. The Direction of Intent: Renouncing Rewards, Aiming for Enlightenment

Pure Giving strictly regulates the *teleology* (the "why") of the act. The scripture explicitly divides what must be abandoned and what must be sought: * What is discarded: All desires for worldly return—wealth, beauty, reputation, or rebirth in blissful heavenly realms (*Deva* realms). Crucially, it also demands abandoning the subtle desire for lower spiritual fruits, such as the individual liberation of the *Śrāvaka* (Hearers) or *Pratyekabuddha* (Solitary Realizers). * What is directed: The entire virtue of the act is dedicated (*Parīṇāmanā* / 迴向) purely toward Supreme Enlightenment (*Wú Shàng Zhèng Zhēn Zhī Dào* 無上正真之道) to liberate all sentient beings without exception. It is a giving that seeks ultimate freedom without clinging even to the concept of Nirvana itself.

3. The Practical Framework: Purification Across Four Layers

To prevent Pure Giving from becoming a vague philosophical ideal, the canonical framework outlines specific operational layers: * **The Fourfold Purity (*Sì Shì Wéi Qīngjìng Shī* 四事為清淨施):** 1. *Physical Purity (*Shēn Jìng* 身淨):* Actions of the body are ethically sound, with precepts kept intact without breach. 2. *Verbal Purity (*Yán Jìng* 言淨):* Speech is honest, free from flattery, manipulation, or hidden motives. 3. *Mental Purity (*Xīn Jìng* 心淨):* The mind is clear of greed, resentment, or reluctance during the act. 4. *Essential/Intrinsic Purity (*Xìng Jìng* 性淨):* The inner nature aligns with wisdom, fundamentally free from self-referential delusion. * **Purifying Eight Items (*Yán Jìng Bā Shì* 嚴淨八事) & Abandoning Four Abodes (*Qì Sì Zhù Yè* 棄四住業):** Breaking through self-views (no view of a person, an ego, or a living soul) and casting off non-Dharma practices or narrow, self-absorbed spiritual paths. * **Sealing with Four Emptinesses (*Sì Shī Yǐ Fǎ Jiàn Yìn* 四施以法見印):** Confirming the act through internal emptiness, external emptiness, human emptiness, and the emptiness of the Path itself.

4. The Negative Definition: The 32 Impure Givings (*Sān Shí Èr Zhǒng Bù Jìng Zhī Shī* 三十二種不淨之施)

To leave no room for self-deception, scripture contrasts Pure Giving with 32 forms of "Impure Giving" or "Afflicted Giving" (*Ài Rǎn Zhī Shī* 愛染之施). Giving is declared *impure* if it is done: * Out of upside-down views (*Dǎo Jiàn Shī* 倒見施). * Merely to repay a past favor (*Yīn Bào Ēn Shī* 因報恩施). * Without genuine empathy (*Bù Āi Mǐn Shī* 不哀愍施). * Driven by sexual attraction or lust (*Wèi Sè Yù Shī* 為色欲施). * Out of fear, coercion, or anxiety (*Kǒng Bù Shī* 恐怖施). * To gain fame, praise, or social standing (*Wèi Chēng Yù Shī* 為稱譽施). * Accompanied by regret, stinginess, or irritation after the fact (*Shě Hòu Huái Rè Nǎo Qiān Liàn Huǐ Hèn Shī* 捨後懷熱惱慳戀悔恨施). * By ignoring the truly destitute and instead flatteringly giving to the rich and powerful.

The scripture offers a striking metaphor: **Afflicted giving is like planting seeds in a choked, barren wasteland (*Huāng Huì Zhī Tián* 荒穢之田)—the harvest will be miserably small. Pure Giving, rooted in wisdom, is like planting in fertile soil, expanding without boundaries.**


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To see how Pure Giving operates, let us leave ancient terminology for a moment and step into a scenario familiar to modern life: Supporting a junior colleague at work or donating to a crowdfunded community project.

