Dharma · AI Companion

無色

arūpa

不具物质形色的存在状态。AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What this concept is about

In the Buddhist scriptures, 「無色」 (Sanskrit *arūpa*, "the formless") is by no means literally "pitch darkness" or a "physical vacuum," but rather refers to a mental state that transcends coarse material form (色相), an advanced meditative attainment, a contemplative method, and even a mode of existence devoid of material form.

To clarify 「無色」, one must first understand the 「色」 (*rūpa*, "form" or "matter") that it counters and transcends. In the precise Buddhist definition, 「色」 includes all four great elements (四大, *caturmahābhūta*—earth, water, fire, wind) and the material phenomena produced by them—it refers both to our physical body and to all concrete existents in the external world: shapes, colors, sounds, vibrations, and so forth (有對想, perception of resistance; 若干想, perception of multiplicity). 「無色」, by contrast, is the extremely profound spiritual dimension that manifests when consciousness sheds its attachment to and limitation by these material phenomena, coarse or subtle.

Within the complete map of the liberation path, 「無色」 plays a role that is crucially important yet extremely prone to becoming a trap—a "way station." The scriptures strictly delimit its position and meaning from the following five levels:

1. As a path of escape for liberation (the fourth emergence realm, 第四出要界): In the *Madhyama Āgama* (《中阿含經》 T26), a practitioner who contemplates with great care the calamities and dangers of "form" (realizing the impermanence, decay, and oppression of the material world) no longer delights in or cleaves to matter, and turns instead to "contemplating the formless" (觀無色). This state of mind, freed from material bondage, is unobstructed and unturbid, and can bring an extremely deep happiness, far from the afflictions and outflows born of form. This is the famous "fourth emergence realm" [3308].

2. As advanced meditative attainments and modes of existence (the four formless concentrations, 四無色定, and the formless realm, 無色界): After transcending all "perceptions of form" (色想), extinguishing "perceptions of resistance" (有對想, the perception of mutual obstruction among material things), and ceasing "perceptions of multiplicity" (若干想, the perception of diversity and difference), the practitioner successively enters the four formless concentrations (also corresponding to the heavens of the formless realm): * Sphere of infinite space (無量空處, *ākāśānantyāyatana*): consciousness transcends material limitation and experiences boundless space. * Sphere of infinite consciousness (無量識處, *vijñānānantyāyatana*): further transcending the mark of space, consciousness roams in boundless consciousness itself. * Sphere of nothingness (無所有處, *ākiñcanyāyatana*): transcending the manifestation of consciousness, one enters the utterly still state of "subtle nothingness." * Sphere of neither perception nor non-perception (非有想非無想處, *naivasaṃjñānāsaṃjñāyatana*): coarse perceptions have ceased; only an extremely subtle perception remains, seeming present yet absent—the summit of worldly meditative attainments.

3. Core warning: "tasting and clinging" to the formless concentrations and the "view of self" (味著與見我): This is the most fundamental watershed between Buddhism and other worldly meditations. * The trap of tasting and clinging: The *Madhyama Āgama* warns that if a practitioner craves the wisdom-experience within the formless concentrations (such as the "taste of the wisdom of emptiness," 空智味, or the "taste of the wisdom of consciousness," 識智味), consciousness will rely upon and bind itself to this state—this still belongs to the limited condition of "mind not abiding inwardly" (心不住內) [4267]. * The delusion of the view of self: Ordinary people and non-Buddhists easily mistake this pure "formless" state for a true "soul" or "great self." The *Saṃyukta Āgama* (《雜阿含經》 T99) sums up this typical wrong view as 「無色是我,餘則虛名」[5467] ("the formless is the self; the rest is an empty name") (or, as the *Madhyama Āgama* puts it, "a small formless [state] is the spirit; a measureless formless [state] is the spirit," 少無色是神、無量無色是神 [3412]). The Buddha clearly states that this is still a "view of self" (見我) delusion born of attachment.

4. Contemplative method and escape from the three realms: In contemplation, "the formless" manifests as the "inner perception of formlessness" (內無色想) in the contemplation of the spheres of overcoming (除處, *abhibhv-āyatana*) [4908]. In the framework of liberation, the formless realm, together with the desire realm (欲界) and the form realm (色界), constitutes the "three realms" (三界, *traidhātuka*). The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (《大寶積經》 T310) emphasizes that a true liberator must "depart from craving for the desire realm; likewise for the form realm and the formless realm" (離於欲界愛,色無色亦然) [17645]—the formless realm is still a barrier to be fully transcended.

