Dharma · AI Companion

二十二根

dvāviṃśatīndriyāṇi

阿毗达磨所立二十二种根。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

根法数立于阿毗达磨实有层,般若以蕴处界皆空正面重读为顶(比照本份[39]六门根尘判例)

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In everyday Chinese, the character 根 (gēn) is too easily read as "organ" or "source." But in the Abhidharma context (阿毘達磨), it corresponds to the Sanskrit *indriya*, whose root comes from Indra (帝釋天, Śakra, lord of the gods), and whose core meaning is predominance (增上, ādhipatya) — a controlling, decisive power over something. The *Abhidharmakośa* (《俱舍論》T1558) draws the boundary in one sentence: hands, feet, larynx, teeth, eyelids, and so on, "though they have function, are not faculties because they are not predominant" (雖有用非增上故). Hands can grasp, teeth can chew, but they are only participants, not the master of the matter. A faculty is that which, if absent, makes the entire matter impossible.

The twenty-two faculties (二十二根) are the complete enumeration of every dharma in sentient life that exercises this predominating function, twenty-two in all. This is not an arbitrary list but a division of the entire structure of life into two parts by means of two gates:

The first fourteen faculties — the support of flowing-on (the gate of flowing-on, 流轉門)

These fourteen answer one question: on what basis does an ordinary person keep revolving through birth and death?

- The six faculties of eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind (眼耳鼻舌身意六根): the support of flowing-on. The first five are sensory channels; the mind faculty is the central pivot of cognition. Note: the treatise deliberately extracts the mind faculty from the six sense-bases arrangement of the sūtras and places it after the life faculty, on the ground that "it has an object" (有所緣故) — the mind faculty has a determinate cognitive object, differing in nature from the first five faculties as mere sensory channels, so the commentators rearranged the order. - The female and male faculties (女根、男根): the cause of birth. That sentient beings continue to take birth and that new life keeps appearing are due to the reproductive mechanism brought by sexual differentiation. This is not a value judgment but a sober description of the mechanism by which life continues. - The life faculty (命根, *jīvitendriya*): the cause of endurance. That a single life-span continues uninterruptedly from conception to death is maintained by the life faculty. It is the predominating condition of "this life-span is still ongoing." - The five feeling faculties of pleasure, pain, joy, sorrow, and equanimity (樂苦喜憂捨五受根): the cause of experiencing. Being alive is not merely "existing"; there is also "feeling." These five determine how a sentient being apprehends its objects — pleasant or unpleasant, bodily or mental.

Looking at these fourteen together: there is sensory access (six faculties), reproductive continuation (female and male), life-span continuity (life faculty), and the apprehension of pleasure and pain (five feelings) — this is a complete structure of "revolving within birth and death." Not one more, not one less.

The last eight faculties — the support of cessation-and-return (the gate of cessation, 還滅門)

These eight answer another question: on what basis can a sentient being step out of birth and death?

- The five faculties of faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom (信勤念定慧五根): the support of cessation-and-return. These five are the "five faculties" of the thirty-seven aids to enlightenment (三十七道品, *bodhipākṣika-dharma*), and also the five powers. Faith is the confirmation of the Three Jewels (三寶) and of cause and effect (not blind belief, but "belief after confirmation"); energy is the four right efforts (四正勤) — already-arisen evil is cut off, not-yet-arisen evil does not arise, not-yet-arisen good arises, already-arisen good grows; mindfulness is the sustained awareness of the four establishments of mindfulness (四念處); concentration is one-pointedness of mind (心一境性); wisdom is seeing things as they are (如實知見). These five are the infrastructure of practice. - The faculty of "to-be-known," the faculty of "known," and the faculty of "final knowledge" — the three untainted faculties (三無漏根): These three are not new things independent of the previous five, but the different states of the five faculties — mind, joy, equanimity, pleasure, faith — across the three paths. The treatise says: "The five faculties of mind, joy, equanimity, pleasure, faith are established respectively in the three paths" (意樂喜捨信等五根,在於三道,如次建立). At the path of seeing (見道, *darśana-mārga*), these faculties are called "to-be-known" (未知當知) — a truth not previously known is now about to be known; at the path of cultivation (修道, *bhāvanā-mārga*), they are called "known" (已知) — already seen, now being repeatedly practiced and consolidated; at the path of no-more-learning (無學道, *aśaikṣa-mārga*), they are called "final knowledge" (具知) — attaining the knowledge of exhaustion (盡智, *kṣaya-jñāna*) and the knowledge of non-arising (無生智, *anutpāda-jñāna*), utterly complete.

