Dharma · AI Companion

像法

saddharmapratirūpaka

教法形似正法而证果渐少之期。AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In Buddhism's worldview of time and space and its blueprint of the path to liberation, the semblance dharma (像法, saddharma-pratirūpaka) is a core concept of profound admonitory significance.

Definition in one sentence: The semblance dharma refers to the specific historical phase in which, after the true dharma (正法, saddharma) has passed away, the Buddhist teachings circulate only in semblance, practitioners largely lapse into formalism, and the dharma gradually declines.

To understand the semblance dharma accurately, one must first dismantle the contemporary misconception that it is merely a "historical chronology." The essence of the semblance dharma is not a cold span of time but a living condition in which a teaching, as it circulates in the world, undergoes "qualitative change and alienation."

In the classical sūtras and śāstras, the transmission of the teaching is usually divided into phases: the true dharma, the semblance dharma, the final dharma (末法, saddharma-vipralopa), and so on. "像" (xiàng) means "resembling" and "imitating"; the semblance dharma is thus the "dharma of similitude" (相似之法). At this stage:

* The teaching still survives: the scriptures remain complete, the monasteries remain grand, the rituals remain elaborate, and relic (舍利, śarīra) veneration and dharma assemblies may even reach unprecedented splendor (as recorded in the *Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra* (《妙法蓮華經》, "Lotus Sūtra"): 「舍利廣流布,天人普供養」, *"the relics spread far and wide, gods and humans universally make offerings"*). * Actual practice collapses: those who can truly follow the teaching, sever delusion, and realize truth are extremely few (the *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* (《大般涅槃經》) states 「四道聖人悉皆涅槃」, *"the sages of the four paths have all entered nirvāṇa"*), and the saṅgha (僧伽, saṃgha) and the laity gradually lose the four pure attainments of "the aggregate of moral discipline (戒蘊, śīla-skandha), good destinies (善趣, sugati), realization of the fruits (果證, phala-sākṣātkriyā), and seeing the Buddha as he truly is (如實見佛, yathābhūtaṃ buddhadarśana)" (the *Mahāratnakūṭa-sūtra* (《大寶積經》)). * Form overflows while substance is alienated: outwardly it presents every appearance of Buddhism, but inwardly it has been filled with worldly desire, fame and profit, hypocrisy, and strife.

The sūtras and śāstras depict the characteristics of the semblance-dharma period with precision and depth:

1. Seeming to keep the vinaya, inwardly harboring greed and envy: the scriptures use 「似像持律」 (seeming to uphold the vinaya) to encapsulate the false appearance of practitioners in this period. Outwardly they wear the robe and appear to observe the precepts, but in fact they 「少讀誦經,貪嗜飲食,養無德身」, *"recite the sūtras little, crave food and drink, and nourish a body devoid of virtue"*; they show a virtuous and gentle exterior while their minds are filled with greed and envy — some even claim attainment without having attained, falsely declaring that they have realized the fruit of stream-entry (須陀洹, srota-āpanna) up to the fruit of arhatship (阿羅漢, arhat). 2. The saṅgha becomes deeply secularized and alienated: practitioners abandon the pure, desireless life of a renunciant (沙門, śramaṇa) and dwell in unlawful pursuits such as 「醫道、販易、親近女人」, *"medicine, commerce, and consorting with women."* They engage in astrology and divination (占相星宿), keep slaves and servants, hoard gold, silver, and precious goods, ply crafts and trades, and even distort the teaching to flatter powerful ministers and nobles. 3. Evil dharmas blaze while true upholders are rejected: because their minds are possessed by envy and hatred (瞋恚, pratigha), the corrupt monks (比丘, bhikṣu) of the semblance-dharma period are like "vicious dogs": when they see a pure practitioner who genuinely maintains a pure intention (淨意樂), is content with little, and keeps and proclaims the true dharma, they feel no joy but instead give rise to hatred, revile and insult him to his face, and slander his teaching as "not Buddhist" (非佛教). 4. The sublime dharma sinks into obscurity and the scriptures vanish: as the multitude hears little and does not believe, and those capable of teaching the dharma withdraw far away, the core sublime teaching becomes increasingly rare to hear. It even reaches the point where no one within the saṅgha has ever heard the very name of the Mahāyāna (大乘, mahāyāna) teaching; and finally, when the foundational scriptures (such as the *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* (《大涅槃經》)) sink into the earth, this marks the teaching's complete slide from the semblance dharma into utter extinction.

