Dharma · AI Companion

羅剎

rākṣasa

佛典中具威力的食人鬼类AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In modern popular culture, the "rākṣasa" (羅剎) is often portrayed as a hideous, purely evil monster. Yet in the Buddhist cosmology and the soteriological system of liberation, the 羅剎 (rākṣasa) is by no means a flat evil backdrop—it is a class of non-human beings bearing profoundly deep "dual characteristics" and "existential tension."

To understand the rākṣasa precisely, one must grasp the two core stages of its classical definition:

1. Before Conversion: Extreme Violence, Cannibalism, and Imprisonment

Before being converted by the Dharma, the rākṣasa nature is extremely violent and cruel, living by devouring human flesh and blood. Classical scriptures (such as the *Madhyama Āgama* 《中阿含經》) give an extremely strict and thorough definition of the rākṣasa's brutal conduct: * Disguise and deception: They often manifest as beautiful, alluring women, specifically luring merchants of Jambudvīpa (閻浮洲) who have been shipwrecked at sea. They dwell with them and offer them comfort—a "warm nest" on the surface, but in truth for the sake of imprisonment and devouring. * Extreme cannibalism: A rākṣasa devouring humans is no ordinary hunting—it is "consumption taken to its utmost." The scriptures record that when they eat people, they consume even the remaining hair, fur, nails, and teeth; when drops of blood fall on the ground, they even dig with their claws to a depth of four inches, scooping up the bloodstained soil and swallowing it as well. * Imprisonment in the Great Iron City: Shipwreck victims who are not immediately devoured are locked inside the "Great Iron City" (大鐵城) at the north of the city, whose gate is invisible to them. There they weep in despair, awaiting the fate of being consumed.

2. Karmic Cause, Repentance, and Transformation into Dharma Protectors

Mahāyāna scriptures (such as the *Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra* 《大方等大集經》) reveal the deep karmic causes and the mechanism of transformation behind this form of life: * The fatal karmic cause (業因): Rākṣasas are not demons that arise from nowhere. For instance, the rākṣasa king "Bull-Eye" (牛王目) and his ten thousand rākṣasas were, in a previous life, ordained monks (比丘, bhikṣu) who recited and upheld the Dharma of both the Mahāyāna (大乘) and the śrāvaka (聲聞) vehicle, and had even aroused bodhicitta (菩提心, the aspiration for awakening). But merely because they gave rise to an extremely fierce anger toward practicing monks dwelling in a hermitage (阿蘭若, araṇya, a place of solitude), after death they first fell into hell (地獄, naraka), and once their retribution was exhausted, they were reborn as "evil rākṣasas who devour the flesh and blood of others." "Though practitioners may have great aspirations, if they harbor hatred toward fellow practitioners, they too can fall and become violent rākṣasas"—this is an extremely stern warning on the path of liberation. * Utmost sincere repentance and dietary transformation: After hearing the Buddha's teaching, the assembly of rākṣasas, empowered by the Buddha's spiritual power, recollected their past lives, felt deep remorse, and repented with utmost sincerity before the Buddha. The Buddha conferred upon them the prophecy of future awakening (授記, vyākaraṇa)—that they would obtain the prophecy of supreme bodhi at the time of the future Buddha Rocana (盧遮如來). After taking refuge, the rākṣasas completely transformed their dietary habits—from the original brutal "devouring the flesh and blood of others" to "eating flowers, eating incense, eating fruit, eating water, eating wind, eating Dharma, eating joy." * The duty of protecting the nation and the Dharma: The rākṣasas were transformed into Dharma-protecting deities entrusted by the Buddha, and together with yakṣas (夜叉), kumbhāṇḍas (鳩槃茶), and other classes, were dispatched to the various lands of Jambudvīpa—including the kingdom of Aśokaka (阿疎居迦國), the kingdom of Cakraca (遮居迦國), and even the region of "Cīnasthāna" (震旦, China). Figures such as the rākṣasa *Good Giving* (好施羅剎), the rākṣasī *Hārītī* (呵梨帝羅剎女, the "Mother of Ghosts"), and the rākṣasī *Star-Eyes* (星目羅剎女) took responsibility for shielding against untimely wind and rain, dispelling fear, and ensuring abundant harvests, with the special vow to protect practitioners dwelling in araṇya hermitages.