So the structure of the last eight is: the five faculties are the material, and the three untainted faculties are the upgraded states of that same material at the three stages of the path of seeing, the path of cultivation, and the path of no-more-learning. Just as the same piece of iron has different names at the stages of forging, quenching, and final shaping.

The internal structure of the five feeling faculties deserves separate treatment

These five are not five arbitrarily listed emotions. The treatise gives a precise criterion of division:

| Feeling faculty | Corresponding consciousness | Nature | |------|--------|------| | Pain faculty (苦根) | The first five consciousnesses | Bodily feeling; affliction | | Pleasure faculty (樂根) | The first five consciousnesses (and the consciousness of the third dhyāna) | Bodily feeling; beneficial (the mental joy of the third dhyāna is also called pleasure) | | Joy faculty (喜根) | Mind consciousness (the lower three grounds) | Mental feeling; delight | | Sorrow faculty (憂根) | Mind consciousness | Mental feeling; affliction | | Equanimity faculty (捨根) | Pervades body and mind | Neither pleased nor displeased |

Key detail: the pleasure faculty is special — bodily comfort is the pleasure faculty, but at the third dhyāna, that extremely deep inner ease is also called the pleasure faculty (because the intensity of third-dhyāna joy is already "pervading the body" like bodily feeling). The joy faculty is the mental delight and elation of the first and second dhyānas. The equanimity faculty is the most distinctive: the treatise explicitly raises the question "Is it bodily feeling or mental feeling?" (為是身受為是心受?). The answer: "It should be said to pertain to both" (應言通二), because equanimous feeling is "without distinction" (同無分別故) on both the bodily and mental levels — it is uniformly neutral, unlike pleasure and pain, which "differ in appearance" (其相各異) on the bodily and mental sides, so a single faculty suffices.

Realm-belonging distribution: the higher the realm, the fewer the faculties

This distribution itself is instructive:

- The desire realm (欲界, *kāmadhātu*): nineteen faculties (excluding the three untainted) — the most "full" state, with everything. - The form realm (色界, *rūpadhātu*): fifteen faculties (additionally removing female, male, sorrow, and pain) — no sexual differentiation, no bodily pain, no mental sorrow. - The formless realm (無色界, *ārūpyadhātu*): eight faculties (mind, life, equanimity, and the five of faith etc.) — not even a material body remains, only mental activity.

From nineteen to fifteen to eight is a process of continuous "subtraction." And the three untainted faculties are not within the three realms — they are supramundane.


A Walk-Through in Daily Life

Let us walk through a day of life.

You wake up in the morning. The alarm rings.

The ear hears the sound — this is the ear faculty (耳根, *śrotrendriya*) exercising its predominating function. Note: it is not "the organ of the ear" but the auditory capacity itself. A person whose ears are intact but who is deeply anesthetized has the ear faculty temporarily non-operative. The ear faculty is the master condition of "being able to hear."

You feel a pang of discomfort — a dull resistance as the body is pulled out of sleep. This is the pain faculty (苦根, *duḥkhendriya*), bodily feeling, the affliction corresponding to the body consciousness. Note: this is not "being in a bad mood." That would be the sorrow faculty (憂根, *daurmanasyendriya*), at the level of consciousness. At this moment you may not yet have begun to "think" anything; it is purely bodily discomfort. Many people scroll their phones upon waking and see an anxiety-inducing message — that is the sorrow faculty, affliction at the mental level. Conflating bodily discomfort with mental anxiety is the first common mapping error.

