Dharma · AI Companion

最後身

carama-deha

证悟前所受的最后一次身AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

這個概念在說什麼

In early Buddhist scriptures—specifically the Āgama sutras (*Āgama*, 阿含經)—the term "最後身" (*carama-deha*, the Final Body) refers to the last physical body held in the human world by an Awakened One (a Buddha or an Arhat) before entering Parinirvana without remainder (*anupadhiśeṣa-nirvāṇa*, 無餘涅槃).

It marks the absolute boundary line of an individual’s cyclic existence (*saṃsāra*, 生死輪迴)—the definitive "edge of suffering" (*duḥkhānta*, 苦邊) [3009]. To fully grasp its depth, we must unpack its definition through five distinct layers defined in the canonical texts:

1. The Multi-Faceted Definition: The Five Terminal Aspects

In the *Madhyama Āgama* (《中阿含經》), when the Buddha speaks of his final embodied life, he does not use a single vague term. Instead, he aligns five synonymous terms to map out the total cessation of worldly manifestation [3009]: * 最後生 (*carama-jāti*, Final Birth): The final emerging into a womb or worldly existence. * 最後有 (*carama-bhava*, Final Existence): The termination of the karmic momentum that fuels future becoming. * 最後身 (*carama-deha*, Final Body): The physical vessel carried during this final life. * 最後形 (*carama-rūpa*, Final Form): The external, visible bodily shape and sensory presence in the material world. * 得最後我 (Attaining the Final "Self"): The final conventional usage of "I" in a embodied state before complete extinguishment.

Together, these five terms declare that the infinite chain of rebirths—wherein one has repeatedly discarded physical forms (such as the Buddha’s self-recounted six lives as a Chakravartin / Wheel-Turning King) [3009]—has reached its absolute stopping point. From this life onward, there will be no further taking up of a body among devas, humans, or any realm of existence [3009].

2. The Extinction of the Engine: Upward-Rooting and Stream-Drying

Why is this body the *final* one? Early texts use striking metaphors to explain why rebirth comes to an end: * "已拔陰根本" (Uprooting the Root of the Aggregates) [9999]: Rebirth is sustained by the five aggregates (*skandha*, in older translations rendered as *yīn* 陰 or *yùn* 蘊). Ordinarily, ignorant craving acts as the soil and water feeding these roots. An Arhat has completely uprooted ignorance and craving; the "root of the aggregates" is severed. * "愛識河水流,於今悉枯竭" (The River Stream of Craving and Consciousness Has Dried Up) [9999]: Consciousness (*vijñāna*, 識) normally flows like a river, carried along by the current of craving (*tṛṣṇā*, 愛) to fertilize new lives. In the holder of the Final Body, this current is thoroughly dried up. Without the water of craving, consciousness no longer seeks a new footing in future existence.

3. The Physical Vehicle for Conquest over Afflictions (*Māra*)

The Final Body is not a defeated, pitiful form awaiting death. Rather, the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (《雜阿含經》) highlights it as the ultimate physical vehicle through which a practitioner subdues all internal afflictions and external disruptions: "持此最後身,摧伏魔怨敵" (Holding this Final Body, subduing the forces and enemies of Māra) [10556, 10578]. It represents the culmination of spiritual victory—the earthly instrument through which total freedom is embodied and demonstrated before the world.

4. The Transcendent Attitude: Living on "Remaining Momentum" (*Yúshì*)

How does an Arhat or Buddha relate to this remaining physical body? * "朽壞身,餘勢之所起" (A decaying body, propelled only by remaining momentum) [9999]: The physical body continues to exist for its natural lifespan simply because past karma set it in motion—much like a fan that keeps spinning for a few moments after being unplugged. The engine is off, but the inertia remains. * "不樂於死,亦不願於生,正智正繫念,唯待終時至" (Neither delighting in death nor clinging to life, maintaining right wisdom and mindfulness, simply awaiting the final hour) [3178, 9999]. The saint harbors neither attachment to survival nor suicidal aversion to bodily decay. The body is viewed with absolute equanimity.

