Dharma · AI Companion

業自在

karma-vaśitā

菩萨于身口意业得自在,能随意造作诸业,于业果受生亦得自由。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

业自在须借无生法忍之性空立足(2);于世间随意造作、受生自由属从空出假的自在示现(3)

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

業自在 (karma-vaśitā, "mastery over karma") means, literally, "freedom with regard to karma." "Karma" (業) refers to the three karmas of body, speech, and mind—the fabrications of the body, the fabrications of speech, the fabrications of thought. "Freedom" (自在, vaśitā) here does not mean "doing whatever one pleases," but a deep freedom whose inner dynamics have already been transformed. In classical terms, it is a power accomplished "by the perfection of the discipline pāramitā" (由戒度圓滿).

This concept is not simple, because different treatises place it in different frameworks, and each framework enriches its meaning. We need to see at least three layers of structure:

Layer One: Karma-vaśitā and birth-vaśitā as a causal pair.

The *Mahāyānasaṃgraha-bhāṣya* (《攝大乘論釋》, Paramārtha's translation) lists "karma-vaśitā" (業自在) and "birth-vaśitā" (生自在) as two adjacent items among the ten vaśitās (十自在), treating them as a causal pair:

- The essence of karma-vaśitā is "because one can restrain the karma of body and speech" (由能制身口業故)—able to master one's own fabrications of body and speech. This sounds plain, but note the word "restrain" (制伏): not suppression, not prohibition, but that when body and speech are about to move, they are no longer driven by habit, affliction, or latent tendencies, but governed by a lucid will. - The function of karma-vaśitā is "if one wishes to take a future rebirth, one can at will evoke it, causing that karma to manifest" (若欲受餘生,如意能引,此業悉令現前)—if the bodhisattva wishes to take birth somewhere in the future, he can at will evoke the corresponding karma and make it appear. This is freedom at the causal stage (因地). - Birth-vaśitā then follows one step further along this line: relying on the power of karma-vaśitā, the bodhisattva also attains freedom with respect to the "birth" that karmic retribution brings about—able to take rebirth at will among the six realms, and when the work of liberating beings is done, able to abandon birth at will; both taking and letting go function without obstruction. This is freedom at the fruition stage (果地).

Taken together, karma-vaśitā is both "I can make body, speech, and mind produce the karma I want" and "I can choose which karma brings about birth, and where" —the former is freedom at the causal stage, the latter at the fruition stage.

Layer Two: Karma-vaśitā is accomplished by the perfection of moral discipline.

This is the statement most easily overlooked by modern readers: "The four karma-vaśitās and five birth-vaśitās are accomplished by the perfection of moral discipline" (四業自在、五生自在,此二由戒度圓滿得成).

Why must "freedom" be accomplished by "discipline" (戒, śīla)? On the surface it seems contradictory: discipline is restraint, freedom is freedom—how can restraint give rise to freedom?

Here "discipline" is not obedience to external rules, but the bodhisattva's moral practice having been internalized to the point where no thought arising in body, speech, or mind deviates from the nature of reality (法性, dharmatā). When this internalization reaches its limit, it is no longer "restraint"—it is precisely freedom. It is like a musician so skilled that he no longer needs to "remind himself how to play"; his hands are naturally in the right place. Karma-vaśitā is freedom in this sense: "no need for deliberation, naturally in accord with the measure."

Therefore, reading karma-vaśitā as "I can do whatever I want" is a fundamental misreading. The "freedom" of karma-vaśitā is precisely built on the foundation that "no fabrication of body, speech, or mind deviates from the true Dharma."

Layer Three: Karma-vaśitā is an achievement of the advanced bodhisattva stages.

The classics mention at least three formulations of the stages:

