Dharma · AI Companion

眼界

cakṣur-dhātu

十八界中能见色的眼根界。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

比照批1根尘类判例:根界止于遮破式读法,不入「空即是色」一路正面重立。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What Is *Eye Element* (*Cakṣur-dhātu*)?

One-Sentence Definition: Eye Element (*Cakṣur-dhātu*) refers to the specific domain or realm (*dhātu*) belonging to the eye sensitivity/organ—the first of the Eighteen Elements (*Aṣṭādaśa-dhātavaḥ*)—which early canonical texts describe as the irreversible starting point of dependent origination and Mahāyāna texts illuminate as fundamentally empty, ungraspable, and ultimately tranquil.


What This Concept Is Actually Saying

In contemporary language, the word "vision" or "horizon" (*yǎnjiè* 眼睛的界限/眼界) usually refers to someone's breadth of mind, worldly wisdom, or intellectual perspective. However, in Buddhist metaphysics and epistemology, Eye Element (*yǎnjiè* 眼界, Sanskrit: *cakṣur-dhātu*) carries a precise, foundational meaning within the framework of the Eighteen Elements (*Aṣṭādaśa-dhātavaḥ*).

To understand Eye Element, we must first unpack its canonical components and structural position within Buddhist liberation doctrine (*mokṣa-mārga*).

1. The Core Meaning of *Dhātu* (Element/Realm)

The term *dhātu* (界) implies boundary, realm, constituent, or distinct sphere of reality. The cosmos of sentient experience is not a monolithic blob; it is categorized into distinct realms of cause and condition. In early texts like the *Saṃyuktāgama* (*Zá Āhán Jīng* 雜阿含經), the Buddha emphasizes "the diversity of elements" (*zhǒngzhǒng jiè* 種種界).

The Eye Element (*cakṣur-dhātu*) is distinct from the Sight-Object Element (*rūpa-dhātu* 色界) and the Eye-Consciousness Element (*cakṣur-vijñāna-dhātu* 眼識界). * **Eye Element (*cakṣur-dhātu*)**: The subtle, physiological-perceptual capacity or visual organ (*cakṣur-indriya*), defined classically as "subtle/pure matter derived from the four great elements" (*sìdà suǒ chéng qīngjìng sè* 四大所成清淨色). It is the internal receptive basis (*ādhyātmika-āyatana*). * **Sight-Object Element (*rūpa-dhātu*)**: The external visual form, color, or shape. * **Eye-Consciousness Element (*cakṣur-vijñāna-dhātu*)**: The moment of awareness that registers visual data when internal organ and external object meet.

Crucially, the early canons state: *"The Eye Element is distinct, the Sight-Object Element is distinct, the Eye-Consciousness Element is distinct"* (*yǎnjiè yì, sèjiè yì, yǎnshíjiè yì* 眼界異、色界異、眼識界異). They are functionally interdependent, yet structurally discrete.

2. The Engine of Samsara: The Irreversible Chain of Dependent Origination

In the *Saṃyuktāgama*, Eye Element is not presented as a passive piece of biology, but as the initiating threshold of sensory experience, binding sentient beings to suffering (*duḥkha*).

The Buddha outlines two strict, one-way chains of dependent origination (*pratītyasamutpāda*) rooted in the Eye Element:

1. The Primary Chain of Craving: $$\text{Eye Element} \xrightarrow{\text{gives rise to}} \text{Eye-Contact} \xrightarrow{} \text{Eye-Feeling} \xrightarrow{} \text{Eye-Craving}$$ *(*Jiè $\rightarrow$ Chù $\rightarrow$ Shòu $\rightarrow$ Ài* 界 $\rightarrow$ 觸 $\rightarrow$ 受 $\rightarrow$ 愛)*

2. The Secondary Chain of Proliferation & Pursuit: $$\text{Eye Element} \xrightarrow{} \text{Contact} \xrightarrow{} \text{Feeling} \xrightarrow{} \text{Perception/Thinking} \xrightarrow{} \text{Desire} \xrightarrow{} \text{Evaluation/Thought} \xrightarrow{} \text{Fever/Agitation} \xrightarrow{} \text{Seeking/Compulsion}$$ *(*Jiè $\rightarrow$ Chù $\rightarrow$ Shòu $\rightarrow$ Xiǎng $\rightarrow$ Yù $\rightarrow$ Jué $\rightarrow$ Rè $\rightarrow$ Qiú* 界 $\rightarrow$ 觸 $\rightarrow$ 受 $\rightarrow$ 想 $\rightarrow$ 欲 $\rightarrow$ 覺 $\rightarrow$ 熱 $\rightarrow$ 求)*

The Strict One-Way Rule: Early texts heavily emphasize the non-reversibility of this chain: *"It is not because of Eye-Contact that Eye Element arises; rather, because of Eye Element, Eye-Contact arises."* (*Fēi yuán yǎnchù shēng yǎnjiè, dàn yuán yǎnjiè shēng yǎnchù* 非緣眼觸生眼界,但緣眼界生眼觸).