5. Linguistic Usage Without Ego-Clinging: Conventional Language (*Ji假名*)

When an Arhat possessing the Final Body says "I am hungry," "I preach," or "My robes," do they still hold an ego? The *Saṃyukta Āgama* explicitly clarifies: "善解世名字,平等假名說" (Skillfully understanding worldly designations, speaking merely through equal conventional names) [6735]. When an Arhat uses the word "I" (*wǒ* 我) or "Mine" (*wǒ-suǒ* 我所), it is not born of conceit (*māna*, 慢) or self-grasping, but is purely a practical linguistic tool used to communicate with ordinary beings [6735].

6. The Genesis of the Final Body: "Noble Quest" (*Ariya-pariyesanā*, 聖求)

The Final Body does not happen by chance. It is the fruits of the "Noble Quest" (*shèng-qiú* 聖求) [4759]. The "Ignoble Quest" (*fēi-shèng-qiú* 非聖求) consists of beings—themselves subject to aging, sickness, death, and sorrow—frenetically chasing after money, status, relationships, and sensory pleasures that are equally subject to aging, sickness, and death [4759]. In contrast, the Noble Quest begins when one candidly acknowledges one's vulnerability to decay and turns inward to seek the birthless, ageless, deathless, and sorrowless state—Nirvana [4759].


