Dharma · AI Companion

戒具足

śīlasampad

戒行清净圆满而无缺犯。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

与布施锚点(行门 1→2)同型:戒学立于业果缘生,般若以三轮体空/无所得持戒作正面重释。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

When modern seekers encounter the concept of Buddhist precepts (*śīla*), they often picture a rigid list of archaic "thou-shalt-nots"—an externally imposed moral code meant to restrain behavior through guilt or social conformity. However, in the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (雜阿含經, T0099), ethical practice is framed not as submission to external law, but as Śīla-sampadā (戒具足)—the "fulfillment, perfection, or mastery of moral integrity."

*Śīla-sampadā* is a state of psychological and behavioral completeness. It serves both as the foundation for secular well-being and as the indispensable launching pad for ultimate liberation (*nirvāṇa*).


What This Concept Is Actually Saying

1. One-Sentence Definition

Śīla-sampadā refers to a practitioner's achievement of complete, flawless, and pure moral integrity; it is the fundamental bedrock for happiness in future lives for householders and the absolute foundation for ultimate liberation among monastic seekers.


2. The Core Architecture: Lay Foundations vs. Monastic Higher Training

The early Buddhist canon structures *Śīla-sampadā* across two complementary horizons: the lay household life and the monastic path of liberation.

``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ŚĪLA-SAMPADĀ │ │ (Mastery of Moral Integrity) │ └────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌──────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ 【LAY HORIZON: Householder Practice】 【MONASTIC HORIZON: Ultimate Liberation】 Part of the Four Accomplishments (四具足): The First of the Threefold Higher Trainings (三學): • Faith (信具足) 1. Higher Moral Training (Adhiśīla / 增上戒) • Moral Integrity (戒具足) <--- Five Precepts 2. Higher Mind Training (Adhicitta / 增上心 - Samādhi) • Generosity (施具足) 3. Higher Wisdom Training (Adhipaññā / 增上慧) • Wisdom (慧具足) │ │ │ ▼ ▼ • Refraining from Action • Protection of Sense Faculties (常守護諸根) • Psychological "Non-Delight in Harm" (不樂作) • Metaphor: The Impregnable Fortress (勇猛堅固城) ```

A. The Lay Horizon: The Five Precepts and Psychological "Non-Delight"

For householders, *Śīla-sampadā* forms one of the Four Accomplishments (四具足)—alongside Faith (*śraddhā-sampadā* / 信具足), Generosity (*tyāga-sampadā* / 施具足), and Wisdom (*paññā-sampadā* / 慧具足)—required to secure well-being in this life and favorable rebirths hereafter.

The structural components of lay moral mastery consist of the Five Precepts (五戒): 1. Abstaining from killing (離殺生): Refraining from intentionally taking life. 2. Abstaining from taking what is not given (離不與取 / 不偷盜): Refraining from theft or appropriating unoffered goods. 3. Abstaining from sexual misconduct (離邪婬): Refraining from unlawful or harmful sexual conduct. 4. Abstaining from false speech (離妄語): Refraining from lying, deception, or deceitful communication. 5. Abstaining from intoxicants (離飲酒): Refraining from intoxicating drinks and substances that cloud mindfulness and lead to heedlessness.

Crucially, the canonical texts add a profound interior dimension to these Five Precepts: "Non-delight in unwholesome action" (不樂作). True *Śīla-sampadā* is not merely the passive absence of transgression due to fear of punishment; it is the subjective cessation of taking pleasure in harm or deception. When the mind genuinely loses its taste for unwholesome deeds, moral integrity transitions from an awkward restraint into a natural state of grace.

B. The Monastic Horizon: Higher Training (*Adhiśīla*) and the Fortress Metaphor

For monastic monks (*bhikṣus*), *Śīla-sampadā* evolves into Adhiśīla (增上戒, "Higher Moral Training"), the first leg of the Threefold Training (*Adhiśīla, Adhicitta, Adhipaññā* / 增上戒心慧).

The *Saṃyukta Āgama* employs a striking canonical metaphor to describe this level of ethical mastery: The Impregnable Fortress (勇猛堅固城). Just as a fortified border city with deep moats and high walls protects a realm from invading bandits, higher moral training guards the practitioner’s sense faculties (*indriya-saṃvara* / 常守護諸根) day and night. By sealing the city gates of sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, and thought against the invasion of unwholesome mental states, *Adhiśīla* keeps the mind intact and safe from spiritual ruin.


