Dharma · AI Companion

不定聚

aniyata-rāśi

尚未决定趣向正邪的一类AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Refers to sentient beings who lie between those definitely destined toward the good and those definitely destined toward evil—whose nature is as yet undetermined and who easily drift along with causes and conditions.


What This Concept Is About

In the Buddhist comprehensive mapping of sentient beings’ faculties and future trajectories, the “three groups” (三聚, trayo rāśayaḥ) form an extremely crucial classification system. “聚” (rāśi) means gathering or category. The “three groups” classify all sentient beings into three major communities according to the strength of their “definiteness” in moving toward liberation or falling away:

1. 正定聚 (samyaktva-niyata-rāśi, “the group definitely destined for the good”; also 正性定聚): refers to sentient beings who have already established irreversible right faith and right view, or who have already cut off the delusions of views (見惑, darśana-heya) and entered the stage of the noble ones—whose destiny is “definitely oriented toward the good and certain to reach liberation.” 2. 邪定聚 (mithyātva-niyata-rāśi, “the group definitely destined for evil”; also 邪性定聚): refers to sentient beings who have created extremely grave karmic deeds (such as the five uninterrupted deeds, 五無間業, pañcānantarya-karmāṇi), who stubbornly cling to wrong views, and whose destiny is “definitely oriented toward evil and certain to fall into the bad destinies.” 3. 不定聚 (aniyata-rāśi, “the indeterminate group”; also 不定性聚): refers to the vast majority of sentient beings who lie between the above two—having neither established an unshakable cause of liberation nor committed an irrevocable determined evil karma—whose mind, conduct, and future destiny depend entirely on the “conditions encountered.”

To thoroughly understand 不定聚 (aniyata-rāśi), one must, within the overall coordinate system of the path of liberation, unpack its core doctrine into the following four progressive dimensions:

1. Core Attribute: Lack of Definiteness, Easy Drifting with Conditions

“不定” (aniyata, “indeterminate”) is not some independent, fixed quality, but rather a floating state lacking anchorage. The faculties and mind-nature of beings in the indeterminate group have not yet been “set.” Encounter good spiritual friends (善知識, kalyāṇamitra), pure environments, or conditions of the true Dharma, and they can sprout toward the good; encounter evil companions, defiled environments, or the inducement of wrong views, and they will flow downstream and fall. The scriptures point out that because beings of the indeterminate group lack definitive right faith, their life trajectory is in a state of extreme fluctuation and change—“或向于异趣” (may turn toward different realms of rebirth)—possessing great uncertainty.

2. The Buddha’s “Definitive Knowledge”: Insight Within Indeterminacy

For beings of the indeterminate group, with their chaotic, wavering, unpredictable tendencies, ordinary people see chaos and confusion, but under the Buddha’s wisdom-vision, it is entirely transparent and clear. The 《大宝积经》 (Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra) emphasizes that the Buddha, as the “Great Guide” (大導師, mahānāyaka), is able to achieve “definitive knowledge” (決定知) with regard to all three types of beings—those of the good-definite group, the evil-definite group, and the indeterminate group. Even when beings of the indeterminate group are in the “non-appropriate places” (非處, asthāna) where causes and effects are intricately entangled, and may at any moment turn toward different destinies because of the rising and falling of karma, the Buddha knows their trajectories without omission and without error. This shows that the wavering and indeterminacy of sentient beings’ own minds does not obstruct an awakened one’s clear illumination of the laws of cause and effect.

3. Easily Falling into the Bad Destinies, and Compassionate Rescue Within Them

Because they lack a firm line of defense of right view (正見, samyag-dṛṣṭi), beings of the indeterminate group, in the long flow of birth-and-death, are extremely easily pulled by evil conditions and “堕于诸恶道” (fall into the various bad destinies). However, the 《大宝积经》 reveals an extremely warm and profound doctrine: the Buddha’s rescue does not take as its precondition whether beings have “met the standard.” For beings of the indeterminate group who have sunk into the bad destinies because their nature was not yet determined, the Buddha, even within the bad destinies, “亦为说涅槃” (also teaches nirvāṇa, 涅槃, for them). The faint light of the Buddha’s compassionate vows can penetrate the darkness of the bad destinies, and for beings who have fallen because of their indeterminate state, plant anew the seed of awakening.