3. Spiritual Symbolism and Metaphor on the Path of Liberation

In the *Madhyama Āgama*, the Buddha employs "being devoured by rākṣasas" as an extremely powerful spiritual metaphor: anyone who does not take refuge in the "true Dharma and Vinaya taught by the Buddha" will, in their mental state, be like one utterly devoured by rākṣasas and imprisoned in an iron city that never sees daylight; whereas one who takes refuge in the true Dharma can, like riding the "Horse King" (䭷馬王), safely cross over the sea of suffering.


Walk-Throughs in Everyday Life

If we treat the "rākṣasa" as nothing more than an ancient myth, we miss this concept's profound insight into present-day life. In contemporary life, we contend every day with all kinds of "modern rākṣasas"—and at times, without realizing it, we ourselves fall into a "rākṣasa state."

Scenario 1: Algorithmic Life and the Psychological Trap of "Manifesting as a Tempting Woman"

* Mapping to the classical definition: In the classical scriptures, a rākṣasa demon manifests as a gentle, beautiful woman, soothing a shipwrecked merchant while in truth intending to pen him up and devour him. * Everyday walk-through: When you have endured a full day of overtime and physical and mental exhaustion (the shipwreck), you open your phone, and the algorithms of short-video platforms and social media precisely push your favorite entertainment content, polarizing emotional topics, or consumerist temptations. It comforts your fatigue with extreme gentleness, offering you instant gratification and emotional value. * Pointing out the common error: People often assume that a "rākṣasa" is an external, tangible form of violent persecution. In fact, the modern algorithmic mechanism is the most typical "rākṣasa manifestation." It lures you in with a warm nest, and before you know it, your time, your attention, and even your brain's capacity for deep thinking are "devoured together with hair, nails, and bloodstained soil." In the end, you find yourself trapped and unable to move, addicted to a stream of meaningless information—this is precisely being locked inside the "Great Iron City with no visible gate."

Scenario 2: Workplace Hatred and the Karmic Trajectory of "a Practitioner Reborn as a Rākṣasa"

* Mapping to the classical definition: The rākṣasa king "Bull-Eye" was, in his previous life, a monk who recited scriptures and aroused bodhicitta; because he gave rise to a single thought of intense hatred toward fellow practitioners, he fell and became a man-eating evil rākṣasa. * Everyday walk-through: In your team, you are an idealistic, driven core member ("you have aroused bodhicitta and uphold the Dharma"), and you originally work with idealism. Yet amid complex office politics or project conflicts, you develop extreme resentment and jealousy toward a rival colleague or supervisor ("you give rise to anger toward monks in the araṇya"). Gradually, this hatred dominates you—you stab people in the back, seize resources, and savagely tear into the other person. * Pointing out the common error: Many people assume that "I have ideals, I am on the side of justice" means they cannot turn bad. But the classical doctrine makes clear: what determines your state of life is not your slogans, but your present mind-moment. Once you are consumed by intense hatred and the urge to control, even if you loudly proclaim idealism, your behavioral patterns have already been completely "rākṣasa-fied"—exploiting others' flesh and blood with cold cruelty to fill your own bottomless pit of insecurity.

Scenario 3: Intimate Relationships and the Psychological Vampirism of "Devouring Others' Flesh and Blood"

* Mapping to the classical definition: Before conversion, rākṣasas brutally suck the flesh and blood of others to obtain energy for their own survival. * Everyday walk-through: In certain highly toxic intimate relationships or parenting dynamics, one party uses PUA tactics, emotional blackmail, and extreme control to continuously drain the other party's self-esteem and life force ("devouring flesh and blood"). After squeezing the other person completely dry, they then disdain them for being fragile and weak. * Pointing out the common error: This kind of "emotional vampirism" is not love—it is the manifestation of rākṣasa instinct. And the turning point of liberation lies precisely in a "change of diet": from depending on sucking the energy and flesh-blood of others (emotional blackmail), to becoming self-sufficient and nourishing the mind through "eating flowers, eating incense, eating Dharma, eating joy"—learning to draw nourishment from the joy of Dharma, goodwill, and a pure way of living, and ceasing to mentally tear at others.