You stretch and think, "Ah, okay, today feels fine" — flat and even, neither especially comfortable nor especially uncomfortable. This is the equanimity faculty (捨根, *upekṣendriya*). The equanimity faculty is too easily overlooked, yet it actually occupies a large portion of the day. Waiting for the bus, walking, doing mechanical chores — most feelings in these moments are equanimous feeling. It is "neither pleased nor displeased" (非悅非不悅), pervading both body and mind.

On the commute, you scroll your phone.

The eyes fix on the screen — the eye faculty (眼根, *cakṣurindriya*). You see a short video, the content is hilarious, and a surge of delight rises in your mind — this is the joy faculty (喜根, *saumanasyendriya*), mental delight at the level of consciousness. Note: not the pleasure faculty. The pleasure faculty is bodily comfort (like a hot bath, a massage), while the joy of scrolling is almost entirely mental — it is the joy faculty. Much of contemporary "happiness" is actually the joy faculty rather than the pleasure faculty — you have not actually made the body comfortable; you have merely made the mind glad for a moment. Why does this distinction matter? Because the satisfaction of the joy faculty is extremely short-lived; it depends on novel stimulation, and once the stimulus disappears, it falls back. The restorative effect of the pleasure faculty (deep relaxation, sufficient sleep) is real and lasting. Using the joy faculty as if it were the pleasure faculty is the structural reason for "the more you scroll, the emptier you feel."

You keep scrolling and see news that makes you angry — the sorrow faculty is operative. The treatise says of the sorrow faculty that "because it arises with strong volitional activity, it is not indeterminate" (強思起故非無記) — it necessarily arises with intense volitional activity (the mental factor of intention, 思心所, *cetanā*), never unconsciously. In other words, your anger does not "happen automatically"; there is the participation of your attention actively grasping and actively chewing on it. This observation is not for self-condemnation but for seeing: the arising of the sorrow faculty has links where intervention is possible.

You arrive at the office and start working overtime.

You sit down to handle a complex email. Here the mind faculty (意根, *manendriya*) is in full command — understanding semantics, organizing logic, judging wording. The mind faculty is "object-possessing"; it always has a determinate cognitive object. Unlike the eye faculty, which merely "sees," the mind faculty "understands, judges, infers."

You notice your mind has wandered and pull it back — in this act of "pulling back," the mindfulness faculty (念根, *smṛtīndriya*) is at work. Mindfulness is "not losing the object," the anchoring of sustained awareness. Wandering is not the mindfulness faculty's problem; failing to pull back is.

You force yourself to finish the email and feel a sense of "finally done" satisfaction — this is still the joy faculty (mental delight), not the pleasure faculty.

In the evening, you argue with your partner.

The other person says something and you feel negated. The sorrow faculty arises violently. Notice what happens here: the ear faculty hears the sound (merely sound waves), the mind faculty understands the semantics (merely information), and then the sorrow faculty arises (mental affliction). In between there is an extremely short gap — between "understanding" and "being hurt." The framework of the twenty-two faculties lets you see: the ear faculty, the mind faculty, and the sorrow faculty are three distinct dharmas; they are not a monolithic block. Hearing is not being hurt. Understanding is not agreeing. This gap is where practice can enter.

Late at night, you decide to seriously look into the Buddhadharma.

You open a book, read about the four noble truths, and a sense of confirmation arises in your mind: "Yes, suffering really is structured like this." This is the faith faculty (信根, *śraddhendriya*) sprouting. Faith is not "I choose to believe"; it is "I have seen clearly, so I confirm." The treatise cites a canonical sūtra: "If one entirely lacks these five faculties of faith and so on, I say that one dwells in the class of external ordinary beings" (若全無此信等五根我說彼住外異生品) — if a person completely lacks the five faculties of faith and so on, the Buddha says such a person dwells in the "class of external ordinary beings" (外異生品, the ordinary among the ordinary). This is not a threat; it is a description: without confirmation, without energy, without awareness, without concentration, without wisdom, life merely revolves within the fourteen faculties, with no direction of cessation-and-return.