4. Its Position in the Causal Network of Liberation and the Pure Land: The Necessary “Conversion of Group”

In the causal network of the Pure Land (淨土, jìngtǔ) and ultimate liberation, 不定聚 is given a rigorous position. As the dialogue between Ānanda and the Buddha in the 《大宝积经》 states, all sentient beings born in that Buddha-land’s Pure Land are able to ultimately attain unsurpassed bodhi (無上菩提, anuttara-samyak-saṃbodhi); and the reason why that land has no beings of the evil-definite or indeterminate groups is that beings in the states of the evil-definite and indeterminate groups “不能了知建立彼因” (are unable to understand and establish the cause for that [birth]).

In other words, “不定聚” itself does not automatically lead to liberation. People in an indeterminate state, because their minds waver and their causes and effects are unclear, cannot establish in the present moment the “definitive cause” that leads to the Pure Land or liberation. Therefore, throughout the entire path of practice, “不定聚” is the starting line for the vast majority of ordinary people’s cultivation; but the central task of cultivation is precisely—through hearing the true Dharma, accumulating provisions (資糧, sambhāra), and establishing vows (誓願, praṇidhāna)—to transform oneself from “wavering and indeterminate” into “正性決定” (definitive orientation toward the good).


A Walkthrough in Everyday Life

We often think of ourselves as “modern people” with principles, opinions, and rational independence. But if we use the rigorous classical definition of 不定聚 to conduct a “walkthrough” of contemporary life, we will find that we perfectly match the characteristics of the indeterminate group the vast majority of the time.

Scenario One: Morning Phone-Scrolling and Algorithmic Conditioning

* The scene: Waking up in the morning, you originally planned to recite sutras, meditate, or read. But your hand unconsciously reaches for your phone, opening social media or short videos. The algorithm, based on your latent desires, pushes a controversial news item; your emotions are instantly stirred; anger, anxiety, or curiosity takes over your brain, and before you know it, half an hour has passed. * Concept mapping: This is a textbook case of “drifting with conditions” (隨緣流轉). The mind has no fixed axis; whatever conditions the environment (the phone and the algorithm) offers, the mind shifts in that direction. * Common mapping error: Many people think, “I’m just casually looking; I can close it anytime,” mistakenly believing they possess control (正定, correct determination). But the classical definition of 不定聚 is precisely this kind of state—thinking one can control oneself, while in reality being extremely easily led by external conditions.

Scenario Two: Workplace Competition and Overtime Involution

* The scene: In daily life, you consider yourself a gentle, kind person. Yet when facing promotion competition, performance pressure, or covert exclusion by colleagues, in order to protect yourself or outdo others, you begin to say things against your conscience, play petty tricks, or even participate in slandering others. Afterwards you feel regret, but in that moment you were entirely swept along by the adverse conditions of the environment. * Concept mapping: This is the classic warning: dwelling in the indeterminate group, one is easily pulled by adverse conditions. Good roots are not yet firm; once encountering high-pressure or interest-conflict adverse conditions, the original “faint goodwill” collapses in an instant, and there is danger at any moment of “falling into the bad destinies” (墮於惡道)—creating evil karma, the mind’s power sinking downward. * Common mapping error: People often explain this as “in the world, one cannot help oneself” (人在江湖,身不由己), considering it a mature survival principle. But in Buddhist doctrine, this “cannot help oneself” is precisely the typical manifestation of being in the “indeterminate” state, because definitive right view has not been established.

Scenario Three: Intimate Relationships and Parenting Anxiety

* The scene: Facing your partner or child, when you are in a good mood and circumstances are smooth, you can be loving and tolerant (turning toward the good); but once you are tired from work, or the other person does not meet your expectations, your irritability, control, and hatred burst forth (turning toward evil). You swing frequently between love and harm. * Concept mapping: This displays the characteristic of the indeterminate group’s “unsettled nature”—one has not committed irrevocable determined evil karma (邪定), but neither has one established unconditional compassion and right mindfulness (正定). The quality of one’s life depends entirely on momentary emotions and external stimuli.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life is extremely complex and fast-paced. This environment amplifies the fragility of 不定聚 to the utmost. There are three crucial reasons why contemporary people should understand and recognize 不定聚:

1. Breaking the Illusory Fantasy of “Self-Control”

Modern technology (recommendation algorithms, the attention economy, dopamine design) is essentially an enormously vast “system of external conditions.” Without the power of correct determination, modern people are like a small boat on huge waves. The algorithm knows your soft spots; public opinion knows your anxieties. Understanding 不定聚 allows us to clearly realize: before we have established firm right view, what we call “free will” is, most of the time, merely a stress response imposed by environment and desire.