Why Contemporary People Need It

In contemporary society, we appear to live amid the steel and concrete of big cities, far from the wild demons of the wilderness—yet our inner fear, urge to control, and drive to destroy have never diminished. The concept of the rākṣasa offers contemporary people three layers of irreplaceable wisdom:

1. Guarding Against the Psychological Devolution of "Self-Rākṣasa-ization"

Contemporary analogy: Brain science and psychological research show that when human beings remain under chronic stress, extreme competition, or intense threat for long periods, the amygdala is over-activated, rational cortical functions are suppressed, and people regress into animalistic "fight-or-flight" and even "tear-and-devour" modes. The classical karmic cause of the rākṣasa reveals profoundly: the rākṣasa is not a fixed species, but a degeneration of mind-state and life-level. When we allow hatred, jealousy, and intense psychological control to dominate, we are pulling ourselves and those around us into the rākṣasa path. Understanding the rākṣasa is to install a warning mirror for our minds.

2. Offering the Hope of "Utmost Sincere Repentance and Life Reconstruction"

The most fascinating aspect of the rākṣasa concept lies in its transformability. Even a demon that was once a cruel cannibal, devouring even bloodstained soil, can—so long as it can "repent with utmost sincerity and recollect its past lives"—receive the Buddha's prophecy and transform into a righteous power that protects the nation and the Dharma; even its diet becomes extremely refined and pure (eating incense, eating Dharma, eating joy). This offers immense redemptive power to contemporary people who are mired in spiritual mud, guilt, or the evil karma of the past: no life is beyond salvation; there are only minds that have not yet awakened. No matter how chaotic and violent the past, as long as one is willing to completely sever the habit of "tearing at others" and re-establish the vow to protect what is good, life can be utterly turned around.

3. Reshaping a Three-Dimensional Understanding of "Protective Power"

Modern people often have a misunderstanding: that "goodness" means being uniformly gentle and weak. But the rākṣasas in the Buddhist protector system (such as the yakṣa-rākṣasas and the rākṣasī Hārītī), after taking refuge in the true Dharma, transformed their originally brutal energy into a powerful, fierce, justice-guarding executive force. They guard the cardinal directions, quell disasters, and protect practitioners. This tells contemporary people: true compassion and protection require resolute courage and thunderous means to ward off chaos and safeguard inner tranquility.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading 1: Equating the Rākṣasa with "Western Demons" or Purely "Evil Forces"

* Clarification: In certain monotheistic contexts, the devil is an absolutely evil and unredeemable rebel. But in the Buddhist cosmology, the rākṣasa is one class among the beings of the six realms (六道, ṣaḍgati) / the cosmos, with extremely strong plasticity. Their brutality stems from the past karmic force of ignorance and hatred; once they encounter the Dharma and repent with utmost sincerity, they can transform overnight into Dharma-protecting deities who guard the true Dharma and defend the land. In the classical scriptures, rākṣasas stand alongside devas (天), humans, asuras (阿修羅), and others, all equally within the Buddha's compassionate purview.

Misreading 2: Thinking That "Rākṣasas Eating People" Is Merely a Folk Ghost Story to Scare Children

* Clarification: If one stops at the surface of the story, one narrows the deep meaning of the scriptures. The *Madhyama Āgama* explicitly positions "being devoured by a rākṣasa" as a profound spiritual metaphor. If the mind does not take refuge in the true Dharma and lacks the protection of wisdom and right mindfulness, it will be utterly devoured by the "rākṣasa" of ignorance (無明, avidyā), desire, and emotional impulse, imprisoned in the "Great Iron City" of suffering and confusion. This is a precise strike at mental traps, not mere ghost-story fodder.

Misreading 3: Confusing "Rākṣasa" with "Yakṣa"

* Clarification: In the classical scriptures, rākṣasa (羅剎) and yakṣa (夜叉) often appear together (as in the compound "yakṣa-rākṣasa"), but each has its own emphasis. Yakṣas are generally associated with agility, earth-bound spirits, or valiant ghosts and spirits; whereas the rākṣasa, before conversion, has a more pronounced character of "violent cannibalism, deceptive manifestation, dwelling in iron cities, and thorough brutality," and its karmic cause is more strongly tied to "intense hatred."

