Dharma · AI Companion

非有想非無想處

naivasaṃjñānāsaṃjñāyatana

无色界最高的极微细定境AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么

In the Buddhist cosmic model and meditative taxonomy, the Sphere of Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception (*Fei You Xiang Fei Wu Xiang Chu* [非有想非無想處]; Sanskrit: *Naivasaṃjñānāsaṃjñāyatana*; also translated in Chinese canons as *Fei Xiang Fei Fei Xiang Ru Chu* [非想非非想入處]) represents the absolute summit of mundane meditative absorption (*dhyāna* / *samādhi*) and the boundary of conditioned existence (*saṃskṛta-dharma*).

To understand its position within the Buddhist path of liberation (*vimukti-mārga*), one must first grasp the ladder of mental refinement in the Four Formless Absorptions (*Si Wu Se Ding* [四無色定]):

1. Sphere of Infinite Space (*Kū-mugen-jo* / *Ākāśānantyāyatana*): Transcendence of physical form and physical boundaries. 2. Sphere of Infinite Consciousness (*Shiki-mugen-jo* / *Vijñānānantyāyatana*): Transcendence of outer space into pure, unlimited awareness. 3. Sphere of Nothingness (*Wu Suo You Chu* [無所有處] / *Ākiñcanyāyatana*): Transcendence of awareness itself, resting on the profound absence of objects ("there is nothing"). 4. Sphere of Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception (*Fei You Xiang Fei Wu Xiang Chu* [非有想非無想處]): The subtle boundary where perception (*saṃjñā*) is so attenuated that it cannot be called active "perception" (*Fei You Xiang* [非有想]), yet awareness has not completely ceased, so it cannot be called total "non-perception" (*Fei Wu Xiang* [非無想]).

1. "The Pinnacle of Existence" (*You Di Yi* [有第一]) and the Limit of Conditioned Mind

The early canons describe this state as "The Pinnacle of Existence" (*You Di Yi* [有第一]), the highest summit accessible to a sentient being still bound within the cycle of birth and death (*saṃsāra*). It is termed "the primary outer refuge of views" (*Di Yi Wai Yi Jian Chu* [第一外依見處]) because it marks the absolute edge of "having perception and having cognition" (*You Xiang You Zhi* [有想有知]).

At this level, coarse cognitive operations—labeling, conceptualizing, emotional reactivity—have completely dissolved. The mind rests in a state of exquisite, unwavering equanimity (*upekṣā*). The canonical texts describe this tranquility as a pure, singular joy born of unified equanimity (*She Yi Geng Le* [捨一更樂]).

Because the mental flame is dimmed to near extinction, the meditator in this state enters a realm "unreachable by Mara and Mara's realm" (*Mo Wang, Mo Wang Juan Shu Suo Bu Zhi Chu* [魔王、魔王眷屬所不至處]). It acts as a noble dwelling of peace (*Ren Shang Zhi Fa* [人上之法]) that protects the practitioner from chaotic, agonizing deaths (*Bu Fan Re Si* [不煩熱死]).

2. The Fatal Limitation: It is Still Conditioned (*Saṃskṛta*)

Despite its supreme peace, the Buddha drew a sharp, unequivocal line: **This state is still conditioned (*Saṃskṛta*), impermanent (*Anitya*), and inherently unsatisfactory (*Duḥkha*).**

In the *Madhyama Āgama* (Majjhima Nikāya parallel), the Buddha warns: > *"If a ascetic or brahmin transcends all spheres of nothingness and attains the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, thinking 'This is peaceful, this is sublime'... he must realize that this too is constructed (*saṃskṛta*). Whatever is constructed is impermanent; whatever is impermanent is suffering."*

Before his enlightenment, Siddhārtha Gautama studied under the renowned ascetic master Uddaka Rāmaputta (*Yu Tuo Luo Luo Ma Zi* [優陀羅羅摩子/欝陀羅羅摩子]), who taught that achieving this very sphere was the ultimate liberation (*nirvāṇa*). Siddhārtha mastered the state rapidly but abandoned it, recognizing that while it was exquisitely calm, "it does not lead to disillusionment, to dispassion, to cessation, to peace, to direct knowledge, to enlightenment, to Nirvāṇa."

