Dharma · AI Companion

本覺

众生心体本来具有的觉性。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

真常系于性空之后正面安立心体本觉(初立第三重);《起信论》言心体离念、本觉即离言故究竟第四重。〔判教镜头〕台贤禅依本觉立真常唯心,中观唯识少用本觉语,不裁决。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the cognitive experience of modern people, "learning" and "growth" often mean a kind of acquired augmentation: by absorbing knowledge, training skills, and cultivating the mind, we try to move ourselves from a state of lack and confusion gradually into a wiser, more integrated person.

But in Mahāyāna Buddhism—especially in the tathāgatagarbha (如來藏, "womb of the Thus-Gone One") approach represented by the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* (《大佛頂首楞嚴經》)—the fundamental assumptions about "liberation" and "wisdom" are diametrically opposed. It makes an extremely startling underlying judgment: within the self-nature of all sentient beings there is already, fully and completely present, an awareness that is unborn and undying, permanent and indestructible, pure and luminously clear. This inherently complete awareness is called original enlightenment (本覺, prakṛti-prabhāsvaratā, "original enlightenment").

One-sentence definition: original enlightenment refers to the pure awareness that is inherently complete in the self-nature of sentient beings, unborn and undying, and permanently uninterrupted.

To understand "original enlightenment" accurately, one must clarify the core structure built around it in the classical scriptures and treatises. One must not fudge it with modern psychological or popular-general terms:

1. Neither Causal nor Natural: An Absolute Existence Beyond Worldly Oppositions

Every phenomenon we can encounter in the secular world is either born from the "combination of causes and conditions" (因緣和合; e.g., a seed plus sunlight and water grows into a tree, or various items of knowledge and experience recombine to form a new idea), or is attributed to the inherent property of being "spontaneous and natural" (e.g., water flows downhill).

But the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* states explicitly that original enlightenment is "neither of causal nor of natural nature" (非因緣非自然性) [11524].

- It is not born of causes and conditions: it is by no means a product "created" through later sitting meditation, contemplation, cultivation, or the accumulation of knowledge. If original enlightenment were cultivated into being, that would mean it has a point in time when it "arises"; and since it arises, there must necessarily come a day when it "ceases." - Nor is it "natural": it is not a lifeless pattern that falls out of the void without cause or condition. Its "source of awareness" (覺元, the origin of awakening) does not depend for its existence on any conditioned or unconditioned relationship in the world [11524].

It is the unborn-and-undying nature that sentient beings inherently possess. Even as we revolve through the six realms (六道, ṣaḍgati) and undergo birth-and-death transformations for countless kalpas—the body ages and decays, deluded thoughts arise and vanish in flight—this "pure original mind" and "original enlightenment" have never been diminished in the slightest; they remain permanently present and indestructible [11524].

2. "Nature-Awareness Wondrously Bright, Original Enlightenment Bright and Wondrous": The Pure Relationship of Substance and Function

The sūtra text depicts the content of original enlightenment in language of extreme rigor, where each phrase mirrors the other—"the nature of awareness is wondrously bright; original enlightenment is bright and wondrous" (性覺妙明,本覺明妙) [11858].

- Nature-aware and wondrously bright (性覺妙明): from the perspective of the "nature of awareness" (substance, 體), awareness itself is a subtle luminosity that leaves no trace. - Original enlightenment, bright and wondrous (本覺明妙): from the perspective of the "substance of original enlightenment" (function, 用), the substance of original enlightenment is itself luminous and subtle.

In this state, "awareness" and "luminosity" are fused into one whole; there is no opposition between seeing and being seen, knowing and being known. The sūtra also calls it "original enlightenment, wondrously bright" (本覺妙明) or "the bright mind of original enlightenment" (本覺明心) [11524, 11977].

3. "Setting Up Knowledge Upon Knowledge Is the Root of Ignorance": How Does Original Enlightenment Evolve a World Through Subtle Deluded Movement?

Since original enlightenment is originally pure and complete, where do the suffering of the world, saṃsāra, and the receptacle world (器世間, bhājana-loka) come from?