3. The Unbroken Engine of Liberation

In early Buddhist soteriology, ethical behavior is not an end in itself, nor is it a puritanical ritual. *Śīla-sampadā* functions as the indispensable foundation within an integrated mechanism of liberation:

``` [Śīla-sampadā (戒具足)] ──► [Wisdom & Mindfulness (智慧善正受 / 內思惟繫念)] ──► [Extinction of Craving & Attachment (不樂欲想 / 超越色結)] ──► [Crossing the Flood / Great Wisdom (度難度諸流 / 成就如來大智)] ```

* Integration with Mindfulness and Wisdom: The text stresses that *Śīla-sampadā* must operate in conjunction with "thoroughly accepted wisdom" (智慧善正受) and "internal reflective mindfulness" (內思惟繫念 / 正念內思惟). Without mindfulness, ethical rules become empty formalisms; without wisdom, they degenerate into dogmatic attachment to rites (*śīlavrata-parāmārśa*). * Severing Sensual and Form Attachments: When pure ethics merge with reflective awareness, the practitioner develops a natural aversion to sensual obsessions (*kāma-saṃññā* / 欲想) and transcends bondage to material form (*rūpa-saṃyojana* / 色結). * **Crossing the Flood (*Oghataraṇa*)**: The canon repeatedly uses the image of the tempestuous flood (*ogha* / 洪流) or abyssal waters to represent the cycle of birth and death (*saṃsāra*). One who possesses *Śīla-sampadā* stands on solid ground. Unswayed by worldly corruptions—"neither bound nor abiding, unattached amidst pollution" (不繫亦不住,於染亦不著)—the practitioner crosses the impassable waters to achieve equal liberation (*sama-vimukti* / 等解脫) and the Great Wisdom of the Tathāgata (如來大智).


A Walkthrough in Everyday Life

To understand how *Śīla-sampadā* translates beyond monastic vows into modern existence, let us trace its dynamic mechanics through common contemporary settings: commuting, modern workplace dynamics, digital algorithms, and intimate relationships.

``` ┌─────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Modern Scenario │ Common Mismapping (Superficial Moralism) │ Śīla-sampadā Mapping (Internalized Mastery) │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 1. Digital Interaction │ "I didn't tweet a direct lie, but I │ Abstaining from false/deceptive speech (不妄語) │ │ & Social Media │ circulated clickbait to get views." │ + Inner Non-delight in deception (不樂作). │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 2. Modern Workplace & │ "I didn't steal office hardware, so I │ Abstaining from taking what is not given │ │ Corporate Ethics │ am ethical, even if I steal ideas." │ (不與取) + Guarding sense faculties (守護諸根). │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 3. Intimate │ "As long as I don't physically cheat, │ Refraining from emotional exploitation/misconduct│ │ Relationships │ manipulative micro-cheating is fine." │ (不邪婬) + Extinction of sensual obsession. │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 4. Stress, Drinking & │ "Drinking to blackout after work is fine │ Protecting the clarity of the mind (不飲酒) │ │ Decompressing │ because I'm off the clock." │ as a fortified wall guarding sanity (堅固城). │ └─────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ```

Scenario 1: The Social Media Feed and the "Clickbait" Trap

* The Situation: You are drafting a post or sharing news on social media. You realize that tweaking a headline into something sensationalized or outrage-inducing will dramatically boost your metrics, even if it distorts the truth. * The Mismapping: Manging ethics as mere legalese: *"I didn't technically lie, so I haven't broken any rule."* * **The *Śīla-sampadā* Mapping: The precept of Abstaining from False Speech (不妄語) paired with Taking What Is Not Given** (不與取 / taking people's attention under false pretenses). More importantly, *Śīla-sampadā* demands Non-Delight in Harm (不樂作). The moment you notice the internal surge of glee at manipulating people's anger for clout, *Śīla-sampadā* cuts through the mental impulse. You drop the clickbait, not out of fear of getting "canceled," but because your mind no longer takes delight in distortion.