If a practitioner clings to this subtle state—a subtle form of attachment called craving for the formless (*Wu Se Ai* [無色愛])—it becomes the ultimate "root of the boil" (*Yong Ben* [癰本]). Canonical anecdotes recall that after Uddaka Rāmaputta died having mastered this state, he was reborn in the Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception Heaven (*Fei You Xiang Fei Wu Xiang Chu Tian* [非有想非無想處天]) with an immense lifespan measured in eons. Yet, because the underlying latent tendencies (*anuśaya*) of self-clinging were never uprooted by liberating wisdom (*prajñā*), when that cosmic lifespan finally expired, he fell into lower realms, taking rebirth as a wild animal (a winged fox or jackal/wildcat in canonical folklore).

3. The Path of Transcendence: From Subtle Attachment to Liberation

To transform this worldly peak into a vehicle for liberation, the Buddhist contemplative must execute two crucial transitions:

* **Internal Mindfulness vs. External Drift (*Xin Zhu Nei* vs. *Xin Bu Zhu Nei*)**: If a practitioner becomes intoxicated by the subtle quietude—clinging to the "flavor of perceptionless wisdom" (*Wu Xiang Zhi Wei* [無想智味])—the mind is deemed "not abiding inwardly" (*Xin Bu Zhu Nei* [心不住內]). True inward mindfulness (*Xin Zhu Nei* [心住內]) requires experiencing the subtle stillness without relying on it, identifying with it, or binding oneself to it. * **Insight into the Five Aggregates (*Wu Yin* [五陰] / *Wu Yun* [五蘊])**: In the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, the Buddha outlines the contemplative key: Even within this formless realm, the meditator must dissect the remaining subtle aggregates—Form (subtle lingering residue), Feeling, Perception, Volitional Formations, and Consciousness—and contemplate them "as a disease, as a boil, as a thorn, as a murderer" (*Ru Bing, Ru Yong, Ru Ci, Ru Sha* [如病、如癰、如刺、如殺]). * The Final Step: By piercing through the illusion of selfhood in this peak state, the practitioner transcends it entirely to enter the Cessation of Perception and Feeling (*Xiang Shou Mie Ding* [想受滅定] / *Xiang Zhi Mie* [想知滅]), shattering all mental outflows (*āsava*) to realize genuine Nirvāṇa.


生活里的走查

While the *Sphere of Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception* is an advanced meditative state reached through deep *samādhi*, the underlying mental dynamics have subtle echoes in contemporary life. Modern people often mistake high-level mental absorption or emotional detachment for spiritual liberation. Let us trace a modern scenario to clarify these boundaries:

Scenario: The High-Altitude "Flow State" & Digital Immersion

Imagine a brilliant modern engineer or software architect working in hyper-focus late at night, or an experienced meditator at an isolated retreat:

1. Step 1: Leaving Coarse Forms (Transcending Physical Noise) * *Canonical Parallel*: Transcending physical form (*Rūpa*). * *Daily Experience*: You put on noise-canceling headphones, turn off all notifications, and tune out physical hunger, bodily posture, and room temperature. You enter deep immersion. 2. Step 2: Dissolving Outer Concepts (Approaching "Nothingness") * *Canonical Parallel*: Moving past the *Sphere of Infinite Space* and *Infinite Consciousness* into the *Sphere of Nothingness*. * *Daily Experience*: You stop thinking about your mortgage, family drama, or social media drama. The mind lets go of external world objects. It feels spacious, clean, and completely quiet. 3. Step 3: The Edge of Awareness (The Analog of "Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception") * *Canonical Parallel*: *Fei You Xiang Fei Wu Xiang Chu*. * *Daily Experience*: You drop into a state of effortless mind-wandering or vast white noise. You aren't active thinking (*Fei You Xiang*—no coarse thoughts or mental labels like "I am coding" or "I am meditating"), yet you are not unconscious or asleep (*Fei Wu Xiang*—there is a subtle, radiant thread of awareness keeping you suspended). It feels hyper-peaceful, completely detached, almost sacred.