The *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* reveals an extremely subtle evolutionary process of mind-only (唯識, vijñapti-mātra) and the nature of mind: in the pure state of "nature-aware and wondrously bright; original enlightenment, bright and wondrous," awareness is inherently self-luminous. However, if on top of this pure awareness one "wishes to give rise to a subject that illuminates and perceives" (what the sūtra calls "that which is illuminated is nothing other than the establishment of illumination" [所明無他,建立夫明], or "awareness upon illumination" [有明明覺]), a crisis is born [11858].

The moment one tries to "add another act of perceiving" on top of awareness, the originally pure and undivided knowing is instantly split into a subject (the perceiver) and an object (the perceived) [11858]. This subtle deluded movement produces clinging and entanglement; awareness degenerates into deluded thought, which then evolves into the "six sense faculties" (六根, ṣaḍ-indriya) of eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind; the "six sense objects" (六塵, ṣaḍ-viṣaya) of form, sound, smell, taste, touch, and mental objects; and even the vast, complex receptacle world of mountains, rivers, and the great earth [11858, 11869].

4. "Awareness of Conditions Is Not an Eye Disease": When Sunk in Confusion, Original Enlightenment Remains Undamaged

This is the most consoling and subversive point in the teaching of original enlightenment. The sūtra says: "The bright mind of original enlightenment, aware of conditions, is not an eye disease" (本覺明心覺緣非眚) [11524]. ("眚" refers to an eye affliction, a pathological condition.)

The meaning is: even if sentient beings are now in the midst of extremely severe anxiety, inversion, and clinging, blown about by the wind-force of various delusive conditions, that "bright mind of original enlightenment" which can perceive all of this has not contracted any eye disease; its substance has never been polluted in the slightest [11524].

Just as the sky is covered by dark clouds—clouds may gather densely and even pour down rain, yet the sky itself is never stained wet or torn apart; or just as gold ore, though mixed with sand and mud before refining, has a physical and chemical nature that never changes within the mud.

In the fruition stage or perfected state, it is called the "jewel-awareness true mind" (寶覺真心) or the "jewel-awareness, perfectly bright, true, wondrous, pure mind" (寶覺圓明真妙淨心) [11862]. The sūtra states categorically that sentient beings and all Buddhas and Tathāgatas are "each perfectly complete," without duality or difference, in the "jewel-awareness true mind" [11862]. The reason sentient beings have not yet manifested it is solely that they are wrapped in "defiling toil and deluded thought" (塵勞妄想); the completeness of their substance has not been reduced by half a fraction [11862].

5. The Place of Original Enlightenment in the Entire Path of Liberation

In the coordinate system of the entire path of liberation, "original enlightenment" is both the end point and the starting point (that is, the unity of the "mind of the causal ground" and the "awakening of the fruition ground").

If liberation required establishing from scratch something that did not originally exist, then such liberation would be impermanent. Precisely because "original enlightenment" is inherently complete, the essence of practice is no longer "seeking outward" or "building something new," but rather "removing obscuration" and "returning."

As the sūtra summarizes the path of return: "When the sense faculties and sense objects dissolve away, and one no longer follows the various conditioned marks, then awareness-luminosity naturally restores its round and wondrous substance" (根塵銷落,不循諸有為相,則覺明自然恢復其圓妙之體) [11869]. As long as one no longer chases after all the conditioned, arising-and-ceasing false appearances of the world, the obscuration is removed, and the luminosity of original enlightenment naturally reveals itself in full [11869].


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To avoid misunderstanding "original enlightenment" as some kind of abstruse philosophical concept, let us walk through it step by step, following the structure of the classical sūtra, in a scene with which modern people are extremely familiar—"scrolling through one's phone late at night and irritability from overtime work."