Regarding the duration of the semblance dharma, different scriptures give different accounts: the *Mahāratnakūṭa-sūtra* (《大寶積經》) states 「正法住世經五百歲,像法住世亦五百歲」, *"the true dharma dwells in the world for five hundred years, and the semblance dharma likewise dwells for five hundred years"*; the *Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra* (《妙法蓮華經》) mostly uses "minor kalpas" (小劫, antarakalpa) as its unit, with the semblance dharma usually equal in length to the true dharma (e.g., thirty-two minor kalpas, twenty minor kalpas), or a multiple of the true dharma and of one's lifespan. This variance in duration shows precisely that the survival of the dharma is by no means a rigid application of physical time, but depends on the attitude of later disciples toward the teaching: if disciples are not greedy for offerings, preach for the sake of nirvāṇa, and do not hoard impure goods, the dharma can "dwell long" (久住); conversely, if they lapse into formalism, quarrel among themselves, and falsely claim attainments, the dharma will "not dwell long in the world" (不久住世).


A Daily-Life Examination

Although the semblance dharma is a classical Buddhist concept, its essence is precisely this: "a noble spiritual system that, in the course of its transmission, is gradually formalized, packaged, and commodified, until it loses the penetrating power to transform life that it had at the outset." In the daily life and cultural experience of contemporary people, we are constantly undergoing this examination of "semblance-dharma-ization" (像法化).

1. The "Semblance-Dharma-ization" of Knowledge and Spiritual Cultivation

* Classical mirror: wearing the robe, seeming to keep the vinaya, reciting the sūtras little, outwardly virtuous, inwardly filled with greed and envy. * Contemporary scene: modern people check in at "meditation retreats," buy meditation cushions, decorate their living rooms as silent tea rooms, and post photos of copied sūtras and pithy sayings on social media. * Precise examination and common pitfalls: * False mapping: believing that once you have bought all the meditation gear, learned the Buddhist vocabulary, and dressed in plain-colored clothes, you are putting Buddhist wisdom into practice. * True mapping: this is precisely the classic "seeming to keep the vinaya." The form is extremely lifelike (像, semblance), but the mind (實, substance) has not changed at all in its clinging to fame, profit, anxiety, and envy. You are using "zen atmosphere" (禪意) to package your elite persona and nourish that proud "body devoid of virtue" (無德身). When genuine affliction arrives — being berated by your boss, betrayed by your partner — those zen symbols collapse in an instant, and the mind still blazes with hatred.

2. The Erosion of the Teaching by Instrumentalization and Pragmatism

* Classical mirror: dwelling in medicine, commerce, astrology and divination, sorcery and incantation, flattering and cultivating kings and ministers, hoarding treasure. * Contemporary scene: reducing the dharma, or any mind-body discipline, to a tool for seeking wealth, securing safety, curing insomnia, or getting promoted and rich; or using AI and neuroscience to "polish" meditation, turning it into an "energy-management tool" for raising workplace efficiency and pushing one's limits. * Precise examination and common pitfalls: * False mapping: thinking that as long as you use meditation or Buddhist ideas in your life, the dharma is at work. * True mapping: the core of the dharma is liberation (解脫, vimokṣa) — severing greed, hatred, and delusion, and breaking through self-clinging — and reducing it to a tool for divination, wealth, or workplace efficiency is exactly the "commerce and crafts" (販易與工巧) that the scriptures condemn so sharply. You have taken the compass meant for escaping the prison and turned it into a comfortable massage chair inside the prison.

3. Bad Money Drives Out Good: The Rejection of Truth

* Classical mirror: corrupt monks are like vicious dogs: when they see someone who firmly upholds the true dharma and is content with little, they burn with vexation, revile him to his face, and slander his teaching as "not Buddhist." * Contemporary scene: in the algorithm-driven arena of online opinion, profound and serious insight that demands the price of real practice attracts no audience, while chicken-soup platitudes and pseudo-doctrines that pander to mass anxiety, offer emotional comfort, and preach "get rich quick / instant enlightenment" run rampant. * Precise examination and common pitfalls: * True mapping: when a rigorous teaching genuinely asks you to face your inner darkness and cut back your desires, people who have grown accustomed to their "comfort zone" feel offended instead, and attack it en masse, calling it "negative," "outdated," or "pseudo-learning." This corresponds perfectly to the envy and rejection directed at pure upholders of the dharma in the semblance-dharma period.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Reading the semblance dharma clearly is by no means an occasion for sighing over the decline of history; rather, we need this mirror to rescue our spiritual life from being buried beneath false forms.