生活里的走查

To understand how the "Final Body" functions conceptually, let us walk through a day in modern life, mapping our everyday experiences onto the classic definitions—and uncovering where contemporary people routinely misapply these dynamics.

``` [The Ignoble Quest Loop] ──> Craving/Inertia ──> Projecting "Next Iteration" │ (Insight / Uprooting) ▼ [The Final Body Mindset] ──> Living out "Remaining Momentum" ──> "Neither Delighting nor Abhorring" ```

Scene 1: The Late-Night Overtime & The Iterative "Next Life"

* The Modern Experience: You are sitting under fluorescent lights at 11:00 PM, revising a project deck. You are physically exhausted, yet your mind is racing: *"If I land this promotion, I can upgrade my apartment next year; then I'll finally feel secure."* * The Mapping: In early Buddhist psychology, this mental loop is precisely how reincarnation operates on a moment-to-moment level. The "river of craving and consciousness" (*ài-shí hé shuǐliú* 愛識河水流) [9999] is flowing at full speed. Your current fatigue (the physical aggregate) is treated merely as a sacrifice for a projected future state (*bhava*, "becoming" or "the next existence"). * The Mismapping: Modern people think "rebirth" only means literal physical reincarnation after death. But every time you rely on an imagined future achievement to justify present suffering, you are engaged in the "Ignoble Quest" (*fēi-shèng-qiú* 非聖求) [4759]—using a temporary, decaying condition to pursue another temporary, decaying condition. * The "Final Body" Perspective: Imagine carrying out that same work, but the driver of personal greed has completely shut down. The work is done thoroughly out of duty or compassion, but no "future self" is being built upon it. The mind recognizes: *This current body is merely running on remaining momentum (*yúshì* 餘勢) [9999]. There is no "next version of me" that I need to fabricate.*

Scene 2: Social Media Personal Branding & "Conventional I"

* The Modern Experience: You edit your social media bio, curating your identity, panicking when follower counts drop or when someone misinterprets your comments. * The Mapping: This is the deep attachment to *rūpa* (form) and the conceit of "I" (*māna* 慢). * The Mismapping: People often believe that to lose ego means becoming incapable of using language, abandoning job titles, or refusing to say the word "I." * The "Final Body" Perspective: The *Saṃyukta Āgama* notes that an Arhat still says "I" and "My" [6735]. The distinction lies in "善解世名字,平等假名說" (understanding conventional names and speaking without delusion) [6735]. An Arhat uses a smartphone app or a professional title like an actor uses a costume. They know it is a functional designation (*jiǎmíng* 假名), not a permanent soul. They interact with the digital space seamlessly, but zero self-worth is attached to the outcome.

Scene 3: Body Optimization vs. Aging Anxiety

