Dharma · AI Companion

思慧

cintāmayī-prajñā

由如理思惟教法所生的智慧AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

三慧依四谛缘起教法思择而立(第一重);大乘思慧转缘般若、思择空义(第二重),现证则属修慧不入本条。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Definition in One Sentence: *Cintāmayī-prajñā* (思慧, Wisdom Produced by Reflection) is the cognitive capacity that relies on conventional terms and strictly conforms to heard teachings (*依止名字,唯如聞*). While it does not constitute immediate or direct liberation (*非現前解脫,非現證解脫*), it serves as a dynamic bridge that progressively aligns the mind with liberation (*轉轉隨順解脫*) and functions as an indispensable reflective lens for discerning Suchness (*能識真如*).


What This Concept Is Saying: Its Place in the Path to Liberation

To understand *cintāmayī-prajñā* (思慧) in Buddhist epistemology and soteriology, one must first locate it within the foundational triad known as the "Three Kinds of Wisdom" (*三慧*, *trividhā prajñā*): 1. **Hearer’s Wisdom (*聞慧*, *śrutamayī-prajñā*): Receptive understanding derived from listening to the Dhamma or studying textual teachings. 2. Reflective Wisdom (*思慧*, *cintāmayī-prajñā*): Internalized, critical examination and intellectual digestion of what was heard. 3. Meditative Wisdom (*修慧*, *bhāvanāmayī-prajñā*)**: Direct, experiential realization cultivated through meditative absorption (*samādhi*) and insight (*vipassanā*).

In Northern Wei Bodhiruci’s translation of the *Sūtra on the Elucidation of the Hidden Meaning* (*深密解脫經*, T0675), the Buddha responds to Bodhisattva Maitreya by breaking down *cintāmayī-prajñā* into four essential, interlinked dynamics:

1. Dependence on Names and Concepts (*依止名字*)

Unlike meditative wisdom (*修慧*), which eventually transcends conceptual mediation, reflective wisdom strictly operates within the framework of language, terms, and conceptual designations (*名字*, *nāma*). It uses logic, internal questioning, and conceptual mapping to analyze truth. It does not invent new truths; rather, it uses the map provided by the teachings to explore the terrain mentally.

2. Strictly Conforming to the Heard, Not Yet Fully Aligned with Mind (*唯如聞,不如是隨順心*)

This classic classical formulation pinpoints the exact boundary of *cintāmayī-prajñā*: * **"Strictly Conforming to the Heard" (*唯如聞*)**: The scope of reflection remains anchored in, and loyal to, the verified teachings (*śruta*). It is not wild speculation or arbitrary philosophizing. * **"Not Yet Fully Aligned with Mind" (*不如是隨順心*)**: The cognitive process has not yet merged seamlessly with one's intrinsic awareness. The mind still experiences a subtle subject-object duality: "I" am reflecting on "the concept of non-self". The wisdom is present as an intellectual lens, but it has not yet transformed into immediate, effortless, non-conceptual realization (*修慧*) where subject and reality merge (*隨順心、隨智可知法*).

3. Progressive Alignment with Liberation (*轉轉隨順解脫*)

Is conceptual reflection useless if it does not yield immediate enlightenment? The *Sūtra* explicitly states: *cintāmayī-prajñā* is "not immediate liberation" (*非現前解脫*), nor is it "direct realization of liberation" (*非現證解脫*). However, its vital function is that it "progressively aligns the mind with liberation" (*轉轉隨順解脫*). It works like a steering wheel: while turning the wheel does not instantly teleport you to your destination, it continuously reorients your direction away from delusion and toward liberation.

4. One of the Three Mindful Contemplations for Discerning Suchness (*三種觀心,能識真如*)

The text groups *śrutamayī*, *cintāmayī*, and *bhāvanāmayī-prajñā* together as the "Three Kinds of Mindful Contemplations" (*三種觀心*). The Buddha stresses that without practicing the mind of reality (*如實心*), one cannot perceive the true characteristics of phenomena. Reflective wisdom is not mere sterile intellectualization; it is an active contemplative state of mind (*觀心*) that gradually unmasks illusions and prepares the consciousness to "perceive Suchness" (*能識真如*).