1. Breaking the self-deception that "form equals piety" In an age of information explosion compounded by consumerism, the easiest thing to manufacture is the "illusion of resemblance." You can easily subscribe to ten Buddhist courses, join all kinds of mind-training communities, and purchase exquisite ritual implements. But the concept of the semblance dharma coldly reminds us: the flourishing of symbols is often the beginning of substantive impoverishment. Without a genuine piercing through of inner affliction, even the most perfect ritual is merely another disguise for worldly desire.

2. Guarding against the "instrumentalist reduction" of the spiritual domain Contemporary neuroscience and AI technology can precisely measure brain waves during meditation (such as alpha waves and beta waves), and can even use algorithms to design soundscapes that most easily induce a relaxed state. Yet this very capability invites a limitation: science can measure meditation as a physiological regulatory technique that "lowers cortisol and enhances attention," but science cannot yet define what "no-self" (無我, anātman) is, or what "great compassion" (大悲, mahākaruṇā) is. If contemporary people content themselves with these scientifically verified physiological effects, they will reduce the unsurpassed wisdom originally pointing toward complete liberation into an advanced form of mental-health calisthenics. Understanding the warning of the semblance dharma allows us, while drawing on contemporary technology and neuroscience, to see their limits clearly and to hold fast to the core liberative aim of the teaching.

3. Providing a profound perspective on the decline of culture and civilization Any great system of thought — whether Buddhism, philosophy, or some form of idealism — is filled with the power to strike the heart directly at its birth (the true dharma); but as time passes, it is inevitably institutionalized, industrialized, and labeled, and eventually becomes an empty shell (the semblance dharma). Once one understands the semblance dharma, contemporary people can remain clearheaded in a complicated world, refuse to blindly follow any "lofty" concept dressed up in formal packaging, and go straight to the core to test whether it can genuinely bring inner purity and freedom.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

* Misreading One: The semblance dharma is an irreversible physical-historical chronology; we can only passively await the extinction of the dharma (法滅, saddharma-antardhāna). * Clarification: the temporal statements in the scriptures (such as five hundred years, thirty-two kalpas) are probabilistic descriptions based on the collective karma (共業, sādhāraṇa-karman) of sentient beings, not iron laws of fatalism. The *Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* (《大般涅槃經》) states explicitly that the "long dwelling" and "not long dwelling" of the dharma depend entirely on the practice attitude of later disciples. If people can be free of greed for offerings, refrain from falsely claiming attainments, respect one another, and practice earnestly, the spirit of the true dharma can be revived in the present moment; conversely, even if one lives within the time-frame of the true dharma, without real practice one is personally still within the semblance dharma or even the final dharma.

* Misreading Two: The semblance-dharma period means that the scriptures and monasteries have all disappeared. * Clarification: on the contrary. The defining feature of the semblance-dharma period is "immense abundance of form, extreme poverty of substance." Scriptures may be extremely widespread, relic offerings and monastery construction may flourish as never before (「舍利廣流布,天人普供養」, *"the relics spread far and wide, gods and humans universally make offerings"*), but the key point is that 「四道聖人悉皆涅槃」, *"the sages of the four paths have all entered nirvāṇa"* — those who can truly cut off affliction and realize the fruits according to the scriptures are extremely rare. One must not mistake external splendor for the flourishing of the teaching.