Why is this subtle distinction crucial for liberation? Because it isolates the foundational sensory organ (*dhātu*) as the baseline condition upon which consciousness and emotional afflictions assemble. When Eye Element and Sight-Object Element meet in the presence of latent emotional dispositions (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral, i.e., *xǐchù* 喜處, *yōuchù* 憂處, *shěchù* 捨處), the three combine (*sānshì héhé* 三事和合) to produce Contact (*sparśa* 觸), triggering feelings (*vedanā* 受) and instantly igniting craving (*tṛṣṇā* 愛).

3. The Ultimate Metaphysics: The Metaphor of the "Empty Fist"

While early Āgama texts map out the causal engine starting at the Eye Element to help practitioners intercept craving at the source, Mahāyāna scriptures—such as the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dà Bǎojī Jīng* 大寶積經)—elevate the analysis to ultimate truth (*paramārtha-satya*).

Here, the Tathāgata’s "Power of Knowing Various Elements" (*zhǒngzhǒng jiè zhìlì* 種種界智力) reveals that Eye Element possesses no intrinsic nature (*svabhāva*). The sūtra uses the famous Metaphor of the Empty Fist (*kōngquán zhī yù* 空拳之喻): > *A clenched empty fist deceives a young child into believing there is treasure inside. When opened, nothing is there. Similarly, the Eye Element and eye organ possess no inherent essence ("eye-entity is ungraspable, organ-entity is ungraspable"). It appears as a fleeting phenomenon only to delude ignorant worldly beings.*

The sūtra analyzes the Eye Element through three dimensions of emptiness: Internal Emptiness (*nèi kōng* 內空), External Emptiness (*wài kōng* 外空), and Internal-External Emptiness (*nèiwài kōng* 內外空). Because the visual organ is merely a temporary aggregation of physical elements (*sìdà suǒ chéng* 四大所成), it has no birth or death in reality, cannot be measured by past, present, or future, and is completely devoid of a localized "self" (*ātman*) or "belonging to a self" (*mama-kāra* / 我所).