Misreading 4: Thinking That Modern Science or Brain Science "Proves" the Existence of Rākṣasas

* Clarification: We can use contemporary brain science's analysis of "amygdala hijack" and emotional dysregulation, or algorithms' predation on attention, as analogies for the rākṣasa's manifestation and devouring mechanism, in order to help contemporary people understand. But analogy is not equivalence. The rākṣasa of the classical Buddhist doctrinal corpus is a specific class of non-human beings endowed with sense faculties and karma, and a part of the cosmic view of the path of liberation. Science studies material and neural mechanisms, confined to the observation of the phenomenal world, and cannot replace or "confirm" the deeper doctrines of the Buddhist six realms of rebirth and karmic retribution. We should maintain a clear boundary and never force scientific material into serving as "proof" of the Dharma.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

罗刹(rākṣasa),又称罗刹鬼,是佛教宇宙观中一类具有双重特质的非人众生。在未受佛法化度前,其本性极其暴恶、以食人血肉为生,常居于铁城或化现为妇人诱骗人类;在皈依佛陀、至诚忏悔后,则转化为受佛付嘱、守护国土与正法的护法神。

二、主要阐述

1. 暴恶食人与囚禁人类的特征:根据《中阿含经》,罗刹鬼具有极端的食人行径。她们会化现为妇人形象,诱骗因海难落难的阎浮洲商人,与其共居,实则为了禁锢并食用。她们食人时极为残暴彻底,连头发、毛发、指甲、牙齿都会吃掉,甚至用爪挖掘沾有血迹的泥土深达四寸一并吞食。未被立即食用的人则被囚禁在不见其门的「大铁城」中。

2. 业因与转化契机:《大方等大集经》揭示了罗刹的业因。如罗刹王「牛王目」与万名罗刹,前世曾是出家比丘,虽诵持大乘与声闻法并发菩提心,但因对住阿兰若比丘起瞋怒心,死后先堕地狱,后转生为「食他血肉恶罗刹」。听闻佛陀说法后,他们忆念宿命、至诚忏悔,获得佛陀授记(将于未来卢遮如来时得胜菩提记),从而改变饮食习惯,不再食人血肉,转为「食花、食香、食果、食水、食风、食法、食喜」,誓愿护持佛法。

3. 护国护法的职责与地理分布:在《大方等大集经》中,罗刹与天龙八部等受佛付嘱,分布于阎浮提各国土、城邑、村落及山林,负责遮护非时风雨、息除怖畏、令苗稼充足。例如,南方增长天王麾下的「夜叉罗刹」协同护持南方;特定国土如「阿疎居迦国」付嘱给「好施罗刹」及「呵梨帝罗刹女」;「遮居迦国」则付嘱给「星目罗刹女」;罗刹女亦被安置于「震旦」等国履行护持职责。

4. 信仰与精神层面的比喻:《中阿含经》将「为罗刹食」作为不信正法的强烈隐喻。经中指出,若人不信奉「佛说正法律」,必遭祸害,下场如同被罗刹吞食;若能信奉,则能如乘「䭷马王」般安全度脱。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

1. 名称与术语形式: - 《中阿含经》(东晋瞿昙僧伽提婆译)中,交替使用「罗刹鬼」 与「罗刹」。 - 《大方等大集经》中,出现了特定的罗刹王与罗刹女名号,如罗刹王「牛王目」、罗刹「好施罗刹」、罗刹女「呵梨帝罗刹女」、「星目罗刹女」。

2. 伴随众生与地理译名: - 《中阿含经》在宇宙众生分类中,将罗刹与「揵塔和」(即乾闼婆)并列。 - 《大方等大集经》中,罗刹与「夜叉」、「鸠槃茶」等恶鬼神并列,并提及「震旦」(中国)、「阿疎居迦国」、「遮居迦国」等地理名号。