Imagine you spend hours mentoring a younger teammate, sharing your key industry insights, or you make a substantial financial contribution to a local community cause. Let us track your mind through this event step by step:

Step 1: Catching the "Impure Givings" (*Ài Rǎn Zhī Shī*)

As you hand over your knowledge or money, subtle mental scripts begin to run: * *Giving for Praise (*Wèi Chēng Yù Shī*):* "I hope my boss notices how generous and supportive I am." * *Giving for Repayment/Transaction (*Yīn Bào Ēn Shī*):* "I'm helping them now so they owe me a favor when the next promotion review comes up." * *Giving with Later Regret (*Shě Hòu Huái Rè Nǎo Huǐ Hèn Shī*):* A day later, feeling stressed, you think, "Why did I waste three hours on them? I could have finished my own project." * *Flattering the Wealthy while Ignoring the Needy:* You readily offer your best resources to high-status executives while remaining cold or impatient to the office custodian or an entry-level intern.

The Canon’s Warning: Modern psychology often calls these "subconscious transactional motives." Buddhist scriptural analysis cuts deeper: these are *Afflicted Givings*. The moment a gift carries an implicit contract—"I give *this* to get *that*"—the act shrinks into a self-centered exchange.

Step 2: Practicing the "Fourfold Purity" (*Sì Shì Wéi Qīngjìng Shī*)

How do you shift this action toward Pure Giving? * **Physical Purity (*Shēn Jìng*):** You do not give stolen work, dubious resources, or help that violates ethical boundaries. * **Verbal Purity (*Yán Jìng*):** You do not mentor with condescension, nor do you brag publicly about how much you helped. * **Mental Purity (*Xīn Jìng*):** You give freely without lingering resentment, anxiety, or reluctance. * **Essential Purity (*Xìng Jìng*):** You check your core intention—is this helping them grow, or is it feeding your ego's need to feel superior?

Step 3: Landing in "Threefold Emptiness" (*Sān Lún Tǐ Kōng*)

Now comes the crucial insight where ordinary giving transforms into *Pure Giving*: 1. Emptying the Gift: The advice, time, or money you offer is not a static "thing" you owned. It is a temporary flow of information, energy, and cause-and-effect. You pass it along without gripping it as "my secret technique." 2. Emptying the Recipient: You do not view the junior colleague as a "weak, needy person" subordinate to you. You see them as a living, dynamic being, temporarily encountering a difficulty, fundamentally equal to you in potential. 3. Emptying the Giver: You observe the thought "Look at what a great mentor I am!" and let it dissolve. You recognize that your ability to help relies on your own past teachers, luck, and privilege. There is no solid "Hero-Self" performing the deed.

Where Modern People Get It Wrong: People often misunderstand "Threefold Emptiness" as emotional coldness or detachment—acting like a robot who hands over money with a blank face. That is an error.

Scripture explicitly states that Pure Giving must be done while *"harboring deep compassion for all beings within"* (*Wéi Zhū Zhòng Shēng Nèi Huái Āi Mǐn* 為諸眾生內懷哀愍). Warmth and empathy are fully present. What is absent is not *feeling*, but *clinging*. You care deeply for the person, but you do not hold them hostage with your expectations. If they forget to thank you, or even if they surpass you later, your peace remains unshakeable because you never gave in order to purchase control over them.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Modern life is saturated with algorithmically engineered transactionalism. Every click, tip, like, and favor is tracked, quantified, and monetized. Social media turns public goodwill into "engagement capital"; corporate culture often reduces human kindness to "networking and strategic alliances."

In such an environment, human relationships easily degrade into a series of covert ledger entries. We constantly keep score: *I texted them first last time; I bought dinner twice; I helped them move, but they didn't show up for my party.* This unstated accounting is a major source of modern burnout, resentment, and isolation.

Pure Giving acts as a radical psychological and spiritual sanctuary:

1. Freedom from "Generosity Burnout": Many caring people experience burnout because they practice "Afflicted Giving"—they give endlessly while secretly hoping for validation, change, or gratitude from others. When those expectations are unmet, exhaustion and bitterness follow. Pure Giving severing the expectation wire at the root. When you give with the realization of emptiness, the act is complete the instant it happens. There is no emotional debt left unpaid. 2. Deconstructing the "Savior Complex": In philanthropy, activism, and everyday helping, it is easy to slip into a patronizing "Savior Complex"—the giver assumes a stance of moral superiority over the receiver. By insisting that the recipient and the giver are equally empty of inherent status, Pure Giving restores absolute dignity to the receiver and humility to the giver. 3. A Dialogue with Modern Behavioral Science: Modern evolutionary biology and cognitive science note that human altruism often evolved through "reciprocal altruism" (giving to receive future cooperation). While this helped our ancestors survive, it also hardwired us for hyper-vigilance regarding "cheaters" and social debts. Pure Giving represents a deliberate cognitive step beyond evolutionary programming.

