Dharma · AI Companion

意樂清淨

adhyāśaya-pariśuddhi

意乐清净,菩萨以净信、择法及对佛法胜解决定为基础所成就之增上意乐。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

「意樂清淨,菩薩以淨信、擇法及對佛法勝解決定為基礎所成就之增上意樂。」 *"Pure intention (*adhyāśaya-pariśuddhi*) is the superior resolve (*adhyāśaya*) accomplished by a bodhisattva on the basis of pure faith (*prasāda*), discernment of phenomena (*dharma-pravicaya*), and decisive understanding (*adhimukti*) of the Buddha's teaching."*

This sentence may look like an assemblage of Buddhist technical terms, but it actually points to a very concrete—and often overlooked—question in practice: On what foundation does the inner drive within you—"I want to walk this path, I want to become this kind of person"—actually rest? Whether that foundation is stable determines whether you can go the distance.

In the system of the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* (T1579), "意樂清淨" is not an adjective. It is a set of technical terms with stages, criteria, and functional orientation. Below, we unpack it layer by layer.


I. What This Concept Is Actually Saying

1. "意樂" Is Not Ordinary Wish—It Is the Bodhisattva's "Operating System"

「意樂」(adhyāśaya), in its fuller context, is usually written as 「增上意樂」—where 「增上」 means *superior* (adhipati), indicating an intention that is directed upward, toward the highest. The treatise places 「意樂」 within the context of the bodhisattva's entire path of practice. It is not the kind of fluctuating good thought that arises from "I'm in a good mood today, I want to be a kind person." Rather, it is a directional confirmation of the entire bodhisattva path: I will attain *anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi* (unsurpassed, perfect enlightenment), and in that process, I will benefit sentient beings.

This point is crucial. Ordinary "vowing" or "resolving" often works like this: you are moved by something—you make a resolution—a few days later it fades—you are moved by something else—you resolve again. This kind of intention drifts. A bodhisattva's 「意樂」 is not like that. It is defined as the unity of two things: tending toward the attainment of enlightenment and benefiting sentient beings. It is the steering wheel of the entire path.

But the treatise also emphasizes: 「意樂以淨信、擇法為先,對諸佛法所有勝解,印可、理解而達於決定。」— This means that this driving force is not a wish that burns out of nowhere. It is built on a threefold foundation: 淨信 (*prasāda*, pure faith—not blind faith, but a clear trust in the Three Jewels and the fundamentals of the Dharma), 擇法 (*dharma-pravicaya*, discernment of phenomena—knowing what to take up and what to abandon), and 勝解 (*adhimukti*, decisive understanding—reaching the point of "approving, understanding, and determining" the Buddha's teaching; not just thinking about it in the head, but genuinely settling it in the heart).

In other words, the 「樂」 in 「意樂」 (the root *āśaya* carries senses of delight, wish, and intention) is a settled intention that arises after understanding. This distinction is the key to everything that follows.

2. "清淨" Is Not Moral Scrupulosity—It Is the Gauge of Deepened Understanding

When ordinary people hear 「清淨」 (*pariśuddhi*, "pure"), they think of moral purity—no craving or aversion, no mistakes, no defiled thoughts. But what the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* means by 「清淨」 here is not a moral scorecard at the level of wholesome mental factors. It is the quality that intention naturally exhibits once understanding has reached sufficient depth.

Why? Because the foundation of 意樂 is 勝解 (*adhimukti*)—and 勝解 itself has a real trajectory from shallow to deep. When a person's understanding of the Dharma has not yet arrived, their intention necessarily contains vagueness, anxiety, self-reassurance, and over-idealization. None of these are "evil." They are "not yet pure." When understanding deepens to the point of "determination," the wavering elements in intention naturally settle—because their roots have been seen clearly, and they have lost the ground on which they float.

So the gauge of 「清淨」 here is: Can your intention hold steady? If it holds, it is because it is built on genuine 勝解. If it does not hold, it is because it is still built on emotion, identity, or a superficial understanding of the Dharma.

3. Three Layers of Intention: The Sequence from "To Be Disciplined" to "Well Purified"

In the context of the fifteen types of "妙善增上意樂" (excellent superior intention), the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* explicitly divides intention into three layers according to the bodhisattva's stage:

Layer one: 不清淨意樂, also called 「應調伏意樂」 (intention to be disciplined) This corresponds to the bodhisattva's 「勝解行地」 (*adhimukti-caryā-bhūmi*, the stage of practicing based on understanding). A bodhisattva at this stage has already generated bodhicitta and possesses the intention to seek enlightenment above and to deliver sentient beings below. But this intention still needs to be continuously observed, corrected, and refined—hence "to be disciplined." It can give rise to the higher layers of intention that follow, but it itself is still like a sapling swaying in the wind, needing a fence for protection.