5. The Mahāyāna culmination: transcending the opposition of "form and formless": In Mahāyāna scriptures such as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, the bodhisattva's "inconceivable great armor" (不思議大甲冑) reveals the nature of "having no form, no feeling, no perception, no volition, no consciousness—not comprised by the aggregates" (無有色,無受亦無想,無行亦無識,非諸蘊所攝) [14787]. And the most fundamental dharmadhātu (法界, "dharma realm") and the Buddha-mind are described at an even higher dimension: the dharmadhātu is "without mind and without form" (無心亦無色) [17351], while the Buddha-mind is 「非色非非色,非欲非涅槃,佛心無所依,其猶如虛空」[17643] ("neither form nor non-form, neither desire nor nirvāṇa; the Buddha-mind has nothing to rely on—it is like space"). This shows that supreme perfect enlightenment is neither stiff matter (form), nor one-sided empty spirit (non-form), but a free, unattached state that has completely swept away all dualistic oppositions.


A practical walkthrough in everyday life

To truly see 「無色」 and its traps, let us run this concept through scenarios that contemporary people know all too well.

Scenario 1: The "mental emptiness" after a late night at work, and "digital meditation" After fourteen consecutive hours of work, late at night you put on noise-cancelling headphones, turn off all the lights, and play a meditation audio track. At this point, you no longer attend to your exhausted physical body (色, form), nor to the reports on your desk or the phone screen (extinguishing perceptions of resistance and multiplicity). Gradually, you feel the boundaries of your body dissolve; your awareness seems to merge into the vast night sky, and you experience a boundless stillness. * Scriptural mapping: By blocking out coarse "form," you have temporarily experienced a state of spiritual purity similar to the "sphere of infinite space" (無量空處) or the "inner perception of formlessness" (內無色想). * Error mapping: Many people at this moment produce an extremely intense mystical insight: "See—this is the real me! My physical body is just a shell; this formless, imageless consciousness that can perceive emptiness is the true 'great self'!" This is precisely the delusion criticized by the *Saṃyukta Āgama*: 「無色是我,餘則虛名」[5467] ("the formless is the self; the rest is an empty name"). You have merely replaced the coarse physical body (form) with an extremely refined, pure mental state (formless); in essence, you are still searching for an "eternal self."

Scenario 2: "Numb self-forgetting" while scrolling short videos You sit on the sofa and scroll through short videos for three hours without awareness. Your brain enters an extremely faint reactive state—you have no clear thoughts, no intense desires, only mechanical swiping, in a half-numb state that seems both to have thought and not to have thought. * Error mapping: Some people mistake this "thinking nothing, forgetting the body" state for "formless concentration" (無色定) or "emptiness" (空性). * Scriptural mapping: This completely confuses the definitions. The advanced concentration of 「無色」 requires highly focused meditative power and a clear insight into the dangers of form (contemplating with great care the calamities of form, 極重觀色災患) [3308]. The drowsiness and numbness of contemporary people under algorithmic feeding are merely variants of ignorance (無明) and distraction; one has not even clearly seen through coarse "perceptions of form," let alone transcended them.

Scenario 3: Clinging to a "sense of spiritual superiority" and aloofness A contemporary intellectual or seasoned meditation enthusiast loathes the vulgarity of the material world (disenchanted with the desire realm and coarse form) and indulges in the spiritual pleasure of philosophical speculation, artistic contemplation, or high-level meditative states (the taste of the wisdom of emptiness, the taste of the wisdom of consciousness). He feels that people around him who talk about housing prices and food are utterly vulgar, and that only his own spiritual world is supreme. * Scriptural mapping: This is precisely the "tasting and clinging to the formless concentrations" (味著於無色定) against which the *Madhyama Āgama* warns [4267]. He clings to the "taste of wisdom" brought by the formless state; his consciousness relies on and binds itself to this sense of superiority. Although he has left "craving for the desire realm," he has fallen into "craving for the formless"; although he has transcended coarse matter, he is firmly locked in by refined spiritual experience.