2. Beware the Moral Complacency of “The Frog in Warming Water”

Many people think: “I haven’t committed any crime, nor any great evil that violates heaven and reason (not 邪定聚), so I must be a good person.” But the doctrine of 不定聚 reminds us: “not evil” is not the same as “correctly determined.” Not having committed great evil is only because your current environment has not yet pressured you to that point, or because you have not yet encountered a sufficiently large temptation of gain. If one does not actively establish a positive definitiveness, a life in the “indeterminate” state has a far higher probability of falling than rising in the long flow of saṃsāra.

3. Stimulating the Urgency of “Establishing the Definitive Cause”

The scriptures clearly state that being in the indeterminate group means one “cannot understand and establish the cause for that [birth]” (不能了知建立彼因), and therefore cannot respond to the Pure Land or achieve ultimate liberation. The lesson for contemporary practitioners is: practice cannot be entrusted to “letting things take their natural course.” If it is merely a 佛系 (fóxì, “Buddhist-lite”), go-with-the-flow, check-in style of casual cultivation, the undertone of one’s life remains 不定聚. We need to consciously, through hearing and contemplating the true Dharma, observing precepts, and making vows, forge the wavering mind into an unshakable 正定聚 (samyaktva-niyata-rāśi, the group definitely destined for the good), actively establishing for life an irreversible line of defense.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Thinking That “Indeterminate” Means “Buddhist-Lite, Going with the Flow, Open-Minded”—a Transcendent State Worth Pursuing

* Clarification: This is the most common literal misunderstanding of the term among contemporary people. In the modern context, “going with the flow” (隨緣) is often equated with “non-attachment, openness, and tolerance.” However, in classical Buddhism, 不定聚 is by no means a term of praise, but rather a dangerous, fragile state. Its “going with the flow” is a passive drifting—“falling with adverse conditions, rising with good conditions.” On the path of liberation, “不定聚” is a stage one is admonished to cross and transform as quickly as possible, not a reason to remain stagnant.

Misreading Two: Thinking That Because One Usually Accumulates Merit, Does Good Deeds, and Has Correct Worldview and Values, One Already Belongs to the 正定聚

* Clarification: In the rigorous definitions of the scriptures and treatises, the threshold for 正定聚 is very high. In the Hīnayāna abhidharma (阿毗達磨), one ordinarily must realize the path of seeing (見道位, darśana-mārga, at or above the first fruit, 初果) and cut off the delusions of views (見惑, darśana-heya) to be counted as entering the group definitely destined for the good; in the Mahāyāna common teaching (通教, tōngjiào) or the Pure Land approach, one must also establish firm, irreversible right faith and vows. The good deeds done by ordinary people on the basis of worldly morality, though praiseworthy, may still waver and collapse when faced with extreme adversity, illness, or the threshold of life and death. Therefore, the vast majority of worldly “good people” are still in the 不定聚—one must not be blindly self-satisfied.

Misreading Three: Thinking That Once One Falls into “Indeterminacy” or Even Accidentally Falls into the Bad Destinies, One Has Been Abandoned by Buddhism

* Clarification: This is a misunderstanding of the Buddha’s compassionate vows. The 《大宝积经》 particularly emphasizes the Buddha’s “definitive knowledge” (決定悉知) and “teaching nirvāṇa within the bad destinies” (惡道說涅槃). The Buddha not only sees clearly the chaotic trajectories of indeterminate beings, but also does not abandon them because they fell due to wavering. Even if beings sink into the bad destinies because of their indeterminacy, the Buddha’s compassionate vows will still, within the bad destinies, proclaim for them the Dharma of nirvāṇa. This teaching tells us: although an indeterminate life is fragile, the gate of awakening is always open to it—there is absolutely no possibility of utter destruction or eternal abandonment.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在佛教经典中,“不定聚”(aniyata-rāśi)是“三聚”分类之一,用以指代那些介于决定向善(正定聚)与决定向恶(邪定聚)之间的众生。这类众生的根器、行为和未来趋向具有不确定性,既容易受到恶缘影响而堕落,也保留了接受佛陀教化、走向解脱的可能性。在《大寶積經》(《大寶積經》)中,不定聚众生被描绘为处于流转变化中的群体,佛陀对他们的性质、去向有着完全的、决定性的了知,并在他们堕入恶道时仍不舍慈悲,为其宣说涅槃之法。同时,不定聚状态也是往生净土的障碍,众生必须转入正定、建立净土之因,方能究竟往生。