Scene: 2 a.m., exhausted after overtime, lying in bed scrolling short videos

- The opening move: subtle deluded movement and "awareness upon illumination": You have just returned home from overtime work, and your body is extremely tired. In that moment, there is actually an extremely pure, acute perception of "knowing that you are tired." But immediately afterward, the mind moves subtly: "I've had it so rough; I'm so tired today; I have to do something to relax (giving rise to the split between a perceiving subject 'one who' and an object 'what is perceived')." This is the arising of "awareness upon illumination" (有明明覺) within "nature-aware and wondrously bright" [11858]. You are trying to build, on top of the pure perception, a "subject that goes looking for stimulation/relaxation."

- The construction of the wind-force of delusive conditions and the receptacle world (forms): Next, you open your phone. The algorithms in the short-video app push funny sketches, consumerist advertisements, and anxiety-inducing news. Your eye faculty locks onto the screen (forms, 色塵), and your ear faculty takes in sounds (聲塵). As the sūtra teaches, all these appearances of worlds and beings are "turned by the wind-force of delusive conditions" (妄緣風力所轉) [11977]. The information stream in the videos (delusive conditions) sweeps your thoughts along like a violent wind: one moment you are angry, the next you are laughing wildly, the next you feel a shopping impulse.

- Obscuration by defiling toil and "pathological deluded perception": You scroll until 3 a.m. Your eyes are sore, your head is numb, and your heart is filled with emptiness, self-blame, and anxiety: "I have to get up early tomorrow. How did I lose control again? I'm such a useless person." At this point, you are deeply sunk in "defiling toil and deluded thought" [11862]. You have completely taken the false appearances on the screen and the arising-and-ceasing anxiety in your mind (deluded thought) as the real "me."

- The crucial revelation: right now, where is your "original enlightenment"? Most people mis-map this point most easily: they think that only when they calm down, sit in meditation, enter concentration, and are free of stray thoughts does that state count as "original enlightenment"; and that in the present anxious, out-of-control, phone-scrolling self, "original enlightenment" has been lost or damaged. The hard-hitting point of the classical scriptural meaning is precisely revealed here: When you feel extremely anxious at 3 a.m. and are looking at the phone screen, has that awareness which "knows that you are anxious," that which "clearly sees the light of the phone," been polluted by anxiety? Anxiety is an arising-and-ceasing psychological phenomenon (the aggregate of formations, 行蘊 / the aggregate of feeling, 受蘊); the light of the phone is an arising-and-ceasing physical phenomenon (form, 色塵). But that "awareness-nature" which can "illuminate" and "perceive" the anxiety and the light—it itself is neither anxious nor luminous [11524]. This is precisely "the bright mind of original enlightenment, aware of conditions, is not an eye disease" (本覺明心覺緣非眚) [11524]! Even if you have fallen into the deepest mire of afflictions, that "substance of awareness" which can perceive suffering is like sunlight shining on a garbage heap: the garbage stinks, but the sunlight is never polluted in the slightest. Your original enlightenment has been there all along, without any diminishment [11524].

- The method of return: the dissolution of sense faculties and sense objects When you suddenly realize this, you no longer continue acting out the logic of "I'm so anxious, I need to watch one more video" (not following the various conditioned marks, 不循諸有為相). You place the phone face-down on the table and close your eyes. In the moment your eyes leave the screen (the instant the sense faculty and sense object separate), those plots, products, and anxieties that just had you spellbound vanish like smoke. "When the sense faculties and sense objects dissolve away, and one no longer follows the various conditioned marks, then awareness-luminosity naturally restores its round and wondrous substance" [11869]. You settle back into that pure awareness which does not arise and cease with the short videos, which does not arise and cease with anxiety.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life places extreme value on "addition" and "construction." The training we receive from childhood is: you are not perfect now; you need to earn higher degrees, accumulate more wealth, build a more perfect physique, and gather more connections before you can become a "person of value." When this logic is carried into the spiritual realm, it turns into frantic "mental anxiety"—people continually attend various psychological therapies, meditation check-ins, and spiritual trainings, trying to "cultivate" a strong inner mind.

Yet this logic based on "lack—augmentation" often leads to a deeper exhaustion: If you believe that wisdom and peace are "cultivated" later in life, then you will constantly worry that they will "leak away" or "regress." Today you meditate for twenty minutes and feel great; tomorrow you lose emotional control at work, and you fall into self-blame: "I've regressed again."