- In the context of the ten grounds (十地, daśabhūmi, the bodhisattva's progressive stages), the *Mahāyānasaṃgraha-bhāṣya* says: "By the meaning of karma-vaśitā as a support, by the meaning of mastery over the dhāraṇī gate and the samādhi gate as a support, one should know the dharma-realm" (由業自在依止義、由陀羅尼門三摩提門自在依止義,應知法界)—karma-vaśitā is one of the supports by which the bodhisattva penetrates the dharma-realm (法界, dharmadhātu, the true nature of all dharmas); by obtaining the three karmas of the Buddhas (諸佛三業, the pure activities of body, speech, and mind), the bodhisattva can transform and deliver beings in the ten directions. This is the deepest layer of its meaning: it is not an isolated "ability," but a support for penetrating the dharma-realm itself. - In the distinction between shallow practice and deep practice in the *Mahāyānasaṃgraha-bhāṣya*: a bodhisattva of shallow practice, when doing deeds that benefit beings, must first make a vow, enter true contemplation, and only after emerging from contemplation act according to his wish; a bodhisattva of deep practice, by the power of his original vow, accomplishes whatever he wishes immediately, without needing to make a fresh vow or to enter and emerge from contemplation. This is the same freedom manifesting at different depths. - In the sequence of "four vaśitās" in the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* (《大乘莊嚴經論》)—vaśitā of non-discrimination (無分別自在), vaśitā of buddha-fields (剎土自在), vaśitā of wisdom (智自在), and karma-vaśitā (業自在)—karma-vaśitā corresponds to the Dharma-cloud ground (法雲地, dharmameghā-bhūmi, the highest of the ten grounds), with the core statement: "because the karma of superknowledges is unobstructed" (由諸通業無障礙故). Note: this "karma" does not refer to karma in general, but specifically to "the karma of superknowledges" (通業)—those activities that produce salvific wonders and are blocked by no obstacle. In the context of the "four kinds of birth" (四受生)—karma-power birth (業力生), vow-power birth (願力生), concentration-power birth (定力生), and superknowledge-power birth (通力生)—there is also "karma-power birth," specifically referring to bodhisattvas on the ground of faith and practice (信行地) who, "with freedom of karma-power, take birth wherever they wish" (業力自在,隨所欲處而受生).

Taken together, karma-vaśitā is not a state an initial practitioner can "cultivate to," but a merit that can only be perfected at the deepest bodhisattva stages. For ordinary people reading this concept, it is more like taking a lighthouse as a waymark—the lighthouse is not a destination to reach, but a light in the distance that lets us calibrate our direction.

Walking It Through in Daily Life

For ordinary beings like us, karma-vaśitā is not a question of "whether I can do it now," but "how clearly do I see what drives me?" Let us walk this thread through several contemporary scenarios.

Scenario One: The phone on the commute.

On the morning subway, you tell yourself, "this morning I need to focus on writing that report," but your fingers have already opened a social app, and you only realize it twenty minutes later. You are a bit annoyed at yourself.

In classical language, this scroll today is not "what you chose"—it is the habitual activation of countless similar past fabrications (karma). You are a passenger pulled by your own karma, not the driver. This is precisely the state of being propelled by karma in "karma-power birth": we think we are the agents, when in fact we are pushed along by eons of habit.

So what does the opposite of karma-vaśitā—even in fragment—look like? Even for one second, when your finger reaches for the screen and you are clearly aware of "what I am doing now, and why"—that "clarity" is a sliver of light from "restraining the karma of body and speech." Karma-vaśitā is not about never scrolling again; it is that when you do scroll, there is no longer any invisible driving force behind it.

Scenario Two: The words that slip out in an intimate relationship.

You are arguing with your partner; a sentence bursts out and wounds them. Later you think, "that is not what I meant"—but your mouth said it.

The classics single out the two karmas of "body and speech" because these two are the most likely to "move before awareness." Most of us "intend" to do the right thing at the level of consciousness, but at the level of body and speech, emotion and pattern get there first. This is why "restraining the karma of body and speech" matters—what it cultivates is not right versus wrong, but taking the steering wheel back from habit.

Scenario Three: Late night at work.

At 11 PM, you are still replying to emails. Not because the work is truly urgent, but because "I cannot stop; if I stop, it means I am not good enough / I will be abandoned / I will fail." Behind this compulsion to "keep going" is an invisible karmic force driving you.

In the state of karma-vaśitā, the bodhisattva acts "by vow-power"—clearly knowing why one acts, for whom, and when to stop. A person driven by karma acts "by inertia"—unable to stop, and not knowing why they cannot.

Note a place where the mapping is easily mistaken: karma-vaśitā does not mean "the will to act grows weak." On the contrary, the deep-practice bodhisattva "accomplishes whatever he wishes" (隨所欲作一切皆成)—he does more, more precisely, more unhindered; it is only that there is no unconscious driving force in it.

Scenario Four: The algorithmic recommendation you scroll into.

The platform pushes a video based on your past behavioral data, and you unconsciously watch another thirty minutes. Strictly speaking, this is not the opposite of karma-vaśitā—the algorithm is not your karma. But it can serve as an external metaphor: have you noticed that platform recommendations "work" because they precisely hit the habitual patterns already inside you?

Your inner "karma" is like your algorithm's training set—every thought you have had, every choice you have made, every catchphrase you repeat is writing the script for "what drives you" today. The modern metaphor for karma-vaśitā is: become the one who can edit their own training set.