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To see how *cintāmayī-prajñā* operates—and where people usually confuse it with other mental states—let us trace a modern scenario through the lenses of the three wisdoms.

The Scenario: An Agonizing Midnight Slack Message

You are a project manager. At 10:00 PM, your supervisor drops a blunt message in the company channel criticizing your team's quarterly deliverable and hinting at a performance review. Immediately, your heart races, your stomach tightens, and a flood of anger and anxiety surges.

``` [ Hearing / Learning ] ──► [ Reflective Analysis ] ──► [ Direct Realization ] (聞慧 - Listening) (思慧 - Cintāmayī) (修慧 - Bhāvanāmayī) "I read that emotions "Why am I angry? Is this Instant, non-reactive are impermanent." criticism my identity? spacious awareness in the It is just words & data." heat of the moment. ```

* **The Stage of Hearing (*聞慧*)**: You previously read in a Buddhist book or heard in a podcast that "all conditioned phenomena are impermanent" and "the ego is a constructed narrative." That is *聞慧*—you remember the concept accurately. But right now, reading the Slack message, that memory sits in your head like a book on a shelf while your body vibrates with rage.

* **The Stage of Reflection (*思慧*)—The Walkthrough: Instead of immediately typing a defensive, angry reply or drowning your stress in late-night comfort food, you pause and initiate Reflective Wisdom (*思慧*)**: 1. *依止名字 (Relying on Terms)*: You deliberately activate conceptual frameworks: *"What is this feeling? This is 'fear of loss of status.' What is this Slack message? It is text on a screen—pixels triggering past conditioning."* 2. *唯如聞 (Strictly Conforming to the Heard)*: You check your reflection against the teachings: *"The Dhamma says form, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness are not a permanent 'self.' This panic is just a feeling (*受*) and a mental formation (*行*). It is arising due to conditions."* 3. *不如是隨順心 (Not Yet Fully Aligned with Mind)*: You notice that despite this clear mental analysis, your heart is still pounding. Your body has not completely let go. You are still mentally holding the concept at arm's length. This is the exact boundary of 思慧: your logical mind understands the truth perfectly, but your total embodied state has not yet fully merged with it. 4. *轉轉隨順解脫 (Progressive Alignment)*: By repeatedly applying this structured inquiry over 15 minutes, the intense emotional charge drops from a 9/10 to a 4/10. You close the laptop and go to sleep without causing a workplace crisis. You have not attained full liberation (*非現前解脫*), but you have successfully steered your mind away from reactivity and closer to freedom (*轉轉隨順解脫*).