Layer two: 清淨意樂 (pure intention) This corresponds to bodhisattvas from the 「淨勝意樂地」 (*śuddhādhyāśaya-bhūmi*) through the 「決定行地」 (*niyatacaryā-bhūmi*). This intention no longer needs to be repeatedly "reminded to generate bodhicitta." It has become an internal, stable state that does not depend on external prompting. Hence the treatise calls it 「俱生意樂」 (*sahaja*, "innate"—intention born together with the mind).

Layer three: 善清淨意樂 (well-purified intention) This corresponds to the 「究竟地」 (*niṣṭhā-bhūmi*, the ultimate stage—the highest stage of bodhisattva practice). This is the perfected form of pure intention: intention has been fully integrated with all of the bodhisattva's realizations, with no wavering whatsoever and not a trace of residual self-projection.

It is worth noting: the umbrella term 「意樂清淨」 covers the second and third layers (清淨意樂 + 善清淨意樂). The first layer is also called 增上意樂, but it is not counted as 意樂清淨—this is a strict terminological distinction written into the original text of the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra*.

4. 意樂清淨 and 加行清淨: Inner Foundation and Outer Renovation

In another passage, the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* lists 「意樂清淨」 and 「加行清淨」 (*prayoga-pariśuddhi*, purity of practice) side by side as two aspects of a bodhisattva's purity, and mentions that 「前三顯示菩薩意樂清淨,後七顯示菩薩加行清淨」—that is, within a certain set of ten dharmas, the first three concern intention, and the last seven concern practice.

This pairing is crucial because it explicitly separates "thinking" from "doing": - 意樂清淨 → purity of inner intention (the foundation) - 加行清淨 → purity of actual practice (the structure and its use)

For one who cultivates the bodhisattva path, 意樂清淨 is the foundation; 加行清淨 is the superstructure. If the foundation is unstable, no matter how beautiful the house, it will lean. But if the foundation is stable and the superstructure is not yet built, neither is the work complete. The two are established separately, yet both are subsumed within the bodhisattva's overall purity—this is the comprehensive framework given by the treatise.


II. A Walk-Through in Everyday Life

意樂清淨 may sound like something that belongs only to bodhisattva stages. But its sequential structure—from "to be disciplined" to "innate" to "well-purified"—actually corresponds to an inner transformation that any long-term practitioner will go through. Below, we walk through it using three contemporary scenarios.

Scenario One: The First Time You Seriously Think, "I Want to Meditate"

You read an article about meditation, or a friend tells you meditation changed their life. That evening you go home, download an app, and decide to sit for twenty minutes every morning at six.

That force inside you at this moment—this is 增上意樂 (*adhyāśaya*)—but it is impure 增上意樂. Why is it impure? Because it is built on three shaky foundations:

- Your understanding of "what meditation is and what it can do" remains at the level of a friend's secondhand account and article summaries—this is not 勝解 (*adhimukti*); it is hearing (*śruta*); - The motivations mixed into your desire to meditate may include "I want to become the kind of person who is calm," "I want to be more focused at work," "I want to stop being anxious"—among these are genuine needs, but also identity projections; - You do not yet know what you will encounter on day three, day seven, day twenty-one—that "beginner's enthusiasm" will fade.

The *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* calls this state 「應調伏意樂」—not to negate it, but to say that it needs to be repeatedly disciplined: observe the process of it arising and falling, see what is mixed into it, and bring it back again and again to the true meaning of the Dharma. The treatise says 「應調伏意樂能引生俱生意樂」—this is precisely its function: it need not be pure, but it must be trained, because the training itself is what paves the way for purity.

Walk-through key point: The most common point of misidentification for contemporary people is equating 「不清淨意樂」 with "insincere intention" or "selfish resolve." The treatise makes no such moral condemnation. 不清淨 here is a diagnostic term, meaning "it is still there, it still needs to be worked on"—this is precisely the starting point of practice, not the endpoint.