Scenario 2: Corporate Ideas, IP, and the "Not Given" Principle

* The Situation: In a high-stakes corporate environment, a colleague casually mentions an innovative strategy over coffee. In the afternoon presentation, you pitch the idea as your own creation. * The Mismapping: Restricting theft strictly to physical objects: *"I didn't steal money or corporate hardware, so I am completely ethical."* * **The *Śīla-sampadā* Mapping: Early texts specifically use the term Adinnādānā**—"Taking what is not given" (不與取)—which is far broader than legal theft. Claiming intellectual credit, taking unearned recognition, or stealthily appropriating another's effort is taking what was not given. Practicing *Śīla-sampadā* means honoring boundaries naturally, recognizing that stealing another's intellectual labor springs from a impoverished, greedy state of mind.

Scenario 3: Commuting, Friction, and "Micro-Violations"

* The Situation: You are stuck in horrific traffic or on a crowded subway train after an exhausting workday. Someone cuts you off or bumps into you. Your knee-jerk reaction is to unleash verbal abuse, horn-blasting, or revenge driving. * The Mismapping: Believing that non-killing (不殺生) only applies to literal murder or physical violence. * **The *Śīla-sampadā* Mapping**: Non-killing at its core is the non-harming (*ahiṃsā*) of life. Spewing malice or wishing harm upon a stranger on the road violates the spirit of harming life. Here, the Fortress Metaphor comes into play: when the sight of a reckless driver hits your eyes, your sense-gates are breached. *Śīla-sampadā* acts as your internal guard post. Combined with reflective mindfulness (內思惟繫念), it catches the rising heat of anger before it turns into aggressive action.

Scenario 4: The Binge-Drinking Culture and Mental Clouding

* The Situation: After an agonizing week of overwork, your peers head to a bar to get heavily intoxicated to "escape reality." * The Mismapping: Viewing the prohibition on intoxicants (不飲酒) as an arbitrary religious taboo that restricts fun. * **The *Śīla-sampadā* Mapping**: Intoxicants directly erode mindfulness and self-awareness, leaving the "fortress gates" wide open for all other unwholesome actions (harsh speech, foolish decisions, emotional outbursts). *Śīla-sampadā* protects mental clarity as a priceless asset. Recognizing that clouding the mind sabotages your own peace, you refrain naturally—not out of prudishness, but to maintain an unshakeable, clear consciousness.


Why Modern People Need It

Modern society is suffering from a subtle, chronic psychological fatigue. We live in an era characterized by hyper-connection, algorithmic manipulation, and relentless cognitive overload. In this context, *Śīla-sampadā* is not an archaic moral straitjacket, but a sophisticated system of cognitive security and psychological conservation.

1. Reducing Cognitive Friction and Moral Anxiety

Modern psychology and neuroscience highlight the phenomenon of "ego depletion" and the heavy cognitive burden of deception. Maintaining lies, calculating hidden agendas, or navigating shady ethical grey zones requires immense subconscious processing power. Every act of deceit or aggression leaves behind a trail of psychological residue—guilt, paranoia, anxiety, and fear of exposure.

*Śīla-sampadā* radically simplifies mental life. By establishing an unassailable baseline of integrity, the mind experiences *avippatisāra* (non-regret / 無悔). Freedom from remorse generates a natural lightness of heart, providing the precise emotional stillness required for deep concentration and mental clarity.

2. An Armor Against "Algorithmic Capitalism"

Today's digital economy is explicitly designed to monetize human craving, outrage, and sensory addiction. Algorithms probe our sense faculties 24/7 to trigger dopamine loops.

The monastic metaphor of *Śīla-sampadā* as an Impregnable Fortress guarding the sense faculties (勇猛堅固城 / 守護諸根) offers an extraordinary blueprint for modern digital hygiene. Without ethical self-mastery, a person is entirely defenseless against algorithmic exploitation—constantly reacting to notifications, anger-inducing headlines, and compulsive shopping impulses. *Śīla-sampadā* provides the structural containment that allows an individual to regain autonomy over their attention and consciousness.

3. Ethical Grounding in the Age of AI and Emergent Complexities

As Artificial Intelligence and automation reshape society, traditional legal frameworks struggle to keep pace with new ethical dilemmas. When laws lag behind technology, external compliance is no longer enough to prevent harm.

Here, the internal criterion of *Śīla-sampadā*—specifically "Non-delight in unwholesome action" (不樂作)—becomes the ultimate inner compass. Whether designing automated algorithms, handling sensitive user data, or navigating modern power dynamics, an individual anchored in *Śīla-sampadā* evaluates actions not by "Can I legally get away with this?" but by "Does this action spring from greed, hatred, or deception?"


