Dharma · AI Companion

二障

dvy-āvaraṇa

烦恼障与所知障AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

In the grand panorama of the Buddhadharma, the human predicament is never singular. We are bound not only by sudden eruptions of emotion and desire, but also obscured by the very way we cognize the world.

The *Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra* (《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》; Guṇabhadra's Liu Song translation) sets forth the most pivotal pair of concepts on the path of liberation—二障 (dvy-āvaraṇa, the two hindrances)—namely, 煩惱障 (kleśāvaraṇa, the hindrance of afflictions) and 智障 (jñeyāvaraṇa, the hindrance of knowledge), the latter also known as 法障 (dharmāvaraṇa, the hindrance of dharmas). To understand and thoroughly eradicate these two hindrances is the master key by which practitioners free themselves from the ocean of birth-and-death suffering and advance toward the ultimate perfection of the Buddha's cognition (佛之知覺) and the One Vehicle (一乘, *ekayāna*) teaching.


What This Concept Is Saying

To understand the two hindrances, one must first ask: At how many levels do the obstacles on our path of liberation actually operate?

The classical scriptures delineate with great precision the content, mechanism, and corresponding mental structure (consciousnesses) of each hindrance:

1. The First Hindrance: 煩惱障 (kleśāvaraṇa, the hindrance of afflictions) — broken through by "pudgala-nairātmya" (人無我, selflessness of persons)

* Definition and essence: The hindrance of afflictions refers to all the greed, hatred, delusion, pride, doubt, and other emotions and suffering that arise from clinging to an independent, substantially real "self" (人執, attachment to a person). It directly constitutes the shackles of saṃsāra. * Mechanism of eradication: To eradicate the hindrance of afflictions, one must train in "先習見人無我" — that is, deeply discern and realize that the so-called "self" is nothing more than a transient aggregation of the five aggregates (五陰, *pañcaskandha*), with no eternal sovereign within. * Corresponding operation of consciousness: The scripture states explicitly that eradicating the hindrance of afflictions is accompanied by "斷七識滅" — the cessation of the seven consciousnesses. Here, the "seven consciousnesses" specifically refer to "心、意、意識、眼識等七" (the mind, the manas, the mental consciousness, the eye-consciousness, etc. — i.e., the first six consciousnesses plus the coarse operation of the seventh, *manas*). When we cease to reduce the signals received through eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind to a "self" that experiences gain and loss, the chain reaction of the first seven consciousnesses raging and fabricating on behalf of the "self" is extinguished. * Scope of liberation: The śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas (聲聞、緣覺, i.e., arhats and pratyekabuddhas), together with all Buddhas and Tathāgatas, are completely equal in eradicating the hindrance of afflictions. The scripture calls this "解脫一味" ("one taste of liberation") — in the essential experience of escaping the suffering of birth-and-death saṃsāra, there is no difference whatsoever between a śrāvaka and a Buddha.

2. The Second Hindrance: 智障 / 法障 (jñeyāvaraṇa / dharmāvaraṇa, the hindrance of knowledge / of dharmas) — broken through by "dharma-nairātmya" (法無我, selflessness of dharmas)