Scenario Five: Witnessing others suffer.

You see a news item; someone is suffering. Your heart tightens; you forward, comment, express anger—and then?

Karma-vaśitā is not "indifference," not "non-response." The shallow-practice bodhisattva "makes a vow first"; the deep-practice bodhisattva "by original vow-power does as he wishes"—the difference is not whether there is a response, but whether the response arises from a clear vow-power, or from another kind of inertia.

Why Contemporary People Need It

Our generation has grown numb to the word "freedom"—freedom in every sense has been spoken of. But in most contemporary contexts, "freedom" is essentially "the number of choices increases," not "the source of choice becomes clear."

Karma-vaśitā proposes a completely different dimension: true freedom is not "I can choose A or B," but "I can see where the tug between A and B comes from." Even if choices are many, if every option arises from ignorance (無明, avidyā), that "freedom" is an expanded cage—more like a room with more doors, but every door opens to the same lock.

This is especially glaring in the contemporary context:

- We have near-infinite "content freedom," but what we can put down grows less and less. - We have career-choice freedom, but the very matter of "which career to choose" is often predetermined by family expectations, social evaluation, and class anxiety. - We have freedom in intimate relationships, but after "free love" we still repeat the familiar patterns of childhood.

Karma-vaśitā, as a bodhisattva-grade perfected state, means for ordinary people not "I too must attain this," but three things:

First, it provides a genuinely referenceable model of "freedom"—not more choices, but a clearer source.

Second, it reminds us: freedom and discipline are not antonyms. True freedom is not "I can break the rules," but "I have internalized to the point where I no longer need to break the rules"—just as a truly free person does not need to violate rules to prove their freedom.

Third, it repositions "practice" (修行) from an ascetic kind of restraint to a thorough cleanup of inner inertia. In the age of algorithms and commodified attention, this is more urgent than ever.

Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: "Karma-vaśitā means doing whatever you want."

The most common and most fatal misreading. In the classical statement, the condition for karma-vaśitā is "accomplished by the perfection of moral discipline"—its freedom is because it can no longer do wrong, not because it can ignore right and wrong. Reading it backwards degrades the Dharma into "premium willfulness."

Misreading Two: "Karma-vaśitā is supernormal powers."

Supernormal powers (神通, abhijñā, the marvelous powers of perception and action) concern "seeing/doing what ordinary people cannot"; karma-vaśitā concerns "the fabrications of one's own body, speech, and mind have been thoroughly purified, no longer driven by any defilement." The former emphasizes the extension of function; the latter, the source of motivation. Reading karma-vaśitā as supernormal powers is like reading "I am no longer pushed by afflictions" as "I can move objects with my mind"—two entirely different things.

Misreading Three: "Karma-vaśitā and birth-vaśitā are the same thing."

In the classics they are paired as "karma as cause, birth as fruit" (業為因、生為果). Karma-vaśitā emphasizes "I can evoke the karma I want"; birth-vaśitā emphasizes "I can choose where to be born by that karma, and can abandon birth." The former is freedom at the causal stage; the latter, freedom at the fruition stage. To accomplish birth-vaśitā, one must first accomplish karma-vaśitā.

Misreading Four: "Karma-vaśitā equals karma-power birth."

The *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* has the term "karma-power birth" (業力生), specifically referring to bodhisattvas on the ground of faith and practice who, "with freedom of karma-power, take birth wherever they wish" (業力自在,隨所欲處而受生)—this is the concrete manifestation of karma-vaśitā in the matter of taking birth. But the same treatise also has "vow-power birth, concentration-power birth, superknowledge-power birth"—the four mechanisms of birth are different. Karma-vaśitā is not equivalent to "taking birth by karma-power"; it can function in coordination with vow-power, concentration-power, and superknowledge-power.

Misreading Five: "Ordinary people can cultivate to karma-vaśitā in this lifetime."

Karma-vaśitā is a merit accomplished at the deepest bodhisattva stages, at the ten grounds (especially the Dharma-cloud ground)—not a "destination" that an ordinary practitioner can "cultivate to" in a single lifetime. Treating it as a short-term practice goal is dishonest to oneself and to the Dharma. Treating it as a direction one can approach without limit, a coordinate by which to calibrate the mind—that use is more appropriate.

Misreading Six: "Karma-vaśitā only concerns body and speech, not mind."