* The Modern Experience: You spot a new grey hair or wrinkle in the bathroom mirror. You instantly research anti-aging supplements, biohacking routines, or cosmetic procedures. Conversely, when sick, you fall into deep despair, feeling betrayed by your body. * The Mapping: This swings between grasping for "survival/youth" (*zhǒng-zhǒng ài* 貪生) and hatred toward "decay/death" (*yàn-sǐ* 厭死). * The "Final Body" Perspective: The Arhat views the body as an "朽壞身" (a decaying vessel) [9999]. Because they do not view the physical form as "me" or "mine," they handle illness and aging with profound grace: "不樂於死,亦不願於生,正智正繫念,唯待終時至" (Neither delighting in death nor clinging to life, waiting for the end with right mindfulness) [3178, 9999]. They treat the body like a rented automobile—servicing it when needed, but never crying when the lease eventually expires.


當代人為什麼需要它

Why does a concept rooted in ancient monastic liberation matter to people living in an era of algorithms, artificial intelligence, and constant hustle?

1. An Antidote to the "Infinite Upgrade" Burnout

Contemporary culture operates on a paradigm of endless iteration. We are encouraged to view ourselves like software operating systems that constantly need version updates (Better Body 2.0, Financial Independence 3.0). This generates an insidious, quiet panic: *I am never complete; my current state is merely a rough draft.*

The concept of the Final Body introduces the radical idea of Completeness (*suǒ-zuò yǐ-zuò* 所作已作, "what was to be done has been accomplished") [6733]. It reminds us that peace does not come from optimizing the next iteration, but from pulling out the underlying engine of restless craving. It offers a paradigm where an individual can say: *The cycle of endless self-perfection stops here.*

2. Re-framing the Body: From "Object of Vanity" to "Instrument of Liberation"

Modern life tends to reduce the human body to two extremes: either an object of aesthetic display/monetization, or a mechanical tool to be squeezed for productivity until it breaks.

The Final Body restores dignity to physical existence without falling into physical worship. The body is acknowledged as a temporary, fragile construct ("decaying body"), yet it is honored as the high-stakes arena where afflictions are conquered ("持此最後身,摧伏魔怨敵") [10556]. The physical form is no longer a vanity project; it is the holy site where clarity is realized.

3. Analogical Insight: The Operating System Without Log-Files

To use a contemporary technical analogy: imagine a computer running an application. Usually, every action writes heavy log files to disk, generating cache data that dictates how the system boots up next time (Karma).

An Arhat’s Final Body is like running an application entirely in temporary RAM with logging permanently disabled. The system processes inputs perfectly in real-time, but when powered down, no residual data (karmic seed) remains to trigger a reboot. *(Note: While system analogies help visualize non-accumulation, human consciousness involves moral intentionality and qualitative awakening that no algorithmic software possesses.)*


常見誤讀與澄清

誤讀一:「最後身」是一種消極厭世、甚至是渴望自殺的心態?