You start sitting in meditation ten minutes a day. You cannot sit still, but you keep sitting — the energy faculty (勤根, *vīryendriya*). You can remember to return to the breath — the mindfulness faculty. Occasionally a few minutes where the mind genuinely settles — the concentration faculty (定根, *samādhīndriya*). In the stillness you suddenly see clearly: "So I have been having a conversation with my own thoughts all along" — the wisdom faculty (慧根, *prajñendriya*).

These five are the step from the gate of flowing-on into the gate of cessation-and-return.

And if you truly walk this path onward, at the moment of seeing the path, the state of these five faculties is called the faculty of "to-be-known" (未知當知根, *anājñātam-ājñāsyamānendriya*) — the truth of suffering, origin, cessation, and path that you previously knew only conceptually, you now see personally. Continuing to practice, it is called the faculty of "known" (已知根, *ājñendriya*). Practicing to the end, it is called the faculty of "final knowledge" (具知根, *ājñātāvīndriya*) — the knowledge of exhaustion and the knowledge of non-arising: "what should be known is all known; what should no longer arise no longer arises."


Why Contemporary People Need It

First, it provides a precise map of "what exactly am I made of."

Contemporary people are used to summarizing themselves with the two characters 身心 (body-and-mind). But "body-and-mind" is too coarse. The twenty-two faculties tell you: the single item of "feeling" alone must be divided into five kinds — bodily pain and mental sorrow are two different things, bodily pleasure and mental joy are two different things, and equanimous feeling spans both body and mind. The single item of "cognitive capacity" alone: the first five faculties and the mind faculty differ in nature — the first five are channels, the mind faculty is the pivot. This precision is not for the sake of scholarship but for prescribing the right remedy: at this moment, is it the pain faculty ringing (the body genuinely needs rest) or the sorrow faculty ringing (the mind needs to be seen)? The solutions are entirely different. When the body is tired, sleep; when the mind is tired, scroll the phone — this is treating the sorrow faculty as if it were the pain faculty, and the more you treat it, the worse it gets.

Second, it pulls "practice" back from metaphysics into engineering.

The eight faculties of the gate of cessation-and-return have an extremely clear structure: the five faculties are infrastructure, the three untainted faculties are three milestones. Faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, wisdom — each has a clear definition and an operational content (faith is confirmation, energy is the four right efforts, mindfulness is the four establishments of mindfulness, concentration is one-pointedness of mind, wisdom is seeing things as they are). You do not need "enlightenment" to begin; you only need to start from the faith faculty: confirm that the structure of suffering is real, confirm that the cessation of suffering is possible. Then the energy faculty follows: what should be cut off is cut off, what should be cultivated is cultivated. This is a system with steps, with feedback, with a terminus.

Third, it explains why "knowing many principles yet failing to live this life well."

The fourteen faculties of the gate of flowing-on operate automatically — you do not need to learn in order to see, hear, suffer, enjoy, or cling to life and fear death. But the eight faculties of the gate of cessation-and-return are not automatic. Faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom require deliberate cultivation; the three untainted faculties require seeing the path to be activated. If a person has only the fourteen faculties of flowing-on running at full capacity and the eight of cessation-and-return at nearly zero, then their life is a car with only an accelerator and no steering wheel — full of power, but going nowhere. The characteristic of the contemporary information environment is precisely this: it extremely stimulates your six faculties (especially the eye and mind faculties) and the five feeling faculties (especially joy and sorrow), while entirely failing to nourish faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom. The algorithm does not care about your gate of cessation-and-return; it only feeds your gate of flowing-on.

Fourth, the criterion "though they have function, they are not predominant" is itself a training in thinking.