The teaching of "original enlightenment" has an extremely striking detoxifying function in the contemporary era:

1. The ultimate anchor for breaking through the "sense of spiritual lack": Original enlightenment tells you that at the most fundamental level, you are already complete (each one perfectly complete) [11862]. You do not need to go into the external world to "earn" your self-nature, nor do you need to "beg" wisdom from any master. Your suffering, anxiety, and confusion are only clouds in the sky; they are not the sky itself. This recognition can instantly rescue a person from the chronic inferiority and mental attrition of "I am not good enough."

2. Redefining the "view of self" (in dialogue with contemporary AI and brain science): In the contemporary era, brain science attempts to explain human consciousness as "a combination of electrical signals in brain neurons" (the evolution of neural networks); AI technology, through massive data training, simulates extremely lifelike linguistic and logical responses. This has triggered an existential crisis in contemporary people: Are we just a complex biological computer? Is our consciousness just a product of algorithms and electrical signals? - The comparison between original enlightenment and contemporary science, and the revelation of their limits: What brain science studies—"memory, emotion, reflex, cognition"—is, from the Buddhist perspective, at most the reflection of the "six sense objects" upon the "six sense faculties," belonging to the arising-and-ceasing "deluded thought" and "defiling toil" [11862]. What contemporary brain science excels at observing is the objectified phenomena of consciousness (electrical signals measurable by instruments); what "original enlightenment" points to is that awareness-substance which is able to perceive all these electrical signals, able to sense "existence itself." Science can explain how the brain processes data (which is precisely like the operation of algorithms and wind-force) [11977], but science to this day cannot explain the "sensory quality of subjective experience" (what philosophy calls the Hard Problem of Consciousness). The teaching of original enlightenment is rooted precisely here: awareness-nature is not a by-product of material evolution; it is an absolute substance that transcends the combination of causes and conditions [11524]. Understanding original enlightenment allows contemporary people, in an age pressed upon by algorithms and technology, to reconfirm the dignity in human nature that is most irreplaceable by machines and least subject to the perishing of matter.

3. It offers an extremely light view of practice: Practice is no longer "clenching one's teeth to fight against one's bad self," nor is it "forcibly scrubbing the mind clean." Practice is simply "recognizing original enlightenment" and "no longer mistaking a thief for one's father." When you understand that afflictions are only illusions "turned by the wind-force of delusive conditions" [11977], you no longer need to "kill" afflictions; you only need to not follow them (not following the various conditioned marks), let the sense faculties and sense objects dissolve naturally, and the luminosity of original enlightenment naturally manifests [11869].


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Because the concept of "original enlightenment" is extremely vast and points directly at the root, it is极易 in modern dissemination to be abused or misunderstood. Below are several of the most typical misreadings and the clarifications from classical doctrine:

Misreading 1: "Since my original enlightenment is inherently complete and equal to the Buddha, I don't need to do anything at all; even reckless wrongdoing is original enlightenment." (Falling into a soul-theory or annihilationist emptiness)

- Clarification: This is the extremely dangerous error of "clinging to principle while discarding phenomena" (執理廢事). Although the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* says that sentient beings and Buddhas are "each perfectly complete" in the jewel-awareness true mind [11862], the sūtra simultaneously devotes a great deal of space to analyzing how sentient beings are entangled by "defiling toil and deluded thought" [11862]. To use an analogy: a gold mine does indeed contain nothing but gold (original enlightenment), but the ore is still buried in thick mud and sand (deluded thought and karmic force). If you took unrefined ore and tried to buy things with it as pure gold, you would only be taken for a madman. "Original enlightenment" is the completeness of "principle-identity with Buddhahood" (理即佛) or "inherent possession" (性具); but on the level of phenomenal marks (事相), sentient beings, because of subtle deluded movement, have long established a solid subject-object opposition and karmic inertia [11858]. If one does not remove the obscuration through "the dissolution of sense faculties and sense objects," strict observance of pure precepts, and deep meditative observation, original enlightenment will forever remain only "the sky covered by dark clouds," and you will continue to feel real suffering of saṃsāra within illusions [11869].