Scenario Two: Three to Five Years In, You Sit on the Cushion

Years have passed. You have read the scriptures and treatises, encountered teachers, and gone through several clear rounds of progress and plateau. You no longer get up at six every morning to sit—not because you gave up, but because you discovered you no longer need that "six o'clock" promise. You read the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* not to "finish it," but because its analysis genuinely corresponds to something in your mind; you want to help those around you, but you no longer cling to whether others perceive your kindness.

At this point, that force within you—"I want to walk this path"—is no longer a flame that gets re-lit again and again. It is a background tone—like the light that stays on in the house. You don't decide every morning anew, "Should I turn on the light today?"

This is 「俱生意樂」, and it is also the stage at which 意樂清淨 genuinely begins to hold. The treatise says 「俱生意樂即清淨意樂、善清淨意樂」—because its nature has already been accomplished: "已善巧安立於所依之中" (it has been skillfully established in its support).

In walking through this phase, the easiest misidentification is understanding 「俱生」 as "unconscious," "instinctive," or "without thinking." No. 俱生 here means "able to abide without needing external maintenance added on." Its basis is not unconsciousness; it is 勝解 (*adhimukti*). When 勝解 has deepened to a certain degree, intention no longer depends on the repeated tug-of-war of emotion or willpower.

An analogy: when you first learn to drive, "I should press the clutch before shifting gears" requires reminding yourself at every step; once you are skilled, the whole motion is fluid, requiring almost no thought—but you are not "driving unconsciously." You simply have sufficient 勝解 with respect to driving. Likewise, 俱生意樂 is not blind intuition. It is a stable state that naturally appears when understanding has matured.

Scenario Three: When You Doubt Everything

A very realistic walk-through scenario: after ten years of practice, you suddenly hit a long low period. A loved one dies. Your health breaks down. Your confidence in your teacher wavers. You begin to doubt the very meaning of the entire path.

Does "pure intention" disappear at this point?

The treatise's answer is: if it is truly 俱生意樂, it will not disappear due to changes in external circumstances, because its foundation is 勝解, not emotion. At the same time, the treatise does not say that a bodhisattva never experiences doubt. Rather, it says that doubt itself becomes the occasion for 「應調伏意樂」 to be re-refined.

This is what the phrase 「應調伏意樂能引生俱生意樂」 means in life: doubt and wavering are not the opposite of purity; they are the material that makes purity deeper. The precondition is that you are willing to return to 勝解 and work on it anew, rather than letting doubt carry you into nihilism.

Walk-through key point: The most common error among contemporary practitioners is equating 「清淨意樂」 with "always steadfast, never wavering." The purity spoken of in the treatise is not a monolith. It is a stability built on 勝解 that can bear doubt.

A Passing Walk-Through: Why Some People "Know a Lot" but Do Not Go Far

In contemporary practice circles, there is a typical figure: fluent in theory, skilled in terminology, articulate about the Dharma—but after years, almost no real transformation is visible in their life. Walking through this in terms of 意樂清淨, the treatise's diagnosis is clear—his 加行 (*prayoga*, practice) may be diligent at some level, but his 意樂 is not necessarily pure.

Conversely, there is another type: plain and kind in daily life, generous to others, steady in work, but never speaks of the Dharma and has no concept of "unsurpassed enlightenment." Walking through this, you find that such a person may possess qualities with a temperament close to pure intention. But because their foundation is not 淨信, 擇法, and decisive understanding of the Buddha's teaching, the treatise does not include them within the scope of 意樂清淨—this is only the level of ordinary worldly good-heartedness, not the 意樂清淨 of the bodhisattva stages.

What is distinctive about 意樂清淨 is that it must be founded on 勝解 of the Buddha's teaching—this is the key that distinguishes it from worldly good-heartedness.


III. Why Contemporary People Need It

意樂清淨 is not an abstract bodhisattva-studies concept. It has at least three practical meanings for contemporary practitioners.

First, it gives you a ruler to measure which layer your current resolve is actually at.

Many contemporary practitioners repeatedly ask: "Am I really making progress?" "What I am doing now—is it driven by fame and profit, or do I genuinely want to benefit others?" "Is my confidence in my teacher truly pure, or is it just dependency?"—These questions all find a place within the three-layer framework of 「應調伏意樂 / 俱生意樂 / 善清净意樂」. When you know which layer you are at, you have direction, rather than repeatedly doubting yourself in vagueness.

Second, it reveals the real relationship between "understanding" and "intention."