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To grasp how Eye Element operates according to its exact canonical definition, let us step out of ancient terminology and walk through a modern everyday scenario: scrolling through a short-video feed late at night.

``` [ Eye Element (Physical visual apparatus) + Sight-Object Element (Screen illuminated pixels) ] ↓ [ Eye-Consciousness Element (Visual awareness) ] ↓ [ Three-Factor Harmonies → Eye-Contact (Visual Contact) ] ↓ [ Eye-Feeling (Pleasurable sensation) ] ↓ [ Eye-Perception (Recognizing key visual tags) ] ↓ [ Eye-Desire (Intense interest/wanting more) ] ↓ [ Evaluation/Thought (Mental focus on content) ] ↓ [ Agitation/Fever (Dopaminergic excitement) ] ↓ [ Seeking (Endless scrolling until 2 AM) ] ```

Step 1: The Base Mechanism

You are lying in bed. Your physical eye—the clear biological visual apparatus made of organic cells (*sìdà suǒ chéng qīngjìng sè* 四大所成清淨色)—is the Eye Element. The phone screen firing photons is the Sight-Object Element.

The moment your eye registers the light, Eye-Consciousness Element awakens.

Step 2: The Three-Factor Harmony and Contact

The physical organ (Eye Element), the physical stimulus (Screen), and the cognitive registration (Eye-Consciousness) collide. This harmony is Eye-Contact (*yǎnchù* 眼觸). Notice the canonical order: You cannot have visual contact without the baseline Eye Element already being operational (*"Not because of contact arises the element, but because of the element arises contact"*).

Step 3: The Escalation Chain (*Jiè $\rightarrow$ Chù $\rightarrow$ Shòu $\rightarrow$ Xiǎng $\rightarrow$ Yù $\rightarrow$ Jué $\rightarrow$ Rè $\rightarrow$ Qiú*)

1. **Feeling (*Shòu* 受):** The video displays a highly captivating, bright, amusing scene (*xǐchù* 喜處). A surge of pleasant visual feeling (*lèshòu* 樂受) instantly washes over you. 2. **Perception (*Xiǎng* 想): Your cognitive function immediately categorizes the scene: "This is my favorite creator," or "This is shocking news." 3. Desire (*Yù* 欲): Wanting to see the outcome or watch another video. 4. Evaluation/Thought (*Jué* 覺): Active mental engagement—"I should save this video, I should share this." 5. Agitation/Fever (*Rè* 熱): Your brain enters a hyper-aroused state. Heart rate subtly increases, dopamine spikes, restfulness vanishes. 6. Seeking (*Qiú* 求):** The compulsive physical action—swiping down over and over, hunting for the next hit of visual pleasure until 2 AM.

Common Mismapping in Daily Life

* Misconception: People often say, *"That addictive video made me scroll for hours!"* (Blaming the external object / Sight-Object Element). * Canonical Correction: The Buddha demonstrates that the drive started internally at the Eye Element interacting with internal emotional tendencies (*喜處/憂處/捨處*). The external screen did not force your mind into agitation; the unobserved, unexamined causal chain (*Element $\rightarrow$ Contact $\rightarrow$ Feeling $\rightarrow$ Craving*) ran on autopilot through your visual gateway.