Where the Modern Mind Misidentifies the State:

* The Trap of "I Have Awakened": Returning from this state, the practitioner thinks: *"I felt no ego, no anxiety, no world. I must have realized Emptiness or Nirvāṇa!"* * The Canonical Diagnosis: This is precisely what the sutras call taking "The Pinnacle of Existence" as ultimate liberation. The mental movement has merely become so micro-fine that the subtle "I" (the ego-construct) is floating silently in the background, suspended in the "flavor of perceptionless wisdom" (*Wu Xiang Zhi Wei* [無想智味]). * The Hidden Risk: When the deep focus breaks and daily chaos returns (an urgent email, a family argument), intense irritation flares up instantly. Why? Because the subtle latent tendencies (*anuśaya*) of self-attachment were never dismantled; they were merely placed on pause inside an artificial, controlled micro-climate.


当代人为什么需要它

Why does a concept describing ancient deep-trance mechanics matter to contemporary readers navigating algorithms, AI tools, and hyper-stimulated work environments?

1. A Diagnostic Tool for "Psychological Detachment" and Avoidance Modern culture frequently fetishizes emotional numbness, hyper-rational detachment, or state-based escapes (flooding the brain with white noise, extreme sensory deprivation, or intense flow states) as "mindfulness." The doctrine of *Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception* serves as a profound warning: Absence of chaotic thought is not the presence of liberating wisdom. You can numb or refine cognitive noise to near zero, but if self-clinging remains, suffering (*duḥkha*) is merely waiting for the state to end.

2. Deconstructing the Limits of "Algorithmic & AI Abstraction" Contemporary computational analogies often compare human consciousness to information processing. Neural networks compress data into high-dimensional latent spaces where coarse features disappear into micro-mathematical weights. *Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception* is like the ultimate latent space of human consciousness—where raw sensory data is compressed to its absolute minimum. Yet, Buddhism reminds us that even the most refined computational or mental architecture, if conditioned (*saṃskṛta*), remains impermanent and subject to decay.

3. Demystifying Spiritual Experiences Many contemporary spiritual seekers fall into "spiritual bypassing"—using profound altered states of consciousness, peak experiences, or deep meditative calm to evade unhealed psychological wounds or relational duties. Knowing that even the highest realm of existence (*You Di Yi*) was rejected by the Buddha as incomplete prevents seekers from mistaking temporary mental tranquility for genuine liberation.


常见误读与澄清

To maintain absolute fidelity to the canonical definitions, we must untangle several persistent misconceptions:

1. Misconception: "Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception" means the mind has completely stopped working or hit Nirvāṇa.

* Correction: It is not Nirvāṇa, nor is it total mental cessation. Total mental cessation occurs only in The Cessation of Perception and Feeling (*Xiang Shou Mie Ding* [想受滅定]), which is an unconditioned state accessible only to noble ones (*āryas*). In *Neither-Perception-Nor-Non-Perception*, extremely subtle volitional formations (*saṃskāra*) and consciousness (*vijñāna*) are still active. It remains a conditioned, worldly realm (*saṃskṛta-dharma*).

2. Misconception: Equating "Perception" (*Xiang* / *Saṃjñā*) with general "Thoughts" or "Ideas".

* Correction: In Buddhist Abhidharma, *Saṃjñā* (*Xiang* [想]) specifically means the cognitive mental function of taking signs, recognizing features, and labeling objects (e.g., identifying "blue," "table," "good," "bad"). *Fei You Xiang* means the mind no longer active picks up signs or attaches labels to objects; *Fei Wu Xiang* means the potential for recognition and subtle background cognitive capacity still lingeringly exists.

3. Misconception: Viewing this state as a useless "trap" that meditators should completely avoid.

* Correction: Early Buddhist canons emphasize that when approached with correct view (*samyag-dṛṣṭi*), mastering this state yields "great fruit and great benefit" (*Da Guo Da Fu Li* [大果大福利]). It offers an unshakeable foundation of mental stability free from Mara’s disturbances. The danger lies not in the state itself, but in clinging to its flavor (*Wu Xiang Zhi Wei* [無想智味]) and generating false views of a permanent Self (*ātman*). When a practitioner applies the insight observation—viewing the subtle aggregates within it "as a disease, as a boil, as a thorn, as a murderer"—it becomes the ultimate springboard into full liberation (*arahantship*).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「非有想非无想处」(梵语:naivasaṃjñānāsaṃjñāyatana)是佛教宇宙观与禅定体系中无色界禅定的最高境界,也是世间有情存在与执着的极限。在经典的论述中,此处代表着「有想有知」的边际,被视为「第一外依见处、最依见处」。在此状态下,众生的心识极为微细,既非世俗粗重的「有想」,亦非完全无知觉的「无想」。尽管此定境代表了世间禅定的最高成就与极致安乐,但佛教经典一致强调,它依然属于「有为法」的范畴,具有无常、苦的本质,若对此产生执着,仍会成为生死轮回与邪见的根源。因此,超越此处、证得漏尽涅槃,是佛教修行者最终的追求。