Contemporary practitioners tend to narrow "practice" down to "behavior management"—managing emotions, managing speech, managing craving, aversion, and delusion. But the treatise places the foundation of 意樂清淨 on 勝解, which is equivalent to saying: the real transformation of intention does not happen at the behavioral level; it happens at the level of understanding. The moment you no longer need to "make an effort to generate bodhicitta" is often the moment your understanding has arrived—once understanding arrives, intention naturally stabilizes.

This insight is especially important for contemporary people, because we live in a culture of "holding on through willpower"—work held up by willpower, relationships held up by willpower, practice held up by willpower. But 意樂清淨 points out that there is another way: let understanding arrive first, and let intention naturally abide. This path is not necessarily easier, but it is stable.

Third, it provides a key coordinate for the overall sequence of the bodhisattva path.

The *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* places 意樂清淨 within the sequence of "grounds" (*bhūmi*): 勝解行地 → 淨勝意樂地 → 決定行地 → 究竟地. This means that 意樂清淨 is not a separate subject outside of practice, but a stage marker within the bodhisattva's entire cultivation sequence. When contemporary people speak of "practice stages," it often becomes vague and mystical, but the coordinate given by the treatise is quite concrete: the ground you are on determines what state your intention is in. This is a standard you can look back at.

As a side-by-side observation from contemporary cognitive science (purely as analogy, not equivalence): neuroscience observes that the formation of intentions and habits does involve a transformation from "controlled processing" to "automatic processing"—long-term training can shift certain behavioral patterns from dependence on willpower to a relatively spontaneous internal state. This observation has a structural correspondence to the treatise's description of the sequence from 「應調伏」 to 「俱生」. But it must be made clear: what Buddhism calls 勝解 involves a thorough understanding of the true nature of all phenomena, which is not on the same level as the automation of patterns studied by neuroscience; the analogy is only for aid in understanding, and cannot be reversed to claim that "science has proven the reality of 意樂清淨"—this is a matter of respecting the boundaries between two systems.


IV. Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: "意樂清淨 = Good Intention"

This is the most common narrowing. The treatise places the foundation of 意樂 on the three layers of 淨信, 擇法, and 勝解, explicitly distinguishing it from ordinary good wishes. Good intention belongs to the worldly level; 意樂清淨 belongs to the bodhisattva stages—the latter must be rooted in decisive understanding of the Buddha's teaching. If you simply "want to be a good person," that is good-heartedness; if, on the basis of pure 勝解, you tend toward unsurpassed enlightenment and benefit sentient beings, that is the bodhisattva's 意樂.

Misreading Two: "清淨 = No Defiled Thoughts / No Wavering"

Equating purity with "never wavering" is one of the deepest attachments of contemporary practitioners. The purity in the treatise is built on 勝解, and 勝解 itself can bear doubt, wavering, and re-examination—because 勝解 is not blind belief. 清淨的意樂 does not mean "I have no defiled thoughts in my mind." It means "my intention is built on genuine understanding, and therefore it can hold steady." This is a different thing from "never wavering."

Misreading Three: "意樂清淨 Is a State Achieved All at Once"

The three-layer structure (不清淨 → 清淨 → 善清净) explicitly indicates: 意樂清淨 is a process with stages. From 勝解行地 to 究竟地, the degree of purity of intention differs. Even within the scope of 「意樂清淨」, there is still the distinction between 「清淨意樂」 and 「善清淨意樂」. Treating it as a practice that can be completed in a single awakening flattens the sequential structure.

Misreading Four: "意樂清淨 = 加行清淨"

The treatise explicitly lists the two as different aspects of purity: the former is the purity of inner intention (the foundation), the latter is the purity of actual practice (the superstructure). One can have pure intention while practice is still rough (this is the state of a bodhisattva at the 「決定行地」); one can also be diligent in practice while intention is not yet pure (this is the common state of a bodhisattva at the 「勝解行地」). Equating the two will cause you to stall at one level of practice—thinking that because your "intention is pure" you can relax your practice, or that "diligent practice" equals "pure intention."

Misreading Five: "As Long as I Make a Vow, My Intention Is Pure"

Making a vow is the starting point, not the endpoint. Vowing falls within the scope of 「應調伏意樂」—it can give rise to 俱生意樂, but it itself is not 俱生意樂. Treating the starting point as the endpoint is a recurring problem in contemporary practice circles—many people take "I have made a vow" as proof of pure intention, but the treatise's criterion is whether 勝解 has arrived and whether intention has already "accomplished its nature and been well established."