*(Note of distinction: While behavioral sciences can describe the brain mechanisms of empathy or social reward, they operate within empirical, relative frameworks. They cannot validate or invalidate the transcendent metaphysical realization of Śūnyatā or Supreme Enlightenment, which belongs to a different order of experiential wisdom.)*


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "Is Pure Giving just about giving money to temples?"

Clarification: No. "Gift" (*Shī Wù*) in Mahayana texts encompasses material wealth (*Cái Shī* 財施), the sharing of truth/knowledge (*Fǎ Shī* 法施), and the offering of protection or comfort (*Wú Wèi Shī* 無畏施). More importantly, whether a gift is "Pure" depends entirely on the state of the giver's mind and wisdom, not on the physical object or the institution receiving it. Giving a glass of water to a stranger with a mind free of self-clinging is Pure Giving; donating millions to a spiritual institution to buy prestige or heavenly insurance is explicitly listed as an *Impure Giving*.

Misinterpretation 2: "If everything is empty, doesn't that mean giving doesn't matter?"

Clarification: This is the classic trap of nihilism (*Kōng Xiàng* 執空). The sūtra uses the analogy of a "hallucination" (*Huàn* 幻) or "empty space". An illusion still appears and functions; suffering within an illusion still feels intensely real to the one experiencing it. Realizing that the giver, receiver, and gift are empty does not mean stopping the act of giving. Rather, it means giving without obstacles. Because you understand emptiness, you give more freely, precisely because you are no longer blocked by stinginess, fear of loss, or pride.

Misinterpretation 3: "If I don't seek rewards, does Pure Giving produce no merit?"

Clarification: Paradoxically, the opposite is true. Scripture notes that when you give seeking a specific reward (like wealth or praise), your desire acts as a small, tight container. You receive only the limited reward you wished for—and once consumed, it is gone. But when you perform Pure Giving without attachment to personal reward, dedicating it to boundless Enlightenment, the merit becomes as vast and uncontainable as empty space itself. You do not give *for* merit, but because the ego is removed, the act naturally echoes through the interconnected fabric of reality without limit.


Summary

Pure Giving (*Jìng Shī*) is not an unattainable ideal reserved for legendary figures in ancient texts. It is an immediate, daily practice of mental liberation.

Whenever you offer your time, money, patience, or skill to another human being, observe your mind. Catch the subtle desires for appreciation; drop the invisible ledgers; recognize that both you and the person before you are impermanent, interconnected sparks of life. In that momentary release of ownership and ego, your gesture—no matter how small—aligns with Pure Giving, transforming an ordinary world of commerce into a quiet space of awakening.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在《大宝积经》(宝积部·《大寶積經》)中,「净施」(或称「清净施」)是一个极为核心的修行概念。净施的核心要义在于,施者在行布施时,必须彻底超越世俗的功利心与执着心,了达施者、受者及所施之物三者的空性本质,即达到「三轮体空」的无分别境界。与此同时,净施要求修行者完全舍弃对世间名利、人天福报乃至声闻、缘觉等小乘果位的希求,将布施的所有功德,唯一指向并回向于无上菩提(经中译为「无上正真之道」)。这种布施不求回报,远离一切希愿与依着,是菩萨修行布施波罗蜜(「施度无极」)的最高标准。

二、主要阐述

《大宝积经》对净施的阐述极为系统,主要从空性本质、离相无求、修行框架以及反面界定四个维度展开:

1. 空性本质与三轮体空:经中指出,真正的清净布施必须建立在对空性的深刻体悟之上。施者应当了知,所施之物(如饮食、床座等)本质上是幻化的,前来接受布施的众生亦是幻化的,而施者自身同样是幻化的。当修行者能够了达这种平等无二的本质时,才可称之为「净施」。因此,菩萨在行施时,应当做到「勿以施为施,勿以受为受」,体悟到「所施如虚空,受者不可得,远离于身心」的道理。只有对施物、施者及受者「等无分别心」,布施的功德才能达到究竟圆满。