Why are hands and feet not faculties? Because they are "useful" but not "predominant." This distinction is extremely valuable in the contemporary world: we encounter a vast amount of "useful" information, tools, and advice every day, but things that genuinely have predominating function — without which the whole matter collapses — are extremely few. Learning to distinguish "participation" from "mastery," "useful" from "indispensable," is itself an extremely profound training in wisdom.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading one: "Faculty" means sense organ.

This is the most common misreading. The eye faculty is not the eyeball; the ear faculty is not the ear. A faculty is "predominance" — the dominant condition by which that function is established. A person whose eyeballs are intact but who is brain-dead no longer has the eye faculty operative. Conversely, the treatise discusses that beings in the form realm have the eye faculty, but their "eye" is structurally entirely different from our fleshy eye. A faculty is functional, not anatomical.

Misreading two: The five feeling faculties are five emotions.

No. The five feeling faculties are feeling (受, *vedanā*), not perception (想, *saṃjñā*) or volitional formations (行, *saṃskāra*). Feeling is "reception" (領納) — pure pleasant/unpleasant/neutral experience. Emotions (anger, jealousy, attachment, and so on) belong to the volitional aggregate (行蘊); they are more complex mental constructs. The sorrow faculty is not a specific emotion like "sadness" but the general name for all "unpleasant reception" at the level of consciousness. Conflating feeling with emotions leads to aiming at the wrong object in practice: you think you are observing "feeling," but you are actually observing perception and volitional formations.

Misreading three: The female and male faculties are "gender discrimination."

No. The treatise positions the female and male faculties as "the cause of birth" — the reproductive condition for the continuous succession of sentient beings. This is a description of biological fact, not a value judgment. Moreover, the treatise explicitly states that in the form realm, the female and male faculties do not exist (the form realm has fifteen faculties, removing female, male, sorrow, and pain). On the path to liberation, sexual differentiation is a characteristic of the desire realm, not ultimate reality.

Misreading four: The faith faculty is "religious belief," blind acceptance.

The treatise cites the canonical sūtra "If one entirely lacks these five faculties of faith and so on, I say that one dwells in the class of external ordinary beings." Here faith (信, *śraddhā*) is the confirmation (*adhimukti*) of the Three Jewels, cause and effect, and the four truths — not unexamined acceptance. In the Abhidharma system, faith is a wholesome mental factor (善心所); its characteristic is "causing the mind to become clear and still" (令心澄淨) — like alum clarifying muddy water. Blind belief makes the mind muddier; it is not the faith faculty.

Misreading five: The three untainted faculties are three "new faculties" alongside the five of faith and so on.

No. The treatise states it clearly: "The five faculties of mind, joy, equanimity, pleasure, faith are established respectively in the three paths." The three untainted faculties are simply the state-names of the five faculties of faith and so on (plus the mind faculty and the feeling faculty) at the three stages of the path of seeing, the path of cultivation, and the path of no-more-learning. They are not "three extra parts" among the twenty-two faculties but three modes of operation of the same set of parts. This is like water being called ice below zero degrees, water above zero, and steam above one hundred — not three different substances, but three phase-states of the same substance under different conditions.

Misreading six: The twenty-two faculties are a "closed list" unrelated to other dharma-number systems.

Quite the opposite. The twenty-two faculties have a clear relation of inclusion with the eighteen elements (十八界): the inner twelve elements and one portion of the dharmadhātu include these twenty-two faculties. The five feeling faculties are the five feelings; the five faculties of faith and so on are the five faculties/five powers of the thirty-seven aids to enlightenment; the three untainted faculties correspond to the three paths. It is a cross-referencing system that threads together contents scattered across different dharma-number classifications by the single clue of "predominance." Enter from any doorway — the five aggregates (五蘊), the twelve sense-bases (十二處), the eighteen elements, the thirty-seven aids to enlightenment — and you can ultimately connect with the twenty-two faculties.