* Definition and essence: The hindrance of knowledge, also called the hindrance of dharmas, does not mean that "intelligence has become an obstacle," but rather refers to an obstruction in cognizing the dharmadhātu (法界, the realm of dharmas, the true nature of things). Even if a person has eliminated selfish motives and emotions (having cut off the hindrance of afflictions), if he still regards all dharmas of the world — concepts, rules, phenomena, even the doctrinal formulations of the Dharma itself — as real, fixed entities (法執, attachment to dharmas), this subtle cognitive limitation will obscure ultimate wisdom (智, *jñāna*), preventing him from attaining the Tathāgata-like "omniscience" and "great compassion." * Mechanism of eradication: Eradicating the hindrance of knowledge depends on "見法無我" (seeing the selflessness of dharmas) — not only seeing through the absence of a self in "persons," but also seeing through the absence of self-nature in all "dharmas" (things, concepts, the law of causality, stages of practice), recognizing them as illusory and dreamlike, thereby attaining "supreme purity" (殊勝清淨). * Corresponding operation of consciousness: To achieve "liberation from the hindrance of dharmas," it is not enough to extinguish the coarse operations of the first seven consciousnesses; one must reach "識藏習滅" — the cessation of the habitual tendencies of the consciousness-store. Here, "consciousness-store" (識藏) is the *ālayavijñāna* (阿賴耶識), the seed-store that has accumulated the subtle habitual cognitions (習氣, *vāsanās*) from beginningless kalpas. Only when the momentary subtle habitual tendencies of the "mind, manas, mental consciousness, eye-consciousness, etc. (the seven)," having become remote [from defilements] and aligned with the wholesome, undefiled class (善無漏品), cease to revolve, are the seeds of ignorance in the consciousness-store thoroughly emptied. * Scope of liberation: The śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas have not eradicated the hindrance of knowledge; only the Buddhas and Tathāgatas can sever both hindrances simultaneously (雙斷二障). This is also the fundamental criterion distinguishing śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas from the ultimate "Buddha's cognition" (佛之知覺).

3. The Ultimate Root and Final Outcome

The scripture further states that the thorough eradication of the two hindrances and the eternal departure from "pariccheda-jāti-maraṇa" (分段生死, birth-and-death by division) and "vaikārika-jāti-maraṇa" (變易生死, birth-and-death by transformation) — that is, "離二種死" (departing from both kinds of death) — has its deepest root in severing the subtle habitual tendencies of the "四住地" (catvāri vāsa-bhūmīni, the four abiding places: the abode of views in one place, the abode of desire-love, the abode of form-love, and the abode of existence-love, corresponding to the root of the hindrance of afflictions) and the "無明住地" (avidyā-vāsa-bhūmi, the abode of ignorance, corresponding to the fundamental root of the hindrance of knowledge).

Only by thoroughly breaking through the two selflessnesses and completely severing the two hindrances can one truly realize the ultimate reality of the One Vehicle (一乘, *ekayāna*).


A Practical Walkthrough in Everyday Life

So that the two hindrances do not remain cold, abstract Buddhist terminology, let us conduct a deep "walkthrough" of the operation of consciousness using the most familiar scenario for contemporary people — working late at night while scrolling through one's phone.

Scenario: It is 11 p.m. You are working overtime when you suddenly receive a harshly worded email from a client rejecting your work, and at the same moment a social media notification pops up on your phone.

Stage One: The eruption and walkthrough of the hindrance of afflictions

1. Manifestation of consciousness: * The eye-consciousness (眼識) sees the red text in the email; * The mental consciousness (意識) instantly interprets it as "He is rejecting me; this is so unfair"; * The manas (意, the seventh consciousness) tightly grasps this "me," feeling wounded pride, anger, and anxiety; * The mind (心, the collecting-and-arising consciousness) immediately summons past memories of frustration, and the emotions erupt fully. 2. Caught in the hindrance of afflictions: You feel your heart racing, your whole being swallowed by the pain of "How dare they treat me like this." The essence of this pain is attachment to a person (人執) — you firmly believe there is a "self" being harmed. 3. Breaking through the hindrance of afflictions (seeing pudgala-nairātmya / cessation of the seven consciousnesses): * You pause and observe your body and mind: the bodily sensations of anger (racing heart, tightened stomach) are merely physiological reactions; the voice in your head is merely linguistic thought; the client's email is merely photoelectric signals and symbols. * There is no fixed "self" within any of this. * When you see "pudgala-nairātmya (selflessness of persons)," the violent chain reaction of emotions generated by the first seven consciousnesses on behalf of "self-protection" (the cessation of the seven consciousnesses) is immediately extinguished. You return to calm; the pain disappears. — You have tasted the coolness of "one taste of liberation" (解脫一味).