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "Is *Śīla* just a list of rigid social rules or puritanical morality?"

* Clarification: No. Classical Buddhist *śīla* is fundamentally different from commandment-based moralism. It is not dictated by a divine judge who dishes out retribution, nor is it designed to induce neurosis or shame. The word *śīla* carries the root meaning of "coolness," "habit," or "harmonious nature." * *Śīla-sampadā* is an organic technology for mental training. Ethical violations are understood as clumsy, ignorant missteps (*akusala*) that burn the mind with agitation and bind it to suffering. Practicing *śīla* is like avoiding hot coals: you refrain from stepping on them not because of a dogmatic rule, but because burning yourself is painful and foolish.

Misinterpretation 2: "If I don't commit extreme crimes like murder or physical theft, don't I already have *Śīla-sampadā*?"

* Clarification: Not necessarily. As detailed in the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, *Śīla-sampadā* requires two deeper dimensions: 1. Behavioral Precision: Extending basic rules to subtle forms of harm—such as "taking what is not given" (不與取) in speech, time, credit, or emotional boundaries; or avoiding subtle forms of false/deceptive communication. 2. Psychological Transformation (不樂作): A person might refrain from stealing simply because they fear going to prison, while secretly longing to embezzle money. That is basic restraint, not *Śīla-sampadā*. Mastery (*sampadā*) means the mind has seen through the absurdity of greed and harm so clearly that it genuinely takes no delight in evil deeds.

Misinterpretation 3: "Isn't morality just an elementary step for beginners that advanced meditators can transcend?"

* Clarification: This is a dangerous spiritual error known as "spiritual bypassing." In the early Buddhist framework of the Threefold Training (三學), *Adhiśīla* (Higher Moral Training) is never discarded or outgrown. * *Śīla-sampadā* is both the entry point and the continuous container for wisdom. As the canon explicitly states, it is precisely when *Śīla-sampadā* is integrated with reflective mindfulness (內思惟繫念) and wisdom (智慧善正受) that one is able to "cross the impassable flood" and realize "the Great Wisdom of the Tathāgata" (成就如來大智). An enlightened mind does not abandon moral integrity; rather, in an enlightened mind, moral integrity becomes completely effortless, natural, and non-referential (*anupādāna*).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「戒具足」(śīla-sampadā)是指修行者在持守戒律上达到圆满、无缺、清净的成就状态。在《雜阿含經》中,戒具足不仅是在家信众(优婆塞)积累后世福德、获得安乐的基石,也是出家比丘修持三学(增上戒、增上心、增上慧)的首要环节。它不仅要求外在行为的不犯,更强调内心对恶业的“不乐作”,并与正念、智慧紧密结合,是断除欲爱、超度生死洪流、成就无上大智的根本保障。