Where People Map This Concept Wrong

* Mistake 1: Mistaking Overthinking for 思慧. Sitting on the couch obsessively ruminating—*"Why did my boss say that? What if I get fired? How will I pay mortgage?"*—is not *思慧*. That is unwholesome proliferation (*papañca*, 戲論) driven by ignorance and fear. *思慧* must be *唯如聞*—anchored in valid teachings of non-self, impermanence, and cause-and-effect. * Mistake 2: Mistaking an "Aha!" Intellectual Moment for 修慧. When someone logically understands how the ego is constructed and exclaims, *"I get it! The self is an illusion!"*, they often believe they have attained realization (*修慧*). In reality, if that understanding vanishes the moment someone insults them, it was merely *思慧* (Reflective Wisdom).


Why Contemporary People Need It

In our modern era, *cintāmayī-prajñā* is perhaps the most underappreciated step in personal transformation. Modern culture pushes us toward two unhelpful extremes:

1. Over-Information Without Reflection (*闻* without *思*)

We live in an age of hyper-consumption. We devour podcasts, self-help books, executive summaries, and Dhamma talks while commuting or doing chores. We amass vast stores of *聞慧* (information). However, without taking time for quiet, structured reflection (*思慧*), this knowledge remains superficial clutter. It creates the illusion of spiritual or intellectual growth while leaving our emotional habits completely unchanged.

2. The Desire for "Instant Experience" Without Grounding (*修* without *思*)

Concurrently, there is a strong demand for quick fixes—micro-dosing, rapid retreat intensives, or bio-hacking mental states. Many seek to jump straight from hearing a concept to direct realization (*修慧*). But without the analytical clarity of *思慧*, raw meditative or altered experiences are easily misinterpreted. People often mistake brief sensory calm or high-arousal experiences for spiritual awakening, reinforcing their egos rather than dismantling them.

The AI and Algorithm Parable