Stage Two: The hidden operation and walkthrough of the hindrance of knowledge (hindrance of dharmas)

You are no longer angry (having severed the hindrance of afflictions). But do you think you are fully awake? No — the hindrance of knowledge is operating at a deeper level:

1. Cognitive framing (attachment to dharmas): * Your mind begins to construct various fixed cognitive frameworks: "Consultants are always oppressed; clients are always arrogant"; "The workplace is a dog-eat-dog world"; you may even generate a sense of lofty superiority: "These ordinary people are still chasing fame and profit, while I already understand emotional management." 2. Caught in the hindrance of knowledge: * You treat "client/consultant," "workplace rules," "purity/defilement" — these concepts (dharmas) — as real, immutable theorems. Your consciousness-store (*ālayavijñāna*) holds countless subtle cognitive habitual tendencies about how the world "should operate." * This hindrance does not necessarily bring intense suffering, but it acts like an invisible filter, obscuring your ability to fully and truthfully perceive the present moment (hindering the "Buddha's cognition"). 3. Breaking through the hindrance of knowledge (seeing dharma-nairātmya / cessation of the habitual tendencies of the consciousness-store): * You observe further: the so-called "client," "consultant," "workplace," "success," "confusion and awakening" — all are merely concepts assigned by human language under conditioned causes and conditions; they have no fixed, unchanging essence of their own (dharma-nairātmya). * You also dismantle the self-satisfied framework of "I am practicing" and "I have already liberated myself from afflictions" (cessation of the habitual tendencies of the consciousness-store). * At this point, the subtle habitual tendencies of the abode of ignorance (無明住地) are swept away. You no longer view the world through any presupposed cognitive filter. You can see with complete impartiality, replete with measureless wisdom and empathy, the anxiety behind the client's words, the real crux of the project, and offer the most perfect solution.

Where people most often mis-map this: * Many people think that "cutting off afflictions" means suppressing emotions and forcing oneself not to be angry. But as long as the attachment to a person (人執) remains, suppression is merely water accumulating behind a reservoir that will eventually burst. True severance of afflictions is seeing "pudgala-nairātmya" — after which emotions lose their anchor and naturally subside. * Many people think that "cutting off the hindrance of knowledge" means not studying or reading. In fact, the hindrance of knowledge refers to treating knowledge and concepts as immovable, real entities, thereby losing the capacity for direct, intuitive perception of reality.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary society is an era of "double affliction," and the concept of the two hindrances precisely diagnoses the spiritual predicament of modern people:

1. The tyranny of emotion (the proliferation of the hindrance of afflictions): Algorithmic recommendations and social media vastly amplify the presence of the "self" — "my position," "my feelings," "my rights." Attachment to a person is strengthened as never before, leaving contemporary people extremely sensitive, fragile, and quick to anger, trapped in the "birth-and-death by division" style of spiritual torment that is anxiety and depression. The theory of the two hindrances tells you: the first step toward liberation from suffering is to step back from the fixation on "self" and realize "pudgala-nairātmya."

2. Cognitive cocoons and conceptual hardening (the predicament of the hindrance of knowledge): Contemporary people live in a highly symbol-laden, concept-saturated world. We apply all manner of labels (MBTI, class, political spectrum, performance metrics) to everything, and even AI and algorithmic models continually reinforce our cognitive frameworks through data preferences. This "conceptual hardening" is a textbook case of the hindrance of knowledge / hindrance of dharmas. People believe they have mastered vast amounts of information (knowledge), but are in fact thoroughly trapped by the frameworks behind that information, having lost the capacity for direct, keen, and expansive awareness of life.