二、 主要阐述

1. 禅定功德与世间安乐

在修持层面,成就此定具有极大的功德与安乐。首先,得此定者的境界是「魔王、魔王眷属所不至处」,能远离魔罗的干扰。在圣法律的修行序列中,此定被列为「渐损」之行,亦是「人上之法」的一种安乐住止,能令修行者在临终时达到「不烦热死、不烦热命终」的安稳状态。此外,此定境所伴随的舍受极其纯净,属于「舍一更乐,不若干更乐」的高级体验。若比丘能使心与此处相应,并依凭「远离、无欲、依灭、向于舍」来修习念觉分乃至舍觉分,则能获得「大果大福利」。

2. 有为局限与执着之害

尽管非有想非无想处极为殊胜,但佛陀明确指出其本质上的局限性。此定「故是有为。若有为者,则是无常,若无常者,即是苦也」。若修行者因证得此定而产生骄慢,「自贵贱他」,则属于「不真人法」;应当认识到此定亦是「无量种,若有计者是谓爱也」。

经典中以「优陀罗罗摩子」(或译「欝陀罗罗摩子」)为反面典型。他误以此处为最妙的止息与解脱,因执著于此身与此境,死后虽然往生至非有想非无想天,但寿尽之后依然堕落为狸。佛陀指出,这种对极高定境的执着属于「无色爱」,是痛苦的根源(「痈本」)。佛陀自述在示现成佛前,曾随优陀罗罗摩子修行并亲自证得此法,但因其「不趣智,不趣觉,不趣涅槃」而予以舍弃,进而寻求真正的漏尽解脱。

此外,凡夫(沙门、梵志)因缺乏无漏智慧,容易在此处起「神」(自我)执,计度此境界即是自我或为自我所有;而圣弟子则能如实了知其「非是神,非神所」。在邪见的依凭上,若修行者在此极高境界中产生「我死后断坏、无所有」的认知,便会堕入「我正断」的断见之中。

3. 禅定修持的心相与转换

在具体的禅修实践中,修行者在非有想非无想处的微细心相与转换至关重要: * 心住内与不住内:若比丘在此定中「识着无想智味,依彼住彼,缘彼缚彼」,则属于「心不住内」的执着状态;反之,若能「不着无想智味,不依彼不住彼,不缘彼不缚彼」,则属于真正的「心住内」。 * 禅定转换的偏差:修行者在「无所有处」与「非有想非无想处」之间转换时,心念极易出现偏差。例如,若在无所有处时思惟其余小想,修习非有想非无想处道,却误以为这已经是胜妙的息寂而导致失定,这在禅相上被称为「衰退而谓炽盛」;反之,若能如实了知其转换的微细心相,则能保持定力不失。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部派与经典译本中,对于该概念及其关联术语的表述存在明显的差异:

1. 核心译名: * 《中阿含经》(《中阿含經》)将此概念译为「非有想非无想处」,其对应的天界译为「非有想非无想处天」。 * 《杂阿含经》(《雜阿含經》)则将其译为「非想非非想入处」,并将其统摄于「四无色定」之中。

2. 定位与序列术语: * 《中阿含经》将此处定位为「二处」中的「第二处」;在八解脱的修持序列中,将其称为「第七方」;将对该定境的微细执著称为「无想智味」。 * 《杂阿含经》则将此境界所代表的生命存在极致状态称为「有第一」。

3. 超越境界的表述: * 《中阿含经》将超越此处的最高定境(想受灭定)表述为「想知灭身触成就游」或「想知灭尽身触成就游」。 * 《杂阿含经》在论及对此定境的观照时,使用的是「五阴」(色、受、想、行、识)这一术语,并将观照其无常苦空的修行方法表述为「如病、如痈、如刺、如杀」。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与「无所有处」的关系: 非有想非无想处是修行者度过一切「无所有处」(或「无所有入处」)之后所成就游的更高境界。两者在禅定转换过程中存在极为微细的心念起伏,修行者需如实知其转换,方能不失定力。