二、 主要阐述

根据《大寶積經》的论述,不定聚众生的特征与佛陀对他们的救度主要体现在以下几个维度: 1. 佛陀的决定悉知:不定聚众生的心性与行为虽然处于不确定状态,但这种不确定性在佛陀的智慧照察下是完全清晰的。经文指出,佛陀作为大觉者,对于“正定”、“邪定”以及“不定”这三类众生,皆能做到“決定知”。即使是那些处于“非處”的不定众生,以及他们因为业力起伏而“或向於異趣”(可能转向不同的流转去处)的复杂情况,大牟尼(佛陀)也都能够完全、无误地知晓。这表明,众生的不确定性并不构成佛陀悉知的障碍。 2. 流转恶道与佛陀的慈悲度化:由于不定聚众生缺乏决定性的正信,也未造作无可挽回的决定恶业,他们的命运随着外在因缘而起伏。经文警示,众生若“住於不定聚”,极易受到恶缘的牵引而“墮於諸惡道”。然而,佛陀的慈悲愿力并不会因为众生堕入恶道而终止。对于这些因性质未定而堕落的不定聚众生,佛陀在恶道中“亦為說涅槃”,为其开示解脱之法,这充分彰显了佛陀不舍任何一个众生的平等悲愿。 3. 净土往生因果中的定位:在讨论极乐世界等佛国净土的往生因果时,经文将“不定聚”作为一种无法建立往生之因的状态。阿难与佛陀的对话中提到,彼佛国土的众生凡是应当往生者,皆能究竟无上菩提,达到涅槃之处。而之所以能够如此,是因为“邪定聚及不定聚”的众生,在当前状态下“不能了知建立彼因”。这说明,处于不定聚状态的众生,必须通过修行转化,脱离不定的状态,建立起往生净土的决定之因,方能感应往生。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志译本)中,对于这一介于正邪之间的众生群体,经文在不同的语境下采用了多种不同的术语形式进行表述。这些表述反映了译者在面对不同梵语语境时的汉译选择: 1. 不定聚:这是最标准的术语,用于整体分类和因果论述中,如“若邪定聚及不定聚”、“住於不定聚”。 2. 不定眾生:侧重于指代具有这种不确定性质的众生个体,如“正定及邪定,及不定眾生”。 3. 不定眾:在偈颂等特定文体中使用的简写形式,如“非處不定眾,或向於異趣”。 与此相对应,对于其他两聚的表述也存在多样性。例如,表示决定向善的群体,经中或作“正定”,或作“正性”;表示决定向恶的群体,或作“邪定聚”,或作“邪定”,或作“邪性決定聚”。这些不同的译词在同一部经的不同章节中并存,体现了译文在保持义理一致性的同时,在词汇选择上的丰富性。