* Clarification: This is a fundamental misunderstanding. Suicide or self-loathing is driven by the affliction of aversion (*dveṣa*, 瞋) and the desire for annihilation (*vibhava-tṛṣṇā*, 斷滅愛). Early scriptures explicitly state that an Arhat "不樂於死,亦不願於生" (neither delights in death nor wishes for life) [3178, 9999]. * An Arhat does not destroy the body or rush toward death; they simply allow the physical momentum of past karma to run its natural course with total composure and mindfulness ("正智正繫念,唯待終時至") [9999]. The state is characterized by tranquil mastery, not passive escapism.

誤讀二:經文中提到「得最後我」,是不是承認最終存在一個「真實的大我」?

* Clarification: In the *Madhyama Āgama*, the phrase "得最後我" [3009] appears alongside "final birth" and "final body." Some mistranslate this as an endorsement of an eternal Atman/Self. * However, the *Saṃyukta Āgama* directly clears up this linguistic ambiguity: when Arhats say "I" or "Self," they are "善解世名字,平等假名說" (skillfully understanding worldly names, speaking via equal conventional terms) [6735]. They have thoroughly uprooted the view of a real self (*sakkāya-diṭṭhi*, 身見) and conceit (*māna*, 慢). Using the conventional word "I" is merely a practical necessity for human speech, devoid of any ontological self-grasping.

誤讀三:證得「最後身」意味著否定了生命的現實價值?

* Clarification: On the contrary, the Final Body represents the ultimate fulfillment of human existence. It is achieved through the "聖求" (Noble Quest)—the deliberate choice to turn away from addictive, temporary pleasures (*fēi-shèng-qiú* 非聖求) in order to realize unshakeable peace, health, and freedom from sorrow [4759]. Far from denying value, the Final Body demonstrates that human life contains the extraordinary potential to put a permanent end to suffering.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 「最后身」(梵语:carama-deha)是阿含部经典中的重要佛学概念,指佛陀或阿罗汉等圣者在彻底解脱、证入无余涅槃之前,在世间所持有的最后一生肉体。此身是圣者无量生死轮回的终点,也是一切忧悲苦恼的边际,即「苦边」。

二、主要阐述 1. 轮回历史的终结与不复受生:在阿含经典中,「最后身」象征着生死轮回的彻底终结。根据《中阿含经》,佛陀自述其在过去生中曾「七反舍身」,前六次皆转生为转轮王,而这第七次则成就了「如来、无所着、等正觉」,并断言在世间一切天、魔、梵、沙门、梵志之中,绝不可能再次舍身受生。而在《杂阿含经》中,证得阿罗汉果的圣者同样「唯持最后身」,其「爱识河水流」已经枯竭,「已拔阴根本」,这意味着推动生命轮回的根本动力已被彻底斩断,此生之后将不再受生。 2. 摧伏魔怨与展现解脱:最后身不仅是轮回的终点,也是圣者在世间展现彻底解脱、战胜外魔的最终物质载体。如《杂阿含经》所述,比丘若能达到寂静、尽诸漏、离欲并断除诸结的境界,便能「持此最后身,摧伏魔怨敌」或「摧伏众魔军」。这表明圣者凭借此最后的肉身,在世间完成了对一切烦恼与外在魔扰的彻底降伏。 3. 圣者对待最后身的超然态度:对于这最后一生的肉体,圣者展现了极其超然、不执不着的心态。在《中阿含经》中,圣者「不乐于死,亦不愿于生」,而是「随时任所适,立正念正智」。同样地,《杂阿含经》中将最后身视为「朽坏身」,其「余势之所起」将在涅槃之夜永远灭尽。圣者对此身既不贪恋生存,也不厌恶死亡,而是以正智和正念,「唯待终时至」。 4. 最终归宿:当最后身的寿命在世间耗尽时,圣者的最终归宿是无余涅槃。如《中阿含经》所载,圣者将「在竹林下,无余般涅槃」;《杂阿含经》亦指出,最后身熄灭后,圣者将不再染著于三界,进入彻底的「无余涅槃」。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同的经典部类及译本中,关于最后身及其相关概念的用词呈现出明显的差异: 1. 核心术语的并列形式:在《中阿含经》(《中阿含經》)中,佛陀宣告最后身时,使用了丰富的同义术语并列,即「最后生、最后有、最后身、最后形、得最后我」。而在《杂阿含经》(《雜阿含經》)中,则多直接使用「最后身」或「持此最后身」。 2. 「蕴」与「阴」的译语差异:《杂阿含经》在论述最后身的消亡时,使用古译的「阴」来称呼「蕴」,如「已拔阴根本」、「速尽此苦阴」,这与其他译本中常见的「五蕴」或「苦蕴」不同。 3. 烦恼与执着的独特表述:《杂阿含经》频繁使用「有漏」或「诸漏」来指代烦恼(如「已尽诸有漏」、「一切诸漏尽」),并以「爱识河水流」来形象地形容执着与识的生死流转,这些独特译语在《中阿含经》的相关论述中较少以这种特定组合出现。

四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与「我」及「我所」的关系:虽然持有最后身的阿罗汉比丘在世俗上仍有肉体存在,但他们在观念上已经彻底断成了对「我」和「我所」的执着。当圣者说「我漏已尽」或使用「我」这一称呼时,并非出于我执,而是因为他们「善解世名字」,仅仅是顺应世俗的「平等假名说」来进行沟通。 2. 与「圣求」的关系:最后身的成就并非凭空而来,而是通过「圣求」达到的。相较于凡夫染著于妻子、财产等「秽污法」的「非圣求」,「圣求」是指认识到自身处于病、老、死、愁忧戚、秽污法之中,从而精进追求「无病无上安隐涅槃」以及「无老、无死、无愁忧戚、无秽污无上安隐涅槃」。佛陀正是通过这种圣求,最终证得了不再受生的最后身与无上涅槃。