Consider modern Large Language Models (LLMs). An AI can process the entire Buddhist Canon in seconds and generate immaculate essays on Emptiness (*Śūnyatā*). Does the AI possess *cintāmayī-prajñā*? * No. An AI operates entirely at the level of syntactic token manipulation (*依止名字* in a purely mechanical sense). It lacks the subjective contemplation (*觀心*) that turns language into genuine internal inquiry. * For human beings, *思慧* is precisely the bridge that converts external data (*聞*) into internal orientation (*轉轉隨順解脫*). It is the unique human capacity to turn language inward and ask: *"How does this principle apply to my actual suffering right now?"*


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

1. "Isn't conceptual thinking an obstacle to enlightenment? Shouldn't we eliminate all thoughts?"

Clarification: It is a common misconception in modern mindfulness circles that all language and conceptual thought (*名字*) are inherently bad or delusive. The canonical teachings show otherwise: *cintāmayī-prajñā* must rely on terms (*依止名字*). Language is the raft used to cross the river. You do not discard the raft while you are still in the middle of the current. Reflective wisdom uses pure, aligned concepts (*如理思惟*) to dismantle impure, distorted concepts (*顛倒妄想*).

2. "If 思慧 cannot grant immediate liberation (*非現前解脫*), why not skip it and go straight to meditation (*修慧*)?"

Clarification: As the *Sūtra* notes, *cintāmayī-prajñā* is a mandatory component of the "Three Mindful Contemplations" (*三種觀心*) required to perceive Suchness. Without the thorough mental sorting provided by *思慧*, a meditator sitting on a cushion will simply mistake their deep-seated subconscious biases, fantasies, or subtle dullness for "insight." *思慧* provides the precise cognitive map that prevents meditation from devolving into mere self-hypnosis.

3. "Is 思慧 just basic critical thinking or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)?"

Clarification: While *思慧* shares techniques with CBT (such as examining thought patterns and questioning assumptions), their ultimate horizons differ: * CBT / Critical Thinking: Primary goal is psychological adjustment—replacing an irrational thought with a more functional, socially adaptive thought to feel better within the world. * 思慧 (Reflective Wisdom): Primary goal is liberation (*隨順解脫*) and perceiving reality as it is (*能識真如*). It uses reflection to dismantle the fundamental illusion of a static self, pulling the root out from suffering altogether rather than merely reorganizing comfortable concepts.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在《深密解脱经》(元魏菩提流支译)中,「思慧」(cintāmayī-prajñā)被定位为介于「闻慧」与「修慧」之间的关键修行阶段与智慧形态。佛陀在回答弥勒菩萨关于修行义及三种慧之差别的提问时,明确界定了思慧的修行特质。思慧的核心要义在于:它在修行实践中仍然需要「依止名字」(即依赖言语、概念和教法的名相);在心境关系上,它表现为「唯如闻,不如是随顺心」;在解脱效能上,它虽「非现前解脱」亦「非现证解脱」,但具备「转转随顺解脱」的动态递进功用。此外,思慧与闻慧、修慧共同构成了「三种观心」,是修行者用以「能识真如」的重要智慧基础。