Misreading 2: Equating "original enlightenment" with psychology's "subconscious," "self," or brain science's "brain awareness."

- Clarification: This is a typical case of "fudging through term-matching." - Subconscious/unconscious: The subconscious of which depth psychology (e.g., Freud, Jung) speaks is still a psychological sediment shaped by personal history, racial memory, and experiential causes and conditions. In Buddhist mind-only theory it belongs to the category of the "storehouse consciousness" (阿賴耶識, ālayavijñāna); it is the arising-and-ceasing, causally-conditioned "aggregate of formations" (行蘊) and "aggregate of consciousness" (識蘊), and is by no means the "neither causal nor natural" original enlightenment [11524]. - Brain awareness: The awareness of which brain science speaks depends on the cerebral cortex, neurotransmitters, and organ function; it is entirely a product of "causes and conditions." If the brain is damaged, awareness changes or is lost. Original enlightenment, by contrast, is that which is "not belonging to combination or non-combination" (覺元不屬和合與不和合) [11524]; it does not depend on the existence or destruction of biological organs.

Misreading 3: Misunderstanding "original enlightenment" as some kind of deified "Great Self" (Brahman) or an idealist creator god.

- Clarification: Many people, upon hearing that "original enlightenment gives rise to the receptacle world" [11858], assume that original enlightenment created the world the way God creates things. The classical scriptures have an extremely strict definition of this: original enlightenment is absolutely not a creator. The world appears not because original enlightenment "actively creates," but because a single subtle deluded movement arises on awareness ("awareness upon illumination") [11858]. This deluded movement is like an eye that develops a cataract (a pathological condition): looking at the sky, one sees wild flowers falling. The substance of original enlightenment is "apart from all marks"; it is neither born of causes and conditions nor is it natural [11524]. It does not posit a subject, nor does it preside over all things. It is pure awareness that transcends the opposition of subject and object.

Misreading 4: "Original enlightenment" is an extremely blissful, luminous state "produced" after practicing to the highest level.

- Clarification: If original enlightenment were "produced" by practice, it would become a "conditioned dharma" (因緣法) and would necessarily undergo "arising, abiding, change, and ceasing." The sūtra repeatedly emphasizes that original enlightenment is "not causal" (非因緣) [11524]. Practice is not about "fabricating" original enlightenment, nor about "cultivating a light"; it is "ceasing is bodhi" (歇即菩提). The fantastic lights you see in meditation and the extreme bliss you feel still belong to the categories of "form" (色塵) or the "aggregate of feeling" (受蘊); they are arising-and-ceasing illusions. The true original enlightenment is that absolute awareness which "can see light and can also see darkness; can perceive pleasure and can also perceive pain, but is itself neither light nor darkness, neither pleasure nor pain" [11524]. Not clinging to any conditioned mark, awareness-luminosity naturally restores its original face [11869].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 在《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》(《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》)中,“本觉”被定义为众生自性中本来具足、不生不灭且常住不断的清净觉性。本觉并非通过后天修行或因缘和合而新生的产物,而是众生本自拥有的、不随生死流转而磨灭的本然觉悟之源。它是远离一切因缘与自然等相对概念的绝对存在,是众生得以解脱、圆满菩提的根本依据。