四、 与相关概念的关系

“不定聚”是与“正定聚”(或称正定、正性)和“邪定聚”(或称邪定、邪性決定聚)密切相关的概念,三者共同构成了佛教对众生根器分类的“三聚”系统。 1. 与正定聚的关系:正定聚众生已经决定向善,必定证得解脱或往生净土;而不定聚众生则尚未建立这种决定性的因。如经文所言,彼国(净土)众生皆能究竟菩提,而“不定聚”众生则因“不能了知建立彼因”而无法直接往生。不定聚必须通过听闻正法、积累资粮,转化为正定聚,才能获得决定性的解脱保障。 2. 与邪定聚的关系:邪定聚众生决定向恶,必定堕落;不定聚众生虽然也有“墮於諸惡道”的危险,但其恶业并非决定不可转。在佛陀的慈悲救度下,即使堕入恶道的不定聚众生,也能听闻佛陀“亦為說涅槃”的教化,从而获得转机;而邪定聚在未消尽恶业前则极难回头。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《大寶積經》卷:阿难与佛对话中提及:“若邪定聚及不定聚,不能了知建立彼因。是故彼國,無有如是二種眾生。” 2. 《大寶積經》卷:关于佛陀悉知众生:“正定及邪定,及不定眾生,大牟尼悉知,是名佛導師。” 3. 《大寶積經》卷:关于不定众生的流转:“非處不定眾,或向於異趣,大牟尼悉知,是名佛導師。” 4. 《大寶積經》卷:关于恶道救度:“住於不定聚,墮於諸惡道,亦為說涅槃,是名佛導師。” 5. 《大寶積經》卷:关于三聚分类的对应术语:“入於正性及邪性決定聚。””,

By SutraAI-generated

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》以「三聚」分類框架論述不定聚,將一切眾生趣向判為三等:等聚、邪聚、不定聚。本經對不定聚之界定,核心表述為「不知苦、不知習、不知盡、不知道、不知等聚、不知邪聚,是謂名為不定聚」。由此可見,本經將不定聚定位為對四聖諦(苦、習、盡、道)及正邪二途皆無所知的狀態,其特徵非積極造惡,而是認知上的蒙昧——既不能辨識聖道,亦不能辨識邪道,尚未決定向背,故稱「不定」。

本經術語形式極具特色。八正道在此一律以「等」字冠首,作「等見、等治、等語、等業、等命、等方便、等念、等定」,而非後世通行之「正見、正思維、正語」等形式。其中「等治」一詞尤為特殊,對應通常所見之「正思維」或「正志」。邪聚則以「邪」字冠首,作邪見、邪治、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定,與等聚形成逐支對舉。此「等」字用法為東晉瞿曇僧伽提婆譯本之慣用語,是本部經區別於其他譯本之顯著標記。

本經另設第二組三聚:善聚、等聚、定聚。善聚謂三善根(不貪、不恚、不癡),等聚謂賢聖八品道,定聚謂「知苦、知習、知盡、知道、知善聚、知惡趣、知定聚」。此處「定聚」與前組「不定聚」恰成反義對照:不定聚以「不知」為性,定聚以「知」為性;不定聚於諦理與正邪俱不能辨,定聚則於四諦、善惡、定散皆能如實了知。兩組三聚並列,使不定聚之定位更為清晰:它既非等聚之聖道實踐,亦非邪聚之顛倒妄行,而是處於二者之間、尚未決斷的無明階段。

經末世尊總結教誡:「此三聚中,邪聚、不定聚,當遠之,此正聚者當奉行。」此處將不定聚與邪聚同列為「當遠」之對象,顯示本經對不定聚之態度並非中性放任,而是視為必須超越之階段——雖非邪惡,然因無知而隨時可能趣入邪途,故修行者當主動遠離,趣向正聚。全經以「歡喜奉行」作結,為標準之結集套語。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

本經為《大寶積經》,屬寶積部,唐菩提流志譯。經中論及「不定聚」之原文凡三見,其論述可析為數端。

一、不定聚與邪定聚並舉,同被簡別於淨土往生之外。經告阿難:「彼國眾生若當生者,皆悉究竟無上菩提到涅槃處」,隨即說明其故:「若邪定聚及不定聚,不能了知建立彼因故。」 此處以「不能了知建立彼因」為邪定、不定二聚眾生不得往生之緣由。所謂「彼因」,承上文指往生彼國、究竟菩提涅槃之因;不定聚眾生正因未能了知此建立之因,故不預於「皆悉究竟無上菩提到涅槃處」之列。此處不定聚與邪定聚連類而言,同屬不能了知彼因之類,然二者並非全同——下文另見分疏。

二、不定聚雖未決定趣向,然非棄捨之機。經云:「若有諸眾生,住於不定聚,墮於諸惡道,亦為說涅槃。」 此明不定聚眾生縱然墮於惡道,佛仍為其宣說涅槃。是知不定聚之「不定」,謂其趣向未決,非謂絕無得度之機。與邪定聚之不能了知彼因、被簡別於往生之外者不同,不定聚雖未定,仍可聞法受化;其墮惡道亦蒙為說涅槃,正見其趣向非凝固,而有可轉之性。此為本經論不定聚之獨特側面:既明其局限,又開其出路。