2. 离相无求与志求菩提:净施要求施者在心态上彻底远离对世间与出世间果报的贪着。在行施时,修行者不应求取妙色财宝,不愿感得天人趣的福报,不求世间的名誉声望,亦不求任何生死的果报。经中强调,布施时绝不作「吾当获福,望于帝释梵天人位」之念,不求成为国主豪尊,不贪羡五趣生死,甚至不求声闻、缘觉之乘,而是「用志求无上正真之道」,不望任何回报,唯以开度一切众生为期许。这种布施虽然指向涅槃,但其心无所依,远离了一切有所得的希愿。

3. 清净施的具体修行框架:为了规范和严净布施的实践,经中提出了多层次的修行框架。首先是「四事为清净施」,即「身净、言净、心净、性净」。其次,菩萨在布施时还需严净「八事」,包括不见吾我、不见有人、不见有寿等,以破除对自我的执着。其三,必须弃除「四住业」,即舍于非法、舍声闻意、舍缘觉法等,确保布施不偏离大乘轨道。其四,需远离「四事思想」,即常想、安想、净想、我想。最后,要以「四施以法见印」来印证布施,即内空、外空、人空、道空。修行者应当「发信心,为诸众生内怀哀愍,回向菩提遍净解脱」,如此方为真正的清净施。

4. 反面界定:三十二种不净之施:为了更清晰地界定净施,经中从反面列举了三十二种「不净之施」(又称「爱染之施」)。这些不净之施包括:倒见施、因报恩施、不哀愍施、为色欲施、恐怖施、为称誉施、怀疑惑施、舍后怀热恼悭恋悔恨施、求来世受报施,以及见到贫穷者不生哀愍、反而谄媚布施给富贵者等。经中将这些夹杂了烦恼与执着的「爱染之施」比喻为在荒秽之田中种植作物,其收成必然极少,无法获得广大清净的功德。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大宝积经》(《大寶積經》)中,对于「净施」这一概念的表述,呈现出特定译经时代的术语风格与译本特征:

1. 核心概念的异称:经中在阐述这一概念时,「净施」与「清净施」交替使用,两者在内涵上完全一致,皆指远离执着与染污的布施。 2. 大乘果位的独特译语:在表述菩萨所追求的终极果位时,译本并未普遍使用后世常见的「无上菩提」或「阿耨多罗三藐三菩提」,而是使用了具有早期汉译风格的「无上正真之道」。 3. 波罗蜜的译法:对于大乘佛教核心的「布施波罗蜜」,本经译本使用了「施度无极」这一古雅的译语,用以指代布施的圆满与彼岸之行。 4. 对立概念的表述:与「清净施」相对立的反面布施,经中除了使用「不净之施」外,还特别使用了「爱染之施」这一术语,用以形象地描绘因执着、贪爱、名利等染污心而行施的状态。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「爱染之施」(不净之施)的关系:两者是完全对立的布施状态。净施是无私、无执、回向菩提的,其功德如虚空般广大;而爱染之施则是夹杂了求报、名利、悭悔等染污心的布施,经中将其比喻为「荒秽之田」,其所得福报极其微劣。 2. 与「三轮体空」的关系:三轮体空是净施的理论基石与最高体现。只有当施者了达施者、受者、施物三者皆如幻化、等无分别时,布施才能真正摆脱能所对立,转化为清净的「净施」。 3. 与「无上正真之道」的关系:无上正真之道(无上菩提)是净施的终极指向。净施要求修行者不求世间与二乘的任何果报,唯一的目的就是将布施功德回向于无上正真之道,以此开度一切众生。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于三轮体空的空性体悟:「所施如虚空,受者不可得,远离于身心。」 2. 关于清净施的修行框架与志求菩提:「四事为清净施:身净、言净、心净、性净。……用志求无上正真之道,不望其报,唯欲开度一切众生。」 3. 关于净施的心态与爱染之施的对比:「发信心,为诸众生内怀哀愍,回向菩提遍净解脱。……若有行于爱染之施,如于荒秽之田种植,收成极少。」