Conclusion

意樂清淨 is not a label to be worn on the sleeve. It is a real, observable, verifiable inner state along the entire bodhisattva path. What is distinctive about it: it shifts the center of gravity of practice from "whether one's actions are right or wrong" to "what foundation one's intention rests on." Whether what you do is right or wrong is the concern of 加行清淨; what that force inside you—the force with which you do these things—is built on, is the concern of 意樂清淨.

What contemporary people most easily overlook is that the foundation of this force is often loose. The reason it is loose is not that we "are not trying hard enough," but that we rarely actually look back at where our intention arises from. The three-layer structure and the foundation of 淨信, 擇法, and 勝解 given by the treatise are precisely an invitation: to look at that force within you—"I want to walk this path"—clearly, deeply, and steadily.

This is a quiet but extremely critical project in the bodhisattva path. It is not under the spotlight, but it determines everything.


Primary source basis: T1579 *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* (The Discourse on the Stages of Yogic Practice), original text on 意樂清淨, 增上意樂, 應調伏意樂, and 俱生意樂 (chunk:28926, 28927, 28688, 28984).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

定义与核心要义

意乐清净(adhyāśaya-pariśuddhi),即菩萨内心意向之清净。此处「意乐」非一般善愿,而是以净信、择法为先,对诸佛法所有胜解,印可、理解而达于决定之上所建立的殊胜意向。其清净之义并非仅止于善心所之层面,而是强调建立于胜解决定之上,并与菩萨所处阶位相应,而具有趣证菩提、饶益有情之功能。

主要阐述

《瑜伽师地论》论述「意乐清净」时,主要采用「清净意乐」「增上清净意乐」「意乐清净」等术语;在十五种「妙善增上意乐」的分类中,又以「清净意乐」与「善清净意乐」标示不同阶位的意乐状态。此处的「意乐」以净信、择法为先,指对诸佛法所有胜解,印可、理解而达于决定;故其清净并非仅是一般善愿,而是建立于胜解决定之上的殊胜意向。

一、阶位差别。 本论明确区分「不清净意乐」「清净意乐」及「善清净意乐」三层:胜解行地所有一切增上意乐,名为「不清净意乐」;从净胜意乐地乃至决定行地所有一切增上意乐,名为「清净意乐」;到究竟地所有一切增上意乐,则名为「善清净意乐」。因此,本论所说意乐清净具有次第差别,并以菩萨所处之地界定其名称。

二、对应名称。 本论将「不清净意乐」称为「应调伏意乐」,因为此种意乐尚应加以思择;将「清净意乐」与「善清净意乐」合称为「俱生意乐」,因为其意乐之性已成就,并已善巧安立于所依之中。这组对应是本论的重要用词:应调伏意乐即不清净意乐,俱生意乐即清净意乐、善清净意乐,并非另立互不相关的种类。

三、功能与作用。 「应调伏意乐」能引生「俱生意乐」;俱生意乐则能使菩萨迅速趣证无上正等菩提,并为天、人作诸义利,令其获得利益安乐。本论并总摄过去、未来、现在菩萨于无上正等菩提的证得,皆由所说十五种意乐;由此可见,清净意乐被安置在整体增上意乐次第及其趣证作用之中。

四、与布施之关系。 本论谈布施时另用「增上清净意乐」一语。尚未证得者,即使现无财物,仍可凭工巧、说法、劝化及身语协助等方便行施;已证增上清净意乐的菩萨,则如已得超越诸恶趣一般,生生必定获得无尽财宝。此段从布施资具与菩萨行的相续,呈现证得增上清净意乐后的殊胜侧面。

五、与加行清净之并举。 本论又以「意乐清净」与「加行清净」并举,说某十法略显二义:前三种显示菩萨意乐清净,其余七种显示菩萨加行清净。由此可知,本论将内在意向之清净与实际加行之清净分别施设,而又置于同一略义之中加以统摄。

不同部类与译本的表述差异

本条目之文献依据目前仅见于《瑜伽师地论》(《瑜伽師地論》,瑜伽部)之论述。就同经异译而言,玄奘译本使用「意乐清净」「清净意乐」「增上清净意乐」「善清净意乐」「不清净意乐」等词;其他梵本、藏译本及别译是否存在用词分歧,则俟进一步校勘后补述。其他经论是否另立「意乐清净」之相关名相,亦待进一步比对。