五、代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》卷二十五:「我今最后生、最后有、最后身、最后形、得最后我,我说是苦边。……我于此中间七反舍身。……我于此世天、魔、梵、沙门、梵志,从人至天,无复舍身。」 2. 《杂阿含经》卷二十二:「罗汉比丘,自所作已作,一切诸漏尽,唯持最后身。」 3. 《杂阿含经》卷二十二:「若罗汉比丘,诸漏已尽,所作已作,离诸重担,逮得己利,尽诸有结,正智心解脱,彼亦说言:『我,我所。』……世尊!若罗汉比丘,诸漏已尽,唯持最后身,彼说言:『我说。』不以慢说,彼说:『我漏已尽。』非慢,善解世名字,平等假名说。」 4. 《杂阿含经》卷三十六:「此是朽坏身,余势之所起,于今宵夜分,当永远灭尽。……已拔阴根本,爱识河水流,于今悉枯竭,无复生死分。……不贪于生活,亦不欣于死,正智正系念,唯待终时至。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「最後身」,置於佛陀自述捨身次數的敘事脈絡中。經文記佛告阿難:從拘尸城、惒跋單力士娑羅林、尼連然河、求求河、天冠寺、為我敷床處,於其中間「七反捨身」,其中六反為轉輪王,今第七為「如來、無所著、等正覺」。此處「捨身」即捨棄此一期生命之身,七反捨身構成從凡夫至成佛的完整歷程,而第七次捨身即是最後身所攝——不再是輪迴中的又一次受生,而是輪迴的終結。

本經論述最後身最核心的表述為五項並列:「我今最後生、最後有、最後身、最後形、得最後我,我說是苦邊。」此五項以「最後」統攝,分別從「生」(受生)、「有」(三有、存在)、「身」(此一期色身)、「形」(形相、色身形態)、「我」(此一期假名之我)五個面向宣說其為最後。值得注意的是,本經將「最後身」與「最後形」分列為二,身與形各有獨立所指;又以「得最後我」收束,表明此最後一期並非斷滅,而是有「我」可得,只是此我已是苦之邊際。最終以「我說是苦邊」作結,將最後身直接等同於苦的盡頭,不另立涅槃名目,而以「苦邊」為歸趣。

本經另一獨特側面在於以「不復見」的否定句式強化最後身的絕對性:「我不復見世中天及魔、梵、沙門、梵志,從天至人,更復捨身者,是處不然。」此句遍舉一切世間有情類別——天、魔、梵、沙門、梵志、人——而斷言於其中「更復捨身」之事「是處不然」,即絕無可能。這不僅說自身不再受生,更以遍觀世間的口吻宣示:最後身之後,一切形式的捨身受生皆已止息。

在術語形式上,本經用「最後身」而非「後邊身」「最後有身」等他經異稱;用「捨身」描述一期生命的結束,而非「命終」「捨壽」;用「苦邊」標示最後身的意義歸屬,而非「涅槃」「寂滅」。此等用詞為東晉瞿曇僧伽提婆譯本之特徵,記錄歸一時宜留意。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「最後身」,核心表述為「唯持最後身」,用以描述阿羅漢漏盡之後、般涅槃之前所餘的唯一一期果報身。經中兩處偈頌以幾乎相同的句式出之:「若羅漢比丘,自所作已作,已盡諸有漏,唯持最後身」、「若羅漢比丘,自所作已作,一切諸漏盡,唯持最後身」。「唯持」二字點出此身是僅餘之殘報,非新業所招,亦無後續可言。

本經論此概念最獨特之處,在於將「最後身」與「假名說我」對舉。持最後身之羅漢「說我漏已盡,亦不著我所,善解世名字,平等假名說」;前偈更以反問強調:「唯持最後身,何言說有我,說何是我所」。意謂此身雖在,已無我、我所之執取,言語中所稱「我」不過隨順世間名字之假施設,非有實體可指。此為本經對「最後身」的特定詮釋角度:身存而我執永盡。

在修行面向上,本經以「斷除於後身」為急務,喻之如利劍加害、頭上火燃,須「正念求遠離」。又言「斷除諸愛欲,不求受後身」,將「後身」之斷繫於愛欲之除,不復更受來有。此處用「後身」而非「最後身」,語境從果位描述轉為因地策勵:行者所求者,正令此身為最後,不復有後。

婆耆舍(Vangīsa)臨涅槃偈是本經篇幅最長的實例。偈中自陳「我今是最後,得見於世尊……暮當般涅槃,正智繫正念,於此朽壞身」,以「朽壞身」指稱現前最後一期色身;又言「無復生老死,輪迴悉已斷,不復重受生。愛識河水流,於今悉枯竭,已拔陰根本,連鎖不相續」,從輪迴斷絕、愛識枯竭、五陰根本已拔、相續鏈斷等多重譬喻說明最後身之所以為「最後」的根據。偈末以「念空野龍象,六十雄猛獸,一旦免枷鎖,逸樂山林中」喻羅漢脫離諸有之自在。

另有一偈以年少行者為例:「此賢年少者,逮得上士處,離欲心解脫,涅槃不復生。持此最後身,摧伏眾魔軍」。此處用「持此最後身」而非「唯持」,語氣偏向肯定其功德——最後身非消極之殘餘,而是摧伏魔軍、證上士處之場域。

術語方面,本經一律用「最後身」與「後身」,未見「最後有」「最後生」等異稱;稱色身為「朽壞身」,稱五蘊為「陰」(「已拔陰根本」),皆屬《雜阿含》慣用詞形。

大方廣佛華嚴經(四十華嚴)T0293 · 華嚴部

《大方廣佛華嚴經(四十華嚴)》以「最後身」直接稱呼即將證得究竟果位者現前所住之身,並分別用於聲聞、獨覺與菩薩。其核心意涵不是泛指臨終之身,而是修行果位已臻最後階段、此身之後即將證果或成佛的身分與狀態。

一、就聲聞、獨覺乘而言,經文說修習二乘者受食之後,「皆證聲聞、獨覺乘果,住最後身」,又作「皆證聲聞、辟支佛果,住最後身」。由此可見,本經把「住最後身」與證得聲聞、獨覺之果緊密連說;同一段中「獨覺」與「辟支佛」並用,是本經記述此類果位時實際採用的兩種術語形式。

二、就菩薩而言,「最後身菩薩」指將往詣最勝菩提道場、降伏魔軍而成等正覺者。經文以十方無量世界為範圍,敘述其中最後身菩薩受食後皆赴道場成佛,鮮明呈現最後身與「成等正覺」之間直接而次第相接的關係。

三、本經又以「住最後身」說明菩薩成佛前的受生形態。林神明言:「一切菩薩將成正覺,住最後身」,皆生於王宮或大族婆羅門家,理由是為成就種種利益、調伏自他而令成熟。故最後身雖是成正覺前的最後受生,仍具有利益眾生、成熟自他的具體作用;其受生家族亦被納入菩薩示現與教化的安排。

四、經中著重描寫最後身菩薩「示現受生」的廣大神變。園神自述,無量住最後身菩薩在此世界以種種方便示現受生時,她皆為其母;並以毘盧遮那世尊及往昔無量諸佛為例,將最後身放在成佛前受生、誕生與養育的敘事中。

五、對未來成佛者,本經亦沿用同一表述。彌勒菩薩從兜率天將降神時,示現諸菩薩「住最後身,受生自在廣大神變」,又在人間生於大族之家以調伏眾生;這使「最後身」同時連結降神、受生、出生於大族及成熟眾生等環節。

六、經文進而以「功德圓滿住最後身」概括賢劫中將成佛的諸如來,並把範圍擴展至華藏莊嚴世界海、十方一切世界海及盡未來際。凡修行普賢行願、為調伏眾生而以自在力現受生者,皆在此最後身受生的廣大圖景中被陳述。

總括而言,本經的固定用語主要有「住最後身」、「最後身菩薩」及「功德圓滿住最後身」。其獨特側面在於,不僅以此標示證果、成佛前的最後一次受身,更集中展開最後身菩薩的降神、投生王宮或大族、示現誕生、利益自他、調伏眾生及往詣道場成等正覺;整體論述以廣大世界與無量未來成佛者為背景,突出最後身受生的自在神變與教化功能。

Related