A contemporary analogy: AI and the "consciousness-store" We can analogize the human "consciousness-store" (*ālayavijñāna*) to the underlying weight database of a contemporary large language model (LLM): * The model's training data (past habitual tendencies) determines what answers it outputs (the manifestation of the first seven consciousnesses). * If the underlying weights themselves contain bias (the abode of ignorance), no matter how fluent the surface-level dialogue (the first seven consciousnesses appearing calm), it still cannot deliver "truth" beyond its framework. * Limitations and unresolved issues: AI is merely unconscious symbolic matching based on probabilistic computation, whereas the "consciousness-store" in Buddhism possesses the quality of awareness (覺性) and the possibility of transformation from defilement to purity; AI cannot by itself realize "the two selflessnesses of persons and dharmas (人法二無我)" — breaking the framework can only be achieved by humans through the reverse dismantling of consciousness.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Does "智障 (zhìzhàng)" mean intellectual disability, stupidity, or low IQ?

Clarification: Absolutely not. In contemporary Chinese, "智障" is used as an abbreviation for intellectual disability, but in Buddhism, "智障" means "the hindrance that obstructs wisdom" (障智之障) — namely, the obstacle that prevents the arising of ultimate wisdom (Buddha-wisdom, 佛智) — also called "the hindrance of dharmas" (法障). Far from indicating low intelligence, it often occurs precisely in people who are extremely intelligent, highly learned, and rigorously logical, because such people are more prone to clinging to their own knowledge systems and conceptual frameworks (attachment to dharmas, 法執), and thus find it difficult to glimpse the supreme reality.

Misreading Two: If śrāvaka arhats have not severed the hindrance of knowledge, does that mean their liberation is fake?

Clarification: The scripture states explicitly that in the experience of "liberation," śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and all Buddhas and Tathāgatas share "解脫一味" ("one taste of liberation"). An arhat has already thoroughly severed the hindrance of afflictions and will never again fall into the suffering of the six realms of saṃsāra. When the scripture says they have "not [cut off] the hindrance of knowledge" (非智障, i.e., have not severed the hindrance of knowledge), it is not denying their liberation, but rather indicating that they have not yet attained the Tathāgata's ultimate station of "omniscience, perfection, and unobstructedness" (the Buddha's cognition, 佛之知覺).

Misreading Three: Can one sever the two hindrances simply by not thinking and emptying the mind?

Clarification: Emptying the mind at best temporarily suppresses the coarse delusions of the sixth consciousness, and may even lead to a state of neutral blankness (無記, drowsiness). This involves neither "seeing pudgala-nairātmya" nor "seeing dharma-nairātmya." Severing the two hindrances is an extremely profound contemplative wisdom and reshaping of consciousness (the cessation of the seven consciousnesses, the cessation of the habitual tendencies of the consciousness-store) — a union of "seeing" and "severing," by no means the wood-and-stone state of fleeing thought.


Conclusion

The theory of the two hindrances draws us an extraordinarily clear roadmap of mental liberation: Do not be satisfied with a temporary pacification of emotions (the coarse hindrance of afflictions), and do not indulge in the knowledge systems and moral high ground you have constructed (the hidden hindrance of knowledge).

Beginning with seeing through the illusoriness of the "self," and further breaking through attachment to "dharmas," extinguishing the deepest habitual tendencies of ignorance in the *ālayavijñāna* — this is not only the path by which the sages of antiquity walked toward ultimate perfection, but also the most penetrating guide for contemporary people to regain spiritual freedom and ultimate clarity in a complex and chaotic world.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》(刘宋求那跋陀罗译,《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》)中,「二障」是指「烦恼障」与「智障」(又称「法障」)。这两种障碍的了知与断除,是修行者从声闻、缘觉地迈向究竟佛果的核心路径,也是成就「佛之知觉」与开显「一乘」教法的根本依据。经中强调,唯有彻底断除二障,方能证得人法二无我,永离二种死,实现究竟的清净与解脱。

二、 主要阐述

《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》对二障的阐述,主要围绕其在不同修行阶位上的断除情况、具体的断除机制,以及与心识结构的深层关系展开。