* Misreading Three: Since practice and realization are so difficult in the semblance-dharma period, ordinary people only need to go through the motions and bow to the Buddha; there is no need to insist on real practice. * Clarification: after displaying the decaying scene of the semblance dharma, the *Mahāratnakūṭa-sūtra* (《大寶積經》) gives its ultimate exhortation not as passive resignation but as 「速發精勤」, *"swiftly arouse diligent effort."* Precisely because one dwells in an environment where the dharma is weak, demons are strong, and semblance-teachings fill every shelf, the opportunity to hear the truth is extremely brief and precious (「聽聞當不久」, *"the hearing of it will not last long"*). Understanding the truth of the semblance dharma should ignite in contemporary people a fierce diligence that breaks through false forms and strikes directly at the essence of life — not serve as an excuse for retreat.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

像法(saddharma-pratirūpaka)是指在佛陀涅槃、正法时期结束之后,佛教教法呈现相似流传,但修行者证果日渐稀少、僧团逐渐世俗化与异化的特定历史阶段。在此阶段,虽然仍有经典与教法流传,但众生多流于形式,缺乏实修,最终导致正法彻底隐没。

二、主要阐述

综合各经论述,像法时期的特征主要表现在以下几个维度: 1. 时间跨度与比例关系:在诸佛授记中,像法时期的长短通常与正法时期紧密相关。在《妙法蓮華經》中,多数情况下像法与正法住世时间相等(如华光佛、光明佛等正法与像法皆为三十二或二十小劫);但在部分授记中,像法时间倍增于正法或寿命(如普明佛、山海慧自在通王佛等)。而在《大寶積經》中,亦有“正法住世经五百岁,像法住世亦五百岁”的对等表述。 2. 僧团异化与戒律废弛:像法时期最显著的表征是出家众的虚伪与堕落。修行者呈现出“似像持律”的虚假面貌,极少读诵经典,贪图饮食,外现贤善而内怀贪嫉。他们退失了“戒蕴、善趣、果证、如实见佛”四种清净成就。僧侣高度世俗化,不仅积攒生谷、接受鱼肉、亲自生火,还从事占相、医道、蓄养奴婢、囤积财宝及各种工巧技艺。甚至出现“畜一切不净之物”却妄称证得须陀洹果至阿罗汉果的现象。 3. 恶法炽盛与排斥持法者:此时期比丘嫉妒、瞋恚等恶法炽盛,听闻深经反而堕于谤法、毁谤别解脱戒等恶业中。他们如同“恶狗”般嫉恨、毁辱坚守净意乐、持说正法的清净比丘,诽谤其所说“非佛教”。 4. 经典消亡与法门罕闻:随着众生少闻无欲乐,能说法者远离,佛之微言渐当隐没。在像法时期,甚至会出现僧团内部完全不闻大乘法门名字的情况。最终,当大乘核心的《大涅槃经》流传至罽宾并潜没地中时,其余一切大乘经典也将随之灭没,标志着正法的彻底消亡。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

各经在论述“像法”及相关概念时,其术语形式与用词存在明显差异: 1. 像法时期的特征概括:《大般涅槃經》使用“似像持律”来精准概括僧人徒具形相、不实修戒律的特征;而《大寶積經》则侧重于描述比丘退失“戒蕴、善趣、果证、如实见佛”四种清净成就,并住于“医道、贩易、亲近女人”三种非法之中。 2. 时间计量单位:《妙法蓮華經》在描述像法时间跨度时,统一使用“小劫”或“劫”作为计量单位;而《大寶積經》则使用“岁”(如“五百岁”)来表述。 3. 比例关系表述:《妙法蓮華經》使用“倍寿”、“倍正法”、“复倍是”以及“同等”、“无有异”等词汇来表达像法与正法、寿命之间的比例。 4. 修证阶位与身份称谓:《大般涅槃經》使用了“四道圣人”指代证果圣者,“白衣檀越”称呼虔诚的在家施主,并以“须陀洹果”至“阿罗汉果”表述声闻乘修证阶位;而《大寶積經》则使用“法行苾芻”等称谓。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“正法”的关系:像法紧接于正法之后。在《妙法蓮華經》中,像法时期的长短多与正法相等或成倍数关系。正法灭尽后,像法时期佛陀的舍利将广为流布并受天人供养。 2. 与“正法灭时/法灭”的关系:像法是正法趋于灭尽的过渡阶段。在《大寶積經》中,“正法灭时”伴随着比丘退失清净成就、恶法炽盛等现象。而《大般涅槃經》指出,当《大涅槃经》在像法时期隐没于地中时,即标志着正法与大乘经典的彻底灭尽。 3. 与“久住于世”的关系:佛法的久住与否取决于弟子的修行态度。若弟子不贪利养、为求涅槃而演说、不积蓄不净之物、不妄言证果,则佛法能“久住不灭”;反之,若出现像法时期的种种乱象,佛法便“不久住世”。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《大寶積經》:“正法住世经五百岁,像法住世亦五百岁。” 2. 《妙法蓮華經》:“正法灭尽已,像法三十二,舍利广流布,天人普供养。” 3. 《大般涅槃經》:“我涅槃后无量百岁,四道圣人悉皆涅槃。正法灭后,于像法中,实非沙门,自称沙门……似像持律,少读诵经,贪嗜饮食,养无德身。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對像法之論述,係由佛陀答覆摩訶迦葉之問而展開。迦葉見佛陀初為聲聞少制戒時,比丘多樂習學,今多制戒而少樂習學,乃就此因緣請問。佛陀先以「命濁、煩惱濁、劫濁、眾生濁、見濁」五濁之理,說明眾生善法退減之因,繼而引出正法與像法消長之辨。