与相关概念的关系

《瑜伽师地论》中,「意乐清净」与下列概念关系密切:

一、增上意乐。 「意乐清净」非独立概念,而是置于「增上意乐」之总体语境中加以施设,是增上意乐在特定阶位上之特殊形态。

二、应调伏意乐与俱生意乐。 此二者为本论用以重新统摄意乐清净之方便语:不清净意乐即应调伏意乐,清净意乐与善清净意乐即俱生意乐。三层名称与二种功能分类互相对应而非另立。

三、加行清净。 「意乐清净」与「加行清净」为本论并举之二义,前者侧重内心意向之清净,后者侧重实际修行之清净;二者分别施设而又统摄于同一略义之中。

四、胜解。 「意乐」以净信、择法为先而达于胜解决定,故意乐清净之根基即在胜解,与单纯之善愿有别。

代表性原文引用

- 「胜解行地所有一切增上意乐,名不清净意乐;从净胜意乐地乃至决定行地所有一切增上意乐,名清净意乐;究竟地所有一切增上意乐,名善清净意乐。」 - 「意乐以净信、择法为先,对诸佛法所有胜解,印可、理解而达于决定。」 - 「应调伏意乐即不清净意乐,俱生意乐即清净意乐、善清净意乐。」 - 「应调伏意乐能引生俱生意乐;俱生意乐能使菩萨迅速趣证无上正等菩提,并为天、人作诸义利。」 - 「已得增上清净意乐菩萨,……生生决定获得无尽财宝。」 - 「前三显示菩萨意乐清净,后七显示菩萨加行清净。」

By SutraAI-generated

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》論述「意樂清淨」時,主要採用「清淨意樂」「增上清淨意樂」「意樂清淨」等術語;在十五種「妙善增上意樂」的分類中,又以「清淨意樂」與「善清淨意樂」標示不同階位的意樂狀態。此處的「意樂」以淨信、擇法為先,指對諸佛法所有勝解,印可、理解而達於決定;故其清淨並非僅是一般善願,而是建立於勝解決定之上的殊勝意向。

一、就階位而言,本論明確區分「不清淨意樂」「清淨意樂」及「善清淨意樂」:勝解行地所有一切增上意樂,名為「不清淨意樂」;從淨勝意樂地乃至決定行地所有一切增上意樂,名為「清淨意樂」;到究竟地所有一切增上意樂,則名為「善清淨意樂」。因此,本論所說意樂清淨具有次第差別,並以菩薩所處之地界定其名稱。

二、本論又將「不清淨意樂」稱為「應調伏意樂」,因為此種意樂尚應加以思擇;將「清淨意樂」與「善清淨意樂」合稱為「俱生意樂」,因為其意樂之性已成就,並已善巧安立於所依之中。這組對應是本論的重要用詞:應調伏意樂即不清淨意樂,俱生意樂即清淨意樂、善清淨意樂,並非另立互不相關的種類。

三、就功能而言,「應調伏意樂」能引生「俱生意樂」;俱生意樂則能使菩薩迅速趣證無上正等菩提,並為天、人作諸義利,令其獲得利益安樂。本論並總攝過去、未來、現在菩薩於無上正等菩提的證得,皆由所說十五種意樂;由此可見,清淨意樂被安置在整體增上意樂次第及其趣證作用之中。

四、本論談布施時另用「增上清淨意樂」一語。尚未證得者,即使現無財物,仍可憑工巧、說法、勸化及身語協助等方便行施;已證增上清淨意樂的菩薩,則如已得超越諸惡趣一般,生生必定獲得無盡財寶。此段從布施資具與菩薩行的相續,呈現證得增上清淨意樂後的殊勝側面。

五、本論又以「意樂清淨」與「加行清淨」並舉,說某十法略顯二義:前三種顯示菩薩意樂清淨,其餘七種顯示菩薩加行清淨。由此可知,本論將內在意向之清淨與實際加行之清淨分別施設,而又置於同一略義之中加以統攝。

總括而言,《瑜伽師地論》的特色,是以「增上意樂」為總體語境,依地建立不清淨、清淨、善清淨三層差別,又以「應調伏意樂」「俱生意樂」重新統攝,並在布施行中使用「增上清淨意樂」、在略義中使用「意樂清淨」。其核心在於:以淨信、擇法及對佛法的勝解決定為基礎,使意樂由尚待思擇調伏,進至性成就、善安立,並發揮趣證菩提與利益安樂有情的作用。

Related