Why contemporary people need it

Contemporary society is an era in which "overload of form" and "spiritual alienation" are interwoven.

On the one hand, algorithms, short videos, and consumerism drain our attention with extremely dazzling "form" (visual, auditory, physiological stimulation). Contemporary people generally live in an extreme anxiety and turbidity born of "form." 「無色」, as the wisdom of the "fourth emergence realm" [3308], offers contemporary people an extremely valuable psychological way out: it reminds us that life is not only the single dimension of physical body and sensory stimulation. By clearly observing the impermanence and calamity behind material enjoyment, the human mind is fully capable of actively peeling away its excessive dependence on matter and entering a deep stillness that is unturbid and unobstructed.

But on the other hand, when contemporary people turn to psychology, neuroscience, meditation, or various spiritual practices, they easily fall into the other extreme—"spiritually packaged solipsism."

Against the backdrop of modern neuroscience and AI development, people often draw the following comparisons and analogies: * Contemporary neuroscience, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has found that when deep meditators experience a "sense of emptiness" or "dissolution of self-boundaries," activity in the parietal lobe (the region responsible for spatial orientation and the self/external-world boundary) decreases significantly. This is often used as an analogy for the neurophysiological mechanism of extinguishing "perceptions of resistance" (有對想) in the formless concentrations. * Neuroscience can also simulate a kind of "formless" experience (e.g., through electrical stimulation or drugs), and AI algorithms can even construct a "formless spiritual world" composed purely of data and information streams.

However, this scientific analogy has fundamental limitations: what neuroscience measures is always neuronal electrical activity and biochemical reactions—which, from the Buddhist perspective, still does not escape the coarse and subtle "form-dharmas" (色法) produced by the four great elements; science currently can neither verify the existence of the formless realm as a cosmological plane, nor explain "how to attain complete liberation through eradicating attachment to self."

More crucially, contemporary people easily mistake "the pleasure of spiritual brainwaves" or "a fictional space without bodily sensation" for ultimate liberation. This is precisely the most powerful wake-up call the concept of 「無色」 gives to contemporary people: Even if you, through extremely advanced meditative means—or in the future with technological assistance—free consciousness from the constraints of the body and reach the utterly still states of "infinite space," "infinite consciousness," or even "seeming to have thought and not to have thought," as long as there remains in your mind a thought of "I am experiencing this formless state" (無色是我), you are still inside the cage of saṃsāra in the three realms.

Contemporary people need 「無色」—not only for the "happiness of leaving form" it brings, but also for the wisdom of cutting through attachment that Buddhism reveals *behind* 「無色」: not falling into matter (form), and not clinging to spirit (formless); not trapped by the physical body, and not hijacked by the spiritual privilege of emptiness.


Common misreadings and clarifications

* Misreading 1: Equating "formless" with a physical "vacuum" or "nonexistence." * Clarification: A physical vacuum is still "form-dharma" (色法, space and energy fields). In Buddhism, 「無色」 means that the mind has freed itself from the limitations of material form; it is a highly alert, clear mental state or plane of existence—by no means physical nothingness.

* Misreading 2: Believing that the "formless concentrations" or the "formless realm" is the ultimate nirvāṇa that Buddhism seeks. * Clarification: This is an extremely common misunderstanding. The four formless concentrations belong to "worldly concentrations" (世間定); although the beings of the formless realm have extremely long life spans and no material suffering, when their meditative power is exhausted, they still fall back into saṃsāra. Mahāyāna scriptures clearly state that the attainment of bodhisattvas and Buddhas transcends the five aggregates (五蘊, *pañcaskandha*) and the three realms, and that even toward the formless realm one must "depart from craving" (離於愛) [17645].

* Misreading 3: Thinking that "taking the mind as one's true self and giving up attachment to the body is liberation." * Clarification: The scriptures specifically refute this view. The *Saṃyukta Āgama* directly lists "the formless is the self; the rest is an empty name" (無色是我,餘則虛名) as a serious "view of self" (見我) delusion [5467]. Whether one clings to the physical body ("form is the self") or clings to the soul/pure consciousness ("the formless is the self"), both are, in essence, attachment to self (我執). True liberation is seeing through the fact that "form, feeling, perception, volition, consciousness" are all not-self and not belonging to self, thereby completely breaking all fetters (結縛) [10750].