If you can observe the Eye Element right at the threshold—seeing light simply as raw visual input before feeling and craving hijack your nervous system—the entire reaction chain collapses.


Why Contemporary People Need This Concept

1. The Hijacked Visual Economy

Today, human attention is the primary currency of global tech platforms. Recommendation algorithms, high-saturation displays, and micro-animations are specifically designed to exploit human sensory processing. We live in an era where our Eye Element is constantly targeted.

Without understanding the Eye Element as a distinct, conditional entry point, contemporary individuals feel helplessly pulled around by their screen habits. Recognizing the canonical law—that visual craving (*yǎn-ài* 眼愛) is a downstream product of unexamined visual contact (*yǎn-chù* 眼觸)—allows us to intervene at the root: guarding the sense doors (*indriya-saṃvara* 護根).

2. Comparison with Modern Cognitive Science and Neuroscience

Modern neuroscience maps visual perception in a way that strikingly echoes the three-part division of the Eighteen Elements: * Eye Element $\approx$ The retina, photoreceptors, and optic nerve pathways. * Sight-Object Element $\approx$ Photons/reflectance from physical surfaces. * Eye-Consciousness Element $\approx$ Primary visual cortex (V1) activation leading to conscious visual perception.

Neurobiology confirms that sensory input precedes affective valuation and motor reward-seeking behavior (dopamine pathways).

* Limitation of the Neuroscience Analogy: While neuroscience analyzes sensory pathways as a closed material system to explain behavior or design interfaces, Buddhist philosophy analyzes the Eye Element for existential liberation. Neuroscience explains *how* the brain processes light; Buddhadharma demonstrates *how* attachment to visual processing constructs an illusion of a solid self (*ātman*), trapping us in anxiety and agitation.

3. Breaking Illusion via the "Empty Fist"

When we stare at a photo, a partner's face, a bank account balance screen, or a luxury item, we assign intense inherent value to what we see.

Contemplating the Eye Element through the Metaphor of the Empty Fist reveals that the visual organ itself is impermanent, compound, and devoid of intrinsic essence. It is an ephemeral biological lens viewing ephemeral physical forms. Realizing "Eye-entity is ungraspable" (*yǎn yǎn tǐ bùkě dé* 眼眼體不可得) frees us from aesthetic anxiety, visual superficiality, and the endless pursuit of sensory stimulation.


Common Misinterpretations & Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: Conflating "Eye Element" (*Cakṣur-dhātu*) with "Worldly Horizon/Perspective"

* Clarification: In everyday language, "broadening one's eye element/horizon" means reading more books or traveling. In Buddhist scriptures, Eye Element is never a metaphor for worldly knowledge or open-mindedness. It strictly designates the physical/subtle visual sensory base (*indriya*) as one of the Eighteen Elements.

Misinterpretation 2: Reducing Eye Element to Mere "Gross Flesh Eye"