首先,在修行阶位与断障程度的关系上,经文详细区分了声闻、缘觉与诸佛如来在面对二障时的异同。声闻、缘觉与诸佛如来在断除「烦恼障」这一点上是完全相同的。因为皆断除了烦恼障,声闻与缘觉在「解脱」的体验上与佛是「一味」的,在解脱的本质上并无差别。然而,声闻与缘觉的局限在于,他们并未断除「智障」。唯有诸佛如来能够双断二障,这也是区分声闻缘觉与佛之知觉的关键尺度。

其次,在二障的断除机制上,经文将二障与「二无我」的观照紧密结合。其中,「烦恼障」的断除,需要修行者「先习见人无我」。在心识运作的层面,断除烦恼障的过程伴随着「断七识灭」,即必须断除并熄灭前七识(经中具体指「心、意、意识、眼识等七」)的粗重运作。而「智障」(法障)的断除,则有赖于修行者「见法无我」,以此获得「殊胜清净」。

最后,经文指出,要达到最为究竟的清净,不仅要获得「法障解脱」(即断除智障),还必须达到「识藏习灭」。当「心、意、意识、眼识等七」的刹那习气,因远离、善无漏品远离时,心识便不再轮转,此时方能彻底断除二障与二烦恼,永离二种死。而这一切的根本,都在于断除「四住地」与「无明住地」的深重习气。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》(《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》)这一特定译本中,对于二障及相关心识、障碍的表述具有其独特的术语体系:

其一,关于「智障」的称呼。该译本在论述究竟清净与解脱时,将「智障」与「法障」进行了关联与互换。例如,在说明断除智障所获得的究竟果位时,经文使用了「法障解脱」一词,这表明在该译本的语境中,「智障」本质上即是对法界的障碍,故以「法障」表征其对「法无我」观照的遮蔽。

其二,关于心识与习气的术语。该译本使用了「识藏」这一独特术语来指代储藏习气的根本心识(即阿赖耶识),并提出「识藏习灭」是与「法障解脱」并列的究竟清净条件。

其三,关于前七识的表述。该译本并未含糊称之为七识,而是具体列举为「心、意、意识、眼识等七」,并以「断七识灭」来描述伴随烦恼障断除时的心识状态。

四、 与相关概念的关系

二障并非孤立的障碍,而是与经中多个核心佛学概念交织在一起:

1. 与「二无我」的关系:人无我与法无我是断除二障的观照基础。修行者通过「先习见人无我」来断除「烦恼障」;通过「见法无我」来断除「智障」(法障),从而获得殊胜清净。 2. 与「佛之知觉」及「一乘」的关系:觉悟「人无我」与「法无我」、了知「二障」、永离「二种死」以及断除「二烦恼」,共同构成了「佛之知觉」的核心内涵。声闻与缘觉若能得到此法,亦可名之为佛。如来正是基于此因缘,而为众生宣说「一乘」教法。 3. 与「七识」及「识藏」的关系:烦恼障的断除伴随着「心、意、意识、眼识等七」的熄灭(断七识灭);而智障的断除与究竟清净,则必须达到「识藏」中刹那习气的熄灭(识藏习灭),使其因远离、善无漏品远离而不再轮转。 4. 与「四住地」及「无明住地」的关系:二障、二烦恼的彻底断除以及永离二种死,其最根本的源头在于断除「四住地」与「无明住地」的习气。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 关于佛之知觉与二障的关系:「谓佛知觉者,人、法无我,了知二障,离二种死,断二烦恼,是名佛知觉。声闻、缘觉若得此法,亦名为佛,以是因缘,我说一乘。」 2. 偈颂对二障与佛知觉的重申:「善知二无我,二障烦恼断,永离二种死,是名佛知觉。」 3. 关于声闻与佛断障异同、心识及习气断除的详细论述:「声闻、缘觉断烦恼障,解脱一味,非智障。智障者,见法无我殊胜清净;烦恼障者,先习见人无我,断七识灭。法障解脱、识藏习灭,究竟清净。……心、意、意识、眼识等七,刹那习气,因远离、善无漏品远离,不复轮转。……二障、二烦恼断,离二种死,谓四住地、无明住地习气断。」