* Misreading 4: Simply understanding the Buddha-mind's "neither form nor non-form" as "a nothingness that is not anything." * Clarification: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* describes the Buddha-mind as 「非色非非色……其猶如虛空」[17643] ("neither form nor non-form... like space"), precisely to sweep away the limitations of opposition in our language and logic. "Form" represents tangible matter; "non-form" represents intangible spirit or negation. The Buddha-mind transcends the opposition of these two sides—it neither falls into the rigidity of matter nor into the annihilation of emptiness—it is a state of awareness that is perfect, unobstructed, vast, and without reliance.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 在佛学经典中,「無色」(arūpa)主要指超越物质形相的精神状态、禅定境界、观修方法,或指不具物质色相的存在状态。在《中阿含經》、《雜阿含經》与《大寶積經》中,该概念从出离、神我施設、禅定境界、众生分类以及菩萨与佛陀的超越境界等多个维度得到了详细的阐述。

二、主要阐述 1. 作为解脱途径与出离境界(出要界): 在《中阿含經》中,「無色」被视为摆脱物质色相束缚的解脱途径。多闻圣弟子通过极重观察「色」的危害,心便不再倾向、乐著、亲近或信解「色」。此时,修行者转而「觀無色」,使心向、乐、近、信解「無色」。在这种状态下,心无障碍、无浑浊,能获得并致使快乐,远离一切因色而生的烦恼、忧戚与漏,这被定义为「第四出要界」。 2. 作为高级禅定境界与天界存在: 「無色」在常规禅法中处于后位,即「四無色」禅定。修行者在度越一切「色想」、消灭「有對想」、不作「若干想」后,依次进入四种无色定境:一是「無量空處」,成就游于无边虚空;二是「無量識處」,度越空处,成就游于无边心识;三是「無所有處」,度越识处,成就游于无所有;四是「非有想非無想處」,度越无所有处而成就游。然而,经文警示,若比丘执着于这些无色定中的智慧之味(如「空智味」、「識智味」等),心识便会依托、系缚于此,这仍属于「心不住內」的局限状态。此外,在《大寶積經》中,「無色」作为一种天界存在(与色界合称为「色無色」),虽然没有物质形相,但仍属于需要被超越和离欲的对象,修行者应当「離於欲界愛,色無色亦然」。 3. 作为众生分类与存在状态: 《雜阿含經》在描述世间各类众生时,将「無色」用作区分众生存在类别的特征之一。众生被划分为不同的生理与精神层次,包括「無足、二足、四足、多足」等生理形态,以及「色、無色」、「想、無想,非想、非非想」等境界。在所有这些包括「無色」在内的各类众生之中,佛陀明确指出,如来是其中最尊贵的。 4. 破除对「無色」的自我执着: 凡夫在建立自我观念时,常将「無色」视为自我。在《中阿含經》中,表现为「少無色是神施設」或「無量無色是神施設」,并对此产生执着。相反,不执着自我的修行者则不会将「少無色」或「無量無色」施設为自我,从而断除对其的见著。《雜阿含經》也指出,众生的一种典型错误见解是「無色是我,餘則虛名」,即认为无有物质形相的精神状态才是真实的自我,这属于因系著而起的「見我」妄执。通过对五阴(色受想行識)的剖析,了知其「非我及我所」,便能「超出色結縛」,了达一切处而不落入魔境。 5. 超越色相的菩萨与佛陀境界: 《大寶積經》中,菩萨所被的「不思議大甲冑」具有超越物质与精神现象的特征,其「無有色,無受亦無想,無行亦無識」,且「非諸蘊所攝」,完全远离了一切相应与不相应的分别。此外,法界之本质是「無心亦無色」的;而对于「佛心」的描述,则使用了「非色非非色」的表述,表明佛陀的心境既不能用有物质形相的「色」来定义,也不能简单地用否定色的「非色」来概括,而是彻底远离了两边的对立,无所依凭,广阔如虚空。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 自我指代之译名:对于自我的表述,《中阿含經》译为「神」(如「神施設」、「無神施設」);而《雜阿含經》则译为「我」(如「見我」、「無色是我」)。 2. 五蕴与五阴之译名:《雜阿含經》在剖析众生构成时,直接列举「色受想行識」;而《大寶積經》则明确采用了「蘊」这一译名(如「非諸蘊所攝」)。 3. 禅观与克服色想的术语:《中阿含經》使用「除處」指代克服色想的禅观,并有「內無色想,外觀色」的表述;而《大寶積經》则使用「色三昧」来表达通过了达物质形相如泡沫般虚妄不实、不可执持而契入的境界。 4. 无色界及佛心表述:《大寶積經》将色界与无色界合称为「色無色」,并以「非色非非色」形容佛心,这些都是该经在论述该概念时的独特术语形式。