A final clarification, on the equanimity faculty.

The equanimity faculty is too easily understood as "numbness" or "indifference." No. The treatise says it is "neither pleased nor displeased" — it has not suppressed pleasure and displeasure but genuinely abides in a neutral receptive state. In practice, equanimity is an extremely high quality (the equanimity immeasurable of the four immeasurables (四無量心), the equanimity awakening factor of the seven factors of awakening (七覺支)), meaning the mind is not dragged about by pleasure and displeasure. But at the level of the ordinary person, most equanimous feeling is merely "not having noticed" — not true impartial equanimity but insensibility in dullness or distraction. These two kinds of "equanimity" look alike on the surface but differ vastly in substance. The framework of the twenty-two faculties helps you distinguish: is your "feeling nothing" the equanimity faculty functioning normally, or is it numbness caused by the absence of the mindfulness faculty?


The twenty-two faculties, in the final analysis, are the most complete engineering blueprint the Abhidharma commentators gave for "how a sentient being actually operates." The fourteen faculties of the gate of flowing-on tell you: this is how you are locked into birth and death — sense, sex, life-span, feeling, four layers of predominating conditions pin you firmly in place. The eight faculties of the gate of cessation-and-return tell you: the key is also in your hands — faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, wisdom, and their perfection at three milestones. The core criterion of the entire blueprint is a single word: predominance (增上). Not "is it useful" but "is it master." This criterion is used both to establish the twenty-two faculties and to examine everything in our contemporary lives: what things truly master your life? What are merely "though useful, not predominant" noise?

Seeing this blueprint clearly is not for the purpose of becoming an Abhidharma scholar. It is for knowing: flowing-on is not fate, cessation-and-return is not myth. The gate is right there, with the fourteen faculties on this side and the eight on that side. Which side you stand on at this moment depends on whether the faith faculty has begun to sprout.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

二十二根(dvāviṃśatīndriya)指眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意、女、男、命、乐、苦、喜、忧、舍、信、勤、念、定、慧、未知当知、已知、具知等二十二种具有增上作用的法。论中以前十四根为流转所依(流转门),后八根为还灭所依(还灭门)。

二、主要阐述

(一)列名与次第

《阿毘达磨俱舍论》(《阿毘達磨俱舍論》)明列二十二根之名,并指出阿毘达磨诸大论师越经中六处次第,于命根后方说意根,以意根有所缘故,不同于经中以眼耳鼻舌身意六处为次第之排列。

(二)二门建立

论以二门建立二十二根:

- 流转门:眼等六根为流转所依;女男二根为生因;命根为住因;乐、苦、喜、忧、舍五受根为受用因。此十四根建立流转。 - 还灭门:信、勤、念、定、慧五根为还灭所依;三无漏根(未知当知、已知、具知)由初故生、由次故住、由后受用。此八根建立还灭。

并据此破斥增立手足、出大便处、出小便处、喉齿眼睑等为根,谓彼「虽有用非增上故」。

(三)五受根与三无漏根之体性

五受根:身受(与五识相应受)中损恼为苦根,摄益为乐根;第三静虑心相应之摄益受亦名乐根;下三地心悦名喜根;意识相应损恼名忧根;非悦非不悦即舍根。舍根「为是身受为是心受?应言通二」,因其在身心「同无分别故」总立一根,与苦乐在身心「其相各异」故别立者相对。

三无漏根:「意乐喜舍信等五根,在于三道,如次建立」未知当知、已知、具知三根:见道名未知当知(未曾知当知行转),修道名已知,无学道名具知(得尽智、无生智)。

(四)多门分别

(一)有漏无漏:后三无漏根「体唯无漏」;七有色根(眼等五根及女男根)及命、忧、苦「一向有漏」;意、乐、喜、舍、信等五根「通有漏无漏」。并引「若全无此信等五根我说彼住外异生品」之契经,以驳有余师主张信等五根唯无漏之说。