3. 比喻与特殊词汇: - 《中阿含经》使用「䭷马王」作为度脱比喻,并以「佛说正法律」指代佛法。 - 《大方等大集经》使用独特的饮食转变术语,即从「食他血肉」转为「食花、食香、食果、食水、食风、食法、食喜」。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「阿兰若比丘」的关系:罗刹的恶业源于前世对住阿兰若比丘起瞋怒心;皈依后,他们誓愿特别护持住阿兰若的声闻弟子。 2. 与「天龙八部/夜叉/鸠槃茶」的关系:罗刹在宇宙众生中与天、人、阿修罗、揵塔和等并列;在护法体系中,与夜叉、鸠槃茶等同受佛陀付嘱,如「夜叉罗刹」协同南方增长天王护持世间。 3. 与「䭷马王」的关系:在《中阿含经》的比喻中,「䭷马王」代表信奉正法而得度脱的安全力量,与代表毁灭的「罗刹食人」形成鲜明对比。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于罗刹鬼的暴恶与铁城囚禁:「非真人,是罗刹鬼耳」……将二百五十人闭在大铁城中。 2. 关于不信正法的比喻:「若有不信士,佛说正法律……此等为罗刹食」。 3. 关于宇宙众生并列:「天及人、阿修罗、揵塔和、罗刹及余若干身」。 4. 关于罗刹的业因与转变:「食他血肉恶罗刹」……「不复食肉,食花、食香、食果、食水、食风、食法、食喜」。 5. 关于护国付嘱:「好施罗刹及呵梨帝罗刹女等……星目罗刹女等」;「震旦」等国土的护持。

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》對「羅剎」的論述,可從以下幾方面加以歸納:

一、作為食人惡鬼的具體形象 本經以商人入海遇難的背景,詳述羅剎為人形的食人惡鬼。據商人所述,羅剎「便食我等,極遭逼迫」,食人時「有餘髮毛及爪齒者,彼婦人等盡取食之」,若「有血渧地,彼婦人等便以手爪掘地深四寸,取而食之」。此處凸顯羅剎爪牙之銳利與食人之貪婪,連滴落之血亦掘地取食,顯示其食人之徹底與殘酷。

二、羅剎以假相誘人 本經描述羅剎能化作人形,假裝為同行伴侶(「共居婦人」),實則「非真人,是羅剎鬼耳」。此一情節指出羅剎的特性——以親近之假象迷惑人心,商人因此被拘禁於大鐵城中,原有五百人已遭吞噬二百五十。本經以此警示意義,強調羅剎並非真實之人類,而是以人形掩飾的鬼類。

三、以羅剎為喻說明信法與否的果報 本經有一偈頌云:「若有不信於,佛說正法律,彼人必被害,如為羅剎食。若人有信於,佛說正法律,彼得安隱度,如乘䭷馬王」。此處以「羅剎食」比喻不信佛法所招感的禍害,以「乘䭷馬王」比喻信法的安隱度脫。本經此一用法,將羅剎食人與信不信正法作直接對比,凸顯羅剎作為恐怖象徵的一面。

四、作為世間有情眾生的一類 本經於王問訊之語中,將羅剎與天、人、阿修羅、揵塔和並列為「及餘若干身」,構成世間有情的一類:「今天及人、阿修羅、揵塔和、羅剎及餘若干身安隱快樂」。此處羅剎並非純粹的恐怖形象,而是與其他眾生同為世間有情之一,同蒙佛之加被。

五、本經所用術語 本經主要使用「羅剎」一詞,於指明其鬼類性質時則用複合詞「羅剎鬼」。本經未使用其他變體譯名(如「羅剎娑」、「夜叉羅剎」等),僅以「羅剎」與「羅剎鬼」二詞出現。「羅剎鬼」一稱與其他經典中常見的「夜叉」或「羅剎娑」等譯名所指同一類,但本經一律簡稱為「羅剎」。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》中,羅剎被論述為一類具威力、能食人的鬼類,與天、乾沓和並列為非人之屬。

一、分類與定位 本經將羅剎與天、乾沓和(又作乾沓惒)並列為不同類別的存在。經文以問答形式區辨:「為天乾沓惒?羅剎鬼神耶?」、「為天乾沓和,羅剎鬼神乎?」;又有否定句式:「非天乾沓和,非鬼魅羅剎」。可見羅剎在當時佛教分類中與天、乾沓和(樂神)同屬非人界,但獨立於二者之外,為專以食人為業的鬼類。商主亦指認:「此必是羅剎」、「此是羅剎,非女人也」,皆以「羅剎」一詞辨其本來面目。

二、居處與兇性 本經述羅剎「居大海側」、「恆食噉人民」,明其本性為食人惡鬼,棲於海險之處;商人誤墮其境,羅剎群起而食,且其後「羅剎非人時取王食噉,唯有骨存,便捨而去」,揭示其食人必盡的兇殘本性。