二、主要阐述

1. 在家修行层面的戒具足:对于在家修行者而言,戒具足是其安身立命、积累后世福德的关键。经中指出,在家之人若能成就“信具足、戒具足、施具足、慧具足”四法,便能获得后世的安乐。其具体内容为持守五戒,即不杀生、不偷盗、不邪婬、不妄语、不饮酒。此外,在优婆塞的修行标准中,戒具足要求远离杀生、不与取、邪婬、妄语、饮酒,并强调“不乐作”,即内心对这些恶业不生喜好与乐意。 2. 出家修行层面的戒具足:对于出家比丘而言,戒具足体现为“三学”中的“增上戒”。比丘在“增上戒、增上心、增上慧”三法中精勤修行,如同守卫一座“勇猛坚固城”,能够常守护诸根,不分昼夜、前后、上下地精进不懈。 3. 戒具足与解脱的关联:在修行实践中,圆满的戒律(“一切戒具足”或“净戒悉具足”)是通往最终解脱的决定性力量。首先,它必须与智慧、正念相结合。当修行者成就“一切戒具足”,并配合“智慧善正受”与“内思惟繫念”(或“内思惟正念”、“正念內思惟”、“如思惟繫念”),便能度脱生死的深渊与洪流。其次,戒具足能助修行者断除欲爱与色爱,使其“不乐于欲想”(或“不染此欲想”、“不乐于五欲”),并“超越於色結”(或“超度彼色愛”、“超色諸結”),令贪喜悉皆灭尽。最后,持戒圆满者能达到无执状态,在面对世间染著时“不繫亦不住,於染亦不著”,处于“無攀無住處”而不致溺亡;同时,“净戒悉具足”与“正念常寂静”相辅相成,能令修行者成就“等解脫”,最终获得“如來大智”。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《雜阿含經》中,关于“戒具足”及相关戒条的表述存在多种异译与术语特征: 1. 针对“不偷盗”的表述:在论述在家四法时,经文使用“不偷盜”;而在论述优婆塞成就时,则使用“不與取”。 2. 针对“三学”中戒学的表述:在论述比丘正行时,将戒、定、慧三学表述为“增上戒心慧”,其中以“增上戒”对应戒学。 3. 针对“戒具足”在偈颂中的异称:经中常以“一切戒具足” 或“淨戒悉具足” 来指代戒律圆满的境界。 4. 偈颂中配合修行的心念表述:在配合戒具足修行时,心念的专注有“內思惟繫念”、“內思惟正念”、“正念內思惟”、“如思惟繫念” 等多种微细的译名差异。 5. 欲爱与色爱的断除表述:对于断除欲爱,有“不樂於欲想”、“不染此欲想”、“不樂於五欲” 的不同译法;对于断除色爱,则有“超越於色結”、“超度彼色愛”、“超色諸結” 的表述差异。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“四具足”的关系:在家修行中,“戒具足”与“信具足”、“施具足”、“慧具足”并列,共同构成在家优婆塞成就后世安乐的完整框架。 2. 与“三学”的关系:在出家修行中,“增上戒”(戒具足)是“增上心”(定学)与“增上慧”(慧学)的基础。三者合称为“增上戒心慧”,是比丘防护诸根、抵御烦恼的“勇猛坚固城”。 3. 与“正念”、“智慧”的关系:戒具足并非孤立的道德约束,它必须与“智慧善正受”及“内思惟正念”等心智修行相结合,才能发挥断除欲爱色结、度脱生死洪流的终极解脱效用。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 在家四法与五戒:“何等為戒具足?謂優婆塞不殺生、不偷盜、不邪婬、不妄語、不飲酒。” 2. 优婆塞戒具足与不乐作:“云何優婆塞戒具足?謂優婆塞離殺生、不與取、邪婬、妄語、飲酒,不樂作,是名優婆塞戒具足。” 3. 三学与坚固城:“比丘於此三法勤隨修學……猶如世間勇猛堅固城……常守護諸根。” 4. 戒具足与解脱偈颂:“一切戒具足,智慧善正受,內思惟繫念,度難度諸流。不樂於欲想,超越於色結,貪喜皆已盡,不溺於深淵。” 5. 净戒与大智:“淨戒悉具足,正念常寂靜……等解脫,成就如來大智。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「戒具足」,皆置於在家修行者之德目序列中,與信、施(捨)、慧並列,構成優婆塞或在家善男子之完整行持。經中兩處論述各有側重:

一、四法框架下之戒具足。佛告婆羅門,在家之人有四法能令後世安、後世樂,即信具足、戒具足、施具足、慧具足。其中戒具足之定義為「善男子不殺生、不偷盜、不邪婬、不妄語、不飲酒」,以五條否定句式(「不……」)逐條列舉,結以「是名戒具足」作結。此處用語為「不偷盜」,屬較通俗之表述;施之對應面稱「施具足」,慧之對應面以四聖諦如實知為內容。

二、優婆塞五法框架下之戒具足。佛於迦毘羅衛國尼拘律園,為釋種摩訶男說優婆塞之信具足、戒具足、聞具足、捨具足、智慧具足。此處戒具足之定義為「優婆塞離殺生、不與取、邪婬、妄語、飲酒,不樂作」。值得注意的是:(1)用語上以「不與取」代替前處之「不偷盜」,此為律藏及阿含系統中更常見之術語形式;(2)句式由五個「不……」改為「離……」統攝五事,末附「不樂作」三字,強調非僅消極不犯,更含內心不樂為之主動離意;(3)此框架較前處多出「聞具足」一項,而「施具足」改稱「捨具足」,「慧具足」改稱「智慧具足」,顯示同一經中對在家德目之開合與命名並非完全固定。