(二)异熟:忧根「定有异熟」(强思起故非无记,唯散地故非无漏);眼等八根及最后三根定无异熟;意、乐、喜、舍、信等五根及苦根通二;眼等八善趣为善异熟、恶趣为恶异熟。

(三)三性:信等八根一向善,忧通善不善,意及余受(乐喜舍)通三,眼等八根唯无记。

(四)界系:欲界系十九根(除后三无漏),色界系十五根(更除男女忧苦),无色界系八根(意、命、舍、信等五,更除五色及喜乐)。

(五)成就:命、意、舍三根若成就一必具三;余根则随位不定成就;具知、已知、未知当知三根成就依次为十一、十一、十三;诸二形者具十九(除三无漏),圣者未离欲亦具十九。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

本条目仅依《阿毘达磨俱舍论》(《阿毘達磨俱舍論》)为据。该论本身已显示阿毘达磨论师之说法与经中六处次第之不同:经中以眼耳鼻舌身意六处为次第,论中则越此次第,于命根后方说意根,以意根「有所缘故」。

四、与相关概念的关系

与十八界之摄属:十八界中内十二界及法界一分摄此二十二根。内十二界中,眼等五根即自名,意根通七心界,后三无漏根为意、意识摄,女男根为身界一分;命等十一根及三无漏根之一分法界摄。色等五界及法界一分「体非根」。

与五受之关系:二十二根中之乐、苦、喜、忧、舍五受根即五受,分属身受(五识相应)与心受(意识相应)。

与三无漏道之关系:三无漏根(未知当知、已知、具知)对应见道、修道、无学道,并以意、乐、喜、舍、信等五根于三道中依次建立。

五、代表性原文引用

- 「阿毘达磨诸大论师皆越经中六处次第,于命根后方说意根,有所缘故。」 - 破斥增立手足等为根:「虽有用非增上故」。 - 论舍根:「为是身受为是心受?应言通二」,「同无分别故」总立一根。 - 论三无漏根:「意乐喜舍信等五根,在于三道,如次建立」未知当知、已知、具知三根。 - 引契经:「若全无此信等五根我说彼住外异生品」(以驳信等五根唯无漏之说)。 - 论忧根异熟:「强思起故非无记,唯散地故非无漏」。

By SutraAI-generated

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》對二十二根的論述,層次分明,先列舉其名與攝屬,再依多門辨析體性差別。

正文首列二十二根:眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意、女、男、命、樂、苦、喜、憂、捨、信、勤、念、定、慧、未知當知、已知、具知。值得注意的是,阿毘達磨諸大論師越經中六處次第,於命根後方說意根,以意根有所緣故,此為本論獨特之編排。攝屬上,二十二根攝於內十二界及法界一分:眼等五根即眼等五界,意根通七心界攝,女男根即身界一分,命等十一根及後三一分屬法界攝。

義類上,二十二根分為流轉與還滅兩組。流轉所依十四根:前六根為生所依,女男根為生由所依,命根為住所依,五受為受用所依。還滅所依八根:信等五根為三無漏根之生、住、受用因,三無漏根即所成果。論中並辨手、足、語具、出大小便處、喉齒眼瞼支節等不立為根之理,以顯此二十二根皆具增上義而立。

五受之體辨析詳盡:身受依身起,苦為損惱,樂為攝益;心受中,心悅於第三定名樂根,於下三地為喜根;憂為意識相應之損惱受;捨為處中之不苦不樂受,通於身、心。論以捨根於身心同無分別、非損非益、相無別故總立一根;苦樂於身、心相異故別立。

三無漏根依三道而立:見道依意等九立未知當知根,修道依此九立已知根,無學道依此九立具知根。得名之因:見道有未曾知當知行轉;修道雖知而為斷餘隨眠復數了知;無學道知已已知,得盡智、無生智故名具知。

多門分別中,以有漏無漏辨:最後三根體唯無漏,七有色根(眼等五根及女男根)及命、憂、苦一向有漏,意、樂、喜、捨、信等五根通二。論主引有餘師說信等五根唯無漏,依經證反駁,斷信等五根通有漏無漏。