2. 与「想受灭定(想知灭)」的关系: 若修行者对非有想非无想处存有「乐欲住」,命终后将投生至「非有想非无想处天」。若要获得彻底的解脱,必须进一步度越此境界,达到「想知灭(尽)身触成就游」,这才是诸定中「最第一、最大、最上、最胜、最妙」的境界,能彻底断除生老病死等一切苦。

3. 与「五阴(五蕴)」的关系: 在《杂阿含经》的无漏禅观中,修行者不应仅仅安住于非想非非想入处,而应当对该定境中的「色、受、想、行、识」五阴进行思惟,视其「如病、如痈、如刺、如杀」。若能如此如实观照,则能断除执着,向「上流般涅槃」迈进;若不能进行此无漏观照,则只能随世间业因往生到因性果实天、福生天或少福天等天界。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》卷五十四(关于有为无常的论述): 「若有沙门、梵志度一切无所有处,得非有想非无想处成就游。彼作是思:『此寂静,此微妙,谓度一切无所有处,得非有想非无想处成就游。』彼如是知、如是见。阿难!多闻圣弟子作是思:『若有沙门、梵志度一切无所有处,得非有想非无想处成就游……彼亦故是有为。若有为者,则是无常,若无常者,即是苦也。』」

2. 《杂阿含经》卷三十四(关于「有第一」与超越的论述): 「尊者阿难问尊者跋陀罗:『云何,尊者跋陀罗!有第一?』尊者跋陀罗答言:『尊者阿难!若众生度一切无所有入处,具足安住非想非非想入处,若起、若生,是名有第一。』尊者阿难言:『尊者跋陀罗!汝说有第一,我亦说有第一。然其差别,若有比丘度一切无所有入处,具足安住非想非非想入处,如实观察,次第尽诸漏,是名有第一。』」

3. 《中阿含经》卷二十四(关于心住内与不住内的论述): 「若比丘识着无想智味,依彼住彼,缘彼缚彼者,是谓心不住内。……若比丘不着无想智味,不依彼不住彼,不缘彼不缚彼者,是谓心住内。」

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論及此概念時,採用的術語形式為「有想無想處」,而非其他經典常見之「非有想非無想處」,此乃本經獨特之用語習慣,撰集歸一之時應予留意。又與此相鄰之更高定境,本經稱為「想知滅定」,亦與常見之「滅盡定」一名不同。

據《長阿含經》所載,「有想無想處」位列「九眾生居」之一,由舍利弗於佛前闡說如來正法時列舉而出,屬於無色界中極微細之定境。舍利弗以此九眾生居與十無學正法並列,說明如來所說正法之內容,囑諸比丘當共撰集記錄,以防諍訟,使梵行久立,多所饒益,天、人獲安。

就修行次第而言,《長阿含經》詳細描述禪定層層深入與觀想因緣生滅之過程:從第四禪捨一切色想、滅瞋、不念異想而入空處;越空處入識處;越識處入不用處;捨不用處即入有想無想處;最後捨有想無想處入「想知滅定」。每一層次之想皆「有因緣想生,有因緣想滅」,前一層之想滅,後一層之想方生,顯示此等定境非恆常之法,皆從緣起、從緣而滅,「有想無想處」即居於此次第倒數第二階,前承不用處,後通想知滅定。

特為重要者,《長阿含經》詳述「有想無想處」之微細用心:行者住此定後,得此微妙之想,便作是念:「有念為惡,無念為善。」然而當彼作此念時,微妙想不滅,反生更麤之想。行者復自思惟:「我今寧可不為念行,不起思惟。」乃至真正不為念行、不起思惟之時,微妙想滅,麤想亦不生,即於此刻入「想知滅定」。此段文字凸顯「有想無想處」其想極其微細,難以直覺覺察,且不能以強念強捨對治,必須透過不為念行、不起思惟之無作方式,方令微想自然消滅而更進一步。經中對此段微妙過程反覆敷演,顯示此定之精深程度已非常人所能揣度。