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》論「淨施」,層次分明,由般若幻觀、菩薩行儀、反面遮遣三面展開,術語上「淨施」與「清淨施」互用,指涉同一概念。

一、以幻化平等為淨施之體。經中反覆以偈頌標舉:了知所施之物(食、座等)如幻化,受者亦如幻化,「了此平等時,乃名為淨施」。給侍之人與受者之心皆如幻化,施者能如是觀,即名淨施。更進一步,「勿以施為施,勿以受為受」,不取施相、受相,方名淨施。最終極則曰:「所施如虛空,受者不可得,遠離於身心,其施最清淨」——三輪(施物、受者、施者身心)俱不可得,是為「最清淨」。此組偈頌以「乃名為淨施」為固定結語,構成《大寶積經》論淨施最核心的表述形式。

二、以無慳無著為清淨施之行。善順菩薩拒受波斯匿王價值百千兩金之二衣,自陳「我既自身無慳悋心,亦令他人不生愛著,其有施者名清淨施」。此處淨施之義不在觀空,而在施者心無慳悋、不令他人起愛著,屬菩薩利他行儀上的清淨。經文又記菩薩受衣後令王轉施城中貧窮苦惱者,觸衣者狂者得心、聾者得聞,顯示淨施之功德迴向眾生而非自享。

三、以四淨、八事、四離為清淨施之目。經中明列「四事為清淨施:一曰身淨,二曰言淨,三曰心淨,四曰性淨」,從身口意及本性四維界定淨施。同段又說布施當嚴淨八事(不見吾我、不見有人、不見有壽、不見斷滅、不覩有常、不住三處、不見無處等),棄四住業(捨非法、捨聲聞意、捨緣覺法、遠諸倚著),離四事思想(常想、安想、淨想、我想),並以三事越諸罣礙(捨悕望、棄懷恨、離小乘)。此處術語用「清淨施」,且將淨施置於菩薩「施度無極」的脈絡中,強調「不望相報,唯欲開度諸不及者越于彼岸」,志性在道而無差特心。

四、以三十二種不淨之施為反面遮遣。經中對廣博仙人廣說「三十二種不淨之施」,逐條以「不名淨施」否定之。所遮包括:倒見施、報恩施、不哀愍施、為色欲施、施火中、擲水中、恐怖施、施五家、以毒施、施刀杖、殺害施、為攝他、為稱譽、為倡伎、因占相、求飾好、結朋友、不歡欣施、學工巧、因病施醫、先打罵後施、懷疑惑施、捨已熱惱悔恨、言受者後當為牛畜、言福報自受、臨死方施、令餘城邑知、懷嫉妬增上施、慕豪族求婚姻施、求男女雜緣施、念來世受報、不哀貧窮反施富貴、貪花果而施。經以「愛染之施」總括此三十二種,喻如種子種於荒穢田,雖生牙而花實少收。

五、清淨施之正面定義。經末結曰:「若發信心,為諸眾生內懷哀愍,迴向菩提遍淨解脫,得為清淨」。此與前述幻觀、四淨互為表裏:消極面遮三十二種愛染,積極面以信心、哀愍、迴向菩提、遍淨解脫四義成立清淨。

術語備註:本經「淨施」「清淨施」二形並用,偈頌中固定作「乃名為淨施」,散文敘述中多作「清淨施」或「不名淨施」;未見「檀波羅蜜」等音譯,而以「施度無極」稱布施波羅蜜。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》以「檀」為布施之總名,謂「檀名布施」,其體為「心相應善思」,或兼攝身、口業;須信、福田、財物三事和合,心生捨法,能破慳貪,方名為檀。於此總名下,論中將施判為「淨」與「不淨」二種,反覆對舉以明淨施之相。

不淨施者,論中廣列其目:為求財、愧人、嫌責、畏懼、取他意、畏死、令狂人喜、自恃富貴、諍勝、妬瞋、憍慢自高、名譽、呪願、解除衰求吉、聚眾、輕賤不敬等,凡以今世有漏事緣而施者,皆屬不淨。另一處更補入「畏失財故與」「無用故與」「親愛故與」「求勢故與」「求與貴勝齊名」等目。