此經以「相似像法」一詞標示像法之概念。經中以劫末之喻闡述:如劫欲壞時,真寶未滅,有諸相似偽寶出於世間;偽寶出已,真寶則沒。如是,如來正法欲滅之時,有相似像法生;相似像法出世間已,正法則滅。此處以「真寶」喻如來正法,以「相似偽寶」「相似像法」喻像法,凸顯像法之特質在於其「相似」——形似正法而非正法本身。

此經另以大海船載珍寶之喻,區別正法之滅與非法之滅:船載珍寶則頓沈沒,而如來正法則不如是,是漸漸消滅。此「漸漸消滅」之說,揭示像法之興起乃漸次之過程,並非驟然取代正法。經文復強調正法之滅,不為地、水、火、風四界所壞,而因「惡眾生出世,樂行諸惡、欲行諸惡、成就諸惡」,致令非法言法、法言非法、非律言律、律言非律,以「相似法、句味熾然」之方式,使如來正法於此消沒。此處之「相似法」與前文「相似像法」相呼應,皆指以形似之面貌混淆、取代正法。

經末揭示令如來正法沈沒之「五因緣」,及令如來法、律不沒、不忘、不退之「五因緣」:以比丘於大師所及於法、學、隨順教、諸梵行等,是「恭敬尊重、下意供養、依止而住」或「不敬不重、不下意供養、依猗而住」為準繩。此二組五因緣之對舉,從人事因緣之層面補足了像法得以興起之條件,顯示正法之滅並非無因,乃基於比丘於師於法不行恭敬之所致。此處以「法、律」並稱,可見像法之滅涵蓋教法與律儀兩方面。

此經於論及像法之際,所運用之主要術語為「相似像法」「相似法」「偽寶」等,並以五濁、五因緣之架構呈現像法之背景與條件。經文未對像法作獨立之義理定義,而是將其置於正法消長之整體脈絡中加以說明;其用詞側重「相似」之意涵,恰與像法「教法形似正法」之面相相契。

妙法蓮華經T0262 · 法華部

本經(姚秦鳩摩羅什譯《妙法蓮華經》)論「像法」之文,皆見於佛為弟子授未來成佛之記,以「佛壽—正法—像法」三期並列之固定句式呈現,未另作獨立義理之敷演。

經中所用術語一貫為「像法」二字,未見異譯或別稱;其於概念所指「教法形似正法而證果漸少之期」之義理,則以時序配比及教法流布之外緣間接顯示。具體而言,授華光佛滅後之情形云:「正法住世三十二小劫,像法住世亦三十二小劫」;偈中復云:「正法滅盡已,像法三十二,舍利廣流布,天人普供養」。此段最為直接顯示「像法」之時序特徵——正法滅盡已後,像法方起,期間舍利廣布、天人普供,至於證果則未言及,正合「形似正法而證果漸少」之義。

其後授摩訶迦葉記,云「正法住世二十小劫,像法亦住二十小劫」;其偈亦云「正法住世二十小劫,像法亦住二十小劫」。授須菩提記,亦云「正法住世二十小劫,像法亦住二十小劫」;其偈亦云「像法亦住二十小劫」。授大迦旃延記,則言「正法住世二十小劫,像法亦住二十小劫」。授大目犍連記,則云「正法住世四十小劫,像法亦住四十小劫」;其偈復云「像法亦爾」。此數例皆以像法時長等同正法時長,未嘗別加義理說明,僅作為授記內容之要素與國土莊嚴、弟子數等並列。