* Clarification: While the physical eyeball is part of the physical body, Abhidharma and sūtra definitions specify Eye Element (or *yǎn-rù* 眼入) as "subtle/pure matter derived from the four elements" (*sìdà suǒ chéng qīngjìng sè* 四大所成清淨色). It represents the refined sensory sensitivity capable of registering light, not just the visible white and black meat of the eye socket.

Misinterpretation 3: Conflating Eye Element (*Cakṣur-dhātu*) with Eye-Consciousness (*Cakṣur-vijñāna-dhātu*)

* Clarification: Eye Element is the *organ/base* (*indriya/āyatana*), whereas Eye-Consciousness is the *cognitive awareness* that arises when organ and object interact. A person under general anesthesia still has an intact Eye Element (biological organ), but Eye-Consciousness is non-functional because conditions for its arousal are absent.

Misinterpretation 4: Believing Liberation Requires Destroying or Rejecting Vision

* Clarification: Early texts explicitly instruct practitioners not to destroy the eyes or hate sight, but to practice "non-attachment to the eye, not generating greedy consciousness dependent on the Eye Element" (*bù zhuó yǎn, bù yī yǎnjiè shēng tānyù shí* 不著眼,不依眼界生貪欲識). The goal is not blindness, but liberation from the bondage of subtle attachment (*yǎnjiè qǔ* 眼界取).

As the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra* concludes: Truly understanding the empty nature of the Eye Element (*yǎn jìn xìng* 眼盡性) opens the Three Doors of Liberation—Emptiness (*śūnyatā* 空), Signlessness (*animitta* 無相), and Wishlessness (*apraṇihita* 無願)—culminating in ultimate unconditioned wisdom (*wúlòu huì* 無漏慧).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「眼界」(cakṣur-dhātu)是佛教关于“界”(界限、界域)学说中的重要概念,被置于“种种界”或“十八界”之首。在《雜阿含經》中,眼界被阐释为众生认识生起、因果缘起链条的起点,强调其与其他界在性质上的差异与独立性;而在《大寶積經》中,眼界则被置于空性与唯名无实的框架中,被揭示为内空、外空、内外空,本质上虚妄无实、毕竟空寂。

二、主要阐述

1. 缘起链条与认识机制 根据《雜阿含經》的论述,眼界是单向因果缘起链条的起点。世尊曾以“眼药丸”为喻,说明诸界数量无量无边,勉励比丘应当“善界学,善种种界”。经中详细阐述了以眼界为起点的两条单向因果链条:其一为“界、触、受、爱”链条,即缘眼界生眼触,缘眼触生眼受,缘眼受生眼爱;其二为“界、触、受、想、欲、觉、热、求”链条,即缘眼界生眼触,缘眼触生眼受,缘眼受生眼想,缘眼想生眼欲,缘眼欲生眼觉,缘眼觉生眼热,缘眼热生眼求。经中特别强调这些链条的单向性与不可逆性,如“非缘眼触生眼界,但缘眼界生眼触”。在认识与感受的生起上,眼界、色界与喜处、忧处、舍处等不同情感倾向结合,作为二因缘生起眼识,三事(眼、色、识)和合生触,进而因缘生起乐受、苦受或不苦不乐受。

2. 空性本质与“空拳”之喻 《大寶積經》则从如来智力与空性角度对眼界进行了彻底的否定。经中指出,如来以“种种界智力”如实了知眼界、色界及眼识界,其如实了知并非执著其为实有,而是“如实知由内空、外空、内外空故”。经中以“空拳”为喻,指出“眼眼体不可得,根根体不可得”,眼及眼根远离了自身的自性,非实物、不生不灭,无法以三世衡量,其显现的虚妄之相只是为了诳惑凡夫,在第一义谛中皆了不可得,犹如梦中乐事。

3. 修行实践与凡圣之别 在修行实践中,两部经典都强调了对眼界应当断除执著。在《雜阿含經》中,尊者舍利弗教导应当修学“不著眼,不依眼界生贪欲识”;尊者摩诃迦旃延亦指出,若能对“眼界取,心法境界系著使”做到“尽、无欲、息、没”(或离、灭),便能达到究竟清净的解脱境界。在《大寶積經》中,若能如实了知眼入空、自性空,便能离于眼入之相,使“空、无相、无愿”三解脱门现在前,证入无男女相、无“我、我所”的如来境界。此外,经中对比了凡圣之别:若对眼的成坏相、尽边、灭坏、寂灭、无去来、无我等常怀迷惑,则堕入凡夫行;若能常通达、无迷惑,则能脱离魔羂,了知“眼尽性”者更能成就“无依戒”、“无漏戒”与“无漏慧”。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典和语境中,针对眼根所属界域及相关概念,存在多种不同的术语表述: 1. 术语的多样称呼:在《大寶積經》中,除了直接使用“眼界”这一术语外,还常以“眼”、“眼根”以及“眼入”等术语进行交替论述。 2. 概念定义的差异:在《大寶積經》中,“眼入”被明确定义为“四大所成清净色”;而在《雜阿含經》中,则更侧重于从“界”的差异性进行定义,如尊者梨犀达多指出“眼界异、色界异、眼识界异”,强调其性质上的独立性。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与色界、眼识界的关系:眼界与色界、眼识界共同构成认识活动的基础。在《雜阿含經》中,三者性质各异,但又互为因缘,三事和合生触并产生相应的受。