The classical phrase "because one can restrain the karma of body and speech" emphasizes body and speech, but the "three karmas" themselves include mental karma (意業, mano-karma). Body and speech are singled out because these two domains are the most likely to "move before awareness." But the ultimate point of karma-vaśitā necessarily includes the purification of mental karma—which is also why, in the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra*, "karma-vaśitā" is listed in a same-stage sequential relationship with "mind-vaśitā" (意自在) and "feeling-vaśitā" (受自在)—the former established through the transformation of mind, feeling, and discrimination (意、受、分別).


Finally, back to one sentence: karma-vaśitā is not a checklist for us ordinary beings to say "I can do this," but a way of seeing that—most of the time—we are not the ones living our own lives. Seeing this itself is already a small sprout of "karma-vaśitā."

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

业自在(karma-vaśitā),谓菩萨于身口意诸业得自在之力,能随意造作诸业,并依此力于业果所感之受生处所亦得自由。此自在涵摄制伏身口业之能、随意引发诸业之力,以及于受生取舍之间无碍之功德。

2. 主要阐述

《摄大乘论释(真谛译)》从两个脉络展开:

(一)十地阶位中的业自在。论于十地说「由业自在依止义、由陀罗尼门三摩提门自在依止义,应知法界」。以通达法界为业自在之依止,谓菩萨由得诸佛三业,能化度十方众生,成就三身三业,故名业自在;由得陀罗尼门、三摩提门,如来一切秘密法藏如意通达,亦名自在。

(二)十自在中的业自在与生自在。菩萨于诸地得十自在,其中「四业自在、五生自在,此二由戒度圆满得成」。业为因、生为果,二者配立相应。「由能制身口业故,得业自在」——菩萨欲受何种余生,皆能随意引发,使该业悉现前。生自在则依业自在之力,于业果所感之生亦得自在,能随意往生六道之中,度生事毕亦能随意舍生,取舍二事功能无碍。 此外,论中区分浅行与深行菩萨之别:浅行者欲作众生利益事,先发愿,发愿竟入真观,出观后随欲方遂;深行者但由本愿力,随所欲作一切皆成,不须现前发愿及入观出观。

《大乘庄严经论》则从两条脉络论述:

(一)四种自在的脉络。论先说「意、受、分别」三者转变,即能次第获得无分别自在、刹土自在、智自在与业自在。「业自在」为四自在中的第四项,原文以「无分别、刹土、智、业」为固定次第。此四自在配属后三地:不动地成就无分别自在与刹土自在,善慧地成就智自在,法云地成就业自在;法云地之业自在以「由诸通业无障碍故」为核心表述,着重诸通业的运用没有障碍。

(二)四种受生的脉络。论列四种受生:业力生、愿力生、定力生、通力生。其中「业力生」指信行地菩萨「业力自在」,能「随所欲处而受生」,依其自在业力随所欲往之处受生。其余三种受生各有不同:愿力生是入大地菩萨为成熟他者能受畜生等生;定力生是得定菩萨能舍上界而于下界受生;通力生是得神通菩萨能于兜率天等示现诸相而受生。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

两部论典虽皆用「业自在」一词,然所系阶位与架构不同:《摄大乘论释(真谛译)》系于十地及十自在,由戒度圆满而得,并与生自在配立为因果一对;《大乘庄严经论》系于法云地(四自在脉络)及信行地(四受生脉络),与其他三自在并列,且以「诸通业无障碍」为法云地业自在之核心表述,不同于他处泛称任意造业者。

《大乘庄严经论》内部亦使用多个相关语词:「业自在」专见于四种自在及法云地之说明;「业力自在」见于信行地菩萨之业力受生;「业力生」为四受生之首。三者虽共同表现自在作用,却分属不同论述架构,在阶位、因由与受生类型上各有区别,不应混同。

此外,真谛译《摄大乘论释》为本概念主要汉译来源之一,此处所见为真谛译本之表述。

4. 与相关概念之关系

(一)业自在与生自在:业自在为因,生自在为果,二者配立。业自在能随意引发诸业令现前;生自在依业自在之力于业果所感之受生中得自由,能随意往生六道,亦能随意舍生。

(二)业自在与戒波罗蜜:业自在由戒度圆满而成就,以制伏身口诸业为其体性。

(三)业自在与陀罗尼门、三摩提门自在:于十地中同为通达法界之依止义。

(四)业自在与其他自在:于十自在中与定自在(入、住、出自在)、通慧自在(变异、折伏、通达自在)并列;于《庄严经论》四自在中与无分别自在、刹土自在、智自在并列,于意、受、分别三者转变后次第成就。