異熟門中,憂非異熟,以思擇、止息所生故;眼等八根隨善惡趣為善惡異熟,意根隨趣通二,喜樂捨為善異熟,苦根為惡異熟。論以憂根雖非異熟,然定有異熟,蓋憂非無記(強思起故)、唯散地故(非無漏),具此二義故越次先說。

善惡門:信等八根(信等五根及三無漏根)一向善,憂根通善不善,意及餘受通善、不善、無記,眼等八根唯無記。

界繫門:欲界繫十九根(除後三無漏),色界繫十五根(更除男女、憂苦),無色界繫八根(又除五色、喜、樂,餘意、命、捨、信等五)。

末論二形者具十九根(除三無漏),聖者未離欲亦具十九,並辨女男二根隨除一種,以聖者無二形故。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》以「增上義」釋「根義」,並以此為基準從多個側面施設建立二十二根。

一、根之定義與施設總說

論中以問答明:「何等是根義?答:增上義是根義。為顯於彼彼事彼彼法最勝義」,即以增上、勝用之義界定根之內涵。又以六種增上義統括二十二根之建立:「略由六處增上義故,當知建立二十二根」,六者為:一能取境界、二繼嗣家族、三活命因緣各別事業加行士用、四受用先業所作愛不愛果及造新業、五趣向世間離欲、六趣向出世離欲。六處之配屬為:眼等六根取境、男女二根繼嗣、命根活命、五受根受用業果、信等五根趣向世間離欲、未知當知等三無漏根趣向出世離欲。論末總結:「一切世間所現見義,其唯此量。當知是義能究竟者,無出於此二十二根,故一切根二十二攝」。

二、二十二根之具體分類

依增上義之不同,論施設六種分類方式:

(1)以世俗勝用立:六根取境、二根相續、一根活命、五根受用業果、五根世間清淨、三根出世清淨。

(2)以顯隱境界立:六根顯境、二根隱境、一根時分邊際、五根雜染、八根安立清淨。

(3)以內外受用立:六根內門、二根外門、一根內身、五根雜染、八根對治清淨。

(4)以依止作用立:五根端嚴、一根隨自在轉、一根安住、二根出生、五根損益、八根解脫。

(5)以有情事相立:六根顯有情事、二根生有情事、一根令住沒、五根受用境界、五根勝生方便、三根定勝方便。

(6)以顯了損益立:六根顯有情事、二根顯增長、一根顯壽損、五根顯興衰、八根顯功德過失。

三、在家與出家之施設差別

論又就所依之機施設差別:「依如是名,建立六根。依如是種、如是姓,建立二根。依如是食、如是受苦樂,建立五根。依如是長壽、如是久住、如是壽量邊際,建立一根。當知此諸根,依在家品施設建立」;「依如是信、如是精進,乃至如是慧、如是向、如是果,建立八根。當知此諸根,依出家品施設建立」。

四、修行加行之施設

復就修行者行相施設:六根防護根門、二根堪證沙門果、一根積集善品、五根正知而行、五根證果方便、三根證果。

五、各根之別義

論中一一問答各根名義:五色根各別取自境,第六意根取一切法;男女二根因欲相應即觸所攝;五受根隨順苦、樂、憂、喜、捨處;信根於應得應捨境界;精進根於得捨俱無所憚;念根於聞思修憶持不忘;定根即奢摩他、毘鉢舍那;慧根為所知真實;未知欲知根攝方便道五根義,已知根攝學果五根義,具知根攝無學果五根義。

六、根之體性分類

論中從三性分類:七色根以色為義,命根為假法非有色非無色,餘十四根以色無色為義。就有漏無漏:七色根唯是有漏,最後三無漏根及苦、憂根之外,餘有漏無漏通;苦根有漏無漏以有漏為義,憂根有漏以有漏無漏為義。

Related