三、佛智於三聚皆能決定知。經以偈頌總括三聚:「正定及邪定,及不定眾生,於此三聚中,佛能決定知。」 此處正定聚、邪定聚、不定聚三者並舉,合稱「三聚」;而佛於此三聚眾生皆能決定知之。眾生雖有正、邪、不定之別,佛智則無不能了知。此句以「佛能決定知」收束三聚,顯不定聚雖在眾生分上為未定之類,在佛智照了之下則非不可知、不可度之域。

術語上,本經逕用「不定聚」之名,與「正定聚」「邪定聚」對舉而成三聚;經文未見以異名稱此不定之聚,亦未改三聚為他名。其論不定聚,皆置於三聚框架之內,或與邪定聚連類簡別於往生之外,或獨舉其墮惡道仍得聞涅槃之可度,或合三聚而歸於佛之決定知。本經用語與概念條目所用「不定聚」一致,未見異稱。

綜上,《大寶積經》之論不定聚,始終不離三聚框架:於淨土往生之脈絡,以「不能了知建立彼因」明其與邪定聚同被簡別;於教化之脈絡,以「墮於諸惡道,亦為說涅槃」示其雖未定而可度;終以「佛能決定知」總攝三聚。其態度可謂既簡別又攝受:簡別者,明其不了彼因、不預往生;攝受者,明其墮惡道仍蒙說法。二者並存,正是本經對「尚未決定趣向正邪之一類」眾生之完整論述。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以三聚分類架構眾生之決定與否,不定聚居其三,為正邪二定之外的一切有情所攝。本論先立頌綱:「正邪不定聚,聖造無間餘」,以「聖」攝正定、以「造無間」攝邪定、以「餘」攝不定,三者互斥而窮盡。

論文明釋三聚之名義:「一正性定聚、二邪性定聚、三不定性聚」。本論所用術語為「不定性聚」,與他經或稱「不定聚」者小異,多一「性」字,與「正性定聚」「邪性定聚」對稱,強調此聚眾生之性屬未決定,非謂其無性。正性之義,本論引契經云「貪無餘斷,瞋無餘斷,癡無餘斷,一切煩惱皆無餘斷,是名正性」;定者謂聖,聖謂已有無漏道生,獲得畢竟離繫得,定盡煩惱,故名正定。邪性之義,本論直指「諸地獄、傍生、餓鬼,是名邪性」;定謂無間,造無間業者必墮地獄,故名邪定。在此二定之外者,即名不定性聚。

不定聚之核心界定,本論以一句收攝:「正邪定餘,名不定性。彼待二緣,可成二故。」此中「待二緣,可成二」為本論論述不定聚之獨特側面——不定非謂無因無緣、混沌無歸,而是謂此類有情之趣向尚未鎖死,遇正法之緣可入正定,遇邪法之緣可墮邪定,其歸趣繫於所遇之緣。此與正定之「畢竟離繫」、邪定之「必墮地獄」形成對照:正邪二定已無轉易,不定聚則猶有轉易之可能。

本論又設問難,辨明順解脫分者何以不攝入正定聚:「諸已獲得順解脫分者,亦定得涅槃,何非正定?」論主以三義遮之:一、彼後或墮邪定聚故,尚未究竟不退;二、得涅槃時未定故,非如預流者極七返有之決定;三、彼未能捨邪性故,不名正定。此三義從反面劃定不定聚之上界——雖已種解脫善根、雖決定終得涅槃,只要尚存墮邪之可能、尚未捨離邪性,仍屬不定性聚所攝。由此可見本論對不定聚之判定標準極為嚴格:非以善根有無為斷,而以「是否已獲畢竟離繫、已捨邪性」為斷。

綜上,本論論不定聚,不另立專章鋪陳,而是於正邪二定義明之後,以「餘」字一句帶出,復以「待二緣,可成二」點出其動態本質,再以順解脫分不攝正定之問難,從上界收緊其範圍。術語上,本論一律用「不定性聚」與「正性定聚」「邪性定聚」並列,三聚之名皆帶「性」字,此為本論之固定用語。

Related