By SutraAI-generated

楞伽阿跋多羅寶經T0670 · 經集部

《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》論「二障」,並非以獨立名相加以展開釋義,而是將「二障」置於「佛之知覺」的定義結構之中,作為成佛覺悟所必須「了知」的對象之一。經中大慧菩薩問「何等是佛之知覺」,佛以四事對答:「覺人法無我,了知二障,離二種死,斷二煩惱,是名佛之知覺。」 此處「二障」與「二無我」「二種死」「二煩惱」並列,構成四組「二」的對偶框架,是此經表述佛覺內涵的獨特句式。值得注意的是,經文僅言「二障」,並未於此處點明二障之名目為「煩惱障」與「所知障」,亦未對二障各自的體性、差別加以分別解說;「了知二障」一語侧重於覺照、通達,而非僅止於斷除。

在術語形式上,此經有數處用詞可資記錄。其一,經中稱佛所證之覺為「佛之知覺」或「佛知覺」,而非他經常見之「菩提」「正等正覺」「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」等譯語。 其二,長行(散文)用「了知二障」,偈頌則作「二障煩惱斷」,將「二障」與「煩惱」合為一句而統攝於「斷」字之下,語序與長行有別:長行分說「了知二障」與「斷二煩惱」為二事,偈頌則合言「二障煩惱斷」,似將二障與煩惱視為同類而並舉其斷。 其三,長行言「離二種死」,偈頌言「永離二種死」,多一「永」字以強調究竟義。

就義理位置而言,此經將「了知二障」視為佛知覺的構成要素,而非僅是修行所斷之障礙。換言之,二障在此不僅是被對治的對象,更是覺悟內容的一部分——佛之知覺包含對二障的徹底了達。經文接著指出:「聲聞、緣覺得此法者,亦名為佛。以是因緣故,我說一乘。」 此謂若聲聞、緣覺亦能得此「覺人法無我、了知二障、離二種死、斷二煩惱」之法,則亦得名佛,由此建立一乘之說。二障之了知與斷除,在此成為貫通三乘歸於一乘的義理樞紐。

偈頌「善知二無我,二障煩惱斷,永離二種死,是名佛知覺」 為長行義之重宣,以「善知」對應長行之「覺」與「了知」,以「斷」字收攝二障與煩惱,句式更為緊湊。全段未見此經對二障內涵(何者為煩惱障、何者為所知障)的進一步界定,其論述止於將二障納入佛知覺的總綱之中。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》論二障,以「煩惱障」與「所知障」對舉,而於所知障著墨尤深,且隨文脈不同,立說各有側重。

一者,於「所知障淨智所行真實」中,論以「於所知能礙智故,名所知障」直接界定所知障——即於所知境能障礙智慧者;從所知障得解脫之智所行境界,即名「所知障淨智所行真實」。此境界謂諸菩薩、諸佛世尊入法無我、入已善淨,於一切法離言自性、假說自性平等平等無分別智所行;論更稱此為「最第一、真如無上、所知邊際」,謂「齊此一切正法思擇皆悉退還,不能越度」,以所知障之淨治為正法思擇之究極邊際。

二者,於戒律與修行次第脈絡中,論列「障生次第」五障:慢緩障、有罪障、輕慢障、惡作障、所知障。此處所知障非以「礙智」之定義出之,而由定慧缺失說之:由不歡喜、不生適悅,乃至心不得定,「心不定故,無如實知、無如實觀。由此因緣,名所知障」;五障輾轉相觸,終至「變悔轉增」,復由心不得定而為所知障所觸。與此相違即「五種無障」:無慢緩障、無有罪障、無輕慢障、無惡作障、無所知障。是知本論於此處以「無如實知、無如實觀」為所知障之相,並置於戒、定輾轉生起之序列。