三、術語形式之歸一記錄。本經論戒具足時,兩處用詞有異:前處作「不偷盜」,後處作「不與取」;前處以「不」字逐條否定,後處以「離」字總攝並加「不樂作」。二者所指為同一五戒內容,唯表述方式與術語選擇不同。此外,本經始終以「戒具足」三字為固定名目,未見「戒圓滿」「戒成就」等異稱。

四、定位與功能。兩處論述皆將戒具足定位為在家眾(善男子、優婆塞)之基本行持,而非出家梵行之增上戒學。戒具足與信、施(捨)、慧(聞)構成並列德目,功能上指向「後世安、後世樂」之果報,或作為優婆塞身份之完整條件。經中未就戒條逐一分別解釋,亦未涉及犯相、懺法或開遮,僅以總列方式標舉五事即結以「是名戒具足」,呈現阿含經簡要直說之風格。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》對「戒具足」的論述層次分明、體系嚴整,以多重因緣框架逐層界定戒之圓滿。

一、核心定義——四因緣名戒具足。論中明言:「由四因緣,名戒具足」,即於無餘罪不起毀犯、於有餘罪能悔除、於諸所犯能憶念、於無犯中不執有犯且於有犯中不執無犯;與此相違之四因緣則令尸羅壞,尸羅壞故依止尸羅所應生善皆不得生。此處以「尸羅」稱戒,並以有餘罪、無餘罪之區分及憶念、悔除之有無作為判準,是本論界定戒具足最直接的表述。

二、尸羅律儀圓滿之五因緣。論復以五因緣說尸羅律儀圓滿:不墜墮、能出離、不可訶、無穿缺、不知足。此五者將戒具足從消極的不犯推展至積極的出離與無厭足,顯示戒之圓滿不止於無過,更在能向解脫。

三、禁戒淨命圓滿之三因緣。具戒苾芻之禁戒淨命圓滿攝為所行圓滿、攝取圓滿、受用圓滿:所行圓滿謂遠離買賣乃至害縛斷截撾打等事;攝取圓滿謂遠離攝取象馬生穀等事;受用圓滿謂衣僅蔽身、食纔充腹便生喜足,於長物非時食等皆悉遠離。此從日常生活之身語行為具體落實戒具足。

四、性罪與遮罪之二分。論以「於性罪處能遠離故,名淨戒圓滿;於遮罪處能遠離故,名別解脫圓滿」,並說攝護諸根門等善法無間受持名善法圓滿。性罪、遮罪之對舉為本論統攝戒禁的術語框架,又依「聖所愛戒」及蘊等五種善巧與別解脫律儀安立世俗禁戒。

五、安住具戒與軌則圓滿。論說安住具戒謂「不虧身業,不虧語業,無缺,無穿」,並以威儀路、所作事、善品加行處所三方面說軌則圓滿,要求隨順世間、隨順毘奈耶,不為賢良正至善士諸持律者之所呵責。此將戒具足延伸至行住坐臥及一切日常所作之如法如律。

六、菩薩三聚淨戒與三種圓滿。菩薩所受淨戒攝為律儀戒、攝善法戒、饒益有情戒三類,三世菩薩皆具皆學。犯戒道中以瞋所起犯為重,非貪所起;菩薩愛憐有情增上力故凡有所作皆是菩薩所作,非作所作可得成犯。又說加行圓滿(於淨戒中行無缺犯、不數毀犯發露自惡)、意樂圓滿(為法出家、求大菩提)、宿因圓滿(昔修福善故資具無匱)三種圓滿。

七、利他門中之戒圓滿。菩薩一切門利行中,對犯戒有情「於戒圓滿殷勤勸導,乃至建立」,戒具足遂兼攝化他之義。又以「戒莊嚴圓滿」「戒塗香圓滿」喻戒之莊嚴與芬芳,皆以「於不善能捨、於善能修習」為實義。

術語方面,本論以「尸羅」為戒之通稱,核心概念徑稱「戒具足」,並用「淨戒圓滿」「禁戒淨命圓滿」「尸羅律儀圓滿」等多種複合表述;戒之缺損以「無穿缺」「不虧身業、不虧語業」描述,戒禁統攝則以「性罪」「遮罪」二分,菩薩戒則用「三聚」即律儀戒、攝善法戒、饒益有情戒。

Related