又,梵志對佛陀所說之「次第滅想因緣」自白:「從本已來信自不聞如是次第滅想因緣」,可見此層層深入的禪觀次第開示,於當時亦屬難得聞之法義。

綜上所述,《長阿含經》以「有想無想處」一名標示此無色界最高定境,將其置於禪觀次第之倒數第二階,前接不用處,後通想知滅定,並詳述其微細心想之淨除過程,強調一切想皆因緣所生、因緣所滅。其獨特用語與所述之微細工夫過程,與側重業報受生等角度之其他經典有所不同。

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》以「非有想非無想處」一名稱此定境,常綴以「成就遊」、「成就遊者」、「非有想非無想處天」等表述。其定位有數層:

一、定階序列中的最高位:本經反覆以初禪乃至第四禪,再加空處、識處、無所有處、非有想非無想處為四無色定之次第,非有想非無想處居其末,稱「度一切無所有處,非有想非無想,是非有想非無想處成就遊」,亦稱之為「第七方」、「第二處」(與無想天並列為二處)。

二、超越此境之上的還有一境,稱「想知滅身觸成就遊」、「想知滅盡身觸成就遊,慧觀漏盡斷智」,本經明言「彼諸定中,此定說最第一、最大、最上、最勝、最妙」,但同時強調由此更進一步方為漏盡解脫。

三、修行歷程中的預流:本經記載佛自述曾「度一切無所有處,得非有想非無想處成就遊」,但自覺「此法不趣智,不趣覺,不趣涅槃」,遂捨之另求無上安隱。又以烏陀夷(優陀羅羅摩子之師)為例,其以非有想非無想處為最妙而執著之。本經以此明示:此定雖上,猶屬有為、有漏,非究竟涅槃。

四、附著之患:本經特出之處在多處警告對「無想智味」的執取,如「彼識著無想智味,依彼住彼,緣彼縛彼,識不住內」;並設「真人法、不真人法」之辨,謂因得此定而起自貴賤他之心為不真人法,當觀「世尊說無量種,若有計者是謂愛也」。

五、此境亦列於「漸損」修法之一階、魔王眷屬所不至處,並在「知如真則不染著」之教說中,與七識住並列為當知之對象。又與其他定境同列於「一切非是神」之觀中,顯示其為所緣而非主體。

六、生處與還來:本經指成就此定者命終生非有想非無想天,福盡仍可下生,烏陀夷之師即因「身壞命終,生非有想非無想天中,彼壽盡已,復來此間,生於狸中」,以示執此非究竟。

本經論此概念之特色,在於以「成就遊」標示其定境形態、以「想知滅」標示更高一境、並反覆以佛陀自身經驗與外道執著之批判為鑒,強調此雖為定中最勝,猶非涅槃。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》以「非想非非想入處」一語指稱此無色界最高的極微細定境,其論述散見於三處,茲歸納如下。

其一,此經將非想非非想入處與前三無色定——空入處、識入處、無所有入處——並列,構成完整的四無色定序列。在破斥邪見的語境中,此四入處被外道執為「我」之所依,認為若得此定,死後斷壞無所有,即為「我正斷」。此處顯示,非想非非想入處在當時已被視為修行者可達之極致定境,故執此定為真我、執其後壞為究竟解脫之邪見亦隨之而生。

其二,本經以「有第一」之說闡明此定境之特殊地位。尊者跋陀羅指出:「有眾生度一切無所有入處,非想非非想入處具足住,若起彼有者,是名有第一」,明此定為「有」之最勝。然此處存有兩種詮釋:世俗之見同於婆羅門梵天之說,尊者阿難則以「如實觀察,次第盡諸漏,是名有第一」對治之,顯示於此定中如實觀察,方能究竟斷盡諸漏。

其三,此經亦強調修習此定之功德。經云:「若比丘修空入處,多修習已,得大果大福利」,並明示修習時當「修念覺分,依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨;乃至修捨覺分,依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨」。此經又云:「如修空入處,如是識入處、無所有入處、非想非非想入處三經,亦如上說」,顯示非想非非想入處之修法結構與前三入處相同,多修習亦得大果大福利。

術語方面,《雜阿含經》一律以「非想非非想入處」稱此定境,與「空入處」「識入處」「無所有入處」共構成「四無色入處」之完整序列,並未出現「非想非非想處」或其他異名。此經以「入處」而非單獨「處」字標示此類定境,顯示其術語之統一性。

Related