二、主要阐述 1. 本觉的体性与常住不坏 根据经文论述,本觉的根本体性是常住不坏的。众生在生死轮回中,其肉体与妄念虽有生灭,但其“清净本心”与“本觉”却始终常住,不曾有丝毫减损。经中强调,众生若能远离一切和合与不和合的世间因缘,便能彻底灭除生死的根本原因,从而圆满菩提的不生灭性,使“清净本心本觉常住”之状态完全显现。本觉的这种妙明自性,既不是由各种因缘和合而生的(非因缘),也不是自然而然、无因脱空的属性(非自然性),其觉悟的本源(“觉元”)不依赖于任何和合或不和合的关系而存在。 2. 本觉的妄动与器世间的产生 经中深入探讨了本觉如何因妄动而演化出虚妄的器世间与众生相。在“性觉妙明,本觉明妙”的本然状态中,觉性本身即是微妙的光明,本觉之体也是明照而微妙的。然而,若在这一纯净的觉性之上,试图再生起一个去照亮、去觉知的主体(即“有明明觉”),就会在原本精纯无杂的了知中产生主客体的对立,从而失去本然的精纯了知。这种微细的妄动导致了粘缚,使觉性退失为妄想,进而演化出六根、六尘以及器世间等种种虚妄相状。 3. 妄见中的本觉与复归之路 尽管众生因妄动而堕入迷妄之中,执着于眼前的虚妄境界,但其“本觉明心”在本质上并未受到污染。经中指出,“本觉明心觉缘非眚”,这意味着本觉明心在感知种种因缘时,其自身并没有任何病态与执着,其本体依然保持着清净。众生若要复归本觉,关键在于“根尘销落”。只要不再顺从、追逐世间的一切有为相,那么原本被妄想遮蔽的“觉明”自然会恢复其圆融微妙的本体。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 在《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》(《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》)中,针对“本觉”这一核心概念,经文在不同的语境下采用了多种独特的关联术语和表述方式,这些表述在侧重点上各有不同: 1. 性觉妙明,本觉明妙:这一表述侧重于说明觉性与明妙的本然关系。其中,“性觉妙明”强调觉性之本性即是微妙的光明;“本觉明妙”则强调本觉之体本身就是明照而微妙的,两者互为表里,不可分割。 2. 本觉妙明:此术语专门用以指代本觉本自具足的微妙光明。在经中,无量声佛曾以此法门开示菩萨,令其观察世界以及众生之身,皆是妄缘风力所转,从而引导菩萨认识到现象的虚妄与本觉妙明的真实。 3. 本觉明心:此词指代本觉清净明亮的心体。经文通过“本觉明心觉缘非眚”的论述,强调该心体在面对因缘时具有不堕于病态妄见的超越性。 4. 宝觉真心 / 宝觉圆明真妙净心:这是对本觉在果位或圆满状态下的尊称。经中指出,众生与如来在“宝觉真心”上是“各各圆满”、无二无别的。众生之所以未能显现此心,仅仅是因为执着于尘劳妄想,其本体的圆满性并未因此减少。

四、与相关概念的关系 1. 本觉与清净本心:两者是同体异名的关系。清净本心是本觉的承载者,而本觉是清净本心的觉照属性。两者皆是常住不坏的,共同构成了众生的不生灭性。 2. 本觉与因缘、自然:本觉超越了世间的因缘法与自然论。它既非因缘所生,亦非自然而然的属性,其觉元不属于和合,亦不属于不和合,是绝对的离言自性。 3. 本觉与妄缘、尘劳:妄缘与尘劳是遮蔽本觉的障碍。世界与众生之身皆由妄缘风力所转,众生因尘劳妄想而无法证得宝觉真心。然而,妄缘虽起,本觉不失;一旦根尘销落,不循有为,本觉之明自然恢复。

五、代表性原文引用 1. 关于本觉常住与非因缘性:“清净本心本觉常住……非因缘非自然性……本觉明心觉缘非眚”。 2. 关于觉性妙明与妄动的产生:“性觉妙明,本觉明妙”;“元明照用,执妄为真”。 3. 关于本觉妙明的观察:“本觉妙明……观察世界及众生之身皆是妄缘风力所转”。 4. 关于宝觉真心的平等性:“宝觉真心”与“宝觉圆明真妙净心”在众生与如来中“各各圆满”。 5. 关于复归本觉:“根尘销落,不循诸有为相,则觉明自然恢复其圆妙之体”。

By SutraAI-generated

大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經T0945 · 密教部

《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》論本覺,以「本覺妙明」「本覺明妙」「性覺妙明」為核心術語,將本覺安立為眾生心體本具、不生不滅之覺性,並與「覺明」「妄見」「眚」對舉以顯真妄之辨。