三、神變威力 經中特別強調羅剎具隱形化身之威力:羅剎見商客來,「即隱羅剎之形,化作女人,端正無比」以誘惑之;最大羅剎之主亦「化作女人之形,極於端正,又以兩手指胸」而言:「設不食汝等,終不為羅剎也。」此種變化能力為本經描述羅剎威力的核心特徵,且與食人之本性緊密相連——若不食人,則不為羅剎。

四、群體結構 經中出現「羅剎部」、「諸羅剎」、「羅剎之主」、「最大羅剎之主」等語,可見羅剎非個體散居,而有部眾、主從之組織結構。商主入海乃「墮彼羅剎部中」,顯示其有地域性之群體。

五、術語形式彙整 本經所用羅剎相關術語包括:羅剎、羅剎鬼神、鬼魅羅剎、羅剎部、羅剎種、諸羅剎、羅剎之主、最大羅剎之主、羅剎非人等。偈頌中以「羅剎種」稱之:「我等墮此難,無男無女想,斯是羅剎種,漸當食我等。」

六、以此為本生譬喻 經載佛陀以「過去久遠婆羅㮈城普富商主入海遭羅剎」的本生因緣作譬,告誡比丘勿貪著女色,當修不淨想。佛自述本生:「爾時羅剎者,今此女人是。爾時馬王者,今我身是。爾時五百商人者,今五百比丘是。」以此令犯過比丘悔過修道。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》論及羅剎,可歸為兩個層面:作為具威力之食人惡鬼,以及作為受佛付囑之護國善類。

一、羅剎為食人惡鬼神。經中將羅剎明列為「惡鬼神」之一類,並具體稱之為「食他血肉惡羅剎」,顯示其兇殘食人之本性。經敘羅剎王名牛王目,與萬羅剎王合掌向佛,自陳其業報因緣:此等羅剎於過去鳩留孫如來法中曾出家,誦持八萬大乘法聚及八萬聲聞法聚,並發無上菩提願;然因親近惡知識、於阿蘭若住法比丘所起瞋怒心,以瞋使故命終先墮地獄,地獄報盡方生此食血肉之惡羅剎身,為求飲食斷無量億那由他百千眾生命。此段凸顯羅剎之「威力」並非天生,而是源自過去世修行者因瞋恚重罪所招感之果報,經文以「昔行大乘者」、「昔出家時共作惡業」等語,說明其惡趣身分背後之深厚業緣。

二、羅剎之悔過與授記。經中並非僅視羅剎為純粹惡類,而是強調其悔過得度之可能。羅剎王牛王目等於佛前至到三白悔諸惡業、堅固修行律儀,並求佛授無上菩提記。世尊告以:「我不見更有一法遠離菩提心,如於阿蘭若比丘所而起惡心者」,並預記此等羅剎於未來賢劫最後盧遮如來出世時得受勝菩提記。羅剎王聞已垂淚自誓:「寧處地獄,不作人身於阿蘭若比丘所一念之頃而起惡心,以彼能斷一切善故」,足見經文對阿蘭若比丘之尊崇。同一段中亦載諸惡鬼神敬信三寶、住柔軟心,發願護持佛法、受佛付囑、增上護持住阿蘭若之聲聞弟子。

三、羅剎為護國善類。經中亦將羅剎納入佛所付囑之護國體系。火花毘樓勒叉天王應護閻浮提南方第四分時,經云「并及汝子一切眷屬大臣軍將夜叉羅剎,皆令護持」,將羅剎與夜叉並列為同類強力眷屬。又於諸國付囑中,明列好施羅剎千眷屬、呵梨帝羅剎女千眷屬共護阿疎居迦國,星目羅剎女五百眷屬共護遮居迦國。此處之羅剎已非食人惡鬼之形象,而是與龍王、夜叉、乾闥婆、毘舍遮、鳩槃荼、餓鬼等並列,受佛付囑「共護」某國之護法神。

四、術語形式。本經以「羅剎」為主,並見「羅剎王」、「羅剎女」之性別與階位區分;特定羅剎各有專名,如「牛王目」、「好施羅剎」、「呵梨帝羅剎女」、「星目羅剎女」等。本經亦以「食他血肉惡羅剎」一詞明示其食人之本質,並出現「夜叉羅剎」之連用語,將二者並列為同類眷屬。