(五)业力生与愿力生、定力生、通力生:四者并列为四种受生类型,业力生不可径与愿力、定力或通力受生混同。

5. 代表性原文引用

- 「由业自在依止义、由陀罗尼门三摩提门自在依止义,应知法界。」 - 「由能制身口业故,得业自在。」 - 「由戒度圆满,若欲受余生,如意能引,此业悉令现前,故名业自在。」 - 「由业自在,于业果生中亦得自在,随六道类如意往生,利益若竟如意能舍。」 - 「由诸通业无障碍故」(说明法云地业自在之核心因由)。 - 信行地菩萨「业力自在」,「随所欲处而受生」。

By SutraAI-generated

攝大乘論釋(真諦譯)T1595 · 瑜伽部

《攝大乘論釋(真諦譯)》論述「業自在」,主要從兩個脈絡展開:

一、十地階位中的業自在。論於十地說「由業自在依止義、由陀羅尼門三摩提門自在依止義,應知法界」。釋中以通達法界為業自在之依止,謂菩薩由得諸佛三業,能化度十方眾生,成就三身三業,故名業自在;由得陀羅尼門、三摩提門,如來一切祕密法藏如意通達,亦名自在。

二、十自在中的業自在與生自在。菩薩於諸地得十自在,其中「四業自在、五生自在,此二由戒度圓滿得成」。業為因、生為果,二者配立相應。就體性而言,「由能制身口業故,得業自在」——菩薩能制伏身口諸業,由此成就業自在。其具體功用為:「由戒度圓滿,若欲受餘生,如意能引,此業悉令現前,故名業自在」——菩薩欲受何種餘生,皆能隨意引發,使該業悉現前。

與業自在配立的是生自在:「由業自在,於業果生中亦得自在,隨六道類如意往生,利益若竟如意能捨」。意即依業自在之力,於業果所感之生亦得自在,能隨意往生六道之中,度生事畢亦能隨意捨生。取捨二事功能無礙,故名生自在。

此外,此經將業自在納入十自在之整體架構,與定自在(於定得入、住、出自在)、通慧自在(得變異、折伏、通達自在)並列。論中區分淺行與深行菩薩之別:淺行者欲作眾生利益事,現在先發願,發願竟入真觀,出觀後隨欲方遂;深行者但由本願力,隨所欲作一切皆成,不須現前發願及入觀出觀。

此經所用主要術語為「業自在」、「生自在」、「戒度(或戒波羅蜜)圓滿」、「三業」、「通達法界」、「十自在」。其立義以「業自在」與「生自在」為因果相對之配立,由戒度圓滿而得制身口業之力,並於受生、取捨之間皆得自在;於十地中則以通達法界為依止,攝諸佛三業以化度十方眾生。

大乘莊嚴經論T1604 · 瑜伽部

《大乘莊嚴經論》從「四種自在」與「四種受生」兩條脈絡論述「業自在」,呈現菩薩於作用及受生方面皆能隨意而行的意義,但兩處所繫的階位與用語並不相同,宜分別記錄。

一、在四種自在的脈絡中,論先說「意、受、分別」三者轉變,即能次第獲得無分別自在、剎土自在、智自在與業自在。此處「業自在」是四自在中的第四項,原文以「無分別、剎土、智、業」為固定次第,並非單獨提出的一般能力。

二、四種自在配屬於後三地:不動地成就無分別自在與剎土自在,善慧地成就智自在,法雲地成就業自在。論中特別以「由諸通業無障礙故」說明法雲地的業自在;其核心表述不是泛稱任意造作一切業,而是著重「諸通業」的運用沒有障礙。這是《大乘莊嚴經論》界定此義時最具辨識度的術語形式。

三、在受生脈絡中,論列四種受生,即「業力生、願力生、定力生、通力生」。其中「業力生」被解釋為信行地菩薩「業力自在」,能夠「隨所欲處而受生」。因此,此處與業相關的自在明確落在受生處所的自主性:菩薩依其自在業力,隨所欲往之處受生。

四、其餘三種受生亦有助於辨明「業力自在」的邊界:願力生是入大地菩薩為成熟他者,能受畜生等生;定力生是得定菩薩能捨上界而於下界受生;通力生是得神通菩薩能於兜率天等示現諸相而受生。原文將四者並列,故「業力生」不可逕與願力、定力或通力受生混同。

五、就多譯名歸一而言,本論實際使用的相關名稱有「業自在」「業力自在」「業力生」及「諸通業無障礙」。其中「業自在」專見於四種自在及法雲地的說明,「業力自在」則見於信行地菩薩的業力受生。兩組語詞共同表現自在作用,卻分屬不同論述架構;小結時可歸於同一概念觀察,但不應抹去原文在階位、因由與受生類型上的區別。

Related