三者,於勝義諦相與諸行相同異之辨中,論主舉「二障」為總稱:非見諦者於諸行相不能除遣、於相縛不能解脫、於麁重縛不能解脫,「以於二障能解脫故」,見諦者則能除遣、解脫,由是或得無上方便安隱涅槃,或有能證阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。此處雖未分釋煩惱障、所知障各自之相,然以二障對舉、總攝諸縛,並繫於涅槃與菩提之證得,用以論成勝義諦相與諸行相「都無異」與「一向異」俱不應理。

綜觀三處,本論用語作「煩惱障」「所知障」,合稱「二障」;所知障之界定凡二途:一就智慧言,謂「於所知能礙智」;一就定慧生起言,謂心不定故「無如實知、無如實觀」。其淨治所顯,則為離言自性、假說自性平等平等無分別智所行之所知邊際。

成唯識論T1585 · 瑜伽部

《成唯識論》對二障有嚴密的體系性論述,涵蓋定義、體性關係、種姓建立、斷位次第與轉依歸趣。

一、定義與體性。論中明確定義:煩惱障者,謂執遍計所執實我,薩迦耶見而為上首,百二十八根本煩惱及彼等流諸隨煩惱,擾惱有情身心,能障涅槃;所知障者,謂執遍計所執實法,薩迦耶見而為上首,見、疑、無明、愛、恚、慢等,覆所知境無顛倒性,能障菩提。論中特別指出「煩惱障中此障(所知障)必有,彼定用此為所依故,體雖無異而用有別」,即二障體同一而功用分殊,所知障為煩惱障之所依。所知障決定不與異熟識俱,以彼微劣、不與無明慧相應、法空智品與俱起故;於無覆無記性中是異熟生,望二乘名無覆,望菩薩則亦是有覆。

二、術語形式。論中以「二取習氣」稱二障種子,謂「二取習氣即前所說二障種子,俱執著故」;又以「二隨眠」稱之,謂隨逐有情、眠伏藏識。此「隨眠」「習氣」之稱即本論用語特色。

三、依障立種姓。論云:若全無無漏種者,彼二障種永不可害,立為非涅槃法;若唯有二乘無漏種者,所知障種永不可害,一分立為聲聞種姓、一分立為獨覺種姓;若亦有佛無漏種者,二障種俱可永害,立為如來種姓。故由無漏種子有無,障有可斷、不可斷義。

四、斷位次第。分別起者見所斷攝,任運起者修所斷攝;二乘但能斷煩惱障,菩薩俱斷;永斷二種唯聖道能,伏二現行通有漏道。真見道中無分別智實證二空所顯真理、實斷二障分別隨眠。十地修道位中「唯修永滅所知障道,留煩惱障助願受生,非如二乘速趣圓寂」,將成佛時方頓斷煩惱障種。總攝而言:煩惱障見所斷種於極喜地見道初斷,修所斷種金剛喻定時一切頓斷;所知障見所斷種亦極喜地初斷,修所斷種於十地中漸次斷滅,金剛喻定時方永斷盡。第七識俱煩惱障種三乘將得無學果時一剎那三界頓斷,所知障種將成佛時一剎那一切頓斷。

五、十地十障。論中十地所斷十重障(異生性障、邪行障、闇鈍障、微細煩惱現行障、於下乘般涅槃障、麁相現行障、細相現行障等)皆歸入「所知障中俱生一分」,雖初地所斷實通二障,而意取所知,以十無明非染污故,二乘亦能斷煩惱障,非此所說。此十一障為二障所攝。

六、轉依歸趣。轉依位中,通達轉斷分別生二障麁重,修習轉漸斷俱生二障麁重。所轉捨中「所斷捨」即二障種,真無間道現在前時障治相違、彼便斷滅、永不成就。波羅蜜多七最勝中「清淨最勝」謂不為二障間雜。

Related