一、本覺為離眚之真覺。經中謂「覺見即眚,本覺明心覺緣非眚;覺所覺眚,覺非眚中,此實見見」——能覺之見若有所緣即成眚病,惟本覺明心覺照諸緣而本身非眚;此「見見」之真精性非眚,故不復以覺、聞、知、見之名可得。是經以「眚」(目病生影)喻妄覺,以本覺為本無病翳者,此為其獨特之譬喻與用語。

二、本覺常住,為生死還滅之歸處。經云十方有漏國及諸眾生,同是「覺明無漏妙心」,因見、聞、覺、知虛妄病緣和合妄生、和合妄死;若能遠離諸和合緣及不和合,則滅除諸生死因,「圓滿菩提不生滅性,清淨本心本覺常住」。本覺在此即清淨本心、不生滅性之異名,為眾生本具而常住者。

三、本覺非因緣、非自然,亦非和合生。阿難「先悟本覺妙明性非因緣非自然性」,然猶未明此覺元「非和合生及不和合」;佛遂以妙淨見精為與明和、與暗和、與通和、與塞和,及與明合、暗合、通合、塞合等層層詰破,顯本覺妙明不假和合而成。此處「本覺妙明」與「妙淨見精」並用,指同一本具覺性。

四、性覺妙明、本覺明妙為萬法生起之究極所依。富樓那問:根、塵、陰、處、界等既皆「如來藏清淨本然」,云何忽生山河大地諸有為相?佛舉「性覺妙明本覺明妙」為答,並詰「為復性明稱名為覺?為覺不明稱為明覺?」富樓那謂若此不明名為覺則無所明,佛言若無所明則無明覺。是經以「性覺」與「本覺」對舉互成,強調覺性本自妙明,非別有所明而後稱覺;此「性覺妙明,本覺明妙」之表述為本經獨特用語。又經中以「如來藏清淨本然」與本覺並說,地、水、火、風本性圓融、周遍法界、湛然常住,皆就此本覺妙明而顯。

五、本覺妙明為圓通觀行之所依。二十五圓通中,瑠璃光法王子憶往昔無量聲佛「開示菩薩本覺妙明」,觀此世界及眾生身皆是妄緣風力所轉,進而觀界安立、觀世動時、觀身動止、觀心動念,「諸動無二,等無差別」。是本覺妙明非僅理體之名,亦為可觀可證之圓通法門。同會中月光童子觀水性一味流通得無生忍、圓滿菩提,烏芻瑟摩(持地菩薩)悟身界二塵等無差別、「本如來藏虛妄發塵,塵銷智圓成無上道」,皆與本覺常住、清淨本然之旨相貫。

總之,本經之用語為「本覺」「本覺妙明」「本覺明妙」「性覺妙明」,並與「覺明無漏妙心」「妙淨見精」「清淨本心」「如來藏清淨本然」互文;其論本覺,既顯其離眚、常住、非因緣自然和合之體性,又就山河大地忽生之間,將本覺妙明立為真妄、動靜、染淨之究極所依。

大乘起信論(真諦譯)T1666 · 論集部

《大乘起信論(真諦譯)》以「一心二門」為綱,於心生滅門中依如來藏說生滅心,謂「不生不滅與生滅和合,非一非異」,立名「阿梨耶識」(此即本論對阿賴耶識之譯名用詞)。此識具二義:覺義與不覺義,本覺即就覺義而立。

論中對本覺之核心界定為:「所言覺義者,謂心體離念。離念相者,等虛空界無所不遍,法界一相即是如來平等法身,依此法身說名本覺。」是知本覺非別有一物,乃心體離念所顯之如來法身,遍滿法界、無有邊際。又明本覺與始覺之關係:「本覺義者,對始覺義說,以始覺者即同本覺。始覺義者,依本覺故而有不覺,依不覺故說有始覺。」本覺為所依之體,始覺為能顯之用,究竟覺即是始覺同於本覺,非別得一覺。