淨施之正面定義,論中層層遞進。初層:「與上相違,名為淨施」,即「為道故施,清淨心生,無諸結使,不求今世後世報,恭敬憐愍」。次層細分為三:一者以淨心信因緣果報,敬愍受者,不求今利,但為後世功德;二者不求後世利益,但以修心助求涅槃;三者生大悲心,為眾生故,不求自利早得涅槃,但為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。第三層即以般若波羅蜜心行施,論云「欲行檀波羅蜜,當學般若波羅蜜」,謂般若力故能捨諸法著心,乃至捨吾我心,身及妻子視如草土。又云「行無漏、無相六波羅蜜,是時能具足;有漏、有相則不能具足」,有悕望心即非清淨施。

論中另有一處「淨施」用法屬律制語境:佛不聽比丘畜金銀寶鉢,然「若作淨施得用」,此處淨施指依律將物轉施以成如法受用,與上列心性義之淨施同名而異指。

論中屢以譬喻顯淨施功德:以「華瓔珞初成未壞,香潔鮮明」及「新花未萎,色好且香」喻淨心布施之鮮潔;以「券要,終無失時」喻淨施業報雖經無量世終不亡失。又引佛說「世有二人為難得」,其二即「在家白衣能清淨布施」。淨施為「趣涅槃道之資糧」,未得涅槃時則為人天報樂之因。

術語方面,本論以「檀」譯布施,以「淨施/不淨施」為固定對舉術語,以「結使」稱煩惱,以「悕望」稱有所求之心,以「券要」喻業報不失,皆為本論慣用詞形。

十住毘婆沙論T1521 · 釋經論部

《十住毘婆沙論》論「淨施」,主要從施者、受者兩方面之清淨與否來辨析布施之染淨差別,並結合施心之動機與煩惱染污來區分純雜。

一、淨施與不淨施之根本區別 論中以「非法求財施等垢」與「空等功德」為施之染淨分際。施若與非法求財等垢合,稱為「不淨施」;施若與空等諸功德合,則為「淨施」。「非法求財施等」被明示為「施垢」,施與垢合即成不淨施。

二、四種施之分類 論引《經》說,提出依施者與受者之善惡身口意業而分四種施:施者善、受者惡,名「於施者淨,不於受者淨」;施者惡、受者善,名「於受者淨,不於施者淨」;兩者俱善,名「於施者淨,於受者亦淨」;兩者俱不善,名「不於施者淨,亦不於受者淨」。此外貪、瞋、癡之斷與未斷,亦應如是分別。

三、三淨、三不淨之歸納 論將四種施攝為「三淨、三不淨」:施者有功德故「從施者施得淨」;受者有功德故「從受者施得淨」;施者、受者俱有功德故「從施者、受者施得淨」。反之,施者有罪、受者有罪、或兩者俱有罪,則施不淨。

四、應勤行之二淨 論中明示「不淨盡不行」,於三淨之中,菩薩應常精進行二種淨施:一者「施者淨,不於受者淨」;二者「共淨」。因菩薩「不期果報」,若期果報則必求受者清淨,落於「受者淨」一類。文中以「淨」定義為「施者、受者功德莊嚴,其心清淨」;「不淨」則指「施者有慳惜心」,並引佛說「慳為施垢」,強調慳為施之最重之垢。

五、淨施之具體行相 論中描述淨施之相:菩薩若為護持正法、瞻視病人而應時供施,心無有悔,是名清淨施;若不求果報、不分別應受不應受,唯以憐愍利益心而與,亦名清淨施。又以偈頌明:「若人悲心施,是名清淨施,不言是福田,不言非福田」;「若人行布施,無所為故與」為淨,反之「若人為果報,是名為出息」。故施已心無悔恨,乃至微小之福,皆趣向無上道。

六、術語特色 本論所用術語以「淨施」「不淨施」「施者淨」「受者淨」「共淨」為主,未見其他異名;其「淨」之判準,側重於施者功德莊嚴與心之清淨,而非僅以受者福田勝劣為標準,此為本論論述淨施之獨特側面。

Related