二、 主要阐述

《深密解脱经》对思慧的阐述主要围绕其修行特征、解脱层次以及在认识真如中的观照作用展开,具体表现在以下四个维度: 1. 思慧修行义与名相依止:根据经文,弥勒菩萨向佛陀请教关于「闻慧、思慧、奢摩他、毘婆舍那」等修行义的差别。佛陀在定义「思慧修行义」时指出,思慧与闻慧在认识论上具有共同的起点,即两者皆需「依止名字」。这意味着思慧的展开不能脱离语言文字、教法名相以及逻辑概念。修行者在思惟佛法真理时,必须以听闻到的教法为基础,通过名言系统进行内在的推求与审虑。 2. 唯如闻与心之关系的局限与超越:经中提出了一个独特的命题,即思慧「唯如闻,不如是随顺心」。这一表述深刻地揭示了思慧的局限性与过渡性。所谓「唯如闻」,是指思慧的思惟活动完全依循、符合所听闻的教法内容,是对闻慧所获知识的进一步消化与确认;而「不如是随顺心」,则表明此时的智慧尚未达到完全随顺自心、随智可知法的境界。这种完全随顺自心、与法相应的境界是「修慧」的特征。因此,思慧虽比闻慧更进一步,但仍未达到修慧那种心境冥合、现量证知的状态。 3. 转转随顺解脱的动态定位:在解脱的进程中,思慧处于一种承前启后的动态位置。经文指出,思慧「非现前解脱,非现证解脱」。这说明仅凭思慧的思惟与推求,修行者无法在当下现前证得最终的涅槃解脱。然而,思慧并非与解脱无关,它具有「转转随顺解脱」的功用。这意味着思慧能够起到辗转引导、逐步随顺的作用,为最终走向现证解脱(修慧阶段)奠定不可或缺的智力与意向基础。 4. 作为能识真如的「三种观心」之一:在探讨如何认识宇宙法界的「真如」实相时,弥勒菩萨询问佛陀是依何等心、观何等真如而宣说「不修行如实心者不能见诸一切法相,修行者见」之义。佛陀明确回答,此义是依「三种观心」而说,这三种观心即是「闻慧、思慧、修慧」。佛陀强调,正是这「三种观心能识真如」。这表明思慧不仅仅是抽象的理论推导,它本身就是一种观照心,是修行者在心性上逐步契入、认识真如实相的必经通路。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《深密解脱经》(《深密解脫經》,元魏菩提流支译)中,关于思慧的论述展现了极其独特且系统化的术语体系。这些独特的译语和表述形式在其他同本异译或相关部类经典中可能存在不同的呈现: 1. 「思慧修行义」与「三慧异相义」:本经使用「思慧修行义」来专指思慧的修行内涵,并将闻、思、修三者的差别与特征总结为「三慧异相义」。这种将「修行义」与「异相义」并提的结构,是本译本的独特组织方式。 2. 「唯如闻,不如是随顺心」:此句为本经刻画思慧特征的独特表述。它精准地定位了思慧「依傍听闻」却「未达自心随顺」的中介状态,在汉译佛典中具有高度的辨识度。 3. 「转转随顺解脱」:本经用「转转随顺解脱」来描述思慧与修慧在趋向解脱过程中的动态递进特征,强调了解脱是一个渐进、辗转相资的过程,而非一蹴而就。 4. 「三种观心」:本经将闻、思、修三慧统称为「三种观心」,并指出其功能在于「能识真如」。这一术语将「慧」直接与「观心」相联系,突出了思慧等智慧形态在心性观照上的实践指向。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 思慧与闻慧的关系:两者在修行起点上具有共通性,皆属于「依止名字」的阶段。然而,闻慧侧重于对教法名相的初步听闻与接受,而思慧则是在听闻的基础上进行内在的思惟与审虑。思慧是「唯如闻」的深化,它将外在的听闻转化为内在的思惟,但两者都还未能脱离对语言概念(名字)的依赖。 2. 思慧与修慧的关系:思慧与修慧存在着本质上的层次差异。思慧是「唯如闻,不如是随顺心」,而修慧则是「随顺心、随智可知法」;在解脱效能上,思慧「非现前解脱,非现证解脱」,仅能「转转随顺解脱」,而修慧则能引导修行者真正现前、现证解脱。思慧是修慧的前导,修慧是思慧的实践升华。 3. 思慧与奢摩他、毘婆舍那的关系:在修行体系中,弥勒菩萨将「闻慧、思慧、奢摩他、毘婆舍那」并列提问,表明思慧与止(奢摩他)、观(毘婆舍那)等禅修实践密切相关。思慧作为「三种观心」之一,为毘婆舍那(观)提供了正确的思惟方向与理论指导,是止观双运中不可或缺的智慧要素。 4. 思慧与真如、观心的关系:思慧并非孤立的思辨,它与闻慧、修慧共同构成「三种观心」。这三种观心是修行者认识「真如」的工具。思慧通过对教法的如理思惟,使修行者能够逐步「能识真如」,从而打破「不修行如实心者不能见诸一切法相」的局限,最终见诸一切法相。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 关于思慧的修行特征与解脱定位: 「弥勒菩萨摩诃萨白佛言:『世尊!云何名为闻慧修行义?云何名为思慧修行义?云何名为奢摩他修行义?云何名为毘婆舍那修行义?云何名为三慧异相义?』」 「佛告弥勒菩萨:『……思慧修行义者,依止名字,唯如闻,不如是随顺心,非现前解脱,非现证解脱,转转随顺解脱,是名思慧修行义。』」 2. 关于思慧作为观心能识真如的论述: 「弥勒菩萨白佛言:『世尊!依何等心、观何等真如,说不修行如实心者不能见诸一切法相,修行者见?』佛告弥勒菩萨:『弥勒!依三种观心,观三种真如。何等为三?一者闻慧,二者思慧,三者修慧。此三种观心能识真如。』」

By SutraAI-generated

菩提道次第廣論B0067 · 藏傳論典部

《菩提道次第廣論》論「思慧」,主要使用「思所成慧」與簡稱「思慧」二種術語,並以「如理思惟所聞諸義」說明其生成方式:先從他人聽聞教法,依他力對所聞義發起定解;其次以聖教與正理如理思惟,由自力獲得決定。故此處的思慧,不只是泛泛思考,而是對已聞法義加以如理觀擇後所生的確定智慧。