四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与「色」的关系:「無色」是对「色」的超越与否定。如《中阿含經》中通过「觀無色」来出离对「色」的乐著;《大寶積經》中通过「觀色如聚沫」的「色三昧」来达到超越色相的境界。 2. 与「神/我」的关系:凡夫易将「無色」执为自我(「無色是神施設」、「無色是我」),而圣者则通过了知其非我而断除执着。 3. 与「五蘊/五陰」的关系:菩萨的修行境界超越了五蕴的束缚,呈现出「無有色,無受亦無想,無行亦無識」的「非諸蘊所攝」状态。

五、代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含經》:「多聞聖弟子作是思惟:色有災患……彼極重觀色災患已,若心不趣、不樂、不住、不信解色者,彼觀無色……是名第四出要界。」 2. 《中阿含經》:「或有沙門、梵志施設少無色是神,或施設無量無色是神。彼施設少無色是神者,則少無色神見著而著……」 3. 《雜阿含經》:「或有是見、如是說:『無色是我,餘則虛名。』」 4. 《大寶積經》:「非色非非色,非欲非涅槃,佛心無所依,其猶如虛空。」 5. 《大寶積經》:「觀色如聚沫,中無有堅實,不可執持故,是名色三昧。」

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》論及「無色」,主要不是把它建立為一種可獨立執取的實體狀態,而是置於「有色」「有心」「形」以及一切法性空的論述中加以辨明。

一、就「心」與「色」的關係而言,本論明言:「無色不應執有心,有心不應執無色。」其核心在於雙向遮止執取:既不可在「無色」中執定有心,也不可在「有心」時執定無色。原文所用術語正是「無色」「有色」「有心」,並未在此改用其他名稱界定無色之法;論述重點落在「不應執」這一表述形式上。

二、本論又在破除「我」與色的關係時說:「我非有色由我無,是故全無具有義。」此處以「我無」為由,指出「我有色」之義全然不成;接著藉「異如有牛」說明,若以相異而具有某物的方式理解「我有色」,仍不能成立。末句「我色俱無一異性」進一步否定在「我」與「色」之間安立一性或異性。故此段涉及無色義時,側重的不是描述一個離色之我的存在,而是由「我無」及「我色俱無」遮止「我有色」與一異關係的成立。

三、在「無生」的論述中,本論說:「由無生故無色等,故彼不應即是形。」這裡以「無生」連帶說明「無色等」,並據此否定「彼」即是「形」。原文將「色」與「形」分別表述:先說「無色等」,再說「不應即是形」,顯示此處的論證旨在遮止把所論對象直接等同於形色,而非另立一種無形色的實體。

四、本論在總攝諸法時,並列「若有色無色,有為無為法」,把「有色」與「無色」列為相對的法類表述,又與十八界、六觸、六受及有為、無為等共同納入「一切法」。隨後總結「如是一切法,由彼性離空」,表明有色、無色皆在此一切法的性空論述範圍內。此處值得記錄的術語形式,是本論直接使用「有色無色」的成對說法,未另用其他譯名替代「無色」。

綜合而言,本論對「無色」的表述有三個鮮明側面:以「不應執」遮止心與色的固定配屬;以「我無」及「我色俱無一異性」破除我與色的具有、一性、異性;並把「無色」與「有色」並列,統攝於一切法性空之中。全篇相關原文均沿用「無色」一詞,且常與「有色」「有心」「無生」「形」及「有為無為法」相聯而說。