在《大寶積經》中,如来种种界智力即是如实了知眼界、色界与眼识界之空性。 2. 与眼触、眼受、眼爱等缘起支的关系:眼界是眼触、眼受、眼爱等一系列缘起反应的起点,具有严格的单向决定性,非缘眼触生眼界,而是缘眼界生眼触。 3. 与三解脱门及无漏戒慧的关系:对眼界(或眼入)的空性通达,是引入“空、无相、无愿”三解脱门的关键;了知“眼尽性”则是成就“无依戒”、“无漏戒”与“无漏慧”的必要条件。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《雜阿含經》:“眼界异、色界异、眼识界异。” 2. 《雜阿含經》:“非缘眼触生眼界,但缘眼界生眼触。” 3. 《大寶積經》:“眼眼體不可得,根根體不可得,離眼自性故。” 4. 《大寶積經》:“眼入者,四大所成清淨色。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「眼界」,始終置於「種種界」即十八界之整體框架中。經以「眼界、色界、眼識界」為首,次第列出耳、鼻、舌、身、意各三,合稱「種種界」。梨犀達多答質多羅長者時,以「眼界異、色界異、眼識界異」標舉十八界各各差別之義。阿難為瞿師羅長者進一步說明:「眼界異、色界異喜處,二因緣生識,三事和合生觸」,指出眼界與色界各別為所依、所緣,二因緣和合方生眼識,根、境、識三事和合方生觸。此中「異」字為本經論眼界之關鍵術語,強調界與界之間彼此差別、不相混濫。

本經論眼界最獨特之側面,在於以眼界為緣起鏈之起點,層層推展。基本鏈為:「緣眼界生眼觸,緣眼觸生眼受,緣眼受生眼愛」。經中反覆以否定句式確立方向之不可逆:「非緣眼觸生眼界,但緣眼界生眼觸;非緣眼受生眼觸,但緣眼觸生眼受;非緣眼愛生眼受,但緣眼受生眼愛」。另一經更將鏈延長為八支:「緣眼界生眼觸,緣眼觸生眼受,緣眼受生眼想,緣眼想生眼欲,緣眼欲生眼覺,緣眼覺生眼熱,緣眼熱生眼求」。由是,眼界非靜態分類項目,而是一切心理活動展轉生起之最初所依。

阿難又就眼界所生觸、受,開為喜處、憂處、捨處三類:喜處生樂受,憂處生苦受,捨處生不苦不樂受。此說明同一眼界隨所緣色境之異,可通向三受,非定屬一途。

在修行實踐上,本經以眼界為「取」與「繫著使」之所依。摩訶迦旃延答聚落主長者:「若比丘眼界取,心法境界繫著使,彼若盡、無欲、息、沒,於此法、律究竟邊際,究竟無垢,究竟梵行,畢竟清淨」。此以眼界上之執取盡滅為究竟解脫之內容。舍利弗探病時教給孤獨長者:「不著眼,不依眼界生貪欲識」,將「不依眼界生貪欲識」列為觀照之首項,與不依色界、不依地水火風空識界、不依五陰並列。值得注意的是,此處經文用「五陰」(色陰、受想行識陰)而非「五蘊」,用「貪欲識」而非泛稱煩惱,皆為本經之特定用語。

總之,《雜阿含經》中「眼界」一詞承擔三重功能:一為十八界分類中根界之首,標以「異」字顯其差別相;二為緣起鏈之始端,由之展轉生觸、受、愛乃至求;三為修行所觀之執取處,盡其繫著即歸清淨。經中始終以「眼界」為固定用語,未見「眼根界」等異稱。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志譯)此段於如來十力之「種種界智力」(經中亦稱「非一界種種界智力」)中論及眼界,並非孤立解說眼根一界,而是將眼界置於如來智力與性空的脈絡下理解。經文先總說如來、應、正等覺「以無上智力,如實了知一切世間種種諸界」,謂由種種界故,世間含生集起福行、非福行、不動行,或由此界殖出離種,如來皆如實了知;眼界即在此「種種諸界」之內。

就核心表述言,經云:「如來如實了知眼界、色界及眼識界。如是等界云何知耶?謂如實知,由內空、外空、內外空故。」是知如來了知眼界之方式,為以「內空、外空、內外空」三重觀照而如實知之;且眼界與色界、眼識界合為一組並說,自眼根、色境至眼識,皆歸於空。經文又云「乃至如實了知意界、法界及意識界」,亦以內空、外空、內外空而知,可見十八界中眼界居首、意界居末,皆以同一空理貫之。

就獨特側面言,此經廣列諸界層次:於眼界等十八界之外,復說地、水、火、風四界「如空界故」,欲界、色界、無色界「遍分別所起故」,有為界「造作相故」、無為界「無造作相故」,雜染界「煩惱所引相故」、清淨界「自體光淨相故」,諸行界「不順理無明相故」、涅槃界「順理明相故」。眼界等十八界與此諸界並列,同為如來種種界智力所明了;經謂「若界能安立世間」「能發牽引」「能興建立」「能起方便」「能生意欲」「能起熾然」「能為依止」,如是等界無量無邊,如來皆如實明了,既明了已,「如其所應廣為有情如法演說」。經又形容此種種界智力「不可思議無有邊際與虛空等」,求其邊際不異求人求於空際;菩薩摩訶薩聞之,信受諦奉、清淨無疑,倍復踊躍深生歡喜、發希奇想。

偈頌部分以韻文重申散文所說:「若眼界色界,及以眼識界,耳鼻舌身意,諸界悉能知。又知於法界,及以意識界,內外界悉空,佛能如實知。」仍將眼界、色界、眼識界合說,而以「內外界悉空」收束;又云「如虛空無邊,界無邊亦爾,佛皆能照了,不謂我能知」「諸界本無生,亦無有滅者,是謂涅槃界」,明諸界無生無滅、其量無邊,而佛智亦如空量無邊,「由智能了知,變異於諸界」,終以「已知種種界,調伏諸含生,是佛第四力」結歸。

術語形式上,此經用「眼界」「色界」「眼識界」之稱,與十八界通稱一致,未見異名;其要旨在以如來智力照了諸界、以內空外空內外空顯其性空,視眼界為佛智如實了知與為有情演說之對象,而非就凡夫認識作分析。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以十八界為框架論眼界,核心定義為「四大種所造淨色」。論中引契經言:「眼謂內處四大種所造淨色,有色無見有對」,明確將眼界歸於所造色而非大種性,並以此破斥尊者覺天「十種色處唯大種性」之說。在十八界有見無見之判中,唯色界有見,眼界屬無見。

論中特設「二處同歸一界」之義:肉眼雖有左右二處,仍合立為一眼界,理由有三——類同(二處同是眼自性)、境同(二處同用色為境)、識同(二處同為眼識依),故「眼界雖二而一」,耳鼻舌身亦準此安立。

就成就與不成就,論以四句分別眼界與眼識界之得捨關係:獨得眼界非眼識者,謂生欲界漸得眼根,及無色沒生二三四靜慮地時;獨得眼識非眼界者,謂生上地眼識現起及從彼沒生下地時;俱得者,謂無色沒生於欲界及梵世時;俱非者,除前相。

同分與彼同分之辨中,眼界「於有見色已正當見名同分眼」,即能作自業方稱同分;不作自業則名彼同分。迦濕彌羅國毘婆沙師說彼同分眼有四種:不見色、已滅、正當滅、及不生法;西方諸師則開為五種,將不生法復分有識屬與無識屬。

於「見與非見」之判,論斷言「眼全是見」,以其能明利觀照諸色;而眼識非能見。論證云:傳說眼識不能觀障色,若識是見者,識無對故,壁等不礙應見障色,然實不見,故知見在眼根非在眼識。經說「眼能見色」者,乃「見所依故說能見」,猶如經言「意能識法」。

界地分佈方面,身、眼、色三通五地(欲界及四靜慮),眼識唯在欲界與初定。眼根望身生地「或等或上終不居下」;色與識望眼「下非上」,以「下眼不能見上色故、上識不依下地眼故」。

所識方面,色等五界各為自識及意識二識所識,眼界即眼識所識又兼意識所識。二十二根中,眼根即眼界所攝,「眼等五根如自名攝」。

Related