本論把聞、思、修安立為前後相生的次第:聞所成慧以聞為先,思所成慧以思為先,修所成慧則以修為先;而修慧所修習的,正是思慧已經決定之義,所以明言「修慧從思慧生」。由聞思而遠離疑惑、獲得決定,再對所決擇義數數串習,方名為修。由此可見,思慧既承接聞慧,又是修慧的直接所依與前行。

在修行方法上,本論特別破斥把觀察思擇僅限於聞思階段、認為正修時只能止修的見解。它指出,對聞思所決擇之義,既須有不加觀察的安住止修,也須有以觀慧思擇的觀察修,二者俱不可缺。所引《莊嚴經論》之意,亦是依先前聽聞而如理作意,繼而生起修所成慧及真義現觀;因此,觀擇並非修行的障礙,而是使所聞法義轉成確定見解並進入修習的重要環節。

本論又以數量上的相應關係顯示思慧的重要:多聞愈多,依聞所成之慧亦愈多;由此思惟愈多,思所成慧便不致鮮少;思慧增多,則修行增多,進而能滅除眾多過失、引生功德。若不多聞,便無所思,也不知應修何法;若由多聞而思惟所聞法義,則能生思慧,再由思慧生廣大修慧。因此,本論將勤求多聞視為引生思慧不可省略的基礎。

就實際培養而言,本論說應使先前所聞之法在心中整體呈現,並「數數思惟稱量觀察」,藉此令定解堅固。這種由思擇而成的定解,亦使行者能辨別「一切善惡思惟皆應棄捨」之類說法並非教法所許,不致僅憑信心而隨他言轉。故思慧的獨特功能,不僅在於形成知解,更在於以教理觀察建立穩固判斷,使聞得的法義成為可實修的確定內容。

深密解脫經T0675 · 經集部

本經《深密解脫經》將「思慧」置於「聞、思、修」三慧的架構中加以界定,並與奢摩他、毘婆舍那兩種修行相結合來討論。

一、三慧並舉的提問脈絡

彌勒菩薩向佛陀請問:「所言聞慧、思慧、奢摩他、毘婆舍那,三種修行義。此三種慧,云何差別?」 由此可知,本經將聞慧、思慧與奢摩他、毘婆舍那並列為三種修行義,並要求佛陀辨明三慧之間的差別。

二、思慧的定義

佛陀回答:「思慧修行義者,思慧亦依名字,唯如聞,不如是隨順心,非現前解脫,而轉轉隨順解脫,非現證解脫。」 此處明確界定思慧的特質:依於名字(如聞所受),但其心行並非隨順,亦非現前解脫,而是轉轉趨向隨順解脫,屬於尚未現證的階段。

三、三慧差異的對比

本經以多項特徵區分三慧:

(1)聞慧:依止名字,如聞,不稱意,非現前解脫,隨順解脫。 (2)思慧:依名字,如聞,不如是隨順心,非現前解脫,轉轉隨順解脫,非現證解脫。 (3)修慧:依名字、不依名字,依如聞、不依如聞,隨順心、隨智可知法,三昧境界像現前,轉轉隨順解脫、增長解脫。

從中可見,思慧介於聞慧與修慧之間:與聞慧同樣依於名字,與修慧同樣尚未現證解脫;但思慧已開始「轉轉隨順解脫」,不同於聞慧僅是「隨順解脫」,亦不同於修慧能令「三昧境界像現前」並「增長解脫」。

四、思慧與真如觀的關聯

本經亦將三慧與觀察真如相連繫。佛陀說:「我依三種觀說如是義……所謂聞慧、思慧、修慧,三種觀心能識真如。」 由此可知,本經認為聞慧、思慧、修慧三種觀心皆能認識真如,思慧作為其中一環,同樣具有觀照真如的功能。

五、相關術語與獨特側面

本經以「聞慧、思慧、修慧」為三慧之名,並未以其他異名替代此概念,所用術語形式為「思慧修行義」與「三種觀心」。值得注意的是,本經在三慧之外另提出「奢摩他、毘婆舍那」,並以「於差別法相中奢摩他、毘婆舍那般若,是名為智」、「觀諸法無差別相,是名為見」 來界定其與智、見之別。這顯示本經對思慧的討論並非孤立,而是鑲嵌於更廣泛的修行階位與止觀體系之中,以三慧與止觀雙線並陳的方式鋪展其義涵。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》將「慧」分為三種層次,即「聞慧、思慧、修慧」,這是本論對「思慧」一詞最直接呈現其分類位置的表述。經文脈絡是釋提桓因與佛、須菩提論議時自疑所言是否正確,論師回應時提出此三分:「佛說有三種慧:聞慧、思慧、修慧。有人聞慧、思慧明了故,能與修慧人問難。」

這段論述揭示了「思慧」在本論中的幾個重要側面:

一、「思慧」是與「聞慧」、「修慧」並列的智慧類別。「聞慧」由聽聞教法得來,「思慧」由思惟所聞法義而得,「修慧」由禪定實修所生。三者構成深淺次第的三分架構,本論在此明確以「思慧」一名指陳中間這一層次的智慧。

二、「思慧」須達「明了」之境方能發揮問難論議之功。論說「聞慧、思慧明了故,能與修慧人問難」,意即僅具聞慧與思慧尚不足用,還須此二慧通達明瞭、辨析無礙,才能與具有較深修證者展開法義問答,聞思之力方堪與實修相接。

三、論中以「乘船隨流」的譬喻說明聞思之慧的功能:「譬如乘船隨流,不自用力而疾於陸行。」聞慧思慧之人乘法義之流而進,雖非親證,卻能如順水行舟般不費己力而迅速趨入實義,勝於陸地步行之人。這一譬喻形象地顯示思慧雖非親證之智,卻憑藉對教法的思惟而能迅速契入。

四、論中舉阿難為例印證此理:「如阿難雖未離欲,未得甚深禪定,而能與佛、漏盡阿羅漢等論議,隨法無違。」阿難尚未得甚深禪定,未究竟離欲,可見尚未具足修慧;然因具聞慧與思慧之力,故能在與佛及漏盡阿羅漢論議時隨法無違,此即以具體人物示現「聞慧思慧明了」的實際功效。

值得留意的是,「思慧」在此段中並非被孤立地定義,而是作為「聞慧、思慧、修慧」三慧架構中的中階而呈現。本論的關切點在於說明:為何釋提桓因(雖未究竟斷漏、未得一切智)能與佛問答無礙?因為他常從佛聞、誦讀力強,具足聞思之慧,所說有理,故佛印可之。這一問答脈絡凸顯出「思慧」在本論中一個獨特側面:思慧不僅是聞法後修證前的內在中間環節,也可作為論議辯才的資糧,使聞法者與親證者之間的問答成為可能。

綜上,《大智度論》以「聞慧、思慧、修慧」三分表述智慧層次,思慧居中,須達「明了」方可與修慧者論難,並以船行順流、陸步遲緩之喻顯其功效,更以阿難之事作為實例。本論在此段對「思慧」所緣境、思惟具體內容未作進一步展開,而是將其功能定位於聞法之後、修證之前的中間轉化環節。

Related