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》(東晉瞿曇僧伽提婆譯)中對「無色」之論述,見於〈出要界〉一節,與「色」對舉而立,屬第四出要界之所觀境。本經以「色」為物質形色之總稱,以「無色」為不具物質形色之存在狀態,二者並非分別施設之兩種境界,而是同一觀照之正反兩面:透過極重善觀色之染著而厭患捨離,遂趣向於無色之澄淨。

本經論述「無色」之結構極為嚴整,其核心表述可分為四個層次。第一層為遮遣:多聞聖弟子極重善觀色故,心便不向色、不樂色、不近色、不不信解色;若色心生,即時融消燋縮,轉還不得舒張,捨離不住色,穢惡厭患色。此處之「色」乃貪瞋癡等煩惱所緣之物質形相,經文以鷄毛及筋持著火中即時融消之喻,形容色心一起便當下銷滅。

第二層為顯證:觀無色,心向無色,樂無色,近無色,信解無色。此五句之結構與前遮遣色之五句完全對應,顯示「無色」非僅為色之否定,而是具有正向趨向、欣樂、親近、信解之積極內涵之存在狀態。

第三層為心之轉化:心無礙,心無濁,心得樂,能致樂。「無礙」「無濁」明「無色」之體性空明無染,「得樂」「致樂」顯其能引生之功德。

第四層為究竟出離:遠離一切色及因色生諸漏煩熱憂慼。解彼脫彼,復解脫彼,彼不復受此覺,謂覺因色生,如是色出要。此明由觀無色故,色所生之諸漏煩熱憂慼悉皆遠離,更不受因色而生之覺,故稱為第四出要界。

本經所用術語值得注意:全節皆以「色」一詞指稱物質形色,未見其他異名;而「無色」之「無」乃遮詮之辭,非另立一實體,乃觀照色法本性空寂之所得。本經將「無色」置於出要界之修證脈絡中,與前三出要界(恚出要、害出要等)並列,顯示「無色」非究竟之涅槃境界,而是對治色執之具體觀門,其範疇屬於阿含部所說之對治染著、解脫漏煩之修行方法。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

一、術語形式 《雜阿含經》以「無色」一詞表述不具物質形色的存在狀態,並無其他異譯別名,徑與「色」對舉構成最基本的二分。經中未見以其他詞彙替代「無色」之情形。

二、作為存在形態之分類 中,佛陀將眾生分為「無足、二足、四足、多足,色、無色,想、無想,非想、非非想」等類別,「無色」在此與「色」並列,指無色界——即無物質形色之存在層次。此分類係以存在形態為劃分依據,「無色」與「色」相對而立,指缺乏物質形色的眾生或存在層次。佛陀於此經宣說:於此一切分類之中,如來最為第一,乃至聖戒亦復如是。

三、作為「我見」所執之對象 中,世尊告諸比丘:何所有故、何所起、何所繫著、何所見我,令諸眾生作如是見、如是說:「色是我,餘則虛名;無色是我,餘則虛名;色非色是我,餘則虛名;非色非無色是我,餘則虛名……」乃至「我非有邊非無邊」,及「一想、種種想、多想、無量想,我一向樂、一向苦、若苦、樂、不苦不樂,餘則虛名」。經文將「無色是我」列為眾生所執的邪見之一,與「色是我」等並陳。「無色」在此被視為眾生可能執為自我的對象之一,反映出在原始佛教教理中,「無色」並非僅是存有論上的客觀分類,亦是顛倒執著的常見所緣。

四、細膩之四句區分 之經文顯示,眾生對「無色」的執取並非僅止於「無色是我」一端,尚包含「色非色是我」(色與無色綜合體)及「非色非無色是我」(超越色與無色二者之絕對體)兩種進階執取,構成「色、無色、色非色、非色非無色」之四句結構,顯示此經對「無色」概念之哲學分析已相當細密。

五、小結 《雜阿含經》論及「無色」時,係以「無色」為基本術語,未見其他譯名異稱。其論述呈現兩面:一是客觀分類層面,將「無色」與「色」對立區分,作為眾生存在形態之一;二是主觀執著層面,將「無色」列為眾生可能執為自我的對象之一,揭示該概念在當時印度宗教哲學中亦為常見之我見所緣。此經之表述為後世理解「無色」概念提供了基礎語料。

Related