另有一類表述,以倍數關係呈現像法之長短。授憍陳如記云:「佛壽六萬劫,正法住倍壽,像法復倍是」,即正法倍於佛壽,像法復倍於正法。授阿難記亦云:「正法住世倍於壽命,像法住世復倍正法」;偈中復云「正法倍壽命,像法復倍是」。此以數字倍乘,明像法之時序居於正法之後,愈見其教法流轉之遞降趨勢。

此外,於羅睺羅之授記中云「正法、像法……亦如山海慧自在通王如來無異」;授學無學二千弟子記,則云「正法、像法皆悉同等」;其偈云「國土及弟子,正法與像法,悉等無有異」。顯示「像法」一詞已成為描述佛陀教法流布期之固定範疇,與國土莊嚴、聲聞菩薩之數並列為授記之要素。

綜合而言,本經論「像法」純以時序框架呈現,未獨立敷演其義理內容;術語一貫用「像法」而無別譯;其與正法之關係,或「亦爾」(時長相等),或「復倍是」(後者倍於前者),皆表明像法乃正法滅後之另一階段,教法形似而無實證之漸衰之期,此即本經對此概念之獨特側面。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《寶積部·大寶積經》論述「像法」之文,以正法、像法二期的對舉為其核心結構。此處「像法」與「正法」並提,指佛陀般涅槃後教法住世之分位。《大寶積經》明確指出:「彼佛壽量滿八十歲便般涅槃,正法住世經五百歲,像法住世亦五百歲,舍利流布」。經文以此對偶式的年數表明,像法之期與正法等量齊觀,皆為教法住世之階段,並非教法已滅之末法。此為《寶積部·大寶積經》論像法的基本框架。

就概念之內涵而言,此經並非泛論像法之義理,而是藉由描述他方世界某一佛陀入滅後的情形帶出此概念。經云彼佛壽量八十歲,涅槃後正法與像法各住五百歲,舍利流布。此處將「佛壽量」、「正法住世」、「像法住世」、「舍利流布」四事並列,顯示像法乃緊隨正法之後的一個教法住世階段,其特徵在於教法形貌猶存而修行證量漸次減少。此即「像法」之基本義涵——教相尚存而力用漸薄,期滿則轉入末法。

從文脈觀之,像法之期內舍利仍流布於世,供養舍利之事亦於此期內繼續發生。經云如來涅槃後,「供養舍利當流布相」即在此期之內。此表明像法並非法滅之時,教法之蹤跡仍可追尋,舍利供養之相猶存。

更值得留意者,此經以法行菩薩之出世作為像法期之標誌性事件。經文詳述:佛滅後將滿百年時,有一菩薩從他方界終,生此世界大王之家,初生即唱「奇哉!今者生非法處」、「我於今者當行法行」,眾人因而號之為「法行」。法行王子長大後出家,獨處靜室,虛空天神告以當勤求大菩薩藏微妙法門。其後法行苾芻展轉尋訪大菩薩藏法門,遍歷村城王都國邑乃至亭館,「了無所得」;乃至往諸僧坊問於苾芻苾芻尼,亦皆言初未嘗聞此法門之名。法行自念:「如是法門諸佛妙法,不應天神妄有所說」,遂發勇猛精進。

此段敘事揭示了像法期之獨特面貌:正法之時菩薩藏法門住世修行者眾,像法之時則此微妙法門隱沒不聞,雖有大心菩薩亦須經歷「了無所得」之困境方能值遇。此即《寶積部·大寶積經》對像法概念之獨特側面——以法行菩薩尋法之艱難為像法期的具體寫照,從側面凸顯像法期教法形似猶存而證果漸少的特質。

就術語而言,此經使用「像法」、「正法」二詞對舉,未見其他異名異稱。「住世」二字用於描述此二期之延續,表明像法是一段教法仍住於世間的時期,與後世所謂「末法」之概念不同。此經所述「像法住世亦五百歲」一句,確立了像法期五百年的時量框架,為該概念在《寶積部·大寶積經》中之核心表述。

Related