論復以四相配覺之淺深:凡夫覺知前念起惡而止後念,「雖復名覺,即是不覺」;二乘觀智及初發意菩薩覺於念異,名「相似覺」;法身菩薩覺於念住,名「隨分覺」;菩薩地盡一念相應、覺心初起心無初相,名「究竟覺」。然論終歸之曰:「而實無有始覺之異,以四相俱時而有皆無自立,本來平等同一覺故。」生住異滅四相本無先後,始覺與本覺究竟無二。

本覺隨染而生二種相,與本覺不相捨離:一者「智淨相」,依法力熏習、如實修行,破和合識相、滅相續心相,顯現法身,智淳淨故;二者「不思議業相」,依智淨能作一切勝妙境界,無量功德常無斷絕,隨眾生根自然相應。論以大海水因風波動為喻:水相風相不相捨離,而水非動性,風止則動相滅而濕性不壞;眾生自性清淨心因無明風動亦復如是,無明滅則相續滅而智性不壞。此喻明本覺之體性恆常不壞,染污唯是客塵。

論又立覺體四種大義,「與虛空等,猶如淨鏡」:如實空鏡,遠離一切心境界相;因熏習鏡,一切世間境界悉於中現,常住一心,一切染法所不能染;法出離鏡,出煩惱礙、智礙,離和合相,淳淨明故;緣熏習鏡,遍照眾生之心,令修善根,隨念示現。四鏡即本覺體性之空、不空、出離、化用四面。

末論不覺與本覺之依存:「念無自相不離本覺,猶如迷人依方故迷,若離於方則無有迷。眾生亦爾,依覺故迷,若離覺性則無不覺。」不覺無自體,全依本覺而立;若離不覺之心,亦無真覺自相可說。覺與不覺相即不二,此為本論論述本覺之獨特理路。

大慧普覺禪師語錄T1998A · 諸宗部

《大慧普覺禪師語錄》對「本覺」之論述,並非孤單闡發其體性,而是環繞覺之全體大用展開,可歸納為數端。

一、以「始覺合本」釋成佛之義。本經明言:「始覺合本之謂佛。言以如今始覺合於本覺。」 此乃本經論本覺之核心框架。又云:「因始覺而合本覺。如禪和家,忽然摸著鼻孔,便是這箇道理。然此事人人分上無不具足。」 以「摸著鼻孔」喻頓悟本覺之親切現成,強調始覺與本覺並非隔別二事,始覺乃本覺之當下契證。

二、破邪師謬解以顯本覺當下。本經批判「以威音王那畔為本覺」之偏見云:「往往邪師輩。以無言默然為始覺。以威音王那畔為本覺。固非此理。既非此理,何者是覺?若全是覺,豈更有迷?若謂無迷,爭奈釋迦老子於明星現時忽然便覺知得自家本命元辰。元來在這裏。」 顯示本經反對將本覺推向時間上之遙遠過去,主張本覺即於明星現時當下可見之自家本來面目。

三、「性覺妙明。本覺明妙」之特殊對舉。本經引此四句——「性覺妙明。本覺明妙」——以性覺、本覺並列互照,強調覺性本具、自性光明之特質,為本經論本覺所用之特殊語彙形式。

四、本覺即本地風光本來面目。本經指出:「一切人脚跟下。無不圓成。無不具足。」 又引釋迦悟道後所說:「奇哉一切眾生。具有如來智慧德相。但以妄想執著。而不證得。」 並指士大夫病痛正在「妄想執著」。可知本覺即是眾生之「本地風光、本來面目」,本來具足,唯被妄想執著所遮障。

五、自覺覺他之大覺義。本經云:「既已自覺。而以此覺覺諸群迷。故曰大覺。」 此處大覺兼攝自覺與覺他,顯示本覺之全幅開顯即是大覺之體現。又以「覺軒」為喻,書末偈云:「覺空空覺空空。覺覺覺空空空亦空。」 進一步闡明覺與空相互蕩滌之無住境界。

六、「夢覺覺非。覺亦非覺」之無執。本經引德山語:「捫空追響。勞汝心神。夢覺覺非。覺亦非覺。」 提醒行者於「覺」之概念亦不可執著,覺相既非,覺體亦遣,方為真覺之究竟處。

Related